Individual Genomic Prediction Report

Similar documents
Haplotypes, recessives and genetic codes explained

Understanding Results

Introduction. Data collection and evaluation activities

Genetics of dairy production

Fertility Factors Fertility Research: Genetic Factors that Affect Fertility By Heather Smith-Thomas

Revisiting the a posteriori granddaughter design

BLUP and Genomic Selection

Big Data, Science and Cow Improvement: The Power of Information!

Fundamentals of Genomic Selection

Understanding and Using Expected Progeny Differences (EPDs)

19. WORLD SIMMENTAL FLECKVIEH CONGRESS. The robust Fleckvieh cow breeding for fitness and health

Genomic selection and its potential to change cattle breeding

Genetic Improvement of Functional Traits in Cattle Report from EU Concerted Action GIFT

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

BREEDPLAN EBVs The Traits Explained

Answers to additional linkage problems.

Establishment of a Single National Selection Index for Canada

Practical integration of genomic selection in dairy cattle breeding schemes

Use of data from electronic milking meters and perspective in use of other objective measures

Strategy for applying genome-wide selection in dairy cattle

Improving fertility through management and genetics.

Breeding Great Cows... The Science and Art. Morgan Lundy. Jefferson, WI

What could the pig sector learn from the cattle sector. Nordic breeding evaluation in dairy cattle

Nichols Farms. Angus 8/12. Private Treaty Bull Sale 64 Years of. Superior Beef Genetics

Autozygosity by difference a method for locating autosomal recessive mutations. Geoff Pollott

TECHNICAL BULLETIN December 2017

Relationships between functional herd life and conformation traits in the South African Jersey breed

Delivering Valued Genomic Products to Livestock Customers

Section 4 - Guidelines for DNA Technology. Version October, 2017

Crossbreeding in Beef Cattle

Herd Summary Definitions

Quantitative Genetics

Welcome to Igenity Brangus and the Power of Confident Selection

The Data Which Breeders May Collect For BREEDPLAN Analysis Includes: Flight time (from bail head to light beam)

Genomic prediction. Kevin Byskov, Ulrik Sander Nielsen and Gert Pedersen Aamand. Nordisk Avlsværdi Vurdering. Nordic Cattle Genetic Evaluation

Applications of Genomic Technology to Cattle Breeding and Management

A Senior Project. presented to. the Faculty of the Dairy Science Department. California Polytechnic University, San Luis Obispo

29 th Annual BIC Bull Sale

Question. In the last 100 years. What is Feed Efficiency? Genetics of Feed Efficiency and Applications for the Dairy Industry

MCA/MSU Bull Evaluation Program 2016 Buyer Survey and Impact Report

The relationship between somatic cell count, milk production and six linearly scored type traits in Holstein cows

LAB. POPULATION GENETICS. 1. Explain what is meant by a population being in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.

TECHNICAL BULLETIN GENEMAX FOCUS - EVALUATION OF GROWTH & GRADE FOR COMMERCIAL USERS OF ANGUS GENETICS. November 2016

11/30/11. Lb output/beef cow. Corn Yields. Corn and Wheat

Genetics principlesof cattle breeding. Reviewandapplicationof mendelian genetics

UNDERSTANDING & USING GENEMAX FOCUS TM

Proceedings, The Range Beef Cow Symposium XXIII December 3, 4 and 5, 2013 Rapid City, South Dakota

The new infrastructure for cattle and sheep breeding in Ireland.

Nordic NTM promotion

Genetics Test. Multiple Choice Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Gen e e n t e i t c c V a V ri r abi b li l ty Biolo l gy g Lec e tur u e e 9 : 9 Gen e et e ic I n I her e itan a ce

Lecture 3 Monohybrid and Dihybrid Crosses

Genetic Problems (II) TWO or MORE GENE INHERITANCE

Experiences in the use of genomics in ruminants in Uruguay

Chp 10 Patterns of Inheritance

Breeding Program of the Bulgarian Murrah Buffalo

Biology Genetics Practice Quiz

Population and Community Dynamics. The Hardy-Weinberg Principle

wheat yield (tonnes ha 1 ) year Key: total yield contribution to yield made by selective breeding Fig. 4.1

Improving Genetics in the Suckler Herd by Noirin McHugh & Mark McGee

7-1. Read this exercise before you come to the laboratory. Review the lecture notes from October 15 (Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium)

Invited Review: Crossbreeding in Dairy Cattle: A Danish Perspective

A Basic Guide to. BREEDPLAN EBVs BREEDPLAN

Genomic selection +Sexed semen +Precision farming = New deal for dairy farmers?

Using Live Animal Carcass Ultrasound Information in Beef Cattle Selection

Nichols Farms. Angus. Private Treaty Bull Sale 65 Years of. Superior Beef Genetics 4/25/18

Name Date Class. In the space at the left, write the letter of the term or phrase that best completes each statement or answers each question.

IMPACT OF SEED STOCK SELECTION ON THE ECONOMICS OF A COW-CALF OPERATION

Philippine Dairy Buffalo Breeding Program

Chapter 14. Mendel and the Gene Idea

Q.2: Write whether the statement is true or false. Correct the statement if it is false.

1 This research was conducted under cooperative agreements between USDA, ARS, Montana Agric. Exp.

Genetics Essentials 9/10/13. Concepts and Connections. Mendel and His Study of Heredity. The Case of the Red Hair. Before we Continue

Bean Bunny Evolution Modeling Gene Frequency Change (Evolution) in a Population by Natural Selection

Beef cattle recording and selection

Heredity and DNA Assignment 1

Chapter 14: Mendel and the Gene Idea

CHARACTERIZATION OF HEREFORD AND TWO-BREED ROTATIONAL CROSSES OF HEREFORD W ANGUS AND SIMMENTAL CAllLE: CALF PRODUCTION THROUGH WEANING

Genetic Equilibrium: Human Diversity Student Version

TSB Collaborative Research: Utilising i sequence data and genomics to improve novel carcass traits in beef cattle

france, genetic selection & technology-driven innovation

Operation of a genomic selection service in Ireland

International Livestock Registry

Breeding for Profit from Beef Production ( )

Breed Utilization and Production Efficiency

AP BIOLOGY Population Genetics and Evolution Lab

We can use a Punnett Square to determine how the gametes will recombine in the next, or F2 generation.

How to manage or remove inherited diseases from animal populations using Homozygosity Mapping Manual Version 1.0

Genetics - Problem Drill 05: Genetic Mapping: Linkage and Recombination

DESIGNS FOR QTL DETECTION IN LIVESTOCK AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR MAS

COW CALF BREEDING AND GENETICS. Dhuyvetter

Mendel & Inheritance. SC.912.L.16.1 Use Mendel s laws of segregation and independent assortment to analyze patterns of inheritance.

four chromosomes ` four chromosomes correct markers (sister chromatids identical!)

Introduction to Indexes

Linkage & Genetic Mapping in Eukaryotes. Ch. 6

DO NOT OPEN UNTIL TOLD TO START

Gregor Mendel solved the puzzle of heredity

Transcription:

Interpreting Holstein Association USA s Individual Prediction Report When you genomic test an animal through Holstein Association USA, you will receive a report with a variety of traits and their genomic PTA values, as well as the animal s original parent average PTAs. The genomic PTAs will appear on the animal s pedigree and other performance products following the next national genetic evaluation run (which takes place in April, August and December). You will receive genomic PTAs and STAs for the following traits: Selection Indexes: Total Performance Index (GTPI) is a registered service mark of Holstein Association USA. Net Merit (NM$) is calculated by USDA/CDCB. These indexes combine several economically important traits into a single value, helping dairy producers breed more profitable cattle. More information about the TPI formula can be found at www.holsteinusa.com on the Genetic Evaluations page. Yield Traits: Milk, Fat (lbs), Fat %, Protein (lbs), Protein %, Feed Efficiency Index (FE) Health Traits: Daughter Pregnancy Rate (DPR), Productive Life (PL), Livability (LIV), Somatic Cell Score (SCS), Heifer Conception Rate (HCR), Cow Conception Rate (CCR), Fertility Index (FI) 20 Type Traits and Type Composite Indexes: See sample report for the complete list of type traits and composite indexes reported. Calving Traits: Daughter Calving Ease, Sire Calving Ease, Daughter Stillbirth, Sire Stillbirth, and Gestation Length You may receive your genomic prediction reports via email or postal mail, and also view them within the Enlight online genetic management tool. Learn more about Enlight at www.enlightdairy.com. Explanation of the Prediction Report The following information will help you interpret the report you receive after genomic testing an animal through Holstein Association USA. See the example report on the last two pages to follow along with the numbers below. 1 1 Animal Identification Information On the top of the report you will find the name, registration number, herd management ID number, date of birth, sire and dam of the animal the report is issued for. 2 2 Future Inbreeding Coefficient The GFI is comparable to the Expected Future Inbreeding (EFI) numbers that are assigned to non-genomic tested animals. This value is an estimate of the level of inbreeding the progeny of this animal will contribute in the population if mated at random, based on homozygosity and percentage of genes an animal has in common with the Holstein population. 3 3 Predicted Transmitting Abilities (PTA) and Official Parent Averages (PA) or PTAs These columns provide a comparison between an animal s new genomic PTAs and their former parental averages or PTAs. Comparing between the two columns allows you to see how much an animal changed based on the actual genes they possessed. PTAs will not appear on Official Holstein Pedigrees until after they have gone through an official genetic evaluation, which happens in April, August and December.

4 4 and Traditional Reliabilities These columns show the increase in reliability between an animal s traditional evaluation and their new genomic evaluation. The increased reliability indicates that more information has been added to the evaluation. 5 5 Other Information This line describes which version of the SNP chip was used for the test, the month the results were delivered, as well as the date the report you are viewing was generated. Explanation of the Genetic Condition, Haplotype & Added Content Report 6 6. Most genomic tests come with a variety of added content that is provided to dairy producers with their genomic PTAs. Some conditions are included free with the genomic test and some tests are available for an additional cost. Additionally, USDA/CDCB provides haplotype results for the prominent genetic conditions found in Holstein cattle, as well as Haplotypes Impacting Fertility. INTERPRETING OFFICIAL GENETIC CODES Animals who have had a specific gene test performed for the condition in question will have a two- or three-character label, indicating whether they have been tested free or found to be a carrier for the condition. Following are examples of official genetic codes you may see on your Genetic Condition Report (if the specific gene test was requested). CVM TV (tested free) or CV (tested carrier) Brachyspina TY (tested free) or BY (tested carrier) BLAD TL (tested free) or BL (tested carrier) DUMPS TD (tested free) or DP (tested carrier) Mulefoot TM (tested free) or MF (tested carrier) Cholesterol Deficiency TC (tested free) or CD (tested carrier) Horned/Polled TP (tested free), PC (tested heterozygous, one copy of the polled allele), or PP (tested homozygous, two copies of the allele); additionally, animals may have the official genetic code of PO, meaning the breeder reported the animal as being Observed Polled, but the animal has not had the official test to confirm. Dominant Red DR1 (tested heterozygous, one copy of Dominant Red allele), DR2 (tested homozygous, two copies of the allele). Animals who are not carriers for Dominant Red (DR0) will not be labelled. Recessive Red TR (tested free) or RC (tested carrier) UNDERSTANDING HAPLOTYPE CODES A haplotype is a combination of alleles (DNA sequences) at different locations on a chromosome that are transmitted together as a group (linked). s is giving us more insight into the genetics of our cattle than ever before, leading more informed, better decision-making on the farm. Dairy researchers have discovered five Haplotypes Impacting Fertility (as of December 2014) which are officially recognized by Holstein Association USA and the greater dairy industry; referred to as HH1, HH2, HH3, HH4 and HH5, these haplotypes are believed to cause embryonic or fetal death when present in homozygous form, i.e., the offspring inherits the haplotype from both the sire and dam. In a herd, this would appear as if a cow did not conceive, resulting in greater days open and lower conception rates. Researchers have found that these haplotypes never occur in homozygous form amongst any living animal (that had their genome tested). That scenario is highly unlikely based on population probabilities, unless affected animals did not survive to birth.

In July 2015, dairy researchers identified a new deleterious haplotype, called Holstein Haplotype Associated with Cholesterol Deficiency (HCD). This is a more serious defect than the Haplotypes Impacting Fertility, as animals who are homozygous for the unfavorable haplotype only survive a few months from birth. There are two versions of the haplotype, one which is lethal in homozygous form. The two haplotype versions look identical when examining only the surrounding marker genotypes. Pedigree information, combined with having knowledge of the haplotype status of earlier ancestors, allows for an accurate determination. The haplotype carrying the defect is difficult to track because both the normal version and the defected version occur frequently Codes of 0 to 4 are being used to denote an animal s status on Holstein Association USA s reports, as noted below. CODES FOR HAPLOTYPE ASSOCIATED WITH CHOLESTEROL DEFICIENCY (HCD) Haplotype Code Description 0 Non-carrier: free of HCD 1 HCD Carrier: haplotype confirmed with pedigree information 2 Homozygous for HCD: confirmed on both sides of pedigree 3 Suspect carrier: haplotype origin could not be confirmed from pedigree 4 Suspect homozygous: probable carrier and may be homozygous; origin of haplotypes could not be confirmed from pedigree Haplotype results are also provided by USDA-CDCB at no charge for all traits for which an official genetic condition test is available, but not requested by the producer. Haplotype results can be useful for identifying animals that are good candidates for further genetic testing, and can also be used in conjunction with known genetic codes to trace different genetic conditions through the pedigree of an animal. Haplotype results are not considered official; performing the actual gene test for a condition (when available) is required for labelling on pedigrees and other official Holstein performance products. It is also important to note that haplotype results are not a 100% accurate indicator of whether or not an animal is a carrier or free of a condition. In the case where an animal has an actual gene test result and a haplotype result, the actual gene test result should always be considered official. Most haplotypes have simple result reporting: T indicates the animal is tested free of that haplotype and C indicates the animal is a carrier of the haplotype. For example, the haplotype associated with CVM is abbreviated as HHC; HHCT indicates an animal has tested free of that haplotype, and HHCC would indicate that an animal was found to carry that particular haplotype. With three potential genotypes, the haplotype associated with Polled has an addition to the codes above, and can be interpreted as follows:

CODES FOR HAPLOTYPE ASSOCIATED WITH POLLED (HHP) CODES Haplotype HHP Code Expected Genotype Expected Phenotype Expected Genetic Code (if official polled gene test is performed) T p p does not carry polled allele Horned TP C P p carries one copy of the polled allele Polled PC H P P carries two copies of the polled allele Polled PP Dominant Red and Recessive Red also have more possible genotypes, and they are coded as follows: CODES FOR HAPLOTYPE ASSOCIATED WITH RECESSIVE RED (HRR) Haplotype HRR Code Expected Genotype Expected Phenotype Expected Genetic Code (if official Recessive Red gene test is performed) 0 ED ED Black TR 1 ED EBR Black B/R 2 ED E+ Black RC 3 ED e Black RC 4 EBR EBR Black/Red B/R 5 EBR E+ Black/Red B/R RC 6 EBR e Black/Red B/R RC 7 E+ E+ Red RED 8 E+ e Red RED 9 e e Red RED

CODES FOR HAPLOTYPE ASSOCIATED WITH DOMINANT RED (HDR) Haplotype HDR Code Expected Genotype 0 DR0 animal carries 0 copies of the Dominant Red allele 1 DR1 animal carries 1 copy of the Dominant Red allele 2 DR2 animal carries 2 copies of Dominant Red allele Expected Phenotype Black Red Red Expected Genetic Code (if official Dominant Red gene test is performed) None (DR0 is not labelled on pedigrees or other performance products) DR1 DR2 On the Genetic Condition report, available information, either specific gene test or haplotype result, is provided for the animal itself, as well as the sire and dam (when available). With questions or for more information about your genomic predictions, call 800.952.5200. Holstein Association USA 1 Holstein Place, PO Box 808 Brattleboro, VT 05302-0808 800.952.5200 www.holsteinusa.com

EXAMPLE Individual Prediction LEANINGHOUSE JEDI 22998 840003138206195 F HMID: 22998 Rock Hill Dairy LLC, Dexter NM 1 5 DOB: 06/12/2017 GFI: 8.4 Sire: S-S-I MONTROSS JEDI-ET 840003123886035 Dam: LEANINGHOUSE RACER 21453 840003129136009 GENOMIC PREDICTIONS 2 PTA 3 4 PA/PTA SELECTION INDEX Total Performance Index (TPI) 2555 2500 73 31 Net Merit ($) 692 611 71 YIELD TRAITS Milk 1046 1256 74 31 Fat (lbs) 49 52 74 31 Fat (%) 0.04 74 Protein (lbs) 48 54 75 31 Protein (%) 0.06 75 Feed Efficiency 119 133 73 31 HEALTH TRAITS Daughter Pregnancy Rate (%) 2.8 1.9 69 28 Productive Life (months) 6.7 4.7 70 29 Livability 2.0 57 Somatic Cell Score 2.6 2.8 72 30 Heifer Conception Rate 1.3 1.7 62 27 Cow Conception Rate 3.7 3.2 68 28 Fertility Index 2.7 2.1 68 28 TYPE TRAITS Final Score (PTAT) 1.84 1.57 73 31 Feet/Legs Composite 1.20 1.26 Udder Composite 1.94 1.51 Stature 1.51 Strength 1.29 Body Depth 0.73 Dairy Form 0.04 Rump Angle 0.83 Rump Width 0.50 Rear Legs Side View -1.61 Rear Legs Rear View 1.35 Foot Angle 1.24 Feet/Leg Score 1.42 Fore Attachment 2.24 Rear Udder Height 2.50 Rear Udder Width 2.30 Udder Cleft 1.24 Udder Depth 2.18 73 Front Teat Placement 1.22 Rear Teat Placement 1.19 Teat Length -0.33 PTA calculated using 14K, Date Issued: August 2017 Printed: 08-08-17

EXAMPLE Individual Prediction - page 2 LEANINGHOUSE JEDI 22998 840003138206195 F HMID: 22998 Rock Hill Dairy LLC, Dexter NM DOB: 06/12/2017 GFI: 8.4 Sire: S-S-I MONTROSS JEDI-ET 840003123886035 Dam: LEANINGHOUSE RACER 21453 840003129136009 GENOMIC PREDICTIONS PTA PA/PTA CALVING TRAITS Daughter Calving Ease 4.5 4.4 54 26 Sire Calving Ease 7.6 60 Daughter Stillbirth 4.6 5.5 51 25 Sire Stillbirth 7.3 57 Gestation Length -0.7 64 6 GENETIC CONDITIONS 22998 SIRE DAM CVM HHCT(Non-Carrier) TV HHCT Brachyspina HH0T(Non-Carrier) TY HH0T BLAD TL HHBT(Non-Carrier) TL HHBT DUMPS TD HHDT(Non-Carrier) TD HHDT Mulefoot HHMT(Non-Carrier) HHMT Cholesterol Deficiency HCD0(Non-Carrier) HCD0 Horned/Polled HHPT(Non-Carrier) TP HHPT Dominant Red HDRT(Non-Carrier) HDRT Recessive Red TR HRR0(Non-Carrier) TR HRR0 Black/Red HBRT(Non-Carrier) HBRT HAPLOTYPES IMPACTING FERTILITY Haplotype 1 HH1T(Non-Carrier) HH1T Haplotype 2 HH2T(Non-Carrier) HH2T Haplotype 3 HH3T(Non-Carrier) HH3T Haplotype 4 HH4T(Non-Carrier) HH4T Haplotype 5 HH5T(Non-Carrier) HH5C MILK PROTEINS Kappa Casein BB BB For more on interpreting this report, visit www.holsteinusa.com Date Issued: August 2017 Printed: 08-08-17