Case No COMP/JV.45 - * BERTELSMANN / KOOPERATIVA FÖRBUNDET / BOL NORDIC. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE

Similar documents
Case No IV/M HAVAS ADVERTISING / MEDIA PLANNING. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 10/06/1999

Case No COMP/M OTTO VERSAND / SABRE / TRAVELOCITY JV. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No IV/M DAIMLER - BENZ / CHRYSLER. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 22/07/1998

Case No IV/M DHL / DEUTSCHE POST. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 26/06/1998

Case No COMP/M SHELL / BEB. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 20/11/2003

Case No IV/M VIVENDI / US FILTERS. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 29/04/1999

Case No COMP/M WPP / CORDIANT. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 25/07/2003

Case No COMP/M TNT FORWARDING HOLDING / WILSON LOGISTICS. REGULATION (EEC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No COMP/M ALCOA / BRITISH ALUMINIUM. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 27/10/2000

Case No COMP/M BUNGE / CEREOL. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 20/09/2002

Case No COMP/M LVMH / PRADA / FENDI. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 25/05/2000

Case No COMP/M COMPAGNIE DE SAINT-GOBAIN / RAAB KARCHER. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No COMP/M GOLDMAN SACHS / CINVEN / AHLSELL. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 06/01/2006

Case No COMP/M PAI / CHR. HANSEN. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 18/07/2005

Case No COMP/M UNIVERSAL STUDIO NETWORKS / DE FACTO 829 (NTL) / STUDIO CHANNEL LIMITED. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE

&DVH 1R,90 '(876&+( 3267 $6* 5(*8/$7,21((&1R 0(5*(5352&('85( Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 08/07/1999

Case No COMP/M DOW / ENICHEM POLYURETHANE. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 06/04/2001

Case No COMP/M MEXICHEM/ VESTOLIT

Case No COMP/M AVNET/ BELL MICRO. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 02/07/2010

Case No M MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES / SIEMENS / METAL TECHNOLOGIES JV

Case No COMP/M EDP / HIDROELECTRICA DEL CANTABRICO. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No COMP/M CVC / DSI. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 25/09/2007

Case No IV/M RECTICEL / GREINER. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 19/03/1997

Case No COMP/M ASTRIUM HOLDING/ VIZADA GROUP. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 30/11/2011

Case No COMP/M G SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND III/ BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY/ H J HEINZ COMPANY. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No IV/M ALCOA / INESPAL. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 24/10/1997

Case No COMP/JV.54 - SMITH & NEPHEW / BEIERSDORF / JV. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(2) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 30/01/2001

Comp-CCD/35/11 Amazon.com, Inc/The Book Depositary International Ltd

Control test under the EU Merger Regulation

Case No COMP/M S&B / HALLIBURTON / CEBO JV. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 18/04/2007

ANNEX XIV COMPETITION

Case M SYSCO / BRAKES

Case No COMP/M CANON/ OCE. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 22/12/2009

Case No COMP/M SMITHFIELD / OAKTREE / SARA LEE FOODS EUROPE. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No COMP/M SECOP/ ACC AUSTRIA. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 11/12/2013

Case No COMP/M.4276 AHOLD / KONMAR. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 4 (4) Date: 02/08/2006

COMMISSION OPINION. of XXX

In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32014M7023

Simplified procedure: EU Practice

Case No COMP/M HONEYWELL/ INTERMEC. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 13/06/2013

In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32011M6357

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Comments pursuant to Article 7(3) of Directive 2002/21/EC

Case No COMP/M SIEMENS / BAYER DIAGNOSTICS. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 31/10/2006

DIRECTIVE 2012/34/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 21 November 2012 establishing a single European railway area (recast)

Case No COMP/M AGILENT/ VARIAN. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Art 6(2) Date: 20/01/2010

Single market, implementation and legislation for consumer goods Pharmaceuticals : regulatory framework and market authorisations.

Case No COMP/M VISTEON CORPORATION/ AUTOMOTIVE ELECTRONICS BUSINESS OF JOHNSON CONTROLS

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

TOPIC 1B: DETERMINANTS AND THEORIES OF FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT (FDI)

1) I am pleased to inform you that the Commission has decided to approve the above aid scheme until 31 December 2013.

VETERINARY AND PHYTOSANITARY MATTERS

This document will be the basis for legal-linguistic revision in view of the common position.

EU MERGER CONTROL. UNIMORE, Seminario di Diritto della Concorrenza Modena, 11 April Mona Caroline Chammas OECD - Competition Division

EUROPEA U IO. Brussels, 12 June 2009 (OR. en) 2007/0195 (COD) PE-CO S 3648/09 E ER 170 CODEC 701

GLOSSARY OF TERMS ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND BUSINESS INNOVATION

Case M TIL / PSA / PSA DGD. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 31/07/2017

State aid SA /N FI Fixed operating aid for power plants using renewable energy sources

UNBUNDLING OF DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM OPERATORS

By-Laws for the Supervisory Board of Continental Aktiengesellschaft [Non-binding Convenience Translation]

The Community Innovation Survey 2010

{ 1 } The plenipotentiaries of: THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY, THE EUROPEAN COAL AND STEEL COMMUNITY,

CODE OF ETHICS GROUPE RENAULT

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE SINGLE RESOLUTION BOARD AND THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK IN RESPECT OF COOPERATION AND INFORMATION EXCHANGE

Case M DISCOVERY / SCRIPPS. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Art 6(2) Date: 06/02/2018

Espoo, Finland, 25 February 1991

EBA FINAL draft Regulatory Technical Standards

ARTICLE 29 DATA PROTECTION WORKING PARTY

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER

DECISION ON A TEMPORARY REGIME FOR THE PROVISION OF ANCILLARY SERVICES AND BALANCING OF THE POWER SYSTEM OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. State aid No N 327/ United Kingdom (Northern Ireland) Northern Ireland Beef Quality Initiative

(Legislative acts) DIRECTIVE 2014/55/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 16 April 2014 on electronic invoicing in public procurement

CIS Photovoltaic re-cladding project, Manchester

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE FINNISH, NORWEGIAN AND SWEDISH MINISTRIES OF FINANCE AND THE DANISH MINISTRY OF BUSINESS

D&I Quarterly » Court of Appeal Rules on Copyright to Contract Terms» Renewed Act on Cooperation within Undertakings

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT

EBA/RTS/2017/ December Final Report. Draft regulatory technical standards. on central contact points under Directive (EU) 2015/2366 (PSD2)

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 7 September 2017 *

Dr. Danguolė Bublienė THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CONSUMER RIGHTS DIRECTIVE: KEY ISSUES

Creative Europe MEDIA Sub-programme GUIDE FOR EXPERTS ON ASSESSMENT OF TV PROGRAMMING ACTIONS. Call for proposals EACEA/21/2017

The unfair commercial practices Directive. questions and answers

Remedies in EU Merger Control

Corporate strategies articulate the domain choices made by an organization define competitive scope. Managing corporate strategy starts with resources

Topic 3. Entry Modes

Official Journal of the European Union DIRECTIVE 2003/54/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL. of 26 June 2003

ECB-PUBLIC REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK. of 28 November on payments statistics (ECB/2013/43)

Case No COMP/M.2389 Shell/DEA. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 8(2) Date: 20/12/2001

Contents. General Principles

SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM Independence - Freedom - Happiness

A Guide to Competition Law

ARTICLE 29 Data Protection Working Party

KOMERCIJALNA BANKA AD SKOPJE CODE OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE OF KOMERCIJALNA BANKA AD SKOPJE

LAW AND POLICY OF EU NATURAL GAS MARKETS STATE OF PLAY AND FUTURE TRENDS

Case No COMP/M NYNAS/ SHELL/ HARBURG REFINERY. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 8 (1) Date: 02/09/2013

EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 25 April 2014 (OR. en) 2013/0084 (COD) PE-CONS 63/14 STATIS 39 SOC 185 ECOFIN 237 CODEC 711

Consultation Paper. Draft Implementing Technical Standards

Translation from Polish

BANQUE CARNEGIE LUXEMBOURG REMUNERATION POLICY

This guide contains: Details and explanations of the new SME definition which took effect on 1/1/2005. A model declaration that individual companies m

GUIDELINES ON SOUND REMUNERATION POLICIES EBA/GL/2015/22 27/06/2016. Guidelines

Transcription:

EN Case No COMP/JV.45 - * BERTELSMANN / KOOPERATIVA FÖRBUNDET / BOL NORDIC Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 12/05/2000 Also available in the CELEX database Document No 300J0045 Office for Official Publications of the European Communities L-2985 Luxembourg

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 12.05.2000 SG(2000) D/103632 In the published version of this decision, some information has been omitted pursuant to Article 17(2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 concerning non-disclosure of business secrets and other confidential information. The omissions are shown thus [ ]. Where possible the information omitted has been replaced by ranges of figures or a general description. PUBLIC VERSION MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION To the notifying parties Dear Sirs, Subject: Case No COMP/JV.45 Bertelsmann/ Kooperativa Förbundet (KF)/BOL Nordic Notification of 07.04.2000 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 1. On 07.04.2000, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 1 by which Bertelsmann AG ( Bertelsmann ) and Kooperativa Förbundet ( KF ) acquire joint control over the company Bokus AB ( BOL Nordic ), a currently wholly-owned KF subsidiary. 2. After examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 and does not raise serious doubts as to its compatibility with the common market. I. THE PARTIES 3. Bertelsmann heads a group of companies that operate internationally and form the Bertelsmann group. The main activities of the group are printing, publishing and distribution of books and magazines, book clubs, publishing and distribution of music and records and private television and related services in the multimedia sector. 4. KF is the Swedish cooperative union, which operates consumer cooperative retail outlets in Sweden. The business is divided into two main areas KF retailing and KF coordination and development. These two divisions are complemented by the media group KF Media and the investment company KF Invest. 1 OJ L 395 p. 1; corrigendum: OJ L 257 of 21.9.1990, p. 13; as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1310/97, OJ L 180 of 9.7.1997, p.1; corrigendum: OJ L 40 of 13.2.1998, p. 17. Rue de la Loi 200, B-1049 Bruxelles/Wetstraat 200, B-1049 Brussel - Belgium Telephone: exchange 299.11.11 Telex: COMEU B 21877. Telegraphic address: COMEUR Brussels.

5. BOL Nordic is a stock corporation under Swedish law. Its business activity is the online sale of books in the Nordic countries (Sweden, Finland, Norway and Denmark) covering the Nordic and English languages. It is an existing company currently wholly owned by KF under the name of Bokus AB. It will be renamed BOL Nordic within six months from the completion of the merger. BOL Nordic will be part of a worldwide system of BOL companies, which will offer on-line book sales in various countries. II. THE OPERATION 6. The basic structure of the proposed transaction can be described as follows: 7. Bertelsmann and KF will each have a 50% participation in the joint venture BOL Nordic. The parties will establish the joint venture by Bertelsmann acquiring a 50% stake in Bokus AB. 8. The parties will concentrate in BOL Nordic their on-line sale activities in the Nordic countries concerning books in the Nordic and English languages. The main purpose of this operation is the migration of the Bokus site to the BOL profile, which offers additional interactive content. III. CONCENTRATION 9. The proposed operation constitutes a concentration within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation. Joint control 10. BOL Nordic was before the notified operation under the sole control of KF. After the transaction, BOL Nordic will be equally held between Bertelsmann and KF (50/50). 11. Pursuant to the Shareholders Agreement, the Board of BOL Nordic will have an equal number of directors from Bertelsmann and KF. Each director has one vote and decisions of the board are passed by a simple majority of the board members, however requiring at least the vote of one director of each party. Deadlock situations are to be resolved by mutual call options for the shares of the other party without a casting vote for the chairman of the board. The chairman of the board will be designated by the shareholders on a one-year basis, the designating right alternating between KF and Bertelsmann. 12. Therefore, the joint venture will be under the joint control of KF and Bertelsmann. Autonomous economic entity acting on a lasting basis 13. BOL Nordic is an existing company, having become active in 1997, with sufficient assets and personnel at its disposal. After the transaction the joint venture will continue to have all necessary tangible and intangible assets to perform all functions required for an autonomous economic entity active in on-line retailing of books, including an unlimited licence to use the trade mark BOL, the technology, corporate image and other know-how of BOL International GmbH, a company of the Bertelsmann group. In conclusion, BOL Nordic will be able to perform on a lasting basis all the functions of an autonomous economic entity. 2

IV. COMMUNITY DIMENSION 14. The combined worldwide turnover of the undertakings concerned is more than EUR 5 000 million (Bertelsmann: EUR 13 199 million, KF: EUR [ ] million). 15. Each of them has an aggregate Community-wide turnover in excess of EUR 250 million (Bertelsmann: EUR 7 201 million, KF: EUR [ ] million), but they do not achieve more than two-thirds of their aggregate Community-wide turnover within one and the same Member State. The notified operation therefore has a Community dimension. V. COMPETITIVE ASSESSMENT A. The relevant market 16. Pursuant to its decisions of 06.05.1999 in Case No IV/M.1459 Bertelsmann/ Havas/BOL, and of 03.12.1999 in Case N COMP/JV 24 Bertelsmann/Planeta/BOL Spain, the Commission considers that the following product markets could be considered relevant for the assessment of this operation: (a) the market for distant sales of consumer books (including book clubs, mail order and sales by Internet), (b) the market for the Internet sales of books. According to the parties, the merger will not create any horizontally or vertically affected markets because Bertelsmann is not active in the Nordic countries. Consequently, there is no market share addition. 17. However, for the purposes of the present assessment the precise scope of the relevant product market can be left open, since on the basis of all plausible market definitions considered, the operation will not lead to the creation or strengthening of a dominant position. 18. The parties submit that the geographic market for the distant sales of books (including on-line sales via the Internet) is national. With regard to the market for on-line sales of books, the parties submit that, even if the sales can be addressed to customers on a worldwide basis, the relevant geographic market is also national. Today, Bokus sells to all Nordic countries but via national subsidiaries necessary both for purchasing and for distribution because the on-line sales need a national logistic system of storage and next-day delivery. Even for books written in English the geographical market seems to remain national, because there is no significant trade between the different Nordic countries or with non-member states. This is probably due to longer terms of delivery and higher costs for the consumer in relation to cross-border payments and exchange rates. 19. However, the exact determination of the geographic scope of the market can be left open because even in the narrowest market definition possible, i.e. national markets, the operation will not lead to the creation or strengthening of a dominant position. B. Dominance 1. The market for distant sales of consumer books (including book clubs, mail order and sales by Internet) 20. KF is active in the field of book clubs, mail order and sales by Internet. Bertelsmann has no activity in these fields in the Nordic countries. The parties estimate the market share in the different Nordic countries as follow: Sweden [ ]% ([ ]% BOL Nordic 3

and [ ]% concerning KF s remaining activities outside the joint venture), Finland [ ]%, Denmark [ ]%, Norway, insignificant). Given that position, the operation will not lead to the creation or strengthening of a dominant position. 2. The market for the Internet sales of books 21. The Internet sale of books in the Nordic countries is an emerging market. It represents 4% of the total market for the retailing of books in Sweden, 1.7% in Finland and 1% in Denmark and Norway. It is also a fast-growing market with an annual growth rate up to 75%. Bertelsmann is not active on this market in the Nordic countries. In Finland, Denmark and Norway, KF is only active on the market through Bokus. Its market share in these countries is respectively [ ]%, [ ]% and [ ]%. In Sweden, KF has another on-line activity through Akademibokhandeln AB, a bookseller chain, which has its own on-line sales facilities. It holds a 4% market share. Bokus has a market share of [ ]%. The KF s total market share is [ ]% in Sweden. 22. In the market for the Internet sales of books, there are already a significant number of specialised Internet booksellers as well as e-commerce ventures including bookshops. In addition, many bookshops also offer the possibility to order books on-line. Market entry barriers are low as the total costs of establishing an on-line bookshop are relatively low and there are no legal or regulatory barriers to entry. In addition, the online book market segment functions as a completely transparent market and therefore is fiercely competitive. This is due to the availability of so-called "meta search engines" comparing prices for specific books across multiple online bookshops. 23. For the reasons referred to above and because there is no addition of market shares, Bertelsmann being not active in the relevant geographical market, the operation will not lead to the creation or strengthening of a dominant position. C. Coordination of competitive behaviour: assessment under Article 2(4) 24. In the Nordic countries, Bertelsmann is not active in the market of the joint venture nor in upstream markets like book publishing. Due to language barriers Bertelsmann s publishing and retail activities in the other European national markets do not have competitive effects on the Nordic markets. Therefore, the operation will not lead to any co-ordination of the parents competitive behaviour in a market outside the joint venture. VI. ANCILLARY RESTRICTIONS 25. The parties have notified the following clauses as ancillary restrictions: 26. (i) A non-competition clause binding the parties, including all undertakings under their control, not to engage in the joint venture s business during the validity of the agreement and for a period of one year after a shareholder s exit. Excluded from this non-competition clause are only ancillary Internet activities conducted by KF prior to the execution of the Agreement. KF commits itself not to compete aggressively and to limit to less than [ ]% of its marketing expenses, the budget allocated to this site. 4

27. According to the parties, the non-competition clause serves to concentrate the parties efforts in the joint venture, to give the joint venture an unimpeded chance of brand migration to BOL and avoid free-riding by the parties. The parties also argue that the clause is necessary to secure their investments and to ensure the future economic success of the joint venture. 28. The Commission considers that the non-competition clause is, indeed, directly related and necessary for the joint venture s penetration of the market during a start-up period of five years. Beyond this period, the parties have failed to justify the need for this clause. It is, therefore, only covered by the present decision for a period of five years. 29. (ii) The provisions in the Franchise Agreement with BOL International GmbH which oblige BOL Nordic to accept certain conditions of the franchise network to allow it to make use of its business ideas (global trademark/branding, marketing and advertisement strategies, website design, e-commerce software developments including the IT, order and customer management services offered by BOL International GmbH). 30. These clauses in the Franchise Agreement provide to the joint venture the necessary assets to implement the joint venture s business by ensuring world-wide branding, economies of scale and high quality of customer care, and to protect the franchiser s intellectual property rights and maintain the common identity and reputation of the franchise network. BOL Nordic has concluded this agreement in order to benefit from the BOL trademark/branding, e-commerce know-how and marketing strategy. The notified clauses are directly related and necessary for the implementation of the concentration. Insofar as they could constitute a restriction of competition, they are, therefore, covered by the present decision. 5

VI. CONCLUSION 33. For the above reasons, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89. For the Commission, 6