Regional Planning Process Task Force Meeting Teleconference - Toll-free call-in number Passcode:

Similar documents
Minutes. Manager, NERC and Regional Coordination Dept. Sr. Compliance Specialist, NERC and Regional Coordination Dept. Appalachian Power Company

Wes Yeomans Vice President Operations Management Committee May 31, 2017 COPYRIGHT NYISO ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Public Policy and Multi-Driver Projects. RPPTF August 10, 2012

2750 Monroe Blvd Audubon, PA

Section 3 Characteristics of Credits Types of units. Economic Noneconomic Generation.

SCHEDULE 12 Transmission Enhancement Charges. Establishment of Transmission Enhancement Charges.

Regional Cooperation of US States on Electric Transmission Issues

ILL. C. C. No. 10 Commonwealth ELECTRICITY 5th Revised Sheet No. 125 Edison Company (Canceling 4th Revised Sheet No. 125) GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS

PJM Transmission Replacement Processes Senior Task Force COST ALLOCATION & COST RECOVERY Educational Session. June 3, 2016

Open Access Transmission Tariff ATTACHMENT K

MISO SPP Interregional Stakeholder Advisory Committee. April 8 th, 2014 Carmel, IN

Fundamentals of Transmission Operations

Coordination among OPSI Members: Assuring Reliability and Security of Supply

Con Ed/PSEG Wheel Replacement Proposal A joint white paper from the New York Independent System Operator and PJM Interconnection

MARKET EFFICIENCY STUDY PROCESS AND PROJECT EVALUATION TRAINING

Transmission Planning at the Midwest ISO. Mr. Eric Laverty Senior Manager of Transmission Access Planning Midwest ISO June 26 th, 2008

Joint and Common Market ITEM 4 PSEUDO TIES

Dispatch Signal & Locational Marginal Pricing (LMP)

SPP at a Glance. Located in Little Rock. Approximately 600 employees

ATTACHMENT K TRANSMISSION PLANNING PROCESS

Results and Assumptions For Single Economic Dispatch Production Cost Study PROMOD Component

INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATORS (VI + Access Rules vs. ISO vs. ITSO)

Section 5: Network Integration Transmission Service Accounting. 5.1 Network Integration Transmission Service Accounting Overview

ICAP Governance Framework

The Polar Vortex and Future Power System Trends National Coal Council Annual Spring Meeting May 14, 2014

Guidelines for Observers for open plenary meetings

Industry Webinar. Project Geomagnetic Disturbance Mitigation. Frank Koza, PJM Interconnection July 27, 2017

PEAK DEMAND REDUCTION STRATEGY

Local Market Power Mitigation Options Under Convergence Bidding

NERC ATC/TTC/CBM/TRM Standards Drafting Team. August 7 9, a.m. 5 p.m. Pacific Daylight Time. BPA Headquarters Offices Portland, Oregon

The Virtues of A Virtual RTO

Energy Market Uplift Sr. Task Force Update

TODAY S ORGANIZED MARKETS A STEP TOWARD COMPETITION OR AN EXERCISE IN RE-REGULATION?

Business Practice Manual for The Transmission Planning Process

The ESP Handbook. Chapter 9 Billing under CCA. Version 2.0 May 1, 2015

Congestion Assessment and Resource Integration Studies. A Report by the New York Independent System Operator

Meeting Minutes. 1. Mr. Richard Brown opened the meeting and reviewed the agenda.

Lowering Prices by Raising Costs: Market Rule Responses to Sponsored Entry. Chantale LaCasse, NERA

Using Employee Resource Groups to Increase Diversity

OVERVIEW OF ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE STUDIES

3. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ISO AND PARTICIPATING TOs. Each Participating TO shall enter into a Transmission Control Agreement with the

ISO New England - ISO New England Inc. Transmission, Markets and Services Tariff

External Document Links

THE INTERNAL REGULATIONS OF THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF THE KINGDOM OF CAMBODIA CHAPTER 1. Provisional Office and Duty

Regional Flexibility Markets

STANDARDS OF CONDUCT IMPLEMENTATION AND COMPLIANCE. Standards of Conduct for Transmission Providers Pursuant to FERC Order No. 717

Locational Marginal Pricing II: Unlocking the Mystery

Periodic Review Template INT Implementation of Interchange

Incremental Black Start RFP Response Template & General Information

Adopted June 22, 2017

Transmission Expansion Advisory Committee Market Efficiency Update

BOARD STANDING COMMITTEE CHARTER

SPP RE Regional Reliability Standards Development Process Manual

PJM Interconnection Economic Analysis of the EPA Clean Power Plan Proposal

PJM Manual 27: Open Access Transmission Tariff Accounting Revision: 88 Effective Date: November 16, 2017

Capacity Market. Overview RPM Capacity Market. Market Design

Transmission Expansion and Interconnection Manual. June 2017

WISCONSIN PUBLIC SERVICE CORPORATION. P.S.C.W. Volume No. 7 1st Rev. Sheet No. E7.00 Replaces Original Sheet No. E7.00

PJM Manual 29: Billing. Revision: 23 Effective Date: January 1, Prepared by Strategic Market Services Department

The meeting opened at 1:00 p.m., with 10 members of the Committee in attendance.

Sustaining & Enhancing Reliability in NY

Standard Development Timeline

PJM PROMOD Overview. August 1, PJM

Welcome to New Member Orientation We will begin shortly.

Carbonite Online Backup

Transmission Expansion Advisory Committee. Reliability Analysis Update

Responsible Down Standard International Working Group. September 13, 2017

Problems in the Organized Markets

The following members of the Market Surveillance Committee were in attendance: BRIEFING ON REACTIVE POWER REQUIREMENTS AND FINANCIAL COMPENSATION

BEST PRACTICES FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES

Schedule 9 and 10 PJM /23/2017

CUSTOMER GUIDE TO PJM BILLING

Modeling Transmission Outages in the CRR Network Model

Robert s Rules Cheat Sheet

MEMORANDUM DEBBIE MALICOAT, DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES

2018 Draft Policy Initiatives Roadmap. Market and Infrastructure Policy December 7, 2017

Data Viewer, Member Voting, Account Manager, DR Hub, Power Meter, and Data Miner Roadmaps

Small Generator Interconnection Procedures (SGIP) Customer Guide

Request for Quotation For Basic Security Management Trainings

BILLING CODE P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. 18 CFR Part 40. [Docket No. RM ; Order No.

STANDARDS OF CONDUCT IMPLEMENTATION AND COMPLIANCE. Standards of Conduct for Transmission Providers Pursuant to FERC Order No. 717

U.P. Transmission Business Briefing Planning Update. November 29, 2007 Marquette, MI Flora Flygt, Director of Planning

California Independent System Operator Corporation Fifth Replacement Electronic Tariff

CSTF Poll Feedback. 02 June 2014

Southern California Edison Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No.

MISO-PJM Interface Pricing Post Implementation Metrics and Criteria

Rate Design and Resource Planning

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Sponsor & Exhibitor Opportunities

ATTACHMENT P. Transmission Planning Process

OVERVIEW OF REGIONAL ELECTRICITY MARKET INITIATIVES IN THE U.S.

Modeling the Restructured Illinois Electricity Market as a Complex Adaptive System

Review Transmission Access Charge Structure. Straw Proposal

New Higg.org Platform Training. Understanding and Navigating the new platform

DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES PROPOSED STRAWMAN PROPOSAL IN RESPONSE TO ORDER 890

PSE&G/ConEd Wheel Modeling

Local Market Power Mitigation Enhancements

A Toolkit for Establishing and Maintaining Successful Employee Resource Groups

BOARD STANDING COMMITTEE CHARTER

Transcription:

Regional Planning Process Task Force Meeting Teleconference - Toll-free call-in number 866-398-2885 Passcode: 934672. WebEx Link: https://pjm.webex.com Password: rpp0424pjm April 24, 2013 1:00 p.m., Eastern Standard Time

Agenda Call to Order, Announcements, Roll call, 20 min Review Action Items Market Efficiency (ME) 40 min Resumption of Consideration & Refresher of Last Status Voting Information - Draft Presentation to prepare for voting on ME FERC Order on Order 1000 Compliance Filings 60 min Compliance Tasks for Order 1000 (please see separate spreadsheet work paper) Upgrade Definition Discussion (Time Permitting) Action Items, RPPTF Tasks and Schedule, Conclude meeting 10 min 2

Action Items - Status # Owner Status Date Opened Date Closed Item Administration Market Efficiency 3 PJM Closed 18-Apr 24-Apr Interregional Coordination Resumption of ME Consideration - share last status after polling Multi-Driver Approach 8 PJM Open 14-Mar Provide review on two Hybrid "con's" (notated in deck) 9 Ron Chu Open 18-Apr Share precedents regarding "special" cases Filings/FERC Orders 3 PJM Closed 18-Apr 24-Apr 4 RPPTF Stakeholders Open 18-Apr Ensure Standing Agenda Item for order 1000 updates regarding PJM response to Compliance Items Share Stakeholder's identification of "significant items" on Order 1000 task list 3

Action Item #9 Multi-Driver Share precedents regarding "special" cases http://www.leagle.com/xmlresult.aspx?xmldoc=19931340636ne2d704_11286.xml&docbase=cslwar2-1986-2006 The City of Chicago (City) appeals from an order of the Illinois Commerce Commission (Commission) approving with modification Commonwealth Edison Company's (Edison) proposed Rider 28 Local Government Compliance Clause. In general, Rider 28 directs Edison to recover the marginal costs of providing "non-standard" service from customers within any governmental unit that mandates such service. Currently any additional costs associated with mandated nonstandard service are recovered from all Edison consumers as a component of Edison's base electricity rates. Rider 28 would, for example, add a line-item charge, based upon kilowatt hours of electricity used, to the bill of any consumer who resides in a municipality that requires power lines to be buried, rather than suspended from poles. Researcher s Note: Rider 28 was approved before industry restructuring and when the subject utility had a bundled rate. This is an one-off situation and may or may not apply in today s world. Subject should undergo further legal and regulatory research. 4

RPPTF Market Efficiency Resumption of Consideration & Voting Information

Market Efficiency Voting Market Efficiency Changes - Recommendations to MRC Vote required to determine main motion at MRC Package with highest majority > 50% becomes main motion at MRC Remaining option(s) with majority > 50% become minor motions Benefit Determination Vote (May support both options): 1. Can you support changing the Benefit Determination to Package 4? 2. Can you support changing the Benefit Determination to Package 10? Generation Expansion Vote (May support all options): 1. Can you support changing the method for future generation modeling to include option D (A+D)? 2. Can you support changing the method for future generation modeling to options B+D? 3. Can you support changing the method for future generation modeling to options D+G? 6

Market Efficiency- Benefit Determination Final Packages for Vote Package 4 Description Regional Energy Benefit: 50% change in production costs + 50% change in net load payments all zones. Regional Capacity Benefit: 50% change in capacity costs + 50% change in net capacity payments all zones. Lower Voltage Energy Benefit: 50% change in production costs + 50% change in net load payments for zones with decrease in net load payments. Lower Voltage Capacity Benefit: 50% change in capacity costs + 50% change in net capacity payment for zones with decrease in net capacity payments. Package 10 Description Regional Energy Benefit: 50% change in production costs + 50% change in net load payments for zones with decrease in net load payments. Regional Capacity Benefit: 50% change in capacity costs + 50% change in net capacity payment for zones with decrease in net capacity payments. Lower Voltage Energy Benefit: 100% change in net load payments for zones with decrease in net load payments. Lower Voltage Capacity Benefit: 100% change in net capacity payment for zones with decrease in net capacity payments. 7

Market Efficiency- Benefit Determination Final Packages for Vote 8

Market Efficiency- Generation Expansion Final Packages for Vote Design Elements A+D Design Element A (Status Quo): Include all ISA. Scale existing units based on location and technology to meet Reserve Requirement Design Element D: Include actual transmission upgrades for congestion that arises from scaling assumptions. Design Elements B+D (PJM Recommended) Design Element B: Include all ISA and FSA. Scale existing units based on location and technology to meet Reserve Requirement. Review of FSA units for exceptions. Design Element D: Include actual transmission upgrades for congestion that arises from scaling assumptions. Design Elements D+G Design Element D: Include actual transmission upgrades for congestion that arises from scaling assumptions. Design Element G: Include all ISA. Add units on HV system based on location and technology to meet Reserve Requirement. 9

Design Element B - Generation Expansion - FSA units Permit PJM to remove select FSA units from Market Efficiency analysis Reduces modeling error due to completion, technological or timing risks resulting from large generation (e.g. nuclear generation station) or FSArelated transmission ( 500kV) projects Remove FSA units that are suspended or with announced retirements Review with Stakeholders final Market Efficiency model changes for FSA units 10

Production Cost Definition Change Productions Costs definition change (Reviewed with no objections at December RPPTF) Production Costs definition: Estimated total annual fuel costs, variable O&M costs, and emission costs of the dispatched resources in the PJM Region. Costs for purchases from outside of the PJM area and sales to outside the PJM area will be captured if appropriate. Purchases will be valued at the Load Weighted LMP and sales will be valued at the Generation Weighted LMP. Consensus Achieved at December RPPTF Meeting. Re-Confirm Tier 1 Consensus 11

FERC Order 1000 Compliance Tasks for Order 1000 (please see separate spreadsheet work paper) 12

FERC Order 1000 Time Permitting Engage in discussion on definition of upgrade 13

PJM Notices Anti-trust: You may not discuss any topics that violate, or that might appear to violate, the antitrust laws including but not limited to agreements between or among competitors regarding prices, bid and offer practices, availability of service, product design, terms of sale, division of markets, allocation of customers or any other activity that might unreasonably restrain competition. If any of these items are discussed the chair will re-direct the conversation. If the conversation still persists, parties will be asked to leave the meeting or the meeting will be adjourned. Code of Conduct: As a mandatory condition of attendance at today's meeting, attendees agree to adhere to the PJM Code of Conduct as detailed in PJM Manual M-34 section 4.5, including, but not limited to, participants' responsibilities and rules regarding the dissemination of meeting discussion and materials. Public Meetings/Media Participation: Unless otherwise noted, PJM stakeholder meetings are open to the public and to members of the media. Members of the media are asked to announce their attendance at all PJM stakeholder meetings at the beginning of the meeting or at the point they join a meeting already in progress. Members of the Media are reminded that speakers at PJM meetings cannot be quoted without explicit permission from the speaker. PJM Members are reminded that "detailed transcriptional meeting notes" and white board notes from "brainstorming sessions" shall not be disseminated. Stakeholders are also not allowed to create audio, video or online recordings of PJM meetings. 14