TRIP REPORT BOOT ROAD EFRD SITE INFILTRATION TESTING

Similar documents
November 13, IP3406. Mr. Uriah Sowell Rooney Engineering 115 Inverness Drive East, Suite 300, Englewood, CO 80112

November 13, IP3406. Mr. Uriah Sowell Rooney Engineering 115 Inverness Drive East, Suite 300, Englewood, CO 80112

Determination of Design Infiltration Rates for the Sizing of Infiltration based Green Infrastructure Facilities

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT. 158 Attachment 2. Borough of Perkasie

Stormwater Standards. Clackamas County Service District No. 1. Infiltration Testing Guide

The following sections provide the approved standard infiltration testing specifications.

April 7, Webster Street Sub-Surface Stormwater Storage System Bid No Bid Date: 4/13/17 ADDENDUM NO 1

PROJECT NO A. ISSUED: February 29, 2016

This report presents the findings of the subsurface exploration concerning the design of the taxiway rehabilitation. Description

Appendix A. Infiltration and Soil Texture Testing Methods. Appendix A. A.1 General Description. A.2 Infiltration Testing: A Four-Step Process

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION OFFICE OF WATER MANAGEMENT OFFICE OF OIL AND GAS MANAGEMENT

Pollution Reduction Plan For Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System

Roscommon County Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control (SESC) Program Guide

DAM INSPECTION CHECKLIST Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waterways Engineering Division of Dam Safety

is a possibility of the existence of permafrost as a result

Stormwater Management Standards for Pennsylvania. Another. A presentation from The Other Side of the Table

August 15, 2006 (Revised) July 3, 2006 Project No A

Transitioning from the Percolation Test to Soils Evaluation Colorado Environmental Health Association Annual Education Conference 2015

Boise City Public Works General Drainage Plan Review Requirements Checklist

EXAMPLE Stormwater Management Plans w/ CSS BMP Sizing Calculator (v2.1)

Stormdrain Solutions. Stormdrain Solutions. Treating Stormwater at the Source

E. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

PERVIOUS PAVEMENT. Alternative Names: Permeable Pavement, Porous Concrete, Porous Pavers

New techniques for stabilizing, amending and revegetating mine waste

Geotechnical Engineering Report

Infiltration Testing For Stormwater BMPs: What Would Mickey Mouse Do?

Porous Pavement Flow Paths

Maria Cahill, Green Girl Land Development Solutions; Derek C. Godwin and Marissa Sowles, Oregon Sea Grant Extension

N.J.A.C. 7:8 Stormwater Management Rules - Design and Performance Standards. Nonstructural Strategies Assist with Strategy #2; See Page 3

North Umpqua Hydroelectric Project (FERC 1927) Erosion Control Plan Site Remediation/ Assessment Form

Hydrologic Soil Group Knowledge Matrix

Applying landforming to reclamation: A case study in Central Appalachia

PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING DESIGN MEMORANDUM WATER TREATMENT PLANT FLOOD WALL TO PROTECT BACKWASH SETTLING BASIN CITY OF NEW BUFFALO, MI

DIVISION 31 EARTHWORK 2006 Edition, Published January 1, 2006; Division Revision Date: January 31, 2012

Waterbury Library / Municipal Complex 28 North Main Street Waterbury, Vermont KAS Project #

Stormwater Quality Extended Detention Basin Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Manual. for: Located at: Prepared for: Prepared by:

Typical Subsurface Profile. November 28, 2016

Mariner East 2 Project Sunoco Pipeline L.P.

SECTION 1 BIO-INFILTRATION BUMP OUTS (BIBO)

Rhode Island Stormwater Design and Installation Standards Manual

Attachment D-1: Civil/Structural Scope of Work

JOSHUA TREE SURVEY REPORT FOR THE BURRTEC WASTE AND RECYCLING SERVICES YUCCA VALLEY FACILITY YUCCA VALLEY, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

Date Prepared: Location: Time: Approximate Temperature (degrees F): Weather Conditions: Project Name:

PUBLIC WORKS SKAGIT COUNTY SAMISH ISLAND ROAD SAMISH ISLAND ROAD SLIDE REPAIR

Site Location. Figure 1: Site Location Map US-24 and I-275 Interchange Ash Township, Monroe County, Michigan

ATTACHMENT 4: Design Calculations and Construction Details

POND CONSTRUCTION. Woodland Steward Series

Agronomic and soil quality trends after five years of different tillage and crop rotations across Iowa

DUKE UNIVERSITY DESIGN GUIDELINES

Hydrodynamic Separation Product Calculator

BMP 6.4.4: Infiltration Trench

SUBSURFACE INFILTRATION SYSTEM DESCRIPTION. Alternative Names: Sump, Drywell, Infiltration Trench, Infiltration Galleries, Leach Fields

APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A PRIVATE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM. 1. Name (Owner): Phone # ( )

Treatment Volume: Curve Numbers. Composite CN or Not? Treatment Volume: Curve Numbers. Treatment Volume: Calculation. Treatment Volume: Calculation

RECLAMATION REGULATIONS

Permeability Field Investigation

Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Lawrence University Garden, Appleton, Wisconsin

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT BARRY ASH POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY

WELCOME TO THE CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER PERMIT WEBINAR

PROPER CARE OF UNUSED WELLS

WELL RECORD INSTRUCTIONS (Unconventional Operators only)

C. Foundation stabilization for pipe and utility structures.

Straw Bale Barrier. - Along the face and at grade breaks of exposed and erodible slopes to shorten slope length and spread runoff as sheet flow

Memorandum. FOUNDATION ENGINEERING, INC. Professional Geotechnical Services. Date: August 13, 2012 To:

B. Install storm drain inlet protection to prevent clogging of the stormsewer and sediment loads to downstream stormwater facilities or waterbodies.

Preliminary Drainage Analysis

PA Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) TMDL Plan

Bioreactor Landfill Design

Rock Fill Layer Management and Maintenance Plan Former BNSF Site 13 Highway 99 Eugene, Oregon

Water Budget IV: Soil Water Processes P = Q + ET + G + ΔS

Culvert Sizing procedures for the 100-Year Peak Flow

INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUBMITTING A COMMERCIAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL PERMIT APPLICATION

Special Research Study. Comparison of Stormwater Pipe Installation Lengths and Costs in Texas: Frisco, Arlington, Austin, Victoria and Hidalgo County

TURF-TEC 6 and 12 INCH INFILTRATION RINGS INSTRUCTIONS (IN7-W & IN8-W)

STORMWATER AND EROSION CONTROL PERMIT

Subsurface Investigation Report. Proposed New 1-Story Building 6447 Grand Avenue Gurnee, Illinois

Straw Bale Barrier. Parallel to a roadway to keep sediment off paved areas

Geotechnical Engineering Report South Shore Carter Lake Campground Expansion Northwest of CR 31 and Cougar Run Lane Larimer County, Colorado

INTERLOCK BETWEEN PARTICLES AT EACH PERFORATION

Rhode Island Stormwater Design and Installations Standards Manual

Watershed size and name: The drainage area is acres. The pond is located within the Ohio River watershed. (2016 Inflow Design Plan)

Stormwater Volume and Treatment Methods Simplifying the Numbers. IAFSM March 10, Presented by: Tom Powers P.E., CFM, LEED AP, CPESC

Ohio Department of Transportation Division of Production Management Office of Geotechnical Engineering. Geotechnical Bulletin

Standards for Soil Erosion and Sediment Control in New Jersey May 2012 STANDARD FOR SLOPE PROTECTION STRUCTURES. Definition

The Borehole Permeameter Approach for Stormwater Infiltration Testing

CACHE VALLEY STORM WATER DESIGN STANDARDS. As Amended by Logan City November 2010

Constructed Wetland Use in Nonpoint Source Control


MODEL Stormwater Local Design Manual. City of Centerville

REPORT OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING ANALYSIS BRUNSWICK FARM APARTMENTS MANOR TWP., LANCASTER CO.

StormwaterWise Landscapes: Pervious Surfaces Specifications

Liquid Manure Storage Structure Construction Inspections. Concrete Liner Construction Inspections and Stormwater Basics

STARK COUNTY HEALTH DEPAIRmEm

16.0 Water Quality Management Criteria for Developed Land

Standards for Soil Erosion and Sediment Control in New Jersey May 2012 STANDARD FOR GRASSED WATERWAYS. Definition. Purpose

Construction Inspection Checklists

Michigan Criteria for On-Site Wastewater Treatment ~~~~~~~

4 EXTREME FOUNDATION PANELS

SECTION 17.1 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND EROSION CONTROL

Appendix B. Storm Drain System Data

Transcription:

TRIP REPORT BOOT ROAD EFRD SITE INFILTRATION TESTING 1.0 PURPOSE This Trip Report presents the field data and results of double-ring soil infiltration tests conducted to support the design of a stormwater management system at the Boot Road EFRD site located in West Goshen Township, Chester County, Pennsylvania as part of the Pennsylvania Pipeline Project (PPP) for Sunoco Pipeline, LP. One deep and two shallow tests (IT-A and IT-B) were performed at the site. The test locations are listed by coordinates (latitude and longitude) in Table 1 and shown on the attached figure. 2.0 FIELD ACTIVITIES The infiltration tests were conducted by Ken McGill and Heather Rychlak of CH2M Hill, Inc., on October 6, 2016. The test locations were positioned in the field using a handheld, WAAS-enabled GPS unit. Table 1 provides the coordinates of the test locations. All three tests were located in a grassy field, approximately 50 feet northeast of East Boot Road. The infiltration tests were performed in accordance with the procedure specified in the 2006 Pennsylvania Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMP) Manual. The test locations were prepared with hand tools and a mini-excavator, and care was taken to minimize disturbance of the soil surface to be tested. Double-ring infiltrometers were used for testing and consisted of 24-inch diameter and 12-inch diameter sections of steel casing, each 20 inches in height, as well as a set of double-ring infiltrometers with ring sizes consisting of an 8-inch and a 4-inch with both being 10-inches in height. After digging to the target depth, the test surface was leveled, and loose soil and debris were removed. The rings were driven a minimum of 2 inches into the soil. The infiltration test depths are presented in Table 1. The test locations were pre-soaked for 1 hour. The tests were then conducted with measurements at 10-minute or 30-minute intervals, based on the observed water level drop during the last half of the pre-soak period. Pre-soak and test information was recorded on infiltration test data sheets; copies of the test data sheets are attached to this report. During the testing, the weather was sunny, approximately 65 degrees Fahrenheit, and no precipitation was observed during the time of testing. Additionally, no precipitation was observed 24 hours prior to testing. Test pits were excavated near each testing location to characterize the soil, determine the depth to bedrock, if encountered, and inspect for evidence of the seasonal high water table. The test pits were identified with the corresponding infiltration test name. The test pits were machineexcavated to 2 feet below the target infiltration test depth or refusal, whichever was encountered first. Descriptions of the soil were recorded on field logs, which were based on the form example in the BMP manual. Copies of the field soil logs are attached to this report.

3.0 RESULTS 3.1 Soil Description Soils encountered generally consisted of a thin (up to approximately 4 inches) brown (7.5YR 4/4) organic loam topsoil/surface layer. This topsoil/surface layer was underlain by a dark brown (7.5YR 3/4) silt loam layer which ranged down to approximately 48 inches below ground surface. Bedrock/excavator refusal was encountered at approximately 30-48 inches below ground surface. Seasonal high water was not observed at the testing location. Lithochromatic mottling was observed in the test pit for IT-B. Roughly 15% of the soil profile contained mottles of strong brown (7.5YR 5/6). According to United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey data, the soil type for the test locations is mapped as follows: Glenelg Silt Loam - (GgB soil symbol) with 3-8 percent slopes; with medium runoff and is well drained. 3.2 Infiltration Tests Results Table 1 summarizes the infiltration rates (inches per hour) calculated from the test data. Infiltration rates presented in Table 1 were calculated from the average water level drop of the last four stabilized readings measured in the inner ring. The pre-soak test results for IT-A (surface and deep) and IT-B (surface) indicated low infiltration rates, requiring 30 minute test cycles. Test IT-B (deep) was not conducted due to bedrock encountered at approximately 30 inches below ground surface during test pit excavation.

Table 1 Summary of Infiltration Test Results Boot Road EFRD West Goshen Township, Chester County, PA Sunoco PPP Test Location (IT-) LATITUDE Location Data LONGITUDE Test Depth (inches) Infiltration Test Result (inches/hour) IT-A (shallow) 40.0047902-075.5805140 4 0.20 IT-A (deep) 24 0.20 IT-B (shallow) 40.0047081-075.5806076 4 1.00 IT-B (deep) NA NA Note: NA = Test not conducted due to encountering bedrock at approximately 30 inches below ground surface.

Figure 1 Infiltration Tests Infiltration Testing Locations Boot Road EFRD Soil Type: Glenelg Silt Loam (GgB) Chester County, PA Legend N 2016 Google 300 ft

ATTACHMENTS

SOIL LOGS

INFILTRATION TEST DATA SHEETS