SOLUTIONS FOR THE BUILT WORLD. Assess & Prioritize. Keys to Asset Management. Carl J. Larosche, PE.

Similar documents
RAPID STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORTS 101. Protecting Your Bridge Inventory for the Future Jason Kelly, PE

Bridge Preventative Maintenance.Act now before this happens to you! Keith Cooper, P.E. Local Bridge Program Manager

BRIDGE PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE STRATEGY FOR ERIE-NIAGARA LOCAL BRIDGE OWNERS

Seismic Analysis and Design of Berth 14 Extension Balboa, Panama. Way, WA ; PH (206) ;

Introduction Introduction

Conversion table working groups Name working group Old number New number Conception des barrages mobiles et de barriers anti-tempêtes PIANC WG 101

The Northern Waterfront Seawall History and Earthquake Performance Waterfront Plan Working Group Meeting April 13, 2016

MMM Group Limited. Eagle Island Pier Inspection Report. Prepared for: District of West Vancouver. July

ODOT Asset Management Plan 0

Load Rating of Timber Bridges in Western Australia

The Effect of Ultra Large Container Vessels on Cranes and Infrastructure

Cai Mep International Terminal (CMIT)

MARINE SPECIALTY CONTRACTORS GENERAL TRADE KNOWLEDGE EXAMINATION CONTENT INFORMATION FOR COMPUTER BASED TESTING Revised March 2012

BERTHS 57, 58 AND 59 CONTAINER WHARF AT THE PORT OF OAKLAND

US 278 East Bound and West Bound. MacKay Creek and Skull Creek. Cursory Above Water and Underwater Investigation Of. Over

Anchor Consultants, LLC. Client Satisfaction through Technical Excellence and Responsive Services

Hand Calculation Examples. CG Gilbertson

MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION ONTARIO MANAGING OUR ASSETS

AAPA Facilities and Engineering Seminar. Robert Tolsma PE, PPM, D.PE Division Manager Atkins North America San Diego, CA Oct 22, 2015

Continuous for Live Load: A Texas Historical Perspective

MANUAL OF THE STRUCTURE AND BRIDGE DIVISION

Bridge Replacement Study (Phase 1)

A COMPREHENSIVE BRIDGE PRESERVATION PROGRAM TO EXTEND SERVICE LIFE. Bruce Johnson 1

Alcoa Mosjøen Harbor Remediation Project Information and Fender Design

National Bridge Inspection Program Risk-based, Data-driven FHWA Oversight

Implementing Asset Management: WSDOT s Experience

The Evolution of Structures Asset Management in Wisconsin

Bridge Inspection Manual. Revised July 2002 by Texas Department of Transportation (512) all rights reserved

AGING AND FAILING INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS: HIGHWAY BRIDGES

THE PORT OF NEW ORLEANS BRIDGE SAFETY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FRA COMPLIANCE 49 CFR PARTS 213 & 237

Accelerated Bridge Construction Award

Partnerships in Capital Projects. AAPA Facilities Engineering Seminar and Expo

GUIDE FOR APPLICANTS

Designing Bridges for Inspectability

STRUCTURES SPECIFICATIONS FOR BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION ISSUES. John Westphal, P.E. State Construction Office January 2017

Alberta Bridge Inventory STANDARD BRIDGE & CULVERT COMPONENTS. Standard Bridges. Typical Bridge Components. In Alberta there are about 13,300 bridges.

Ageing and Life extension for structures. David Galbraith Ocean Structures / Sigma Offshore

Introduction. Key Words: Life-Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA), Bridge Pile Repair, RealCost, BridgeLCC, BLCCA

Design and Rating of Steel Bridges

2008 Bridge Load Rating Class 101

Well Road Project Accelerated Bridge Construction Using Self-Propelled Modular Transporters (SPMT s) By: Mark Bucci, P.E.

Country Bridge Solutions

Chapter 4 Bridge Program Drawings

Introduction. Background

Overview. Fracture Critical Inspection History Project Overview Research to Determine Criteria Case Studies Conclusions

Paul D. Izzo, P.E. Structural Engineer

DEVELOPMENT OF A PILE CONDITION INDEX AND A ROAD MAP FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A STRUCTURAL SECTION RATING

COSIDERATION OF MULTIPLE HAZARDS IN HIGHWAY BRIDGE DESIGN - A Current FHWA Sponsored Project

AASHTO Manual for Bridge Evaluation: Section 3, Bridge Management Systems A Practical Tour

Jacksonville Port Authority Blount Island Marine Terminal Rail Improvements Jacksonville, Florida

Summary of Findings. Bridge Inspection and Monitoring. Introduction. Findings

AC : SEISMIC DESIGN OF PIERS AND WHARFS: A CAPSTONE COURSE APPLICATION OF A NEW STANDARD FOR DESIGNING PORT STRUCTURES IN THE UNITED STATES

Port Authority of Guam

SHIP DONATION INSPECTION PROGRAM CHECKLIST. Fair or Better Material Condition corrosion in the worst areas does not have pitting exceeding 25 percent

National Bridge Inspection Program Risk-based, Data-driven FHWA Oversight

Alice Alipour CV - Page 1 of 5

HEGER DRY DOCK, INC Structural/Marine Engineers 531 Concord Street Holliston, MA Tel Fax

Evaluation of Rehabilitation Alternatives for the Cedar Avenue Bridge

Port of Los Angeles Presentation to the Los Angeles Investors Conference March 19, 2018

BUILDING INTEGRITY SUMMARY REPORT

PLANNING, DESIGN, and REALIZATION OF AUTOMATED TERMINALS Ashebir Jacob P.E. Senior Port Engineer / Vice President

Alder Drive / Blair Road Bridge Replacement Projects

Guideline for Bridge Safety Management February 2012

Strategic Asset Management for Ports and Waterways: An Imperative Whose Time Has Come

BMI Precast PRECAST & PRESTRESSED CONCRETE PRODUCTS

Bids JANUARY 25, 2017 AT 2:00 P.M. (EASTERN TIME) (Estimated Cost: $3,600,000)

National Bridge Inspection Program (NBIP) Off System Bridge Compliance Update

PART 3 TERMINAL INFORMATION

Implementation of a Bridge Management System In The Province of Nova Scotia

ATHABASCA RIVER BRIDGE REHABILITATION PROJECT

Bridge PBEE Overview & Pilot Next Generation Bridge Studies

9D - BRIDGE INSPECTION

APPENDIX I RECORD OF NON APPLICABILITY

Life Extension Services. Life Cycle Services

Anchorage Port Modernization Concept for Seismic Resiliency

PREPARED FOR: NEW BEDFORD HARBOR DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION FLOATING DOCK CONDITION ASSESSMENT REPORT PORT OF NEW BEDFORD POPE S ISLAND MARINA

P. O. Box 1756 Norfolk, Virginia (757) Fax: (757)

Bridge Development Update

Procedure No: (SP) Effective: August 28, 2002 Responsible Office: Division of Finance and Forecasting INFRASTRUCTURE CAPITALIZATION PROCEDURE

TERMINAL INFORMATION AVONMOUTH, BRISTOL

PRELIMINARY DESIGN REPORT STATE PIER COMPLEX IMPROVEMENTS NEW LONDON, CONNECTICUT. State Project No /247 MMI #

PUBLIC NOTICE LOS ANGELES DISTRICT. APPLICATION FOR PERMIT Port of Los Angeles Berths : Wilmington Waterfront Promenade

These guidelines are to ensure systematic and consistent pier construction throughout the Jonathan s Landing development.

THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF INVESTMENTS AT SOUTH TERMINAL AT THE PORT OF EVERETT

Click to edit Master title style

Scenario-based simulation of revenue loss at seismically damaged seaports

Miami River Freight Improvement Plan Financial Management Number:

Consulting Engineers. civil structural geo-environmental traffic flood risk renewable energy rail party wall & cdmc

2. THE CONTEXT OF PORT PRICING

Field application of FRP material in Kentucky

NATIONAL BRIDGE INSPECTION STANDARDS (NBIS)

MASTER AGREEMENT FOR BRIDGE DESIGN SERVICES SCOPE OF WORK

AASHTO TSP-2 Update SCOBS. June 11-15, 2017 Dave Juntunen, MDOT

WATER SURFACE MANAGEMENT

TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD PAGE

Memorandum. California public trust law governs the administration of tidelands and submerged lands in several ways:

15.8 Multipurpose Terminal Project Preparing Alternative Terminal Plans

Transcription:

SOLUTIONS FOR THE BUILT WORLD Assess & Prioritize Keys to Asset Management Carl J. Larosche, PE www.wje.com

Presentation Outline The Case for Asset Management Executive Decision-making Element-based Inspection Process & Procedure Asset Rating

Port Facilities - Asset Management

Establish Priorities Structural Deterioration Cost Operational Impact Environmental Impact Safety Hazards Return on Investment

Basis for Prioritization Condition Assessment Repair Recommendations Wharf/Structural Asset Characteristics Overall Priority Cost & Revenue

Cost & Revenue Cost of Repair Program Maintain current loads? Upgrade to greater loads? Revenue Current Projected (no repairs) Projected (with repairs)

Condition Assessment Element-by-Element Current Condition Future Condition Years of Service Remaining

Wharf Characteristics Dock Configuration Area Usage Load Rating Location on Site Channel

Asset Management Plan Objectives and Measure Performance Gap Identification Lifecycle Cost & Risk Management Analysis Financial Planning Capital Budget

Facility Inspection Program Database of Asset inspection and inventory Element-level Inspection Feeds into Component Level Data Rates Asset Performance Monitors Deterioration Maximizes Owner Benefits Minimizes Owner costs

Hierarchy of Facility Terms - Elemental Based Property or Terminal Maritime Asset Component Element Consists of several maritime assets e.g., Container Terminal, Bulk Caro Terminal, Transportation Area Wharf Boat Dock Bulkhead Shoreline Consists of one or more components Structural or nonstructural system of elements Structural (e.g., superstructure, bulkhead) Berthing system Shoreline Ancillary (e.g., crane rails, access systems) Individual elements that make up a component Structural or nonstructural e.g., RC slab, RC deck beam, steel pile, timber pile, cleat, bollard, wearing surface

Inspection Types Primary aspects Type Sub-type Primary Objective Baseline Routine Special Above water Underwater Above water Underwater Post-event In-Depth Due Diligence Inspection to establish the baseline (initial) asset inventory information, element condition states, component ratings and asset condition for a new asset or for an existing asset where no previous record exists. Regularly-scheduled inspection to define asset condition, component ratings, and element condition states at a point in time and to allow tracking of conditions over time. Rapid inspection to assess overall condition following an extreme event such as a hurricane, flood, or vessel impact. In-Depth inspection to determine cause and/or significance of damage or distress, to aid in determining a suitable repair approach, or to define quantities necessary for repair purposes. Inspection to establish the general condition, asset value, or need for and approximate cost of repairs, at times of change of ownership, lease, or for insurance purposes.

At specified frequency Relationship Between Inspection Types Outcomes Baseline Inspection No Action More information or repairs needed Immediate Action* *Immediate Actions: Respond to conditions that may compromise facility operations or lead to loss of life, property damage or environmental damage Outcomes No Action Routine Inspection More information or repairs needed Immediate Action* Outcomes In-depth Inspection No Action More info needed Repair/ Strengthen Immediate Action* Construction

Discussion Inspection Frequency Source Max. Above Water Max. Underwater WJE 3 yrs 6 yrs Bridges (FHWA BIRM) Waterfront Structures 2 yrs 5 yrs 0.5 to 6 yrs (ASCE 130) 0.5 to 6 yrs (ASCE 101) Comments Interval may be reduced or increased depending on condition or use Specific guidance is not provided in Manual Engineer recommends, PHA decides Interval may be reduced or increased depending on condition or use FHWA must approve increases Interval depends on previous condition rating, material and environment (see ASCE 130 Table 2-2)

Overall Asset Condition Assessment Overall Asset Rating (AR) for Baseline, Routine, and Due Diligence Inspections Reflects overall adequacy and safety of the asset Based on ratings for structural and non-structural components AR = SR + FR AR = 4 FR for all assets except shorelines for shoreline assets 0 AR 100 Entirely deficient Entirely adequate and safe

Sample Calculations for 4 Hypothetical Assets Components Component Ratings Deductions by Component Group Type Dock1 Dock 5 Wharf 20 Dock 10 Dock1 Dock 5 Wharf 20 Dock 10 Structural Components Non-Structural Components Superstructure 3 6 5 4 SP 13 0 3 6 Substructure 4 5 5 4 SB 8 4 4 8 Deck 4 5 3 4 DK 3 1 5 3 Bulkhead 5 5 4 2 BH 4 4 8 30 Bearings NA NA NA NA BR 0 0 0 0 Joints 4 6 4 4 JN 2 0 2 2 Fender System 2 6 4 2 FS 13 0 3 13 Mooring System 5 6 5 5 MS 2 0 2 2 Shoreline Comp. NA NA NA NA SH 0 0 0 0 Ancillary Comp. 3 5 5 4 AC 3 1 1 1 Asset Rating 52 90 72 35 SR = 47 66 55 28 Note: NA = component type not applicable to asset. FR = 5 24 17 7

Example Dock 1

Summary: Assess and Prioritize 1. Establish Priorities for Asset Management 2. Condition Assessment Concrete Inspection & Evaluation Predicting Service Life 3. Prioritize Based on Assessment Results 4. Use AR to develop long-time capital expenditures

Questions? Carl J. Chuck Larosche, PE Email: Phone: Address: clarosche@wje.com 512-257-4811 (office) 9511 N. Lake Creek Parkway Austin, Texas 78717