ENVIRONMENTAL AUTHORIZATIONS FOR FEDERAL NAVIGATION AND PROJECTS

Similar documents
Navigating the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Process

Nationwide Permit General Conditions

WILMINGTON DISTRICT US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS REGULATORY DIVISION. US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG

THE CORPS REGULATORY AUTHORITY

PUBLIC NOTICE. Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344) Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C.

Public Review Draft Part III Guidelines for the Application of Criteria for Financial Assistance for Local Projects.

PUBLIC NOTICE US Army Corps of Engineers, Honolulu District

Joint Public Notice. LOCATION: In Salmon Bay, Lake Washington Ship Canal, at Seattle, Washington.

J O I N T P U B L I C N O T I C E

J O I N T P U B L I C N O T I C E

US Army Corps of Engineers

J O I N T P U B L I C N O T I C E

Public Notice of Application for Permit

6. The following paragraphs provide further interim guidance where the ACHP regulations are not specific to the Corps Regulatory Program:

CORPS REGULATORY PROGRAM

New Developments in Federal Wetlands Permitting

Compliance with the USEPAs Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines

PUBLIC NOTICE LOS ANGELES DISTRICT. APPLICATION FOR PERMIT Port of Los Angeles Berths : Wilmington Waterfront Promenade

Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council 1/30/02 Habitat Policy. This policy shall be supported by three policy objectives which are to:

J O I N T P U B L I C N O T I C E

Distribution Restriction Statement

NEPA OVERVIEW & ANALYSIS Environmental Law Workshop Loyola Law School/Sierra Club Angeles Chapter

NATIONWIDE PERMIT 32

Cross-Cutting Environmental Laws A Guide for Federal/State Project Officers

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT CORPS OF ENGINEERS PRINCESS PALM AVENUE, SUITE 120 TAMPA, FLORIDA

Mississippi Coastal Improvements Program (MsCIP) Comprehensive Barrier Island Restoration Plan

PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING AGENDA

Clean Water Act Regulatory Program

US Army Corps of Engineers. Permitting Process. Chad Konickson. Chief, Southwest Section St. Paul District Regulatory Branch.

SRF 101 SRF Cross Cutters: Understanding the Environmental

SAN FRANCISCO DISTRICT PUBLIC NOTICE PROJECT: San Francisco Marina West Harbor Maintenance Dredging

Regulatory Guidance Letter 93-02

The project will be conducted in partnership with the Nez Perce Tribe.

Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation Process Southeast Regional Office

Record of Decision for Issuing a Presidential Permit to Champlain Hudson Power Express,

ACTIVITIES AUTHORIZED BY 2012 NATIONWIDE PERMIT

OBTAINING A SMALLTOOTH SAWFISH SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH OR ENHANCEMENT PERMIT: Navigating the Process

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Reservoir Operations Maria Placht, Institute for Water Resources, USACE 49

J O I N T P U B L I C N O T I C E

Federal Regulation. Copyright 2011 Gary A. Robbins. All rights reserved.

PUBLIC NOTICE. Dredging with ten-years maintenance, return flow to the waterway and upland placement. Georgica Cove, tributary of Georgica Pond

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program in Georgia

General Permit No: NAE Final Effective Date: August 18, 2017 Applicant: General Public in NH Expiration Date: August 18, 2022

JOI NT PUBLIC NOTICE

Trails Permitting Process

PUBLIC NOTICE. REPLY TO: Denver Regulatory Office 9307 South Wadsworth Blvd 30 DAY NOTICE Littleton, CO FAX (303)

J O I N T P U B L I C N O T I C E

PUBLIC NOTICE PROJECT: Jack McNamara Field Airport (CEC) Runway Safety Area (RSA) Project

Notice of Intent to Prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Intake. Diversion Dam Fish Passage Project, Dawson County, Montana

J O I N T P U B L I C N O T I C E

2015 Red Book. Synchronizing Environmental Reviews for Transportation and Other Infrastructure Projects. September 2015

Environmental Laboratory

FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT (FONSI) Programmatic Environmental Assessment #556

CHESAPEAKE BAY COMPREHENSIVE WATER RESOURCES AND RESTORATION PLAN

PROSPECTS FOR COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED WATERSHED MANAGEMENT UNDER EXISTING LAW

Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Ecology and Transportation (ICOET 2013)

JOINT PUBLIC NOTICE. Paul Shealy Big Man's Marina, LLC 125 Big Mans Road Leesville, SC LAKE MURRAY

TIERING ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS MAY 11, 2017

Coastal Texas Protection and Restoration Project

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT. Programmatic Environmental Assessment #556

Overview of Permitting Framework Alaska North Slope Oil and Gas Activities

An Overview for Wetland Conservation & Management

Instructions for the SDDOT Categorical Exclusion Checklist and Environmental Commitments Checklist

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO COYOTE POINT MARINA 2017 MAINTENANCE DREDGING PROJECT COUNTY PROJECT NO. OD432 PROJECT FILE NO. E4953 ADDENDUM NO.

Instructions for the South Pacific Division Nationwide Permit Pre- Construction Notification (PCN):

JOINT PUBLIC NOTICE SAM PAH U. S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY OFFICE OF POLLUTION CONTROL

Public Notice. Applicant: City of Dallas Project No.: SWF Date: April 18, Name: Chandler Peter Phone Number:

APPENDIX F. SECTION 404(B)(1) EVALUATION SHORT VERSION. Herbert Hoover Dike Dam Safety Modification Study

Analysis of the City and Borough of Juneau Mining Ordinance. CBJ ; CBJ ; and October 12, 2017

Testing and Evaluation for Upland Placement of Dredged Material

Green River Diversion Rehabilitation

CESAM-RD-C April 24, 2013 PUBLIC NOTICE NO. SAM AFM JOINT PUBLIC NOTICE SAM AFM U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS

Environmental Assessment Appendix G: Coastal Zone Consistency. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers New York District

Solano Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan

1. Failure to Comply with NEPA

SAN LUIS VALLEY PUBLIC LANDS CENTER

Developing Ecological Offsets for U.S. Shale Plays: Five Years of Learning(s)

b. Projects Without PED Agreements. Credit for PED Coordination Team activities will be provided under the following criteria:

Atlantic Coast of New York East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, NY

Statement on Marine Transportation

MDOT SHA s NEPA/MEPA, Agency and Public Involvement Processes. Presentation to BRTB s Technical Committee August 1, 2017

Appendix G Draft Coastal Consistency Determination

U.S. Environmental Law and Oil & Gas Operations

Review of Civil Works Projects

PREFACE PREFACE. Red Rock. Project. Master Plan Project. Master Plan 2015

COMPENSATORY MITIGATION AND THE MITIGATION RULE. USACE, Jacksonville District

Executive Summary Page

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY EC U.S. Army Corps of Engineers CECW-CP Washington, D.C

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)

FOREST SERVICE MANUAL NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS (WO) WASHINGTON, DC

CHESAPEAKE BAY COMPREHENSIVE WATER RESOURCES AND RESTORATION PLAN. Habitat GIT Meeting 9 May 2017

What s Required for Permittee- Responsible Wetlands Mitigation? Steps and permittee perspective

Lower Snake River Programmatic Sediment Management Plan

Navigating the Environmental Compliance Process in Coastal California

ILF Instrument Development and Execution. The North Carolina Experience September 15, 2010

Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for Lower Green River Corridor Plan Request for Proposals:

INSTRUCTIONS FOR USING THE GENERAL PERMIT...i A. GENERAL DESCRIPTION AND FEES

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Mobile District

DECISION DOCUMENT NATIONWIDE PERMIT 40

Public Notice of Application for Permit

Transcription:

237 217 200 80 252 COASTAL 237 217 200 119 237 217 STORM 174 200 DAMAGE 27.59 REDUCTION 255 255 255 ENVIRONMENTAL AUTHORIZATIONS FOR FEDERAL NAVIGATION AND 0 0 0 163 163 163 131 132 122 PROJECTS 239 65 53 110 135 120 112 92 56 62 102 130 102 56 48 130 120 111 1 Prepared by Jenny Owens 11 January 2017 The views, opinions and findings contained in this report are those of the authors(s) and should not be construed as an official Department of the Army position, policy or decision, unless so designated by other official documentation.

TOPICS 2 Environmental Operating Principles Environmental Laws Fed vs. Non-Fed projects Section 408 Final Points

3 Environmental Operating Principles 1. Strive to Achieve Environmental Sustainability 2. Consider Environmental Consequences 3. Seek Balance and Synergy 4. Accept Responsibility 5. Assess and Mitigate Cumulative Impacts 6. Understand the Environment 7. Respect Other Views

ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS AFFECTING CORPS COASTAL PROJECTS 4 National Environmental Policy Act Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (USFWS) Clean Water Act (NCDWR/Corps) Coastal Zone Management Act (NCDCM) Marine Protection, Research & Sanctuaries Act (EPA) Coastal Barrier Resources Act (USFWS) Clean Air Act (State) Endangered Species Act (USFWS and NMFS) Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Management & Conservation Act (NMFS) Migratory Bird Treaty Act (USFWS) National Historic Preservation Act (SHPO) Etc

NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (NEPA) 5 CWA EFH MSFMCA NHPA ESA MPRSA CAA FWCA CZMA

NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT 1969 6 CEQ Master Regulations for all federal agencies 40 CFR 1500-1508 Promulgated in 1978 Corps-Specific Civil Works/Federal Projects 33 CFR 230 ER 200-2-2 Regulatory Permits 33 CFR 325 Appendix B (points back to 33 CFR 230)

National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 7 Applies to all Federal Actions Federal Projects Federal Funding Federal Permit or Authorization Requires Environmental Impact Statement or Environmental Assessment or Categorical Exclusion Emergency Procedures

8 NEPA is Different from other Environmental Laws Does not manage or protect one or more specific resources (unlike ESA, CWA, CAA, etc). Requires Federal agencies to CONSIDER and DOCUMENT the environmental impacts of their proposed actions as part of an agency s OVERALL planning and decision-making. Requires Federal agencies to cooperate with Federal, state and local governments, and other concerned public and private organizations and citizens during project planning. - Recent cooperating agencies BOEM and NPS

NEPA Relies heavily on other environmental laws, standards, policies, plans, programs, permits and conditions for decision criteria, monitoring, follow through, and enforcement; avoid, minimize, mitigate Federal officials are not required to adopt the most environmentally acceptable alternative; therefore NEPA imposes procedural, not substantive, decision making requirements. 9 Agency NEPA procedures must ensure that environmental information is available to public officials and citizens before decisions are made and before actions are taken. Requires full and open disclosure of all facts used in making the decision A court may reverse an agency's decision under NEPA if the agency s decision was: arbitrary capricious an abuse of discretion or otherwise not in accordance with process & law.

Compliance Federal vs. Non-Federal Projects 10 Coastal Zone Management Act Federal Consistency Determination and Concurrence from State (DCM) Non-Federal permit issued by DCM Coastal Barrier Resources Act (CBRA) No Federal funds may be expended in CBRA zone (navigation exception) - can t remove sand from a CBRA zone This constraint does not apply to non-feds Section 404 of Clean Water Act Corps does not issue itself 404 permits, but still complies w/ 404 Non-feds- required to obtain 404 permits for impacts to waters/wetlands Endangered Species Act (Section 7) Some Biological Opinions (NMFS & USFWS) apply to both Federal and Non-Federal projects (dredging and new programmatic beach BO) Sediment Compatibility (beaches) Federal projects criteria is 90% sand Non-Fed projects CRC sediment criteria

COMPLIANCE FINAL POINTS 11 Numerous environmental laws and regulations Projects involve many agencies and stakeholders Communication is key beginning (NEPA scoping) to project completion (50-year projects) Relationships, Trust, and Integrity are critical Sharing of Information

SECTION 408 12 33 USC 408 (Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1899) Engineer Circular (EC) 1165-2-216 Provides the Secretary of the Army authority to grant permission to alter a Corps civil works project if 1. Does not impair usefulness of the project 2. Not injurious to the public interest

PURPOSE OF EC 1165-2-216 13 Improve consistency in the way the Corps considers, processes, and documents decisions for requests for alterations to Civil Works projects. Create a process that is applicable to all types of Civil Works projects. Be transparent regarding what information is required. Create a process that can be tailored by districts to the appropriate scope, scale, and complexity of a proposed alteration.

SECTION 408 APPLIES TO: 14 All Corps Civil Works projects Alterations within real estate interests of a Corps project Actions that build upon, alter, improve, move, occupy, or otherwise could affect a Corps project dredging or beach renourishment by non-federal entities

SECTION 408 DOES NOT APPLY TO: 15 Routine operations and maintenance activities Shoreline Management and Master Planning Programs (Dams and Lakes- Landuse Review Process) Certain Real Estate Outgrants

BASIC STEPS 16 Step 1: Pre-Coordination Step 2: Written Request to Corps Step 3: Required Documentation (plans/analyses/nepa) Step 4: District Agency Technical Review Step 5: Summary of Findings (report) Step 6: Division Review, if required Step 7: HQ Review, if required Step 8: Notification by Corps Step 9: Post-Permission Oversight

COORDINATION WITH REGULATORY 17 When a Section 408 request also requires a other permits, such as Section 10 (navigable waters)/ Section 404 (wetlands) /Section 103 (MPRSA), close coordination throughout is required Section 10/404/103 decisions are separate decisions and require separate decision documentation Information should be leveraged between the two processes (Civil Works and Regulatory) Injurious to the public interest for Section 408 is not the same as contrary to the public interest for Section 10/404/103 Section 408 decision must be made before the Section 10/404/103 decision is issued

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE A Section 408 decision is a federal action and NEPA and other environmental compliance is required. Scope of analysis limited to the federal project areas that would be directly or indirectly affected by proposed alteration. NEPA documentation the requester s proposal will be identified as the requester s preferred alternative. Alternatives analysis is limited to 1) no action and 2) requester s preferred alternative. Categorical Exclusions may apply Leverage existing NEPA documentation

ROLE OF THE NON-FEDERAL SPONSOR Because non-federal sponsors are cost-share partners and/or have O&M responsibilities Section 408 requests must come from or have written concurrence of the non-federal sponsor If there are multiple sponsors, each sponsor must provide concurrence Written acknowledgment and acceptance of any new O&M requirements

KEY POINTS 20 Every Corps District has a Section 408 Coordinator Process is led by the Corps District office 408 process is intended to be scalable, based on the scope and scale of the proposed alteration Complex/large-scale 408s are funded by the requester Coordination throughout the process is encouraged Section 408 may be initiated by a letter to the District Commander or a Section 404 permit application Section 408 timeframe for completion varies depending on size/complexity of project. Minimum time = 30 days from receipt of all info required to render a decision 2 years+= complex, controversial projects

CLOSING POINTS 21 Open, honest (transparent), communication is key Sharing of Information is critical We can work through almost any obstacle/challengecollaborate, partner, mutual respect and understanding Greatest Challenge Declining (or $0) Federal funding for Federal navigation and CSDR projects & minimal funding for 408s

22 QUESTIONS? Jenny Owens US Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District 910-251-4757 Jennifer.l.owens@usace.army.mil