Analysis of Runoff Reduction and Hydrologic Cycle Utilizing LID Concepts

Similar documents
Porous Pavement Flow Paths

SWMM5 LID Control for Green Infrastructure Modeling

HYDROLOGIC CONSIDERATIONS. 22 nd Annual Nonpoint Source Pollution Conference Saratoga Springs, NY

Paraprofessional Training Session 1

Water Balance Methodology

The Islamic University of Gaza- Civil Engineering Department Sanitary Engineering- ECIV 4325 L5. Storm water Management

Infiltration Guidelines

Western Washington Hydrology Model (WWHM) Software Introduction. Doug Beyerlein, P.E., P.H., D.WRE Clear Creek Solutions, Inc. Mill Creek, Washington

Modelling Climate Change and Urbanization Impacts on Urban Stormwater and Adaptation Capacity

A Case for the Design and Modeling of BMP Infiltration and LID Techniques. By: Bob Murdock

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT BARRY ASH POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY

EXAMPLE Stormwater Management Plans w/ CSS BMP Sizing Calculator (v2.1)

Sustainable Urban Stormwater Best Management Practices with InfoSWMM Sustain plus InfoSWMM 2D and SWMMLive

Storm Water Management Model

Small Storm Hydrology and BMP Modeling with SWMM5

Module 10b: Gutter and Inlet Designs and Multiple Design Objectives

Chatham Park Stormwater Manual

Pre-Treatment Bioretention Cells Bioswales IOWA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL DECEMBER 16, 2015

The Texas A&M University and U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Hydrologic Modeling Inventory (HMI) Questionnaire

2011 Guidance Manual for Development Stormwater Quality Control Measures

Bay Area Hydrology Model

2001~2020(4 th ) Sound use of water and formulation of friendly and safe water environment

Bay Area Hydrology Model. User Manual

the 2001 season. Allison brought high winds and street flooding to Houston, after

Treatment Volume: Curve Numbers. Composite CN or Not? Treatment Volume: Curve Numbers. Treatment Volume: Calculation. Treatment Volume: Calculation

Western Washington Hydrology Model Version 3.0. User Manual

Summary of Detention Pond Calculation Canyon Estates American Canyon, California

Bay Area Hydrology Model User Manual

CASE STUDIES: BMPTRAINS MODEL

CITY UTILITIES DESIGN STANDARDS MANUAL

M.L. Kavvas, Z. Q. Chen, M. Anderson, L. Liang, N. Ohara Hydrologic Research Laboratory, Civil and Environmental Engineering, UC Davis

Decatur, Georgia Stormwater Management Policy Guidelines. DRAFT November 5, 2014

La Riereta Catchment Sant Boi de Llobregat

Rainfall, Runoff and Peak Flows: Calibration of Hydrologic Design Methods for the Kansas City Area

SEWAGE TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL

Modelling LIDs using PCSWMM and EPA SWMM5. March 28, 2012 Presented by: Rob James (CHI) Credit to: Lewis Rossman (US EPA)

L-THIA Online and LID in a watershed investigation

LID & Detention Pond Sizing Tool to Address Hydromodification and Water Quality in Clackamas County

Sunset Circle Vegetated Swale and Infiltration Basin System Monitoring Report: Rainy Seasons and

Hydrology 101. Impacts of the Urban Environment. Nokomis Knolls Pond Summer June 2008

Chapter 6. Hydrology. 6.0 Introduction. 6.1 Design Rainfall

APPENDIX IV. APPROVED METHODS FOR QUANTIFYING HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS OF CONCERN (NORTH ORANGE COUNTY)

RCFC&WCD LID TESTING AND DEMONSTRATION PROJECT

Low Impact Development (LID) Hydrology Considerations

Rainwater Harvesting for Domestic Water Supply and Stormwater Mitigation

2011 LID Symposium. Estimating Annual Runoff Based on the NRCS Runoff Curve Number. Loews Philadelphia Hotel Philadelphia, PA September 25-28, 2011

Introduction to Low Impact Development

Stormwater Volume and Treatment Methods Simplifying the Numbers. IAFSM March 10, Presented by: Tom Powers P.E., CFM, LEED AP, CPESC

Gwinnett County Stormwater System Assessment Program

6.0 Runoff. 6.1 Introduction. 6.2 Flood Control Design Runoff

M.L. Kavvas, Z. Q. Chen, M. Anderson, L. Liang, N. Ohara Hydrologic Research Laboratory, Civil and Environmental Engineering, UC Davis

Hydrology and Water Management. Dr. Mujahid Khan, UET Peshawar

GIS Applications in Water Resources Engineering

Chapter 3 Calculating the WQCV and Volume Reduction

National Stormwater Calculator. Webcast Logistics

The Bay Area Hydrology Model A Tool for Analyzing Hydromodification Effects of Development Projects and Sizing Solutions

Index. Page numbers followed by f indicate figures.

Implementing Stormwater Management through Split-Flow Drainage Design

Riverside County. Stormwater Quality Best Management Practice. Design Handbook

Urban Rainwater Harvesting Systems: Promises and Challenges

State-of-the-Practice Porous Asphalt Pavements. Kent R. Hansen, P.E. Director of Engineering National Asphalt Pavement Association

Review of State and Federal Stormwater Regulations November 2007

Background / Regulatory Requirements

GUIDELINES FOR STORMWATER BACTERIA REDUCTIONS THROUGH BMP IMPLEMENTATION NY/NJ HARBOR TMDL DEVELOPMENT

Incorporating Green Infrastructure for Stormwater Management at Airports

Bioswales, Wetlands, and Trees: How going green can be a part of a Wet Weather Management Plan. Presented by Brian Tornes, PE

Rhode Island Stormwater Design and Installations Standards Manual

Runoff Hydrographs. The Unit Hydrograph Approach

DRAINAGE & DESIGN OF DRAINAGE SYSTEM

Definitions 3/16/2010. GG22A: GEOSPHERE & HYDROSPHERE Hydrology

Smart Network Modeling for Effective Planning of Sustainable Urban Areas

COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT REVIEW. Spring Lake Park Schools Westwood Middle School st Avenue NE, Spring Lake Park, MN 55432

Preliminary Drainage Analysis

Chapter 2 - Hydrologic Analysis

At least 2 feet above the seasonal high water table Overflow path or structure provided

Uncertainty in Hydrologic Modelling for PMF Estimation

DRAINAGE DESIGN AND RUTTING PERFORMANACE GUIDELINES FOR PERMEABLE PAVEMENT

BAEN 673 / February 18, 2016 Hydrologic Processes

Simple Method for Estimating Phosphorus Export

Integrated Catchment Modelling

Nutrient Management in. A presentation to the West Metro Water Alliance

6 STOREY CONDOMINIUM 7480 DERRY ROAD WEST, MILTON

Effect of the Underlying Groundwater System on the Rate of Infiltration of Stormwater Infiltration Structures.

Page 1. Name:

Urbanizing Watersheds: Green Infrastructure and Hydrologic Function. Jay Dorsey, PE, PhD ODNR-DSWR October 30, 2014

Taking the pain out of the treatment train: continuous simulation modelling for integrated water management

Storm Sewer Design. Bob Pitt University of Alabama and Shirley Clark Penn State Harrisburg

UNIT HYDROGRAPH AND EFFECTIVE RAINFALL S INFLUENCE OVER THE STORM RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH

Section 600 Runoff Table of Contents

Overview of NRCS (SCS) TR-20 By Dr. R.M. Ragan

Stormwater Local Design Manual For Houston County, Georgia

Boise City Public Works General Drainage Plan Review Requirements Checklist

Techno-Economic Analysis of Hybrid Drainage Systems in South Australia

City of Gig Harbor Stormwater Management and Site Development Manual

URBAN FLOODING: HEC-HMS

DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 1) RUNOFF

MODEL Stormwater Local Design Manual. City of Centerville

Low Impact Development (LID) in a Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) District:

BRADLEY UNIVERSITY. The Performance and Sustainability of Permeable Pavement Progress Report on the Work Performed Under IAPA Scholarship

SUDS for Roads. Design Tools in new guidance targeted at roads engineers. Chris Jefferies, Taye Akinrelere & Frank Guz University of Abertay Dundee

Transcription:

Maine Stormwater Conference (Portland, ME, 2015) Analysis of Runoff Reduction and Hydrologic Cycle Utilizing LID Concepts Park Jongpyo, Lee Kyoungdo: HECOREA. INC Shin Hyunsuk: Busan National University 1 / 25

2 / 25

1. Objectives of the research LID techniques applied two different method in Eco-Delta city. The Method clayout with planter boxes (LID facilities) 1. To uniformly distributed planter boxes 2. To distributed planter boxes in a nearby drainage outlet area SWMM modeling and performance analysis Plan Space layout Plan of Planter boxes Study area Modeling Software SWMM Results analysis Stormwater Reduction Hydrologic cycle change Planning drawing of Eco-delta City in Busan, Korea 3 / 25

2. Eco-Delta City Introduce to Eco-Delta City Eco-Delta City is an Eco-Friendly waterfront city developed by K-water and Busan Metropolitan city Developing area: 11.9km 2 (3,000 ac), Construction period: 2012-2018 LID techniques will be applied to the entire area. 4 / 25

3. Weather and Geographic Information Weather Data: Busan weather station Month Temp( ) High Low mean Rainfall ( mm ) Wind speed ( m s ) Evapora tion (mm) Change of the number of years for rainfall 1월 17.6-11.5 3.0 33.4 3.9 65.0 2월 20.3-12.6 4.7 49.0 3.9 69.5 3월 22.9-9.7 9.5 81.3 4.1 91.0 4월 29.1 0.1 13.5 143.4 4.2 109.9 5월 34.0 7.3 17.5 161.2 3.7 122.6 6 월 30.1 10.8 20.7 209.5 3.4 111.9 7 월 35.8 14.5 24.2 299.8 3.8 117.0 Monthly rainfall 8 월 36.7 16.8 25.9 229.7 3.9 131.0 9 월 35.2 10.6 22.3 159.0 3.6 104.9 10 월 29.1 1.8 17.6 67.4 3.3 99.3 11 월 25.6-0.9 11.5 53.1 3.5 75.9 12 월 20.4-11.5 5.5 29.7 3.7 69.1 전년 36.7-12.6 14.6 1511.7 3.8 1164.1 Annual Rainfall: 1,511mm(60in) Summer season: 898mm (35in) 5 / 25

3. Weather and Geographic Information Present land-use & developing land-use plan Present land-use Farmland area: 77%, River: 3.5% :Hydrologic soil group D type: over 80% After development Housing area: 22%, Industrial area: 28% Green open space: 17% 1 st Stage Develoment The land-use maps are represented by pre-development and development land-use 6 / 25

3. Weather and Geographic Information Height & Slope analysis DEM(Digital Elevation model) Height difference between river and land: Below 1m:(3.28ft) (low-lying ground) Slope Plain area of the Nakdong Delta: Gentle slope topography (Below 5%) 7 / 25

4. LID plan (1 st stage: zone 2, This study application) The Study Area(Zone 2) of Eco-Delta City (1 st stage: ZONE 2, G basin) Zone 2: Total Area Study area: G Basin 770,966 m 2 (190 ac) 265,010 m 2 (65 ac) The study on Effect analysis: Runoff reduction and Water Cycle Improvement 1 st : The LID facility plan uniformly distributed planter boxes 2 nd : The LID facility plan distributed planter boxes in a nearby drainage outlet area Zone 2 Zone 1 8 / 25

4. LID plan and modeling scenario Modeling scenario: 1 st CASE The LID facility plan uniformly distributed planter box Key Map Study area: G Basin A Planter Boxes: catchment area 265,010 m 2 (65 ac) 28,650 m 2 (7 ac) Out 9 / 25

4. LID plan and modeling scenario Modeling scenario: 2 nd CASE: The LID facility plan distributed planter box in a nearby drainage outlet area Study area: G Basin A Planter Boxes: Catchment area Key Map 265,010 m 2 (190 ac) 28,650 m 2 (7 ac) Out 10 / 25

4. LID plan and modeling scenario Target rainfall 1: Design rainfall Duration 5yr 10yr 30yr Rainfall (mm) 66.5 (2.6 ) 77.9 (3.1 ) 94.9 (3.7 ) IDF Curve 11 / 25

4. LID plan and modeling scenario Target rainfall 2: One hour rainfall and monthly evaporation (2003-2014, 11years) Annual total Rainfall Annual total evaporation 1,472 mm (57.9 ) 1,100 mm (43.3 ) 12 / 25

4. LID plan and modeling scenario Summary of Modeling Scenario Design Rainfall Flood Reduction Assessment CASE 1 CASE 2 Long-Term Meteorological Data Hydrological cycle change Assessment 1 st CASE: The LID facility plan uniformly distributed planter box 2 nd CASE: The LID facility plan distributed planter box in a nearby drainage outlet area 13 / 25

5. Simulation Results : Runoff Reduction Flood Reduction: Return period 5year Div. Peak flow (m 3 /s) Flow Volume (m 3 ) Non-LID 6.68 (236 ft 3 /s) 15,530 (20,312 yd 3 ) CASE 1 6.13 (216 ft 3 /s) ( 8.1%) 14,260 (18,651 yd 3 ) ( 8.2%) CASE 2 5.99 (211 ft 3 /s) ( 10.0%) 14,380 (18,808 yd 3 ) ( 7.4%) Flood Reduction: Return period 10year Div. Peak flow (m 3 /s) Flow Volume Non-LID 8.15 (288 ft 3 /s) 18,440 (24,119 yd 3 ) CASE 1 7.52 (266 ft 3 /s) ( 7.7%) 17,030 (22,274 yd 3 ) ( 7.6%) CASE 2 7.37 (260 ft 3 /s) ( 9.6%) 17,146 (22,426 yd 3 ) ( 7.0%) SWMM LID simulation results on Runoff reduction shows that uniformly distributed planter boxes can reduce peak discharge runoff by 8.1, 7.7% compared to a non LID application each 5year and 10year storms. The peak discharge reduction rate when a planter box case was installed to the nearby drainage outlet was 10.0%, 9.6%. respectively 14 / 25

Runoff (cms) 5. Simulation Results : Runoff Reduction Flood Reduction: Return period 30year 구분 Peak flow (m 3 /s) Flow Volume Non-LID 10.38 (367 ft 3 /s) 22,853 (29,891 yd 3 ) CASE 1 9.66 (341 ft 3 /s) ( 6.9%) 21,274 (27,825 yd 3 ) ( 6.9%) CASE 2 9.52 (336 ft 3 /s) ( 8.3%) 21,390 (29,133 yd 3 ) ( 6.4%) 15.00 10.00 5.00 Non-LID CASE 1 CASE 2 0.00 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 Time(min) In 30year return period storm, Uniformly distributed LID facilities case can reduce peak discharge runoff by 6.9% the LID facility plan distributed a planter boxes in a nearby drainage outlet area can reduce peak discharge runoff by 8.3% The nearby drainage outlet case is better than the uniformly distributed case in terms of peak discharge reduction 15 / 25

6. The hydrologic cycle effect of LID Results of Infiltration & Runoff depth: 11year long-term simulation 구분 Infiltration depth(mm) Runoff depth(mm) Non-LID 70.7 (2.7 in) 1234.3 (48.6 in) CASE 1 133.9 (5.3 in) ( 89%) 1169.0 (46.0 in) ( 5.3%) CASE 2 119.4 (4.7 in) ( 69%) 1183.7 (46.6 in) ( 4.1%) 150 100 Infiltration Depth 50 0 Non-LID CASE-1 CASE-2 The Results of the infiltration rate have increased according to LID facility installation. The uniformly distributed planter box case improved the infiltration rate by 89% The installed planter box case to a nearby drainage outlet improved it by 69%. Runoff depth reduction rate of a uniformly distributed planter boxes area more than 20% the installation of a planter box in a nearby drainage outlet 16 / 25

7. Conclusion As a result of the research, the uniformly distributed LID plan has an advantage on hydrologic cycle improvement. However, the nearby drainage outlet case is better than the uniformly distributed case in terms of peak discharge reduction. BEST Design Strom Flood Reduction Assessment Nearby drainage outlet LID plan Long-Term Meteological Data Hydrological cycle change Assessment Uniformly distributed LID plan 17 / 25

And today INTRO: K-LIDM software Based on WWHM and SWMM Developed by Pusan National University / Korea GI&LID research Group HECOREA / CCS(Clear Cleek Solutions) 18 / 25

K-LIDM Concepts Input Data Drainage basin Input: HSPF input file form - Area (impervious, pervious), Land Use, Slope, Infiltaition & simulation parameter Channel & Pipe data (hydraulic Routing) - Bottom width, Length, Manning n, Slope of Channel, Left(Right) Side Slope, Depth Reservoir (Reservoir Routing) - Reservoir Facility Dimension(Area, Depth, Slope) - Outlet structure Water Quality parameter Rainfall - Long-term simulation: Day(day)-Rain(mm) and Evaporation data : Averaged a Month - Text or Excel Sheets Type monthly a day mean: Evaporation data (daily) Database development Infiltration Percolation LID modeling Component Units Surface runoff and Precipitation applied to LID facility Soil Layer (or Storage) Interflow / Groundwater LID Facility - Detention(Retention) Basin, Constructed Wetlands, Porous Pavement, Infiltration Trench, Bioretention, Green roofs, Infiltration Vegetated Filter Strip, Vegetated Swale, Tree Box filter, Rainwater Harvesting Etc. Facility Dimensions - Length, Width, Height, Effective Total Depth, Bottom slope, Freeboard, Vegetative Cover Infiltration - Thickness, porosity, Infiltration rate - Soil type of Soil layer Outlet structure - Type, Diameter, Height, Etc Parameter of Pollutant Removal Output Input Data Summary Produce Report Summary Report Flow - Duration, Frequency Hydrographs Groundwater Recharge volumes Clogging Calculation results Water Quality GUI : Graph, Table 19 / 25

K-LIDM UI We have developed global applicable software for LID effects modeling US, SI units / English, Korean language / SWMM linkage function 20 / 25

Main function of K-LIDM Scenario Comp. Hydro LID Control 21 / 25

LID component (ex. Bioretention) LID Component Bioretention Example) 22 / 25

Application Example - #1 Basin: 3Hectares Roads/Flat 100*100*5m Bioretention design Busan weather station 10-year, 1-hour rainfall data apply 100 m = 328 ft, 5m = 16 ft Monthly peak discharge Results 23 / 25

Application Example - #2 Basin: 5 Hectares Roads/ Steep 100*100*4m Sand filter 61*61*2m Reservoir Busan weather station 10-year, 1-hour rainfall data apply 100 m = 328 ft, 61 m=200 ft, 4 m=13 ft, 2 m= 6.6ft Display Results: 2014. 5.1 2014.9.30 24 / 25

25 / 25