EPA s 33/50 Program Company Profile

Similar documents
Handbook AS-552 August 1996

Acceptance standards and charging rates for

The Ericsson lists of banned and restricted substances

TITLE V COMMERCIAL PRINTING FACILITIES What is Title V?

15A NCAC 02B.0269 is amended with changes without notice pursuant to G.S. 150B-21.5(a)(3) as follows: SECTION.0600 RIPARIAN BUFFER RESTORATION FUND

RULE Federally Enforceable Limits on Potential to Emit - Adopted 1/25/96

POTENTIAL TO EMIT LIMITATIONS FOR PART 70 SOURCES. (Adopted 6/15/1995, revised 1/18/2001 and 1/20/2011)

REVIEW OF THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT RELEASE INVENTORY (1995)

Continental Aluminum Exposure Investigation Executive Summary

Parker Hannifin Corporation Environmental, Health, and Safety Report 2000

Key Points on Point of Generation. Julie Marks, PE (573)

List of Toxic Substances at the Facility for Which Plans Have Been Prepared

Exact Scientific Services, Inc. Ferndale, WA

Environmentally Conscious Closed-Loop Aqueous and Semi-Aqueous Cleaning Systems for Defluxing and Degreasing

Fact Sheet OFFICE OF WASTE REDUCTION SERVICES

SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005

Midwest Analytical Services, Inc. "Where industry comes for answers." PRICE LIST 2009

Drinking Water Quality and Compliance SaskWater Wakaw-Humboldt Potable Water Supply System and Treatment Plant 2016 Notification to Consumers

06. Electroplating Industry

Equipment That Needs A Permit From The SCAQMD

SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005

Inorganic Chemicals (IOCs)

Reducing the Use of Carcinogens in Workplaces. Ken Geiser, PhD Lowell Center for Sustainable Production University of Massachusetts Lowell

2013 Water Analysis Report

Introduction: What is the TRI National Analysis? Disposal or Other Releases of TRI Chemicals Management of TRI Chemicals...

Lockheed Martin Environmental Technology Initiatives. Stephen P. Evanoff, P.E., DEE, R.E.M Lockheed Martin Corporate Environment, Safety, and Health

Ground Water Screening Level (GWSL) 1,2 ug/l TCR = 1.0E-05/HQ =0.2. Sub-slab and Exterior Soil Gas Screening Level (SGSL) 1,2.

Hewlett-Packard Company All-In-One Division West Bernardo Drive. San Diego, CA

Produced by E.L. Electrical Material Suppliers Association. The material is based on NUTEK s project "Advice for Purchasers"

Bioremediation Product Series

Part 1: Property Ownership, Property Information and Owner s Certifications

Environmental declaration for light fittings, excluding sources of light Compagny : Contact : person : Mr Alain NOUMA E-number : Phone:

H&H Job No. DS0-05. April 29, South Tryon Street Suite 100 Charlotte, NC

Environmental declaration for light fittings, excluding sources of light Compagny : Contact : person : Mr Alain NOUMA E-number : Phone:

Waterfront Substation

Technical Design by AMCEC, USA. Solvent Recovery Solutions For Profitability with Compliance

Chlorinated and Brominated Solvents Exposure Study. Gary Hatcher, American Electric Power

Waste Discharge Permit Application. for. Commercial, Industrial and Institutional Discharges

January 17, 2017 Page 1 of 1. Desert Springs Bottled Water PO BOX 273 Echo, OR 97826

Dr. Sébastien Gallet Speaker Marcel Morin (Akzo Nobel) November 24 th 2017

Residuals/Impurities. Are All Substances Above the Threshold Indicated: Nested Materials Method Basic Method

WATER QUALITY REPORT

Environmental declaration for light fittings, excluding sources of light Compagny : Contact : person : Mr Alain NOUMA E-number : Phone:

HAZARDOUS AND SOLID WASTE ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS

GERBER PURE Water. Primary Inorganics Antimony

Preferred. Steel, Epoxy Powder Coated. Satisfactory. Limited

Estimating Chemical Releases From Monofilament Fiber Manufacturing

NIOSH Pocket Guide Performance Measure (To be used with 2005 NIOSH Pocket Guide, September 2005)

BOTTLED WATER QUALITY REPORT. FIJI WATER COMPANY W. Olympic Boulevard Los Angeles, CA INTRODUCTION OUR SOURCE FOR OUR WATER

ADDENDUM #004. Laboratory Analysis on Water Treatment Plants, Wastewater Treatment Plants, and Groundwater Wells

Anritsu Company Global Green Procurement Guidelines

HAZARDOUS WASTE COMPLIANCE MANUAL FOR GENERATORS OF

2015 Annual Drinking Water Report Martinsburg Municipal Authority

November Nanticoke Refinery Reduction plan summary (OR 455/09)

Hewlett-Packard Company Personal Printing/Personal LaserJet Solutions Chinden Boulevard Boise, Idaho USA

Pollution Prevention Planning Notices: Design Features

GREEN PROCUREMENT GUIDELINES

Toxic Releases from Power Plants

Source Reduction of Chlorinated Solvents in Electronics Industry

Toxic Substance Reduction Plan Summary. Phase I Chemicals

Draeger-Tubes and accuro Pump

Executive Summary. 2. Property Investigations Groundwater Sampling Soil Sampling Soil Vapor Sampling 5

The Regional Municipality of Durham. Port Perry Drinking Water System 2017 Annual Report

A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH TO POWER PLANT TOXIC RELEASE INVENTORIES

ADEQ NON-CRITERIA POLLUTANT CONTROL STRATEGY Revised April 2015

Industrial and Hazardous Waste: Rules and Regulations for Small-Quantity Generators

Drinking-Water Systems Regulation O. Reg. 170/03

Welcome to ChaseWarner Waste Management

Preventing Pollution in Flexographic Printing

Peace Independence Democracy Unity Prosperity. Decree on The Control of the Import, Export and Use of Ozone Depleting Substances

Air Pollution in NJ: Past,Present and thoughts about the Future

Product Certification Criteria for. Products Using Recycled Materials

HK Pretreatment Plant Reference Guide

BURLINGTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOLID WASTE WASTE CLASSIFICATION REQUEST FORM AND INSTRUCTIONS

FORM 26R CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF RESIDUAL WASTE ANNUAL REPORT BY THE GENERATOR INSTRUCTIONS GENERAL INFORMATION

1.1 Title: Hazardous Waste Produced on Naval Vessels; control U.S.C. 5103, Federal Hazardous Materials Transportation Act

GROUNDWATER INFORMATION SHEET. Tetrachloroethylene (PCE)

WeatherBoards Fiber Cement

EPA s New, Final Work Plan Risk Assessments and What They Mean to You

Toxic Release Inventory Inspections. Chris Rascher (617) U.S. EPA, Region 1, Office of Environmental Stewardship

Dynamic Pollution Prevention Proaram

NEW JERSEY STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION NEW JERSEY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE TITLE 7, CHAPTER 27, SUBCHAPTER 17

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS. No May 2014 NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT: WASTE ACT, 2008 (ACT NO. 59 OF 2008)

Organic Chemistry Lab Renovation SECTION SUSTAINABLE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS CAL GREEN

APPENDIX H REVIEW OF TECHNICAL LITERATURE ON SEPTIC SYSTEMS

425 MCCARTNEY STREET, ARNPRIOR, ONTARIO REF.: 12-XXX

Appendix W: Solid and Hazardous Waste

RYTON (PPS) Chemical Compatibility & Chemical Resistance Chart

NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

PTPD-T-N01-S Yokogawa Group Green Procurement Guidelines Version 4.3

Drinking-Water Systems Regulation O. Reg. 170/03

Christopher Morgan, PhD Environment & Energy Office, City of Toronto. First Generation AQ Modelling at AQIB (2000) AQ Improvement Branch & Sweepers

Product Stewardship Summary Perchloroethylene August 31, 2017 version

SVCW Use: City: State: Zip Code: Phone:

Air Quality Assessment

Discharge and Discovery Reporting Standard. Saskatchewan Environmental Code

STATEMENT OF BASIS. For the issuance ofdraft Air Permit # 1140-AOP-R4 AFIN: PERMITTING AUTHORITY:

COLD SOLVENT CLEANING AND STRIPPING OPERATIONS (Adopted & Effective 5/23/07) (2) Any cleaning of application equipment is not subject to this rule.

Float standard programme

Lake Erie Works 2010 Annual Toxics Reduction Report (O. Reg. 455/09)

Transcription:

United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pollution EPA 745-K-94-15 Prevention and Toxics May 1994 748 EPA s 33/5 Program Company Profile Raytheon Company Printed on Recycled Paper

THE 33/5 PROGRAM This Company Profile is part of a series of reports being developed by EPA to highlight the accomplishments of companies participating in the 33/5 Program. The 33/5 Program is an EPA voluntary pollution reduction initiative that promotes reductions in direct environmental releases and offsite transfers of 17 high-priority toxic chemicals. The program derives its name from its overall goals -- an interim goal of a 33% reduction by 1992 and an ultimate goal of a 5% reduction by 1995. The program uses 1988 Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) reporting as a baseline. In February, 1991, EPA began contacting the parent companies of TRI facilities that reported using 33/5 Program chemicals since 1988 to request their participation in the 33/5 Program. As of April, 1994, a total of 1,216 companies had elected to participate in the Program, pledging to reduce emissions of the 17 target chemicals by more than 355 million 17 PRIORITY CHEMICALS TARGETED pounds by 1995. Companies are encouraged to BY THE 33/5 PROGRAM set their own reduction targets, which may vary from the Program s national 33% and 5% reduction goals. Company commitments and reduction pledges continue to be received by EPA on a daily basis. The 1992 TRI data revealed that releases and transfers of 33/5 Program chemicals declined by 4% between 1988 and 1992, surpassing the Program s 1992 interim reduction goal by more than 1 million pounds. This accomplishment, together with evidence from analysts of facilities projected releases and transfers of the 17 priority chemicals, reported to TRI under the Pollution Prevention Act, offers strong encouragement that the 33/5 Program s ultimate goal of a 5% reduction by 1995 will be achieved. BENZENE CADMIUM & COMPOUNDS CARBON TETRACHLORIDE CHLOROFORM CHROMIUM & COMPOUNDS CYANIDES DICHLOROMlZTHANE* LEAD & COMPOUNDS MERCURY & COMPOUNDS METHYL ETHYL KETONE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE NICKEL & COMPOUNDS TETRACHLOROETHYLENE TOLUENE 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHYLENE XYLENES * Also referred to as methylene chloride EPA is committed to recognizing companies for their participation in the 33/5 Program and for the emissions reductions they achieve. The Program issues periodic Progress Reports, in which participating companies are listed and highlighted. In addition, Company Profiles, such as this one, are being prepared to provide more detailed information about companies that have written to EPA describing significant emissions reduction initiatives. Information presented in these profiles is drawn primarily from the company s written 33/5 Program communications and the annual TRI reports submitted by their facilities (including Pollution Prevention Act data reported to TRI in Section 8 of Form R). All company communications to EPA regarding the 33/5 Program are available to the public upon request. EPA does not endorse the performance, worker safety, or environmental acceptability of any of the technical options discussed in this Profile. Mention of any product or procedure in this document is for informational purposes only, and does not constitute a recommendation of any such product or procedure, either express or implied, by EPA. For information on the 33/5 Program, contact the TSCA Hotline at (22) 554-144 or contact 33/5 Program staff directly by phone at (22) 26-697 or by mail at Mail Code 748, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, U. S. EPA, 41 M Street, SW Washington, D.C. 246. 33/5 Program Company Profile Raytheon Company i

Raytheon Company Raytheon Company reduced its releases and transfers of 33/5 Program chemicals by approximately 2,5, pounds from 1988 to 1992, a reduction of 65%. These reductions surpass Raytheon s 33/5 Program goal of a 5% reduction by 1995. I. CORPORATE BACKGROUND Raytheon Company is a diversified organization whose major interests include manufacturing of aircraft, residential and commercial appliances (including refrigeration, cooking, and laundry equipment), electronics (including guidance systems, guided missiles, printed circuit boards, and communications equipment), and energy/environmental services (including power, transportation, logistics support, and road building equipment). Raytheon is headquartered in Lexington, Massachusetts and had twenty five facilities in the United States that reported releases and transfers of 33/5 Program chemicals to the TRI in 1988. Table I, at the end of this profile, presents the company s data on releases and transfers of TRI chemicals. Table II presents these data for selected facilities. In 1988 Raytheon reported releases and transfers of eleven 33/5 Program chemicals: chromium and compounds, dichloromethane, lead and compounds, methyl ethyl ketone, methyl isobutyl ketone, nickel and compounds, tetrachloroethylene, toluene, l,l,l-trichloroethane, trichloroethylene, and xylene. Raytheon reduced releases and transfers of 33/5 Program chemicals by 65% 2,5, pounds) from 1988 to 1992. Raytheon reported total releases and transfers of 3,883,82 pounds of 33/5 Program chemicals in 1988. Three chemicals - 1,1,1-trichloroethane, dichloromethane, and trichloroethylene - accounted for 65% of these releases and transfers. Dichloromethane was used at several facilities in paint stripping and manufacturing printed circuit boards. 1,1,1-Trichloroethane and trichloroethylene are used primarily as solvents to clean electronics. Lead, chromium, xylene, and toluene are used as solvents and pigments in paints, soldering, and for surface conditioning prior to painting. Releases and of TRI Chemicals Reported by Raytheon Company (1 lbs) 1988 1992 33/5 Chemicals Chromium & compounds 56 13 Dichloxomethane 61 NR Lead & compounds 8 NR Methyl ethyl ketone 211 151 Methyl isobutyl ketone 41 37 Nickel & compounds 67 6 Tetrachloroethylene 96 NR Toluene 364 225 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1,643 611 Trichloroethylene 447 125 Xylene 339 192 33/5 Subtotal* 3,884 1,361 Other TRI chemicals 2,3 668 Total* 5,886 2,29 NR = Not reported to TRI, use below reporting threshold. * Columns do not sum to total due to rounding. II. CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGY Raytheon s environmental strategy has focused on eliminating the use of suspected or known carcinogens and ozone-depleting substances (ODS), and reducing the use of metals. In 199, Raytheon s President issued a directive for all Raytheon facilities to eliminate the use of the suspected carcinogens trichloroethylene, perchloroethylene, and dichloromethane. In addition, Raytheon set a company-wide goal to eliminate the use of all ODSs by the end of 1992. As part of its activities, the company has developed a program called ACT (Alternative Cleaning Technologies) and has shared its findings of alternatives to the use of ozone-depleting solvents at technical conferences throughout the United States. Raytheon has also established a five-year educational professorship at Tufts University to 33/5 Program Company Profile: Raytheon Company 1

develop a pollution prevention program. As part of this program, engineers will learn to consider and incorporate pollution prevention approaches when developing product and manufacturing plans. Distributions of Reductions in Releases and, 1988-1992 III. 33/5 PROGRAM GOALS AND POLLUTION REDUCTION ACTIVITIES Raytheon set a corporate-wide goal to reduce releases and transfers of 33/5 Program chemicals by 5% by 1995 compared to the 1988 TRI baseline. This translates to a pledged reduction of 1,941,91 pounds. Raytheon s reductions of 33/5 Program chemicals were achieved as a result of several ongoing projects. Eliminate or reduce solvents in cleaning operations. Dichloromethane, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, tetrachloroethylene, trichloroethylene,and CFC-113 were all targeted by Raytheon s ODS and suspected carcinogen phaseout goals. In 1988, these solvents were used at 18 facilities for electronics cleaning and metal degreasing, and as general solvent cleaners. Terpene-based cleaners and mildly alkaline aqueous solutions were identified as alternatives to these solvent cleaners. Raytheon has successfully eliminated its use of dichloromethane, tetrachloroethylene, and CFC-113, and has significantly reduced its use of l,l,l-trichloroethane and trichloroethylene as a result of the development of these alternate cleaners. Raytheon identified a terpene-based cleaner and a mildly alkaline aqueous solution which are now used in place of chlorinated solvents at its facilities. Eliminate the use of dichloromethane for paint stripping applications. At the Wichita facility, dichloromethane was used to strip paint from aircraft. Raytheon implemented a dry media (wheat starch) blasting system for paint stripping that completely eliminated the need for dichloromethane at this facility. Reduce 33/5 Program chemicals in painting and soldering applications. Lead, chromium, toluene, and xylene are used at Raytheon facilities in painting and soldering operations. Raytheon has identified and implemented a powder paint system in some facilities which has resulted in a reduction of releases and transfers of these chemicals. For applications in which powder painting is not technically feasible, Raytheon is working with its coating suppliers to reduce the amount of solvent used in its coatings. IV. PROGRESS TOWARDS 33/5 REDUCTION GOALS As a result of these and other efforts, Raytheon s releases and transfers of 33/5 program chemicals decreased over 2.5 million pounds between 1988 and 1992 - a 65% reduction from 3,883,82 pounds to 1,36,658 pounds. The major components of this reduction were the elimination of dichloromethane and tetrachloroethylene, and the significant reduction of releases and transfers of 1,1,1-trichloroethane and trichloroethylene. The phaseout of the use of dichloromethane and tetrachloroethylene resulted in a reduction of 76,71 pounds of releases and transfers of these chemicals between 1988 and 1992. These reductions account for approximately 28% of total reductions of releases and transfers of 33/5 chemicals during that period. The replacement of 1,1,1- trichloroethane and trichloroethylene resulted in a reduction of 1,354,654 pounds of releases and transfers of these chemicals. This reduction accounts for approximately 54% of total 33/5 reductions from 1988 to 1992. 33/5 Program Company Profile: Raytheon Company 2

Raytheon has shown its commitment to furthering knowledge of pollution prevention by establishing a five-year educational professorship at Tufts University to develop a pollution prevention program. Raytheon s Progress Towards Meeting 33/5 Goals Although not part of its 3315 Program goal, Raytheon was also successful in reducing releases and transfers of non-33/5 Program TRI chemicals by over 1,3, pounds -- a reduction of 67%. Reductions of non-33/5 Program chemicals consisted primarily of reductions in releases of ammonia, copper, CFC-12, CFC-11, CFC-113, hydrochloric acid, and manganese from the Lowell, MA, Waltham, MA, and Portsmouth, RI, facilities. V. SUMMARY OF RAYTHEON S EXPERIENCE Raytheon Company has exceeded its 33/5 Program goals by several years. The company pledged to reduce its releases and transfers of 33/5 program chemicals by 5% by 1995, and achieved a reduction of 65% by 1992. Raytheon has realized its largest reductions in releases and transfers of 33/5 program chemicals by focusing its reduction programs on known or suspected carcinogens and ozone-depleting substances. 33/5 Goal: 5% reduction in releases and transfers of 33/5 chemicals by 1995 By establishing a pollution prevention professorship, sharing its findings in the search for alternatives to ODS solvent cleaners, and working closely with host communities and regulatory agencies, Raytheon has demonstrated a sincere commitment to environmental protection. Furthermore, in looking to the future, Raytheon has adopted a We re not stopping here attitude in its efforts to prevent pollution at its source. 33/5 Program Company Profile: Raytheon Company 3

Table I Raytheon Company Releases and of TRI Chemicals, 1988-1992 (All data from TRI unless otherwise. noted)

Table I Raytheon Company Releases and of TRI Chemicals, 1988-1992 (All data from TRI unless otherwise noted) Chemical Percent Surface Off-site Change Total Air Water Releases for Treatment/ Total Releases 1988-1992 Emissions Discharges to Land to POTWs Disposal/Other and Total Releases Year (1) and All 33/5 Program Chemicals 1988 3,193,798 2,234 58 2,617 685,113 3,883,82 (2) 1989 2,967,932 742 8,24 24,539 3,181,453 199 2,274,289 65 2,61 123,23 2,399,438 1991 1,487,387 55 912 228,382 1,717,186 1992 1,29,666 256 854 149,882 1,36,658-65 % Non 33/5 Program Chemicals 1988 931,73 17,579 2,565 1,51,344 2,2,561 1989 911,44 4,113 33,718 341,325 1,29,596 199 586,21 1,588 34,325 237,233 859,347 1991 47,239 1.15 41,826 397,232 91,312 1992 357,673 1.25 21,132 288,279 668.334-67% All TRl Chemicals 1988 4,124,871 19,813 58 5,182 1989 3,879,372 4,855 41,958 199 2,86,49 1,653 36,386 1991 1,957,626 1,52 42,738 1992 1,567,339 1,56 21,986 1,736,457 5,886,381 (2) 545,864 4,472,49 36,256 3,258,785 625,614 2,627,498 438,161 2,28,992-66% Percent Change, 1988-1992 33/5 Program Chemicals -62% -89% -1% -67% -78% -65% Non 33/5 Program chemicals -62% -93% -- 724 % -73% -67% All TRI Chemicals -62% -92% -1% 324% -75% -66% (1) Total Releases and for 1991 and 1992 do not include on- or off-site recycling or energy recovery. (2) Includes adjustment for data erroneously reported in Off-Site for Treatment at Raytheon s Searcy, AR facility.

Table II Raytheon Company (Selected Facilities) Releases and of TRI Chemicals, 1988-1992 Surface Off-site Total Air Water for Treatment/ Total Releases Chemical Year Emissions Discharges to POTWS Disposal/Other and (1) Raytheon Co. - Andover, MA Dichloromethane 1988 234,56 16,29 25,85 1989 125,733 1,422 127,155 199 58.469 1,894 6,363 Other 33/5 Program Chemicals 1988 546,984 1989 439,521 199 359,48 1991 233,6 1992 16.621 29 34,2 851,15 127 49,968 489,616 55,488 414,896 5 35,934 269,539 3 27,935 134,559 All TRI Chemicals 1988 926,943 1989 68,875 199 522,942 1991 291,943 1992 144,628 674 449,94 1,377,557 1,32 15,98 787,815 1,17 119,12 643,61 1,686 99,79 392,78 555 89,918 235,11 Raytheon Co. Div. - Waltham, MA Dichloromethane 1988 188, 21 31, 219,21 1989 284, 13 35 284,363 Other 33/5 Program Chemicals 1988 97,94 1989 88,755 199 78, 1991 41,9 1992 18.4 45,3 142,97 7 4,724 93,486 1 5,35 83,36 45 42,35 67 19,7 All TRl Chemicals 1988 344,353 1989 416,89 199 85,981 1991 45,33 1992 2,586 384 139,957 484,694 23,268 19,768 459,926 29,612 36,356 151,949 38,565 18,716 12,584 19,8 12,535 52,921

Table II Raytheon Company (Selected Facilities) Releases and of TRI Chemicals, 1988-1992 Chemical Year Total Air Emissions surface Water Discharges to POTWS Off-site for Treatment/ Disposal/Other Total Releases and (1) Beech Aircraft Corn. - Wichita, KS Dichloromethane Other 33/5 Program Chemicals All TRI Chemicals 1988 13,711 25 75 14,711 1989 118,13 25 2,294 12,647 1988 69,73 75 5,782 616,235 1989 692,775 75 77,234 77,759 199 82,27 5 755 12,59 833,62 1991 61,411 5 14 44,94 646,424 1992 646,846 1 86 45,78 692,11 1988 746,84 1,5 66,782 815,122 1989 85 1,43 1,25 87,45 939,725 199 85,539 5 1,955 41,9 893,589 1991 629,214 5 14 78,534 77,857 1992 674,839 1 86 122,335 797,261 Amana Refrigeration Inc. - Amana. IA 33/5 Program Chemicals 1988 255,45 1,25 1989 264,5 199 2,1 5 1991 129,91 25 1992 17,16 25 8,7 265,4 4,35 268,85 2,75 22,855 4,665 134,825 1 17,42 Non 33/5 Program Chemicals 1988 48,75 1,75 1989 94,95 7.5 199 67,915 1,56 1991 131,19 1 1992 15,135 1, 4,35 9,85 17,5 113,2 1,71 8,185 21,155 152,355 12,75 118,84 All TRI Chemicals 1988 34,2 3, 1989 359,45 75 199 268,15 1,565 1991 261,1 26 1992 212,295 1,25 49,5 356,25 21,85 382,5 13,46 283,4 25,82 287,18 12,715 226,26 (1) Total Releases and for 1991 and 1992 do not include on- or off-site recycling or energy recovery