mortarless Design Manual Part 1 (AS 3600:2009) Section 1 Page 1 AS 3600:2009 PLAIN AND REINFORCED CONCRETE - CODE OF PRACTICE

Similar documents
Pronto Block Walls. Structural Design Manual AS 3600:2009. masonry. style and function

SECTION 1. AS MASONRY STRUCTURES CODE

DESIGN OF WALLS FOR SHEAR

Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 2017

A Guide for the Interpretation of Structural Design Options for Residential Concrete Structures

Page 53 pren (Final draft)

Introduction to Structural Analysis TYPES OF STRUCTURES LOADS AND

Strength Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures

CHAPTER 11: PRESTRESSED CONCRETE

Modelling of RC moment resisting frames with precast-prestressed flooring system

Code Requirements for Nuclear Safety-Related Concrete Structures (ACI ) and Commentary An ACI Standard

5.4 Analysis for Torsion

Distribution of Forces in Lateral Load Resisting Systems

Technical Notes 24G - The Contemporary Bearing Wall - Detailing [Dec. 1968] (Reissued Feb. 1987) INTRODUCTION

Advance Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures CE-5115

In-plane testing of precast concrete wall panels with grouted sleeve

Reinforced Concrete Design. A Fundamental Approach - Fifth Edition

14.1 PCI Standard Design Practice

Comparative Study of R.C.C and Steel Concrete Composite Structures

Chapter. Masonry Design

4.2 Tier 2 Analysis General Analysis Procedures for LSP & LDP

Seismic Detailing of RC Structures (IS: )

DATA SHEET 3 Concrete Masonry Lintels MARCH 2013

2012 IBC/2011 MSJC MASONRY CODE COMPILATION

SEAU 5 th Annual Education Conference 1. ASCE Concrete Provisions. Concrete Provisions. Concrete Strengths. Robert Pekelnicky, PE, SE

DESIGN OF GRAVITY-LOAD RESISTING FRAMES FOR SEISMIC DISPLACEMENT DEMANDS

Recommendations for additional fire protection of structural elements

Ground + 4 floor RCC frame structure in Goa Floor to floor height is 3.0m Plan dimension, 24.0 m x 13.5 m SBC = 20 t/sqm, hard Strata is consider for

UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON WESTERN INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FZE. BEng (HONS) CIVIL ENGINEERING SEMESTER ONE EXAMINATION 2015/2016

PERFORMANCE STUDY OF RETROFITTED GRAVITY LOAD DESIGNED WALL FRAME STRUCTURES (SC-140)

Precast Concrete Bearing Wall Panel Design (Alternative Analysis Method) (Using ACI )

Deformation Capacity of RC Structural Walls without Special Boundary Element Detailing

Hyperstatic (Secondary) Actions In Prestressing and Their Computation

Types of Foundations

> 0. 1 f, they are treated as beam-columns.

NON-LINEAR STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ANALYSIS

INHERENT DUCTILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE SHEAR WALLS WITH NON-SEISMIC DETAILING

Scientific Seminar Design of Steel and Timber Structures SPbU, May 21, 2015

Tolerances for Concrete Construction. Tolerances for Concrete Construction. Tolerance 6/16/2015

Technical Guidance Document TGD-021-6

Bijan Khaleghi, Ph, D. P.E., S.E.

EARTHQUAKE DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS OF BUILDINGS. By Ir. Heng Tang Hai

7.1 Transmission of Prestress (Part I)

Diaphragms 2. Design Process. Design Process. Diaphragms are the roofs and floors of the upper stories

Renovation of Buildings using Steel Technologies (ROBUST)

3.5 Tier 1 Analysis Overview Seismic Shear Forces

8.0 Structural strengthening

IJSRD - International Journal for Scientific Research & Development Vol. 4, Issue 05, 2016 ISSN (online):

Transactions, SMiRT-22 San Francisco, California, USA - August 18-23, 2013 Division V

KSK COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING CE 2505-DESIGN OF RC ELEMENTS QUESTION BANK

DUCTILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR BUILDINGS

Section A A: Slab & Beam Elevation

CIVIL BREADTH Exam Specifications

Design and Construction of the SH58 Ramp A Flyover Bridge over IH70. Gregg A. Reese, PE, CE, Summit Engineering Group, Inc.

Design Guide Handbook for EN 1996 Design of Masonry Structures

Nonlinear Finite Element Modeling & Simulation

Case Studies in Structural Engineering

WATER RESEARCH COMMISSION. KSA 1: Water Resource Management. Thrust 2: Management of Natural and Human-induced Impacts on Water Resources

Council on Tall Buildings

CHAPTER 7: SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATES

Unit 48: Structural Behaviour and Detailing for Construction. Limit State Design

Displacement Based Assessment and Improvement of a Typical New Zealand Building by an Average Engineer

IJSRD - International Journal for Scientific Research & Development Vol. 2, Issue 07, 2014 ISSN (online):

Structural behaviour and failure mechanisms of concrete monoblock railway sleepers

Lecture Retaining Wall Week 12

Structural Tests and Special Inspections Form. Inspection of Fabricators (1704.2)

SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF SIX STOREYED RC FRAMED BUILDING WITH BRACING SYSTEMS

Special Reinforced Concrete Structural Walls

fib publications - Pr.November 2017:

Technical Notes 39A - Testing for Engineered Brick Masonry - Determination of Allowable Design Stresses [July/Aug. 1981] (Reissued December 1987)

Practical Nonlinear Analysis for Limit Design of Reinforced Masonry Walls

CVEN 483. Structural System Overview

Substructure systems, specifically retaining walls

How to Design a Singly Reinforced Concrete Beam

REPORT HOLDER: FASTENING SPECIALISTS, INC. 726 CENTRAL FLORIDA PARKWAY ORLANDO, FLORIDA EVALUATION SUBJECT:

DIVISION: MASONRY SECTION: CONCRETE UNIT MASONRY REPORT HOLDER: 3B CONSTRUCTION SOLUTIONS, INC.

Behavior of Concrete-Filled FRP Tubes Under Bending, Axial Loads, and Combined Loading. Amir Fam, Bart Flisak and Sami Rizkalla

VTU EDUSAT PROGRAMME Lecture Notes on Design of Stair cases

Tips For Designing Constructable Concrete Buildings

Reinforced Concrete Tilt-Up Wall Panel Analysis and Design (ACI 551)

CH. 9 WOOD CONSTRUCTION

Structural Glossary. ARCH 631 Structural Glossary F2014abn

Design Example 2 Reinforced Concrete Wall with Coupling Beams

Session 3: Precast Concrete Stairs and Ramps

Review of Elastic Bending Theory Fully Plastic Moment

The Hashemite University Department of Civil Engineering. Dr. Hazim Dwairi. Dr. Hazim Dwairi 1

Schöck Isokorb type CV

Introduction to Earthquake Engineering Behaviour of structures under earthquakes

Table of Contents.2. Introduction...3 Gravity Loading and Deflections..4. Existing Structural System..8

Jerome J. Connor Susan Faraji. Fundamentals of Structural. Engineering. ^ Springer

TITEN HD Heavy Duty Screw Anchor for Concrete & Masonry

PORTAL FRAMES 1.0 INTRODUCTION

LATERAL LOAD BEHAVIOR OF UNBONDED POST-TENSIONED HYBRID COUPLED WALLS. Qiang SHEN Graduate Research Assistant. Yahya C. KURAMA Assistant Professor

Non Linear Analysis of Composite Beam Slab Junction with Shear Connectors using Ansys.16

DESIGN FOR PROGRESSIVE COLLAPSE 1

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Volume 3, No 1, 2012

HIGH PERFORMANCE REINFORCEMENT PRODUCTS. Product Catalogue.

DIRECT DESIGN METHOD DDM

xiii Preface to the Fifth Edition Preface to the Second Edition Factors for Conversion to SI Units of

Transcription:

SECTION 1. mortarless Design Manual Part 1 (AS 3600:2009) Section 1 Page 1 AS 3600:2009 PLAIN AND REINFORCED CONCRETE - CODE OF PRACTICE 1.1 Overview of AS 3600:2009 AS 3600:2009 is the latest Australian Standard for the design of reinforced concrete. This is a 208 page document covering all aspects of the design of reinforced and prestressed concrete structures and members. The Standard is arranged in the following Sections: SECTION1. SCOPE AND GENERAL 1.1 Scope and application 1.2 Normative references 1.3 Existing structures 1.4 Documentation 1.5 Construction 1.6 Definitions 1.7 Notation SECTION 2. DESIGN PROCEDURES, ACTIONS AND LOADS 2.1 Design procedures 2.2 Design for Strength 2.3 Design for serviceability 2.4 Actions and combinations of actions SECTION 3. DESIGN PROPERTIES OF MATERIALS 3.1 Properties of Concrete 3.2 Properties of reinforcement 3.3 Properties of tendons 3.4 Loss of prestress in tendons 3.5 Material properties for non-linear structural analysis SECTION 4. DESIGN FOR DURABILITY 4.1 General 4.2 Methods of design for durability 4.3 Exposure classification 4.4 Requirements for concrete for exposure classifications A1, A2, B1, B2, C1 and C2 4.5 Requirements for concrete for exposure classification U 4.6 Abrasion 4.7 Freezing and Thawing 4.8 Aggressive soils 4.9 Restrictions on chemical content of concrete 4.10 Requirements for cover to reinforcing steel and tendons SECTION 5. DESIGN FOR FIRE RESISTANCE 5.1 Scope 5.2 Definitions 5.3 Design performance criteria 5.4 Fire resistance periods (FRPs) for beams 5.5 Fire resistance periods (FRPs) for slabs 5.6 Fire resistance periods (FRPs) for columns 5.7 Fire resistance periods (FRPs) for walls 5.8 Increase of fire resistance periods (FRPs) by use of insulating materials

mortarless Design Manual Part 1 (AS 3600:2009) Section 1 Page 2 SECTION 6. METHODS OF STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS 6.1 General 6.2 Linear elastic analysis 6.3 Elastic analysis of frames incorporating secondary bending moments 6.4 Linear elastic stress analysis 6.5 Non-linear frame analysis 6.6 Non-linear stress analysis 6.7 Plastic methods of analysis 6.8 Analysis using strut-and-tie models 6.9 Idealised frame method of analysis 6.10 Simplified methods of flexural analysis SECTION 7. STRUT-AND-TIE MODELLING 7.1 General 7.2 Concrete struts 7.3 Ties 7.4 Nodes 7.5 Analysis of strut-and-tie models 7.6 Design based on strut-and-tie modeling SECTION 8. DESIGN OF BEAMS FOR STRENGTH AND SERVICEABILITY 8.1 Strength of beams in bending 8.2 Strength of beams in shear 8.3 Strength of beams in Torsion 8.4 Longitudinal shear in composite and monolithic beams 8.5 Deflection of beams 8.6 Crack control of beams 8.7 Vibration of beams 8.8 T-beams and L-beams 8.9 Slenderness limits for beams SECION 9. DESIGN OF SLABS FOR STRENGTH AND SERVICEABILITY 9.1 Strength of slabs in bending 9.2 Strength of slabs in shear 9.3 Deflection of slabs 9.4 Crack control of slabs 9.5 Vibration of slabs 9.6 Moment resisting width for one-way slabs supporting concentrated loads 9.7 Longitudinal shear in composite slabs SECTION 10. DESIGN OF COLUMNS FOR STRENGTH AND SERVICEABILITY 10.1 General 10.2 Design procedures 10.3 Design of short columns 10.4 Design of slender columns 10.5 Slenderness 10.6 Strength of columns in combined bending and compression 10.7 Reinforcement requirements for columns 10.8 Transmission of axial force through floor systems SECTION 11. DESIGN OF WALLS 11.1 General 11.2 Design procedures 11.3 Braced walls 11.4 Effective height 11.5 Simplified design method for walls subject to vertical compression forces 11.6 Design of walls for in-plane shear forces 11.7 Reinforcement requirements for walls

mortarless Design Manual Part 1 (AS 3600:2009) Section 1 Page 3 SECTION 12. DESIGN OF NON-FLEXURAL MEMBERS, END ZONES AND BEARING SURFACES 12.1 General 12.2 Strut-and-tie models for the design of non-flexural members 12.3 Additional requirements for continuous concrete nibs and corbels 12.4 Additional requirements for stepped joints in beams and slabs 12.5 Anchorage zones for prestressing anchorages 12.6 Bearing surfaces 12.7 Crack control SECTION 13. STRESS DEVELOPMENT OF REINFORCEMENT AND TENDONS 13.1 Stress development in reinforcement 13.2 Splicing of reinforcement 13.3 Stress development in tendons 13.4 Coupling of tendons SECTION 14. JOINTS, EMBEDDED ITEMS AND FIXINGS 14.1 Joints 14.2 Embedded items 14.3 Fixings SECTION 15. PLAIN CONCRETE PEDESTALS AND FOOTINGS 15.1 General 15.2 Durability 15.3 Pedestals 15.4 Footings SECTION 16. SLAB-ON-GROUND FLOORS, PAVEMENTS AND FOOTINGS 16.1 General 16.2 Design considerations 16.3 Footings SECTION 17. MATERIAL AND CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS 17.1 Material and construction requirements for concrete and grout 17.2 Material and construction requirements for reinforcing steel 17.3 Material and construction requirements for prestressing ducts, anchorages and tendons 17.4 Construction requirements for joints and embedded items 17.5 Tolerances for structures and members 17.6 Formwork APPENDICES A B C Referenced documents Testing of members and structures Requirements for structures subject to earthquake actions BIBLIOGRAPHY

1.2 Scope of AS 3600:2009 mortarless Design Manual Part 1 (AS 3600:2009) Section 1 Page 4 AS 3600:2009 sets out the minimum requirements for the design and construction of plain and reinforced concrete structures and members. For the purposes of the Standard plain concrete structures are those where the reinforcement, if provided, is ignored for the determination of strength of the structure or member. This is precisely the approach taken for the design of mortarless walls in compression. When designing mortarless members to AS 3600, the masonry units are merely considered permanent shuttering units that contribute just a little to the strength of the member. When making calculations for the load tables and diagrams in this manual a small portion of the face shells of the masonry units has been taken as acting in compression and bending. The design thickness of the wall is the overall width of the core fill grout and this is tabulated in Section 1 of Parts 2a, 2b and 3. It is this width that has also been used when calculating slenderness ratios. The core fill concrete in any wall must be of compressive strength at least equal to the unconfined compression strength of the blocks even though that is considered to be possibly conservative. For the purposes of the strength calculation in the design aids in this manual it has been assumed that the grout f c is at least equal to the strength of the blocks. Grout of greater strength however may be used. 1.3 Design procedures AS 3600 Section 2 outlines the requirements for design procedures, actions and loads. Clause 2.1 sets out the requirements when designing for strength and serviceability, earthquake actions, robustness, durability and fire resistance. Clause 2.1.1 states that structures shall be designed for ultimate strength and serviceability limit states in accordance generally with the provisions of AS/NZ 1170.0 and the specific requirements of AS 3600 Clauses 2.2 and 2.3. The limit state method has been used in the generation of all tables and other design aids in this manual. 1.3.1 Design for strength Clause 2.2 outlines the various options for designing members and structures for strength. It is mentioned in Clause 2.2.1 that it is permissible to use different strength check procedures for different members in the one structure, and the structure as a whole, provided it can be shown that all external actions and forces and calculated internal stress resultants are consistent with the requirements for equilibrium and compatibility of the entire structure. Clause 2.2.2 states that the strength check procedure for use with linear elastic methods of analysis, with simplified methods of analysis, and for statically determinate structures shall be that R d E d Where R u is the ultimate strength of a member R d is the design capacity (= ΦR u ), and E d is the design action effect This condition must be satisfied at all critical cross sections and regions.

mortarless Design Manual Part 1 (AS 3600:2009) Section 1 Page 5 The capacity reduction factors Φ are given in Table 2.2.2 and these are summarized below for members with Class N reinforcement: Type of action effect Capacity reduction factor Φ Axial tension without bending 0.8 Axial compression without bending 0.6 Bending without axial compression or tension 0.6 (1.19-13k uo /12) 0.8 Bending with axial tension Refer AS 3600Table 2.2.2 Bending with axial compression where N u N ub 0.6 Bending with axial compression where N u < N ub Refer AS 3600Table 2.2.2 Shear 0.7 Bearing 0.6 The ultimate strength of a member (R u ) is to be determined in accordance with AS 3600 using characteristic values for material strengths. The design action effect (E d ) is to be determined for critical combinations of factored actions specified in AS 1170.0 and AS 3600 Clause 24 by one of the following methods of analysis: Linear elastic analysis in accordance with AS 3600 Clause 6.2 Linear elastic analysis incorporating secondary bending moments due to lateral joint displacement in accordance with AS 3600 Clause 6.3 One of the simplified methods of analysis in accordance with AS 3600 Clauses 6.9 and 6.10. Equilibrium analysis of a statically determinate structure. For strength checks using other methods of analysis refer to AS 3600 Clauses 2.2.3 2.2.6, 6.1.1 6.1.3 and 6.2 6.10. 1.3.2 Design for serviceability Clause 2.3.1 notes that it is a general requirement that design checks shall be carried out for all appropriate service conditions to ensure the structure will perform in a manner appropriate for its intended function and purpose. There are no limiting values given for the deflection of walls but limiting values for the deflection of beams are given in Table 2.3.2. Clause 2.3.2 b) states that members shall be designed such that under serviceability design loads the deflections shall not exceed the deflection limits given in Table 2.3.2. It further states that the deflection may be controlled by limiting the span to depth ratios in accordance with Clause 8.5 for beams and Clause 9.3 for slabs. Clause 2.3.3 states that cracking shall be controlled such that structural performance, durability and appearance are not compromised. These rules do not generally apply to walls. 1.3.3 Design for robustness Clause 2.1.3 requires that concrete structures be designed to be robust in accordance with the procedures and criteria given in AS 1170.0 Section 6.

mortarless Design Manual Part 1 (AS 3600:2009) Section 1 Page 6 AS 1170.0 Section 6 requires structures to be detailed such that all parts of the structure are tied together in both the horizontal and vertical planes so that the structure can withstand an event without being damaged to an extent disproportional to the event. It is further stated in Clause 6.2.1 that this requirement applies to non-structural components as well. This is a condition that can be readily be satisfied with load bearing mortarless construction, but a condition that is often not satisfied in column and beam structures and in traditionally detailed residential/domestic structures. AS 1170.0 Clause 6.2.5 states that: Walls shall be connected to the structure to provide horizontal resistance to face loads. The connection between the walls and the structure shall be capable of resisting the forces of 5% of G. It should be borne in mind that this requirement applies to interconnection of the walls to all structural elements including the footings. 1.3.4 Design for durability and fire resistance Clause 2.1.4 requires concrete structures to be designed such that they are durable in accordance with the procedures and criteria given in Section 4, and such that they are fire resistant in accordance with the procedures and criteria given in Section 5. 1.4 Design Actions All permanent, imposed and other actions are to be in accordance with AS 1170.1 All wind actions are to be in accordance with AS 1170.2 All earthquake actions are to be in accordance with AS 1170.4 All combinations of actions are to be in accordance with AS 117.0 Section 4 1.4.1 Combinations of actions for Strength Limit State Basic combinations: i) E d = 1.35G permanent action only ii) E d = 1.2G + 1.5Q permanent and imposed action iii) E d = 1.2G = 1.5Ψ l Q permanent and long term imposed action iv) E d = 1.2G + W u + Ψ c Q permanent, wind and imposed action v) E d = 0.9G + W u permanent and wind action reversal vi) E d = G + E u + Ψ E Q vii) E d = 1.2G + S u + Ψ c Q permanent, earthquake and imposed action permanent action, actions given in AS 1170.0 Clause 4.2.3 and imposed action where G, Q, W u and E u are the permanent action, imposed action, ultimate wind action, and ultimate earthquake action respectively, and where for distributed imposed actions Q Ψ c and Ψ l = 0.4 for domestic, office, parking, retail floors = 0.6 for storage and other floors = 0.4 for trafficable roofs = 0.0 for non-trafficable roofs

mortarless Design Manual Part 1 (AS 3600:2009) Section 1 Page 7 Ψ E = 0.3 for domestic, office, parking, retail floors = 0.6 for storage and other floors = 0.3 for trafficable roofs = 0.0 for non-trafficable roofs Refer to AS 1170.0 Table 4.1 for the factors applicable to concentrated imposed actions. Refer to AS 1170.0 Clause 4.2.3 for S u. 1.4.2 Combinations of actions for Stability Limit State For combinations that produce net stabilizing effects (E d,stb ): E d,stb = 0.9G permanent action only For combinations that produce net destabilizing effects (E d,dst ): i) E d,dst = 1.35G permanent action only ii) E d,dst = 1.2G + 1.5Q permanent and imposed action iii) E d,dst = 1.2G + W u + Ψ c Q permanent, wind and imposed action iv) E d,dst = G + E u +Ψ E Q permanent, earthquake and imposed action v) E d,dst = 1.2G + S u + Ψ c Q permanent action, actions given in AS 1170.0 Clause 4.2.3 and imposed action 1.4.3 Combinations of actins for Serviceability Limit State For short-term and long-term effects, combinations that include one or more of the following: i) G ii) Ψ s Q iii) Ψ l Q iv) W s v) E s vi) Serviceability values of other actions, as appropriate. Where Ψ s and Ψ l are the short-term and long-term imposed action factors respectively, which are given in AS 1170.0 Table 4.1 1.5 Structural properties 1.5.1 Characteristic compressive strength of mortarless walls The adopted value for the compressive strength of the composite masonry unit and the core fill concrete is the characteristic compressive (cylinder) strength of the core fill concrete but not greater than the unconfined compressive strength of the masonry face shells. Note that the minimum cylinder strength of the core fill concrete (grout) is to be not less than the unconfined compressive strength of the face shells of the blocks.

mortarless Design Manual Part 1 (AS 3600:2009) Section 1 Page 8 1.5.2 Characteristic yield strength of reinforcing steel, f sy The design tables in this manual are based on the use of reinforcing steel with a characteristic yield strength of 500 MPa 1.5.3 Elastic Moduli The modulus of elasticity of the core fill grout (E c ) at 28 days is as follows (Clause 3.1.2): E c = 20,500 MPa for 15MPa Grout E c = 24,000 MPa for 20MPa Grout E c = 26,700 MPa for 25MPa Grout It is noted in Clause 3.1.2 that consideration should be given to the fact that the above values have a range of +/- 20%. The elastic modulus of steel reinforcement E s = 200,000 MPa.