Design, Safety Technology and Operability Features of Advanced VVERs

Similar documents
Module 05 WWER/ VVER (Russian designed Pressurized Water Reactors)

Up-to-date issues of VVER Technology Development

Improvement of economic efficiency of the fuel usage in NPP. The new types of nuclear fuel and the fuel cycles

RELAP5/MOD3.2 INVESTIGATION OF A VVER-440 STEAM GENERATOR HEADER COVER LIFTING

Nuclear Power Plant Safety Basics. Construction Principles and Safety Features on the Nuclear Power Plant Level

INVESTIGATION OF CRITICAL SAFETY FUNCTION INTEGRITY IN CASE OF STEAM LINE BREAK ACCIDENT FOR VVER 1000/V320

RESULTS OF THE GRADUAL UPGRADING AT BOHUNICE WWER - 440/230 NPP

BN-1200 Reactor Power Unit Design Development

Preliminary Lessons Learned from the Fukushima Daiichi Accident for Advanced Nuclear Power Plant Technology Development

Project AES

Provision of containment integrity at Russian VVER NPPs under BDBA conditions

HPR1000: ADVANCED PWR WITH ACTIVE AND PASSIVE SAFETY FEATURES

Significant Events in Rostechnadzor Activity Regarding WWER-type NPPs Operation within the Period from September 2015 up to July 2016

EUR volume 3 AES 92 subset

DESIGN AND SAFETY PRINCIPLES LEONTI CHALOYAN DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER ON MODERNIZATION

Concepts and Features of ATMEA1 TM as the latest 1100 MWe-class 3-Loop PWR Plant

Czech Industry Cooperation with Rosatom CZECH INDUSTRY CAPABILITIES FOR ROSATOM NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION

NPP Simulators Workshop for Education - Passive PWR NPP & Simulator Overview

Westinghouse Small Modular Reactor. Passive Safety System Response to Postulated Events

RELAP 5 ANALYSIS OF PACTEL PRIMARY-TO-SECONDARY LEAKAGE EXPERIMENT PSL-07

SYSTEMATIC AND DESIGN SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS OF NPPS IN CZECH REPUBLIC

Design of Traditional and Advanced CANDU Plants. Artur J. Faya Systems Engineering Division November 2003

OperatiOn and safety report Of MOchOvce and BOhunice v2 nuclear power plants

SEVERE ACCIDENT FEATURES OF THE ALTERNATIVE PLANT DESIGNS FOR NEW NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS IN FINLAND

Implementation of Lessons Learned from Fukushima Accident in CANDU Technology

Rosatom offer in the field of operation, maintenance and modernization of NNP

PLUTONIUM UTILIZATION IN REACTOR FUEL

CAREM: AN INNOVATIVE-INTEGRATED PWR

CURRENT NUCLEAR POWER ISSUES IN RUSSIA

Nuclear Power Development in Europe: Rosatom perspective

Joint ICTP-IAEA Essential Knowledge Workshop on Deterministic Safety Analysis and Engineering Aspects Important to Safety. Trieste,12-23 October 2015

CAREM Prototype Construction and Licensing Status

Monitoring of the EU Stress test improvement actions in neighbouring countries

Nuclear Desalination Complex with VK-300 Boiling-Type Reactor Facility

Module 06 Boiling Water Reactors (BWR)

MAJOR FINDINGS OF PMK-2 TEST RESULTS AND VALIDATION OF THERMOHYDRAULIC SYSTEM CODES FOR VVER SAFETY STUDIES

NUCLEAR ENERGY MATERIALS AND REACTORS Vol. I - Pressurized Water Reactors - J. Pongpuak

In April 1986, unit 4 of the Chernobyl nuclear

WWER-440 CONTROL ASSEMBLY LOCAL POWER PEAKING INVESTIGATION ON LR-0 REACTOR

Assessing and Managing Severe Accidents in Nuclear Power Plant

Small Modular Reactors: A Call for Action

Rosatom Integrated Offer for Africa

Post-Fukushima Assessment of the AP1000 Plant

Safety enhancement of NPPs in China after Fukushima Accident

Rosatom Global Development, International Cooperation Perspective

Module 06 Boiling Water Reactors (BWR) Vienna University of Technology /Austria Atominstitute Stadionallee 2, 1020 Vienna, Austria

Verification of the MELCOR Code Against SCDAP/RELAP5 for Severe Accident Analysis

Status report Chinese Supercritical Water-Cooled Reactor (CSR1000)

ACR-1000: ENHANCED RESPONSE TO SEVERE ACCIDENTS

THREE MILE ISLAND ACCIDENT

WWER Fuel Performance and Modelling Activities in Bulgaria

APR1400 Safe, Reliable Technology

Nuclear Power A Journey of Continuous Improvement

Green Cross Russia Nuclear and Radiation Safety Programme. V. M. Kuznetsov Contemporary state of safety at Russian nuclear installations

Safety Implication for Gen-IV SFR based on the Lesson Learned from the Fukushima Dai-ichi NPPs Accident. Ryodai NAKAI Japan Atomic Energy Agency

RELAP5/MOD3.2 ASSESSMENT STUDIES BASED ON THE PACTEL AND PMK-2 LOSS OF FEED WATER TESTS

NPP Personnel Training Center

Experiments Carried-out, in Progress and Planned at the HTR-10 Reactor

NuScale SMR Technology

Present Status of Kyoto University Research Reactor, KUR

Pakistan s Experience in Operating CNP-300s and Near Term Deployment Scheme

Design Safety Considerations for Water-cooled Small Modular Reactors As reported in IAEA-TECDOC-1785, published in March 2016

NON-ELECTRICITY APPLICATION OF NUCLEAR ENERGY: SOME GENERAL ISSUES AND PROSPECTS

APPROACH TO PRACTICAL ELIMINATION IN FINLAND

Evolution of Nuclear Energy Systems

European level recommendations Sect. in NAcP 2 Generic recommendation for WENRA, Finland participates and follows the work.

Expert Statement on the

DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION OF PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT PSA IN DAYA BAY NUCLEAR POWER STATION

Risks Associated with Shutdown in PWRs

Analysis of Unprotected Transients in the Lead-Cooled ALFRED Reactor

Isolation Condenser; water evaporation in the tank and steam into the air. Atmosphere (in Severe Accident Management, both P/S and M/S)

The Westinghouse Advanced Passive Pressurized Water Reactor, AP1000 TM. Roger Schène Director,Engineering Services

Status of the FRM-II Project at Garching. Hans-Jürgen Didier, Gunter Wierheim Siemens AG, Power Generation (KWU), D Erlangen

The Evolution of System Safety in the Canadian Nuclear Industry

German contribution on the safety assessment of research reactors

OKBM AFRIKANTOV SMALL MODULAR REACTORS ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS FOR SAFETY PROVISION

Introduction to Level 2 PSA

Controlled management of a severe accident

SUMMARY OF SE NNEGC ENERGOATOM PERFORMANCE IN POST-FUKUSHIMA PERIOD

2017 Water Reactor Fuel Performance Meeting September 10 (Sun) ~ 14 (Thu), 2017 Ramada Plaza Jeju Jeju Island, Korea

Summary. LOCA incidents: Gas and liquid metal cooled reactors. List of LOCA incidents: 3-4

LEAD-COOLED FAST-NEUTRON REACTOR BREST. Yu.G. Dragunov, V.V. Lemekhov, A.V. Moiseyev, V.S. Smirnov (NIKIET, Moscow, Russia)

COLD NEUTRON SOURCE AT CMRR

EXPERIMENTS ON THE PERFORMANCE SENSITIVITY OF THE PASSIVE RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL SYSTEM OF AN ADVANCED INTEGRAL TYPE REACTOR

The ESBWR an advanced Passive LWR

NUCLEAR POWER NEW NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS IN 2012

CNE Cernavoda Response to Fukushima Event/EU Stress Test Requirements

Preparedness at PFBR Kalpakkam to meet the challenges due to Natural events Prabhat Kumar, Project Director, PFBR, Director construction BHAVINI

ASTEC Model Development for the Severe Accident Progression in a Generic AP1000-Like

A Research Reactor Simulator for Operators Training and Teaching. Abstract

NUCLEAR SMALL MODULAR REACTOR

EPR: Steam Generator Tube Rupture analysis in Finland and in France

High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactors Now More Than Ever!

CAREM-25: a Low-Risk Nuclear Option. Rivera, S.S. and Barón, J.H.

Next and Last Generation of Nuclear Power Plants Paul Howarth

GT-MHR OVERVIEW. Presented to IEEE Subcommittee on Qualification

This description was taken from the Advances in Small Modular Reactor Technology Developments 2016 Edition booklet.

Bulatom Conference June 2017 Ludek Urban & Vit Sousek. ŠKODA JS Casks for SNF & HAW

DESIGN, SAFETY FEATURES & PROGRESS OF HTR-PM. Yujie DONG INET, Tsinghua University, China January 24, 2018

Transcription:

Technical Cooperation Project INT/4/142 Interregional Workshop on Advanced Nuclear Reactor Technology for Near Term Deployment IAEA Headquarters, Vienna, Austria, 4-8 July 2011 Design, Safety Technology and Operability Features of Advanced VVERs Presented by Nikolay Fil OKB GIDROPRESS Russian Federation

2 Introduction OKB GIDROPRESS has been established in 1946 to develop designs of nuclear steam supply system (NSSS) and separate equipment for nuclear installations. Some milestones: 1947 Research heavy water reactor 1954 Steam generator for 1st NPP 1963 Lead-bismuth NSSS for submarine 1964 - First VVER-210 1965 Boiling water reactor VK-50 1969 Fast sodium reactor BOR-60 1971 First VVER-440 1980 First VVER-1000 Now VVER-440 and VVER-1000 are in operation in Russia, Ukraine, Armenia, Finland, Bulgaria, Hungary, Czech Rep., Slovakia, China. Now VVERs of 300-1800 MWe, VVER-SCP, sodium BN-800/1200 steam generator, lead-bismuth SVBR-100 are under development. Visit http://www.gidropress.podolsk.ru for details.

Introduction What is VVER ВВЭР: водо-водяной энергетический реактор WWER: water-cooled water-moderated energy reactor Pressurized light water reactor. Loop-type reactor plant. Horizontal steam generators. Hexagonal fuel assemblies. High level of inherent safety. About 1500 reactor-years of operating time 3

VVER evolution Low and medium power designs (1955 1975) RP design RP type Site (units) Status V-1 VVER-210 NVNPP (1) DCOM V-2 VVER-70 NPP «Rheinesberg» (1) DCOM V-3М VVER-365 NVNPP (2) DCOM V-179 VVER-440 NVNPP (3,4) SLE V-230 VVER-440 Kola NPP (1,2), NPP «Kozloduy» (1-4), NPP «Nord» (1-4), NPP «Bohunice» (1,2) SLE DCOM V-270 VVER-440 Armenian NPP UO V-213 VVER-440 Kola NPP (3,4), Rovno NPP (1,2), UO NPP «Loviisa» (1,2), NPP «Paks» (1-4), NPP «Bohunice» (3,4), NPP «Mochovce» (1,2), NPP «Dukovany» (1-4), NPP «Nord» (5) DCOM 4

VVER evolution High power designs (1966 2003) RP design RP type Site (units) Status V-187 VVER-1000 NVNPP (5) SLE V-302 VVER-1000 South Ukraine NPP (1) UO V-338 VVER-1000 South Ukraine NPP (2), Kalinin NPP UO (1,2) V-320 VVER-1000 Balakovo NPP (1-4), Zaporozhe NPP UO (1-6), Rovno NPP (3,4), Khmelnitsk NPP (1,2), South Ukraine NPP (3), Rostov NPP (1,2), NPP «Temelin» (1,2), Kalinin NPP (3), NPP «Kozloduy» (5,6) V-392 VVER-1000 - D V-446 VVER-1000 NPP «Bushehr» (1) COM 5

VVER evolution Current designs (2000 2007) RP RP type Site (units) Status design V-392B VVER-1000 Balakovo NPP (5) D V-412 VVER-1000 NPP «Kudankulam» (1,2) UC V-428 VVER-1000 Tianwan NPP (1,2) UO V-407 VVER-640 - D V-466B VVER-1000 NPP «Belene» (1,2) D V-392М VVER-1200 NVNPP-2 (1,2) UC V-491 VVER-1200 LNPP-2 (1-4), BaltNPP (1,2) UC D V-448 VVER-1500 - D VVER-1200 is also a starting point for future VVER designs of 600-1800 MWe power. 6

VVER evolution VVER-1200 Basic design VVER-1200A 300 MWe per loop 600 MWe per loop VVER-600 VVER-1800 7

VVER evolution Future designs RP design RP type Site (units) Status V-498 VVER-600 - CtP V-501 VVER-1200А - CtP VVER-1800 - CtP V-393 VVER-SCP - CtP 8 Abbreviations used: SLE service life extended; COM commissioning; CtP concept proposal; D design is developed; DCOM decommissioned; UC NPP under construction; UO under operation.

NPP-2006 basis Now VVER-1200 (also known as NPP-2006) is the main design for near term nuclear power program in Russia and for bidding at international market. NPP-2006 is the evolution of VVER-1000s by improving plant performance and increasing plant safety. Plant performance Rated power 1170 (1000) MWe Primary pressure 16.2 (15.7) MPa Secondary pressure 7.0 (6.3) MPa Coolant temperature 329 (320) C Refueling period 24 (12) months Burn-up in FA 70 (50) MWD/kgU Plant safety Passive reactor scram system Passive core flooding system Passive decay heat removal system Passive containment cooling system Passive hydrogen removal system Passive corium catcher 9

NPP-2006 basis Reference plants for NPP-2006 design: Operating standard VVER-1000 with V-320 AES-91 with V-428 Tianwan NPP AES-92 with V-392 Kudankulam NPP (V-412) LNPP-2 (VVER-1200/V-491) NVNPP-2 (VVER-1200/V-392M) EUR organization has certified in 2007 that AES-92 design has passed all the steps of the analysis of compliance vs. EUR. Following this analysis, a specific subset of the EUR volume 3 dedicated to AES-92 project has been published by EUR organization. 10

NPP-2006 performance Parameter Value NSSS equipment lifetime, years 60 Load factor, % 92 NSSS availability factor 99 Efficiency factor, net % 35.7 Length of fuel cycle, years 4-5 Frequency of refueling, months 12 (18-24) FA maximum burn-up, MW day/kgu 70 Inter-repair period length, years 4-8 Refueling length, days 16 Number of unplanned reactor shutdowns per year 1 11 For more details http://aris.iaea.org

Reactor NPP-2006 equipment 7 1 In-core instrumentation detectors 2 Top head unit 3 Protective tube unit 4 Core barrel 5 Core baffle 6 Core 7 Reactor pressure vessel 12 No welds in core region No joints below cold leg

NPP-2006 equipment Core Fuel assembly Top nozzle Spacer grid Fuel rods 13 163 fuel assemblies of to 5% enrichment. To 121 control rods. Bottom nozzle 312 fuel rods. 18 guide channels. 13 spacer grids.

NPP-2006 equipment Steam generator Cylindrical vessel of 4200 mm internal diameter, 13820 mm long with welded elliptical bottoms. 10978 HX U-tubes of 16x1.5 mm. 14

NPP-2006 equipment Pressurizer Parameter Value Total volume, m 3 79 Water volume, m 3 55 Pressure, MPa 16,1 Temperature, C 348 15 15

NPP-2006 equipment Main coolant pump Head 0.59 Mpa Flow rate 21500 m 3 /h Speed 1000/750 rot/min Current 50 Hz Massive flywheel ensures smooth reduction of flow rate in case of loss of power. No coolant leakage in case of loss of power min 24 (72) hours. 16

NPP-2006 safety Parameter Frequency of severe core damage, 1/year Frequency of the limiting emergency release, 1/year Autonomy time of passive safety systems, hour Design basis earthquake, MSK-64 scale Safe shutdown earthquake, MSK-64 scale Value < 10-6 < 10-7 24 (72) 6 7(8) 17

NPP-2006 safety Novovoronezh NPP-2 Leningrad NPP-2 ECCS active part Emergency boron injection system High and low pressure combined twochannel system with ejector pumps with internal redundancy of main safety functions Two-channel system with channel redundancy 2 х 100 % and internal channel redundancy 2 х 50 % High and low pressure separate four-channel systems with channel redundancy 4 х 100 %, each Four-channel system with channel redundancy 4 х 50 % Emergency feedwater system SG emergency cooldown system Core passive flooding system (HA- 2) Passive heat removal system (PHRS) Closed two-channel system with redundancy 2 х 100 % Passive four-channel system with channel redundancy 4 х 33 % with two accumulators in each channel Passive four-channel system with channel redundancy 4 х 25 % with two heat exchangers, cooled by air, in each channel Not available Four-channel system with channel redundancy 4 х 100 % with emergency feedwater storage tanks Not available Not available Passive four-channel system with channel redundancy 4 х 33 % with 18 heat exchangers, cooled by water, in each channel 18 Passive systems are provided to back-up the active systems for all main safety functions (reactivity control, fuel cooling and confinement of radioactivity) during min 24 (72) hours.

NPP-2006 safety Emergency boron injection system ГЕ ГЕ ГЕ ГЕ - injection into PRZ in case of primary-to-secondary leak for fast decrease of primary pressure - injection into primary circuit to shutdown reactor in case of failure of reactor scram (ATWS) - pumps of 24.5 Mpa shut-off head are connected to tanks with 40 g/kg boric acid concentration 150 m 3 each. 4 3 --- 1 2 19

NPP-2006 safety Active ECCS in NVNPP-2 High and low pressure combined system with ejector pumps is intended for boric acid solution supply into reactor coolant system within the whole spectrum of design basis LOCAs up to DEGB of 850 mm main coolant pipeline. 4 3 ГЕ ГЕ ГЕ ГЕ --- 1 2 20 Parameters Value P HPIS max. head MPa 8 P LPIS max. head MPa 2,5 G LPIS max. supply, m 3 /h 900 C Н 3 ВО 3 concentration,g/kg 16

NPP-2006 safety Active ECCS in LNPP-2 Separate 4-trains high and low pressure injection systems are intended for boric acid solution supply into reactor coolant system within the whole spectrum of design basis LOCAs up to DEGB of 850 mm main coolant pipeline. channel 4 4 3 channel 3 ГЕ ГЕ ГЕ ГЕ channel 1 --- 1 2 channel 2 21 Parameter Value P HPIS max. head, MPa 7,9 G HPIS max. supply, m 3 /h 260 P LPIS max. head, MPa 2,5 G LPIS max. supply, m 3 /h 900 C Н 3 ВО 3 concentration, g/kg 16

NPP-2006 safety Passive part of ECCS Passive part of emergency core cooling system is intended for boric acid solution supply into the reactor at the primary pressure less than 5,9 MPa under LOCA till start of active ECCS. 4 3 HA ГЕ HA ГЕ HA ГЕ HA ГЕ --- 1 2 22 Parameters Value P Nominal pressure, MPa 5,9 C Н 3 ВО 3 concentration, g/kg 16 V Accumulator/solution volume, m 3 60 / 50

NPP-2006 safety Additional passive ECCS in NVNPP-2 design prevents progression of a LOCA to severe core damage in case of failure of active ECCS during min 24 hours. Flow rate law verified by scaled Experiments. ГЕ ГЕ ГЕ ГЕ Time, s Flow, kg/s To 5430 To 10860 To 29000 To 86400 10,0 5,0 3,3 1,6 4 3 --- 1 2 23 Water inventory 120x8 m 3 Design pressure 3.0 MPa Pressure of connection 1.5 MPa

NPP-2006 safety Emergency cool down system via steam generators in NVNPP-2 design is intended for removal of decay heat and RP cool down in case of loss of normal and auxiliary feed water supply. 4 3 канал 2 1 2 24 Parameter Value Channel power, MW 80 Temperature of condensate, С 40-70 Max. flow rate to one SG, t/h 200 Control of cool down rate Available

NPP-2006 safety Emergency cool down system via steam generators in LNPP-2 design is intended for removal of decay heat and RP cool down in case of loss of normal and auxiliary feed water supply. 4 3 канал 3 канал 4 канал 1 канал 2 1 2 25 Parameter Value G Flow rate from one EFWP, t/h 150 T Emergency feed water temperature, С 5-40 N Number of storage tanks 2 + 1 V Tank volume, m 3 700 D Control cool down rate via BRU-A Available

NPP-2006 safety Passive decay heat removal system via steam generators in NVNPP-2 design is intended for reactor core decay heat removal to ultimate heat sink (atmosphere) through the secondary side during beyond design basis accidents (e.g., station blackout) 4 3 канал 3 канал 2 1 2 Parameter Value System power, MW 64(at +38 С) Number of HX in each channel 2 Control of cooling medium flow rate Available Air temperature range, С -37 +38 26

NPP-2006 safety Passive decay heat removal system via steam generators in LNPP-2 design is intended for decay heat removal through the secondary side during beyond design basis accidents (e.g., station blackout). 4 3 1 2 Parameters Value Q System power, MW 200 V Water inventory, m 3 4 х 540 τ Time of operation, hour 24 27

NPP-2006 safety Passive containment cooling system in LNPP-2 design is intended for long-term condensation of steam from containment atmosphere. 1 This system shares the offcontainment water storage tanks with passive decay heat removal system via steam generators. 7 2 3 4 5 6 28 1 tank; 2 steam line; 3 condensate line; 4 SG PHRS valve; 5 HX of containment PHRS; 6 steam generator; 7 cut-off valve

NPP-2006 safety The core catcher in NPP-2006 design provides corium confinement and exclude corium discharge outside the containment in any scenario. - Protects the reactor cavity against thermal and mechanical impact of corium -Takes in and accommodates solid and liquid corium constituents -Ensures formation of optimal structure and properties of the melt pool and subsequent solidification of corium. - Provides heat sink from corium to cooling water passively supplied min 24 h without any coolant makeup. - Provides corium retention - Minimises hydrogen and radionuclide release into containment on ex-vessel phase of a core melt scenario. 29

NPP-2006 safety Core catcher long term cooling provisions 1 - reactor; 2 core catcher; 3 fuel pool; 4 inspection vault for in-vessel components; 5 sump tanks; 6 pipeline supplying water onto corium surface; 7 pipeline supplying water to core catcher heat exchanger 30

NPP-2006 safety Passive catalytic recombiners are provided in NPP-2006 design to remove hydrogen from containment atmosphere 31

Conclusion VVER-1200 is developed as the main design for near term nuclear power program in Russia and for bidding at international market. VVER-1200 is the evolution of operating VVER-1000s by improving plant performance and increasing plant safety. VVER-1200 design is a basis for future VVER designs of wide power range. Passive systems are designed for VVER-1200 to back-up fulfillment of all main safety functions. These systems are capable to prevent typical BDBA progression to Fukushima-like scenarios. The viability of new passive systems implemented in VVER-1200 design is confirmed by extensive R&D works. A few nuclear power plants are already in operation and under construction with these systems implemented. 32