World Journal of Agricultural Sciences 5 (1): 121-125, 2009 ISSN 1817-3047 IDOSI Publications, 2009 Economic Analysis of the Effect of Fertilizer Application on the Performance of White Guinea Yam in Different Ecological Zones of Edo State, Nigeria K.E. Law-Ogbomo and C.O. Emokaro Department of Agriculture, Benson Idahosa University, P.M.B. 1100, Benin City, Nigeria Abstract: Economic analysis of the effect of different rates of NPK 15:15:15 fertilizer application on the yield of yam in three different ecological zones of Edo State was investigated in this study with the aim of determing the optimal fertilizer application rate and the most profitable ecological zone for yam production in Edo State. This study involved the use of Dioscorea rotundata Poir, fertilized with NPK (15:15:15) at rates of 0, 100, 200, 300 and 400 kg/ha using a randomized complete block design with three replicates. The crop was planted early (April) 2004 and 2005 in each of the ecological zones (Derived Savanna (Ubiaja), Forest-Savanna transition (Sabongidda-Ora) and Forest (Evboneka)). Based on the objective function of profit maximization, the optimum returns were recorded at a fertilizer application rate of 300 kg/ha in the Derived Savanna zone with a gross margin of $18,577.38, net returns of $18,225.21 and a benefit-cost ratio of 5.10. In the Forest-Savanna transition zone, optimum rate of fertilizer application was also at 300 kg/ha with a gross margin of $13,794.78 and benefitcost ratio of 3.76. Optimum rate of fertilizer application however dropped to 200 kg/ha in the Forest zone with a gross margin of $13457.39, net returns of $13110.61 and benefit-cost ratio of 3.73. This shows that farmers in the Derived Savanna and Forest-Savanna transition zones stand in a better position to make more profit from yam production through the application of higher rates of fertilizer than farmers in the forest zone. However, soils in the forest zones are naturally fertile and as such require lower fertilizer application rates than in the other zones. Key words: Edo State Optimum application rate Resource-poor farmers Staple food INTRODUCTION increase in annual average yield/ha of 28.4% was recorded between 2001 and 2006 [4]. Since yam Nigeria is the main producer of yam (Dioscorea remains a major staple food in Nigeria based on its cultural species) in the world with about 71% of world output, role [5] and contributing immensely to rural and regional followed by Ghana, Cote d lvoire, Benin and Togo in economies [6], this has called for a concrete effort to that order [1]. The white guinea yam (Dioscorea curb this decline in yield/ha. rotundata Poir) remains the predominant kind of yam The major challenge before researchers therefore, in West Africa as a whole and is grown on a greater is to evolve ways of increasing the yam yield/ha. This hectarage and produced in larger quantities than other would not only ensure the continuous availability of species of yam in the world. Edo State falls within the yam yam for the ever increasing population, it would also producing areas in Nigeria. improve the income earning capacity of the resource-poor Yam production in Nigeria has more than tripled farmers responsible for producing the bulk of the yam in over the past 40 years from 6.7 million tonnes per annum Nigeria. in 1961 to 27 million tonnes per annum in 2001 [2]. This The average yam producer is highly rational in the increase is however, attributed to larger hectares of economic sense, ever seeking ways of maximizing the land planted to yam than to increased productivity as returns from his lean resources which are not only scarce is the case in other climes. The decline in average yield but have alternative uses. This study was thus designed per heater in Nigeria has been rather drastic, dropping to analyse the effect of the application of different rates from 14.9% in 1986 1990 to -2.5% in 1999 [2,3]. However, of NPK 15:15:15 fertilizer on the performance of Dioscorea Corresponding Author: Dr. K.E. Law-Ogbomo, Department of Agriculture, Benson Idahosa University, P.M.B. 1100, Benin City, Nigeria 121
rotundata pior in Derived savanna, Forest-Savanna Kennelley [7]. Data obtained are presented in Table 2. transition and Forest ecological zones of Edo State. The Although the sites were cultivated in the last two years, main objective was to determine the optimum NPK there was no evidence of fertilizer use. 15:15:15 fertilizer application rate in each of the three A randomized complete block design with three ecological zones, based on the objective function of blocks was utilized at each year for the different location. profit maximization. This would not only serve as a Each block comprised five plots, each of which measured guide to local farmers, but also provide empirical evidence 7x 6 m. The treatment consisted of five fertilizer levels viz. for other stakeholders and would-be investors in yam 0, 100, 200, 300 and 400kg/ha of NPK 15:15:15 compound production and related ventures. fertilizer. Planting was done with D. rotundata cv MATERIALS AND METHODS Obiaoturugo yam sett of 250 g size buried in the soil at a spacing of 100cm within row to given a population of The study was conducted in 2004 and 2005 10000 plants per hectare (ppp). Planting was done on in three ecological zones of Edo State; Evboneka th 24 of April in each of the two years. The plots were (forest), Ubiaja (derived savanna) and Sabongidda- weeded when necessary. Basal application of five levels Ora (forest-savanna transition). These zones lie (0, 100, 200, 300 and 400 kg/ha) of NPK fertilizer at six between longitude 5 04' and 6 45'E and between weeks after planting (WAP). Staking was done by using latitude 5 45' and 7 30'N. Weather data during the trial one stake per stand. period were obtained from the Nigerian Institute for The yams were harvested at 33 WAP when all the Oil Palm Research (NIFOR), Benin City. The data are leaves (leaf senescence) and vines had withered and presented in Table 1. there was no more vegetative growth. Twelve yam stands Prior to land preparation and after harvest, composite in each plot were harvested and data collected on tuber samples of top soil (0 30 cm depth) were collected from yield per hectare. each of the three sites with an auger. The samples were Analysis of variance was carried out on each of the air-dried for two weeks, sieved and routinely analyzed for data collected after estimating the mean for two years their soil physical and chemical properties, using standard with GENSTAT programme, version 8.1 and means were laboratory procedures described by Mylavarapu and compared using Least Significant Different (LSD). Table 1: Climatic data at Evboneka (Forest zone) 2004 2005 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Relative humidity (%) Temperature (%) Relative humidity (%) Solar Temperature (%) Rainfall Sunshine ---------------------------- Solar ---------------------- Rainfall Sunshine --------------------------- Radiation ------------------- Month (mm) (hours) 900H 1500H radiation Max. Min. (mm) (hours) 900H 1500H Max. Min. January 35.20 224.80 78.40 50.70 365.10 33.30 21.60 0.00 NA 61.70 45.00 NA 33.30 19.60 February 13.50 101.70 72.80 50.40 406.80 35.60 22.50 15.70 NA 79.80 52.40 NA 35.10 24.10 March 55.30 33.00 72.60 50.60 392.20 30.60 24.40 167.20 NA 81.70 65.20 NA 33.70 22.00 April 104.40 109.20 83.30 69.00 369.90 33.50 22.60 114.40 NA 81.80 67.10 NA 34.60 22.00 May 323.40 139.50 84.80 67.00 384.90 31.50 23.00 132.90 NA 83.40 68.20 NA 31.90 20.90 June 355.70 126.60 89.80 65.20 359.60 30.70 22.80 292.76 NA 85.90 75.50 NA 31.60 2..8 July 214.30 83.40 87.50 79.30 294.30 30.70 21.60 409.80 NA 86.40 81.00 NA 27.40 19.90 August 298.60 41.00 90.00 85.20 294.80 29.80 21.80 80.90 NA 89.00 68.00 NA 27.70 20.90 September 251.10 67.10 86.10 75.10 324.60 30.40 21.50 177.30 NA 86.30 73.80 NA 29.40 21.60 October 247.00 111.50 82.90 70.30 379.30 31.30 22.10 167.20 NA 84.80 69.10 NA 32.30 19.60 November 28.30 162.10 82.50 64.80 386.00 32.40 22.70 33.90 NA 80.10 56.40 NA 32.00 20.90 December 0.00 154.70 82.90 56.30 396.10 33.70 22.80 0.00 NA 83.40 61.50 NA 32.90 21.10 Total 1928.80 1493.80 991.60 783.90 4353.60 383.50 270.00 1595.00 NA 984.00 794.00 NA 381.90 253.40 Mean 160.70 124.50 82.60 65.30 362.80 32.00 22.5 132.90 NA 82.03 66.20 NA 31.80 21.10 Source: Documentation and Information Department, Nigerian Institute for Oil Palm Research, NIFOR. 122
Table 2: Soil physical and chemical properties of the experimental sites before cropping with yams in 2004 and 2005 Experimental sites --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Soil properties Evboneka 1 Evboneka 11 Sabongidda-Ora 1 Sabongidda-Ora 11 Ubiaja 1 Ubiaja 11 ph (H2O) 5.00 4.80 5.70 6.30 6.32 6.36 Organic carbon (%) 0.76 0.79 1.62 1.66 1.90 1.54 Total nitrogen (%) 0.09 0.07 0.18 0.18 1.20 0.15 Available phosphorus (mg/kg) 4.67 3.85 7.30 1.10 6.50 2.80 Calcium (cmol/kg) 0.80 0.70 7.80 5.75 0.45 4.93 Magnesium (cmol/kg) 0.60 0.60 0.60 1.75 0.34 1.31 Potassium (cmol/kg) 0.15 0.15 0.40 0.27 0.14 0.23 Clay (%) 25.00 31.00 11.00 22.60 10.90 17.60 Silt (%) 17.00 22.00 11.00 23.40 8.60 12.40 Sand (%) 58.00 47.00 78.00 54.40 80.50 70.40 Textural class Sandy loam Sandy Loam Loam sand Sandy loam Loam sand Sandy loam Keys: Evboneka I - NPK fertilizer trial site 2004 (Forest zone) Evboneka II - NPK fertilizer trial site 2005 (Forest zone) Sabongidda-Ora - NPK fertilizer trial site 2004 (Forest-savanna transition zone) Sabongidda-Ora - NPK fertilizer trial site 2005 (Forest-savanna transition zone) Ubiaja 1 - NPK fertilizer trial site 2004 (Derived savanna) Ubiaja 11 - NPK fertilizer Trial site 2005 (Derived savanna) In order to determine the profitability of tuber yield the derived savanna zone exhibited the best response produced from the different fertilizer rate, the following to NPK fertilizer application in Edo State with respect to parameters were estimated: the yield of yam. In terms of cost, the highest total variable cost of (I) GM = TR TVC [8] $3276.52 was incurred under the fertilizer application Where GM = Gross margin (US $/ha) rate of 400 kg/ha in all the zones (Table 3) with cost of TR = Total revenue (US $/ha) planting material (yam sett) accounting for about 66% TVC = Total variable cost (US $/ha) of the total variable cost, while labour cost accounted (iii) Return/$ invested = GM/Total fixed cost [8] for about 25%. This compares favourably with findings (ii) NR = GM TFC of Kalu and Erhabor [6], who reported that the bulk of Where NR = Net return (US $/ha) the total variable cost was spent on planting materials TFC = Total fixed cost (US $/ha) and labour. This is further corroborated by Wilson [9] (iii) TCP = TVC + TFC and IITA [10], who listed the cost of labour and materials Where TCP = Total cost of production among the major constraints of yam production. (iv)benefit-cost ratio = NR / TCP [8]. The total fixed cost did not vary much across the zones, ranging from $334.26 at the unfertilized plots to RESULTS AND DISCUSSION $357.56 under 400 kg NPK/ha N fertilizer application rates (Table 3). This reflected on the economic parameters of The highest yield of 24.07 t/ha was recorded in the gross margin, net returns and benefit-cost ratio with derived savanna zone at the NPK 15:15:15 application the highest of $18577.38, $18225.21 and 5.10, respectively rate of 300 kg/ha, followed by a yield of 20.23 t/ha at coming from the derived savanna zone at the N fertilizer 200 kg/ha application rate (Table 3). The fertilizer application rate of 300 kg/ha (Table 3). This was followed application rate of 300 kg/ha in the forest-savanna by $14422.60, $14075.83 and 4.0, respectively at the N transition zone gave the next highest yield of 19.16 t/ha, fertilizer application rate of 300 kg/ha as the optimum followed by the application N rate of 200 kg/ha which fertilizer application rate at the derived savanna zone of gave a yield of 19.12 kg/ha in the forest zone (Table 3). Edo State with respect to profit maximization. The respective yield followed the same sequence at an In the forest-savanna transition zone, the optimum output price of $869.57 per tonne. This suggests that fertilizer application rate was also 300 kg/ha with gross 123
Table 3: Profitability analysis of the effect of NPK 15:15:15 fertilizer application on the performance of D. rotundata cv "Obiaoturugo" Fertilizer rate (kg/ha) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Site Item 0 100 200 300 400 Evboneka Output (t/ha) 10.36 17.72 19.12 19.16 11.55 (Forest) Revenue ($869.57/t) 90088.70 15408.70 16626.09 16660.90 10043.48 Total variable cost ($) 3060.87 3114.78 3168.96 3222.61 3276.52 Gross margin ($) 5947.83 12295.65 13457.39 13438.26 6723.48 Return/$invested 1.94 3.95 4.25 4.97 2.03 Net return ($) 5613.57 11954.26 13110.61 12999.13 6365.91 Benefit-cost ratio 1.65 3.46 3.73 3.64 1.75 Sabongidda-Ora Output (t/ha) 10.10 14.63 16.20 19.57 13.00 (Forest-Savanna Revenue ($869.57/t) 8782.61 12721.74 14086.96 16660.87 10043.48 transition) Total variable cost ($) 3060.87 3114.78 3168.96 3222.61 3276.52 Gross margin ($) 5721.74 9606.96 10918.26 13794.78 8027.83 Return/$invested 1.87 3.08 3.45 4.28 2.45 Net return ($) 5387.47 9266.16 10571.48 13442.60 7671.13 Benefit-cost ratio 1.59 2.68 3.01 3.76 2.11 Ubiaja Output (t/ha) 11.80 18.57 20.23 24.07 17.02 (Derived Savanna) Revenue ($869.57/t) 10260.87 16147.83 17591.30 20930.43 14800.00 Total variable cost ($) 3060.87 3114.78 3168.96 3222.61 3276.52 Gross margin ($) 7200.00 13033.04 14422.60 18577.38 11523.48 Return/$invested 2.35 4.18 4.55 5.76 3.82 Net return ($) 6865.74 12691.65 14075.53 18225.21 11165.91 Benefit-cost ratio 2.02 3.67 4.00 5.10 3.07 margin, net returns and benefit-cost ratio of 13794.78, also showed that the bulk of the total variable cost was 13442.60 and $3.76, respectively (Table 3). However, expensed on planting materials and labour. Effort should the optimum fertilizer application rate at the zone was be geared towards encouraging local farmers to maintain lower (200 kg/ha) with a gross margin, net margin and these optimum N application rates so as to remain at the benefit-cost ratio of 13457.39, 13110.61 and $3.73, economically relevant stage of production. This study respectively (Table 3). The implication of this is that, should also be geared towards the development of though the benefit-cost ratio is positive at all the levels cheaper planting materials and labour saving devices that of fertilizer application in all the zones, the best returns are cost effective. would be achieved at an application rate of 300 kg/ha for both derived savanna and forest-savanna transition REFERENCES zones and 200 kg/ha for the forest zone. The local farmers in Edo State, who are assumed to be rational, must 1. FAO, 2002. Food and Agricultural Organisation maintain these levels for optimum returns. Yearbook Volume 56. 2. CBN, 2002. Statistical Bulletin. Central Bank of Nigeria CONCLUSION (CBN) publication, Abuja, pp: 252-260. 3. Amegbeto, K.N., V. Manyoung, R. Asiedu and It has been shown in this study that the optimum O. Coulibaly, 2002. Technology adoption within rate of NPK 15:15:15 N fertilizer application is 300 kg/ha for yam-based production system: Prospects for the derived savanna and forest-savanna transition zones diffusion of improved varieties in Nigeria. IITA and 200 N kg/ha for forest zone in Edo State. This study Project, pp: 6-11. 124
4. FAO, 2007. Food and Agriculture Organisation 7. Mylavarapu, R.S. and D.E. Kennelley, 2002. Dasebase. FAOSTAT website, http//faostat.fao UF/IFAS Extension Soil Testing Laboratory (ESTL): 5. Nweke, F.I., E.C. Okorji, J.E. Njoku and D.J. King, Analytical procedures and training manual. Institute 1992. Elasticities of demand for major food items of food and Agricultural Sciences, University of in a root and tuber-based food system; emphasis Florida, Gainesville, U.S.A, pp: 28. on yam and cassava in Southeastern, Nigeria. 8. Erhabor, P.O., 2005. Economic analysis of proven Resource and Crop Management Division, IITA, technologies by ADPs to farmers from 1986 1995. Ibadan, pp: 21. Technical Report. Project Coordinating Unit, 334. 6. Kalu, B.R. and P.O. Erhabor, 1992. Production 9. Wilson, J.E., 1982. Progress in the Breeding of Yam, and economic evaluation of white guinea yam Dioscorea sp. in yams Igname Miege, J. and Lyonga, minisett under ridge and bed production system in a S.N. (Eds.). Oxford: Clarendon press, pp: 17-22. tropical guinea savanna location, Nigeria. Tropical 10. IITA 2001. Annual Report of the International Agriculture (Trinidad), 61: 78-81. Institute for Tropical Agriculture. Ibadan, Nigeria. 125