Endangered Species Act,

Similar documents
The Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry and Municipal Planning Lake Links

Herbicide Use and Regulations in Ontario March 22, 2017

SAR Pathfinder - Background. SAR Pathfinder Goals and Activities

Policy # Section Biodiversity Policy and Program Development

Multi species, site-based plans: Parks Canada s approach to Species-at-Risk action planning

Species at Risk Act Permitting Policy

MTO Best Management Practices for Species at Risk Protection during Maintenance Activities

Species at Risk Act Policies and Guideline Series

PROPOSED PIPELINES TO SERVE THE COMMUNITY OF FENELON FALLS: ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT

Class Environmental Assessment for Provincial Parks and Conservation Reserves. MNRF s FORMAL REQUEST for AMENDMENT April 2015

NAAEE 2014 Conference, Ottawa

Managing Species at Risk in British Columbia Guidance for Resource Professionals

Policy Regarding the Identification of Anthropogenic Structures as Critical Habitat under the Species at Risk Act

City of Kingston Tree By-Law Guidelines

Manitoba s Submission Guidelines for Peatland Management Plans

LIVING LANDS Helping Land Trusts Conserve Biodiversity

Fisheries and Oceans Canada Species at Risk Act. Directive on the Identification of Critical Habitat for Aquatic Species at Risk

Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation Process Southeast Regional Office

Managed Forest Tax Incentive Program Encouraging Responsible Forest Stewardship Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry

Developing a Voluntary Carbon Offsets Program for Ontario

LAND DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING FORUM 2014 THE 2014 PROVINCIAL POLICY STATEMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

Karner Blue Lycaeides melissa samuelis

Wildland Fire Management Strategy

Ottawa-Trussler Area Sewage Facility Class Environmental Assessment

Shell Quest Carbon Capture and Storage Project. Shell Canada Limited

Overview of the Habitat Conservation Plan

Huron-Manistee National Forests Mio Ranger District 107 McKinley Road Mio, MI 48647

Environmental Regulation & Mine Permitting in Ontario

Ministry of Natural Resources. Strategy for Wolf Conservation in Ontario

The province has been divided into six Fire Management Zones based on common management objectives, land use, fire load, and forest ecology.

[FWS R8 ES 2017 N107; FXES FF08ECAR00] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Incidental Take Permit

People are using many approaches to slow the rate of extinctions and to preserve biodiversity.

Federal Requirements for Waterpower Development Environmental Assessment Processes in Ontario - PRACTITIONER S GUIDE -

Healthy Waterfront Properties Permits and Fish Habitat

Summary Statement PLANNING REPORT & AGGREGATE RESOURCES ACT. Part of Lot 3, Concessions 1 and 2, Township of Clearview, County of Simcoe OSTER PIT

PHASE 3 SUBWATERSHED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY AND IMPLEMENTATION

DECISION NOTICE AND FINDING OF No SIGNIFICANT IMPACT HOPKINS FIRE SALVAGE

Sections:

- :~MM~Si6~ER:)ETc:...

CONSERVING OUR FUTURE. A Modernized Conservation Authorities Act

Alberta Wetland Policy

Value of native bees to agriculture

City of Ottawa. Environmental Impact Statement Guidelines. 2 nd Edition April 2012

Top 10 Risks of the Clean Fill Dump Site

PLANT AND ANIMAL DIVERSITY

Canada-Ontario Domestic Action Plan for Lake Erie Phosphorus Reduction. Agriculture Sector Working Group April 19, 2017

ontario.ca/speciesatrisk

City of Burlington Renewable Energy Protocol Section 1: Background and Context

available in multiple formats Environmental Self-Assessment Handbook for Rail Infrastructure Projects

FIA SFI Summary Re-Certification Audit Report

SA Inquiry into Biodiversity - How well do the Inquiry recommendations align to APEEL s thinking?

Provincial Policy Statement 2014 Training Aid

State of Florida Department of Community Affairs Areas of Critical State Concern Implementation Status Report Apalachicola Bay Area

Habitat Management Workshop Report

CHAPTER 3 POLICY, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK

Provincial Policy Statement 2014

Ontario Envirothon LEARNING OBJECTIVES. Ontario Envirothon Learning Objectives

Katahdin Forest Management 2016 SFI Summary Audit Report

Appendix 1: Forest Carbon Emission Offset Project Development Guidance

Parks Canada and Species at Risk Initiatives at Bruce Peninsula and Georgian Bay Islands National Parks

COSSARO Candidate Species at Risk Evaluation Form. for. Karner Blue (Lycaeides melissa samuelis)

Revised mapping of the CITES Strategic Vision: objectives and the Aichi Targets in the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity


Chapter 13: Wildlife and Vegetation

State of the Woodland Caribou Resource Report

The project will be conducted in partnership with the Nez Perce Tribe.

Tasmania s Forest Management System

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY GUIDELINES

ENVIRONMENTAL SCREENING REPORT

remnants in southern ontario (pinery provincial park, point Pelee National park and Rondeau Provincial Park)

CITIZENS GUIDE THE PLANNING ACT MINISTRY OF MUNICIPAL AFFAIRS AND HOUSING

Investments improving the resilience and environmental value of forest ecosystems

Performance Standard 6 V2

A Framework for Monitoring & Evaluating Wildlife Resource Values

Information on LULUCF actions by Sweden. First progress report

Preface. MNR # Queen s Printer for Ontario, 2012 ISBN (PRINT) ISBN (PDF)

to get that license the ministry must first complete a detailed federal environmental assessment Defining environmental impacts

Imagine the result DRAFT. SENES Consultants ONTARIO GENERATION. Project Description Report. April 2015

Changing How We Do Business. An Introduction to Results-based Regulations and The Saskatchewan Environmental Code

Natural Resource Management of Pipeline Infrastructure

OBTAINING A SMALLTOOTH SAWFISH SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH OR ENHANCEMENT PERMIT: Navigating the Process

Electricity Safety (Electric Line Clearance) Regulations 2010

Applications for Power Plants, Substations, Transmission Lines, Industrial System Designations and Hydro Developments

Operational Policy Statement

Climate Change and Renewable Energy Bill 2017*

PRESCRIBED FIRE IN SOUTHWEST IDAHO

Information Request 37

WETLANDS AND WILDLIFE PONDS How to address concerns identified in your Environmental Farm Plan Worksheet #22

Multi-Year Area-Based Permitting Policy for Mineral and Coal Exploration Activities

REGIONAL HEALTH AUTHORITIES ACT

Climate Change and Renewable Energy Bill 2017*

407 TRANSITWAY. Planning & Preliminary Design

British Columbia s. VVater Act. Modernization. Policy Proposal on British Columbia s new Water Sustainability Act. December 2010

THE LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK FOR MUNICIPAL PLANNING, SUBDIVISION, AND DEVELOPMENT CONTROL

Karner Blue Butterfly

C&B Alberta Solar Development ULC

MODULE 5: ECOLOGICAL IMPACTS

General Plan Update Workshop 6 Agriculture, Conservation, & Open Space February 23, 2005

CITY OF AIRWAY HEIGHTS SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE C-664

Transcription:

Endangered Species Act, 2007 101 2017 Ontario West Municipal Conference Friday, November 24 th, 2017 Kathryn Markham, Management Biologist Aylmer District, MNRF

Overview The Endangered Species Act, 2007 Species at risk (SAR) Species and habitat protection ESA, the Provincial Policy Statement and municipal planning Authorizations Modernization of Approvals Engaging MNRF Common Five-lined Skink Carolinian population (END)

Endangered Species Act, 2007 (ESA 2007) ESA 2007 came into force on June 30 th, 2008 Protects endangered and threatened species at risk (SAR) and their habitats Purposes of the Act: 1. Identify species at risk based on best available scientific information, including information obtained from community knowledge and Aboriginal traditional knowledge 2. To protect species that are at risk and their habitats, and to promote the recovery of species that are at risk 3. To promote stewardship activities to assist in the protection and recovery of species that are at risk

Species at Risk (SAR) Species at risk = any native plant or animal in danger of extinction or of disappearing from Ontario 4 statuses of SAR: Extirpated Threatened Endangered Special Concern No longer exists in the wild in Ontario (e.g. Karner Blue) Facing extinction or extirpation (e.g. Bluehearts) At risk of becoming endangered (e.g. Dwarf Hackberry) Sensitive to human activities & natural events (e.g. Snapping Turtle)

Application of the ESA 2007 The ESA 2007 is a law of general application, which means: Binding on everyone (i.e. landowners, corporations, municipal and provincial governments) Applies to both private and public lands Applies all the time (i.e. regardless of approvals under other legislation) MNRF has the only approval authority under the ESA 2007 American Badger SW Ontario population (END)

Protection under the ESA 2007 Species Protection (section 9) No person shall, (a) kill, harm, harass, capture or take a living member of a species that is listed on the SARO List as an extirpated, endangered or threatened species; (b) possess, transport, collect, buy, sell, lease, trade or offer to buy, sell, lease or trade, i. A living or dead member of a species that is listed as extirpated, endangered or threatened species, ii. iii. Any part of a living or dead member of a species referred to in subclause (i), Anything derived from a living or dead member of a species referred to in subclause (i). Policy Guidance on Harm and Harass under the Endangered Species Act available online at http://www.ontario.ca/document/policy-guidance-harm-and-harass-under-endangered-species-act

Protection under the ESA 2007 Habitat Protection (section 10) Prohibits damaging or destroying habitat of endangered or threatened species Protected habitat is either based on the general definition (General Habitat Protection) in the Act or prescribed through a regulation (Regulated Habitat Protection) General habitat descriptions exist for some species with general habitat protection Habitat regulation summaries exist for some species with regulated habitat protection **note that all END and THR species receive habitat protection Categorizing and Protecting Habitat under the Endangered Species Act available online at http://www.ontario.ca/document/categorizi ng-and-protecting-habitat-underendangered-species-act

ESA 2007 and Provincial Policy Statement The Provincial Policy Statement, 2014 (PPS) states: Development and site alteration shall not be permitted in habitat of endangered species and threatened species, except in accordance with provincial and federal requirements. Provincial requirements = ESA 2007 requirements E and T species habitat (PPS) = protected habitat under the ESA 2007 (either regulated or general) ESA 2007 can authorize activities that will damage or destroy END or THR species habitat

ESA 2007 and Municipal Planning ESA 2007 is a law of general application that is binding on everyone (i.e. landowners, corporations, municipal and provincial governments) Applies to both private and public lands, regardless of approvals under other legislation Proponent-led MNRF provides technical advice and approves habitat for END and THR species for the purposes of the PPS MNRF also works closely with the planning authority and MMA to help achieve coordination of the ESA 2007

Ministry of Natural Resources & and Forestry Forestry Roles & Responsibilities Proponent ESA 2007 is a proponent-led process Must submit sufficient information to the approval authority Responsibility to ensure due diligence under the ESA 2007 Approval Authority Makes decision consistent with section 2.1.7 of PPS 2014 Can request additional information from proponent Can request technical advice from Province MNRF (Province) Provides advice on: - Species/ habitat presence - Avoidance - Potential impacts to species/habitat - Potential contravention Can authorize a contravention (through permit or registry)

& Forestry Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry What to look for The proponent has provided sufficient rationale that: no E & T habitat occur on or adjacent to the property; or, avoidance measures will result in no contravention of the ESA 2007; or, avoidance cannot be achieved and the proponent is able to outline the impacts of the proposed development and site alteration on E + T habitat, and how the project will comply with the ESA 2007 (and/or SARA, if applicable).

& Forestry Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Endangered Species Act - Spectrum Low likelihood of impacts to: Habitat Species MNRF advice (in Letter to Proponent) to avoid impacts to: Habitat Species Known impacts (including mitigation) Register Permit MNRF is responsible for implementing the ESA 2007

Potential Responses from MNRF Information Requests: Provide a list of species/confirm list of species Indicate high or low potential for SAR and/or habitats Intended to inform fieldwork and impact assessments in Environmental Impact Studies Project Screenings: Review documents provided and determine if contravention is LIKELY to occur or NOT LIKELY to occur * The County is looking to confirm that section 2.1.7 of the PPS 2014 has been addressed.

Authorizations Authorizations provide flexibility to allow activities to occur that might otherwise be prohibited Agreements (e.g. stewardship) 9(5) Transfers (i.e. scientific, educational, or ceremonial purposes) Permits under Section 17 of the ESA 2007: 17(2)(a) = Human health and safety 17(2)(b) = Protection or recovery of the species 17(2)(c) = Purpose isn t protection or recovery (i.e. overall benefit) 17(2)(d) = Social or economic benefit to Ontario Spiny Softshell (END)

State of species at risk Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry 17(2)c ESA Permit - Overall Benefit Projected state with overall benefit actions Overall benefit Current state Projected state with steps to minimize adverse effects Minimization of adverse effects Completion of all permit conditions Projected state without steps to minimize adverse effects 15

Modernization of Approvals Project (MAP) Regulatory provisions under the ESA 2007 came into force on July 1 st, 2013 Proponent responsible for determining eligibility before registering activity online Specific conditions must be met for each exemption, including Measures to minimize adverse effects of the activity on SAR Creating and following a mitigation plan Monitoring and reporting on the effectiveness of mitigation measures Specific rules and species exclusions unique to each regulation See Ontario Regulation 242/08 Fowler s Toad (END) Eastern Foxsnake Carolinian population (END)

ESA 2007 Regulatory Provisions Elimination (0) Rules in Regulation (2) Registration (17) Wood Poppy (END) Administrative Efficiencies 1. Commercial Cultivation of Vascular Plants Transition for Activities Already Approved or Planned 2. Crown Forest Operations Transition for Activities Already Approved or Planned 1. Newly Listed and Transition Species - Development Operations 2. Waterpower Facilities 3. Aggregate Pits/Quarries 4. Drainage Infrastructure 5. Wind Facilities 6. Early Mineral Exploration Streamlined Approaches for New Activities to Benefit Species 7. Activities to Protect or Recover Species at Risk 8. Protection, Maintenance, Enhancement or Restoration of Ecosystems Standard Approaches to Benefit SAR 9. Butternut 10. Specific Aquatic Species 11. Bobolink and Eastern Meadowlark 12. Chimney Swift; 13. Barn Swallow 14. Safe Harbour Administrative Efficiencies Other 15. Incidental Trapping 17. Human Health and Safety 16. Possession of SAR

ESA 2007 Registry Examples 1) Barn Swallow can remove or alter structure if construct structure with nest cups within 1 km of site 2) Butternut can kill up to 10 retainable trees if plant replacement seedlings within 3 years in suitable habitat 3) Drainage can maintain or improve existing drains if follow prepared mitigation plan Must work with district for new drainage projects 4) Transition Regulation development projects exempt for species that received general habitat protection on June 30 th, 2013, or species that are newly listed Only exempts section 10, so must work with district for section 9 impacts (i.e. SAR plants) Dense Blazing Star (THR)

Prior to Engaging MNRF Engaging MNRF Proponents are expected to consult: Make a Map / NHIC / Biodiversity Explorer / LIO Datasets / DFO Data Species at Risk in Ontario (SARO) List When to Engage MNRF When it is anticipated that a project may impact SAR species and/or their habitat OR if there is uncertainty if the project will impact SAR species and/or their habitat How to Engage MNRF Planning Act Applications/ Environmental Assessment/ Aggregates MMAH / MNRF District Planner All other Municipal Activities (i.e. Building, Construction, Roads, Drainage, etc.) ESA specific emails (e.g. ESA.Aylmer@ontario.ca) **Recommend engaging MNRF as early as possible Butternut (END)

Learn More MNRF s species at risk website https://www.ontario.ca/page/species-risk Endangered Species Act, 2007 http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws_statutes_07e06_e.htm Ontario Regulation 242/08 http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/regs/english/elaws_regs_080242_e.htm Species at Risk in Ontario List http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/regs/english/elaws_regs_080230_e.htm Least Bittern (THR)

Questions? Thank you! Blanding s Turtle (THR)