Proposed Modifications to the LRFD Design of U-Beam Bearings

Similar documents
BRIDGE DESIGN MANUAL UPDATES. Jamie F. Farris, P.E.

NOVEMBER 2017 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 14-1

BrD Superstructure Tutorial

The use of 0.5 and 0.6 in. (13 and 15 mm) diameter

Title Page: Modeling & Load Rating of Two Bridges Designed with AASHTO and Florida I-Beam Girders

Substructure systems, specifically retaining walls

Design Aids of NU I-Girders Bridges

JULY 2014 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 5-1

Design of Short Span Steel Bridges

Continuous for Live Load: A Texas Historical Perspective

A PRODUCT FROM KANTAFLEX (INDIA) PVT LIMITED

CONCRETE SPLICED GIRDERS IN TEXAS. Nicholas Nemec, P.E. TxDOT-BRG

Bijan Khaleghi, Ph, D. P.E., S.E.

HIGH PERFORMANCE CONCRETE. by John J. Roller CTLGroup

Design and Construction of the SH58 Ramp A Flyover Bridge over IH70. Gregg A. Reese, PE, CE, Summit Engineering Group, Inc.

AASHTOWare BrD 6.8. BrR and BrD Tutorial. PS7-3 Stem PS Bridge Example

DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE OPTIMIZED CONTINUITY DIAPHRAGM FOR PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BULB-T BEAMS

AASHTOWare BrR 6.8 Steel Tutorial Steel Plate Girder Using LRFR Engine

AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8 Steel Tutorial STL6 Two Span Plate Girder Example

BRIDGE GIRDERS TECHNICAL GUIDE

AUGUST 2016 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 3-1

ADAPT-PTRC 2016 Getting Started Tutorial ADAPT-PT mode

Slab Bridge Designer 2.1 Help: Example Analysis

DETAILS OF LAMINATED NEOPRENE BEARING PAD ASSEMBLY

Introduction to Decks and Deck Systems

Route 360 Inverted T-beams. Carin Roberts-Wollmann Virginia Tech Tommy Cousins Clemson University Fatmir Menkulasi Louisiana Tech

EXPERIMENTAL AND ANALYTICAL INVESTIGATION OF FULL-DEPTH PRECAST DECK PANELS ON PRESTRESSED I-GIRDERS

Session 2: Basic Load Rating Calculations

A Guide for the Interpretation of Structural Design Options for Residential Concrete Structures

ACCELERATED BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION IN TEXAS. Michael D. Hyzak, PE 1 Gregg A. Freeby, PE 2 Lloyd M. Wolf, PE 3 David P. Hohmann, PE 4 John M.

October BC MoTI

DIVISION: METALS SECTION: STEEL DECKING REPORT HOLDER: EPIC METALS CORPORATION 11 TALBOT AVENUE RANKIN, PENNSYLVANIA 15104

MIDAS Training Series

PORTAL FRAMES 1.0 INTRODUCTION

STRENGTHENING STEEL-CONCRETE COMPOSITE BRIDGES WITH HIGH MODULUS CARBON FIBER REINFORCED POLYMER (CFRP) LAMINATES

AASHTOWare BrR/BrD 6.8 Reinforced Concrete Structure Tutorial RC5 Schedule Based Tee Example

PRESTRESSED AND POST-TENSIONED CONCRETE TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 12

Structural Technical Report #2 Pro/Con Study of Alternate Floor Systems

Release Notes MERLIN DASH V10.8 (WIN 6.2)

ANCHORAGE ZONE DESIGN FOR PRETENSIONED PRECAST BULB-T BRIDGE GIRDERS IN VIRGINIA

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT SERIES

USE OF 500 GRADE STEEL IN THE DESIGN OF REINFORCED CONCRETE SLAB. Prof. M. Shafiul Bari, Ph.D Department of Civil Engg., BUET

JULY 2016 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 11-1

Reinforced Concrete Column Design

Bjorhovde, R. Stub Girder Floor Systems Structural Engineering Handbook Ed. Chen Wai-Fah Boca Raton: CRC Press LLC, 1999

W. Mark McGinley March 3, 2016 ISEA MEETINGS 1

Field and Laboratory Study of the Mn/DOT Precast Slab Span System

North Mountain IMS Medical Office Building

Strength Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures

Principal Bridge Engineer Middle East & India Atkins Abu Dhabi, UAE

Hyperstatic (Secondary) Actions In Prestressing and Their Computation

Precast Concrete Bearing Wall Panel Design (Alternative Analysis Method) (Using ACI )

Implementation of a Precast Inverted T-Beam System in Virginia: Part I: Laboratory Investigations

Hand Calculation Examples. CG Gilbertson

PENNDOT e-notification

Product Designation As specified in the AISI standard for cold formed steel framing General provisions A5.2.

Unclassified. Unclassified Form DOT F (8-72) Technical Report Documentation Page 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No.

UHPC Connection of Precast Bridge Deck

Shear and Flexural Capacity of High Strength Prestressed Concrete Bridge Girders

Full-Depth Precast Concrete Bridge Deck Construction

TXDOT ENGINEERING SOFTWARE SUPPORT INFORMATION. Prestressed Concrete Girder SUPERstructure Design and Analysis Program (PGSuper TM )

The Pennsylvania State University. The Graduate School. College of Engineering EVALUATION OF BRACING SYSTEMS IN HORIZONTALLY CURVED STEEL I-

Structural Technical Report 1 Structural Concepts / Structural Existing Conditions Report

Comparison of haunched and constant depth steel box bridge girders, International Bridge Conference, Pittsburgh, PA., June 1984 (F.L. Publ.

Creep and Shrinkage Analysis of Composite Truss Bridge with Double Decks

Reinforced Concrete Design. A Fundamental Approach - Fifth Edition

Seismic Performance of Precast Concrete Bents used for Accelerated Bridge Construction. Bijan Khaleghi 1

Supplemental Structural Correction Sheet Steel Brace Frame Design (2017 LABC)

Guide to Bridge Standard Drawings. August 2017 Bridge Division

Lateral Design of Mid- Rise Wood Structures

FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS AND PARAMETRIC STUDY OF CURVED CONCRETE BOX GIRDER USING ABAQUS SOFTWARE

CVEN 483. Structural System Overview

Live Load Test and Finite Element Analysis of a Box Girder Bridge for the Long Term Bridge Performance Program

Forensic Testing of Post Tensioned Concrete Girders

CSiBridge Version Release Notes

Deflection Assessment of an FRP-Reinforced Concrete Bridge. By Danielle K. Stone, Andrea Prota, and Antonio Nanni

xiii Preface to the Fifth Edition Preface to the Second Edition Factors for Conversion to SI Units of

North Mountain IMS Medical Office Building

16. Design of Pipeline Structures.

D D TYPE A1, A2 & B MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 5-40 CONNECTION. L4" x 4" x 3/8" Brace. C8 x 4.25 Strut. WT9 x 17.5.

DIRECT DESIGN METHOD DDM

Predicted vs Measured Initial Camber in Precast Prestressed Concrete Girders

Design of A Special Bridge for Taiwan High Speed Rail Project Lot C296

One-Way Wide Module Joist Concrete Floor Design

TORSION SIMPLIFIED: A FAILURE PLANE MODEL FOR DESIGN OF SPANDREL BEAMS

SECTION VIBRATION CONTROLS FOR HVAC PIPING AND EQUIPMENT

Curved, Precast, Pretensioned Concrete I-Girder Bridges

Bridge articulation No. 1.04

Bridge Superstructure Design. SNiP

Part B: Design Calculations

AASHTO LRFD. Reinforced Concrete. Eric Steinberg, Ph.D., P.E. Department of Civil Engineering Ohio University

Design and Rating of Steel Bridges

USE OF A SANDWICH PLATE SYSTEM IN A VIRGINIA BRIDGE

GIRDER DESIGN FOR BUILDINGS

Copyright. magazine. CFS Load Bearing Construction

SJI Updates Expanded Load Tables for Noncomposite Joists / Joist Girders and Development of New Composite Joist Series

Performance of Post-Tensioned Curved-Strand Connections in Transverse Joints of Precast Bridge Decks

Transcription:

Proposed Modifications to the LRFD Design of U-Beam Bearings Charles D. Newhouse, Scott A. Bole, W. R. Burkett, Phillip T. Nash, Mostafa El-Shami Performed in Cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration Research Project 0-5834 Research Report 0-5834-P1 http://www.techmrt.ttu.edu/reports.php

Notice The United States Government and the State of Texas do not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the object of this report.

Chapter 3 Superstructure Design Section 6 - Prestressed Concrete U Beams (Types U40 and U54) Section 6 Prestressed Concrete U Beams (Types U40 and U54) Materials Use Class H concrete with a minimum f ci = 4.0 ksi and f c = 5.0 ksi. Design beams for 0.5-in, low-relaxation strands. You may use 0.6-in, low-relaxation strands for unusual cases but should check its availability with fabricators. Use prestressing strand with a specified tensile strength, f pu, of 270 ksi. You need not increase section properties of the beam to account for the transformed area of strands or mild steel. Geometric Constraints The maximum skew angle for U-beam bridges is 45 degrees. The maximum allowable transverse slope for U-beam bridges using standard uniform-height steel-reinforced elastomeric bearings is 4 percent. Structural Analysis Beam designs must meet the following requirements: Include the overlay at the discretion of the designer or if the bridge will receive the overlay immediately after construction. Recognize that including the overlay in the design of U beams can significantly limit their ability to span longer span lengths. Distribute 2/3 of the rail dead load to the exterior beam and 1/3 of the rail dead load to the adjacent interior beam applied to the composite cross section. Each U beam has two interior diaphragms at a maximum average thickness of 13 in. They are located as close as 10 ft. from midspan of the beam. Account for each diaphragm as a 2-kip load for U40 beams and as a 3-kip load for U54 beams applied to the non-composite cross section. Use section properties given on the standard drawings. Composite section properties may be calculated assuming the beam and slab to have the same modulus of elasticity (for beams with f c < 8.5 ksi). Do not include haunch concrete placed on top of the beam when determining section properties. Section properties based on final beam and slab modulus of elasticity may also be used. LRFD Bridge Design 3-11 TxDOT 08/2009

Chapter 3 Superstructure Design Section 6 - Prestressed Concrete U Beams (Types U40 and U54) Chapter 3 Superstructure Design Section 6 - Prestressed Concrete U Beams (Types U40 and U54) Live load distribution factors must conform to AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, Article 4.6.2.2.2 for flexural moment and Article 4.6.2.2.3 for shear, except for exterior beam design. For exterior beam design, use a distribution factor for two or more design lanes loaded only. Do not use the distribution factor for one design lane loaded unless the clear roadway width is less than 20.0 ft. Use 1. 0 for the multiple presence factor for one lane loaded. For exterior beams, multiply the result of the lever rule by 0.9 to account for continuity. The live load used to design the exterior beam must never be less than the live load used to design an interior beam. Design Criteria For bridges with less than three girders in the cross section, assume the live load distribution factors for flexural moment and shear are equal to the number of lanes divided by the number of girders. Determine the number of lanes as required by AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, Article 3.6.1.1.1. Standard beam designs must meet the following requirements: Stresses at the ends of the beam are controlled with the use of debonding. Draped strands are not permitted in U beams. The maximum amount of debonding is limited to 75% of the strands per row and per section. The maximum debonded length is the lesser of the following: Half-span length minus the maximum development length specified in the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, Article 5.11.3. 0.2 times the span length 15.0 ft. Grouping of U-beam designs are at the discretion of the designer. However, no exterior U beam may have less carrying capacity than that of an interior U beam of equal length. If the designer chooses to group beams, a general rule is to group beams with no more than a fourstrand difference. See Prestressed Concrete I Beams and Steel-Reinforced Elastomeric Bearings for Prestressed Concrete Beams for other design criteria. Detailing Detail span sheets for a cast-in-place slab with precast concrete panels. LRFD Bridge Design 3-11 TxDOT 08/2009 LRFD Bridge Design 3-12 TxDOT 08/2009

Chapter 5 Other Designs Section 2 Steel Reinforced Elastomeric Bearings for Prestressed Concrete Beams Chapter 5 Other Designs Section 2 Steel Reinforced Elastomeric Bearings for Prestressed Concrete Beams Materials Section 2 Steel-Reinforced Elastomeric Bearings for Prestressed Concrete Beams Use 50-durometer neoprene for steel-reinforced elastomeric bearings. Use a shear modulus range of 95 to 175 psi for design, using the least favorable value for the design check. Make steel shims 0.105 in. thick. Do not use adhesives between bearings and other components. Geometric Constraints See standard drawings available at http ://www.dot. state.tx.us/insdtdot/orgchartlcmd/cserve/standard/bridge-e.htm for standard pad details. You may use tapered bearings if the taper does not exceed 0.055 ft./ft. For beams on steeper grades, use a beveled steel sole plate field-welded (1/4-in, fillet) to a 1/2-in, steel plate embedded in and anchored to beams with headed stud anchors. Use a minimum of four 1/2-in.-by-3-in. stud anchors with studs located between strands and reinforcement. The minimum thickness of sole plate should be 1.5 in. of steel between weld and elastomer. The sole plate should extend at least 1 in. beyond the beam flange. Sole plates should not be vulcanized to the bearing to allow slip to occur at the beam/bearing interface. Use 1/4-in, exterior pad layers. If using 1/4-in, interior pad layers, disregard the requirements in the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, Article 14.7.6.1, specifying exterior layers no thicker than 70% of internal layers. Structural Analysis Assume a temperature change of 70 degrees Fahrenheit after erection when calculating thermal movement in one direction (not total). This provides a conservative estimate of thermal movement after erection in most regions of Texas based on the minimum and maximum temperature contour maps in the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, Article 3.12.2.2.1 (the panhandle region is the most extreme case with Tmin at 10 degrees F and Tmax at 115 degrees F). Do not include shrinkage, creep, and elastic shortening when determining maximum movement, which will be accommodated through infrequent slip. Do not apply IM to live load when checking compressive stress (see AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, Commentary C 14.7.5.3.2). Use appropriate shear live load distribution, modified for skew. Use the critical DL condition (the lightest predicted DL) when checking against slip as required by AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, Article 14.7.6.4. Use Load Combination Service I for all gravity loads. For the design of steel-reinforced elastomeric bearings for U-beam bridges placed on a transverse slope, the effect of the transverse slope shall be considered by including: Design Criteria The transverse displacement, Delta1, caused by the horizontal component of the end reaction; The distance from the centerline of the bearing and the center of gravity of the composite U- beam and deck section, Delta2, determined as the product of the transverse slope and the perpendicular distance from the bottom of the composite U-beam and deck section to its center of gravity; The transverse moment, M t, determined by the product of the end reaction and the sum of the Delta1 and Delta2 distances for the Compressive Stress, Compressive Deflection, and the Rotation checks; The effective displacement, Δ s,eff, determined as the square root of the sum of the Delta1 and the thermal expansion displacements for the Shear Strain check; The effective slope, Θ Eff, determined as the square root of the sum of the transverse and longitudinal slopes for the Anchorage Slip check. Follow Design Method A in AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, Article 14.7.6, with the following exceptions: DL compressive stress limit is the lesser of 1.20 ksi and 1.2 GS. Total compressive stress limit is the lesser of 1.50 ksi and 1.5 GS. This limit can be exceeded up to 15% at the engineer s discretion. For rotation check, disregard AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, Article 14.7.6.3.5. Rotation is acceptable if the total compressive deflection equals or exceeds, where L is the pad length defined in AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, and Θ is the total rotation. Estimate compressive deflection using AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, Figure C14.7.5.3.3-l. LRFD Bridge Design 5-3 TxDOT 08/2009 LRFD Bridge Design 5-4 TxDOT 08/2009

Chapter 5 Other Designs Section 2 Steel Reinforced Elastomeric Bearings for Prestressed Concrete Beams Calculate total rotation for dead and live load plus 0.005 radians for construction uncertainties as required by AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, Article 14.4.2.1. Take maximum live load rotation as 4* Δ /(span length), where Δ is midspan LL deflection. Account for pad taper when checking against slip as required by AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, Article 14.7.6.4, as follows: Δs (0.2 Gr) x DLxh rt /(GxA), where Gr = beam grade in ft./ft. You may use hrt instead of total pad height when checking stability as required in AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, Article 14.7.6.3.6. Detailing Use standard drawing IBEB for guidance on detailing custom bearing pad designs. LRFD Bridge Design 5-4 TxDOT 08/2009

Texas Tech University Lubbock, Texas 79409 P 806.742.3503 F 806.742.4168