Example Waste Utilization / Nutrient Management Plan. Revised 7/05

Similar documents
PENNSYLVANIA PHOSPHORUS INDEX UPDATE

Antonio Mallarino Professor, Department of Agronomy. Introduction

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT (ac.) CODE 590

Manure Management Manual Revisions

COMPREHENSIVE NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST FOR CERTIFIED CNMP PROVIDERS

New Practices for Nutrient Reduction: STRIPs and Saturated Buffers. Matthew Helmers and Tom Isenhart Iowa State University

December 2002 Issue # PHOSPHORUS MANAGEMENT ON HIGH PHOSPHORUS SOILS. Angela Ebeling, Keith Kelling, and Larry Bundy 1/ Introduction

Agriculture Action Packet DRAFT Attachment # FARM MAP EXAMPLE DRAFT

HOW CHANGES IN NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS WILL AFFECT FORAGE PRODUCTION

THE FUTURE OF NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT IN WISCONSIN

SOIL P-INDEXES: MINIMIZING PHOSPHORUS LOSS. D. Beegle, J. Weld, P. Kleinman, A. Collick, T. Veith, Penn State & USDA-ARS

Missouri Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation Nutrient Management Technical Standard

IA NRS Cost Tool Overview Tyndall & Bowman, 2016 Draft

Nutrient Management in. A presentation to the West Metro Water Alliance

Small-Scale Farmers and the Environment: How to be a Good Steward

BMP Verification: What is it and How Will it Impact Pennsylvania?

Livestock and Poultry Environmental Learning Center Webcast Series June 20, From: G. Albrecht P. Ristow

Phosphorus Dynamics and Mitigation in Soils

Mud Lake Lakeshed Assessment

7.10 BRA Sediment Reduction Program

Act 38 Nutrient Balance Sheet Standard Format Word Version User Guide & Sample Nutrient Balance Sheet October 2017

Agricultural/Rural Riparian Buffer Analysis

Wisconsin Wastewater Operators Association. Protecting Our Water Resources: The Future Bill Hafs - NEW Water 10/2014

LPES Small Farms Fact Sheets* Small-Scale Farmers and the Environment: How to be a Good Steward. By Mark Rice, North Carolina State University

NITROGEN MANAGEMENT PLAN SUMMARY REPORT

Iowa Nutrient Reduction Strategy: Background Information

Land Application of Manure

Riparian Buffers and Stream Restoration

History of Model Development at Temple, Texas. J. R. Williams and J. G. Arnold

Implementation of Priority CRP Conservation Practices and Estimated Nutrient Load Reductions

Nutrient Management in Kentucky

Grazing Land Management and Water Quality

MDA BMP Functional Equivalents. Update WQGIT 11/12/13

Little Bear Watershed

What Works: Farming Practices

Managing Upland Grazing to Restore Soil Health and Farm Livelihoods

L-THIA Online and LID in a watershed investigation

Very slight to negligible limitations no special land management practices required.

LPES Small Farms Fact Sheets* Got Barnyard Runoff? By Chris Henry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, and Joe Harner, Kansas State University

DELINEATING AGRICULTURE IN THE NEUSE RIVER BASIN

WVU Extension Fertility Recommendation Tool (FRT) for Small Farms

On-Field Ohio! Evaluate/Revise the Ohio P Risk Index using Field Scale Edge-of-Field Monitoring Data

Conservation Planning. Steve Barker, Resource Management Systems LLC

Background. AEM Tier 2 Worksheet Stream & Floodplain Management. Glossary

A Presentation of the 2011 IA MN SD Drainage Research Forum. November 22, 2011 Okoboji, Iowa

Pennsylvania Inter-Agency Nutrient Management Annual Conference TECHNICAL MANUAL VERSION 10 UPDATE

Land Application and Nutrient Management

Erosion and Sediment Control Plan for a Timber Harvesting Operation

Gypsum Use to Reduce P Loss From Agricultural Fields 2013

Protecting Your Water and Air Resources

LAND APPLICATION OF SWINE MANURE

Tech Manual Update Bulletin

DRAFT Great Bay Nitrogen Non-Point Source Study

Narragansett Bay and Watershed Restoration Bond Fund

Natural Resources & Environmental Stewardship

Saturated Buffer. Subsurface Drainage PURPOSE N REDUCTION LOCATION COST BARRIERS

Cropping System Nutrient Management

Vermont Phosphorus Index User Guide. version 6.0 October 2017

Recordkeeping Manure and Fertilizer. Marilyn L. Thelen, Educator MSU Extension

The Vermont Dairy Farm Sustainability Project, Inc.

NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE CONSERVATION PRACTICE STANDARD NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT

Integrating Water Quality and Natural Filters into Maryland s Marine Spatial Planning Efforts

AG-LAND Investment Brokers 275 Sale Lane Red Bluff, CA Fax Corning Eucalyptus Farm

Ponds. Pond A water impoundment made by excavating a pit, or constructing a dam or an embankment.

Current Nutrient Management Strategies for Poultry Production. Josh B. Payne, Ph.D. Animal Waste Mgmt. Specialist

PRESCRIBED GRAZING (Ac.)

MARK CREEK DEMONSTRATION PROJECT

12/28/2016. Air. Surface Water. Ground Water. Soil. 1. Calculate agronomic rate. 2. Identify optimal fields. 3. Determine when to apply

Overall Instructions

Ecosystem Service Tradeoffs in the Implementation of the Bay TMDL

VIDEO: Riparian Forest Buffers: The Link Between Land & Water

Improving Soil Health with Grazing

The Value of Buffers

Nutrient and Sediment Modeling of the Yahara Lakes Watershed

Wildlife Management Intensity Standards

FERTILIZING SUGARBEET

HEALTH SOIL MEANS Healthy Farms and Cleaner Water!

LAND APPLICATION OF POULTRY MANURE

WATERSHED. Maitland Valley. Report Card 201

Ranch Water Quality Plan Template for. Napa River & Sonoma Creek Watersheds

Benefits and Damages Statement

Rangeland Conservation Effects Assessment Program (CEAP)

West Fork White River Watershed Conservation Map Summaries. Prepared for the Beaver Watershed Alliance. By the Watershed Conservation Resource Center

Phosphorus Site Index (PSI) and the Phosphorus Management Tool (PMT)

Nutrient Management in Crop Production

Fertilization of Perennial Grasses. Jack E. Rechcigl & Martin B. Adjei Gulf Coast REC & Range Cattle REC, UF/IFAS

Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund. Gregg J. Cassidy RI DEM, Sustainable Watersheds Office

Using No-till and Cover Crops to Reduce Phosphorus Runoff

Extending the Summer Grazing Season. John Jennings Professor - Forage Specialist

ALFALFA FERTILITY AND COMPOST MANAGEMENT. Glenn E. Shewmaker 1 and Jason Ellsworth RATIONALE

Environmental Information Worksheet

C O M P R E H E N S I V E P R O T E C T I O N & R E S T O R AT I O N P L A N. f or th e

PA Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) TMDL Plan

Precision Ag. Back to Basics

Water Quality Improvement Through Implementation of a Watershed Protection Plan in the Leon River Watershed

NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE CONSERVATION PRACTICE STANDARD NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT. (Ac.) CODE 590

Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts

Maryland Nutrient Management Program

Action Packet for Agriculture

Using Dairy Manure as a Fertilizer Source for Forage Crops. Workgroup. Marsha Campbell Mathews University of California Farm Advisor Stanislaus County

Transcription:

Example Waste Utilization / Nutrient Management Plan Revised 7/05

Step 1 - Locate Operation Locate on Topo Map first. Note if any named streams or water bodies present within 2000 feet of the application area of any field, look for other areas of environmental significance.

Dairy Facility Name of Topo Quad

Step - 2 Locate operation on a soil map. If published soil survey is not available Contact county office to see if they have maps available If no maps available locally, have office contact Area Resource Soil Scientist to get mapping done.

Step - 3 Again, note if any named water bodies present within 2000 feet of the application area of any field, look for other areas of environmental significance. Check soils to see if any are frequently flooded.

Site visit Step - 4 Discuss operation with producer and mention need to get soil tests on all application fields Gather facility data needed for waste utilization plan Record slope of the predominant soil of each field Note quality of perennial grass cover Record cropping system in cropland Record yield goal for crops

Develop plan map Step - 5 Operation may be located on an aerial photo. A sketch of the property can be made. You must have current soil test results for each field before you can complete plan.

Plan Map N 1 - Headquarters - 9.0 ac 2 - Pasture - 9.5 3 - Pasture - 27.9 ac 4 - Pasture - 8.7 ac 5 - Hay land - 44.0 ac 6 - Wildlife land - 11.5 ac 7 Hay Land- 24.8 ac 8 Hay Land - 16.1 ac Dairy Lagoons 3 4 6 7 Dairy Blds. 5 Scale 1:7920 Well 2 8 1

Step - 6 Create an application area map Show buffers Filter Strips Other out areas Adjust field acreage due to these out areas

Application Area Map Riparian Forested Buffer Filter Strip Other non-application areas N Acres Available For Application 1 - Headquarters - 0.0 ac 2 - Pasture - 6.3 3 - Pasture - 0.0 ac 4 - Pasture - 7.7 ac 5 Hay Land - 40.5 ac 6 - Wildlife land - 0.0 ac 3 4 6 7 7 Hay land - 20.7 ac 8 Hay land - 10.6 ac Dairy Lagoons Dairy Blds. 5 Scale 1:7920 Well 2 8 1

Step - 7 Locate fields on soil map. Find soil information needed for P-Index P Index or other waste utilization planning Soil legend Soil and Water Features Physical & Chemical Properties of Soil

Soil Map - Madison Erath County TX Sheet #2 N 4 6 7 3 5 1 8 Scale 1:7920 2

Erath

Erath

Step 8 Confer with engineer in charge of designing the waste management system in order to get quantities of waste to be land applied. Start entering data into ag. waste utilization / nutrient management spreadsheet.

Step - 9 Complete P-Index P Index for each field to be used for waste application.

Application Area Map Riparian Forested Buffer Filter Strip Other non-application areas N Acres Available For Application 1 - Headquarters - 0.0 ac 2 - Pasture - 6.3 3 - Pasture - 0.0 ac 4 - Pasture - 7.7 ac 5 Hay Land - 40.5 ac 6 - Wildlife land - 0.0 ac 3 4 6 7 7 Hay land - 20.7 ac 8 Hay land - 10.6 ac Dairy Lagoons Dairy Blds. 5 Scale 1:7920 Well 2 8 1

Fields 2, 4, 5, 7, & 8 will be used for waste application. Soil test P results are: Field 2-405 ppm (Very High) Field 4-70 ppm (Very High) Field 5-50 ppm (High) Field 7-9 ppm (Low) Field 8-12 ppm (Medium)

Start with Field 2 P Index

Client Name: Dairy Field(s): 2 Date: 3/5/2005 Planner: Location: Crop: Coastal Grazing Impaired Watershed: Yes Runoff Curve No.: 74 Slope (%): 2 Site Characteristic Soil Test P Level PHOSPHORUS INDEX WORKSHEET for East Texas Place an X in the approprate box for each of the Site Characteristic listed below. N/A Very Low -Low Moderate High Very High Sub Total Phosphorus Fertilizer ( ) Application Rate Organic Phosphorus ( ) Application Rate None Applied 1-40 lbs/ac 41-90 lbs/ac 91-150 lbs/ac None Applied 1-40 lbs/ac 41-90 lbs/ac 91-150 lbs/ac >150 lbs/ac >150 lbs/ac Phosphorus Fertilizer Application Method and Timing None Applied Placed Deeper than 2 in. or broadcast w ith incorporation w ithin 48 hrs. 12/1-2/15 2/16-4/15 or 6/16-11/30 Surface Applied 4/16-6/15 Organic Phosphorus Source Application Method and Timing None Applied Placed Deeper than 2 in. or broadcast w ith incorporation w ithin 48 hrs. 12/1-2/15 2/16-4/15 or 6/16-11/30 Surface Applied 4/16-6/15 Proximity of Nearest Field Edge to Named Stream or Lake Runoff Class (Runoff Class Table) Soil Erosion (All Sources) Very Low >2000 feet Low 1000-1999 feet Medium 500-999 feet High 100-499 feet Very High <100 feet Negligible Very Low or Low Moderate High Very High Very Low <1 t/ac Low 1-3 t/ac Medium 3-5 t/ac High 5-10 t/ac Very High >10 t/ac Total Index Points:

Site Characteristic #1 Soil Test P Level 405 ppm P = Very High

Client Name: Dairy Field(s): 2 Date: 3/5/2005 Planner: Location: Crop: Coastal Grazing Impaired Watershed: Yes Runoff Curve No.: 74 Slope (%): 2 Site Characteristic Soil Test P Level Phosphorus Fertilizer ( ) Application Rate PHOSPHORUS INDEX WORKSHEET for East Texas Place an X in the approprate box for each of the Site Characteristic listed below. N/A Very Low -Low Moderate High None Applied 1-40 lbs/ac 41-90 lbs/ac 91-150 lbs/ac Very High Sub Total x 8.00 >150 lbs/ac Organic Phosphorus ( ) Application Rate None Applied 1-40 lbs/ac 41-90 lbs/ac 91-150 lbs/ac >150 lbs/ac Phosphorus Fertilizer Application Method and Timing None Applied Placed Deeper than 2 in. or broadcast w ith incorporation w ithin 48 hrs. 12/1-2/15 2/16-4/15 or 6/16-11/30 Surface Applied 4/16-6/15 Organic Phosphorus Source Application Method and Timing None Applied Placed Deeper than 2 in. or broadcast w ith incorporation w ithin 48 hrs. 12/1-2/15 2/16-4/15 or 6/16-11/30 Surface Applied 4/16-6/15 Proximity of Nearest Field Edge to Named Stream or Lake Runoff Class (Runoff Class Table) Soil Erosion (All Sources) Very Low >2000 feet Low 1000-1999 feet Medium 500-999 feet High 100-499 feet Very High <100 feet Negligible Very Low or Low Moderate High Very High Very Low <1 t/ac Low 1-3 t/ac Medium 3-5 t/ac High 5-10 t/ac Very High >10 t/ac Total Index Points: 8.00

Site Characteristic #2 P Fertilizer Application Rate none

Client Name: Dairy Field(s): 2 Date: 3/5/2005 Planner: Location: Crop: Coastal Grazing Impaired Watershed: Yes Runoff Curve No.: 74 Slope (%): 2 Site Characteristic Soil Test P Level Phosphorus Fertilizer ( ) Application Rate Organic Phosphorus ( ) Application Rate PHOSPHORUS INDEX WORKSHEET for East Texas Place an X in the approprate box for each of the Site Characteristic listed below. N/A Very Low -Low Moderate High Very High Sub Total x 8.00 None Applied 1-40 lbs/ac 41-90 lbs/ac 91-150 lbs/ac >150 lbs/ac x 0.00 None Applied 1-40 lbs/ac 41-90 lbs/ac 91-150 lbs/ac >150 lbs/ac Phosphorus Fertilizer Application Method and Timing None Applied Placed Deeper than 2 in. or broadcast w ith incorporation w ithin 48 hrs. 12/1-2/15 2/16-4/15 or 6/16-11/30 Surface Applied 4/16-6/15 Organic Phosphorus Source Application Method and Timing None Applied Placed Deeper than 2 in. or broadcast w ith incorporation w ithin 48 hrs. 12/1-2/15 2/16-4/15 or 6/16-11/30 Surface Applied 4/16-6/15 Proximity of Nearest Field Edge to Named Stream or Lake Runoff Class (Runoff Class Table) Soil Erosion (All Sources) Very Low >2000 feet Low 1000-1999 feet Medium 500-999 feet High 100-499 feet Very High <100 feet Negligible Very Low or Low Moderate High Very High Very Low <1 t/ac Low 1-3 t/ac Medium 3-5 t/ac High 5-10 t/ac Very High >10 t/ac Total Index Points: 8.00

Site Characteristic #3 Organic P application rate Start with the > than 150 lb / ac rate. This will give you the highest value to begin with and then work back there, if enough acreage is available to reduce rate. Use a lower rate to start if you know the planned crop has a low P requirement.

Client Name: Dairy Field(s): 2 Date: 3/5/2005 Planner: Location: Crop: Coastal Grazing Impaired Watershed: Yes Runoff Curve No.: 74 Slope (%): 2 Site Characteristic Soil Test P Level Phosphorus Fertilizer ( ) Application Rate Organic Phosphorus ( ) Application Rate Phosphorus Fertilizer Application Method and Timing PHOSPHORUS INDEX WORKSHEET for East Texas Place an X in the approprate box for each of the Site Characteristic listed below. N/A Very Low -Low Moderate High Very High Sub Total x 8.00 None Applied 1-40 lbs/ac 41-90 lbs/ac 91-150 lbs/ac >150 lbs/ac x 0.00 None Applied 1-40 lbs/ac 41-90 lbs/ac 91-150 lbs/ac >150 lbs/ac x 6.00 None Applied Placed Deeper than 2 in. or broadcast w ith incorporation w ithin 48 hrs. 12/1-2/15 2/16-4/15 or 6/16-11/30 Surface Applied 4/16-6/15 Organic Phosphorus Source Application Method and Timing None Applied Placed Deeper than 2 in. or broadcast w ith incorporation w ithin 48 hrs. 12/1-2/15 2/16-4/15 or 6/16-11/30 Surface Applied 4/16-6/15 Proximity of Nearest Field Edge to Named Stream or Lake Runoff Class (Runoff Class Table) Soil Erosion (All Sources) Very Low >2000 feet Low 1000-1999 feet Medium 500-999 feet High 100-499 feet Very High <100 feet Negligible Very Low or Low Moderate High Very High Very Low <1 t/ac Low 1-3 t/ac Medium 3-5 t/ac High 5-10 t/ac Very High >10 t/ac Total Index Points: 14.00

Site Characteristic #4 P fertilizer application method and timing None applied

Client Name: Dairy Field(s): 2 Date: 3/5/2005 Planner: Location: Crop: Coastal Grazing Impaired Watershed: Yes Runoff Curve No.: 74 Slope (%): 2 Site Characteristic Soil Test P Level Phosphorus Fertilizer ( ) Application Rate Organic Phosphorus ( ) Application Rate Phosphorus Fertilizer Application Method and Timing Organic Phosphorus Source Application Method and Timing PHOSPHORUS INDEX WORKSHEET for East Texas Place an X in the approprate box for each of the Site Characteristic listed below. N/A Very Low -Low Moderate High Very High Sub Total x 8.00 None Applied 1-40 lbs/ac 41-90 lbs/ac 91-150 lbs/ac >150 lbs/ac x 0.00 None Applied 1-40 lbs/ac 41-90 lbs/ac 91-150 lbs/ac >150 lbs/ac x 6.00 None Applied Placed Deeper than 2 in. or broadcast w ith incorporation w ithin 48 hrs. 12/1-2/15 2/16-4/15 or 6/16-11/30 Surface Applied 4/16-6/15 x 0.00 Placed Deeper than 2 in. or Surface Applied None Applied broadcast w ith 2/16-4/15 or 12/1-2/15 4/16-6/15 incorporation 6/16-11/30 w ithin 48 hrs. Proximity of Nearest Field Edge to Named Stream or Lake Runoff Class (Runoff Class Table) Soil Erosion (All Sources) Very Low >2000 feet Low 1000-1999 feet Medium 500-999 feet High 100-499 feet Very High <100 feet Negligible Very Low or Low Moderate High Very High Very Low <1 t/ac Low 1-3 t/ac Medium 3-5 t/ac High 5-10 t/ac Very High >10 t/ac Total Index Points: 14.00

Site Characteristic #5 Organic P application method and timing Unless the dates shown in very high can be avoided you must check this box.

Client Name: Dairy Field(s): 2 Date: 3/5/2005 Planner: Location: Crop: Coastal Grazing Impaired Watershed: Yes Runoff Curve No.: 74 Slope (%): 2 Site Characteristic Soil Test P Level Phosphorus Fertilizer ( ) Application Rate Organic Phosphorus ( ) Application Rate Phosphorus Fertilizer Application Method and Timing Organic Phosphorus Source Application Method and Timing Proximity of Nearest Field Edge to Named Stream or Lake Runoff Class (Runoff Class Table) Soil Erosion (All Sources) PHOSPHORUS INDEX WORKSHEET for East Texas Place an X in the approprate box for each of the Site Characteristic listed below. N/A Very Low -Low Moderate High Very High Sub Total x 8.00 None Applied 1-40 lbs/ac 41-90 lbs/ac 91-150 lbs/ac >150 lbs/ac x 0.00 None Applied 1-40 lbs/ac 41-90 lbs/ac 91-150 lbs/ac >150 lbs/ac x 6.00 None Applied Placed Deeper than 2 in. or broadcast w ith incorporation w ithin 48 hrs. 12/1-2/15 2/16-4/15 or 6/16-11/30 Surface Applied 4/16-6/15 x 0.00 Placed Deeper than 2 in. or Surface Applied None Applied broadcast w ith 2/16-4/15 or 12/1-2/15 4/16-6/15 incorporation 6/16-11/30 w ithin 48 hrs. Very Low >2000 feet Low 1000-1999 feet Medium 500-999 feet High 100-499 feet Negligible Very Low or Low Moderate High Very High Very Low <1 t/ac Low 1-3 t/ac Medium 3-5 t/ac High 5-10 t/ac x 4.00 Very High <100 feet Very High >10 t/ac Total Index Points: 18.00

Site Characteristic #6 Proximity of nearest field edge to named stream or lake. See soil map 1000-1999 feet

Soil Map - Madison Erath County TX Sheet #2 N 4 6 7 3 5 1 8 Scale 1:7920 2

Client Name: Dairy Field(s): 2 Date: 3/5/2005 Planner: Location: Crop: Coastal Grazing Impaired Watershed: Yes Runoff Curve No.: 74 Slope (%): 2 Site Characteristic Soil Test P Level Phosphorus Fertilizer ( ) Application Rate Organic Phosphorus ( ) Application Rate Phosphorus Fertilizer Application Method and Timing Organic Phosphorus Source Application Method and Timing Proximity of Nearest Field Edge to Named Stream or Lake Runoff Class (Runoff Class Table) Soil Erosion (All Sources) PHOSPHORUS INDEX WORKSHEET for East Texas Place an X in the approprate box for each of the Site Characteristic listed below. N/A Very Low -Low Moderate High Very High Sub Total x 8.00 None Applied 1-40 lbs/ac 41-90 lbs/ac 91-150 lbs/ac >150 lbs/ac x 0.00 None Applied 1-40 lbs/ac 41-90 lbs/ac 91-150 lbs/ac >150 lbs/ac x 6.00 None Applied Placed Deeper than 2 in. or broadcast w ith incorporation w ithin 48 hrs. 12/1-2/15 2/16-4/15 or 6/16-11/30 Surface Applied 4/16-6/15 x 0.00 Placed Deeper than 2 in. or Surface Applied None Applied broadcast w ith 2/16-4/15 or 12/1-2/15 4/16-6/15 incorporation 6/16-11/30 w ithin 48 hrs. Very Low >2000 feet Low 1000-1999 feet Medium 500-999 feet High 100-499 feet x 4.00 Very High <100 feet x 1.25 Negligible Very Low or Low Moderate High Very High Very Low <1 t/ac Low 1-3 t/ac Medium 3-5 t/ac High 5-10 t/ac Very High >10 t/ac Total Index Points: 19.25

Runoff class Site Characteristic #7 Use predominant soil map unit for field 2 Use avg. field slope (2%) of that map unit (as determined in field) Find the hydrologic group for that soil Need to know field cover type and hydrologic condition.

Soil Map - Madison Erath County TX Sheet #2 N 4 6 7 3 5 1 8 Scale 1:7920 2

Erath

Table 3 Runoff Class Based on Field Slope and Runoff Curve Number Runoff Curve Number Slope % <50 50 to 60 60-70 70 to 80 > 80 < 1 N N N N M 1 to 2 N N VL L M >2 to 4 N N L M H >4 to 8 N VL M H VH >8 to 16 VL L M VH VH > 16 VL L H VH VH Refer to Texas NRCS Engineering Technical Note - Hydrology, No. 210-18-TX5, Estimating Runoff for Conservation Practices - 10/90 for information on runoff curve numbers. Estimating Runoff for Conservation Practices - 10/90 for information on runoff curve numbers. N = Negligible, VL = Very Low, L = Low, M = Moderate, H = High, VH = Very High Table 4 - Partial Listing of Curve Numbers 1/ Cover Type Hydrologic Condition 2/ Soil Hydrologic Group A B C D Pasture poor 68 79 86 89 fair 49 69 79 84 good 39 61 74 80 Hayland not grazed 30 58 71 78

Client Name: Dairy Field(s): 2 Date: 3/5/2005 Planner: Location: Crop: Coastal Grazing Impaired Watershed: Yes Runoff Curve No.: 74 Slope (%): 2 Site Characteristic Soil Test P Level Phosphorus Fertilizer ( ) Application Rate Organic Phosphorus ( ) Application Rate Phosphorus Fertilizer Application Method and Timing Organic Phosphorus Source Application Method and Timing Proximity of Nearest Field Edge to Named Stream or Lake Runoff Class (Runoff Class Table) Soil Erosion (All Sources) PHOSPHORUS INDEX WORKSHEET for East Texas Place an X in the approprate box for each of the Site Characteristic listed below. N/A Very Low -Low Moderate High Very High Sub Total x 8.00 None Applied 1-40 lbs/ac 41-90 lbs/ac 91-150 lbs/ac >150 lbs/ac x 0.00 None Applied 1-40 lbs/ac 41-90 lbs/ac 91-150 lbs/ac >150 lbs/ac x 6.00 None Applied Placed Deeper than 2 in. or broadcast w ith incorporation w ithin 48 hrs. 12/1-2/15 2/16-4/15 or 6/16-11/30 Surface Applied 4/16-6/15 x 0.00 Placed Deeper than 2 in. or Surface Applied None Applied broadcast w ith 2/16-4/15 or 12/1-2/15 4/16-6/15 incorporation 6/16-11/30 w ithin 48 hrs. Very Low >2000 feet Low 1000-1999 feet Medium 500-999 feet High 100-499 feet x 4.00 Very High <100 feet x 1.25 Negligible Very Low or Low Moderate High Very High Very Low <1 t/ac x 1.00 Low Medium High Very High 1-3 t/ac 3-5 t/ac 5-10 t/ac >10 t/ac

Site Characteristic #8 Soil Erosion must be controlled to acceptable levels For water erosion RUSLE2 can be used For wind erosion see field office General guidance - if the area is pasture or hayland erosion is <1 unless poor cover, then 1-3 tons per acre should be used Cropland - needs to be calculated, unless already in the file.

Client Name: Dairy Field(s): 2 Date: 3/5/2005 Planner: Location: Crop: Coastal Grazing Impaired Watershed: Yes Runoff Curve No.: 74 Slope (%): 2 Site Characteristic Soil Test P Level Phosphorus Fertilizer ( ) Application Rate Organic Phosphorus ( ) Application Rate Phosphorus Fertilizer Application Method and Timing Organic Phosphorus Source Application Method and Timing Proximity of Nearest Field Edge to Named Stream or Lake Runoff Class (Runoff Class Table) Soil Erosion (All Sources) PHOSPHORUS INDEX WORKSHEET for East Texas Place an X in the approprate box for each of the Site Characteristic listed below. N/A Very Low -Low Moderate High Very High Sub Total x 8.00 None Applied 1-40 lbs/ac 41-90 lbs/ac 91-150 lbs/ac >150 lbs/ac x 0.00 None Applied 1-40 lbs/ac 41-90 lbs/ac 91-150 lbs/ac >150 lbs/ac x 6.00 None Applied Placed Deeper than 2 in. or broadcast w ith incorporation w ithin 48 hrs. 12/1-2/15 2/16-4/15 or 6/16-11/30 Surface Applied 4/16-6/15 x 0.00 Placed Deeper than 2 in. or Surface Applied None Applied broadcast w ith 2/16-4/15 or 12/1-2/15 4/16-6/15 incorporation 6/16-11/30 w ithin 48 hrs. Very Low >2000 feet Low 1000-1999 feet Medium 500-999 feet High 100-499 feet x 4.00 Very High <100 feet x 1.25 Negligible Very Low or Low Moderate High Very High Very Low <1 t/ac x 1.00 Low Medium High Very High 1-3 t/ac 3-5 t/ac 5-10 t/ac >10 t/ac x 0.00 P Runoff Potential: Medium Total Index Points: 20.25

Post the P-Index P to the PI Report

Complete P Index for other Fields

Step - 10 Print waste sheet Review with producer

Step - 11 At this point you should point out to the producer fields with maximum application rates that could be adjusted to make better use of nutrients.