CLOSURE PLAN. CFR (b) Document No. GERS Stingy Run Flyash Pond. Gavin Plant Cheshire, Ohio. October, 2016

Similar documents
Initial Closure Plan Slag Pond. Nelson Dewey Generating Station. Wisconsin Power and Light Company. Prepared for:

Closure Plan Ash Disposal Area PGE Boardman Power Plant

CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE CARE PLAN JAMES RIVER POWER STATION UTILITY WASTE LANDFILL CITY UTILITIES OF SPRINGFIELD, MISSOURI

Closure Plan Brame Fly Ash Pond

Closure and Post-Closure Care Plan NRG Indian River Generating Station Indian River Landfill Phase II

POST CLOSURE PLAN. CFR (d) GERS Landfill. Pirkey Plant Hallsville, Texas. October, 2016

NAUGHTON POWER PLANT NORTH ASH POND INITIAL CLOSURE PLAN

LANDFILL CLOSURE PLAN ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. INDEPENDENCE PLANT CLASS 3N CCR LANDFILL PERMIT NO S3N-R2 AFIN

Ottumwa Generating Station Project No Closure Plan for Existing CCR Revision: 0 Surface Impoundments TABLE OF CONTENTS

Stantec Consulting Services Inc Lebanon Road, Cincinnati, OH 45241

2016 LANDFILL INSPECTION REPORT CARDINAL PLANT BRILLIANT, OHIO

Table of Contents. Attachments Attachment A Photos Attachment B Inspection Map. Pages 3 of 10

David Miller, P.E.- Atlanta. The New Coal Ash Regulations Wednesday, May 6, 2015

Lansing Generating Station Project No Closure Plan for Existing CCR Revision: 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS

LANDFILL CLOSURE PLAN PLUM POINT ENERGY STATION CLASS 3N CCR LANDFILL PERMIT NO S3N AFIN:

Watershed size and name: The drainage area is acres. The pond is located within the Ohio River watershed. (2016 Inflow Design Plan)

Annual Inspection Report Lawrence Energy Center

INITIAL INSPECTION REPORT ASH LANDFILL AREA SPRINGERVILLE GENERATING STATION SPRINGERVILLE, ARIZONA

Lyon Creek Cedar Way Stormwater Detention Dam Operation and Maintenance Manual

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT BARRY ASH POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY

2015 ANNUAL ENGINEERING INSPECTION REPORT ENTERGY WHITE BLUFF PLANT CLASS 3N LANDFILL PERMIT NO S3N-R3 AFIN:

General Permit No.: OHR Page 53 of 146

Solid Waste Disposal Facility Closure Plan

CCR LANDFILL RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN. Pursuant to 40 CFR

CCR Certification: Initial Structural Stability Assessment (d)

SMART GYPSUM STACK MANAGEMENT FROM CONCEPT TO REALITY

Applying landforming to reclamation: A case study in Central Appalachia

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING

NEW CASTLE CONSERVATION DISTRICT. through. (Name of Municipality) PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION DRAINAGE, STORMWATER MANAGEMENT, EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL

Coal Combustion Facility Assessment Report. October 20, 2010

In-Situ Coal Combustion Products Impoundment Closure/Remediation Strategy

Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan

Written Post-Closure Plan. Pawnee Station - Active CCR Landfill Public Service Company of Colorado Denver Colorado

Mr. Michael Malone CPS Energy 145 Navarro Street San Antonio, Texas Project No

SECTION 3 DRAINAGE. 3-1 General. 3-2 Drainage Ordinances and Legal Requirements

2015 ANNUAL ENGINEERING INSPECTION REPORT ENTERGY INDEPENDENCE PLANT CLASS 3N LANDFILL PERMIT NO S3N-R2 AFIN:

AEP s CCR Impoundment Closure Projects - Lessons Learned, Insights & Exemplary Practices

TVA Colbert Fossil Facility Ash Disposal Pond 4

CCR Annual Inspection (b) for the Ash Pond at the San Miguel Plant. Revision 0

2016 ANNUAL DAM AND DIKE INSPECTION REPORT

(1) All sanitary landfill facilities, at a minimum, shall include the following:

THE ABATEMENT PLAN. beneficial abatement plan. For the purpose of defining the pollution potential of surface waters

Constructed Wetland Pond T-8


Sediment Basins and Skimmers. Jay Dorsey/John Mathews Ohio Dept. of Natural Resources, Division of Soil and Water Resources

SW-74 SERENOVA PRESERVE SITES 2, 3, 4, 8 MITIGATION PLAN

2017 Annual Inspection Report

Hydrologic and Hydraulic Analysis Report Mountaineer Plant Bottom Ash Pond Complex New Haven, West Virginia

Stormwater Local Design Manual For Houston County, Georgia

Erosion & Sedimentation Control Policy

Ponds. Pond A water impoundment made by excavating a pit, or constructing a dam or an embankment.

MODEL Stormwater Local Design Manual. City of Centerville

TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP CODE

Annual Inspection Report

Newmont Mining Corporation Tailing & Heap Leach Facility Management Standard

Sediment Basin. Fe= (Depends on soil type)

BMP #: Infiltration Basin

Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan

HAZARD POTENTIAL CLASSIFICATION REPORT

Infiltration Guidelines

APPENDIX A EARTHEN EMBANKMENT. VERSION 1.0 March 1, 2011

Base Metal and Iron Ore Mining

Understanding Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPPs) (SWPPPS)

HISTORY OF CONSTRUCTION

Richland County Department of Public Works Engineering (Land Development) Division

9.2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS

POND CONSTRUCTION. Woodland Steward Series

Constructed Wetland Use in Nonpoint Source Control

Section 2: Site Restorations and PCSM s Office of Oil and Gas Management Oil and Gas Industry Training Summer 2012

Section 2: Site Restorations and PCSM s Office of Oil and Gas Management Oil and Gas Industry Training Summer 2012

Location Drainage Study

Tailings Storage Facility Conceptual Closure Plan Alternatives Assessment

WELCOME TO THE CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER PERMIT WEBINAR

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION

4.8. Subsurface Infiltration

COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT REVIEW. Spring Lake Park Schools Westwood Middle School st Avenue NE, Spring Lake Park, MN 55432

FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL PLAN DUNKIRK GENERATION STATION 106 POINT DRIVE NORTH DUNKIRK, NEW YORK. PREPARED FOR: Dunkirk Power, LLC Dunkirk, New York

PARR HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT PARR HYDRO DEVELOPMENT & FAIRFIELD PUMPED STORAGE FACILITY DEVELOPMENT FERC PROJECT No SC SEPTEMBER 19, 2012

CHAPTER 7. San Dieguito River Flooding Adaptation

4.8. Subsurface Infiltration

Installation and Maintenance of Erosion Control BMPs

Storm Drain Inlet Protection

8.0 CLOSURE AND DECOMMISSIONING

POROUS ASPHALT Presented By: David Vogt Construction Division Manager Hooker Creek Companies, LLC February 24th, 2009

Project Drainage Report

Environmental Information Worksheet

FINDINGS: Olsson used a three-step analysis strategy to develop a benefit cost ratio that would indicate the relative feasibility of this project.

STORMWATER RUNOFF AND WATER QUALITY IMPACT REVIEW

Application For Waste Regulation (Check all that apply)

REROUTING DRAINAGE SYSTEMS

EFFECT OF UPSTREAM DEVELOPMENT ON THE CLEAR CREEK AREA

Chapter 21 Stormwater Management Bylaw

Extended Detention Basin (EDB) Sedimentation Facility

901 - TEMPORARY EROSION AND POLLUTION CONTROL SECTION 901 TEMPORARY EROSION AND POLLUTION CONTROL

SECTION EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROLS

The Relationship Between Water and the CCR Rule

A detailed guide and sizing manual for the application of Silva Cells to meet the requirements of bioretention under paving.

Stormwater Management Studies PDS Engineering Services Division ES Policy # 3-01

DAM INSPECTION CHECKLIST Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waterways Engineering Division of Dam Safety

PUBLIC WORKS SKAGIT COUNTY SAMISH ISLAND ROAD SAMISH ISLAND ROAD SLIDE REPAIR

Transcription:

CLOSURE PLAN CFR 257.102(b) Stingy Run Flyash Pond Gavin Plant Cheshire, Ohio October, 2016 Prepared for: AEP Generation Resources Gavin Plant Cheshire, Ohio Prepared by: American Electric Power Service Corporation 1 Riverside Plaza Columbus, OH 43215 Document No. GERS-16-023

Table of CONTENTS 1.0 OBJECTIVE... 4 2.0 DESCRIPTIONS OF CCR UNIT... 4 3.0 DESCRIPTION OF CLOSURE PLAN 257.102(b)(1)(i)... 5 4.0 CLOSURE IN PLACE 257.102 (b)(1)(iii)... 5 4.1 CLOSURE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS 257.102 (d)(1)... 5 4.2 DRAINING AND STABILIZING OF THE SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT 257.102(d)(2)... 6 4.3 FINAL COVER SYSTEM 257.102 (d)(3)... 7 5.0 ESTIMATE OF MAXIMUM CCR VOLUME 257.102 (b)(1)(iv)... 7 6.0 ESTIMATE OF LARGEST AREA OF CCR REQUIRING COVER 257.102 (b)(1)(v)... 7 7.0 CLOSURE SCHEDULE 257.102(b)(1)(vi)... 8 Page 3 of 8

1.0 OBJECTIVE This report was prepared by AEP- Geotechnical Engineering Services (GES) section to fulfill requirements of CFR 257.102(b) for Closure Plans of Existing CCR Surface Impoundments 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE CCR UNIT The fly ash pond is located approximately 2.5 miles northwest of the plant on Stingy Run which is a tributary to Kyger Creek. Kyger Creek empties into the Ohio River 3.0 miles downstream of the power plant. The Stingy Run flyash dam was constructed to retain the fly ash produced by the burning of pulverized coal at the General James M. Gavin Power Plant. The fly ash dam is an earthfill zoned embankment 145 feet high. The crest of the dam varies but is a minimum elevation of 735 feet. Reservoir levels are regulated by the 100-foot high intake tower of the principal spillway. Although originally constructed for settling fly ash, plant operations changed with the installation of scrubbers, so that the plant ceased all fly ash slurry discharges into the reservoir in 1994. Since that time, only direct precipitation, storm water runoff from upstream areas, and acid mine drainage from mined areas enter the reservoir. AEP has started pond closure project in 2015 and plan to close the pond with a cover system combined with series of channel for water management. At the end of the project the entire flyash pond will be capped and covered with cover system. The Gavin plant is currently operated by AEP Generation Resources Inc. In September 2016, AEP announced the sale of the Gavin assets including the Flyash Pond (post closure). Pursuant to the sales agreement, the Gavin plant will be transferred to LightStone Generation (a joint venture between Blackstone and ArcLight Capital Partners, LLC) in 2017 after necessary regularity approvals. During this interim period, AEP is doing project management and engineering support work and also providing transitioning support to LightStone Generation. Page 4 of 8

3.0 DESCRIPTION OF CLOSURE PLAN 257.102(b)(1)(i) [A narrative description of how the CCR unit will be closed in accordance with this section] The flyash pond will be capped and closed in place. The closure will consist of re-grading and backfilling the existing onsite materials and the installation of an impermeable cap with a vegetative cover. The subgrade or contouring fill will be finished to achieve a positive drainage to promote surface water runoff. The regraded surface will be covered with a flexible geomembrane liner and 2-feet of soil fill material that is capable of sustaining native plant growth. Surface runoff will be managed by installing drainage channels over the new cover. The surface soil will be seeded to promote the growth of a vegetative cover. 4.0 CLOSURE IN PLACE 257.102 (b)(1)(iii) [If closure of the CCR unit will be accomplished by leaving the CCR in place, a description of the final cover system, designed in accordance with paragraph(d) of this section, and the methods and procedures to be used to install the final cover. The closure plan must also discuss how the final cover system will achieve the performance standards specified in paragraph (d) of this section.] The final cover system will consist of a liner system (flexible geomembrane, drainage layer, soil cover, and drainage channels). The geomembrane will be installed directly over the graded CCR material and/or contouring fill. The final cover will be seeded to promote growth of a vegetative cover. The final cover slope will be a minimum of 2% and will covey water to a NPDES permitted outfall via drainage channels. Prior to installation of the final cover system the impoundment will be drained of the free water and soil material will be regraded to provide a stable subgrade. 4.1 CLOSURE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS 257.102 (d)(1) 4.1.1 SECTION 257.102(d)(1)(i) [Control, minimize or eliminate, the maximum extent possible extent feasible, post-closure infiltration of liquids into the waste and releases of CCR, leachate, or contaminated run-off to the ground or surface waters or to the atmosphere.] The final cover system will cover the CCR material and will have a permeability that is less than or equal to the permeability of the natural subsoils and is no greater than 1 x 10-5 cm/sec. Page 5 of 8

4.1.2 SECTION 257.102(d)(1)(ii) [Preclude the probability of future impoundment of water, sediment, or slurry.] The impoundment will consists of a gentle grade to a minimum slope of 2% to prevent the ponding of water sediment or slurry. 4.1.3 SECTION 257.102(d)(1)(iii) [Include measures that provide for major slope stability to prevent the sloughing or movement of the final cover system during the closure and post-closure care period.] The final cover system will be gently graded with a minimum of 2% slope. The final configuration of the impoundment will meet the stability requirements to prevent the sloughing or movement of the final cover system during the closure and post-closure care period. 4.1.4 SECTION 257.102(d)(1)(iv) [Minimize the need for further maintenance of the CCR unit.] The impoundment will be vegetated to prevent erosion. Maintenance of the final cover system will include mowing. 4.1.5 SECTION 257.102(d)(1)(v) [Be completed in the shortest amount of time consistent with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.] The CCR unit is under construction for closure and expected to be closed by 2020 per the current schedule. 4.2 DRAINING AND STABILIZING OF THE SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT 257.102(d)(2) [The owner or operator of a CCR surface impoundment of any lateral expansion of a CCR surface impoundment must meet the requirements of paragraph (d)(2)(i) and (ii) of this section prior to installing the final cover system required under paraphraph (d)(3) of this section.] 4.2.1 SECTION 257.102(d)(2)(i) [Free liquids must be eliminated by removing liquid wastes or solidifying the remaining wastes and waste residue.] As part of closure of the CCR unit, all free water will be removed. Page 6 of 8

4.2.2 SECTION 257.102(d)(2)(ii) [Remaining waste must be stabilized sufficient to support the final cover system.] The remaining waste that make up the subgrade of the final cover system will be stabilized by removal of free liquids and providing bridging as necessary. 4.3 FINAL COVER SYSTEM 257.102 (d)(3) [If a CCR unit is closed by leaving CCR in place, the owner or operator must install a final cover system that is desgined to minimize infiltration and erosion, and at a minimum, meets the requirements of paragraph (d)(3)(i) of this section, or the requirements of the alternative final cover system specified in paragraph (d)(3)(ii) of this section. The final cover system must be designed and constructed to meet the criteria in paragraphs (d)(3)(i)(a) through (D) of this section. The design of the final cover system must be included in the written closure plan.] The final cover system will consist of a flexible geomembrane that will have a permeability that is less than or equal to the permeability of the natural subsoils and is no greater than 1 x 10-5 cm/sec. The geomembrane will be installed directly over the graded CCR material and/or contouring fill. Over the geomembrane will be installed an infiltration layer consisting of 24 inch of earthen material. The final cover will be seeded to promote growth of a vegetative cover. The final cover slope will be a minimum of 2% and will covey water to a NPDES permitted outfall. The final cover slope will be a minimum of 2% to accommodate settling and subsidence. 5.0 ESTIMATE OF MAXIMUM CCR VOLUME 257.102 (b)(1)(iv) [An estimate of the maximum inventory of CCR ever on-site over the active life of the CCR unit.] The maximum CCR inventory in the Ash Pond is approximately 19,800 acre-ft at a maximum flyash elevation of 725 feet. Current CCR material in place is approximately 8,316 acre-ft. 6.0 ESTIMATE OF LARGEST AREA OF CCR REQUIRING COVER 257.102 (b)(1)(v) [An estimate of the largest area of CCR unit ever requiring a final cover The largest area of the CCR unit requiring a final cover is approximately 250 acres. Page 7 of 8

7.0 CLOSURE SCHEDULE 257.102(b)(1)(vi) [A schedule for completing all activities necessary to satisfy the closure criteria in the section, including an estimate of the year in which all closure activities for the CCR unit will be completed. The schedule should provide sufficient information to describe the sequential steps that will be taken to close the CCR unit, including identification of major milestones such as coordinating with and obtaining necessary approvals and permits from other agencies, the dewatering and stabilization phases of the CCR surface impoundment closure, or installation of the final cover system, and the estimated timeframes to complete each step or phase of the CCR unit closure. Closure of the pond has already started in 2015. Based on the current closure schedule, the pond should be closed by 2020. Page 8 of 8