Scanpower Limited. Pricing Methodology Disclosure. For Pricing Effective 1 April 2010 to 31 March 2011

Similar documents
Eastland Network Limited. Pricing Methodology Disclosure

Counties Power Limited

POWERNET LIMITED LINE PRICING METHODOLOGY

Public disclosure of WEL Networks 1 April 2012 pricing methodology

AURORA ENERGY LTD. Use-of-System Pricing Methodology

PRICING METHODOLOGY DISCLOSURE. For Year Commencing 1 April 2016

Executive Summary. Transition to Time of Use Pricing

Distribution Pricing Methodology Disclosure

DISCLOSURE OF DISTRIBUTION PRICING METHODOLOGY APPLICABLE FROM 1 APRIL 2017

Pursuant to the Electricity Distribution Information Disclosure Determination 2012

Pricing Methodology Disclosure. For Prices Applying from 1 April 2018

Submission to the Electricity Authority

ELECTRICITY PRICING METHODOLOGY 2011

Pricing Methodology Disclosure

Methodology for deriving delivery prices

Electricity Distribution Business Pricing Methodology

Pricing Methodology and Compliance with Pricing Principles

PRICING METHODOLOGY DISCLOSURE 2018/ February 2018

PRICING METHODOLOGY. For the Period: 1 April March 2020

1. Introduction Background Purpose Scope of the Tariff Structure Statement... 3

Wellington Electricity Lines Limited

Pricing Methodology. For Delivery Prices, effective as at 1 April 2018

Pricing Methodology: 1 April 2017

PRICING METHODOLOGY DISCLOSURE 2013/14

)(ewura. Energy and Water Utilities Regulatory Authority. In the matter of Application by the TANZANIA ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY LTD

Pricing Methodology for Gas Distribution Services. From 1 October 2016

Wellington Electricity Lines Limited

PacifiCorp Renewable Portfolio Standard Oregon Implementation Plan 2011 through 2015

Wellington Electricity Lines Limited

Annual Pricing Proposal

Pricing Methodology.

Pricing Methodology for Gas Distribution Services. From 1 October 2018

South African Distribution Code

Customer Capital Contributions Policy

HORIZON ENERGY DISTRIBUTION LIMITED ANNUAL COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

Policy for determining capital contributions on Vector s electricity distribution networks. From 1 December 2017

Ovo Energy Consolidated Segmental Statement

Distributed Generation (DG) Connection Standard

Improving the way we price our network services. Consultation paper

Use-of-System Pricing Methodology. 31 March 2017

Electricity Tariff Reform in Uttar Pradesh, India. Challenges & Key Findings May 2018

Proposed Tariff Structure Statement

ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE AND RATE DESIGN STUDY

Superior Propane Responses to the IR #1 from Seascapes

Pricing Policy Applicable from 1 April 2018

NEPRA. (Supply of Electric Power) Regulations, 2015 (:)

Uncontrolled Document when printed. Refer to internet for latest version. Disclaimer refer

Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback on the working paper on the application of ACOT payments.

Price Application Policy ABN

Commercial and Industrial Use Tariffs. Codes 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50

Pricing methodology Electricity distribution network. From 1 April 2015

Demand based network tariffs offering a new choice

COUNCIL POLICY BACKGROUND

Submission: Second Issues Paper Transmission Pricing Methodology; issues and proposal

EXTERNAL REVENUE. Updated: EB Exhibit E1 Tab 1 Schedule 2 Page 1 of STRATEGY

Policy for determining capital contributions on Vector s electricity distribution networks. From 1 February 2016

KOSOVO ENERGY CORPORATION J.S.C. TARIFF APPLICATION FOR 2010

Transparency of Charge Components

NATIONAL ELECTRICITY RULES ELECTRICITY CONNECTION FOR RETAIL CUSTOMERS CHAPTER 5A. Page 615

Electricity Supply Agreement

STATEMENT OF CHARGES FOR CONNECTION TO NORTHERN IRELAND ELECTRICITY NETWORKS DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM. Effective from 1 st October 2017 Version 1.

(2) isolated operation with standby service provided by the Company by means of a doublethrow

Transmission Pricing Methodology: CBA

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

Electricity Distribution Rate Design for Commercial & Industrial Customers

Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) Example Project Valuation Model User Guide

CitiPower Connection Policy

EMBEDDED COST OF SERVICE Kim Wissman Executive Director Ohio Power Siting Board On behalf of NARUC

ANNEXURE TO THE TARIFF ORDER PASSED BY MPERC FOR FINANCIAL YEAR

Distribution Cost of Supply (DCoS) Model Metholology and Application. The application of the DCoS Model in the tariff setting process

E.ON s UK Consolidated Segmental Report for the year ended 31 December 2013

NETWORK USE OF SYSTEM CHARGES FOR CHP GENERATORS AND AUTOPRODUCERS PROPOSED DIRECTION BY COMMISSION FOR ENERGY REGULATION

Joint TSO/DSO Group Processing Approach Pricing Principles Guidelines

SCE and CPA JOINT RATE COMPARISONS

Pricing Methodology: 1 April 2014

REVISED TARIFF STRUCTURE STATEMENT. ActewAGL Distribution Electricity Network

TasNetworks Distribution Connection Pricing Policy Final AER approved Commencing 1 July 2017

Distribution - Reset RIN, Basis of Preparation

Annual Price Review Gas distribution network

CAS-4 COST ACCOUNTING STANDARD ON COST OF PRODUCTION FOR CAPTIVE CONSUMPTION

Capacity Market Regulation Feedback Form

Election Handbook for Third Parties, Their Financial Agents and Auditors

Corporate Governance Center

Jemena Electricity Networks (Vic) Ltd

EVOENERGY 2017/18 STATEMENT OF TARIFF CLASSES AND TARIFFS

Statement of Use of System Charging Methodology for. Western Power Distribution (South Wales) plc. (April 2008)

CONSULTATION PAPER: TRANSMISSION PRICING. November 2013

Newfoundland Power Marginal Cost of Electricity Service Study

Electricity Authority Work Programme. 1 July June June 2017

Electricity Prices in the Tennessee Valley

Distribution Cost of Supply (DCoS) Model. Methodology and Application. The application of the DCoS Model in the tariff setting process

ENERGY RETAIL CODE. Version 10

Revised Tariff Structure Statement OVERVIEW PAPER. ActewAGL Distribution Electricity Network. 4 October 2016

Renewable Energy Plan 2013 Biennial Review Lansing Board of Water & Light MSCP Case No. U-16619

Solar feed-in tariff

Reconciliation Report

MASSACHUSETTS ELECTRIC COMPANY NANTUCKET ELECTRIC COMPANY TARIFF FOR BASIC SERVICE

LINE PRICING METHODOLOGY

Pricing Methodology for Gas Distribution Services

Distribution Code Definitions

Transcription:

Scanpower Limited Pricing Methodology Disclosure For Pricing Effective 1 April 2010 to 31 March 2011 Page 1 of 7

Introduction 1. The purpose of this document is to describe the methodology used by Scanpower Limited in setting its distribution and transmission charges, as required by Section 23 of the Electricity Information Disclosure Requirements 2004 issued 31 March 2004 and consolidating all amendments to 31 October 2008. 2. The primary objectives of Scanpower Limited s approach to network pricing are: To allocate costs fairly between user groups To establish a fair range of charges To provide appropriate demand based pricing signals where possible To achieve a rate of return acceptable to owners (Scanpower Customer Trust) To appropriately recover pass through costs such as transmission charges To meet regulatory requirements relating to fixed daily charges / low-user rates 3. The components of this disclosure, which in total describe the Scanpower pricing methodology, include: Disclosure of revenue requirements Determination of customer charging groups Identification of costs and associated drivers Allocation of costs to customer groups Derivation of charges Rationale for structure of fixed and variable charges Calculation of Annual Revenue Requirement 4. The following table summarises the components included in the annual revenue requirement calculation: Page 2 of 7

Table One Calculation of Annual Revenue Requirement Description Amount Operations & Maintenance Costs $777,091 Administration & Corporate Costs $1,012,802 Depreciation Charges $904,830 Cost of Capital / Return to Owners $2,000,000 Transpower Charges (net of LRR) $1,700,616 Regulatory Costs / Levies (including EC) $36,000 Total Revenue Requirement $6,431,339 5. Line item balances are derived from the operating budgets for the 2010 to 2011 financial year. In the case of cost of capital / return to owners, the amount is equal to that agreed with the Scanpower Customer Trust in the Statement of Corporate Intent for the year ending 31 March 2011. Identification / Explanation of Costs 6. Operations & Maintenance is a direct cost and relates to network asset maintenance, outage response, asset management, design, planning, and customer / public liaison. 7. Administration & Corporate is an indirect cost and relates to overheads such as Board and Executive costs, audit fees, insurances, and similar items. 8. Depreciation Charges reflect the annual charge to the accounts for network and related fixed assets. 9. Cost of capital / return to customer owners represents the anticipated annual distribution of returns to customers by way of the annual network discount mechanism. The amount is established through consultation with the Scanpower Customer Trust and is recorded in the annual Statement of Corporate Intent. 10. Transpower charges are transmission costs applied by the national grid operator. They are stated here net of loss rental rebates which are offset as a credit against total budgeted transmission costs. Page 3 of 7

11. Regulatory costs / levies include amounts paid to the Electricity Commission, Commerce Commission, Ministry of Economic Development, and the Electricity & Gas Complaints Commission Scheme. Consumer Grouping for Pricing Purposes 12. For pricing purposes, consumer groups have been split into domestic and commercial categories. This enables identification of residential supplies for the purposes of complying with low user tariff requirements. 13. In regard to residential low user tariffs, the decision was made to apply a low fixed daily charge component to all domestic supplies; i.e. not greater than 15 cents per day. Ease of understanding and reduced billing complexity were the underlying drivers behind this. 14. For commercial customers, consumer categories have been established on the basis of installed capacity and annual consumption. Both these measures correlate with the amount of asset used for each consumer group. 15. The table below summarises the consumer groupings for pricing purposes. Table Two Consumer Grouping for Network Pricing Purposes Pricing Group Quantity Description D1 4,700 Standard Domestic (0-15kVA) C1 1,272 Standard Commercial (>8kVA) C1.2 414 <2kVA Commercial (pumps, railway bells etc) C1.5 375 2-8kVA Commercial (small sheds etc) C3 14 Large Commercial (100,000 500,000 kwh pa) C4 7 Large Commercial (500,000 2,000,000 kwh pa) C5 2 Large Commercial (2,000,000 3,500,000 kwh pa) C6 2 Large Commercial (3,5000,000 + kwh pa) 16. The quantity of installations in each category is stated as at 1 April 2010 and is derived from the National Registry and cross referenced to Scanpower s billing system. 17. Therefore, the load / consumption characteristics shown in the table above prescribe the method / criteria for determining which pricing category a consumer is in. Page 4 of 7

In regard to the Domestic / Commercial split, domestic consumers are deemed to be permanent places of residence as opposed to business premises. Allocation of Costs to Customer Groups 18. Costs are allocated to customer groups on the basis of installed capacity. Given the relative simplicity of the Scanpower network design (no zone substations), this is used as a correspondingly straightforward, yet appropriate, allocation basis. 19. The table below summarises the allocation of costs, by type, to the consumer groupings identified in the pricing structure. Included are the installed capacity ratings for each group based on actual installed transformer size. Table Three Allocation of Costs / Revenue Requirements to Consumer Pricing Groups Cost of Group Capacity OM Costs Admin Deprec. Cap. Transpower EC Costs Rev. Req. D1 31,650 $373,579 $486,894 $434,988 $961,480 $817,554 $17,307 $3,091,802 C1 17,567 $207,351 $270,246 $241,436 $533,659 $453,775 $9,606 $1,716,072 C1.2 1,440 $16,997 $22,153 $19,791 $43,745 $37,197 $787 $140,670 C1.5 2,584 $30,500 $39,752 $35,514 $78,498 $66,748 $1,413 $252,424 C3 1,500 $17,705 $23,076 $20,616 $45,568 $38,747 $820 $146,531 C4 2,970 $35,056 $45,690 $40,819 $90,224 $76,718 $1,624 $290,131 C5 1,350 $15,935 $20,768 $18,554 $41,011 $34,872 $738 $131,878 C6 6,775 $79,968 $104,225 $93,114 $205,814 $175,006 $3,705 $661,831 65,836 $777,091 $1,012,802 $904,830 $2,000,000 $1,700,616 $36,000 $6,431,339 Fixed / Variable Cost Structure 20. In terms of the structure of fixed and variable pricing, as previously noted domestic (D1) pricing has been set such that all customers have a fixed daily charge of 15 cents, so as to comply with regulatory low user tariff requirements. With general increases in consumption since this policy was adopted, as shown in the table below the fixed / variable split for domestic consumers is 9.24% / 90.76%. 21. In the case of commercial customers, the fixed / variable split has been to some extent based on historical precedent, which has been a 30 / 70 cost ratio. Over time, with movements between consumer groups and changes to consumption patterns, this ratio has changed. Page 5 of 7

Table Four Split of Fixed and Variable Costs by Consumer Pricing Group Class Fixed Revenue Fixed Percentage Variable Revenue Var. Percentage Total D1 $277,595 9.24% $2,726,287 90.76% $3,003,882 C1 $467,518 27.42% $1,237,674 72.58% $1,705,192 C1.2 $69,965 50.37% $68,928 49.63% $138,893 C1.5 $87,270 34.91% $162,698 65.09% $249,968 C3 $35,607 22.40% $123,340 77.60% $158,947 C4 $85,101 27.06% $229,366 72.94% $314,467 C5 $20,758 14.49% $122,488 85.51% $143,246 C6 $229,590 32.03% $487,149 67.97% $716,739 TOTAL $1,273,405 19.80% $5,157,934 80.20% $6,431,339 22. The rationale for a fixed charging component to is to reduce the impact of seasonal fluctuations in electricity consumption, which can either favourably or adversely impact actual revenues. Given a relatively static annual revenue requirement this is considered to be a prudent pricing policy. Other Information 23. Scanpower calculates variable kwh on grid exit point volumes. Therefore, end use consumption data should be adjusted by the appropriate loss factor (disclosed in the schedule of prices) to arrive at billable volumes. 24. The rationale for this is to reduce complexity in monthly billing as individual ICP level data and consumption calculations are not necessary. Furthermore, GXP volumes are reconciled independently and therefore appropriate for billing purposes. 25. In February 2010 the Electricity Commission released a document entitled Distribution Pricing Principles and Information Disclosure Guidelines. In this document the Commission prescribes a number of principles for distribution pricing. As a result, Scanpower will be reviewing its network pricing structure and pricing methodology in the coming year. Page 6 of 7

Compliance Matrix EIDR 2004 Section Description Document Reference 23(a) Describe the methodology used to Entire document, paragraphs 1 calculate prices charged. to 24. 23(b) Disclose the calculation of annual revenue requirement including numerical values. Paragraphs 4 5 and Table 1 23(c) State consumer groups used for pricing Paragraph 15, Table 2 purposes. 23(c)(i) Rationale for customer grouping. Paragraphs 12 17 23(c)(ii) Method for determining customer price Paragraph 15 group 23(c)(iii) Statistics relating to each group in methodology. Table 2 (kva / kwh criteria / ICPs per group) Table 3 (installed capacity by group) 23(d) Allocation and basis for allocation of costs Paragraphs 18 19, Table 3 / revenue requirement to groups including numerical values. 23(e) Proportion of fixed to variable charges and associated rationale. Paragraphs 20 22, Table 4 Page 7 of 7