ACCOUNTING FOR IMPERFECTIONS AS PER EUROCODE 2 AND EUROCODE 3 IN ETABS 2016 AND SAP2000 V19

Similar documents
ACCOUNTING FOR SECOND ORDER EFFECTS DUE TO GEOMETRIC NONLINEARITY AS PER EUROCODE 2 AND EUROCODE 3 IN ETABS 2016 AND SAP2000 V19

ETABS 2016 Tutorial: Trusses

Design check of BRBF system according to Eurocode 8 Use of pushover analysis

Shear Wall Design Manual

DS/EN DK NA:2013

NONLINEAR STATIC ANALYSIS OF R.C.C. FRAMES (Software Implementation ETABS 9.7)

RELIABILITY OF SEISMIC LINKS IN ECCENTRICALLY BRACED STEEL FRAMES

22. DESIGN OF STEEL BRACED FRAMES Eccentrically Braced Steel Frames

Design Example 2 Reinforced Concrete Wall with Coupling Beams

Evaluation of Earthquake Risk Buildings with Masonry Infill Panels

MULTI-STOREY BUILDINGS - II

Advance Design 2016 SP1

Advance Design Bracing members design according to Eurocode 3

Index terms Diagrid, Nonlinear Static Analysis, SAP 2000.

Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 2017

Buckling of Columns I

Composite Beam Design Manual AISC

STUDY ON TALL BUILDING STRUCTURE ANALYSIS

STABILITY ANALYSIS OF THE SEISMIC RESPONSE OF HIGH RISE STEEL BUILDINGS INCLUDING P-DELTA EFFECTS

COMPARATIVE REPORT CYPECAD VS. ETABS

Seismic Analysis and Design of Vertically Irregular RC Building Frames

Behaviour and design of innovative hybrid coupled shear walls for steel buildings in seismic areas

ctbuh.org/papers Stability of Diagrid Structures Title: Ahmad Rahimian, WSP Parsons Brinckerhoff Structural Engineering Structure

Structural Design of Pergola with Airfoil Louvers

Nonlinear Pushover Analysis of Steel Frame Structure Dahal, Purna P., Graduate Student Southern Illinois University, Carbondale

Design of buildings using EC8

Ultimate and serviceability limit state optimization of cold-formed steel hat-shaped beams

OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CENTRAL OFFICE, 1980 W. BROAD ST., COLUMBUS, OHIO

Fuzzy Analysis of the Serviceability Limit State of a Truss Cantilever

Load Bearing and Deformation Capacity of Fire Resistance Steel Tubular Columns at Elevated Temperature

ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURES WITH RESPECT TO LINEAR STATIC ANALYSIS USING P-DELTA EFFECT Rupali Bondre, Sandeep gaikwad

Title. Author(s)ARDESHIR DEYLAMI; MOSTAFA FEGHHI. Issue Date Doc URL. Type. Note. File Information IRREGULARITY IN HEIGHT

Effect of lateral support of compression flange to stability of beam-columns

Jerome J. Connor Susan Faraji. Fundamentals of Structural. Engineering. ^ Springer

5.4 Analysis for Torsion

PUSHOVER ANALYSIS OF A 19 STORY CONCRETE SHEAR WALL BUILDING

Lateral Loads Manual

Static and Dynamic Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Framed Building: A Comparative Study

Analysis of Various Steel Bracing Systems using Steel Sections for High Rise Structures

Compression Members. Columns I. Summary: Objectives: References: Contents:

BASE SHEAR REDISTRIBUTION BETWEEN THE R/C DUAL SYSTEM STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS

PEER Tall Building Seismic Design Guidelines

Council on Tall Buildings

Direct Analysis Method in Robot Structural Analysis Professional

Comparative Study of Elastic Analysis and P-Δ Effect in Elevated Water Tank for Seismic Loads

Analysis of Shear Wall Transfer Beam Structure LEI KA HOU

4.2 Tier 2 Analysis General Analysis Procedures for LSP & LDP

Steel Connection Design

3.5 Tier 1 Analysis Overview Seismic Shear Forces

Stability Analysis of Rigid Steel Frames With and Without Bracing Systems under the Effect of Seismic and Wind Loads

PUSHOVER ANALYSIS FOR THE RC STRUCTURES WITH DIFFERENT ECCENTRICITY

Chapter 13: Retaining Walls

EVALUATION OF SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF MULTISTORY BUILDINGS DESIGNED ACCORDING TO EGYPTIAN CODE

[Jagadeesh B N* et al., 5(9): September, 2016] ISSN: IC Value: 3.00 Impact Factor: 4.116

Module Definition Form (MDF)

Study of P-Delta Effect on Tall Steel Structure

Page 53 pren (Final draft)

SEISMIC EVALUATION OF HIGH RISE STEEL STRUCTURES WITH AND WITHOUT BRACING

SLENDER STEEL ARCHES WITH PARTICULAR HANGER ARRANGEMENT FOR MODERNISING CONCRETE BRIDGES (ARCH 04)

Composite Column Design Manual

Learning Module Number 7 Second- order (P- Δ and P- δ) Effects

STUDY ON STRUCTURAL BEHAVIOUR OF HEXAGRID STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS IN MULTI STOREY BUILDINGS

Thesis Proposal. Nasser Marafi. Center & Facility Service Building. St. Joseph Hospital of Orange Patient Care. Proposal

Eurocode 6 Design of masonry structures

UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON WESTERN INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FZE. BEng (HONS) CIVIL ENGINEERING SEMESTER ONE EXAMINATION 2015/2016

ADAPT-PT 2010 Tutorial Idealization of Design Strip in ADAPT-PT

DESIGN AND COMPARISON OF A RESIDENTIAL BUILDING (G+10) FOR SEISMIC FORCES USING THE CODES: IS1893, EURO CODE8, ASCE 7-10 AND BRITISH CODE

User Guide. for Eurocode Modules. Design+ Interface General Column Design Combined Wall Design Strip Foundation Design Design Parameters

Design of large scale wind turbine towers in seismic areas

Experimental Tests and Numerical Modelling on Slender Steel Columns at High Temperatures

Seismic Fragility of Concrete Bridges with Deck Monolithically Connected to the Piers or Supported on Elastomeric Bearings

INTERACTION OF TORSION AND P-DELTA EFFECTS IN TALL BUILDINGS

Numerical modelling of steel beam-columns in case of fire comparisons with Eurocode 3

Contents. Tables. Notation xii Latin upper case letters Latin lower case letters Greek upper case letters Greek lower case letters. Foreword.

Bijan Khaleghi, Ph, D. P.E., S.E.

Seismic Assessment of an RC Building Using Pushover Analysis

SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF SIX STOREYED RC FRAMED BUILDING WITH BRACING SYSTEMS

Structural Analysis A: Statically Determinate Structures

> 0. 1 f, they are treated as beam-columns.

THE BEHAVIOR OF ECCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES WITH SHORT LINKS

ADAPT-PTRC 2016 Getting Started Tutorial ADAPT-PT mode

RFS-CT HISTWIN High-Strength Steel Tower for Wind Turbine

Application of Pushover Analysis for Evaluating Seismic Performance of RC Building

Chapter. Masonry Design

Nonlinear Analysis And Performance Assessment for 3D Structure

Performance based Displacement Limits for Reinforced Concrete Columns under Flexure

Project Title. Comparative Study of Shear wall in multistoried

Earthquakes Analysis of High Rise Buildings with Shear Walls at the Center Core and Center of Each Side of the External Perimeter with Opening

Analytical Study on Seismic Performance of Hybrid (DUAL) Structural System Subjected To Earthquake

Seismic Analysis of Steel Frames with Different Bracings using ETSBS Software.

A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE REQUIREMENTS OF PRESENT AND FORMER ROMANIAN SEISMIC DESIGN CODES, BASED ON THE REQUIRED STRUCTURAL OVERSTRENGTH

Available at ISSN

Spatial Framework Program for Civil Engineering...

Tech Tips SidePlate Connections FAQ 09/30/2017

SEISMIC BEHAVIOUR OF RC BUILDING RESTING ON PLAIN AND SLOPING GROUND WITH BRACINGS AND SHEAR WALL

Seismic Analysis & Design of 10 Story RC Building

Shear Wall Design Manual CSA A

EN REINFORCED MASONRY DESIGN EXAMPLE 1 (NOTE: THIS USES THE UK NATIONAL ANNEX NDP VALUES)

Pushover analysis of RC frame structure using ETABS 9.7.1

Transcription:

ACCOUNTING FOR IMPERFECTIONS AS PER EUROCODE 2 AND EUROCODE 3 IN ETABS 2016 AND SAP2000 V19 I. Overview Eurocode 2 and Eurocode 3 requires frame and member imperfections (global and local) be accounted for either in the analysis stage or in the design stage. Accounting global and local imperfections in the analysis stage of a numerical model can be done by either: - Modeling the global and/or local imperfections explicitly in the model - Applying horizontal UDL along vertical member length for local imperfection (applicable for EC3 only) - Applying Equivalent Horizontal Force (EHF) at each stories for global imperfection. - Using the buckling mode shapes as initial geometry (applicable for EC3 only) Accounting global and/or local imperfections in the analysis stage by modelling the frames and members unstraight or crooked, although can be done, will be impractical and time consuming. Similarly, applying horizontal UDL on vertical members to account for local imperfection is only practical when checking the effect on a single vertical element. These methods will not be discussed here. In EC2 and EC3, global imperfections can be accounted for in the design stage as ECC (eccentricity) on isolated vertical members. Local imperfections in EC3 are accounted for in the design stage by using the relevant buckling shape factors in member buckling check. This technical note discusses on how to account for imperfections in ETABS 2016 and SAP2000 v19 models. II. Accounting for Global Imperfection in Design Stage as ECC The most convenient way to account for global imperfections is to consider it as an ECC in design of isolated vertical members. This method is available in ETABS 2016 and SAP200o v19 for EC2 design, but not currently available for EC3 design. This will be included for EC3 design in the future software release/updates. The inclination value will be calculated as: θ i = θ 0 α h α m where θ 0 = is the basic value given as 0.005 (= 1/200) ; [Please check your NDP value] α m = 1 α h = 2 l ; 2/3 α h 1 Otte Technical Note No.: TN-S01 Rev. 0 1

l = actual length of the vertical member The eccentricity due to imperfection will be calculated as: e i = θ i l 0/2 The eccentricity e i shall be equal or bigger than code specified minimum eccentricity: e min = h/30 20 mm The resulting geometric imperfection moments, M i2 and M i3, will be added to analysis first order moments in a single direction at a time: M i2 = e i2 N Ed M i3 = e i3 N Ed Setting Concrete Frame Design Preference to account for global imperfection in ETABS 2016 and SAP2000 v19 for EC2 column design: Go to Design>Concrete Frame Design>View/Revise Preferences and specify Theta0 value. Otte Technical Note No.: TN-S01 Rev. 0 2

Setting Shear Wall Design Preference to account for global imperfection in ETABS 2016 and SAP2000 v19 for EC2 wall design: Go to Design>Shear Wall Design>View/Revise Preferences and specify Theta0 value. III. Accounting for Global Imperfection in Analysis Stage as EHF Global imperfection can be accounted for in analysis stage as EHF defined as notional loads in ETABS 2016 and SAP2000 v19. This is done by defining notional load patterns for all dead load and live load pattern in both x and y directions. Click on Define>Load Patterns Add a new notional load pattern for each dead and live load patterns for x and y directions. Specify the Load Ratio as the value of calculated θ i, or conservatively use 0.0005. Otte Technical Note No.: TN-S01 Rev. 0 3

The value of Load Ratio to be used in defining the EHFs is equal to inclination θ i from equation below: θ i = θ 0 α h α m where θ 0 = is the basic value given as 0.005 (= 1/200) ; [Please check your NDP value] α m = number of vertical members contributing to the horizontal force α h = 2 l ; 2/3 α h 1 l = height of building Otte Technical Note No.: TN-S01 Rev. 0 4

If designing for EC2, set the Theta0 value in the concrete frame and shear wall design preferences with very small value (i.e., 0.000001). This is done so that the effect of global imperfection will not be accounted twice. This step is not required if designing for EC3. Otte Technical Note No.: TN-S01 Rev. 0 5

The design load combinations should also be updated to include these effects. Click on Define>Load Combinations and modify/create design load combinations to include the generated EHF load cases with the appropriate load factors. Use positive and negative values for opposing directions. Otte Technical Note No.: TN-S01 Rev. 0 6

IV. Accounting for Local Imperfection in Design Stage ETABS 2016 and SAP2000 v19 automatically accounted for local imperfection effect by the relevant buckling and imperfection factors as per EC3 in the design for buckling resistance of vertical steel members. This is done automatically and no additional input is required. Otte Technical Note No.: TN-S01 Rev. 0 7

Otte Technical Note No.: TN-S01 Rev. 0 8

V. Using Buckling Mode Shape as Modified Geometry to Account for Global and/or Local Imperfection in Analysis Stage As per EC3, the assumed shape of global imperfections and local imperfections may also be derived from the elastic buckling mode of a structure in the plane of buckling considered. The deformed geometry of any Buckling Analysis load case can then be used as modified geometry of the structure to account for global and/or local imperfections. Otte Technical Note No.: TN-S01 Rev. 0 9

This method is useful for modelling non-building structures (e.g., domes, etc.) wherein modelling global imperfection as EHF may not be applicable anymore. This method requires engineering judgment and experience in selecting which buckling load case and mode to use. This may also mean that a single structure will have to be saved in multiple models with different deformed geometry for analysis and design. After running the buckling analysis load cases, click on Analyze>Modify Undeformed Geometry Select the buckling load case and one of its mode shape to be used to modify the initial geometry. Otte Technical Note No.: TN-S01 Rev. 0 10