Lifecycle Assessment and Economics of Biochar from Forest Residues

Similar documents
Productivity and cost analysis of a mobile pyrolysis system deployed to convert mill residues into biochar

NCASI West Coast Regional Meeting Vancouver, September 2011 David Smith, Oregon State University

Productivity Estimates for Chippers and Grinders on Operational Southern Timber Harvests

ABSTRACT WOODY RESIDUES AND SOLID WASTE WOOD AVAILABLE FOR RECOVERY IN THE UNITED STATES, David B. McKEEVER * 1, Robert H.

Studying about Utilization of Biomass. Inspecting Forest management for Biomass. Exploring Biomass policies and Incentives

Bioenergy Carbon Neutral or Not?

Department of Natural Resources Forest Resource Management

Preliminary Report on Resource and Technology Assessment

Pros and Cons of Salvage and Restoration Operations

Life-Cycle Inventory Analysis of Manufacturing Redwood Decking

Bioenergy: What is it?

BIOENERGY OPPORTUNITIES AT GAY & ROBINSON. E. Alan Kennett President, Gay & Robinson, Inc.

Biomass Power Generation Resource and Infrastructure Requirements. Idaho Forest Restoration Partnership Conference, Boise, Idaho February 1, 2012

Memorandum of Understanding On Policy Principles For

Printing and Writing Papers Life- Cycle Assessment Frequently Asked Questions

What is LCA? LCA methodologies

Investing in Reforestation of Loblolly Pine in the Piedmont Based on Various Future Timber Price Scenarios By: John Sunday-Staff Forester

Production, Cost and Chip Characteristics of In-Woods Microchipping

A Life Cycle Assessment of small to medium sized heat producing bio-energy systems

Paper Mill Repowering with Gasification

ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY OF WOODY BIOMASS HARVESTING IN SOUTHEASTERN MISSOURI

Prospectus: Biochar Production Unit

Commercial scale gasification to replace fossil fuel in power generation Vaskiluodon Voima140 MW CFB Gasification Project

Biogas Cuts Climate Pollution

Biochar Carbon Sequestration

Productivity and Cost of Processing and Sorting Forest Residues

CHAPTER 2 BIOMASS SOURCES

Best Practices for Biomass Feedstock Handling and Management Wood Waste to Energy Facility for Tomslake/Kelly Lake

Determining Carbon Footprint of a Waste Wood Burning Power Plant

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Poplar Plantations Global warming potential and energy consumption in the US PNW

Biomass Production or Collection

Harvesting Western Juniper (Juniperus occidentalis) in Eastern Oregon - A Case Study

The Role of Agriculture and Forestry In Emerging Carbon Markets

Contract For Biomass-Fueled Generation. Presentation to the Gainesville City Commission May 7, 2009

Enterprise Budget. EM 8849 January 2004

SUSTAINABLE INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS

Final Research Report. Dominik Kaestner

Anaerobic Digestion. Waste to Energy Workshop for Farm, Food Processing, & Wood Industries. Presented To:

Harvey Logging, LLC. Rich Harvey. (360)

Biomass as an Energy Resource for Michigan: Opportunities, Challenges and Policies. William A. Knudson Working Paper January 2011

Biomass Wastes from Sustainable Forest Management: Energy and Air Quality Benefits

THE INTRODUCTION THE GREENHOUSE EFFECT

In Defense of Better Balance Between Centralized and Decentralized Wood Fuel Distribution Channels

COST EFFECTIVE, CONSTANT, AND RELIABLE BIOCHAR PRODUCTION FROM ORGANIC WASTE AND BIOSOLIDS

Sustainability and Bioenergy from Forests

CARBON FORESTRY WORKSHOP

OVERVIEW: CATF S FOREST & CLIMATE SYSTEMS PROGRAM

Economics of Torrefaction Plants and Businesses Buying Their Products

The Benefits of Renewable Energy From Biomass. Traxys Power Group, Inc.

State of knowledge: Quantifying Forest C capacity and potential. Tara Hudiburg NAS Terrestrial Carbon Workshop September 19 th, 2017

Torrefaction to Improve Biomass for Energy and Biofuels Production and Carbon Sequestion. Chris Hopkins, Research Associate

CRADLE-TO-GATE LIFE-CYCLE INVENTORY OF US WOOD PRODUCTS PRODUCTION: CORRIM PHASE I AND PHASE II PRODUCTS. Maureen E. Puettmann*{ Richard Bergman{

Assessing the Potential for Biomass Energy Development in South Carolina

The Biomass Option. Types of Biomass. Pellets market and products. Summary and Conclusions

Biomass Fuel Project. sustainability.uiowa.edu/biomass

Global Dynamics of the Pulp and Paper Industry 2017

Where Do We Go From Here? Ways Forward for the Biochar Community Tom Miles T R Miles Technical Consultants, Inc. Northwest Biochar Working Group

4/23/2018. Ways to Improve Profitability. Improving Logger Production Profitability. Case Study Facts. Case Study Facts

EPA Docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR September 13, 2010

SUNY ESF Gateway Center Sustainable Energy System

Piritta Pyörälä & Heli Peltola & Harri Strandman & Kilpeläinen Antti & Asikainen Antti & Kirsti Jylhä & Seppo Kellomäki

FORMEC 2016 From Theory to Practice: Challenges for Forest Engineering September 4 7, 2016, Warsaw, Poland

BIOMASS SOLUTIONS PERSPECTIVE BIOMASS TORREFACTION WORKSHOP APRIL 2011

Compare Costs of Different Fuels for Drying Lumber

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Thermal Processes. Examples for Gasification and Pyrolyses to Transportation Biofuels, Electricity and Heat

Improving Logger Production Profitability

Conclusions and Summary Report Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Marine Pilings

Chapter 2: Best Management Practices: Managing Cropping Systems for Soil Protection and Bioenergy Production

Biofuels Journal Webinar Series September 15, 2009 Federal Stimulus Funding, Incentives and Policies for the Biofuels Industry

December Abstract

Biochar: One of the solutions for climate change, land restoration and food security

Wooden Biomass in the Energy Sector - EU and international perspective -

Biochar Production and Utilization. By: Jonah G. Levine

International Advanced Coal Technologies Conference June 23-24, 2010

REDD: Cost-Benefit Analysis at the Country Level

The Big Picture: Relationship between Forests and Climate Change

Chapter 5 Renewable Energy. Helping to Sustainably Power the Town of Veteran into the Future

Biomass Electricity. Megan Ziolkowski November 29, 2009

NRMCA Member National and Regional Life Cycle Assessment Benchmark (Industry Average) Report

Woody Biomass Utilization

Sample Timber Sale Agreement

Climate Change Specialist Report final

Advanced Biofuels and Biorefinery Research at CanmetENERGY-Ottawa Fernando Preto

A preliminary comparative assessment of the climate impact of firewood supply from Belgium and Eastern Europe to the Belgian market

Towards sustainable international biomass trade strategies

BIOMASS. Leann Baer Brooke Edwards Nisarg Joshi Josh Olzinski

10 May 2017 SENT TO LSU AGCENTER/LOUISIANA FOREST PRODUCTS DEVELOPMENT CENTER - FOREST SECTOR / FORESTY PRODUCTS INTEREST GROUP

High Tonnage Harvesting and Skidding for Loblolly Pine Energy Plantations

Examining the Opportunities for Establishment of a New Kiln Drying Facility in the Scottish Borders 12 June 2014

Life Cycle Environmental Performance of Renewable Building Materials in the Context of Residential Construction

Shredders for Pallet Recycling

2/19/2013. Manure Management Introduction Thermochemical Technologies Introduction and Advantages

COST AND BENEFIT ANALYSIS FOR THE ELDER PROCESS

Feasibility assessment of geothermal pellet production from agricultural residues in medium-sized municipality in north Greece

Study Area: Central Valley, California, USA

Valuation of ecosystem services in an accounting context. Prof. Dr Lars Hein

Biomass availability and supply. Charles Friesen, Researcher, FPInnovations

ENERGY FROM FOREST BIOMASS SOME POTENTIAL BENEFITS AND PROBLEMS

North American Timber Outlook

Presentation Outline

Transcription:

Lifecycle Assessment and Economics of Biochar from Forest Residues Debbie Page-Dumroese Ted Bilek Maureen Puettmann Rocky Mountain Res. Station Forest Products Lab WoodLife Environmental Consultants August 23, 2017

Waste to Wisdom Project Overview Forest residuals and slash are an immense, underutilized resource. Creating biochar is one by-product that can be created from these residues using small-scale near-woods production. Our presentation will include information on Biochar applications Lifecycle analyses Biochar economics

Waste to Wisdom Project Overview Utilizing forest residuals for the production of bioenergy and bio-based products. Briquettes Torrefied Biomass Biochar Project Focus areas: Feedstock development Biomass conversion technologies Economic and environmental assessment

Webinar Outline 1. Environmental impacts of biochar application (Deb Page-Dumroese) a) Why biochar? b) Ecosystem responses 2. Lifecycle assessment of biochar (Maureen Puettmann) a) Methods b) Results - Global Warming Impact 3. Economics of torrefied biomass production (Ted Bilek) a) Analysis methodology b) Economic results 4. Question and answer period (moderated by Ted Bilek)

What is happening? Millions of acres of overstocked forests in the western US Millions of acres of beetle-killed forests in Canada and western US Longer fire season and increasing fire severity Smaller burn windows Insect and disease risk map

What to do with the nonmerchantable wood?

Current land management Forest restoration: thinning and salvage logging Pile and burn excess woody biomass Cheap, easy, reduces fire risk Pile burning can alter soil properties Long-term impacts

Other concerns Bioenergy harvesting could degrade long-term productivity HOWEVER Biochar applications can replace C removed during harvesting Improve soil conditions to lessen drought or nutrient stress

Reducing Risks and Increasing Benefits Increase soil water Decreased wildfire Decrease insect risk Decrease disease risk Increase soil carbon Climate change Carbon credits Decrease GHG emissions

The Role of Biochar Residual biomass converted to biochar can: Provide value to unmerchantable material Increase tree growth ~5-20% (or more) Restore skid trails, log landings, road beds water relations carbon sequestration Improve soil resiliency less erosion and leaching; improved infiltration; more resilient to floods and droughts

LCA of Biochar Presented by: Maureen Puettmann WoodLife Environmental Consultants Corvallis, OR Collaborators Elaine Oneil Consortium for Research on Renewable Industrial Materials (CORRIM) Mark Severy and David Carter Schatz Energy Research Center Humboldt State University

LCA of Biochar Task: What are the environmental impacts of producing biochar? Is there a relationship between biochar quality and environmental impacts? Is there a relationship between feedstock quality and environmental impacts? Comparison of different biochar production systems BSI system Oregon Kiln Air burners

LCA of Biochar What environmental impacts are we looking at? Energy consumption Emissions generated? (eg. CO, CO 2, particulates, NOx, CH 4, SO 2 ) Impact categories such as: Global Warming Potential (GWP), Ozone Depletion Potential Smog Potential

LCA Method Life cycle inventory

LCA of Biochar Functional Unit 1 mt of Biochar Cradle to gate (collection through production) Life cycle data Forestry operations, feedstock collection, feedstock processing, and transportation (from Oneil, Waste to Wisdom PI) Biochar production runs were performed by engineers at the Schatz Energy Center (Humboldt State U.) US LCI database Calculations

LCA System Boundary In Forest Operations (felling, yarding, loading/hauling biomass) Sorting/Processing Pulp logs Sorting/Processing Branches and Tops Loading Grinder BCT site @ remote location Loading Chipper Screening BCT site @ remote location Biomass Electricity - Power Pallet Electricity - Diesel generator Propane Biochar Production (BSI) Biochar Ash Emissions Heat

Forestry Operations

Biochar Production - BSI System Testing Goals Develop feedstock quality specifications Measure consumption and production rates Document operational intensity and labor requirements Determine energy requirements Assess environmental impact and fire hazards Work credit: David Carter, and Mark Severy

LCA System Boundary In Forest Operations (felling, yarding, loading/hauling biomass) Sorting/Processing Pulp logs Sorting/Processing Branches and Tops Loading Grinder BCT site @ remote location Loading Chipper Screening BCT site @ remote location Biomass Electricity - Power Pallet Electricity - Diesel generator Propane Biochar Production (BSI) Biochar Ash Emissions Heat

Feedstocks LCA feedstock criteria < 25% MC wb <15% ash

Feedstocks Chip med Chip small X X X

Results - Power Pallet 1 mton of Biochar 56%

Results Power Pallet - 1 mton of Fixed Carbon 22%

Results-Diesel Generator- 1 mton of Biochar 77%

Results-Diesel Generator-1 mton of Fixed Carbon 39%

Conclusions - LCA of Biochar Relationship between biochar quality and CO 2 emissions Biochar Production (BSI): Feedstock should have <25% MC wb and <15% ash

Conclusions - LCA of Biochar 63-70% Power Pallet (small gasification generator used to power the biochar machine and/or the drying system) reduced overall kg CO2 eq (GWP) emissions by 63-70% over use of a diesel generator, depending on the feedstock used.

Conclusions - LCA of Biochar Does quality come with an environmental cost? Biochar equivalent output - higher quality biochar resulted in a higher GWP impacts When the impact was scaled to a ton of fixed carbon the differences in overall impact based on biochar quality was reduced Lower biochar quality had the highest environmental cost.

Conclusions Next steps Setting standards for biochar (% fixed carbon) What amount of environmental impact are we willing to accept for biochar quality? What is an acceptable quality of feedstock and biochar to make the production process a carbon benefit Do other impacts categories respond to biochar quality like GWP? Impact of taking the forest residues (feedstocks) to town for processing? Other biochar production systems (eg. Oregon Kiln, Air Burners)?

The Economics of Near-Forest Woody Biomass Biochar Manufacture E.M. (Ted) Bilek Economist USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory p. 608-231-9507 tbilek@fs.fed.us www.fs.fed.us

Biochar Integrated System Design» Produced 75 kg/hr of biochar with no external inputs.» System can be operated by one person. 389 kg/hr @ 22% 495 kg/hr @ 36% 6.6 kw electric Biochar Machine 42 kw thermal 2.7 kw electric Dryer 75 kg/hr biochar 410 kg/hr @ 22% Gasifier 21 kg/hr @ 22%

Biochar Integrated System Design» Dry biomass with waste heat» Provide electricity with gasifier generator set Biomass In Gasifier Generator Biochar Machine Belt Dryer Biochar Out

Biochar Integrated System Design» Dry biomass with waste heat» Provide electricity with gasifier generator set Biomass In Gasifier Generator Biochar Machine Belt Dryer Biochar Out Ladder Fuels

Biochar Integrated System Design» Dry biomass with waste heat» Provide electricity with gasifier generator set Biomass In Gasifier Generator Biochar Machine Belt Dryer Biochar Out

Economics outline» Biochar overview and system logic;» Analysis methodology;» Results;» Conclusions.

What to use to make biochar? Preferably, a feedstock without much variation wood chips (<3/4 inch) micro-chips (<1/4 inch) sawdust (<5/32 inch)

Biochar-ready feedstock production costs Sawdust machine (Beaver Korea) (Gu)estimated machine rate = $12.80/BDT (w/loader) Productivity = BDT/PMH (23.8 BDT/PMH Biochar feedstock input is 0.50 BDT/PMH Microchipper (Peterson 4300): Machine rate = $13.12/BDT (w/loader) Productivity = 33.85 BDT/PMH

Basic biochar production assumptions:» Commercial-scale system cost: $489,500 (120 tons/year)» Biochar unit: Biochar Solutions machines @ $250,000 & $400,000» Dryer: Norris Thermal Technologies Belt-o-matic 123B @ $45,000» Economic life: 10 years (8 hours/day, 250 days/year)» Salvage value: 20%» Feedstock throughputs: 0.354 & 0.502 BDT/PMH» Biochar mass conversion = 13.5% & 15.9%» Operation = 2,500 SMH @ 80% productivity» Feedstock = Microchips @ $13.12/BDT (= $8.43/green ton, including loader, but not transport)

Other important assumptions:» Electricity supply: PowerPallet (PP20) gasifier genset from All Power Labs @ $0.3869/kWh also provides drying heat» Loader cost @ $22.57/SMH (machine cost calculation w/o labor)» Discount rate: 10% (pre-tax nominal w/ cost & revenue inflation @ 1% & 0% respectively)» Product value: $2,000/BDT, FOB plant» Tax losses are: recognized immediately (not carried forward or lost)» Loan = 40% of initial capital cost» Loan terms: 6 years at 6.00% with monthly payments

Methodology: Discounted Cash Flow Analysis BASIC ASSUMPTIONS Overall project assumptions Variable operating costs Note: all costs and revenues are in Year 0 dollars. Project planning life 10 years Plant operators 1.00 Standard operating days/year 250 Variable labor cost ($/worker/scheduled hour) $ 33.25 Scheduled daily machine operating hours (daily SMH) 8.0 Electricity cost ($/kwh) $ 0.3869 Cost inflation rate 1.0% Binder cost ($/lb) $ - Revenue inflation rate 0.0% Standardized repairs & maintenance percentage 20.0% Repairs & maintenance function Uniform Project financing Liquid propane ($/gallon) $ 2.39 Required mininum nominal pre-tax risk premium on invested capital 8.5% Periodic consumables cost Deposit interest rate (APR) 1.50% Periodic consumables life 2,000 hours Initial gearing (% of total start-up cost that is financed) 40.0% Periodic consumables installation factor 0% Loan interest rate (APR) 6.00% Additional periodic consumables cost Loan term 6.00 years Additional periodic consumables life 2,000 hours Loan and deposit payments per year 12 Misc. variable operating costs ($/scheduled hr.) $ 22.570 Working capital required as a percentage of next year's sales 2.0% Other variable consumables cost ($/ton biochar $ - Finished goods transport cost ($/ton) $ - Capital assets Deperciation code DB Conversion variables Terminal asset value multiplier 100% Biochar system feedstock throughput (bone-dry tons/pmh) 0.50 Biochar system mass conversion/bone-dry ton of feedstock (%) 15.9% Fixed operating costs Feedstock removal (bone-dry tons/acre) 18.00 General administration ($/year) $ 2,000 Electrical energy required 9 kw Administration staff (number) - Binder required (lb/biochar ton) - Administration staff salaries ($/person/year) $ 80,000 Liquid propane (gallons/productive hour) - Site lease ($/year) $ - Thermal production (million Btu/Bone-dry ton feedstock throughput) 2.94 Equipment lease ($/year) $ - Feedstock moisture content 35.8% Annual insurance percent 1.6% System start-up time (hours/day) 1.21 Other annual fixed costs ($/year) $ - System shut-down time (hours/day) 0.79 Taxes Income tax rate 40.0% Tax losses or net tax credits are recognized immediately Biomass utilization tax credit $ - Biomass utilization tax credit is per ton bone-dry Biomass utilization tax credit extends for 3 years Biomass utilization tax credit is inflation-adjusted (Yes/No) No Ad valorem (property) tax mill rate - Ad valorem (property) tax valuation basis ACI

Demonstration-scale Results (72 tons/year) (w/product price = $2,000/BDT) Summary Financial Measures: Before-finance Semi-mobile Biochar Conversion System from Biochar Solutions & tax Before-tax After-tax NPV ($000) $ (351) $ (338) $ (210) Real IRR (adjusted by cost inflation at 1.0%) -21.4% -26.2% -17.3% Nominal IRR -20.6% -25.5% -16.4% NOT E: Nominal discount rates used to calculate NPVs and B-E values 10.00% 8.40% 5.04% (Assuming 1.0% cost inflation, 0.0% revenue inflation, and 40.0% gearing at 6.00%) IRR seed = -50% Break-even avg. Biochar product value ($/ton) $ 2,839 $ 2,750 $ 2,662 Break-even delivered yr. 1 feedstock cost ($/green ton) $ (62) $ (54) $ (47) Medium-term operating B-E avg. product value ($/ton) $ 2,171 Short-term operating B-E avg. product value ($/ton) $ 2,040

Demonstration-scale Results (72 tons/year) (w/product price = $2,000/BDT) Summary Financial Measures: Before-finance Semi-mobile Biochar Conversion System from Biochar Solutions & tax Before-tax After-tax NPV ($000) $ (351) $ (338) $ (210) Real IRR (adjusted by cost inflation at 1.0%) -21.4% -26.2% -17.3% Nominal IRR -20.6% -25.5% -16.4% NOT E: Nominal discount rates used to calculate NPVs and B-E values 10.00% 8.40% 5.04% (Assuming 1.0% cost inflation, 0.0% revenue inflation, and 40.0% gearing at 6.00%) IRR seed = -50% Break-even avg. Biochar product value ($/ton) $ 2,839 $ 2,750 $ 2,662 Break-even delivered yr. 1 feedstock cost ($/green ton) $ (62) $ (54) $ (47) Medium-term operating B-E avg. product value ($/ton) $ 2,171 Short-term operating B-E avg. product value ($/ton) $ 2,040 For-profit biochar production at a demonstration scale (72 tons/year) is not recommended without additional capital or operating subsidies.

Demonstration-scale Results (72 tons/year) (w/product price = $2,000/BDT) Summary Financial Measures: Before-finance Semi-mobile Biochar Conversion System from Biochar Solutions & tax Before-tax After-tax NPV ($000) $ (351) $ (338) $ (210) Real IRR (adjusted by cost inflation at 1.0%) -21.4% -26.2% -17.3% Nominal IRR -20.6% -25.5% -16.4% NOT E: Nominal discount rates used to calculate NPVs and B-E values 10.00% 8.40% 5.04% (Assuming 1.0% cost inflation, 0.0% revenue inflation, and 40.0% gearing at 6.00%) IRR seed = -50% Break-even avg. Biochar product value ($/ton) $ 2,839 $ 2,750 $ 2,662 Break-even delivered yr. 1 feedstock cost ($/green ton) $ (62) $ (54) $ (47) Medium-term operating B-E avg. product value ($/ton) $ 2,171 Short-term operating B-E avg. product value ($/ton) $ 2,040 Break-even product values are the prices at which NPVs=$0

Demonstration-scale Results (72 tons/year) (w/product price = $2,000/BDT) Summary Financial Measures: Before-finance Semi-mobile Biochar Conversion System from Biochar Solutions & tax Before-tax After-tax NPV ($000) $ (351) $ (338) $ (210) Real IRR (adjusted by cost inflation at 1.0%) -21.4% -26.2% -17.3% Nominal IRR -20.6% -25.5% -16.4% NOT E: Nominal discount rates used to calculate NPVs and B-E values 10.00% 8.40% 5.04% (Assuming 1.0% cost inflation, 0.0% revenue inflation, and 40.0% gearing at 6.00%) IRR seed = -50% Break-even avg. Biochar product value ($/ton) $ 2,839 $ 2,750 $ 2,662 Break-even delivered yr. 1 feedstock cost ($/green ton) $ (62) $ (54) $ (47) Medium-term operating B-E avg. product value ($/ton) $ 2,171 Short-term operating B-E avg. product value ($/ton) $ 2,040 Break-even product values are the prices at which NPVs=$0 Break-even feedstock costs are the costs (or subsidies) at which NPVs=$0

Demonstration-scale Results (72 tons/year) (w/product price = $2,000/BDT) Summary Financial Measures: Before-finance Semi-mobile Biochar Conversion System from Biochar Solutions & tax Before-tax After-tax NPV ($000) $ (351) $ (338) $ (210) Real IRR (adjusted by cost inflation at 1.0%) -21.4% -26.2% -17.3% Nominal IRR -20.6% -25.5% -16.4% NOT E: Nominal discount rates used to calculate NPVs and B-E values 10.00% 8.40% 5.04% (Assuming 1.0% cost inflation, 0.0% revenue inflation, and 40.0% gearing at 6.00%) IRR seed = -50% Break-even avg. Biochar product value ($/ton) $ 2,839 $ 2,750 $ 2,662 Break-even delivered yr. 1 feedstock cost ($/green ton) $ (62) $ (54) $ (47) Medium-term operating B-E avg. product value ($/ton) $ 2,171 Short-term operating B-E avg. product value ($/ton) $ 2,040 Break-even product values are the prices at which NPVs=$0 Break-even feedstock costs are the costs (or subsidies) at which NPVs=$0 Medium and short-term product values will keep the plant open either for the next year or for the next day.

Commercial-scale Results (120 tons/year) (w/product price = $2,000/BDT) Summary Financial Measures: Before-finance Semi-mobile Biochar Conversion System from Biochar Solutions & tax Before-tax After-tax NPV ($000) $ 8 $ 68 $ 90 Real IRR (adjusted by cost inflation at 1.0%) 9.2% 10.8% 8.8% Nominal IRR 10.3% 11.9% 9.9% NOT E: Nominal discount rates used to calculate NPVs and B-E values 10.00% 8.40% 5.04% (Assuming 1.0% cost inflation, 0.0% revenue inflation, and 40.0% gearing at 6.00%) IRR seed = -50% Break-even avg. Biochar product value ($/ton) $ 1,989 $ 1,910 $ 1,831 Break-even delivered yr. 1 feedstock cost ($/green ton) $ 10 $ 17 $ 25 Medium-term operating B-E avg. product value ($/ton) $ 1,384 Short-term operating B-E avg. product value ($/ton) $ 1,277 NPVs are positive and nominal IRRs are all above the discount rates;

Commercial-scale Results (120 tons/year) (w/product price = $2,000/BDT) Summary Financial Measures: Before-finance Semi-mobile Biochar Conversion System from Biochar Solutions & tax Before-tax After-tax NPV ($000) $ 8 $ 68 $ 90 Real IRR (adjusted by cost inflation at 1.0%) 9.2% 10.8% 8.8% Nominal IRR 10.3% 11.9% 9.9% NOT E: Nominal discount rates used to calculate NPVs and B-E values 10.00% 8.40% 5.04% (Assuming 1.0% cost inflation, 0.0% revenue inflation, and 40.0% gearing at 6.00%) IRR seed = -50% Break-even avg. Biochar product value ($/ton) $ 1,989 $ 1,910 $ 1,831 Break-even delivered yr. 1 feedstock cost ($/green ton) $ 10 $ 17 $ 25 Medium-term operating B-E avg. product value ($/ton) $ 1,384 Short-term operating B-E avg. product value ($/ton) $ 1,277 NPVs are positive and nominal IRRs are all above the discount rates; Break-even product values are below the target price. Feedstock prices are positive.

Cost breakdown: Before-finance & tax 3.1% Variable costs 2.4% 30.8% 32.7% 64.2% 26.8% 4.3% 0.0% Capital assets (dryer & biochar reactor) Wood feedstock (@ $8.43/green ton) Labor (1 operator(s) @ $33.25/worker/scheduled hour) Electricity (@ $0.3869/kWh) Other variable operating costs Fixed operating costs & working capital Total costs discounted at 10.00% nominal before-finance & tax over 10 years with variable costs highlighted NOTE: Total annualized costs = $226,595 and total annualized revenues = $227,895

Biochar plant s simple sensitivity analysis

NPV after tax ($000) Biochar plant s profitability sensitivity to the operating day length $2,000 $1,500 $1,000 $500 $- $(500) $(1,000) 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 Daily scheduled machine hours (SMH/day) Sensitivity of Biochar Plant's NPV after tax to the Standard operating day (scheduled hours/day) NOTE: NPV after-tax discount factor is 4.00% real, or 5.04% nominal with 1.00% cost inflation

NPV after tax ($000) Biochar plant s profitability sensitivity to the project planning life $100 $80 $60 $40 $20 $- $(20) $(40) $(60) $(80) $(100) 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Project planning life (years) Sensitivity of Biochar Plant's NPV after tax to the Project planning life (years) NOTE: NPV after-tax discount factor is 4.00% real, or 5.04% nominal with 1.00% cost inflation

Economic Drivers Alternative disposal costs Pile burn ($150-$850/acre) Torrefaction (value = $200-$250/ton delivered) Other energy Markets

Biochar Markets» Soils (primary market)» Need to match specific biochars to crops and soil types» Biggest potential lies where crops are higher-valued, especially where water is scarce or costly» Even larger value-added potential lies in possible replacement for activated carbon (esp. trace mercury removal or soil decontamination, water or air filtration, public health/sanitation, etc.)» Composting (can reduce composting time, GHG emissions, and odors)» Growing media (i.e. vermiculite and perlite and peat moss substitutes)» Other bio-based wastes can also be made into biochar» Chicken & egg issues with respect to biochar s costeffectiveneness (which lead to financing issues which limit scale economies)» Carbon sequestration

Conclusions» Small-scale near-woods biochar production may make economic sense.» Costs are relatively high;» Labor is a big part of the total cost.» Costs as presented could be lowered.» Biochar represents a highly value-added product made from waste resources. It can be used directly and offers the opportunity to be combined with other ingredients to create additional value. It can be produced near a forest and offers opportunities to concentrate biomass value to facilitate more cost-effective transport.

Conclusions» Small-scale near-woods biochar production may make economic sense.» Costs are relatively high;» Labor is a big part of the total cost.» Costs as presented could be lowered.» Biochar represents a highly value-added product made from waste resources. It can be used directly and offers the opportunity to be combined with other ingredients to create additional value. It can be produced near a forest and offers opportunities to concentrate biomass value to facilitate more cost-effective transport.

More research is needed.

Thank You Questions? Webinar Info at: http://www.wastetowisdom.com/webinars/ General Contact Info at: http://www.wastetowisdom.com/contact-us/ Debbie Page-Dumroese. Research Soil Scientist USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station Moscow, ID ddumroese@fs.fed.us E.M. (Ted) Bilek, Ph.D. Economist USDA Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI tbilek@fs.fed.us Maureen Puettmann Forestry Consultant WoodLife Environmental Consultants Corvallis, OR maureen.puettmann@woodlifeconsulting.com 57