NLA Test & Measurement 2011 Workshops Roodevallei conference & meeting Hotel 19 th 20 th September 2011

Similar documents
NOTES TO THE SPECIFICATION FOR REPEATED LOAD TRIAXIAL (RLT) TESTING FOR PAVEMENT MATERIALS

SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

Geotech Services, X-18, MIDC, Hingna, Nagpur, Maharashtra. Discipline Mechanical Testing Issue Date

National AustStab Guidelines Pavement design guide for a cement stabilised base layer for light traffic [Version B 31 July 2012]

Tex-121-E, Soil-Lime Testing

DETERMINATION OF WORKABILITY OF FRESH CONCRETE BY SLUMP TEST

CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLISION WASTE AS A REPLACEMENT OF FINE AGGREGATE IN CONCRETE

Technical Brief. The Versatile Chemical. National Lime Association. Lime-Treated Soil Drying, Modification, and Stabilization

IPWEA/WALGA Specification for the supply of recycled road base

THE INFLUENCE OF FINES CONTENT AND PLASTICITY ON THE STRENGTH AND PERMEABILITY OF AGGREGATE FOR BASE COURSE MATERIAL

SOUTH AFRICAN PAVEMENT ENGINEERING MANUAL. Chapter 3. Materials Testing

TESTING SOIL CONDITIONS FOR VEHICLE SECURITY BARRIER TESTS

VARIOUS QUALITY CONTROL TESTS

A Laboratory Technique for Estimating the Resilient Modulus Variation of Unsaturated Soil Specimens from CBR and Unconfined Compression Tests

Spectrum of Axles Approach

Expansive Soil Stabilization using Plastic Fiber Waste Polypropylene

KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION TO THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, EDITION 2007

STAINLESS STEEL SLAGS IN HYDRAULIC BOUND MIXTURES FOR ROAD CONSTRUCTION, TWO CASE STUDIES IN BELGIUM

Mr. Jody Wall Carolina Stalite P.O. Box 186 Phone: (704)

6. STABILIZED PAVEMENT MATERIALS

Foreword... iii Table of Contents...v List of Figures...vii List of Tables...viii. Chapter 1 : Background...1

DESIGN OF BITUMINOUS MIXTURES

Investigations on Some Properties of no-fines Concrete

FREEZING AND THAWING TESTS OF COMPACTED SOIL-CEMENT MIXTURE


Effect of Nano-Copper on Performance of Black Cotton Soil

MATERIAL SPECIFICATION FOR AGGREGATES - MISCELLANEOUS

Iowa Thickness Design Guide for Low Volume Roads Using Reclaimed Hydrated Class C Fly Ash Bases

Laboratory Soil Classification

RESILIENT MODULUS TESTING OF OPEN GRADED DRAINAGE LAYER AGGREGATES FOR INTERLOCKING CONCRETE BLOCK PAVEMENTS

LIST OF DAC (17025) ACCREDITED TESTS CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS TESTING. Determination of sulphate content of soil and ground water testing

APPENDIX D ANSWERS TO STUDY QUESTIONS/PROBLEMS

This annex is valid from: to Replaces annex dated: Location(s) where activities are performed under accreditation

THE STRENGTH AND STIFFNESS MODULUS OF THIN LAYER HOT MIX ASPHALT CONCRETE AT VARIOUS TEMPERATURE

Recommended Mix Design Guidelines For Cold Recycling Using Foamed (Expanded) Asphalt Recycling Agent CR202

t ghi yr Cop

Aggregate Optimization. Quality Assurance Workshop February Justin Bryan. Frank Bryan Inc. Bryan Materials Group

SECTION AGGREGATES

STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SUPPLEMENT 1120 MIXTURE DESIGN FOR CHEMICALLY STABILIZED SOILS. June 13, 2011

MOLDING, TESTING, AND EVALUATING ASPHALT BLACK BASE MATERIALS

Superpave Design Guidelines for Using Hot-Mix Recycled Asphalt Pavement and Recycled Asphalt Shingles

DESIGN OF HOT MIX ASPHALT USING BAILEY METHOD OF GRADATION

REPORT STATUS: DATE: Report n :

Date: Participant Name: Proctor:

Full-Depth Reclamation with Cement

1 Testing Equipment. Laboratory General Sampling Sample Reduction Sieve Analysis Decantation Deleterious and Chert

Soil Stabilization by using Industrial Waste Material as a Stabilizer

Experimental Study on Concrete and Cement Plaster Using Partial Replacement of Quarry Rock Dust as Fine Aggregate

Classification of Soils

Mix Design and Pumped Concrete

8 Testing Equipment. Laboratory General Sampling Sample Reduction Sieve Analysis Decantation Deleterious and Chert

ENGINEERING MATERIALS Assignment #8: Concrete Mix Design

Laboratory Certification For. National Engineering Services for Rehabilitation of Afghanistan (NESRA)

Test 1 : Standard Slump and Flow Table Tests

SUPERPAVE. SUperior PERforming Asphalt PAVEments. History of Hveem Mix Design

Characterizing Engineering Properties of Foundry Sands

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

Abstract ISBN ( ( (

Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Engineering 125 (2015 )

Engineering Properties of Foamed Recycled Glass as a Lightweight Fill

STUDIES ON MARSHALL AND MODIFIED MARSHALL SPECIMENS BY USING CRMB

Utilization of Stone Dust as Fine Aggregate Replacement in Concrete

OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION LABORATORY QUALIFICATION POLICY

Effect of Lime Stabilisation on the Strength and Microstructure of Clay

Study of Interlocking Effect by the Push Test

May 1, 2000 LAB MANUAL SPECIFIC GRAVITY & ABSORPTION of COARSE AGGREGATE AASHTO Designation T 85 (Mn/DOT Modified)

Sustainable Use of Crushed Concrete Waste as A Road Base Material

Aggregate Specifications

UNDERSTANDING UNPAVED ROAD MATERIAL PERFORMANCE INTERPRETATION David Jones, PhD University of California Pavement Research Center

Fundamentals of Concrete

Capacity Building at LoGITReC in Tanzania

Schedule of Accreditation issued by United Kingdom Accreditation Service High Street, Feltham, Middlesex, TW13 4UN, UK

CBR of Soaked Clay Drained by Sandy Layer

PROPERTIES OF GREEN CONCRETE CONTAINING QUARRY ROCK DUST AND MARBLE SLUDGE POWDER AS FINE AGGREGATE

Proctor Compaction Testing

Hydraulic Conductivity of Cement-Treated Soils and Aggregates after Freezing

IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved

Recycled Base Aggregates in Pavement Applications

Truck Mixer, Agitator and Front Discharge Concrete Carrier. Standards. TMMB Printing

Replacement of Fine Aggregate in Concrete with Municipal Solid Waste Bottom Ash from Incinerator

CONCRETE TECHNOLOGY LABORATORY

ISSN: ISO 9001:2008 Certified International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology (IJEIT) Volume 3, Issue 1, July 2013

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION FOR SUPERPAVE HMA MIXTURES. C&T:CJB 1 of 5 C&T:APPR:SJP:DBP: FHWA:APPR:

Properties of Concrete Incorporating Recycled Post-Consumer Environmental Wastes

Laboratory Performance of RBI 81 Stabilized Soil for Pavements

Volumetric Analysis-Based Comparison between Superpave and Marshall Mix Design Procedures

CE 240 Soil Mechanics & Foundations Lecture 3.3. Soil Compaction (Das, Ch. 5)

Reuse of Ceramic Waste as Aggregate in Concrete

Investigation of Natural Plasticizers in Concrete

Effect of silica fume on the resistance to chloride ion penetration in high performance concrete

Evaluation and Mix Design of Cement-Treated Base Materials with High RAP Content. Paper Number TRB 2011 Annual Meeting

Method of Test for Density and Air Voids of Asphalt Concrete by the Marshall Method

STUDY ON PERFORMANCE OF MANUFACTURED SAND AS FINE AGGREGATES IN HIGH STRENGTH CONCRETE CONSTRUCTIONS

Testing of Concrete Blocks

Concrete. Chapter 10 Properties of Fresh Concrete. Materials of Construction-Concrete 1. Wikipedia.org

Section 25 Aggregate Subbase

SOIL CLASSIFICATION BASICS Commonly based on grain size and soil consistency. Several classification systems exist:

Mix Design For Concrete Roads As Per IRC

Properties of Concrete as Influenced by Shape and Texture of Fine Aggregate

cttp Soils Course Overview Testing Technician Atterberg Limits LL, PL, PI

Transcription:

NLA Test & Measurement 2011 Workshops Roodevallei conference & meeting Hotel 19 th 20 th September 2011 Currents test methods on SABS website Summary of changes for granular methods Grading revisions General changes for apparatus Wet sieving Dry sieving Moisture determination Atterberg Tests MDD & OMC CBR 1

revisions 1 2 3 SANS 3001-PR1 Determination of uncertainty of measurement, repeatability, reproducibility and bias SANS 3001-PR5 Computation of soil-mortar percentages, coarse sand ratio, grading modulus and fineness modulus SANS 3001-PR10 Checking, handling, maintenance and verification of test sieves 1 2 3 4 SANS 3001-AG1 Particle size analysis of aggregates by sieving SANS 3001-AG2 Determination of the average least dimension of aggregates by direct measurement SANS 3001-AG3 Determination of the average least dimension of aggregates by computation SANS 3001-AG4 Determination of the flakiness index of coarse aggregate revisions 2

5 6 SANS 3001-AG20 Determination of the bulk density, apparent density & water absorption of aggregate particles retained on the 5 mm sieve for road construction materials SANS 3001-AG21 Determination of the bulk density, apparent density & water absorption of aggregate particles passing the 5 mm sieve for road construction materials revisions 1 SANS 3001-BT20 Certification of a binder distributor revisions 2 3 4 5 SANS 3001-BT21 Validation of a binder distributor dipstick SANS 3001-BT22 Power and road speed indicator tests for a binder distributor SANS 3001-BT23 Pump system performance of a binder distributor SANS 3001-BT24 Measurement of transverse distribution ('Bucket test') for a binder distributor 3

Revisions 1 2 3 4 5 SANS 3001-GR1 Wet preparation and particle size analysis SANS 3001-GR2 Dry preparation and dry particle size analysis of gravels and sands SANS 3001-GR10 Determination of the one-point liquid limit, plastic limit, plasticity index and linear shrinkage SANS 3001-GR11 Determination of the liquid limit with the two-point method SANS 3001-GR12 Determination of the flow curve liquid limit Revisions 6 7 8 9 10 SANS 3001-GR20 Determination of the moisture content by oven-drying SANS 3001-GR30 Determination of the maximum dry density and optimum moisture content SANS 3001-GR31 Determination of the maximum dry density and optimum moisture content of laboratory mixed cementitiously stabilized materials SANS 3001-GR40 Determination of the California bearing ratio SANS 3001-GR50 Preparation, compaction and curing of specimens of laboratory mixed cementitiously stabilized materials 4

11 SANS 3001-GR51 Sampling, preparation, compaction and curing of field mixed freshly cementitiously stabilized materials including the determination of the MMD and OMC Revisions 12 13 14 SANS 3001-GR52 Sampling and preparation of cored specimens of field compacted, matured, cementitiously stabilized material SANS 3001-GR53 Determination of the unconfined compressive strength of compacted and cured specimens of cementitiously stabilized materials SANS 3001-GR54 Determination of the indirect tensile strength of compacted and cured specimens of cementitiously stabilized materials TMH1 A1(a) & A5 SANS 3001 GR1 Description Apparatus Sample Procedure Comments Wet sieve & prep of fines A1 (b) GR2 Dry sieve Sieve sizes rationalised Sieve sizes rationalised Similar Similar Similar, with <0,075 Sieve sizes incorporate e.g. 4,75 to 5 d Dry only < 5 mm sieve to 0,425 mm 0,075 mm fraction not determined 5

TMH1 A2 & A3 A2 & A3 SANS 3001 GR10 GR11 Description Apparatus Sample Procedure Comments Atterberg limits & LS LL only refers to GR10 for PL & LS Similar Similar One point LL, PL and LS Similar Similar Two point LL only Flow curve LL only Instead of describing mc method in each test method provides generic for all situations A2 & A3 GR12 Similar Similar - GR20 Moisture content Reintroduce s LS from old TMH1 : Method same but splitting up LL methods New TMH1 A7 A8 SANS 3001 GR30 GR40 Description Apparatus Sample Procedure Comments Maximum dry density Californian Bearing Ratio Similar Similar Allows for scalped >37,5 (ref) or crushed <20 Scalped >37,5 Similar with greater detail of mc points Similar C effort 5 layers x 11 blows Differs in sample prep of >20 mm Differs in sample prep of >20 mm 6

Most methods are very similar to traditional TMH1 with minor changes & amendments. The Moisture determination is intending for use throughout the SANS 3001 methods. Minor amendments made to rationalise apparatus dimensions such as mould sizes. Changes to some sieve sizes appears to be significant but all are less than 7 % does not affect outcome as they are given a slightly altered position on the grading curve. GRADING Nominal aperture size of sieve (mm) Percentage passing through sieve by mass Nominal max size 37,5 mm 26,5 mm 37,5 100 28 86-95 26,5 84-94 100 20 73-86 87-96 19 71 84 85 95 14 61-76 73 86 13,2 59 75 71 84 5 37-54 43-71 4,75 36 53 42 60 2 23 40 27 45 0,425 11 24 13 27 0,075 4-12 5-12 7

Sieve size (mm) Maximum nominal size (mm) Semi-gap Continuously graded 37,5 26,5 37,5 26,5 Percentage passing sieve by mass 37,5 100 100 28 87 100 100 86 95 100 26,5 85 100 100 84 94 100 20 77 96 93 100 73 86 87-96 19 75 95 92 100 71 84 85 95 14 83 94 61 76 73-85 13,2 82 93 59 75 71 84 10 61 81 73 88 52-68 64-79 9,5 60 80 72 87 50 67 62 78 7,1 62 77 6,7 60 75 5 46 61 51 65 37 54 43 61 4,75 45 60 50 64 36 53 42 60 2,36 40 52 40 52 25 42 30 47 2 39 51 39 51 23-40 28-44 1,18 36 47 36 47 18 33 21 37 1 35-46 35 46 17-32 20-35 0,600 32 42 32 42 15 30 0,300 22 35 22 35 9 21 11 24 0,150 10 20 10 20 6 17 8 19 0,075 4-10 4 10 4-12 5-12 MDD difference primarily due to scalping of +37,5 mm fraction as reference method for preparing sample procedure for crushing coarse material to pass +20 mm fraction also given with restrictions CBR is different in that reference sample preparation (scalping) used in GR30 is used the compaction effort for the C specimen is 5 layers x 11 blows instead of 3 layers x 55 blows. 8

Apparatus dimensions critical to outcome of method or procedure are given a tolerance All other dimensions nominal & should be considered fit for purpose. Existing apparatus that complies with the requirements of TMH1 may be used until apparatus no longer fit for purpose. More detail descriptions provided in test methods to ensure reduced variance Not much different but ensures all conduct test method correctly Ensure steps are made more explicit Additions or revisions Larger particles 14 mm may be re-orientated by hand to assist in getting them to pass thru the sieve openings without any additional force. Hand sieving still reference method. Mechanical sieving allowed but each sieve verified by hand sieving No over loading allowed on individual sieves. Table detailing maximum mass per sieve size allowed. Sieving completed when > 0.1% of total sample mass passes thru sieve after 1 minute of continual sieving. Total mass difference before & after sieving < 1.0%. Method also covers maintenance & traceability of sieves. 9

Natural Crushed gravels Concrete, surface treatments, HMA 63,0 75 50 (53,0) 50 (53) 37,5 37.5 25 (26,5) 25 (26.5) 20 (19,0) 20 (19) 14 (13,2) 14 (13.2) 10 (9.5) 7.1 (6.7) 5 (4,75) 5 (4.75) 2,0 2 (2.36) 1 (1.18) 0.6 0,425 < 0,425 0.3 0.15 0.075 0.075 < 0.075 < 0.075 Combines TMH1 method A5 (-0.075 mm) Constant mass = < 0.1 % change in mass over 1 hr drying Scale size dropped from 5 4kg accurate to 0,1 g If -0.075 fraction to be tested use 450 g Amount of material required detailed Full fraction > 20 mm weighed. Fraction of material used in test used to reduce fraction > 20 mm in same proportion Material not quartered 10

Although GR also applicable to AG. Do not use microwave ovens. Separated into field & lab samples + large (> 50 g) & small (< 50 g) samples. Genuine dry grading used for production control in quarries for Crushing QC/QA No wetting agent required for fines Scales increased to 20 kg from 5 kg Sample size detailed Brush fines from coarse aggregate Other changes for wet sieving also apply 11

Combines all 3 test methods LL, PL & LS Uses 1 point test for experienced testers GR11 & GR12 give instruction for 2 point & flow curve method for less experienced testers Either on -0.425 or -0.425 & 0.075 mm For high PI s (> 20) use flow curve LS trough also baseless for highly plastic material (PI > 20) Material increased from 48 approx 60 g PL 2 determinations of 2 samples each 4 samples in 2 tins of 2 3 g each Apparatus dim changes Moulds 152 ± 0.5 mm dia, ±1.0 mm for height (152.4 mm) Collar at least 70 mm Due to wear volume needs to be accurately determined!! Spacer plate 25 ± 1.0 mm (25.4 mm) Concrete block @ 25 MPa 750 x 750 mm (200 kg) Hammer 50 mm diameter, 4 500 g (4 536 g) fall 460 mm (457.2 mm) Mass loss 20 g recondition or replace) 12

Drying process given in more detail Aggregates scalped on 37.5 mm sieve If < 30 % retained on 20 mm sieve Conduct crushing as per TMH 1 method Sample size > to 40 kg, CBR 65 kg 16 split riffled fractions combined in specific manner Soaking once moistened limited to 60 min Moisture determination on half sample once extruded Apparatus dim changes Piston 1 963 mm 2 (1935 mm 2 ) Penetration rate 1 mm/ min (1.27 mm/min) Depth to 2.5 mm (2.54), 5.0 mm (5.08), 7.5 mm (7.62) penetration piston head 50 ± 0.5 mm @ 4 500 ± 50 g B mould 22 blows on 5 layers (25 blows on 5 layers) C mould 11 blows on 5 layers (55 blows on 3 layers) Water height in bath approx 10 mm (12 mm) Penetration & force read every 30 ± 2 sec (0.635 mm) 13