TGA testing of biomass char gasification Antero Moilanen

Similar documents
VTT PUBLICATIONS 769. Antero Moilanen & Muhammad Nasrullah. Gasification reactivity and ash sintering behaviour of biomass feedstocks

Principles of Pyrolysis

The Role of Solid Fuel Conversion in Future Power Generation

Biomass gasification gas cleaning by reforming Energy Lab 2.0 meets Neo-Carbon Energy Noora Kaisalo

Mikko Hupa Åbo Akademi Turku, Finland

Investigators: R. E. Mitchell, Associate Professor, Mechanical Engineering Department; P. A. Campbell and L. Ma, Graduate Researchers

STEAM GASIFICATION OF LOW RANK COAL CHARS IN A THERMOBALANCE REACTOR AND A FLUIDIZED BED REACTOR

Biomass Gasification IEA Task 33 Country Report - Finland Piteå, Sweden

Characterization of Coal and Biomass. Conversion Behaviors in Advanced Energy Systems

Outline. Comparative Fast Pyrolysis of Agricultural Residues for Use in Biorefineries. ECI Bioenergy-II:

Intermediate Pyrolysis: A Sustainable Biomass-to-Energy Concept

Available online at ScienceDirect. 9th International Conference on Applied Energy, ICAE2017, August 2017, Cardiff, UK

Conversion of Biomass Particles

MULTI-WASTE TREATMENT AND VALORISATION BY THERMOCHEMICAL PROCESSES. Francisco Corona Encinas M Sc.

PRODUCTION OF SYNGAS BY METHANE AND COAL CO-CONVERSION IN FLUIDIZED BED REACTOR

STUDIES ON NUCLEAR COAL GASIFICATION IN ARGENTINA

Simultaneously boosting the mass and fixed-carbon yields of charcoal from forest residue via atmospheric carbonization

Catalytic gasification of biomass for hydrogen production with in-situ CO 2 absorption using novel bi-functional Ni-Mg-Al-CaO catalyst

Carbon To X. Processes

Andre Bezanson Mech 4840

Biocharproduction: Basics, Facilities and Potentials

THE CHALMERS GASIFIER

Biomass to fuels! R.Stahl Institut für Technische Chemie IFC 2010 Mai 3 rd 6 th 2009 Dresden, Germany

Application of activated process char for gas treatment of biomass gasification producer gases

Green Fuel Nordic The Smart Way. Utilising RTP TM technology to produce sustainable 2 nd generation bio-oil from local feedstocks

INTEGRATED HEAT, ELECTRICITY AND BIO-OIL PRODUCTION. IEA Biomass Task 34 Meeting in Chicago Jani Lehto, Metso Pekka Jokela, UPM

Emissions from wood-fuelled equipment. Senior research scientist Heikki Oravainen Technical Research Centre of Finland

HYBRID STAGED THERMOLYSIS TO VALORISE BIOMASS Paul de Wild, March 11, 2009

Applications of the constrained Gibbs energy method in modelling thermal biomass conversion.

COMPARATIVE BEHAVIOUR OF AGRICULTURAL BIOMASS RESIDUES DURING THERMOCHEMICAL PROCESSING

Production of synthesis gas from liquid or gaseous hydrocarbons, and the synthesis gas per se, are covered by group C01B 3/00.

PYRENA PYRolysis Equipment for New Approaches to produce better bio-oil

The synthesis of novel carbon-based materials from

Thermochemical Studies of Relevance for Black Liquor Combustion and Gasification - The System Na 2 CO 3 -Na 2 S

We accept the challenge!

Flowsheet Modelling of Biomass Steam Gasification System with CO 2 Capture for Hydrogen Production

Lectio Praecursoria. Lappeenranta University of Technology. From the SelectedWorks of Kari Myöhänen

Modeling chemical and physical processes of wood and biomass pyrolysis

Modeling Biomass Gasification in a Fluidized Bed Reactor

Pyrolysis for Biochar Production

CFD MODELLING OF THE STEEL BELT SINTERING PROCESS

Synthetic fuels and chemical from biomass by the bioliq-process

Fluidised Bed Methanation Technology for Improved Production of SNG from Coal

STUDIES ON NUCLEAR HYDROGEN PRODUCTION BY STEAM COAL GASIFICATION IN ARGENTINA

Characterization of Coal and Biomass Conversion Behaviors in Advanced Energy Systems

MECHANISMS OF PYROLYSIS. Jim Jones

Fluidized Bed Combustion of Biomass and Waste-derived Fuels Current Status and Challenges

BTL2030 Project presentation. VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd Espoo, June 2017

LARGE-SCALE PRODUCTION OF FISCHER-TROPSCH DIESEL FROM BIOMASS

Microwave processing as a green and energy efficient technology for the production of energy and chemicals from biomass and energy crops

Fundamental oxy-fuel combustion research carried out within the ENCAP project

The hydrothermal decomposition of biomass and waste to produce bio-oil

GASIFICATION: gas cleaning and gas conditioning

Brown Coal and Biomass Gasification Research at Monash University Chemical Engineering

Synthetic Fuel Substitutes for Thermal Oxidizers Increased Sustainability, Reduced Natural Gas Consumption

Effectiveness of briquetting bio mass materials with different ratios in 10 kw down draft gasifier

WRI S PRE GASIFICATION TREATMENT OF PRB COALS FOR IMPROVED ADVANCED CLEAN COAL GASIFIER DESIGN

How do I make a basic combustion characterisation of biofuel?

The Effects of Increased Pressure on the Reaction Kinetics of Biomass Pyrolysis and Combustion

Smart CHP from Biomass and Waste

Dual Fluidized Bed Steam Gasification of Coal and Pyrolyzed Coal

GCE Environmental Technology. Energy from Biomass. For first teaching from September 2013 For first award in Summer 2014

Gasification of Municipal Solid Waste

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Thermal Processes. Examples for Gasification and Pyrolyses to Transportation Biofuels, Electricity and Heat

A NEW APPARATUS FOR FLAME SPREAD EXPERIMENTS

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 105 (2017 )

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF COAL PYROLYSIS AND GASIFICATION IN ASSOCIATION WITH SYNGAS COMBUSTION

Advanced Processes Analysis and Control Methods for CFB Power Plants Project Overview

EVALUATION OF THE POSSIBILITY TO UTILIZE BIOMASS IN FINNISH BLAST FURNACE IRONMAKING

Experimental Study on Combustion of Biomass in a Boiler with Gasification

Analysis of the Effect of Steam-to-Biomass Ratio in Fluidized Bed Gasification with Multiphase Particle-in-cell CFD Simulation

Evaluation of Pyrolysis and Steam Gasification Processes of Sugarcane Bagasse in a Fixed Bed Reactor

INDIRECT vs. DIRECT GASIFICATION

Development of Tar Removal Technologies for Biomass Gasification using the By-products

Biomass co-firing. Technology, barriers and experiences in EU. Prof.dr.ir. Gerrit Brem. TNO Science and Industry

S.E. (Chemical) (First Semester) EXAMINATION, 2012 PROCESS CALCULATIONS (2008 PATTERN) Time : Three Hours Maximum Marks : 100

Indirect gasification

Thermogravimetry Study on Pyrolysis of Various Lignocellulosic Biomass for Potential Hydrogen Production

DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ROURKELA , INDIA

Torrefaction Kinetics of Red Oak (Quercus rubra) in a Fluidized Reactor

Co-firing of biomass. Lecture on 10 th October Matti Nieminen VTT Technical research centre of Finland Ltd

CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PYROLYSIS AND GASIFICATION OFLOW-DENSITY POLYETHYLENE (LDPE)

BIOMASS GASIFICATION IN DOWNDRAFT REACTOR FOR POWER GENERATION

Verification of the Performance of Future Energy Resources SilvaGas Biomass Gasifier -- Operating Experience in the Vermont Gasifier

»New Products made of Synthesis Gas derived from Biomass«

Replacing coal with biomass fuels in combined heat and power plants in. Finland

GASIFICATION THE WASTE-TO-ENERGY SOLUTION SYNGAS WASTE STEAM CONSUMER PRODUCTS TRANSPORTATION FUELS HYDROGEN FOR OIL REFINING FERTILIZERS CHEMICALS

Technical Information Paper. (R)FCC Slurry Oil Filtration

Stability of fast pyrolysis bio-oils and upgraded products

What is Bioenergy? William Robinson B9 Solutions Limited

Cool Producing Systems Based on Burning and Gasification of Biomass

Slow Pyrolysis Of Imperata Cylindrica In a Fixed Bed Reactor

Lignite oxidative desulphurization. Notice 2: effects of process parameters

Molten Salt Reactors in Gasification and Gas Purification

Plastic to Fuel Technologies

VTT pilot plants for bio and circular economy

Response of soil respiration to the addition of chars - one way to estimate the stability of chars? Jürgen Kern, Giacomo Lanza

Working group Gasification & Gas Cleaning

Mini converter carbons and wastes for Biogas production and Energy Cogeneration model «ПТК-52»

Carbon Dioxide Conversions in Microreactors

Transcription:

TGA testing of biomass char gasification Antero Moilanen Finnish-Swedish Flame Days 2013 Gasification Workshop Paviljonki, Jyväskylä, 17th 18th of April 2013

2 Biomass fuel as feedstock Fuel is fed to the reactor Water (moisture) and volatiles are released (pyrolysis) rapidly Residual carbon reacts slower Reactions depend on the characteristics of biomass H 2 O Volatiles Char residue Ash 20 C 100 C ---- 600 C ---- 850 C

3 In TG, biomass char gasification is tested The achievement of total carbon conversion is influenced by the char gasification reactivity Char structure formed during pyrolysis: heating rate, temperature gaseous environment (steam, CO2, product gases) porosity Catalyst material (ash forming constituents) Chemical structure Surface area of the catalytic particulate material in contact with carbon Dispersion TG result (mass vs. time) includes all these phenomena as a summary Shape of the reaction rate vs. conversion graph (reactivity profile)

4 TG char gasification (cont.) Gasification studies published in literature are mainly directed to char prepared separately In the thermobalance, where fresh biomass is used as sample, the char is formed in situ and it is difficult to define the exact point, where char gasification starts (i.e char conversion = 0) The problematic point is situated in the phase where post pyrolysis and initial char gasification are overlapping.

5 TG char gasification (cont.) Heating rate, affects the char reactivity through char formation Various char formation reactions have more time during the slow heating leading to char having low reactivity Also the structure and chemistry of the inorganic catalytically active material is influenced by the heating rate. Heating rate should resemble the feeding to the hot gasifier Feedstock Fast heating rate: small particles and particle surfaces Slow: Cores of large particles ( pieces) In literature, it is often used separate char samples prepared with slow heating rate; the reactivity values obtained may not be usable for reactor design or modelling

6 TG char gasification (cont.) Other factors affecting char and its reactivity: Gaseous environment during pyrolysis Pressure Temperature Char formation mechanisms and its influence on reactivity are not actually well known

7 Test procedure in VTT s TG - 1 Reactivity measurements in TG are based on the sample weight change as a function of time at constant T (isothermal) and in the desired gas (pure reactants H2O, CO2, their mixture or mixed with product gas. Aiming at (pressurised) fluidised bed gasification Temperature level < 1000 ºC Pressure range 1 20 bar Sample size of 50-100 mg fresh dried biomass is put into a sample holder having a good gas - solid interaction without mass transfer effects Fast heating rate of the sample to the reaction temperature is essential. In TG tests in VTT, the sample is driven fast into the reactor conditioned with the reaction environment, i.e. temperature, pressure and gas. This input is arranged with a chain winch, which lowers the sample holder fast (within few seconds (abt 7s) into the hot reactor. During the input the sample heats up, pyrolyses and char is formed. Fast heating rate can also be achieved with a special jump mode of the reactor furnace (e.g. TA-instruments at SINTEF)

8 Test procedure in VTT s TG - 2 When the sample holder has reached the lowest position the weight recording starts Before the start of the weight monitoring, the sample has pyrolysed partly during the input. In the tests, it has been observed that sample still has raw unpyrolysed biomass at 15 seconds from the initiation of the weight reading. At 30 seconds no fresh biomass is seen, so it takes about 15 60 seconds for the completion of the pyrolysis to the char During the first 100s., there is overlapping char gasification and post-pyrolysis at 850ºC causing the sample weight loss. For this reason it is difficult read the exact point of the char conversion = 0

9 Sample holder Microbalance data acquisition PRESSURIZED THERMOBALANCE Pressure range 1-90 bar Temperature max = 1000 C He-flushing Ø16mm Expansion valve Filter Steam condenser Winch system Sample lock Reactor Thermocouple/ Pyrometer data acquisition Steam generator N 2 CO 2 H2 CO Water pump

10 Cylindrical sample holder with wire mesh Ø 16 mm reactor tube centre shaft Local gas circulation wire mesh 24 mm 17 mm Cup for comparison 11 mm Gas flow fuel sample 5 mm 10 mm View from the side View from the top (cross section)

11 Fast heating of sample in TG -1 Sample holder - Lowering of the sample to the reactor with a winch (abt 7 seconds) Hot reactor

12 Fast heating of sample in TG -2 - Jump mode in the heating of the furnace, example TA Instruments of SINTEF 5 4.5 4 1000 900 800 Real mass, mg 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 Mass Temperature 700 600 500 400 300 T,ºC 1 200 0.5 0 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Time, s 100

13 Slow heating rate, usual in TG Spruce bark N2 + CO2, 850ºC 10 1000 9 900 8 800 7 6 100K/min 700 600 Mass, mg 5 500 T ºC 4 400 3 2 CO 2 on 300 200 1 100 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 Time, s 0

14 TG curve, isothermal test VTT 100 80 Real mass, mg 60 40 20 Pine wood 1 bar H 2 O, 850 C Devolatilization, pyrolysis - In the same gas as the char reactivity is measured Char gasification 900 880 860 840 820 T, ºC Real mass,mg Spline mass, mg T,C 0 800 0 100 200 300 400 500 Time, s

15 WEIGHT AS A FUNCTION OF TIME, isothermal test Devolatilization - In the same gas as the char reactivity Weight, mg char gasification ash Reaction rate is calculated from the weight-time curve Time

16 Fuel conversion Fuel conversion, ash free = 100* Sample weight m2 % Sample weight ash weight Weight, mg m2 Ash Time, seconds

17 Reactivity: rate vs. conversion Weight, mg Char gasification rate m1- m2 t2 - t1 mg seconds m1 m2 Instantaneous char gasification rate m1- m2 1 ( t2 - t1) m2 s t1 t2 Time, seconds

18 Result:Instantaneous reaction as a function of fuel conversion; reactivity profile Instantaneous reaction rate %/min 500 400 300 200 100 0 char gasification pyrolysis 0 20 40 60 80 100 Fuel conversion, %

19 Char conversion zero, i.e. the starting point for char gasification Bark pellet Mönsterås 1 bar H2O 850 C 300.0 250.0 200.0 mass, mg 150.0 100.0 50.0 Area of the simultaneous post pyrolysis and char gasification 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 time, s

20 Char sample at 15 seconds at 850ºC Fresh biomass 500 m

21 0.02 Selection of the point where char conversion = 0 Instantaneous reaction rate, 1/s 0.015 0.01 0.005 Time from the beginning 30s 60s 100s 0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Char conversion, -

22 TG curve Mass- time curve obtained in TG includes all the phenomena of gasification Development of pore structure Char carbon properties Catalysis Changes in catalytic active material Reactions, evaporation, mobility Characteristic TG curve Different biomass (species) but also plant parts (bark, heart wood, stump)

23 Reaction rate vs. char conversion reactivity profile Instantaneous Reaction rate 0 1 Conversion Reactivity profile biomassspecific - increasing and decreasing trends - minimum rate

24 Reactivity profile - model Ref.:Umeki, K., Moilanen, A., Gómez-Barea, A., Konttinen, J., A model of biomass char gasification describing the change in catalytic activity of ash. Chemical Engineering Journal vol.207 208 (2012) 616 624. -works for CO2 gasification, steam needs to be developed

25 Gasification reactivity of various biomasses and tree parts Ref: Antero Moilanen & Muhammad Nasrullah. Fundamental studies of synthesis-gas pro-duction based on the fluidized bed gasification of biomass Project UCGFunda. Gasification reactivity and ash behaviour. Espoo 2010. VTT Publications 769.

26 Conditions in the fluidised bed gasification affecting char conversion and to be tested in TG Temperature 700-1000 C Pressure 1 20 bar (abs) H2 CO CO2 H2O H2 CO CO2 H2O (Fragmented and attrited char) Product gas -H 2,CO, CH 4 - tar -CO 2, H 2 O, N 2 - unreacted char In the reactor, there is char material (particles) at different conversion degree having different gasification reaction rates Fuel O 2 /H 2 O Accumulated char

27 Effect of temperature spruce bark, 1 bar, 100% H2O Instantaneous reaction rate, %/min 200 150 900 C 100 850 C 50 800 C 0 75 80 85 90 95 100 Fuel conversion (Ash free), %

28 Temperature dependence of gasification (steam) rates of various fuel chars Ea= ca. 210 kj/mol

29 Effect of pressure Spruce bark T = 850 C, 100% steam Instantaneous reaction rate, %/min 200 150 100 50 0 75 80 85 90 95 100 Fuel conversion (Ash free), % 10 bar 5 bar 1 bar

30 Effect of pressure (cont.) on steam and CO2 gasification r" min. (%/min) 150 100 50 0 Pine sawdust Pine bark Forest residue (pine) Salix Wheat straw Barley straw Reed canary grass Miscanthus Sweet sorghum Kenaf 30 bar H2O 1 bar H2O 30 bar CO2 1 bar CO2 Under pressure the reactivity higher in steam Biomass

31 Effect of product gas: Different biomasses in gas mixtures T= 875 C & total pressure 1 bar ( 0.3 bar H2O, 0.2 bar H2, 0.25 bar CO2, 0.15 bar Instantaneous reaction rate, %/min 200 150 100 50 0 CO & 0.1 bar N2) 75 80 85 90 95 100 Fuel conversion (Ash free), % = spruce bark 1 bar steam (100%) at 875 C for comparison Bark: Aspen Moilanen, A., Nasrullah, M. Variation in fuel Reactivity and ash characteristics of biomass feedstock for large-scale gasification. Pres. in 17th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition. 29 June - 3 July 2009, Hamburg, Germany Aspen bark (o) Spruce Spruce bark (o) Birch Birch bark (o) Pine Pine bark (o)

32 Product gases also inside the char pores char H 2 O H 2 O CO CO CO 2 CO 2 H 2 H 2 H 2 O CO H 2 CO 2

33 18.4.2013 Formulas Steam hydrogen : CO 2 - CO: Gas mixture: Temperature dependence 2 3 2 2 H2O 1 1 P H O H P r P r r R CO PCO r P r r R 6 2 5 CO2 4 1 P CO CO H O H P r P r P r P r r r R 6 2 5 2 3 2 2 CO2 4 H2O 1 1 P P RT E ke r i i /

34 Gasification reactivity of various biomasses steam 850 C 1 bar 30 bar Instantaneous Reaction Rate,%/min 150 Sawdust 100 (pine) 50 0 100 50 100 Wheat straw 50 0 80 90 100 500 100 Salix Reed canary grass 250 0 80 90 100 Pine bark 0 70 80 90 100 80 90 100 100 Barley straw 50 0 50 80 90 100 0 80 90 100 200 Miscanthus 100 0 100 0 80 90 100 200 Sweet sorghum 200 80 90 100 400 Kenaf 0 80 90 100 Fuel conversion, % Fuel conversion, %, % Fuel conversion, %, % 3 bar H 2 + 27 bar H 2 O

35 Classification of ash sintering/melting after a TG test under microscope powder o molten *** sintered * - **

36 TGA testing of biomass char gasification Summary Fast heating rate In the determination of the kinetic parameters for gasification reactions, the suitable testing conditions shoud be sought for each biomass The effect of pyrolysis conditions on char reactivity Temperature pressure - gaseous environment need to be studied and fixed for testing Char gasification tests in steam, CO 2, and their mixtures and product gas components H 2 and CO

37 TGA testing of biomass char gasification Acknowledgements: Financing 1. Nordic Energy Research Top-Level Research Initiative (Nordsyngas) 2. The Academy of Finland (GASIFREAC-project) Collaboration Prof. Kentaro Umeki LTU; Prof. Alberto Gómez-Barea Univ. Seville; Prof. Jukka Konttinen JYU; Mr. Jasob Kramb JYU; Dr. Liang Wang SINTEF; Prof. Rainer Backman UMU; Dr. Nikolai DeMartini ÅA; Mr. Jere Lehtinen VTT; Ms. Mirja Muhola VTT