PIONEER_STP. The Potential of Innovative Technologies to Improve Sustainability of Sewage Treatment Plants

Similar documents
Innovations in Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal

Municipal wastewater treatment in Latin-America:

BioWin 3. New Developments in BioWin. Created by process engineers.. for process engineers

Application of the AGF (Anoxic Gas Flotation) Process

Applying a circular economy model to wastewater treatment. Pete Vale WWT Wastewater st January, Birmingham

Shortcut Biological Nitrogen Removal for sustainable wastewater treatment and achieving energy neutrality

Carbon Heat Energy Assessment and. (CHEApet) Tutorials: Carbon Footprint Primer

WASTEWATER TREATMENT

Nutrient Recovery: A Focus on Ammonia

PHOSPHORUS RECOVERY FROM SEWAGE SLUDGE USING THE AQUACRITOX SUPERCRITICAL WATER OXIDATION PROCESS

Preparing for Nutrient Removal at Your Treatment Plant

New anaerobic technologies More biogas at lower costs

Aqua MSBR MODIFIED SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR

A Roadmap for Smarter Nutrient Management in a Carbon and Energy Constrained World. Samuel Jeyanayagam, PhD, PE, BCEE

Determination of design criteria for UASB reactors as a wastewater pretreatment system in tropical small communities

Carbon Redirection and its Role in Energy Optimization at Water Resource Recovery Facilities

Managing the Risk of Embracing Disruptive Technology

Developments in Anaerobic treatment of F&B wastewaters

AMMONIA REMOVAL FROM DIGESTED SLUDGE SUPERNATANT

Struvia Technology for Phosphorus Recovery. o Re-Water Braunschweig November 2015

by M k h GROVER Degremont

Sanitary Sewer Systems. Sewage Collection System. Types of Sewage 10/12/2016. General Overview

Deliverable Report of processes specifications anaerobic waste water purification process of mechanical pulping production

4 Angles. Pilot-scale Evaluation of AirPrex for Phosphorus Management. Innovation Program Phosphorus Initiative JTAC 4/22/2017

Biological Short-Cut Nitrogen Removal from Anaerobic Digestate in a Demonstration Sequencing Batch Reactor

Removal of High C and N Contents in Synthetic Wastewater Using Internal Circulation of Anaerobic and Anoxic/Oxic Activated Sludge Processes

COD REMOVAL OF CARDBOARD FACTORY WASTEWATER BY UPFLOW ANAEROBIC FILTER

Environmental Biotechnology Cooperative Research Centre Date submitted: March 2008 Date published: March 2011

Julian Sandino, PhD, PE, BCEE IWA & WEF Fellow

GAINS OF SWEDISH-POLISH RESEARCH CO-OPERATION IN ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING

Purple phototrophic bacteria for nutrient recovery from domestic wastewater treatment

Biothane Anaerobic Technology Memthane 2.0 WATER TECHNOLOGIES

NEW BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL CONCEPT SUCCESSFULLY APPLIED IN A T-DITCH PROCESS WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

Sustainable Wastewater Treatment

Biobed Advanced EGSB & Biothane Advanced UASB. Wastewater as a Resource WATER TECHNOLOGIES

EXTENDED SLUDGE RETENTION PROCESS WITH SLUDGE RECIRCULATION FOR INCREASING BIOGAS PRODUCTION AT ANAEROBIC DIGESTION

Anaerobic Reactor Technologies

Biothane Anaerobic Technology Memthane 2.0

(a) Department of Sustainable Organic Chemistry and Technology, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, B Ghent, Belgium

Sustainability and Innovation

Proposal by Russia to delete hot sub-spot Hot sub-spot name South-West Wastewater Treatment Plant

BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHOROUS REMOVAL AN OPERATOR S GUIDE

Improving Septic Tank Performance by Enhancing Anaerobic Digestion NOWRA Onsite Wastewater Mega-Conference

LABORATORY PROJECT: IMPACT OF VARIABLE LOADING ON A FIXED FILM REACTOR VERSUS A SUSPENDED GROWTH REACTOR

Steven Dickey. Abstract

JTAC Presentation May 18, Nutrient Removal Process Fundamentals and Operation

Biological Nitrogen and COD Removal of Nutrient-Rich Wastewater Using Aerobic and Anaerobic Reactors

Short-Cut Enhanced Nutrients Abatement (SCENA) From Reject Water: Moving The System Into Practice

Optimization of Anaerobic Digestion with Bio- Organic Catalyst Compositions (BOCs)

Efforts for use of methane gas in wastewater treatment of Japan

ANAEROBIC TREATMENT OF PAPER MILL WASTEWATER

- 1 - Retrofitting IFAS Systems In Existing Activated Sludge Plants. by Glenn Thesing

MAINSTREAM DEAMMONIFICATION

Model-based optimization of biofilm systems in wastewater treatment

Effect of the start-up length on the biological nutrient removal process

From residue to raw material

Sulaibiya world s largest membrane water reuse project

Circular Procurement. CIPRON project: Finnish Environment Institute IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute Copenhagen Resource Institute

Resource recovery from sludge treatment at Waterboard De Dommel (Netherlands) Jan-Evert van Veldhoven

Sanitary and Environmental Engineering I (4 th Year Civil)

Advances in Wastewater Treatment Technology

Advantages & Applications of MBBR Technologies

Select and price substrates with AMPTS II Light

TWO YEARS OF BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL WITH AN ADVANCED MSBR SYSTEM AT THE SHENZHEN YANTIAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

Construction of first wastewater treatment plant in Kosovo: an EU pilot project

Polishing Ponds. Biosolids Storage. Ammonia Removal. Digesters. Thickeners. Pretreatment. Final Clarifiers. Primary Clarifiers.

Wisconsin Wastewater Operators Association October 4 th 7 th LaCrosse, WI

AquaNereda Aerobic Granular Sludge Technology

Modelling of an Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket reactor

High-value products from Anaerobic Digestion-Norwegian experience

Water Quality Control in RAS: The importance of an anaerobic treatment stage for removing nitrate, phosphate, and off-flavor compounds

KINETIC ANALYSIS AND SIMULATION OF UASB ANAEROBIC TREATMENT OF A SYNTHETIC FRUIT WASTEWATER

Wastewater Management in Developing Countries. Dr. Mushtaq Ahmed Memon Programme Officer, UNEP IETC

What type of Digester Configurations should be employed to produce Biomethane from Grass Silage?

AquaPASS. Aqua MixAir System. Phase Separator. System Features and Advantages. Anaerobic. Staged Aeration. Pre-Anoxic.

Photo-Activated Sludge System (PAS): A novel algal-bacterial biotreatment for nutrient rich wastewater

Flexible Platform Technologies for Resource Recovery from Food Waste

COMPARISON STUDY BETWEEN INTEGRATED FIXED FILM ACTIVATED SLUDGE (IFAS), MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR (MBR) AND CONVENTIONAL ACTIVATED SLUDGE (AS) PROCESSES

THE USE OF PROCESS MODELING SOFTWARE IN INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT - CASE STUDIES THAT ADDRESS AIR EMISSION, METALS REMOVAL AND WATER REUSE

THE USE OF ULTRASOUND TO ACCELERATE THE ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF WASTE ACTIVATED SLUDGE. Ewa Neczaj, Joanna Lach

COMPARING THE EFFICIENCY OF UAFF AND UASB WITH HYBRID REACTOR IN TREATING WOOD FIBER WASTEWATER

WASTE WATER T*R*E*A*T*M*E*N*T T*E*C*H*N*O*L*O*G*I.E

STRUCTURAL AND OPERATIONAL STUDY OF 339 MLD SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT AT AMBERPET

Circular economy in the region of Amsterdam. Edwin de Buijzer KWR Watercycle Research Institute. 3 November 2015

Activated Sludge Treatment Extended Aeration (EA) and Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR) Systems

Food and Energy in a Circular Economy

Energy self-sufficiency as a feasible concept for wastewater treatment systems

GRANULAR ACTIVATED SLUDGE

Past, present and future of water treatment

MARPAK modular biomedia WASTEWATER TREATMENT

JEDDAH INDUSTRIAL CITY

Fixed-Film Processes

Deliverable 5-2: Report on Life Cycle Analysis: a) Composting and b) Anaerobic Digestion

Phosphorus Extraction & Recovery. Copyright 2016, Renewable Nutrients, LLC

So You ve Removed Your Phosphorus? Now What? JTAC Luncheon April 9 th, 2014

Figure Trickling Filter

Seminar on the Production and Use of Biogas. Production and Use of Biogas: EU Regulations and Research. David Baxter

Technical Memorandum-Low Cost Retrofits for Nitrogen Removal at Wastewater Treatment Plants in the Upper Long Island Sound Watershed

Proposal by Russia to delete hot spot 18.2

NPDES COMPLIANCE OF COOLING TOWERS BLOWDOWN AT POWER PLANTS WITH RECLAIMED WATER AS SOURCE WATER

Transcription:

PIONEER_STP The Potential of Innovative Technologies to Improve Sustainability of Sewage Treatment Plants

Partnership Principal Investigator Institution Country Juan M. Lema University of Santiago de Compostela Spain David Bolzonella University of Verona Italy Gürkan Sin Technical University of Denmark Denmark Elzbieta Plaza Royal Institute of Technology Sweden Jose R. Vazquez-Padin FCC Aqualia Spain

The Pioneer_STP strategy Development of innovative technologies for the treatment of wastewater, sludge and centrate. Characterization under a multicriteria perspective (design and operation, effluent quality, emissions, removal efficiency, costs, energy, etc.). Evaluation of the impact of integrating these technologies within the global plant layout. Optimization of the STP taking into account the strong interdependencies between the different streams. Holistic assessment (environmental, economic, energetic, risk).

Objectives The Main Objective is to assess the impact of innovative units (nowadays at lab- or pilot-scale or in their early stages of industrial implementation) on the global plant efficiency and sustainability, taking into account nutrients, energy, Emerging Pollutants (EPs), greenhouse gases (GHGs) and cost/benefit balances. Sub-Objectives 1. Develop 4 Unit Technological Solutions (UTS), two of them focused on energy recovery from valuable organic matter (UTS1&2) and two on nutrients removal/recovery (UTS3&4). 2. Combine the UTS into different plant layouts (using a superstructurebased optimization framework) 3. Assess the STP in terms of technical, environmental, energetic and economical aspects 4. Optimize the STP by modeling and simulation

Unit Technological Solutions Stream Technology Main Target Water line Sludge Line Mainstream Water Line Centrate from the AD 1.a) Upstream wastewater concentration 1.b)High rate activated sludge (HRAS) 1.c) Anaerobic Treatment 2) Thermal pre-treatment 3.a) Modified ELAN process 3.b) IFAS anammox 4.a) Via nitrite N removal and P hyper-accumulation (SCENA) 4.b) ELAN + struvite precipitation 1a),1 b) Improve Energy balance by organic load in the water line by sludge production 1.c) Energy recovery in the water line Energy production during sludge Anaerobic Digestion - N removal - Oxygen demand - N removal - P recovery

The Pioneer_STP strategy

a) A Fig.2. database Superstructure containing information definition performance of design space and economics for novel of STPs treatment units and optimization problem solved for different objective function formulations (economics, environmental, etc.) b) The process design solution will be further optimized by using a dynamic plant wide modelling platform (PWM). c) This will provide the data for assessing Risks and Environmental and Energetic impacts (LCA, RA, LCC) Process integration Superstructure based optimization framework

WP 7. Holistic Assessment Fig. 3. WP structure of Pioneer_STP WP8. Dissemination & Exploitation Work Plan WP1. Management & Coordination WP2: Main stream OM removal WP3: Enhanced sludge treatment Impacts WP6: Process Integration WP5: Nutrient removal in the supernatant WP4: Main stream N removal

WP2 M1 to M24 Main stream OM removal Partners Involved UNIVR, KTH, USC Objectives: To enhance OM removal in the mainstream in order to promote autotrophic nitrogen removal in WP4 and increase the energy balance Task 2.1 (USC, UNIVR months 1-18) Upstream wastewater concentration - Chemically enhanced coagulation-precipitation (cationic polymers, metal coagulants ) - Rotating belt dynamic filter with a fine mesh size after the head pumping station of the STP of Carbonera (Italy) to remove more than 50% of the total suspended solids. Task 2.2 (KTH months 1-24) A-stage and UASB OM removal from municipal wastewater in the mainstream is evaluated in an UASB reactor and also in a high rate activated sludge reactor (HRAS) working at a short SRT. The latter will increase the amount of OM available for biogas production in the sludge line while the first will produce the biogas directly in the mainstream.

WP3 M7 to M24 Enhanced sludge treatment Partners Involved USC Objectives: To evaluate the effect of thermal pre-treatment on the efficiency of sludge treatment and on digested sludge and centrate characteristics The UTS implemented in WP2, 3 & 4, will generate various sludge types (primary and secondary) that will be treated by AD. Our approach consists in (i) establishing a link between the sludge characteristics produced by the different UTS and the efficiency of AD in terms of biogas production and digested sludge and centrate quality and (ii) to enhance sludge stabilization by thermal pre-treatment. Task 3.1 (USC months 7-12) Single sludge characterization: batch biomethane potential (BMP) assays Task 3.2 (USC months 10-12) Thermal pre-treatment Task 3.3 (USC months 12-24) Continuous operation of AD pilot plant

WP4 M11 to M28 Main stream N removal Partners Involved KTH, Aqualia, USC Objectives: To evaluate the Anammox bacterial consortium at ambient temperatures with regard to their N removal potential and stability Task 4.1 (KTH months 11-28) Integrated fixed film activated sludge (IFAS) Removal will be done in two separate pilot-scale moving bed biofilm reactors (MBBR) of 200 L operated as IFAS mode with sludge recirculation, fully equipped with variety of on-line measurements. One will be coupled to the UASB and the other to the HRAS described in task 2.2. Task 4.2 (USC, Aqualia months 11-28) Anammox based process with granular biomass (Modified ELAN ) Partial nitrification (PN) and anammox processes will be initially studied in two separated units to establish the best operational conditions for each process. Special attention will be paid to the selection of those conditions allowing the suppression of NOB activity. In the last 6 months both processes will be fed with the effluent from WP2 either in a single unit or in two units connected.

WP5 M1 to M18 Nutrient removal in the supernatant Partners Involved Aqualia, UNIVR Objectives: To evaluate the efficiency of nutrient removal in the centrate of AD by two different strategies Description of Work Task 5.1. (UNIVR months 1-18) Optimization of sludge alkaline fermentation short cut SBR operation (SCENA) The alkaline fermentation reactor (0.5m 3 ) will treat the cellulosic sludge separated in task 2.1 in order to produce propionate-rich VFAs. The sludge fermentation liquid and the sludge reject water will be treated in a SBR (2.8 m 3 ) in order to remove N and P. Task 5.2 (Aqualia, USC months 1-18) Anammox + Struvite precipitation A pilot scale ELAN process will be operated treating the supernatant of the sludge anaerobic digester. EPs will be followed in the solid and liquid phases. Data from the full scale ELAN plant will be also used for the evaluation.

WP6 M1 to MM30 Process Integration Partners Involved DTU, USC Objectives: To develop a superstructure based optimization tool for generating new plant layouts, optimized and characterized by means of a plant-wide quantification tool, including mechanistic models for EPs and GHGs Task 6.1 (USC, DTU months 1-28) Data collection and analysis Data from the previous UTS (WP2, 3, 4 & 5) including COD, N, P, GHGs and EP, energy consumption/production, use of reactants, etc. Task 6.2 (DTU months 1-24) superstructure based optimization (i) the definition of the design space, the description of each alternative in the superstructure using steady-state process stoichiometry model, (ii) the optimization for different objective function formulations Task 6.3 (DTU months 1-30) Mechanistic modelling and plant wide simulation tool The ASM will be used and extended for EP removal and N 2 O and CO 2 production The plant-wide model will be developed based on the Benchmark

WP7 M19 to M36 Holistic assessment Partners Involved USC, DTU Objectives: Feasibility of the different UTS to improve the sustainability of STPs. Task 7.1 (USC months 18-30) Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Inventory tables will be prepared using the database obtained in WP6. To determine the overall environmental impacts as a result of the flows through the system, LCA integrates the environmental impact within relevant impact categories. Task 7.2 (USC months 18-24) Environmental Risk Assessment (RA). Inventory of effluent and sludge concentrations of the three EPs considered (diclofenac, 17-a ethinylestradiol, 17-b estradiol) analysed within WP2, 3, 4 &5 will be employed to perform the RA under both stream discharge and reuse scenarios. Task 7.3 (DTU, USC months 25-32) Economic impacts(lcc). The economic profiles from a Life Cycle perspective will be determined, including the representative life cycle stages. Task 7.4 (DTU, USC months 30-36) Holistic evaluation: integration multicriteria indicators. A systematic approach for assessment of importance of weights on decision making function will be performed using sensitivity analysis as well as pare to front analysis.

Expected Impacts Scientific and Technological Development of new technologies for water, sludge and centrate treatment Integrate nutrients, energy, GHGs, EPs and cost/benefit balances within the entire STP Economic STPs conceived as green factory for reducing pollution and recovering resources Incorporating the process economics into the optimization function

Expected Impacts Economic Decision support tool allowing to select the best plant layout in terms of sustainability fosters innovation and competitiveness of European water sector Strong collaboration University-Industry Societal Generation of high quality and safe waters (conventional pollutants, emerging pollutants) Protecting quality air (reducing GHG emission) Training of water professionals able to tackle the interdisciplinary approach needed for designing/upgrading the STP of the future

Expected Impacts Policy The EPs considered in this proposal are currently included in the watch list of priority substances of the WFD (diclofenac, 17- a ethinylestradiol, 17-b estradiol) Cutting GHG emissions under the Kyoto Protocol (WWT generates CO2, CH4 and N2O) Water JPI and European Research Area objectives JPI Water SRIA includes EP emissions with regards to developing safe water systems for citizens (pilot call 2013) Pioneer_STP combines basic and applied approaches (e.g. TRL 4-5 for low T Anammox; TRL 7 for SCENA and 8 for ELAN applied to centrate) Mobility plan to enhance cooperation and to maximize interdisciplinary and inter-sectoral collaborations is drafted.

PIONEER_STP The Potential of Innovative Technologies to Improve Sustainability of Sewage Treatment Plants