Transit Marketing Study

Similar documents
Re-Engineering Call Handling and Customer Complaint Processing

ADVERTISING 2016 INFORMATION & RATES. Kim Britton, Marketing Director

The Next Next Generation Customer Information System

2016 TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN for the LASSEN COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY: 2016 CUSTOMER SATISFACTION STUDY

Efficient. Enhanced. Improved. Department of Community Services

NEW ORLEANS REGION TRANSIT COMPREHENSIVE OPERATIONS ANALYSIS SCOPE OF SERVICES. RPC Project LA90X361

CAPITAL METRO TRANSIT ADVERTISING

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Proposed Overnight Service Pilot

Inclusive Coalition Building. Lewis and Clark County Case Study

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY. Nevin Grinnell Marketing January 10, 2012

DC Circulator Fare Adjustment Plan. April 2018

ARLINGTON COUNTY TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN

1.201 / / ESD.210 Transportation Systems Analysis: Demand and Economics. Assignment 2

Transit Service Guidelines

BC Transit Customer Satisfaction Survey Results. Prepared by TransPro Consulting July

DOWNTOWN AUSTIN PARKING STRATEGY DETAILED IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

Transit, Intercity Bus, Taxi 8-1

Subject 2015 MiWay Customer Satisfaction Survey Results. Recommendation

Scarecrow Fest. St. Charles, Illinois

Sustainability. Sustainability Principles. 1. Framework. Spokane Transit s definition of Sustainability is:

Integrating sustainability in decision-making processes

2. OMNITRANS SYSTEM. 2.3 Omnitrans Services. 2.1 Background. 2.4 Traditional Fixed Route Service. 2.2 Omnitrans Mission TRANSIT DESIGN GUIDELINES

Blue/Yellow Line Service Realignment

Mission Capital Metro connects people, jobs and communities by providing high quality and sustainable transportation choices.

Biennial user and non user survey FINAL REPORT

Safety and Service Delivery Committee. Action Item III-A. January 11, 2018

Service Standards and Policies

TRANSIT SERVICES Business Plan

advertising opportunities

METRO SYSTEM PERFORMANCE REPORT. PERFORMANCE INDICATORS AND CUSTOMER SATISFACTION Customer Service, Operations and Safety Committee February 16, 2006

PRTC Strategic Plan Recommendations

Cleveland HealthLine Bus Rapid Transit

Lethbridge Transit Master Plan. Final Report Presentation July 17, 2017

Title VI LEP Four Factor Analysis and Implementation Plan

ANNUAL BUSINESS PLAN. Chapter Purpose Statement. (Statement in progress)

Caltrain Fare Study Update

2018 transit accessibility plan DRAFT

SERVICE IMPROVEMENT STRATEGIES AND SCENARIOS

TRANSPORTATION FACTS. OUR CUSTOMERS: Travel Patterns

Calgary Transit Park and Ride Guiding Principles for Future Improvements

PROTECTING Our Quality of Life... Why the Capital Region Needs to Invest in Mass Transit NOW

1 Traffic information for applicants and traffic operators

Subarea Mobility Enhancements. 5.1 Transit and Pedestrian Improvements

New Jersey Department of Transportation Bureau of Research RESEARCH PROJECT Request for Proposal Program

DISTRICT OF TOFINO REQUEST FOR QUOTES

Request for Proposal

Quick Intro: Margaret Young, Chief Customer Experience Officer

General Population Survey Summary

Integrating Frequent Transit Service & Corridor-based Transit Supportive Environments in the Metro Vancouver Region. July 2009

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Executive Summary... i. Section I Introduction... 1 Overview of the Transportation System Section II...

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary

Peter Klitz Senior Planner Transit Network Management TransLink (Metro Vancouver)

Customer & Community Satisfaction Survey

Possible ways to improve public bus transportation in Itaperuna, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Guest and Community Highlights

ONE CALL-ONE CLICK Profiles MANITOWOC COUNTY, WISCONSIN

You Have the Data, Now What?

Steve Patrinick Dallas Area Rapid Transit, Dallas, TX Tim Crobons Connetics Transportation Group, Lake Mary, FL Andrew Ittigson AECOM, Dallas, TX

Contact: Jessica Maxwell Marketing Director (254)

2040 Transportation Policy Plan Conversion to Performance Based Planning Basis. 25 th Annual CTS Transportation Research Conference May 21, 2014

NIELSEN SHARE OF WALLET LITE. A Look at Hispanic Spending on Consumer Packaged Goods

Commuter Rail: Best Practices and Revenue Growth Proposal. March 6, 2017

Ready to Ride Program Update

Fairmount Line Feasibility Study

ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. Fuel Crisis Contingency Plan Update. Staff Report

City Council Workshop Agenda Item #2

TRANSIT SERVICE GUIDELINES

Solution Overview : The IBM Government Industry Framework

2018 Fare Change Proposal

Proposal for RAC Social Media Presence

Title VI Fare Equity Analysis

Website Usability & Effectiveness October 2014

Request for Proposal Council of Engineering and Scientific Society Executives (CESSE)

What is USA TouchPoints?

ISSUES & RISKS Potential timing and coordination with a future system planning process Coordination with jurisdictions and partner transit agencies

Mobility on Demand for Improving Business Profits and User Satisfaction

The Myths of Open Payment Fare Collection Debunked!

Awareness and Use of Real-Time Travel Information: A Panel Study of the Dallas US-75 and San Diego I-15 Corridors

CAPITAL AREA TRANSIT PLANNING SERVICE STANDARDS AND PROCESS. Planning Department

FUTURE BUS RAPID TRANSIT PLANS

JCDecaux N O R T H A M E R I C A

PURPOSE. Joint Transportation Committee (JTC) directed to:

S-09: Auburn Station Access Improvements

Transit Fare Strategy Draft Recommendations

VICTORIA REGIONAL TRANSIT SYSTEM

Becoming a Transit Bus Operator

SPONSORSHIP OPPORTUNITIES

Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority Response to the State-Mandated Performance Audit, January 12, 2017

FUTURE HORIZONS FOR SAN BENITO COUNTY SHORT- AND LONG-RANGE TRANSIT PLAN FINAL REPORT

Official Publication of the High Point Market SPONSORSHIP MEDIA KIT

DART s Role in Transit - Oriented Development. Jack Wierzenski,, Director Economic Development & Planning Dallas Area Rapid Transit

Fare Collection 101: Fare Policy

Bus Passenger Survey - spring 2016 results

Fairfax County Countywide Transit Network Study

Tourism Supply Chains: A Conceptual Framework

,LLC. June 25, SPONSORSHIP PACKAGE. Mesquite Convention Center

KNOXVILLE REGIONAL TRANSIT CORRIDOR STUDY

Independent Accountants Report on Applying Agreed-Upon Procedures

Transcription:

Transit Marketing Study 2009 Passenger Survey FY 2010 13 Marketing Plan Transit Marketing, LLC Charlottesville Transit Service

Passenger Satisfaction & Profile 2009 On Board Passenger Survey

On-Board Survey-March 2009 Surveyed 100% of Runs (Weekday, Sat, Sun) Self Administered, Bilingual Questionnaire Sample Route 7: n=802 Sample error +/ 3.2% Trolley: n=1463 Sample error +/ 2.2% Other routes: n=815 Sample error +/3.2% Entire sample: N=3,000 + Sample error +/ 1.1%

Customer Satisfaction 2009 On Board Passenger Survey

Willing to Recommend

Service Ratings

One third of riders are new to system in past 15 months Duration of Ridership

Regional Services & Improvements 2009 On Board Passenger Survey

Regional Service Rating

Support for RTA

Service Improvements

Demographics 2009 On Board Passenger Survey

UVA Affiliation

Employment Status 61% of Riders are employed 86% are employed or students

Market Segments

Age: Riders & Population City of Charlottesville 56% of Riders are under 30

Income: Riders & Population One quarter of riders have incomes of $50K+

Reason for Using CTS 2009 On Board Passenger Survey

Transit Dependence 31% of riders have modal choice

Reasons for Using CTS

Usage Characteristics 2009 On Board Passenger Survey

59% of trips are work or school commutes Trip Purpose

Intensiveness of Use Intensive: 6-7 days per week Frequent: 4-5 days per week Occasional: 3 days per week or fewer

Information Sources 2009 On Board Passenger Survey

Information Sources

Website Use 39% of riders have visited website in past 30 days 51% of UVa students have visited, 31% say primary info source

Market Segments

Current Riders Primarily employees and students Slightly younger than general population (56% under 30) Mix of transit dependent and bychoice riders (30%) High satisfaction Passenger Survey

Potential Riders Transit service considered essential to Charlottesville community. High awareness, but low level of knowledge. Many misperceptions about service levels frequency, hours, connections with UTS. Lack of awareness for information services considered difficult to understand. Good, but not good enough for the average citizen to use. Community Audit

Marketing Strategies

Marketing Strategies The Basics Branding Customer Experience Passenger Information Awareness Knowledge Image Advertising Public Relations Community Outreach Targeted Ridership Programs UVa Students UVa Staff and Faculty UVa Hospital Visitors Visitors at Hotels along West Main and Hwy 29 School Students Senior Citizens PVCC Students Downtown Employees Downtown Customers Low Income Families

Branding

Branding Rebrand CTS with a new name and look Increase visibility and awareness Convey an image that is friendly, up to date, environmental and easy. New name, logo, vehicle graphics and bus stop signage. Brand Signature Stops at key boarding/alighting locations.

Name CAT Charlottesville Area Transit Charlottesville Albemarle Transit

Passenger Information Redesign Riders Guide for ease of use. Establish a dedicated transit website with a focus on the rider. Simplify static bus stop displays. Promote telephone information services. Enhance on vehicle communications. Publish how to ride info in Spanish. Create stand alone FREE Trolley guide. Integrate Google Transit link into on line community calendar. Develop permanent passenger information displays. www.catchthecat.org

Advertising Utilize exterior bus ads to increase service awareness in Year 1. Weekend Service Evening Service FREE Trolley 15 minute service from UVA to Fashion Square New Day Pass

Advertising Utilize exterior bus ads to increase service awareness in Year 1. New brand introduction campaign in Year 2. Focus on Ease of Use New Passenger Information Tools

Advertising Utilize exterior bus ads to increase service awareness in Year 1. New brand introduction campaign in Year 2. Testimonial ad campaign in Years 3 and 4. Credibility People Like You Target Groups

Implementation Plan Three Budget Levels

Implementation Plan Four Year Plan FY 2010: $48,000 FY 2011: $60,000 FY 2012: $60 90 120,000 FY 2013: $60 90 120,000 Implementation Budget/Timetable