Thin Nitride Measurement Example

Similar documents
PROJECT PROPOSAL: OPTIMIZATION OF A TUNGSTEN CVD PROCESS

ALD systems and SENTECH Instruments GmbH

GETTING READY FOR DATA COLLECTION

CHAPTER 8 T Tests. A number of t tests are available, including: The One-Sample T Test The Paired-Samples Test The Independent-Samples T Test

Project 2 - β-endorphin Levels as a Response to Stress: Statistical Power

UV5 POSITIVE DUV PHOTORESIST For Microlithography Applications

Evaluation of Copper CMP Process Characterization Wafers

AcaStat How To Guide. AcaStat. Software. Copyright 2016, AcaStat Software. All rights Reserved.

A STUDY ON THE DEMAND OF MOBILE COUPONS AND THEIR POTENTIAL USE AT CHIPOTLE

Copyright K. Gwet in Statistics with Excel Problems & Detailed Solutions. Kilem L. Gwet, Ph.D.

F u = t n+1, t f = 1994, 2005

Ultra High Barrier Coatings by PECVD

Method to obtain TEOS PECVD Silicon Oxide Thick Layers for Optoelectronics devices Application

Timing Production Runs

In more specific form with respect to the economic damages expert industry, I. Introduction

Maple Samara Design and Dispersal. developed a technique of gliding (Alexander, 2002). In order for seeds to glide some

Photoresist Coat, Expose and Develop Laboratory Dr. Lynn Fuller

Plasma-Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition

A Deep Silicon RIE Primer Bosch Etching of Deep Structures in Silicon

NANO SCRATCH TESTING OF THIN FILM ON GLASS SUBSTRATE

University of Minnesota Nano Center Standard Operating Procedure

Via Fill in Small Trenches using Hot Aluminum Process. By Alice Wong

200mm Next Generation MEMS Technology update. Florent Ducrot

Technical Data Sheet Technisches Datenblatt

Business Intelligence, 4e (Sharda/Delen/Turban) Chapter 2 Descriptive Analytics I: Nature of Data, Statistical Modeling, and Visualization

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARKETING AND HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT (IJMHRM)

450mm Metrology and Inspection: The Current State and the Road Ahead. Rand Cottle (CNSE), Nithin Yathapu (GF), Katherine Sieg (Intel)

Slow DNA Transport through Nanopores in Hafnium Oxide Membranes

Descriptive Statistics Tutorial

Optical characterization of an amorphoushydrogenated carbon film and its application in phase modulated diffractive optical elements

Application of Statistical Methods to Analyze Groundwater Quality

White Paper: Pixelligent Internal Light Extraction Layer for OLED Lighting

Effect of alignment mark depth on alignment signal behavior in advanced lithography

Summary Statistics Using Frequency

micro resist technology

Optimizing Processes with Design of Experiments

Chart Recipe ebook. by Mynda Treacy

INTERVIA BPP-10 Photoresist

Why do Gage R&Rs fail?

13-5 The Kruskal-Wallis Test

STRUCTURE OF LED ENCAPSULATION SILICONES

A Statistical Analysis on Instability and Seasonal Component in the Price Series of Major Domestic Groundnut Markets in India

THE LEAD PROFILE AND OTHER NON-PARAMETRIC TOOLS TO EVALUATE SURVEY SERIES AS LEADING INDICATORS

MCC. PMGI Resists NANO PMGI RESISTS OFFER RANGE OF PRODUCTS

Unit 6: Simple Linear Regression Lecture 2: Outliers and inference

Processing guidelines. Negative Tone Photoresist Series ma-n 2400

Low temperature deposition of thin passivation layers by plasma ALD

Regression Analysis I & II

Materials Characterization

Crystalline silicon surface passivation with SiON:H films deposited by medium frequency magnetron sputtering

The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Consumers Attitudes at Northwestern Mutual: A Case Study

Exploratory Data Analysis

A is used to answer questions about the quantity of what is being measured. A quantitative variable is comprised of numeric values.

Measurement of thickness of native silicon dioxide with a scanning electron microscope


Plasma..TI'1eITI1 I.P.

SEMBIT SQA Unit Code F9J2 04 Carrying out capability studies

LAM 490 Etch Recipes. Dr. Lynn Fuller

Regression diagnostics

Poly-SiGe MEMS actuators for adaptive optics

a-sin x :H Antireflective And Passivation Layer Deposited By Atmospheric Pressure Plasma

SPI Supplies Brand MgO Magnesium Oxide Single Crystal Substrates, Blocks, and Optical Components

Measuring Consumer Expectation in Banking Sector: A Comparative Analysis

PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATIONS OF SPECIAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT

Oxide Growth. 1. Introduction

Study of a-sige:h Films and n-i-p Devices used in High Efficiency Triple Junction Solar Cells.

Homogeneity of material and optical properties in HEM grown sapphire

R&D ACTIVITIES AT ASSCP-BHEL,GURGAON IN SOLAR PV. DST-EPSRC Workshop on Solar Energy Research

EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS ON FRICTION WELDING PROCESS FOR DISSIMILAR MATERIALS USING DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS

FORECASTING THE GROWTH OF IMPORTS IN KENYA USING ECONOMETRIC MODELS

On-line patterned wafer thickness control of chemical-mechanical polishing

SECTION 11 ACUTE TOXICITY DATA ANALYSIS

PERFORMANCE OF CIVIL SERVANTS AS INFLUENCED BY FACTORS OF MOTIVATION IN GOVERNMENT MINISTRIES HEADQUARTERS IN NAIROBI, KENYA

Hierarchical Linear Modeling: A Primer 1 (Measures Within People) R. C. Gardner Department of Psychology

Lecture Day 2 Deposition

Rapid Thermal Processing (RTP) Dr. Lynn Fuller

"Plasma CVD passivation; Key to high efficiency silicon solar cells",

Experimental Design Day 2

Supporting Information

Combinatorial RF Magnetron Sputtering for Rapid Materials Discovery: Methodology and Applications

Temporal stability of a-si:h and a-sin x :H on crystalline silicon wafers

Basic Statistics, Sampling Error, and Confidence Intervals

5.8 Diaphragm Uniaxial Optical Accelerometer

SUMMiT V Five Level Surface Micromachining Technology Design Manual

Understanding and accounting for product

AP Stats ~ Lesson 8A: Confidence Intervals OBJECTIVES:

SPECIAL CONTROL CHARTS

Transmission Kikuchi Diffraction in the Scanning Electron Microscope

State of the art quality of a GeOx interfacial passivation layer formed on Ge(001)

R Sensor resistance (Ω) ρ Specific resistivity of bulk Silicon (Ω cm) d Diameter of measuring point (cm)

I ll start with a story in the high-school physics: the story about Isaac Newton s Law of Universal Gravitation.

Vampire Optical Coatings, Inc.

Steven L. Alderman, Michael S. Parsons, and Charles A. Waggoner. Institute for Clean Energy Technology, Mississippi State University

COMPATIBILITY OF THE ALTERNATIVE SEED LAYER (ASL) PROCESS WITH MONO- Si AND POLY-Si SUBSTRATES PATTERNED BY LASER OR WET ETCHING

ME 141B: The MEMS Class Introduction to MEMS and MEMS Design. Sumita Pennathur UCSB

Study on Infrared Absorption Characteristics of Ti and TiN x Nanofilms. Mingquan Yuan, Xiaoxiong Zhou, Xiaomei Yu

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 92 (2016 ) Mathieu Boccard*, Nathan Rodkey, Zachary C.

CREOL, The College of Optics & Photonics, University of Central Florida

N-PERT BACK JUNCTION SOLAR CELLS: AN OPTION FOR THE NEXT INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY GENERATION?

Transcription:

Thin Nitride Measurement Example GOAL: Get the most information from your data and analyze it properly to make the right decisions! Look at the data in multiple ways to understand your process better. The old saying is Let the Data or parts talk to you. 1

Thin Nitride Measurement Example Definition of Thin Nitride : sub 1000A thickness Film to measure: PECVD Silicon Nitride deposited on Silicon_ A nominal 450A nitride film thickness was deposited on fifteen silicon wafers using a Novellus Thickness and R.I. (refractive index n) was measured on an Optiprobe Model DUV and a Tencor Model tool Measurement data from the two measurement tools was then compared. 2

Thin Nitride Measurement works on the dispersion principle ( refractive index is a function of wavelength) and uses wavelength to determine thickness and refractive index. The Refractive index on is quoted at the 632 nm wavelength! A recipe was optimized to measure Thin Silicon Nitride thickness (400-500A) and refractive index. Summary of Tencor measurement data: Goodness GOF values of 0.994 were obtained. Thickness range: 414-447A (sample dependent) Refractive Index range: 1.97-2.07 ( inter wafer dependent) (632 nm) 3

Optiprobe Thin Nitride Measurement Optiprobe uses ellipsometry and BPR to determine thickness and refractive index. A recipe was optimized to measure Thin Silicon Nitride thickness (400-500A) and refractive index. Summary of Optiprobe measurement data: Thickness range: 442-470A (sample dependent) Refractive Index range: 1.93-1.96 ( inter wafer dependent) 4

Recipe PCVD/Nitride/Thin Nitride - 5PT Validation and comparison to Optiprobe 15 wafer test Thickness Comparsion EXCEL FORMATED DATA Setup Wafer # Center UV 1050 Top Left Bottom Right Center Top Left Bottom Right 1 427 428 425 438 428 456 446 450 458 452 2 427 427 424 437 426 451 453 450 454 451 3 421 423 422 430 422 451 450 450 452 448 4 421 424 420 428 421 446 448 445 447 445 5 419 422 421 428 420 448 450 446 448 448 6 420 420 421 428 423 449 448 448 448 447 7 417 417 420 428 419 444 445 447 446 442 8 419 419 419.9 427 420 445 445 447 446 445 9 418 421 417 428 421 445 446 444 447 444 10 421 426 422 430 423 450 452 447 449 448 11 427 424 423 435 426 453 451 448 452 448 12 429 431 429 441 431 459 452 451 458 450 13 442.2 445 441 446 442 467 469 463 467 465 14 446 446 443 447 442 470 465 466 466 462 15 417 415 414 414 416 449 446 442 446 442 5

Recipe PCVD/Nitride/Thin Nitride - 5PT Validation and comparison to Optiprobe 15 wafer test Refractive Index Comparsion EXCEL FORMATED DATA Setup Wafer # RI CEN RI TOP RI LEFT RI BOT RI RIGHT RI CEN RI TOP RI LEFT RI BOT RI RIGHT 1 2.0543 2.045 2.045 1.9832 2.0402 1.946 1.9583 1.968 1.9471 1.9452 2 2.0622 2.0381 2.0426 2.0252 2.0382 1.9517 1.9418 1.944 1.9418 1.9417 3 2.0651 2.0454 2.0454 2.026 2.0415 1.9465 1.9398 1.9394 1.9381 1.9438 4 2.0687 2.0403 2.0469 2.0254 2.0445 1.955 1.9446 1.9447 1.9447 1.9441 5 2.036 2.0344 2.0483 2.0256 2.0359 1.9484 1.9389 1.9451 1.9424 1.94 6 2.0637 2.0413 2.0446 2.0296 2.0381 1.9487 1.9388 1.9385 1.9407 1.943 7 2.0546 2.0345 2.038 2.0212 2.0403 1.9508 1.9398 1.9394 1.9433 1.9454 8 2.0574 2.0327 2.0358 2.0199 2.032 1.9494 1.9389 1.9412 1.941 1.941 9 2.0523 2.0297 2.0346 2.0205 2.0368 1.9508 1.9398 1.9394 1.9433 1.9454 10 2.038 2.0272 2.032 2.009 2.0309 1.9445 1.9345 1.9372 1.9361 1.938 11 2.0355 2.0229 2.0231 1.9679 2.025 1.9457 1.9372 1.9409 1.939 1.9432 12 2.039 2.0254 2.0079 2.0164 2.0227 1.946 1.9399 1.9384 1.9393 1.9424 13 2.0355 2.0062 2.0047 2.0158 2.016 1.9481 1.9395 1.9413 1.9411 1.9414 14 2.0622 2.0415 2.0337 2.0467 2.0424 1.9488 1.9437 1.9404 1.9432 1.9437 15 1.9458 1.936 1.9411 1.9358 1.9409 6

comparison to Optiprobe 15 wafer test Thickness Comparsion Always look at data graphically first: EXCEL Plot Thickness A 480 470 460 450 440 430 Silicon Nitride Thickness measurements Vs Optiprobe Center UV 1050 Top Left Bottom Right Center Top Left Bottom Right 420 410 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Wafer # What can we say about this data? 7

comparison to Optiprobe 15 wafer test Thickness Comparsion Always look at data graphically first: EXCEL Plot Thickness A 2.08 2.06 2.04 2.02 2 1.98 1.96 1.94 1.92 Silicon Nitride Refractive Index measurements Vs Optiprobe 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Wafer # RI CEN RI TOP RI LEFT RI BOT RI RIGHT RI CEN RI TOP RI LEFT RI BOT RI RIGHT What can we say about this data? 8

Recipe PCVD/Nitride/Thin Nitride - 5PT Validation and comparison to Optiprobe 15 wafer test Thickness Comparsion EXCEL Data Analysis 9

Recipe PCVD/Nitride/Thin Nitride - 5PT Validation and comparison to Optiprobe 15 wafer test Thickness Comparsion EXCEL Descriptive Statistics 10

Recipe PCVD/Nitride/Thin Nitride - 5PT Validation and comparison to Optiprobe 15 wafer test Thickness Comparsion EXCEL Descriptive Statistics Statistic Center UV 1050 Top Left Bottom Right Center Top Left Bottom Right Mean 424.75 425.87 424.13 432.33 425.33 452.20 451.07 449.60 452.27 449.13 Standard Error 2.27 2.33 2.07 2.19 2.00 2.014707825 1.816502832 1.689744979 1.819122412 1.692748305 Median 421 424 422 430 423 450 450 448 449 448 Mode 427 424 422 428 426 451 446 450 446 448 Std Dev 8.81 9.01 8.02 8.48 7.74 7.80 7.04 6.54 7.05 6.56 Sample Variance 77.56 81.12 64.33 71.95 59.95 60.89 49.50 42.83 49.64 42.98 Kurtosis 1.8894897 1.63175426 2.1459123 0.5599923 1.339804911 1.051828528 2.779915121 2.801025593 0.325151756 2.0216176 Skewness 1.5862297 1.42082751 1.5886698-0.011463 1.396416849 1.311750606 1.79513239 1.764434256 1.166492983 1.502582425 Range 29.00 31.00 29.00 33.00 26.00 26.00 24.00 24.00 21.00 23.00 Minimum 417 415 414 414 416 444 445 442 446 442 Maximum 446 446 443 447 442 470 469 466 467 465 Sum 6371.2 6388 6361.9 6485 6380 6783 6766 6744 6784 6737 Count 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 11

Recipe PCVD/Nitride/Thin Nitride - 5PT Validation and comparison to Optiprobe 15 wafer test Thickness Comparsion Statistic UV 1050 SiN Mean 426.48 450.85 Standard Error 1.007742448 0.80173086 Median 424 448 Mode 421 448 Standard Deviation Sample Variance 8.73 6.94 76.17 48.21 Kurtosis 0.049985321 0.983523784 Skewness 0.978771752 1.355572713 Range 33 28 Minimum 414 442 Maximum 447 470 Sum 31986.1 33814 Count 75 75 NORMSINV Normal Probability Plot - Thin Nitride Measurements 3 99.9% 2.5 99.4% 2 97.7% 1.5 93.2% 1 84.1% 0.5 69.2% 0 50% -0.5 30.9% -1 15.9% -1.5 UV 1050 SiN 6.7% -2 2.3% -2.5 0.6% -3 0.1% 410.00 420.00 430.00 440.00 450.00 460.00 470.00 480.00 Thickness A 12

Recipe PCVD/Nitride/Thin Nitride - 5PT Validation and comparison to Optiprobe Optiprobe recipe variance significantly less than recipe STATISTICAL TESTS: F- test and T-test on Thickness data REASON : Unknown UV 1050 SiN Statistic Mean 426.5 450.9 Variance 76.2 48.2 Observations 75 75 df 74 74 F 1.5799 P(F<=f) one-tail 0.0255 F Critical one-tail 1.46945 Variances are significantly different! 2.5% chance of incorrectly rejecting Null that variances are equal t-test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal Variances Statistic UV 1050 SiN Mean 426.5 450.9 Variance 76.2 48.2 Observations 75 75 Hypothesized Mean D 0 df 141 t Stat -18.92593591 P(T<=t) one-tail 7.73673E-41 0% chance of incorrectly rejecting Null that Means are equal t Critical one-tail 1.655732831 P(T<=t) two-tail 1.54735E-40 t Critical two-tail 1.976932253 13

Recipe PCVD/Nitride/Thin Nitride - 5PT Validation and comparison to Optiprobe 15 wafer test Refractive Index Comparsion Statistic UV 1050 SiN Mean 2.03 1.94 Standard Error 0.002059678 0.000610631 Median 2.03585 1.9418 Mode 2.0622 1.9398 Standard Deviation Sample Variance 0.0172 0.0053 2.96959E-04 2.79653E-05 Kurtosis 2.959879417 6.18215699 Skewness -0.999455211 1.864596592 Range 0.1008 0.0335 Minimum 1.9679 1.9345 Maximum 2.0687 1.968 Sum 142.3886 145.7328 Count 70 75 NORMSINV Normal Probability Plot - Thin Nitride 3 99.9% 2.5 99.4% 2 97.7% 1.5 93.2% 1 84.1% 0.5 69.2% 0 50% -0.5 30.9% -1 15.9% -1.5 6.7% -2 RI 2.3% -2.5 RI 0.6% -3 0.1% 1.92 1.94 1.96 1.98 2.00 2.02 2.04 2.06 2.08 Refractive Index 14

Recipe PCVD/Nitride/Thin Nitride - 5PT Validation and comparison to Optiprobe 15 wafers STATISTICAL TESTS: F- test and T-test on Refractive Index data show improved variance with Optiprobbe Recipe as compared to REASON : Unknown F-Test Two- Sample for Variances RI RI Mean 2.034 1.943 Variance 2.970E-04 2.797E-05 Observations 70 75 t-test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal Variances RI RI Mean 2.034 1.943 Variance 2.970E-04 2.797E-05 df 69 74 Observations 70 75 F 10.61886223 P(F<=f) one-tail 2.60228E-20 F Critical one-tail 1.477481248 Variances are significantly different! 0% chance of incorrectly rejecting Null that variances are equal Hypothesized Mean Diffe 0 df 81 t Stat 42.36807647 P(T<=t) one-tail 2.40926E-57 t Critical one-tail 1.663884177 P(T<=t) two-tail 4.81852E-57 t Critical two-tail 1.989687917 15