Autonomous Vehicle Guidance Evaluation

Similar documents
USDOT Connected Vehicle Research Program Vehicle-to-Vehicle Safety Application Research Plan

Recommended Practices for Crack Sealing HMA Pavement

Building a Safety Case for Automated Mobility: Smart Cities and Autonomous Mobility Getting There Safely

Concept of Operations

elektrobit.com Driver assistance software EB Assist solutions

Software Tools. Mechatronics, Embedded Control System Design, CAD, Finite Element Analysis, Information Technology and Big Data Areas.

Traffic Safety Measures Using Multiple Streams Real Time Data

MnROAD Safer, Smarter, Sustainable Pavements Through Innovative Research

INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS SUMMARY

Concept of Operations prepared for Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) for Rural Intersection Conflict Warning Systems II Deployment

Collaboration Between Unmanned Aerial and Ground Vehicles. Dr. Daisy Tang

FACILITATING AGRICULTURE AUTOMATION USING STANDARDS

Framework for Utilization of Mobile Data Collection. Parth Bhavsar (Rowan University) Nidhal Bouaynaya (Rowan University) Jeevanjot Singh (NJDOT)

Intelligent Systems. For more information on partnering with the Kansas City Plant, contact:

Chapter 1.0 Introduction

Deterioration Rates of Minnesota Concrete Bridge Decks

Increasing Throughput Using Automation. Jon Ranstrom Principal Engineer Navis

Connected vehicles and other advanced safety features can be effective in reducing, and maybe eliminating, these fatalities.

UNMANNED CONTAINER HANDLING MEETING THE FUTURE CHALLENGES

QUAD CITIES MANUFACTURING INNOVATION HUB DIGITAL B2B USERS GROUP

MnROAD PPA Workshop January 24 th 2013

Steps To Successful Automotive EMC Testing

DNA for Automated Driving. Jeremy Dahan May 8 th, 2017

WATERWORKS SERVICES WORKER I WATERWORKS SERVICES WORKER II WATERWORKS SERVICES WORKER III

Driving Compliance with Functional Safety Standards for Software-Based Automotive Components

Automation in the long-haul Challenges and opportunities of autonomous heavy-duty trucking in the U.S.

AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of Transportation

Appendix D: Functional Classification Criteria and Characteristics, and MnDOT Access Guidance

Request for Information from the Florida Dept. of Transportation

ENTERPRISE Transportation Pooled Fund Study TPF-5 (231)

Technology Overview: Enabling Automated Driving

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF AN AUTOMATED REAL-TIME DATA COLLECTION SYSTEM FOR LABOR-INTENSIVE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES

ITS Action Plan- Internet Consultation

FROM THE INVENTOR OF STRADDLE CARRIERS FOR CONTAINER HANDLING A-STRAD: FOR BROWN, GREEN AND FUTURE FIELDS

Software Framework for Highly Automated Driving EB robinos. Jared Combs July 27, 2017

TARDEC s Intelligent Ground Systems Overview. Matthew Skalny Robotic Control Software Capability Cell Lead US Army TARDEC

A MODAL COMPARISON OF DOMESTIC FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION EFFECTS ON THE GENERAL PUBLIC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. November 2007

Laboratory for Energy Smart Systems (LESS)

PROJECT DETAILS - Effects of Implements of Husbandry (Farm Equipment) on Pavement Performance

Development Tools for Active Safety Systems: PreScan and VeHIL

Automating Barrier Assessment with Mobile Security Robots Daniel Carroll, Doriann Jaffee (CSC), Katherine Mullens

The Three C s of Urban Transportation Planning

Smart Distribution Applications and Technologies - Program 124

Air Reconnaissance to Ground Intelligent Navigation System

How to reduce qualification time for new safety automated systems on rail infrastructure

Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV) Automotive Requirements Development. Dr. Gregory Schultz, Ms. Camille Robbins March 13, 2012

2040 Transportation Policy Plan Conversion to Performance Based Planning Basis. 25 th Annual CTS Transportation Research Conference May 21, 2014

Dipl.-Ing. Felix Lotz. System Architecture & Behavior Planning

Combat Feeding RFID Technical Demonstration Feb 23-26, 2004 CW4 Stephen Moody U.S. Army RDECOM, Natick Soldier Center Combat Feeding Directorate

ITS Technologies in Military Wheeled Tactical Vehicles: Status Quo and the Future

SMART WORK ZONE SOLUTIONS

Mastering Unexpected Situations Safely. Chassis & Safety Vehicle Dynamics

CAN Based Multiplexed Switches Electronics Engineering Technology Department Western Washington University. Jordan Mosher 10/19/12

Technical Layout of Harbin Engineering University UAV for the International Aerial Robotics Competition

Data processing. In this project, researchers Henry Liu of the Department of Civil Engineering and

The Integration Of Analysis And Test For Full Vehicle Structural Durability

ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF SECURITY MEASURES AT GATES OF SEAPORTS ON TRAFFIC OPERATION

Appendix B. Benefit-Cost Technical Memorandum

Yale Lift Trucks Driven by Balyo

ASPHALT QUALITY PARAMETERS TRACABILITY USING ELECTRONIC TAGS AND GPS. François Peyret 1, Robert. Tasky 2

ITS Heartland 2013 Annual Meeting March 25-27, 2013 // Topeka, Kansas. Thomas E. Kern Executive Vice President, ITS America

Mobile robotics KMR iiwa

Avoiding Mode Confusion in Service Robots

S6 AGVS Drive-Under Tractor

UC Berkeley Research Reports

Solar Powered AUVs; Sampling Systems for the 21 st Century

Mobile robotics KMP 1500

PRELIMINARY REVIEW COPY

Reinventing Leak Test

CITY OF JACKSONVILLE 2030 MOBILITY PLAN STUDY UPDATE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES PREPARED FOR: CITY OF JACKSONVILLE

Challenge Highway Safety. Those Darn Flashing Lights!

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TRAFFIC FLOW AND SAFETY OF FREEWAYS IN CHINA: A CASE STUDY OF JINGJINTANG FREEWAY

IoT Business Brief Energy & Oil Business DRIVING SOCIETY FORWARD

U.S. Update Connected Data Systems Program

Integrated Systems Engineering and Test & Evaluation. Paul Waters AIR FORCE FLIGHT TEST CENTER EDWARDS AFB, CA. 16 August 2011

mycopter Enabling Technologies for Personal Aerial Transportation Systems

Information Systems Tune Up or Major Overhaul?

Special Advertising Section

Mobile Robots TRANSFORMING MANUFACTURING AND LOGISTICS

Manitowoc Product Verification Center. Research and development for Grove, Manitowoc, National Crane, and Potain cranes

RESPONSIBILITIES INCLUDE:

Powering Disruptive Technologies with High-Performance Computing

Experience with RAP and RAS at the MnROAD Research Facility. Tim Clyne NCAUPG Technical Conference January 23, 2013

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO. Work in this project is performed by the U.S. Army Research Laboratory (ARL), Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD.

Barriers, Parapets, and Railings

REGIONAL ITS ARCHITECTURE FOR METROPOLITAN BOSTON

STATE OF MINNESOTA Office of the State Auditor

Interchange Workshop Report (August 2004)

Robotics & Autonomous Systems Ground Interoperability Profile (RAS-G IOP) NDIA GRCCE 2016

SYSTEMS ENGINEERING FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS for: ROAD WEATHER INFORMATION SYSTEM

INTERSTATE CORRIDOR PLANNING

Concept of Operations for Intersection Conflict Warning Systems (ICWS)

Sichere Intelligente Mobilität - Testfeld Deutschland. Safe Intelligent Mobility Field Test Germany

Cost Savings and Efficiency through Power Quality Monitoring. National Instruments

TDMS A Traffic Data Repository for Government and Business Use

Kfz Elektronik Entwicklung: Trends und Herausforderungen im IoT-Zeitalter

Publishable Executive summary

MGA Research Corporation

WAUSeON MACHINe. AND MANUf ACTURING. Robotic Automation. 995 Enterprise Avenue Wauseon, Ohio USA

Climate Change Adaptation: U.S. Navy Actions in the Face of Uncertainty

Transcription:

Report 9512 Number C~ -\L. 3 0314 00023 5399 r ' r r 4 Autonomous Vehicle Guidance Evaluation CTS TL 272.5.S53 1995 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA CENTER FOR STUDIES

Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. 3. Recipient's Accession No. MN/RC - 95/12 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE GUIDANCE March 1995 EVALUATION 6. 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Craig Shankwitz Max Donath 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Project/Task/Work Unit No. University of Minnesota Department of Mechanical Engineering 11. Contract(C) or Grant(G) No. 111 Church Street SE Minneapolis, MN 55455 (C)70210 TOC #91 12. Sponsoring Organization Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Minnesota Department of Transportation 395 John Ireland Boulevard St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 Executive Summary 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract (Limit: 200 words) This report provides an overview of autonomous vehicle technology, specifically focusing on sensing and control technologies. It resulted from safety issues at the Mn/ROAD high-load, low-volume pavement test facility. Appropriate technology helps ensure the safety of the truck driver that provides loads to the pavement and the safety of traffic on 1-94. Researchers currently are working to provide a semi tractor capable of driver-supervised autonomous operation at the Mn/ROAD facility. Such a driver-supervised system will allow the truck driver to monitor the operation of the automatic control system actively guiding the truck and will allow the driver to take control from the control computer when desired. 17. Document Analysis/Descriptors 18. Availability Statement Autonomous Vehicles No restrictions. This document is Sensing and Control Technology available through the National Truck Safety Technical Information Services, Computer Control Springfield, Va. 22161 Human Factors 19. Security Class (this report) 20. Security Class (this page) 21. No. of Pages 22. Price Unclassified Unclassified 8

Autonomous Vehicle Guidance Evaluation Executive Summary Prepared by: Craig Shankwitz Max Donath Department of Mechanical Engineering, the Center for Advanced Manufacturing, Design and Control (CAMDAC), and the ITS Institute The University of Minnesota 111 Church Street SE Minneapolis MN 55455 March 1995 Published by Minnesota Department of Transportation Office of Research Administration 200 Ford Building Mail Stop 330 117 University Avenue St Paul Minnesota 55155 This report represents the results of research conducted by the authors and does not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Minnesota Department of Transportation. This report does not contain a standard or specified technique.

I. Introduction The original scope of this contract was to provide Mn/DOT assistance in the area of autonomous vehicle technology, specifically focusing on sensing and control technologies. This was motivated by safety issues arising at the Mn/ROAD high load, low volume pavement test facility. Appropriate technology was to be used to ensure the safety of the driver of the truck providing loads to the pavement and the safety of traffic on 1-94. The University also was to help Mn/DOT with technical evaluations of submitted proposals and was to develop a plan to evaluate the performance of an autonomous truck to be acquired by Mn/DOT. Over the course of the contract, the needs of Mn/DOT changed, and the course of action taken by the University changed to adapt to those needs. The largest change associated with the program revolved around the truck acquisition. Originally, Mn/DOT was in discussion with Freightliner regarding the acquisition of a semi tractor-trailer capable of autonomous operation on the Mn/ROAD facility. The work with Freightliner failed to materialize. At the present time, the University is working with Navistar and Alliant Techsystems to provide a semi tractor capable of driver supervised autonomous operation at the Mn/ROAD facility. Such a driver supervised system will allow the truck driver to monitor the operation of the automatic control system actively guiding the truck and will allow the driver to take control from the control computer when desired. The truck will serve two roles: the first as a means with which to provide dynamic loads to the pavement on the high load/low volume portion of Mn/ROAD, and the second as a vehicle to perform driver supervised autonomous vehicle research and development. The remainder of the executive summary briefly describes the effort and results put forth under this contract. Four documents support the brief description provided herein: first, the 1993 Technology Reinvestment Program (TRP) [TRP, 1993] proposal provides a comprehensive review of the state of the art in autonomous highway vehicles as of 23 July 1993 and a description of our long term research plans involving autonomous vehicle control and driver performance monitoring; second, the 1994 proposal to the U. S. Army's Tank Automotive Command (TACOM) [Mn/DOT, 1994] supplements the 1993 TRP proposal and provides a detailed description of the acquisition and integration of the Navistar semi tractor and the first year research and development activities; third, a report [RADAR, 1994] presents an analysis and experimental procedure to determine the applicability of Millimeter Monolithic Integrated Circuit (MIMIC) radar to highway vehicles; and fourth, the report [CRASH, 1994] purveys an analysis of current collision avoidance techniques and experimental procedure to develop, test, and evaluate a Potential Field (PF) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) approach to collision avoidance systems.

II. Work Performed As with any research contract, an extensive literature search (including the Transportation Research Information Search (TRIS)) was undertaken to determine current state of the art as defined by the literature; the results of this search are documented in [TRP, 1993], [Mn/DOT, 1994], [RADAR, 1994], and [CRASH, 1994]. Because results presented in the literature can lag actual results by a number of years, trips to conferences, national labs, and technology vendors were undertaken by University personnel. Conferences attended include 1993 and 1994 IVHS America conferences, the 1994 Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems (AUVS) meeting in Detroit, and the IVHS America Safety and Human Factors Committee and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) workshop held in Reston, VA, March 21-22, 1994. Los Alamos National Lab and Sandia National Lab were visited in February 1994; Sandia had proposed to build an autonomous semi tractor-trailer to provide dynamic loads to a hot mix asphalt test track; however, Sandia did not win a contract and therefore did not build a vehicle. Technology vendors visited include Red Zone Robotics and K2T, both in Pittsburgh, PA. Red Zone has considerable experience with vehicle system integration; K2T produces Vision Based Neural Network lateral guidance equipment for autonomous vehicles. Trips were also taken with Steve Hay, Technical Liaison from the Office of Research Administration. Discussions were held with Erik Matella at ARPA, Bob Clarke and Ron Knipling at NHTSA's Office of Crash Avoidance, and Bill Rogers, Director of Research at the Trucking Research Institute of the American Trucking Association Foundation. Based on the literature search, visits, and previous work done in CAMDAC's Robotics Lab, a research direction was established. Based on available technology, level of system integration, sophistication, marketability, and time to commercialization, it was determined that a vision based lateral guidance and radar based longitudinal control and collision avoidance approach to vehicle control show the most promise for commercial applications. The use of an open architecture was determined to be essential to allow developing technology to be incorporated and evaluated on our vehicles. Based on these decisions, work first began on the University's Autonomous Land Experimental Robotic Testbed (ALX), which is based on a Yamaha electric golf cart. Later, as a result of discussions with Navistar during the preparation of the TRP proposal, the decision was made to purchase a Navistar semi tractor to be used as an experimental testbed for large scale evaluations of technology to be used in autonomous highway vehicles.

Vehicle sensing and control research underway at the University include a study of a Differential Global Positioning System (DGPS) used to determine vehicle location for navigation purposes, a sonar sensor based obstacle detection system which is used to implement collision avoidance behaviors, the development of collision avoidance behaviors, and an effort to develop a machine vision system capable of identifying lanes in a variety of environments. Considerable effort was expended in preparing ALX for the Second Annual Student Unmanned Vehicle Competition which was held in conjunction with the 1994 AUVS meeting in Detroit. Unfortunately, due to a power supply failure on ALX, the vehicle was unable to compete. Had the power supply not failed, we are confident the vehicle would have finished in the top three. Lessons learned on ALX will prove highly valuable during the semi tractor-trailer experimental testbed system integration. ALX is equipped with the same computer hardware, computer software, and operating system as will be found on the semi tractor experimental testbed. This was done for a number of reasons. First, using control hardware, software, and operating systems on the golf cart which are similar to those found on the truck affords familiarity to the student and other researchers, eliminating the learning curve for those who move on to the experimental semi tractor-trailer. Second, developments successfully implemented and refined on ALX may be ported to the experimental semi tractor-trailer with the least possible effort. Third, the hardware used on both ALX and the experimental semi tractor are the same as what is used in the Department of Defense-ARPA Demo II projects. Compatibility with ARPA's standard proves beneficial when applying for Defense Conversion (i.e., TRP) Funds. The tractor to be used for the experimental semi tractor-trailer testbed has been modified to Mn/DOT requirements as set forth by Dave Johnson and Dave Stregge. Discussions have been held with both Eaton and Bendix in an attempt to acquire a Traction Control System/Anti lock Brake System (TCS/ABS) for the tractor. Bendix has tentatively responded with an offer to provide a Electronic Control Unit (ECU), modulator valves, wheel speed sensors, a wiring harness, and installation. Word has not been returned concerning software and hardware support. After the truck is equipped with TCS/ABS, it will be shipped to the Twin Cities so that Alliant Techsystems may begin the system integration. System integration consists of determining the system architecture, purchasing required hardware and software, building necessary mounts, brackets, and wiring harnesses, and installing them on the truck and in the sleeper cab. System integration and system debug is expected to take 8 months after delivery of the truck. University personnel will assist and provide guidance to Alliant Techsystems during the system integration 3

time period. With the integration phase complete, the truck will be able to autonomously follow a route around the Mn/ROAD facility using onboard computer control and sensor technology. A driver will be in the truck at all times to monitor the status and performance of the control system. In addition to the development and acquisition of ALX and the experimental semi tractor-trailer, respectively, four documents were completed. The current state of the art and applicability of automotive radar was investigated in [RADAR, 1994]. Through this work, potential vendors for the radar system to be installed on the experimental testbed were identified and contacted. From these discussions, a potential evaluation plan was developed. The present state of collision avoidance systems was discussed in [CRASH, 1994]. Numerous other programs were investigated, including those undertaken by NHTSA's Office of Crash Avoidance. The research program outlined in [CRASH, 1994] reaches beyond the work currently undertaken, and will make significant contribution to the collision avoidance knowledge base. Two proposals were also prepared under this contract. The first, [TRP, 1993], outlined a four year vehicle control and driver monitoring research program which if successfully implemented would offer considerable safety benefits to vehicles and drivers on rural interstate highways. The TRP proposal was not successful in absolute terms, but did foster relationships with the American Trucking Association, truck manufacturers, technology vendors, trucking companies, and Mn/DOT. The TRP effort also demonstrated that we are able assemble a consortium to support our work. The second proposal, [Mn/DOT, 1994] was more successful in absolute terms. This proposal described a one year program in which vision based lateral control and radar based collision behaviors would be integrated into a driver supervised vehicle control system. This proposal passed technical muster, TACOM has indicated that this proposal is first on the queue to receive funding for FY 1995 if sufficient new funds can be identified. The project proposed to TACOM would make extensive use of the Mn/ROAD facility.

III. Future Work A continuation of the work performed for this contract is proceeding at the University of Minnesota. The continuation consists of three phases: the development of a computer based simulation environment used to perform mathematical and graphical analyses of vehicle control and sensing strategies, the continued use of ALX to develop and test novel collision avoidance technologies and strategies, and the development and subsequent research involving the semi tractor-trailer experimental testbed. The simulation environment provides a low cost, no risk means with which to develop and evaluate novel vehicle control and collision avoidance strategies. One important feature of the simulation environment is that it will be developed in a manner which will allow humans to interact with simulation models of computer controlled vehicles. Public acceptance of vehicle control systems will involve both those who purchase the control systems and those who do not. For the successful deployment of computer controlled vehicles, human and machine interaction must not interfere with the normal patterns of traffic flow. Early use of the simulation environment will allow the design of systems which will function with minimal inconvenience to human operators. ALX provides a low speed, low risk hardware platform with which undergraduate and graduate students can develop, test, and evaluate novel vehicle control technologies and strategies. ALX offers state of the art computer and sensor hardware in a lightweight, relatively safe vehicle. Full support of ALX is provided by a cart mounted mobile workstation, complete with generator. The semi tractor-trailer experimental testbed provides a means with which to develop, test, and evaluate control strategies optimized for highway applications. The intent is to use ALX and the experimental testbed sequentially. Initial research and development will be performed using ALX; once proven and refined for larger vehicles and higher speeds, vehicle control strategies will be ported to the experimental testbed. Because ALX and the experimental testbed use the same control computers, operating systems, and interfaces, the effort to port should be minimized. Details regarding how ALX and the semi tractor-trailer experimental testbed will be use for actual research are provided in [TRP, 1993] and [Mn/DOT, 1994].

IV. References [TRP, 1993] [CRASH, 1994] [RADAR, 1994] [CRASH, 1994] "The Smart Truck Consortium: Sensing and Control to Enhance the Safety and Driveability of Large Trucks," Proposal in Response to the Technology Reinvestment Program (TRP), July 1993. "Sensing and Control to Enhance the Safety of Large Trucks," Proposal in Response to the U.S. Army Tank Automotive Command (TACOM), BAA # DAAE07-94-Q-BAA2, March 1994. "MIMIC Sensor Technology for Highway Vehicle Applications: Potential and Challenges for the Future," Mn/DOT Report #95-10, March 1995. "Collision Avoidance: Smart Trucks on Rural Roads," Mn/DOT Report #95-11, March 1995.