Design of Temporary Excavation and Lateral Support System for the DSD Sheung Wan Stormwater Pumping Station

Similar documents
PIANC UK Seminar Design Developments and Specification for Steel. Duncan Nicholson Arup Fellow 9/3/17 ICE London

Case study of deep excavation in existing underground structure of three-story basement and diaphragm wall

1.364 ADVANCED GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING HOMEWORK No. 5

Northport Berth 3 design and construction monitoring

Combined Pile Foundation System for a Residential Complex

Behaviour of Various Support Systems for Deep Excavations, Changi Airport Underground MRT Station

1. All underground utilities under railroad tracks shall be encased in a larger pipe or conduit called the casing pipe.

Performance review of a pipe jacking project in Hong Kong

ROTARY DRILLING TECHNIQUES LARGE DIAMETER

UNDERPINNING A CRANE FOUNDATION

NPTEL Course GROUND IMPROVEMENT USING MICROPILES

DIAPHRAGM WALLS, CUT-OFF WALLS AND SLURRY WALLS

paterson -MEMO consulting engineers

Jet Grouting to Increase Lateral Resistance of Pile Group in Soft Clay

A Case Study: Foundation Design in Liquefiable Site

USE OF DIPP PILES FOR A NEW SUP BRIDGE IN WEST MELBOURNE

GROUND IMPROVEMENT SITE INVESTIGATON

Challenges in Design and Construction of Deep Excavation With Case Studies - KVMRT in KL Limestone

SEMINAR. Introduction to Continuous Flight Auger (CFA) piling Thursday 21/8/2013. Facilitator: Martin Larisch

Diaphragm wall Construction

LARGE DIAMETER PIPE ROOF BOX EXCAVATION FOR PASSENGER LINKWAY TUNNEL

Marina Bay Sands Hotel Arch 631 Kayla Brittany Maria Michelle

SITE INVESTIGATION. Foundation Engineering

Walls generally range from 600 to 1500 mm thickness, in wide between 2000 and 3500 mm and can be excavated to depths of 60m or more.

SECTION XXXXX AGGREGATE PIERS PART 1 - GENERAL

A DSM WALL FOR EXCAVATION SUPPORT

Subsurface Investigations PDCA Professor s Driven Pile Institute. Loren R. Anderson Utah State University June 25, 2015

Case Studies on Soil Nailed Retaining Systems for Deep Excavations

Pipe Jacking/Microtunnelling. Dr. Mark Knight. Centre for Advancement of Trenchless Technologies (CATT) University of Waterloo.

GeoEng2000 An International Conference on Geotechnical & Geological Engineering

SECTION DUCTILE IRON PILES

Application of Stress-Wave Theory to Piles

Scott Hockly. Environmental Management of an Inner City Roading Project

Topic: Site Formation

Application of Vibro Techniques for Infrastructure Projects in India

Shafts for Urban Underground Works

Piling & Contaminated Land. Dr Derek Egan Technical Director Keller Ltd

Experimental Load Transfer of Piles Subject to Lateral Soil Movement

PAUL ZICK, PE NORTH SHORE CONSTRUCTORS JV

Steven Dapp, Ph.D., P.E. Steven Dapp, Ph.D., P.E. Dan Brown and Associates

TRENCHLESS CONSTRUCTION (BORING, JACKING, AND TUNNELING)

Oweninny Wind Farm. Oweninny Environmental Impact Statement Appendix 5. Turbine Foundation Construction Method Statement

Geotechnical control of a major railway project involving tunnel works in Hong Kong

Performance of Drained and Undrained Flexible Pavement. Structures under Wet Conditions. Accelerated Test Data. Test Section 544 Undrained

Wet Speed-Mixing WSM - Soil Mixing Procedure in Twinmix Design

Deformation Behaviour of a Retaining Wall for a Deep Basement Excavation with Semi-Top Down Method

LOAD CAPACITY OF AUGER DISPLACEMENT PILES

CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER (CFA) PILES QC/QA PROCEDURES. Preferred QC/QA Procedures

Observations and Performance of a Soil Nail Shoring Wall in Seattle Silts and Clays

Case study on a deep excavation in Baku: Flame Towers project earth retaining system

7. Draw an equipment set up for the production of a beam by post tensioning. 10. What are the common concrete structures which are produced by

Temporary Structures. Excavations and Excavation Supports

Drilled Shaft. Inspection. HQ Construction Office HQ Geotechnical Division

Ground Improvement. Martin G. Taube, P.E., P.G. February 4, 2003

STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS SECTION BORING AND JACKING. A. Section includes requirements for boring and jacking casing pipe.

1. Introduction Selection of Pile Type Soil Report / Boreholes Obstructions Design and Installation of Piling Mat 3

Schnabel Foundation Company

ASSESSMENT AND MITIGATION OF LIQUEFACTION RISK FOR EXISTING BUILDING FOUNDATION

Advantages / Disadvantages of Piling Methods. Continuous Flight Auger (CFA)

File No Supplemental November Geotechnical and Environmental Consulting Engineers

VERIFICATION OF GEOTECHNICAL GROUTING- STRATEGIES AND PLANNING. Michael J. Byle, D.GE, F. ASCE

Stage 4 Geotechnical Investigations Information Sheet

RIGID INCLUSIONS. Rigid Inclusions offer an economical approach for building on sites underlain by soft soil.

13/05/2016. Introductions of Pipe Roof. Focuses. Application of Rectangular Shield Jacking

Learning Outcomes. Background Definitions. Lesson 2 & 3. Definitions, Background, Classification, Applications and Costs

Conventional Field Testing Methods and Issues

Building pit District adjacent to St.Katharinenkirche Hamburg, Germany

CONSTRUCTION OF TWO MICROTUNNEL ACCESS SHAFTS USING THE CUTTER SOIL MIX (CSM) METHOD IN THE SAN JOAQUIN DELTA, CALIFORNIA

SCOPE OF WORK FOR PILING JOB

CF50/100 KW TURBINE ACCESS ROAD, CRANE PLATFORM, CONCRETE, AND LIFTING SPECIFICATIONS C&F GREEN ENERGY REVISION PREPARED BY APPROVED BY DATE

The influence of large scale inhomogeneities on a construction dewatering system in chalk Dr Toby Roberts. CTRL Thames Tunnel

Building Code of New York State

Two Case Studies of Collapsed Temporary Excavation using Contiguous Bored Pile Wall

Taxiway embankment over soft ground using staged construction

Example of the Unified Design procedure for use in the September 8, 2014, short course on in Brazil

CE 6012 Ground Improvement Techniques Question Bank

Mitigation of the effects induced by shallow tunneling in urban environment: The use of compensation grouting in the underground Line B1 works in Rome

Important Note. Airport Authority Hong Kong

BORED MICROPILES. I.S.M 2009 London (10 th to 13 th may) 9 th International worksop on micropiles - by A. Jaubertou -

GEOTECHNICAL STUDY PROPOSED CONCRETE ROADWAY TIKI ISLAND COMMUNITY GALVESTON COUNTY, TEXAS PROJECT NO E

SLURRY WALLS FOR SEEPAGE CUTOFF IN LEVEE APPLICATIONS RECENT EXPERIENCE AND CONSTRUCTION CHALLENGES IN THE NORTHERN CENTRAL VALLEY OF CALIFORNIA

Research on Mutual Influence between Pipes of Curved Pipe-jacking Roof Project

Design Illustrations on the Use of Soil Nails to Upgrade Loose Fill Slopes

DEPTH EFFECTS AND VIBRATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH DYNAMIC COMPACTION CASE STUDY

Geotechnical Engineering Software GEO5

Soil Mechanics Lateral Earth Pressures page Lateral Earth Pressures in case of inclined ground surface or friction at wall-ground interface

TECHNOLOGY. Continuous Flight Auger

Experience of a Large Scale Unintentionally Long Surcharge on Organic Soils

Information Request 11

Modeling and monitoring of an excavation support using CSM

Jet Grouting Experience at Posey Webster Street Tubes Seismic Retrofit Project

Timber piles to mitigate liquefaction and lateral spreading, Aotea Quay Wellington

Grade separated interchange at the intersection of U.S. Hwy 17 Bypass and Farrow Parkway

SOURCES OF WATER SUPPLY GROUND WATER HYDRAULICS

Rehabilitation of the Coral Gables Wastewater Collection System

Ground Improvement Piling Piled Retaining Walls Enlarged Head Piles Innovations.

4D grouting pressure model of a bored tunnel in 3D Tunnel

April 7, Webster Street Sub-Surface Stormwater Storage System Bid No Bid Date: 4/13/17 ADDENDUM NO 1

4D grouting pressure model PLAXIS

Transcription:

Design of Temporary Excavation and Lateral Support System for the DSD Sheung Wan Stormwater Pumping Station By Eric Li - GCG (Asia) Presented to the HKIE Geotechnical Division 18 th June 2008 Sheung Wan Stormwater Pumping Station (SWSPS) 1

Project Set Up DSD Contract DC/2006/10 Contract Sum : HK$ 78 million (approx) Designer : Drainage Services Department (with GEO as in-house geotechnical consultant) Site Supervision : DSD Drainage Project Division (with the engagement of an IGE) Contractor : China National Chemical Engineering Group ELS Designer : Geotechnical Consultant Group (Asia) Ltd. 57m ~ -7.1mPD 43m ~ -5.9mPD Pile Cap Layout Plan 2

43m ~ +4.0mPD Retaining Wall Pile Cap / Base Slab ~ -5.9mPD ~ -7.1mPD Typical North-South Section Selection of Retaining Wall Type Wall Types Considered: Diaphragm Wall Bored Pile Wall Pipe Pile Wall Sheet Pile Wall No wall (open cut) Design Objectives: Approximate max. 10m deep excavation Effective control of settlement due to excavation and groundwater drawdown 3

Approx. Location of Site Reclamation and Seawall Dredging Plan Approx. Extent of SWSPS Vertical Seawall (Indicative) Victoria Harbour Typical Cross Section 4

Pre-Contract Ground investigation 2 series in 2002 & 2006 (32 holes) Common sampling, field and laboratory tests In situ vane & pressuremeter tests Pre-Contract Borehole Location Plan Fill Rock Fill Marine Deposits Sand Fill Alluvium CDG North-South Geological Section 5

Existing Salt Water PS Fill Marine Deposits Alluvium CDG East-West Geological Section (away from Seawall) Seawall Cope Line Isopach of Soft Marine Clays 6

Small sink hole at sea wall Seawall Cope Line 5m 3 sink hole 7

15m 3 sink hole 0.000 21/8/06 31/8/06 10/9/06 20/9/06 30/9/06 10/10/06-0.100 Settlement (m) SS Markers on Seawall SS1 SS2-0.200 SS3 SS4-0.300 0.000 21/8/06 31/8/06 10/9/06 20/9/06 30/9/06 GS20 10/10/06 GS21 GS24 GS25-0.100 Settlement (m) -0.200-0.300 GS Markers on Ground Adjacent to Seawall Settlement near Seawall 8

Design Considerations Reclamation Site Sensitive Structures nearby, i.e. WSD Pumping Station High water table, i.e. 1.2m below existing ground level (+3.0mPD) Presence of thick layer of variable FILL & soft MARINE DEPOSITS Design Methodology Drained and Undrained Conditions Lateral Stability Global Slope Stability Base Stability Hydraulic Stability Dewatering Ground Deformation / Settlement Structural Capacities 9

Plot of SPT-N against Elevation Plot of Undrained Shear Strength (Cu) against Elevation 10

FSP IV Sheet Pile Walings & Struts (3 levels) Adopted Shoring Layout Plan Longitudinal Cross Section further from Seawall 11

Longitudinal Cross Section nearest Seawall Transverse Cross Section 12

Penetration (T.A.M.) Grout Jet Grout Elevation of Wall D (Showing Grouting Ground Improvement) Sheetpile (not shown for clarity) Culvert West East Fill Marine Deposit Alluvium CDG Grout A Grout B Finite Element Analysis (East-West Section) 13

δ max = 115mm δ max = 60mm West Wall East Wall Wall Deflection (East-West Section) δ max = 18mm δ max = 82mm West Wall East Wall Ground Settlement (East-West Section) 14

δ max = 102mm δ max = 88mm South Wall North Wall Wall Deflection (North-South Section) δ max = 53mm δ max = 75mm South Wall North Wall Ground Settlement (North-South Section) 15

Seawater Fill (Sand) Seawall Tilt = 1/650 Fill (Rock) Exaggeration scale: 30 Deformation of Seawall Slope Stability Analysis (South Wall) 16

Principal Instrumentation : - Ground settlement markers (SS, GS, SA) - Inclinometers (IN, INX) - Standpipe Piezometer (SP, PZ, PP) - Building Tilt Marker North Wall West Wall East Wall Instrumentation Layout Plan Outline Construction Programme for Key Activities 17

Settlement against Time 0.050 0.000 H-Piling, Sheetpiling, Ground Improvement Grouting Excavation Settlement (m) -0.050-0.100-0.150-0.200-0.250 SS Markers on Seawall Pile Cap -0.300 SS3 SS2 SS1 SS4-0.350 01-Aug-06 01-Sep-06 01-Oct-06 01-Nov-06 01-Dec-06 01-Jan-07 01-Feb-07 01-Mar-07 01-Apr-07 01-May-07 01-Jun-07 01-Jul-07 01-Aug-07 01-Sep-07 01-Oct-07 01-Nov-07 01-Dec-07 01-Jan-08 Date Settlement against Time 0.000-0.100-0.200 Settlement (m) -0.300-0.400-0.500 GS Markers on Ground Adjacent to Seawall GS23 GS24 GS20-0.600 01-Aug-06 01-Sep-06 01-Oct-06 01-Nov-06 01-Dec-06 01-Jan-07 01-Feb-07 01-Mar-07 01-Apr-07 01-May-07 01-Jun-07 01-Jul-07 01-Aug-07 01-Sep-07 01-Oct-07 01-Nov-07 01-Dec-07 01-Jan-08 Date Ground Settlement Time Plot behind North Wall (Seawall) Settlement against Time 0.000-0.050-0.100-0.150 H-Piling, Sheetpiling, Ground Improvement Grouting Excavation Pile Cap Settlement (m) -0.200-0.250-0.300-0.350-0.400-0.450 GS31 GS34 GS28-0.500 01-Aug-06 01-Sep-06 01-Oct-06 01-Nov-06 01-Dec-06 01-Jan-07 01-Feb-07 01-Mar-07 01-Apr-07 01-May-07 01-Jun-07 01-Jul-07 01-Aug-07 01-Sep-07 01-Oct-07 01-Nov-07 01-Dec-07 01-Jan-08 Date Ground Settlement Time Plot behind East Wall 18

GS28 (6.2m) GS31 (9.6m) GS34 (15.6m) Predicted δ max = 82mm Inclinometer IN2 (1m) Predicted δ max = 115mm Ground Deformation behind East Wall (due to excavation only) Settlement against Time 0.010 0.000-0.010-0.020 Settlement (m) -0.030-0.040 Predicted δ max = 18mm -0.050-0.060 SS13 SS9 SS10 SS14-0.070 01-Aug-06 15-Aug-06 29-Aug-06 12-Sep-06 26-Sep-06 10-Oct-06 24-Oct-06 07-Nov-06 21-Nov-06 05-Dec-06 19-Dec-06 02-Jan-07 16-Jan-07 30-Jan-07 13-Feb-07 27-Feb-07 13-Mar-07 27-Mar-07 10-Apr-07 24-Apr-07 08-May-07 22-May-07 05-Jun-07 19-Jun-07 03-Jul-07 17-Jul-07 31-Jul-07 14-Aug-07 28-Aug-07 11-Sep-07 25-Sep-07 09-Oct-07 23-Oct-07 06-Nov-07 20-Nov-07 04-Dec-07 18-Dec-07 01-Jan-08 Date Ground Settlement Time Plot behind West Wall 19

4.0 Displacement (mm) 0 5 10 15 2.0 0.0-2.0-4.0 Elevation (mpd) -6.0-8.0-10.0 "+" toward excavation Predicted δ max = 60mm -12.0-14.0-16.0 Inclinometer IN5 (1m) -18.0 Ground Deformation behind West Wall (due to excavation only) Jet grouting Jet grout cuts insitu soft clay and mixes that with injected cement Disturbed clay is displaced to surface in slurry form Jet nozzle is typically 1.4mm to 3mm dia. Applicable to more cohesive soils where T.A.M. grouting may not work 20

Temporary casing for drilling through fill. Withdrawn prior to jetting. (optional) Soil Overburden PVC tubing to assist spoil return. (optional) Jet Grout Zone Typical Set up of Jet Grouting (Double Tube Method) Ref. : CNCEC 1. Set up rig 2. Drill to toe level 3. Test jetting 4. Commence Jetting 5. Simultaneously withdrawal and rotation of grout string to next level Sequence of Jet Grouting 6. Jet grout completed. Withdraw grout string Ref. : CNCEC 21

Jet grout parameters Jet grout parameters adopted at SWSPS Target grouted dia. = 1500 2000 mm Grout pressure = 300 400 bars Air pressure = 8-12 bars Withdraw rate = 13 to 15 min/m Rotation rate = 6 7 rev/step Target strength & stiffness UCS = 600 kpa Elastic modulus = 150 MPa 22

23

Jet Grout Core Sample 24

Hole S5 Hole S2 (UCS: typically 7-10 MPa, sometimes >40 MPa) Jet Grout Core Sample T.A.M. Grout Core Sample 25

T.A.M. Grout Core Sample Sheetpiling (by push-in method) Suitable in area where vibration is undesirable With limited penetration depth Difficult to overcome obstruction Tend to be more costly 26

Sheetpiling by push-in method At SWSPS Giken rig with special tool to overcome obstruction (up to 1m) Maximum 24m long sheet pile Limited to Type IV sheetpile Ref : Giken Seisakusho Co. Ltd Sheetpiling by push-in method 27

Augering to assist penetration 28

Drilling through Obstructions Cutter Head for Rock Obstructions 29

Alignment out-of-line when encountering obstructions Groundwater leaking through retaining wall 30

Excavation in progress Disposal by barge 31

Installing waling and strut Excavation completed 32

Concreting in progress Concreting in progress (3 concrete pumps & 13 concrete trucks) 33

Foundation Completed 散石徑 / 太極區 園林景觀工程設計 海濱長廊 綠化天台 小型廣場 方形花園 海濱長廊海濱長廊海濱長廊海濱長廊海濱長廊海濱長廊海濱長廊海濱長廊 觀賞園林 遮雨蓬 長椅 散石徑 裝飾性街燈 Asia HKIE Technical Talk ELS Design for Ref. SWSPS : DSD 18 June 2008 34

Before Commencement After Completion Ref. : DSD Summary Issues to be considered in ELS design Site history Site characterization Design parameters (drained or undrained) Design objective and constraints Retaining wall installation effects Economy and construction programme 35

Acknowledgement Drainage Services Department China National Chemical Engineering Corp Hyder Consulting Limited Thank You! 36