APPENDIX C REPRESENTATIVE HABITAT PHOTOGRAPHS

Similar documents
Acres within Planning Area. Total Acres Burned

Work Plan EAS Components

Missouri Streams. Fact Sheet. What factors affect stream habitat? Stream Habitat Affects Aquatic Communities

Conservation of Biological Diversity

3.6 Riparian Ecosystem Wildlife

Lesson 2-2: Riparian Zones

Chapter 13: Wildlife and Vegetation

Water and Watersheds. Data Maps Action

Wildlife Conservation Strategy

Mechanical Site Preparation

Carp Creek 2013 Summary Report

Proposed Wildlife Habitat Restoration Project At Walking Iron Wildlife Area August 6, 2015

GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR CONDUCTING THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES SURVEYS IN THE PINELANDS AREA. March 25, 2006 INTRODUCTION

Appendix J. Forest Plan Amendments. Salvage Recovery Project

Background. AEM Tier 2 Worksheet Stream & Floodplain Management. Glossary

Introduction. Methodology for Analysis

Post-Fire BAER Assessment Burned Area Emergency Response (BAER)

Pennsylvania Lacustrine Condition Level 2 Rapid Assessment Protocol Version 1.0

Survey of Bottom Substrate Composition and Fish Habitat Value at Nett Lake

Fire Management CONTENTS. The Benefits of Guidelines...3 Considerations...4

Impoundment Fluctuation, Assessment of Littoral Zone Habitat, Mapping of Wild Rice Beds, and Assessment of River Shoreline Erosion

::no::

Visual Management System and Timber Management Application 1

Department of the Army Permit Application

Design With Nature: How to Create an Old Growth Forest. Chuck Pettis Earth Sanctuary

Principles of Wildlife Ecology & Management Maryland Woodland Stewards Training Workshop

New Jersey Forest Stewardship Program Spatial Analysis Project Map Products And Data Layers Descriptions


RIVERSIDE OXBOW FORT WORTH, TEXAS CHAPTER 3 IDENTIFICATION OF PROBLEMS AND OPPORTUNITIES

Hydropower Project License Summary PIT RIVER, CA PIT 1 HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT (P-2687) Pit River below Pit 1 Powerhouse

Wetlands Project Guidance

3-13 Other Required Findings and Regulatory Compliance

Holly Swartz and Jason Shirey

Forest Resources of the Black Hills National Forest

GENERAL SPECIFICATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION FOR CONSTRUCTION IN WATERBODIES AND ON WATERBODY BANKS

Chapter 4 Watershed Goals and Objectives

Managing for a healthy sugarbush in a changing climate

Riffle Beetles to Riparian Buffers

Fire Management in. Rocky Mountain National Park

Vegetation Resources Inventory

Biodiversity, Species Interactions, and Population Control. Chapter 5

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

If your property includes a

Hat Creek Planning Unit. Fish, Plant, and Wildlife Habitat. LCP Volume II Supporting Analysis for Recommendations

KANAWHA RIVER, WEST VIRGINIA

SKIBO PROJECT SCOPING REPORT Laurentian Ranger District, Superior National Forest

Duwamish Waterway Self Guided Tour: Turning Basin Number Three and Terminal 105 Aquatic Habitat Restoration Sites

APPENDIX D: COST ESTIMATES FOR STUDY REACHES

CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION REVIEW - NEPA COMPLIANCE RECORD

Chapter 3 Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences

BIOMES. Living World

Forsythe II Project. September 2015

Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of Watercraft. Scenic Rivers Program

The McKenzie River Watershed Conservation Strategy

Wildlife Management Concepts

38. VEGETATION Introduction. Vegetation Cook Inlet Drainages

Managing Forests For Wildlife 3/13/2017 1

Willamette National Forest Sweet Home Ranger District

Developing forestry practices. Managing for Timber and Wildlife Diversity NATIONAL WILD TURKEY FEDERATION PRE-HARVEST PLANNING:

Stream Watch Visual Survey Instructions

Crow s Foot Conservation Area Feasibility Study

APPENDIX A KETTLE RIVER REACH CHARACTERIZATION TABLES AND REACH MAPS

Tundra Shootingstar (Dodecatheon austrofrigidum K.L. Chambers) Habitat Assessment and Surveys on the Olympic National Forest, WA

Economics of Implementing Two-stage Channels

The Important Role of Landowners in Managing Unique Habitats. Darcy Kind Private Lands Biologist WDNR- Madison

Chapter 10 Natural Environment

Nancy L. Young, Forester USAID/USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service

TRENDS IN DELAWARE S FORESTS

Adapting to Climate Change in the Northeast: Experiences from the Field. Climate Projections for Forests: A Quick Summary

Adapting to Climate Change in the Northeast: Experiences from the Field

BIG ROCHE A CRI LAKE CHARACTERISTICS

NOTE: Photos of Unit 54 will be provided with these notes for the Stewardship Crew.

Implementation of Priority CRP Conservation Practices and Estimated Nutrient Load Reductions

Tracy Hames unfurls a three foot map

Practice Plan for Sparta Mountain Wildlife Management Area (WMA) Stand 33: Restore Old Growth

CDFW Compliance Guidance

Relicensing Study 3.5.1

LOWER WATER TEMPERATURES WITHIN A STREAMSIDE BUFFER STRIP

Application for resource consent Form B Damming and diversion of water

Environmental Impact Statement

RIPARIAN FOREST BUFFER

Summary Alternative 1 No Action

NORTH FORK FEATHER RIVER PLANNING UNIT Feather River Watershed

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Bureau of Water Quality Protection. Design Criteria - Wetlands Replacement/Monitoring

Information Request 37

MONITORING QUESTIONS AND TASKS FOR THE GEORGE WASHINGTON PLAN

Natural Resource Management of Pipeline Infrastructure

Cat Island Chain Restoration, Green Bay

Province Integrated Resource Management Project

Highlights of South Platte Protection Plan

Marcellus Shale Gas Development in Maryland: A Natural Resource Analysis

Overview of the Aquatic Resource Condition Level 2 Rapid Assessments

For the property described as: Property Owner: Name. Phone Number. Mailing Address. City. Report Year:

Sediment Management Alternatives Analysis

United States Department of the Interior

Watts Creek 2014 Summary Report

8/5/2011. Lesson Overview. Disturbance/Fragmentation. Shifting Mosaic. Number one cause of biodiversity loss. Types of disturbance. - Scale, frequency

Habitat Grant Projects Clinton River Watershed

LEGAL AUTHORITY AND JURISDICTIONS

Managing Wildlife Habitats

Transcription:

APPENDIX C REPRESENTATIVE HABITAT PHOTOGRAPHS 1304 119 Combined Vegetation and TES assesment

9a 10 8b 1,2 3a 6a 6b 11 9b 3b 4b 5c, 5d 4a 5b 8a 7b 5a Appendix C. Approximate Location of Representative Habitat Photographs. 1305 120 Combined Vegetation and TES assesment

Figure C-1. Powder River below Mason Dam, July 2008 (top) and the Channel Bed Early October 2008 (bottom). Compare the top photograph to figure C-2 to see the amount of seasonal lateral fluctuation. The bottom photograph shows the cobble bed substrate and the dense macrophyte and algal beds limiting mussel habitat. 1306 121 Combined Vegetation and TES assesment

Location of herbaceous wetlands Figure C-2. Powder River Riparian Habitat below Mason Dam. Note the large zone of fluctuation (area of exposed cobble) and the narrow extent of riparian vegetation. These features plus the presence of fish predators limits this habitat for spotted frog. The lack of shrub cover limits the habitat for riparian-dependent bird species. There is no habitat for listed plant species 1307 122 Combined Vegetation and TES assesment

Figure C-3. Powder River Riparian Habitat at the FS Recreation Area Bridge (top) and the Eastern Study Area Boundary (bottom). Evidence of lateral water level fluctuations is still evident, although reduced. TES habitat is limited by the same factors as listed in figure C-2. 1308 123 Combined Vegetation and TES assesment

Figure C-4. Unnamed Phillips Lake Tributary, October 2007. There is little sediment in the channel, with seasonal water level fluctuations of 6 to 12 inches. The high stream power, water level changes and narrowness of the riparian corridor limit the tributary as spotted frog and TES riparian bird species habitat. 1309 124 Combined Vegetation and TES assesment

Figure C-5c. Aspens with the 0.12 acre aspen clump along the tributary. 1310 125 Combined Vegetation and TES assesment

Figure C-5d. Aspen-dominated riparian wetland along the unnamed tributary. 1311 126 Combined Vegetation and TES assesment

Figure C-6. Ponderosa Pine Forest in the Mason Dam Study Area. The forest is open and generally lacks snags. The largest trees occur within or adjacent to the recreational areas. 1312 127 Combined Vegetation and TES assesment

Figure C-7. Young PIPO/CAGE pine forest (top) and mid-successional mixed forest (PSME/CAGE2) (bottom). 1313 128 Combined Vegetation and TES assesment

Figure C-8. Transmission line grassland (top) and parking lot grassland (below). 1314 129 Combined Vegetation and TES assesment

Figure C-9a. Talus Slope/Rock Outcrops along FS Road 1145. The slopes contain numerous human trails, including trails to the small outcrop openings in the top photo. 1315 130 Combined Vegetation and TES assesment

Figure C-9b. Aspen Seep East of FS Road 1145. Although supporting wetland plants and providing potential microhabitats for sensitive mosses, no sensitive moss species were located. 1316 Combined Vegetation and TES assesment

Figure C-10. Boulders in the Powder River Recreation Area, July and October 2008. The lichen flora on the boulders is diverse but contains common and widespread lichen species such as Xanthoria elegans (orange, bottom photo) and Umbillicaria hyperborea (dark brown, bottom photo). 1317 132 Combined Vegetation and TES assesment

Figure C-11. Potential TES Enhancement Area. The rock outcrops with numerous fissures and small openings, combined with a lack of human disturbance and adjacent forest cover make this adjacent area suitable for TES habitat enhancement. 1318 133 Combined Vegetation and TES assesment