Quality & Safety GLP. 44 q&more 02/14

Similar documents
-Regulation (EC) No.1394/2007 -Regulation (EC) No. 668/2009

Good Clinical Practice (GCP): how does a laboratory that supports a clinical trial ensure compliance with these Regulations

Advanced-therapy medicinal products: new competencies in hospital pharmacy Seminar PH4. Relevant Financial Relationships - None

CUSTOMER AND SUPPLIER ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES FOR 21 CFR 11 COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT. 21 CFR Part 11 FAQ. (Frequently Asked Questions)

EU Annex 11 US FDA 211, 820, 11; other guidelines Orlando López 11-MAY-2011

Understanding GxP Regulations for Healthcare

Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco

Regulatory Overview Annex 11 and Part 11. Sion Wyn Conformity +[44] (0)

Curriculum Vitae Dr. Joachim Schoch-Bösken. jsb-validierung Zwischen den Bächen 9 D Rheinfelden

GMO Technology Conference

GxP Auditing, Remediation, and Staff Augmentation

GxP Auditing, Remediation, and Quality System Resourcing

Individualised medicine: regulatory challenges

Di Renzo Regulatory Affairs ROME - MILAN - LONDON

Introduction to 21 CFR 11 - Good Electronic Records Management

References Concept. Principle. EU Annex 11 US FDA , (g), (i), 11 Orlando Lopez 2/15/11. Old Annex 11.

How to support compliance with GAMP 5

GxP Auditing, Remediation, and Staff Augmentation

White paper: Code of GMP Chapter 4 Documentation - PIC/S versus EU

ABPI response to European Commission consultation on advanced therapy medicinal products

Standard Operating Procedures Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice

Guide to Scientific and Regulatory Advice for GXP activities

KINGSMANN CARE GROUP

US FDA: CMC Issues for INDs

A.1 Contents file 4 to 5 A.1 (1)

Structure and content of an IMPD. What is required for first into man trial?

For analytical laboratories. A primer Good laboratory practice and current good manufacturing practice

LEVERAGING YOUR VENDORS TO SUPPORT DATA INTEGRITY:

EUROPEAN COMMISSION ENTERPRISE AND INDUSTRY DIRECTORATE-GENERAL. EudraLex The Rules Governing Medicinal Products in the European Union

Compliance & Validation Validation of Software-as-a-Service (SaaS Solutions)

Reflection paper on co-development of pharmacogenomic biomarkers and Assays in the context of drug development

Non-clinical documentation Overview of Requirements

Overview of Good Food Laboratory Practices

Challenges during the development of ATMPs

GMP On Site Series. GMP Essentials

Cell and Gene Therapy Medicinal Product Management Act (Draft) General Information

Development of non-substantially manipulated cell-based ATMPs 1 : flexibility introduced via the application of the risk-based approach

Track III: International Clinical Trials: Global Compliance Norms and EU Focus

Risk-based Approach to Part 11 and GxP Compliance

Explanatory note on general fees payable to the European Medicines Agency

GCP Basics - refresher

Due diligence in the European medical devices industry

Regulating Cell Therapy: An Ex-Regulators Perspective

The interface between Good Clinical Practice and Good Manufacturing Practice

EU scientific regulatory support mechanisms and initiatives for innovation in drug development: the EMA perspective

INTEGRATED STUDIES, SCIENCE AND BUSINESS VALLEY SANTAKA CENTRE FOR THE ADVANCED PHARMACEUTICAL AND HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES.

MASTER VALIDATION PLAN PROCEDURE DRAFT DRAFT OF A POSSIBLE COMPUTER SYSTEMS VALIDATION MASTER PLAN PROCEDURE

ACVM Requirement. Registration Information Requirements

COMPUTERISED SYSTEMS

Quality Manual. Index

CREATING TOMORROW S SOLUTIONS BIOPHARMACEUTICALS I CONTRACT MANUFACTURING WACKER BIOTECH: THE MICROBIAL CMO

Pharmabiotics: a Regulatory Hurdle in Europe

Impacto de las Nuevas Tendencias Regulatorias en la Producción de Parenterales. Innovacion en Packaging Primario

PRAXIS. A publication by Bioengineering AG

Data Reliability - Internet

Work plan for the GMP/GDP Inspectors Working Group for 2017

Regional GMP Strengthening Workshop for Indian Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and State Regulators

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY. EudraLex. Volume 4

REQUEST FOR AUTHORISATION TO THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY: REQUEST FOR OPINION OF THE ETHICS COMMITTEE:

Update on the IVDR. Sue Spencer

Consultation Paper. European Commission Public Consultation on Regulation (EC) No 1394/2007 on Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products

AAMI Quality Systems White Paper: Comparison of 21 CFR Part 820 to ISO 13485:2016 1

Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)

MEDICAL DEVICE CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS AND ISO 14155

Five years as EMA Liaison at US FDA

Textvergleich. Verglichene Dokumente MEDIA3917.pdf. ICH_Q10_Step4.pdf

Christian Gausepohl, Frank Böttcher. GMP Focus. Managing Contract Manufacturers and Testing Labs. PDF Download. Excerpt from the GMP MANUAL

SHORT COURSE. Practical Considerations for Biomarker Bioanalysis: Scientific and Regulatory Perspective SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 17

General European OMCL Network (GEON) QUALITY MANAGEMENT DOCUMENT

How did it evolve? o Public disasters, serious fraud and abuse of human rights. o Trials of War criminals-nuremberg code 1949

TECHNOLOGIES & SERVICES FOR THERAPEUTIC ANTIBODY DEVELOPMENT

Quality Risk Management (ICH Q9): WHO Model for Sustainable Quality Medicines

Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials for more effective Healthcare

European Regenerative Medicine Firms & Their Strategic Approaches. Michael Morrison University of York

The rules governing medicinal products in the European Union. Presentation and content of the dossier Edition

EUROPEAN COMMISSION ENTERPRISE DIRECTORATE-GENERAL QUESTIONS. and ANSWERS

Q10 PHARMACEUTICAL QUALITY SYSTEM

Health Care Logistics: an Enabler of Change BioLogistics in a Changing Healthcare World Northwestern University Transportation Center

DATA INTEGRITY ASSURANCE AS KEY FACTOR FOR SURVIVING CORPORATE AUDITS AND REGULATORY INSECTIONS

Meeting future challenges for pharmaceutical plants today

Human Research Protection Program Good Clinical Practice Guidance for Investigators Regulatory File Essential Documents

UNANNOUNCED EU MEDICAL DEVICE AUDITS BY NOTIFIED BODIES: IMPACT ON SUPPLIERS

EU and FDA GMP Regulations: Overview and Comparison

Overview of Amgen s CQP Commissioning and Qualification Program Steve Wisniewski Principal Compliance Consultant, CAI Past Chairman ISPE C&Q COP

Blackbox for sensitive freight.

European Medicines Agency Perspective

Clinical Trials application process, legislation & guidelines

KFDA Regulatory Framework on Biopharmaceuticals - Focus on Biosimilar

Challenges of Analytical Method Transfer in the Pharmaceutical Industry

Regulatory Expectations, Standards & Guidelines

THE R&D LABORATORY THAT BOOSTS YOUR DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS

GLP Computerized Systems Updates from OECD Guidance. Dr. Michael Regehr, BASF Corporation 28 JAN 2016, NAICC, Orlando

Impact of WHO Guidelines on GMP for Blood Establishments

FDA Public Hearing: Approval Pathway for Biosimilar. Products. November 2-3, 2010

Annex 14 WHO guidelines for drafting a site master file 136

Your partner in the pharmaceutical industry

Production-based pharmacist a fascinating job.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION ENTERPRISE AND INDUSTRY DIRECTORATE-GENERAL. EudraLex The Rules Governing Medicinal Products in the European Union

It s simple. USB data logger testo 184. Easy temperature monitoring and uninterrupted quality documentation in the transportation of pharmaceuticals.

Transcription:

Quality & Safety GLP 44 q&more 02/14

More than keeping a lab notebook GLP regulations and their new role in the approval of medicines for advanced therapies (ATMPs) Dr Katja Schellenberg, Translation Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Leipzig, Germany q&more 02/14 45

Quality & Safety GLP Before a medicine can be approved for clinical trials, it is subjected to a tightly regulated development process monitored by the relevant bodies. And for good reason: the turmoil surrounding the drug thalidomide and the cases of fraud in toxicological drug testing exposed by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulatory agency in the 1970s both gave rise to a demand for a regulatory framework designed to guarantee the reliability and recognition of the results obtained in such trials. GAP GMP GDP GCP GCLP GLP GAMP GDP GEP GPP Fig. 1 Other GxP variants The ABC of GxP As well as the pharmaceutical industry itself, companies in the life sciences sector, and in the food, chemicals and cosmetics industries must also follow the regulations set out by what has come to be known as good working practice (GxP). The GxP regulations serve the purpose of quality assurance and thus protect the patient and/or consumer by encouraging prevention-oriented improvements in product quality. The scope of application for GxP guidance (fig. 1) covers fields as diverse as good laboratory practice (GLP), good clinical practice (GCP) and good manufacturing practice (GMP). In the EU, these quality management systems guarantee the use of traceable processes and compliance with the very highest standards of quality, from the development and approval of a drug right through to its final production. Preclinical trials have the task of first establishing the safety of the active ingredient - Good Agricultural Practice - Good Manufacturing Practice - Good Distribution Practice - Good Clinical Practice - Good Clinical Laboratory Practice - Good Laboratory Practice - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice - Good Documentation Practice - Good Engineering Practice - Good Pharmacovigilance Practice (as regulated by the GLP framework) before the drug can then be tested in a clinical trial in patients (regulated in turn by the GCP framework). The production of the approved drug must then comply with the standards of GMP. Good laboratory practice (GLP) As well as governing the collection of pivotal safety data for the active ingredient contained in a drug, the standards for good laboratory practice are also applied to the non-clinical safety testing of substances in veterinary drugs, cosmetic products, food and feed additives, pesticides, biocides and industrial chemicals. The substances defined as test items by GLP can either stem from a synthetic/chemical source or equally be of a natural or biological origin. The aim of GLP testing is to demonstrate the harmlessness of the test items for humans and the environment. The GLP regulations thus constitute a quality assurance system that enables the tracking of who did what, when, how and with which tools/methods for each step of a safety testing procedure. Nor is GLP merely a method for keeping a detailed lab book. The core articles of GLP anchored in the German Chemicals Act (Annex I to Section 19a, para. 1) define conditions for personnel and physical space, test facility infrastructure, details of planning, execution and reporting on a GLP test, requirements for the equipment, reagents and materials used, as well as the retention and archiving of all documentation and test items relevant for the test. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the US Food and Drug Agency both play a major role in defining the actual GLP directives themselves. In Germany, they are monitored and audited by state-level regulators. 46 q&more 02.14

GLP in practice In business practice, the required standards present a challenge in terms of the cost-effectiveness and acceptance of a GLP test facility. While personnel requirements initially seem very high, they are nonetheless necessary, since every function within GLP must be replaceable without any restrictions or overlapping of functions. Personnel trained in GLP and their respective deputies must be provided for (fig. 2). This personnel ranges from the GLP study director, who is responsible for the planning, implementation as far as the final GLP test report and bears responsibility for compliance with GLP regulations, the test personnel who conduct testing and are responsible for the quality and reliability of the data, and the quality assurance team, which monitors conformity with GLP-compliant execution of a test procedure. Division of authority also applies: work steps or documents are always carried out and/or released by at least two individuals. Standard operating procedures (SOPs) must be created, which unambiguously describe the performance of test procedures, the operation of equipment and the creation of the SOPs themselves. In this way, non-specialist staff would be capable of carrying out the instructions even if this is not actually permitted within the GLP framework. Other materials may include forms and checklists, with which dated signatures can be captured, so as to ensure that the work steps have actually been performed in accordance with the SOPs. The items of equipment used in GLP testing must also have been calibrated and qualified. The environmental conditions e.g. as provided by lab rooms, cold stores or incubators must be documented, so as to exclude deviations from predefined conditions in SOPs. ATMPs: a new challenge facing the GLP regulations Complementing conventional medicines, progress in biomedical research has produced a new class of medicines, known as Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs). ATMPs can be further subdivided into three groups. Quality assurance* Head of the test facility(*) Study director* Archiving officer(*) Test personnel Test personnel Test personnel Fig. 2 Organisational chart for a GLP test facility. GLP sets out a clear cut staffing structure that includes the head of the test facility, the study director and test personnel. Quality assurance and the archiving officer work as independent roles.* A mandatory deputisation policy is required for a number of positions. This procedure is essential in order to ensure the transparency of the execution process and the reliability of the data collected. In normal i.e. uncertified day-to-day lab work, deviations of over ten percent from the target temperature of a thermocycler (fig. 3), in the individual cavities or at various levels within a cooling unit are not uncommon, for example. The impact of these deviations on trial results (defined as raw data within GLP) can be momentous. Fig. 3 Qualification of a thermocycler. Equipment used within GLP must be both calibrated and qualified. q&more 02.14 47

Quality & Safety GLP Katja Schellenberg completed her studies for a Bachelor of Science in Molecular Biotechnology from TU Dresden before graduating from the international degree programme Molecular Medicine at Charité Universitätsmedizin (Berlin) with an M.Sc. in 2009. Funded by a grant from Charité, she then completed her doctoral work at Berlin s Freie Universität and Charité Universitätsmedizinin in the field of molecular chronobiology at the Institute for Medical Immunology. Having acquired additional professional qualification in GLP and a distance learning course in the field of quality management, she has been study director for non-clinical services and safety testing at Leipzig s Translation Centre for Regenerative Medicine since January 2014. Her particular responsibilities include the planning and execution of testing in accordance with the principles of GLP, as well as project support and coordination work for research-based services. The first group comprises gene therapy treatments, where the drug contains a recombinant nucleic acid or regulates a nucleic acid sequence. Groups 2 and 3 comprise cells or tissue whose substance has been processed for its clinical application or whose function in the recipient is not the same as its function in the donor. While the pharmacological, immunological or metabolic effects of somatic cell gene therapy are used for the treatment, prevention or diagnosis of diseases, biotechnologically processed tissue products act to aid the regeneration or restoration of human tissue or serve to replace it. With Regulation 1394/2007 EC, EU law-makers have given ATMPs the same status as conventional medicines. Accordingly, non-clinical safety testing is also required as part of the approval process for gene therapy products, somatic cell treatments and biotechnologically processed tissue products. In accordance with Directive 2001/83 EC, this testing must meet the quality standards of good laboratory practice. An adaptation of the GLP regulations 48 q&more 02/14

Fig. 4 Test facility staff at the Translation Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Leipzig. GLP requires secure levels of staffing. is therefore required. Cell identity and purity, cell migration and in vivo stability, as well as the potential for tumour formation are just some of the issues requiring clarification in GLP-compliant testing, and require a new generation of GLP test facilities. An example is offered by the Translation Centre for Regenerative Medicine (TRM), based in Leipzig. The TRM is an interdisciplinary research centre that develops advanced diagnostic and therapy processes for regenerative medicine, and translates these into medical practice. research laboratories (fig. 4). To complement in vitro testing, in vivo trials in small and large animals in accordance with GLP regulations are soon to become part of the test facility s portfolio. katja.schellenberg@trm.uni-leipzig.de Bibliography German Chemicals Act Drugs for advanced therapies brochure, Paul Ehrlich Institute, June 2012. Whitepaper " Good Laboratory Practice : A look behind the scenes", Binder GmbH, August 2012. www.trm.uni-leipzig.de Photo: fotolia.com Ekaterina Shilova The internal test facility, an elementary component for the translation into practice, will soon be submitting an application for GLP certification. In line with the Centre s profile, the test facility has been specifically oriented on the performance of GLP-compliant pre-clinical ATMP safety testing over the last few months and is now already offering its service to external partners as well as internal q&more 02/14 49