Cement-Lock SM Technology for Decontaminating Dredged Sediment

Similar documents
A LEADING PROVIDER OF CLEAN ENERGY SOLUTIONS

Alter NRG Plasma Gasification: Environmental Performance

Operational Results from the Transportable Plasma Waste-to-Energy System at Hurlburt Field s Air Force Special Operations Command

Utilization of a Pneumatic Tube Mixing Technique for Processing and Stabilization of Contaminated Dredged Material

WESTINGHOUSE PLASMA GASIFICATION. Hazardous Waste Management

COUNTY OF NEVADA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY NEVADA COUNTY CDA GUIDELINES FOR ASH AND BURN DEBRIS CLEAN UP AND REMOVAL AFTER A FIRE

Material Characterization Report

APPENDIX E: TOOL FOR EVALUATING STORMWATER DATA. Section 1 Basis for Using the Charts as a Screening Tool

BURLINGTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOLID WASTE WASTE CLASSIFICATION REQUEST FORM AND INSTRUCTIONS

GASIFICATION THE WASTE-TO-ENERGY SOLUTION SYNGAS WASTE STEAM CONSUMER PRODUCTS TRANSPORTATION FUELS HYDROGEN FOR OIL REFINING FERTILIZERS CHEMICALS

The Release of Base Metals During Acidic Leaching of Fly Ash

Lower Passaic River, Newark Bay and NY/NJ Harbor: Dredged Material Management (DMM) of Dioxin Contaminated Sediments

On-Site Incineration at the Bridgeport Refinery and Oil Services Superfund Site Logan Township, New Jersey

GENERAL PERMIT WMGR098 BENEFICIAL USE OF WASTE FOUNDRY SAND AND SAND SYSTEM DUSTS

This is a draft revision of the briefing, and any comments are welcome please them to Becky Slater on

Waste Discharge Permit Application. for. Commercial, Industrial and Institutional Discharges

Use of Lime Activated Class F Fly Ash for Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) of Asphalt Pavements

Driving ISM Laboratory Processing Selection with Project Goals

The Growth of Dry Sorbent Injection (DSI) and the impact on Coal Combustion Residue

Coal Ash Material Safety

Other Water Treatment Plant Residuals Dewatering Equipment: An Investigation of Screw Press Technology. Lynn Williams, P.E. (WA)

WESTINGHOUSE PLASMA GASIFICATION

ASCE Geotechnical Division Specialty Conference Grouting, Soil Improvement and Geosynthetics New Orleans, Louisiana February 25-28, 1992

Wastewater Sludge Recycling/Reuse in Japan

SITE Technology Capsule

Metal and Particulate Emissions from Incinerators Burning Sewage Sludge and Mixed Refuse

Mass Stabilization Virgin & Contaminated Soil / Sediment

WHERE DO THE PRETREATMENT PERMIT LIMITS COME FROM??? Amy Varinoski City of Mebane

WASTE INCINERATION PLANTS IN AUSTRIA WITH DATA ON WASTE MANAGEMENT IN VIENNA

ASH MANAGEMENT PLAN. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 4, Atlanta, GA. Mr. Joe Alfano, Remedial Project Manager

The Determination of Toxic Metals in Waters and Wastes by Furnace Atomic Absorption

Presented at the SafeSpur Forum 18 November 2009, Chorley

Notification of Department of Industrial Works

Self-Sustaining Treatment for Active Remediation (STAR): Overview and Applications of the Technology

COAL, OIL SHALE, NATURAL BITUMEN, HEAVY OIL AND PEAT Vol. II -Environmental Impacts of Oil Shale and Pollution Control Technologies - J. Q.

Inventaire Report Information Report ID: Report Year: 2008 Programs Included:npri. Facility Information.

COMPOSTING OF FATS, OIL, AND GREASE. Joel E. Alpert, Ph.D. Compost And Technology Solutions, Inc.

Excerpt of Thermal Power Guidelines for New Plants

Pilot Study Report. Z-92 Uranium Treatment Process

Compost Utilization Quality Guidelines in Tomato Production. Monica Ozores-Hampton, Ph.D University of Florida/IFAS/SWFREC

FORM 26R CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF RESIDUAL WASTE ANNUAL REPORT BY THE GENERATOR INSTRUCTIONS GENERAL INFORMATION

PROJECT UPDATES. Westinghouse Plasma Commercialized; Industrial Scale Syngas Production

LEAF Method Testing of MGP-impacted Sediments in Gowanus Canal

MANAGEMENT OF SONOMA COUNTY WILDFIRE DEBRIS

Compliance Measurements. Mike Klein & Robert Kettig BTS (609)

WEF Residuals and Biosolids Conference 2017

Environmental impact of incineration of calorific industrial waste in a rotary kiln and in a cement kiln. A comparison.

SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO GUIDE LECO CORPORATION 3000 Lakeview Avenue St. Joseph, MI Mr. Dennis Lawrenz Phone:

Demeter Association Inc. Commercial Composting Standard

Module 12: Oceanography Topic 6 Content: Ocean Pollution Notes. Ocean Pollution

Emission Criteria for Biomedical Waste Incinerators

Water Quality Permitting Program Monitoring Matrix 1,2,3

SORBACAL SPS - CHANGING PERCEPTIONS ON HYDRATED LIME FOR SO 2 REMOVAL AND ESP IMPACTS

Water and Waste Water Management in Yangon, Myanmar

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) One-Time Shipment Request for Texas Waste Code For Shipment of Hazardous and Class 1 Waste

Water Chemistry. Water 101

Port Angeles Harbor Sediments Investigation Community Meeting. Peter defur, Ph.D. Laura Williams Environmental Stewardship Concepts, LLC May 7, 2012

Iron Mountain Mine Shasta County, California

Comparison of Dry Sorbent Injection of Sodium Bicarbonate, Lime, and Carbon and Their Control of Dioxins/Furans, Mercury, Chlorides and Sulfur Dioxide

Name of Process: Vendor: Applicable Pesticides and related POPs wastes: Technology description:

Midwest Analytical Services, Inc. "Where industry comes for answers." PRICE LIST 2009

Appendix C. Chemical Extraction Bench-Scale Study Evaluation

CUSTOMER AUDIT HANDBOOK CORPORATE OVERVIEW

Bioremediation Using DARAMEND for Treatment of POPs in Soils and Sediments

ENERGY AND MATERIALS FROM WASTE AND BIOMASS The role of WTERT France

JEDDAH INDUSTRIAL CITY

In Situ Chemical Reduction for Organic Explosives in Soil

Co-processing of AFR in Indian cement industry- NCB experiences

Application of CFB (Circulating Fluidized Bed) to Sewage Sludge Incinerator

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL AND GAS DIVISION

4.0 SAN GABRIEL RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT AREA

8/4/2015. PHG Energy Means Industrial Grade. Chris Koczaja VP of Engineering and Implementation. Clean Energy Conversion.

EXPORT SOIL-MATERIAL QUALITY REQUIREMENTS

Westinghouse Plasma Gasification is the Next Generation of Energy from Waste Technology. USEA Annual Meeting May 30, 2013 Washington, DC

Polyurethane. Polyurethane Recycling and Recovery. Options for Polyurethane Recycling and Recovery

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS REVISED REPORT

January 25, 2016 VIA (HARD COPY TO FOLLOW BY U.S. MAIL)

APPROVED ALTERNATIVE DAILY COVER MATERIALS FOR USE AT SANITARY LANDFILLS

9. INCORPORATION OF BIOAVAILABILITY INTO RISK ASSESSMENT AND RISK MANAGEMENT

Updated Ambient Concentrations of Toxic Chemicals in San Francisco Bay Sediments

Beneficial Reuse of Dredge Materials for Agriculture and Revegetation Presented by: Mike Baker, Environmental Manager Woodrow Wilson Bridge Project

Guidance on use of Disposal and Recovery Codes (Waste Management Act, 1996 as amended)

2017 Air Emissions Testing FAQs

Borough of Hopewell, New Jersey

Urban Area Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Study Tiered Approach to Corrective Action Objectives

Sonoma County Complex Fires Health Screening Level Guidance, Cleanup Goals and Background Data Sets

REPORT NUMBER REPORT DATE SEND TO ISSUE DATE Apr 18, Apr 18, 2017 RECEIVED DATE Apr 05, 2017

Checklist of Common Critical Data Issues:

RE: Split Ash Sample Results October 2017 Charah Brickhaven Facility

Alternative and Clean Fill Guidance for Site Remediation Program Sites. Teruo (Terry) Sugihara

Solid Waste to Energy

Section [ ] Storm Water Treatment Device

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

The Chemical Industry and Climate Change. A Snapshot from India

Lowering The Total Cost Of Operation

REACTION TANKS ADVANCED MEMBRANE FILTRATION

APPENDIX D MECHANICAL DEWATERING EVALUATION (ADDENDUM 4)

Halogens, dioxins/furans

HELIOSOLIDS FLUIDIZED BED INCINERATOR

Transcription:

Cement-Lock SM Technology for Decontaminating Dredged Sediment Amir Rehmat, Anthony Lee Gas Technology Institute Michael Mensinger, Anil Goyal ENDESCO Services, Inc. Fall 2000 ITRC Conference October 18, 2000

Cement-Lock SM Technology An advanced thermo-chemical manufacturing process for decontaminating dredged sediments, soils, wastes, and sludges and transforming these wastes into resources: Sediment is transformed into constructiongrade cement Organic contaminants are destroyed with DRE s > 99% Heavy metals are immobilized in the cement matrix

Cement-Lock SM Technology Description STEAM SEDIMENT FUEL AIR/O 2 MODIFIERS ECOMELT GENERATOR 2400-2600 F SECONDARY COMBUSTION ADDITIVE HEAT RECOVERY GAS CLEAN UP CLEAN FLUE GAS ECOMELT QUENCH PULVERIZER/ MIXER High Quality CONSTRUCTION- GRADE CEMENT

Cement-Lock SM Technology Supporters U.S. EPA Region 2 Brookhaven National Laboratory U.S. Army Corps of Engineers U.S. EPA Region 5 / GLNPO MI Dept. of Env. Quality NJ Office of Maritime Resources NJ Dept. of Transportation GRI Unitel Technologies, Inc. Private Corporations

Cement-Lock SM Technology Applications Harbor & river sediments MGP site soils Brownfield soils, debris Superfund site soils Military BRAC wastes, debris Municipal solid wastes & sludges Petroleum sludges Tank / tanker bottoms Spent molecular sieves, etc. Coal ash, etc.

Cement-Lock SM Technology -- Wastes Tested Dredged estuarine sediments Dredged river sediments Municipal solid waste MSW incinerator ash Contaminated concrete Coal fly ash Coal bottom ash Oil-contaminated soil PCB-contaminated soils U-containing wastes

Technology Development Status for Dredged Sediment Bench-scale data with Newtown Creek (NY) sediment - WRDA (COE/EPA2/BNL) and Black Lagoon (Detroit River) sediment - MI-DEQ Pilot-scale (1-ton/day) data with Newtown Creek sediment and contaminated soil - WRDA (COE/EPA2/BNL), private sector Demo plant (30,000-150,000 cy) for dredged sediment currently under construction for NJ - WRDA (COE/EPA2/BNL), NJ-MR, private sector

Technology Development Status for Dredged Sediment Demo plant (2,000-5,000 cy) for Black Lagoon (Detroit River) sediment - EPA5, GLNPO, MI-DEQ, private sector Engineering completed for 100,000 cy/yr plant module and 500,000 cy/yr plant Cost for complete dredged sediment-tocement production plant (1 module of 100,000 cy/yr capacity) is $20 million.

Independent Data Verification Organic Contaminant Destruction Triangle Laboratories, Durham, NC Metals Immobilization Triangle Laboratories, Durham, NC Air Sampling Data AirNova, Pennsauken, NJ

Cement-Lock SM is Very Effective in Destroying Organic Contaminants Contaminant ------ Estuarine Sediment ------ ---------- River Sediment ---------- Untreated Cement Untreated Cement Sediment Product Destruction Sediment Product Destruction ----- mg/kg (dry) ----- --%-- ----- mg/kg (dry) ----- --%-- Oil & Grease - - - - - - 18,000 < D.L.* > 99.99 PAHs 370 0.22 99.93 51.2 < D.L. 99.99 ------ m g/kg (dry) ----- ------ m g/kg (dry) ------ PCBs 8,585 < D.L. > 99.99 1,100 < D.L. > 99.99 ----- ng/kg(dry) ----- Dioxins/Furans 2,3,7,8 TCDD/F 262 < D.L. > 99.99 Other TCDD/F 2,871 < D.L. > 99.99 PeCDD/F 4,363 < D.L. > 99.99 Hx/Hp/OCDD/F 34,252 < D.L. > 99.99 * Below the analytical method detection limit.

Cement-Lock SM is Very Effective in Immobilizing Inorganic Contaminants Metal Untreated Material Estuarine Sediment River Sediment Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure Cement Produced From Estuarine River Regulatory Sediment Sediment Limit ------ mg/kg (dry) ------ -------------------- mg/l -------------------- Arsenic 39 7.8 < 0.005* < 0.01 5 Cadmium 27 9.5 < 0.001 < 0.002 1 Chromium 298 138 0.15 < 0.072 5 Copper -- 180 -- < 0.01 -- Lead 542 218 < 0.002 < 0.01 5 Mercury 2.9 0.55 < 0.0004 < 0.0004 0.2 Selenium 6.2 -- < 0.003 -- 1 Silver 13 -- < 0.001 -- 5 * Analytical method detection limit.

Cement-Lock SM Pilot-Scale Unit

Ecomelt produced during pilot-scale testing

Cement-Lock SM Technology Pilot-Scale Air Emissions Flue Gas Composition* Outlet CO2, mol % 8.1 CO, ppm 25 HCl, ppm 14.2 NOx, ppm 67.7 SO 2, ppm 44.1 Total Hydrocarbons, ppm 10.6 PCBs < 1.1 x10-6 lb/hr Pesticides < 2.8 x 10-7 Chlorobenzenes/Chlorophenols < 6.8 x 10-5 SVOCs BDL** Total 2,3,7,8-CDDs (TEF) < 4.0 x 10-12 Total 2,3,7,8-CDFs (TEF) < 8.1 x 10-12 Particulates, grains/dscf < 2.0 x 10-4 Particulate Phase Composition PCBs < 5.3 x 10-7 Total 2,3,7,8-CDDs (TEF) < 8.0x10-12 Total 2,3,7,8-CDFs (TEF) < 7.3x10-13 * Adjusted to 7% oxygen ** Below detection limit, some phthalate compounds detected

Cement Certification & Testing Construction Technology Laboratories, Inc. (CTL, Skokie, IL, subsidiary of Portland Cement Association) Prairie Cement Group (Chicago, IL, cement manufacturer) New Jersey Department of Transportation (NJ-DOT, public project applications) Sor Testing Laboratories (Cedar Grove, NJ, cement/concrete testing services for NJ/NY area)

Compressive Strength of Cement from Sediment and Debris Compressive Strength, psi 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 3 Days 7 Days 28 Days 28-day portland cement requirement: 4060 psi 0 Estuarine Sediment River Sediment Concrete Debris Feedstock

Compressive Strength of Cement from Ash Compressive Strength, psi 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 3 Days 7 Days 28 Days 28-day portland cement requirement: 4060 psi CF1* CF2* CF3* CB1* CB2* CB3* MSW1** Formulations *Cement made from grinding various formulations of Ecomelt with 75 wt% additives. **Cement made from grinding Ecomelt with 60 wt% additives.

Compressive Strength of Cement from Contaminated Soils Compressive Strenght, psi 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 28-day portland cement requirement: 4060 psi 3 Day 7 Day 28 Day 0 Petroleum Contaminated Soils Soils Contaminated with 9,100 ppm of PCB Equivalent MSW Feedstock

Comparison of Trace Elements in Cement- Lock SM Cement & Portland Cement Element Cement-Lock Cement Portland Cement* ---------- Range ---------- -------------------------- mg/kg -------------------------- Mercury < 0.07** < 0.001 0.039 Selenium < 0.94 0.62 2.23 Cadmium 1.59 0.03 1.12 Lead 35.8 1 75 Silver 2.66 6.75 19.9 Arsenic 9.22 5 71 Barium -- 91 1402 Chromium 196 25 422 Nickel 133 15 129 * Portland Cement Association, 1992 ** Below analytical detection limit

Factors Affecting Technology Performance Factor Moisture content Variations in type & quantity of organic contaminants Variations in type & quantity of heavy metals Sediment quality (clayey, loamy, sandy) Sediment particle size Effect No effect No effect No effect No effect No effect

Factors Affecting Technology Economics Factor Moisture content Non-steady supply Use of alternate fuels (sewage sludge and/or refinery tank bottoms) Non-continuous batch processing of sediment aliquot Effect Affects quantity of cement / revenues Larger storage required - affects capital costs Considerably reduces sediment treatment costs Capital attributed to batch increases processing cost

Logistical & Regulatory Requirements Permit requirements - similar to those for manufacturing process plants Air permit required Net water user - No process water discharge permit needed Large-scale plant (>500,000 cy/yr) incorporates engineered transportation and logistics system so that dredged sediment is moved from the channel to the cement market seamlessly

Logistical & Regulatory Requirements Small-scale plant (<100,000 cy/yr) is compartmentalized - specifically for final cement production, which is accomplished at off-site location Flexible with respect to siting in terms of site preparation and utility requirements

Net Cost of Sediment Treatment - 3 Scenarios 1. Dedicated 500,000 cy/yr sediment treatment facility; 20-year life span; fueled by natural gas; cement commanding the same price as portland cement. 2. Dedicated 500,000 cy/yr sediment treatment facility; 20-year life span; fueled by sewage sludge and/or refinery tank bottoms; cement commanding the same price as portland cement. 3. Case 2 except with cement commanding 50% of the price of portland cement.

Unit Processing Costs for a 500,000 yd 3 /year Capacity Plant Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Credits ---------------------- $1000 s ---------------------- Sale of Cement ($70/ton) $17,440 $23,100 $11,550 Tipping Fees From Other Wastes -- 18,810 18,810 Total Credits $17,440 $41,910 $30,360 Expenses Labor $930 $930 $930 Raw Materials 3,470 4,035 4,035 Utilities 12,110 6,055 6,055 Maint./Misc. 5,775 5,775 5,775 Total Expenses $22,285 $16,795 $16,795 Provision for Lease $1,500 $1,500 $1,500 Depreciation $10,500 $10,500 $10,500 Net Processing Cost $16,845 ($13,115) $1,565 Break-Even Tipping Fee, $/yd 3 $33.69 ($26.23) $3.13 Case 1: 100% harbor sediment feed Case 2: 75% harbor sediment feed + 25% other waste feed Case 3: Case 2 except cement sale price reduced by 50%

Commercial Readiness All equipment is commercially available Vendors are willing to provide turnkey plants: ABB, Svedala, Andersen 2000 Pilot plant data sufficient for detailed design and construction

Commercial Readiness Modular plant construction 100,000 cy/y modules Modules can be added as needed Additional environmental and cement utilization data will be generated at the NJ demo facility

Cement-Lock SM Technology -- Summary Simple, one-step method for processing large volumes of sediment, soil, MSW, etc. with practically no restrictions on their content. All processing equipment is commercially available. No development required Provides a permanent solution for disposing of dredged sediment Favorable economics Tipping/processing fees Finished product sales (ASTM quality construction-grade cement) Industrial wastes co-processing