Outcomes. Kelly Karll-SEMCOG Margaret Barondess - MDOT

Similar documents
Habitat Grant Projects Clinton River Watershed

Municipal Stormwater Management Planning

Regional Watershed Planning. Calumet Summit 2010: A Call to Connect Calumet Conference Center April 27, 2010

CHESAPEAKE BAY COMPREHENSIVE WATER RESOURCES AND RESTORATION PLAN. Habitat GIT Meeting 9 May 2017

COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT REVIEW. Spring Lake Park Schools Westwood Middle School st Avenue NE, Spring Lake Park, MN 55432

TORCH LAKE TOWNSHIP WATER QUALITY ACTION PLAN

A Summary Guide to the. Rifle River WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN. Know Your Watershed Protect Its Resources

Water and Watersheds. Data Maps Action

STREAM RESTORATION PURPOSE, PRACTICE, AND METHODS. By Marcus Rubenstein, CPESC

719 Griswold, Suite 820 Detroit, MI DANVERS POND DAM REMOVAL AND STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT

DAKOTA COUNTY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

The total population of the township is 9,942 (2015 Five-Year American Community Survey [ACS]). The median household income is over $109,000.

Chapter 10 Natural Environment

EFFECT OF UPSTREAM DEVELOPMENT ON THE CLEAR CREEK AREA

Nutrient Management in. A presentation to the West Metro Water Alliance

Hydrologic and Ecologic Impacts from the CERP Indian River Lagoon South Project

Chapter 13: Wildlife and Vegetation

VILLAGE OF BELLAIRE WATER QUALITY ACTION PLAN

Chapter 3 Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences

BIG ROCHE A CRI LAKE CHARACTERISTICS

Wisconsin Wastewater Operators Association. Protecting Our Water Resources: The Future Bill Hafs - NEW Water 10/2014


Environmental Information Worksheet

SECTION 3 NATURAL RESOURCES

APPENDIX H Guidance for Preparing/Reviewing CEQA Initial Studies and Environmental Impact Reports

King County Flood Control District approves grants for flood prevention projects Regional projects to benefit from district funds

All driveways shall have a separate site plan when the application is submitted.

FEMA s Mitigation Support for Resiliency: Innovative Drought and Flood Mitigation Projects

Crow s Foot Conservation Area Feasibility Study

Trails Permitting Process

Doyle Park Reconstruction Project Improving Flood Control Facilities to Meet a TMDL

Chapter 11 Culverts and Bridges

General Plan Update Workshop 6 Agriculture, Conservation, & Open Space February 23, 2005

Holly Swartz and Jason Shirey

Appendix 12. Pollutant Load Estimates and Reductions

RURAL RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE RURAL RESIDENTIAL ALL COMMUNITIES

Department of the Army Permit Application

Project Goals and Scoping

Climate Change Adaptation Strategies for Infrastructure Managers

Polluted Runoff and Land Conservation: What s the Connection?

Information for File # PRH

Acres within Planning Area. Total Acres Burned

Georgia's Nonpoint Source Management Program. Linda MacGregor Watershed Protection Branch Georgia Environmental Protection Division

::no::

Stormwater Management Studies PDS Engineering Services Division ES Policy # 3-01

DESIGN BULLETIN #16/2003 (Revised July 2007) Drainage Guidelines for Highways Under Provincial Jurisdiction in Urban Areas.

NEW CASTLE CONSERVATION DISTRICT. through. (Name of Municipality) PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION DRAINAGE, STORMWATER MANAGEMENT, EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL

CHAPTER 7. San Dieguito River Flooding Adaptation

Council of Governments

Location Drainage Study

Natural Resources and Climate Resiliency in Germantown

6.0 Runoff. 6.1 Introduction. 6.2 Flood Control Design Runoff

Constructed Wetland Pond T-8

PUBLIC NOTICE. Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344) Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS: URBAN STREAM RESTORATION BMP. David Wood Chesapeake Stormwater Network. Lisa Fraley-McNeal Center for Watershed Protection

POLICY FOR NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AREAS

5 th National Conference on Ecosystem Restoration. Alliance for the Great Lakes. Policy & Partnership for Ecosystem Restoration

POND SITING REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION SECTION 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

L-THIA Online and LID in a watershed investigation

C O M P R E H E N S I V E P R O T E C T I O N & R E S T O R AT I O N P L A N. f or th e

Oregon Department of State Lands. Protecting Natural and Fiscal Resources to Support Schools

SW-74 SERENOVA PRESERVE SITES 2, 3, 4, 8 MITIGATION PLAN

Stormwater Local Design Manual For Houston County, Georgia

New Castle County, DE. Floodplain Regulations

Raritan River Basin. How to protect quality & quantity of water resources? Land Protection and Management to Protect Water Resources

EAST TORRANCE SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT. LONG RANGE PLAN July 1, 2009 June 30, 2019

S.O.P. No. HMD

DRAFT GREATER MOOSES TOOTH TWO (GMT2) DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PERMITTEE RESPONSIBLE WETLANDS MITIGATION PLAN NATIONAL PETROLEUM RESERVE-ALASKA

Public Notice. Applicant: City of Dallas Project No.: SWF Date: April 18, Name: Chandler Peter Phone Number:

Local Flood Hazard Mitigation Program. A framework for hazard mitigation in the NYC West of Hudson Water Supply Watersheds

Comfort Lake-Forest Lake Watershed District Six Lakes Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan

UMD Storm Water Program Construction Requirements. Greg Archer, MBA Environmental Compliance Specialist

MODEL Stormwater Local Design Manual. City of Centerville

CRJC Mount Ascutney Local River Subcommittee

The project will be conducted in partnership with the Nez Perce Tribe.

E. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

West Branch LeClerc Creek Watershed Restoration Project Environmental Assessment

Walnut Creek Watershed Management Authority. Project Kick Off March 18, 2015

BOONE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN

Integrating Water Quality and Natural Filters into Maryland s Marine Spatial Planning Efforts

NIAGARA RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN (Phase 1) Buffalo Sewer Authority (BSA), Long Term Control Plan, Buffalo: BSA, 2012

Drain Code Basics: A Little-Known Law with a Large Impact. Michigan Water Environment Association 91 st Annual Conference June 19-22, 2016

Keefer Pasture Drift Fence Project. Challis-Yankee Fork Ranger District Salmon-Challis National Forest

Minnesota River Basin Interagency Study

Chapter 6. Hydrology. 6.0 Introduction. 6.1 Design Rainfall

CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION WORKSHEET: RESOURCE CONSIDERATIONS

3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Solano Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan

ALABAMA S BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES. Protection of Water Quality During Timber Harvesting

Quantifying the Benefits of Stream Restoration

Stream Corridor Protection and Adaptive Management Manual. Prepared for the City of Independence, Missouri

Natural Resource Management of Pipeline Infrastructure

Blanche Park Reservoir Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact

WATER QUALITY WORKSHOP

STREAM AND BUFFER AREA PROTECTION/RESTORATION

Climate Change: Impacts, Monitoring, and Solutions

CORPS REGULATORY PROGRAM

Transcription:

Eco-Logical: I-75 Corridor I-75 Conservation Transportation Action Planning in to Monroe Achieve County: Multiple Stormwater Environmental Considerations Outcomes Kelly Karll-SEMCOG Karll@semcog.org Margaret Barondess - MDOT BarondessM@michigan.gov

Project Overview FHWA SHRP2 Program Address landscape-level environmental priorities during planning 20 year complete reconstruction I-75 Monroe County, Michigan

Monroe County, Michigan Corridor of Highest Significance Critical component of North American freight network International connection Ambassador bridge 40% of all trade with Canada transported through region 2.5 million truck trips per year 21%of all U.S. exports to Canada Opening of Gordie Howe Bridge

20 Year Reconstruction in Five Phases 20 year reconstruction of I-75 in 5 phases enables: Partnerships Data collection Consider environment Design Engineering Construction Align transportation plans with watershed plans Adaptive management Cost savings

Conservation Action Planning Identify Stakeholders & Create a Vision Develop Strategies & Objectives for Implementation I-75 Corridor Conservation Action Plan Select Geographic Scope & Conservation Targets Characterize Stressors Evaluate Viability of Targets & Establish Goals

Identify Stakeholders & Create a Vision Technical Advisory Committee Michigan Department of Transportation Michigan Natural Features Inventory Southeast Michigan Council of Governments Michigan Department of Natural Resources Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Michigan Department of Rural and Agricultural Development Michigan Sea Grant Federal Highway Administration The Nature Conservancy of Michigan Natural Resources Conservation Service US Army Corps of Engineers Monroe County U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Local Implementation Partners Monroe County Road Commission Monroe County Drain Commission Monroe County Conservation District Monroe County Business Development Corporation City of Monroe Detroit River-Lake Erie Cooperative Weed Management Area Green Ribbon Initiative Southeast Michigan Land Conservancy Oak Openings Cooperative Weed Management Area The Nature Conservancy of Ohio Detroit River International Wildlife Refuge IHM Sisters

Vision Develop and implement a collaboratively based, landscape-scale conservation plan, that facilitates rebuilding the I-75 corridor while maximizing conservation and restoration outcomes in the region

Select Geographic Scope Geographic Scope Primary Zone: Defined by historic lake level fluctuation 575 ft. elevation contour US-24/ Historical Native American trail Secondary Zone: HUC-12 subwatersheds western boundary Northern boundary: Lower Huron River Watershed Water Resources were considered from the beginning!

Data collection for planning Landscape Level Functional Wetland Assessment (LLFWA) Water Quality Data Land Use/ Landcover Analysis Conservation Targets

Conservation Action Planning Process Identify Stakeholders & Create a Vision Develop Strategies & Objectives for Implementation I-75 Corridor Conservation Action Plan Characterize Stressors Select Geographic Scope & Conservation Targets Evaluate Viability of Targets & Establish Goals Conservation Targets: Coastal Tributaries - Fair Coastal Wetlands - Fair Migratory Fish - Good Herpetofauna Connectivity - Fair Globally Rare Natural Communities - Poor Aerial Migrants - Fair

Conservation Action Planning Process Identify Stakeholders & Create a Vision Top Stressors & Strategies: Agricultural Drainage and Runoff Develop Strategies & Objectives for Implementation I-75 Corridor Conservation Action Plan Select Geographic Scope & Conservation Targets Urban Development and Runoff Poorly Functioning Road Stream Crossings Invasive Species Characterize Stressors Evaluate Viability of Targets & Establish Goals

Strategies Agricultural Drainage and Runoff Priority Action: Develop a Smart Drain Assessment Project that incentivizes the implementation of Lake plain BMPs USDA Cropland

Strategies Urban Development & Runoff Priority Action: Create a new County initiative that takes an integrative approach to economic development and ecological enhancement Impervious land cover, I-75 at River Raisin

Strategies Invasive Species: Priority Action: Enhance the impact and capacity of existing Cooperative Weed Management Areas (CWMAs) in the I-75 Eco-Logical study area

Strategies Road Stream Crossings Priority Action: Conduct a comprehensive needs assessment for road stream crossings in the I-75 Eco-Logical study area

Implementation

MDOT Implementation Urban & Agricultural Runoff To manage runoff: Widened ditches to install BMPs Swales for water quality volume and conveyance Small infiltration component Check dams

MDOT Implementation Urban & Agricultural Runoff Estimated annual volume and pollutant reductions* Water quality volume: approx 1-inch over drainage area Runoff Volume: 24% reduction Total Phosphorous (TP): 44% reduction Total Suspended Solids (TSS): 58% reduction *Center for Watershed Protection Watershed Treatment Model

MDOT Implementation Wetland Mitigation Coastal wetland restoration Conversion of agricultural land to wetlands Considered opportunities for Hibernacula

MDOT Implementation Invasive Species MDOT joining local CWMA Creating management plan for I-75 corridor Prioritizing control locations Work with partners who seek access to ROW for treatment

MDOT Implementation Native Plants Largest plant mitigation in MDOT history! 16,000 state-listed threatened plants in ROW Relocated 1,550 Sullivant s Milkweed to Sterling State Park Partnership with MDNR & Youth Corps

MDOT Implementation

MDOT Implementation Road Stream Crossings Monroe County has over 2,000 RSXs! Most miles of county drain in Michigan! Survey on culvert passability Established priorities for migratory fish

MDOT Implementation Herpetofauna Survey Evaluated connectivity Established priorities for Herpetofauna and wildlife

MDOT Implementation Improved Culvert Design Removal of Priority Flap Gates Extended Bridge Lengths Wildlife curbs and shelves Wildlife friendly erosion control Water Course Previous size or span length (1952) I-75 over Sandy Creek 30 feet 80 feet I-75 over Stony 130 feet 167 feet Creek I-75 over Miller and Malosh Drain B 6 feet 10 feet I-75 over Webb & Reisdorf Drain 8 feet 10 feet New size or span length (2016)

MDOT Implementation Benefits of improved culvert and bridge design: Reduces scour Reduces flooding Reduces velocity of flow

MDOT Implementation Considering Recreation Otter Creek Water Trail: Planned to reduce bridge clearance, but now increasing to accommodate water trail use! Added a bridge span and smaller beam to increase clearance Bridge Clearance: 8 11 to 6 8 11 to 7 11

Migratory Fish Benefits Improving water quality helps migratory fish Western Banded Killifish Endangered in Ohio No listing in Michigan Orangethroat Darter Species of Concern in Michigan Northern Pike Spawn in low gradient, vegetated, smaller tributaries Benefit from removal of flap gates, increased culvert sizes

MDOT Implementation Public Education NOAA B-WET Grant Year 1: Piloting transportation and environment curriculum Topics: water quality, invasive species, etc. Monroe & Wayne County High School students creating interpretative material for MDOT Welcome Center Year 2: Training more teachers on curriculum

MDOT Implementation Cost Savings Saved $1,000,000 in land acquisition costs through MDNR partnership 50% Transplant Sullivant s milkweed to Sterling State Park 50% from constructing 34 acres of coastal wetlands at Erie State Game Area Partnership opened door for future MDOT/MDNR partnerships on wetland mitigation

Environment & Transportation Reconstruction continues Adaptive management Local implementation of Plan Water Resources Plan for Southeast Michigan Regional policies on stormwater & transportation Roads Action Team on Stormwater Discuss challenges related to managing road runoff Updating SEMCOG Long Range Transportation Plan Environmental Sensitivity Climate Resiliency

How else is SEMCOG Linking Watershed & Transportation Planning?

SEMCOG Long Range Transportation Plan SEMCOG 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRP) Complete early 2019 Guides transportation investments in SE Michigan Improve quality and reliability pr transportation system to: Increase economic prosperity, Achieve fiscal sustainability Increase accessibility, Protect the environment Make communities desirable

Environmental Sensitivity Analysis Updating Environmental Sensitivity Analysis for 2045 LRP Identify potential impact of planned projects on natural resources Natural Resources Rivers, Lakes and Streams Designated Trout Lakes/Streams & Natural Rivers TMDLs Location in watershed T & E species Wetlands Floodplains Parks and Recreation Historic Sites & Heritage Routes Cemeteries

Water Resources Plan for Southeast Michigan DRAFT TRANSPORTATION POLICY #1: Support coordinated efforts to align water, natural resources and transportation priorities. ACTIONS: a. Enhance environmental considerations within the regional transportation planning process. b. Utilize the environmental sensitivity analysis to inform transportation agencies of potential impacts. c. Support and facilitate collaboration between road agencies and local jurisdictions regarding stormwater management opportunities that work towards water quality standards.

Water Resources Plan for Southeast Michigan TRANSPORTATION POLICY #2: Integrate multiple outcomes, including mobility, recreation and habitat, into road stream crossing and culvert designs. ACTIONS: a. Inventory and conduct condition assessments of road stream crossings. b. Categorize road stream crossings and prioritize improvements for multiple transportation modes, water trails, streamflow condition and fish migration. c. Evaluate adaptive capacity of high priority road stream crossings.

Eco-Logical: I-75 Corridor I-75 Conservation Transportation Action Planning in to Monroe Achieve County: Multiple Stormwater Environmental Considerations Outcomes Kelly Karll-SEMCOG Karll@semcog.org Margaret Barondess - MDOT BarondessM@michigan.gov http://www.semcog.org/plans-for-the-region/transportation/environmental