Field Verification of Performance of an Engineered Phosphorus Removal Media Deployed in a Flow Based Stormwater Filter

Similar documents
VERIFICATION STATEMENT

Need to Verify Model TSS Reduction Estimates

CHALLENGING URBAN BMP ASSUMMPTIONS. John Moll, CEO

Stormwater Runoff Water Quality Characteristics From Highways in Lake Tahoe, California

Lake Stevens North Field Evaluation: Stormwater Management StormFilter with ZPG Media

Performance Assessment of an Iron-Enhanced Sand Filtration Trench for Capturing Dissolved Phosphorus

INTRODUCTION BMP DATABASE PROJECTS IN PA

Stormwater Management Fact Sheet: Porous Pavement

FocalPoint as an Acceptable Alternative Biofiltration Practice

STANDARD SPECIFICATION STORMWATER QUALITY MEMBRANE FILTRATION TREATMENT DEVICE

Subject: BaySaver Technologies Submittal for Bayseparator and Bayfilter Technologies

16.0 Water Quality Management Criteria for Developed Land

Vortex Separator. May be more cost-effective pre-treatment devices than traditional wet or dry basins.

Stormwater Local Design Manual For Houston County, Georgia

Structural BMPs for Stormwater Treatment Control a Performance Based Design Method for Urban Drainage System

MODEL Stormwater Local Design Manual. City of Centerville

6.0 Runoff. 6.1 Introduction. 6.2 Flood Control Design Runoff

ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS

A Summary of the International Stormwater BMP Database

BMP 6.4.4: Infiltration Trench

Wet Detention Ponds, MCTTs, and other Options for Critical Area Stormwater Control. Robert Pitt University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL

9.93 lbs lbs 3/31/2012. McGee Watershed 12 cups of sediment. City Hall Watershed 6.1 cups of sediment. 6,700 SF Watershed. 7,700 SF Watershed

NJCAT TECHNOLOGY VERIFICATION

STORMWATER RUNOFF AND WATER QUALITY IMPACT REVIEW

Water Quality Design Storms for Stormwater Hydrodynamic Separators

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS: URBAN STREAM RESTORATION BMP. David Wood Chesapeake Stormwater Network. Lisa Fraley-McNeal Center for Watershed Protection

KriStar Perk Filter Stormwater Treatment System Performance Monitoring

Chapter 3 Calculating the WQCV and Volume Reduction

GUIDELINES FOR STORMWATER BACTERIA REDUCTIONS THROUGH BMP IMPLEMENTATION NY/NJ HARBOR TMDL DEVELOPMENT

ALMY POND TMDL MANAGEMENT PLAN

Tolin Hessell 4/21/2010. Literature Review on Stormwater Management Basin Retrofits. I. Introduction

EFFECT OF UPSTREAM DEVELOPMENT ON THE CLEAR CREEK AREA

Nutrient Management in. A presentation to the West Metro Water Alliance

WATER QUALITY DESIGN STORMS FOR STORMWATER HYDRODYNAMIC SEPARATORS

2733 Kanasita Drive, Suite 111 Chattanooga, TN Phone (423) June 20, 2014

Dual Media Filtration System for Reducing Pollutants in Storm Water Runoff

Chapter 6. Hydrology. 6.0 Introduction. 6.1 Design Rainfall

Pre-Treatment Bioretention Cells Bioswales IOWA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL DECEMBER 16, 2015

A Performance Evaluation of Porous Asphalt as a Stormwater Treatment Strategy January 2006

A Case for the Design and Modeling of BMP Infiltration and LID Techniques. By: Bob Murdock

Measuring solids concentrations in urban runoff: Methods of analysis

COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT REVIEW. Spring Lake Park Schools Westwood Middle School st Avenue NE, Spring Lake Park, MN 55432

STORMWATER INFILTRATION TRENCH RETROFIT UPDATE

Hydrodynamic Separation Product Calculator

APPENDIX H Guidance for Preparing/Reviewing CEQA Initial Studies and Environmental Impact Reports

ABSTRACT TREATMENT OF AGRICULTURAL STORMWATER RUNOFF BY A CASCADING SYSTEM OF FLOODWAY STORMWATER. Rosemary Myers, Master of Science, 2015

CHAPTER 10 PRELIMINARY TREATMENT

BMP #: Water Quality Inserts

Appendix B. Storm Drain System Data

NJCAT TECHNOLOGY VERIFICATION STORMWATER MANAGEMENT, INC.

APPENDIX D STORMWATER QUALITY CONTROL INFORMATION AND INFILTRATION SIZING

DOWNSTREAM DEFENDER TESTING USING MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROTOCOL UTILIZING OK-110 FEED SAND

Amendments to Filtration for Improving Water Quality Treatment. Andy Erickson, Research Fellow St. Anthony Falls Laboratory September 13, 2012

NJCAT TECHNOLOGY VERIFICATION. Up-Flo Filter Hydro International

Large-Scale Sediment Retention Device Testing (ASTM D 7351) FLEXSTORM Inlet Filter

Pennsylvania Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual. Chapter 3. Stormwater Management Principles and Recommended Control Guidelines

Stormwater Quality Extended Detention Basin Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Manual. for: Located at: Prepared for: Prepared by:

Module 10b: Gutter and Inlet Designs and Multiple Design Objectives

Use of SWAT for Urban Water Management Projects in Texas

Urban Stormwater Runoff Phosphorus Loading and BMP Treatment Capabilities

Municipal Stormwater Management Planning

Review Zone Application for D&R Canal Commission Decision

Filterra Bioretention System Water Quality and Hydrologic Field-Scale Performance Evaluation

DESIGN BULLETIN #16/2003 (Revised July 2007) Drainage Guidelines for Highways Under Provincial Jurisdiction in Urban Areas.

Subject: BaySaver Technologies Submittal for Bayseparator and Bayfilter Technologies

4.3.6 Surface Sand Filters

Grass Channel KEY CONSIDERATIONS STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SUITABILITY FEASIBILITY CONSIDERATIONS OTHER CONSIDERATIONS POLLUTANT REMOVAL

POLLUTION PREVENTION AFTER CONSTRUCTION

Storm Drain Inlet Protection

NJCAT TECHNOLOGY VERIFICATION. First Defense HC Stormwater Treatment Device. Hydro International

Nutrient Removal Mechanisms in a Cold Climate Gravel Wetland Alison Watts, Robert Roseen, Kim Farah, Heather Gilbert, Jamie Houle

Constructed Wetland Channel T-9

Conditional Interim Certification Findings

Re-plumbing Roadside Ditch Networks

Structural Stormwater Pollution Reduction Targeting Floatables, Gross-Pollutants, and Trash in Myrtle Beach

PROJECT AT THE DENVER

George Deforest Fowler BA Biology, Stonehill College, 1999

Construction and Monitoring Performance of Filterra and BioPave TM Units in Fayetteville, NC

Pennsylvania Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual

WEFTEC 2006, Dallas, Texas FULL SCALE EVALUATION OF THE UPFLO TM FILTER - A CATCHBASIN INSERT FOR THE TREATMENT OF STORMWATER AT CRITICAL SOURCE AREAS

the 2001 season. Allison brought high winds and street flooding to Houston, after

Standards for Soil Erosion and Sediment Control in New Jersey May 2012 STANDARD FOR SLOPE PROTECTION STRUCTURES. Definition

[Rev - 1] 06/

Sacramento Stormwater Quality Partnership Mercury Programs

Evaluation of the Stormwater Management StormFilter for the removal of SIL-CO-SIL 106, a standardized silica product:

Background / Regulatory Requirements

TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP CODE

City of Katy Flood Protection Study (Meeting 3 of 3) October 23, 2017

AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE OPTIMAL THICKNESS OF A SAND LAYER IN A SAND FILTER WATER QUALITY STRUCTURE. July 1994

UMD Storm Water Program Construction Requirements. Greg Archer, MBA Environmental Compliance Specialist

Sizing Criteria Worksheets and Examples

Objective 1: Manage the demonstration site using common agricultural practices and monitor runoff quantity and quality.

Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri. September 2013

AD26 Systems for Iron, Manganese, Sulfide and Arsenic Removal

Porous Pavement Flow Paths

Simple Method for Estimating Phosphorus Export

Preliminary Drainage Analysis

Doyle Park Reconstruction Project Improving Flood Control Facilities to Meet a TMDL

Chapter 2 BMP Selection

E. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

Transcription:

Field Verification of Performance of an Engineered Phosphorus Removal Media Deployed in a Flow Based Stormwater Filter Gretchen Tellessen 1, Vaikko Allen 2* 1 Contech Engineered Solutions, Portland, Oregon. 2 Contech Engineered Solutions, Ojai, California. * Email: vallen@conteches.com ABSTRACT A lightweight phosphorus removal media has been has been demonstrated to remove particulate bound and dissolved phosphorus in laboratory studies and in field studies using the media in a downstream of detention. To investigate the utility of the media in a flow based design without upstream detention or pretreatment, a field evaluation was performed at a medium use road site in ZigZag, Oregon following the Technology Assessment Protocol Ecology (WADOE, 2011). A total of 19 qualified runoff events have been sampled, all with detectable influent concentrations of both total phosphorus (TP) and total suspended solids (TSS). For these events the median and mean removal efficiencies for TP were 72% and 66% respectively. The median and mean removal efficiencies for TSS are 92% and 89% respectively. Initial data suggests that the media deployed in a flow based media filter can provide significant phosphorus load reductions. KEYWORDS: Phosphorus, media filter, activated alumina, perlite, total suspended solids, suspended solids concentration, stormwater, Technology Assessment Protocol Ecology (TAPE). INTRODUCTION Phosphorus is a common cause of impairment in fresh water bodies throughout the United States. In urban watersheds, loads contributed by stormwater runoff can be a dominant source. As a result, phosphorus removal requirements are increasingly common and innovative phosphorus removal technologies are needed that can be integrated into an urban environment. A lightweight phosphorus removal media comprised of a perlite base with an activated alumina coating has been developed for use in media filtration systems. In addition to providing physical filtration of phosphorus bearing solids, adsorption of dissolved phosphorus has been demonstrated in laboratory based studies using this media. Field studies have previously been conducted using the media in a media filter downstream of detention, resulting in total phosphorus load reductions of 60% or greater. Detention based designs provide several benefits including pretreatment of solids by gravitational separation and peak flow attenuation in the detention system, however they are relatively large and costly compared to flow through designs without detention. To investigate the utility of the media in a flow based design without upstream detention or pretreatment of any kind, a field evaluation was performed at a typical site located in Western Oregon. The project plan for this evaluation was designed to conform to guidelines outlined in the Technical Guidance Manual for Evaluating Emerging Stormwater Treatment

Technology Assessment Protocol Ecology (TAPE) as written by the Washington State Department of Ecology (TAPE, 2011). SITE AND SYSTEM The evaluation site (the Lolo Pass Road evaluation site) is located in Zigzag, Oregon and is situated at the west protruding end of Zigzag Mountain in the foothills of Mt. Hood and sits approximately 425 m (1400 feet) above sea level. The site, located on Lolo Pass Road at Bear Creek Bridge, is a 100% impervious, medium-use road managed by the Clackamas County Department of Transportation and Development. Drainage area of the site is 250 m 2 (2800 ft 2 ) of bridge deck and is located near the intersection of Lolo Pass Road and US Highway 26 (Lat: 45.34420862, Lon: -121.94275218). The site is swept periodically, but significant amounts of sediment and organic debris are typically present on site. Sanding, graveling, and de-icing occur on the site as necessary during the winter to control ice accumulation and assist with tire traction. The time of concentration (t c ) on the site is estimated to be 1.4 minutes. A photo of the drainage area can be seen in Figure 1. Figure 1. View of the drainage area of the stormwater treatment evaluation site located on Lolo Pass Road, ZigZag, Oregon. The stormwater treatment system evaluated at the Lolo Pass Road evaluation site is a flow based treatment unit which contains one 46 cm (18 inch) tall radial flow filter cartridge. The filter cartridge has an 18 cm (7 inch) inch media bed depth designed to operate at a specific flow rate of 70 L/m/M 2 (1.67 gpm/ft 2 ) or 47 L/m (12.5 gpm) per cartridge. The media used in this evaluation is lightweight phosphorus removal media comprised of a perlite base with an activated alumina coating. This engineered phosphorus removal media provides stormwater treatment by physical filtration of solids, including phosphorus bearing solids as well as the adsorption of dissolved phosphorus. DATA COLLECTION METHODS The equipment and sampling techniques used for this study are in accordance with the 2011 version of the Washington State Department of Ecology TAPE. A full maintenance of the stormwater treatment unit was performed at the beginning of the evaluation period. Maintenance involved the removal of all material within the unit and associated conveyance, removal of the

used media cartridge, and installation of a new media cartridge containing the engineered phosphorus removal media. Immediately following maintenance all monitoring equipment was installed and the sampling period was initiated. Influent and effluent flows were measured continuously throughout the evaluation period using large 60 V trapezoidal flumes in conjunction with individual ISCO 730 bubbler flow modules. Each flow module was connected to an individual ISCO 6712 Portable Automated Sampler. Precipitation was also analyzed continuously though the evaluation with a 0.023 cm (0.01-inch) resolution Texas Electronics tipping bucket rain gage. Individual volume-paced influent and effluent samples were collected over the course of each qualified storm event using individual ISCO 6712 Portable Automated Samplers. At the conclusion of each qualified runoff event, individual influent and effluent samples were combined to create influent and effluent bulk composite samples. Event Mean Concentration (EMC) subsamples were then taken from the bulk composite sample and submitted to Apex Laboratories, LLC in Beaverton, Oregon for analysis. Samples were analyzed for total suspended solids (TSS), suspended solids concentration (SSC), total phosphorus (TP), and dissolved phosphorus. WATER QUALITY RESULTS A total of 19 qualified runoff events were sampled at the evaluation site between February 2012 and June 2013. Of the 19 events sampled; 1) the total rainfall was greater than 0.38 cm (0.15 in) for all storm events sampled, 2) the minimum event duration was greater than one hour for all events sampled, 3) the minimum inter event (antecedent) period was greater than 6 hours with rainfall < 0.10 cm (0.04 in) for all but two events (events 9 and 11), 4) volume paced composite samples covered a minimum of 60% of the total flow for all storm events sampled, and 5) the minimum influent and effluent aliquots per sample event was 7. All 19 events were determined to be qualified based on data collection guidelines set up for this evaluation and are presented in Table 1. Table 1. Qualified runoff event data collection requirement results for the 19 storm events sampled at the Lolo Pass Road evaluation site.

Event Date Total precipitation depth Maximum precipitation intensity Avgerge precipitation intensity Precipitation duration Influent coverage Effluent Antecedent coverage dry period Number of aliquots (mm) (mm/hr) (mm/hr) (hours) (%) (%) (hours) (inf:eff) 2/20/1012 16 3.0 1.0 17 96 84 21 10:7 2/14/2012 9 1.5 0.5 19 79 76 21 7:7 2/17/2012 34 3.6 1.0 46 94 97 18 40:32 2/20/2012 60 3.6 1.5 44 67 76 14 48:45 2/24/2012 20 3.3 1.8 11 100 91 31 23:17 3/10/2012 15 2.3 0.5 33 100 62 89 20:8 3/12/2012* 11 2.5 1.5 6.5 84 95 28 14:12 3/29/2012 119 8.6 2.8 48 69 75 26 48:45 5/24/2012 12 3.6 2.0 5.5 91 80 4 13:15 6/1/2012 22 3.8 2.8 8.0 98 99 104 32:37 6/4/2012 20 3.3 1.5 13 91 92 5 24:25 6/7/2012 19 3.6 1.3 13 92 89 36 24:25 11/6/2012 12 3.3 1.3 8.3 100 98 >6 13:16 11/11/2012 40 5.8 2.0 19 64 60 >6 32:31 11/23/2012 40 4.6 2.3 19 70 74 >6 48:41 11/30/2012 18 6.6 1.5 18 77 96 >6 27:15 5/17/2013 7 1.8 0.8 10 66 69 13 16:13 5/21/2013 18 4.6 2.5 7.0 97 95 10 35:28 6/25/2013 18 7.1 3.6 5.0 68 75 >6 35:28 *backup rain gage data used for this event due to rain gage equip ment issues All 19 events had detectable influent concentrations for TSS, SSC, and total phosphorus and can be seen in Table 2. Minimum, maximum, median and mean influent and effluent concentrations for these constituents are also presented in Table 2. Samples were also analyzed for dissolved phosphorus using EPA Method 200.7, however only two events had detectable influent concentration of dissolved phosphorus. Both events showed positive removal of dissolved phosphorus but the limited data set is not sufficient to continue with further analysis and discussion. Table 2. Influent and effluent concentrations for the stormwater treatment unit with engineered phosphorus removal media for the 19 storm events sampled at the Lolo Pass Road evaluation site.

Parameter Analytical Method TSS SSC Total Phosphorus SM 2540D ASTM D3977 SM 4500PF Sample Location Influent Effluent Influent Effluent Influent Effluent Event 1 182 63 180 68.2 0.141 0.104 Event 2 539 32 404 35.0 0.220 0.0620 Event 3 387 48 414 53.5 0.310 0.0674 Event 4 246 ND 258 12.1 0.163 0.0259 Event 5 512 43 507 52.7 0.424 0.0701 Event 6 360 27 430 ND 0.140 0.0490 Event 7 150 18 220 ND 0.150 0.0370 Event 8 370 47 390 58.0 0.280 0.0810 Event 9 510 43 830 47.0 0.170 0.0700 Event 10 780 16 960 ND 0.200 0.0350 Event 11 580 32 1000 30.0 0.210 0.0043 Event 12 570 120 780 120 0.170 0.140 Event 13 40.0 10 46.0 9.00 0.068 ND Event 14 100 14 92.0 16.0 0.076 ND Event 15 110 ND 120 7.60 0.082 ND Event 16 230 17 230 15.0 0.170 ND Event 17 94.0 6.0 211 7.59 0.282 0.0300 Event 18 389 24 484 21.4 0.558 0.0498 Event 19 308 21 710 19.0 0.583 0.0452 Min 40.0 6.00 46.0 7.59 0.068 0.0043 Max 780 120 1000 120 0.583 0.140 Median 360 27.0 404 25.7 0.170 0.0498 Mean 340 34.2 435 35.8 0.231 0.0580 PERFORMANCE SUMMARY Significant reductions in TP, TSS and SSC pollutant loads were observed between influent and effluent sampling locations. Performance was calculated using two different methods, the Efficiency Ratio (ER) method and the Summation of Loads (SOL) efficiency calculation method. The ER method defines the efficiency as the average event mean concentration of pollutants over a given time period. Equation 2: 1 The ER method assumes; 1) The weight of all storm events is equal regardless of the relative magnitude of the storm event and 2) that if all storm events at the site had been monitored, the average inlet and outlet EMCs would be similar to those that were monitored (URS/ EPA 1999). A summary of ER performance data for TP, TSS and SSC for the 19 sampled events is presented in Table 3.

Table 3. Performance calculated using the Efficiency Ratio (ER) method for the stormwater treatment unit with engineered phosphorus removal media for the 19 events sampled at the Lolo Pass Road evaluation site. Parameter TSS SSC Total Phosphorus Sample Location Influent Effluent Influent Effluent Influent Effluent Mean 340 34.2 435 35.8 0.231 0.0580 Efficiency Ratio 90% 92% 75% Performance was also calculated using the Summation of Loads (SOL) efficiency calculation method. The SOL method defines the efficiency as a percentage based on the ratio of the summation of all influent loads to the summation of all effluent loads. Equation 2: 1 The SOL method assumes; 1) monitoring data accurately represents the actual entire total loads in and out of the BMP for a period long enough to overshadow any temporary storage or export of pollutants and 2) any significant storm events that were not monitored had a ratio of inlet to effluent loads similar to the storms events that were monitored (URS/ EPA 1999). SOL efficiency results for TP, TSS and SSC for the 19 sampled events is presented in Table 4. Table 4. Summation of Loads (SOL) efficiency calculations for the stormwater treatment unit with engineered phosphorus removal media for the 19 storm events sampled at the Lolo Pass Road evaluation site. Parameter TSS (g) Sample Location Influent Effluent Influent Effluent Influent Effluent Total 43352 3577 54426 3691 33643 7228 SOL Efficiency 92% 93% 79% SSC (g) Total Phosphorus (mg) Particle size distribution information collected during sampled events confirms that the influent solids have a silt loam distribution which is typical for the Pacific Northwest. ph was measured on site at the time of sample collection for all storm events using EPA Method 105.1. Median influent and effluent EMCs were 6.7 and 6.6 respectively. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION An engineered phosphorus removal media contained in a radial flow filter cartridge, deployed in a flow based stormwater treatment unit without upstream detention or pretreatment of any kind, was tested for the removal of solids and total phosphorus. A total of 19 qualified runoff events were sampled over a 17 month period beginning in February 2012.

Positive removal of total phosphorus was observed for all of the 19 sampled events. Performance calculated using the Efficiency Ratio method and the Summation of Loads efficiency calculation method were 75% and 79% respectively. These results show reductions in total phosphorus above the requirements currently outlined by most regulatory agencies. This engineered phosphorus removal media would be a good choice for stormwater treatment in phosphorus sensitive areas. Positive removal of solids was also observed for all 19 sampled events. TSS and SSC performance calculated using the Efficiency Ratio method were 90% and 92% respectively. TSS and SSC performance calculated using the Summation of Loads efficiency calculation method were 92% and 93% respectively. Again, these results show reductions above requirements currently outlined by most regulatory agencies. This is significant in that the engineered phosphorus removal media can be used for both solids and phosphorus removal without any additional treatment. Overall, the data collected during this evaluation suggests that the engineered phosphorus removal media deployed in a flow based media filter can provide significant load reduction for TSS, SSC, and total phosphorus at or above levels dictated by stormwater permitting requirements and TMDL compliance plans. Data also suggests that using this media can provide TSS, SSC, and total phosphorus load reductions without significant upstream flow attenuation or pretreatment. REFERENCES URS Greiner Woodward Clyde, Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, Urban Water Resources Research Council (UWRRC) of ASCE, Office of Water, US Environmental Protection Agency (URS/EPA) (1999). Development of Performance Measures Task 3.1 Technical Memorandum Determining Urban Stormwater Best Management Practice (BMP) Removal Efficiencies. Washington, D.C. Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology). (2011). Guidance for Evaluating Emerging Stormwater Treatment Technologies: Technology Assessment Protocol Ecology (TAPE). Olympia, Washington.