Qualifying SPR immunogenicity assays Dr. Christian Kühne

Similar documents
Validation of a concentration assay using Biacore C

Immunogenicity. How to deal with? Nathalie Macé Sanofi, Biomarkers & Biological analyses Unit

Immunogenicity of Therapeutic Proteins. Steven J Swanson, Ph.D. Executive Director, Clinical Immunology

Your bridge to. better medicines

Performance of a fast Surface Plasmon Resonance based MAb quantification method

The World Leader in SPR Technology. Jimmy Page, PhD, Biacore, Inc.

SURFACE PLASMON RESONANCE-BASED SYSTEMS

Methods to Determine the Binding of Bevacizumab to Fc receptors

Using Ligang-Binding Assay Sensitivity for Improved Matrix Tolerance and Related Parameters by Tailored Sample Dilution.

FDA Draft Guidance on Immunogenicity Testing

Assays and Strategies for Immunogenicity Assessment. Steven J Swanson, Ph.D. Executive Director, Medical Sciences Clinical Immunology, Amgen

Application of Biacore Technology

Successful transfer of ligand binding assays between different laboratories

Development of Multiplex Sensitive Anti-Drug Antibody Assays for CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Therapies

Challenges for Flow Cytometry in Regulated Bioanalysis

Antibody-Drug Conjugate Bioanalytical Assay Development:

Characterization of Small Molecule to Protein Binding

Fast, precise, and accurate

Challenges in receptor occupancy determination assays by flow cytometry in drug development

Gyrolab ADA assay protocol

Assays for Immunogenicity: Are We There Yet?

Precipitation and Acid (PandA) to Resolve the Drug and Target Interference Problems in Immunogenicity Assays

A Bridging Immunogenicity Assay Using SPARCL TM Technology

Ligand immobilization using thiol-disulphide exchange

TABLE OF CONTENTS. PLATFORM COMPARISONS GUIDE: How to Comprehensively Evaluate Your Bioanalytical Technology Options. Introduction...

Qualification of a DELFIA Assay for the Detection of Anti-mouse IgG Antibodies in Human Serum

Revised Immunogenicity Guideline: Assays and methods- Presentation of the draft guideline and introduction of the topics for discussion

Enhance Your Protein Interaction Research with A New Level of Bench-Top Productivity

ADCS, WHAT IS INDUSTRY DOING TODAY? AN OVERVIEW

CHALLENGES AND SOLUTIONS TO RECEPTOR OCCUPANCY STUDIES BY FLOW CYTOMETRY

Immunogenicity Assay Considerations

Influence of biological variability, assay signal, and outlier criteria on Immunogenicity cut points and clinical relevance

Qualification / validation of new lots of critical reagents for ADA assays: some practical examples

BIAffinity Application Note

Risk-based testing for anti-drug neutralizing antibodies during development of biological therapeutics

Towards an optimized in-vitro SPR assay for antibody Fcg receptor binding kinetics

BIA Experimental Designs

Reducing Non-Specific Binding in Surface Plasmon Resonance Experiments

Development of AlphaLISA Technology Assays for the Detection of Neutralizing Antibodies in Human Serum

Changes Impacting Bioequivalence Inspections: What s New?

Basic Biacore Course. Introduction to SPR technology. Biacore Training

AC Immune SA, Lausanne, Switzerland *For correspondence:

Protein-peptide Interaction by Surface Plasmon Resonance Eiji Ishii, Yoko Eguchi and Ryutaro Utsumi *

ProteOn XPR36 Quantikinetics: Antibody Concentration and Detailed Kinetic Analysis in a Single Experimental Cycle

Ligand Binding Assay strategies to support early drug development. Sarah Childs, Tina Panchal, Rose Edwards GlaxoSmithkline

Implementation of the Next Generation Effector Function Assays for Comparability Assessments

Case Studies on ultra-sensitive immunoanalytics based on Imperacer (Immuno-PCR) in clinical settings. Jan Detmers, Ph.D. (Chimera Biotec GmbH)

GE Healthcare Life Sciences. A year of interaction with Biacore X100

MANAGING THE CHALLENGES OF

Biosensing Probe for Quality Control Monitoring of the Structural Integrity of Therapeutic Antibodies

GE Biacore T Check that the waste bottle is empty.

Integrating an exploratory BM in an early clinical stage in Pharma R&D

Biacore X100. GE Healthcare Life Sciences. Biacore X100 Plus Package. Biacore X100 delivers:

Ccl19 (Mouse) ELISA Kit

ADA Assay Life-Cycle Management During Clinical Development

RayBio Human IgG1 ELISA Kit

6 th EBF Open meeting, Barcelona November 21st, 2013

IMPACT OF HIGHER ORDER COMPLEXES ON BIOMARKER TARGET QUANTITATION

What s the difference? Challenges in pre-clinical development of biologics

Instruction AB

4/10/2017. Agenda. Overview: Biomarker Industry. + Industry Overview + Biomarker Labs Overview + Biomarker Intended Use and Challenges

Immunogenicity of Biological products

Characterization of drug-plasma protein interactions using surface plasmon resonance

BioPhysics Assay Laboratory, Inc. ٠ 80 Webster Street ٠ Worcester MA ٠ Phone (508) ٠ Fax (508) ٠

Label-free interaction analysis in realtime using surface plasmon resonance

Supplementary Figure 1. Binding capacity of the nanoparticles. Protein A-coated magnetic nanoparticles were mixed with FITC-antibody (antibody

Strategies to Improve Drug Tolerance in Nab Assays

Placement of Biomarker Analysis in a CLIA or Bioanalytical Laboratory

FDA Immunogenicity Updates

RayBio Human TIMP-1 ELISA Kit

510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE

Biacore 8K. One solution for small molecule and biotherapeutic screening/characterization. GE Healthcare. Label-free interaction analysis

Evaluation of a promising new homogenous assay technology (SPARCL) and comparisons with MSD, using FSH as test substance

IgG1 (Human) ELISA Kit

Guidance for Industry

Cyfra 21-1 IRMA. Product information Information about other products is available at: Userś Manual DE52100

Bioanalytical LC-MS of monoclonal antibody therapeutics

GE Healthcare Life Sciences. Label-free interaction and stability analysis in vaccine design and development

European Bioanalysis Forum

2. Sample dilution: Tissue lysate and cell lysate sample should be diluted at least 5-fold with 1x Sample Diluent Buffer.

Strategies for Assessment of Immunotoxicology in Preclinical Drug Development

TECHNICAL BULLETIN. Mouse IGF-I ELISA Kit for serum, plasma, and cell culture supernatant. Catalog Number RAB0229 Storage Temperature 20 C

PHARMACEUTICAL BIOANALYSIS BIOANALYSIS SERVICES. Bioanalytical Expertise for Large and Small Molecules

ACE2 (Human) ELISA Kit

RayBio Mouse HGF ELISA Kit

Recommendations for the development and validation of confirmatory anti-drug antibody assays

GE Healthcare. Biacore X100. Getting Started

Biacore. Concentration Analysis Handbook

Biacore The high performance research system. Work with high sensitivity

Molecular Interactions Research

Design and Validation of a Non Cell-based Receptor Binding Assay for the Detection of Neutralizing Antibodies to a Biological Therapeutic

TNF (Pig) ELISA Kit. Catalog Number KA assays Version: 05. Intended for research use only.

Characterization of Critical Reagents for Ligand Binding Assays

Cxcl13 (Mouse) ELISA Kit

Fgf2 (Mouse) ELISA Kit

Guideline/Guidance Comparison on Ligand Binding Assays (LBA)

Guideline/Guidance Comparison on Ligand Binding Assays (LBA)

Hgf (Mouse) ELISA Kit

NDA Advisory Services Ltd

Ccl20 (Mouse) ELISA Kit

Transcription:

Qualifying SPR immunogenicity assays Dr. Christian Kühne

Bioagilytix / IPM Biotech global CRO for large molecule bioanalysis supporting pre-clinical & clinical studies Biomarker, Pharmacokinetics, Immunogenicity 2

Bioagilytix / IPM Biotech Implemented SPR technology for: GLP and GCP-compliant Immunogenicity testing Drug candidate profiling GMP batch release testing 3

Bioagilytix / IPM Biotech Implemented SPR technology for: Immunogenicity testing 4

Bioagilytix / IPM Biotech Implemented SPR technology for: Immunogenicity testing ADA Screening binding of ADA s to immobilized drug 5

Bioagilytix / IPM Biotech Implemented SPR technology for: Immunogenicity testing ADA Screening binding of ADA s to immobilized drug ADA Confirmatory differentiation between specific and unspecific binding by adding excess drug in mobile phase 6

Bioagilytix / IPM Biotech Implemented SPR technology for: Immunogenicity testing ADA Screening binding of ADA s to immobilized drug ADA Confirmatory differentiation between specific and unspecific binding by adding excess drug in mobile phase ADA Isotyping determination of Ig subclass by adding secondary anti-ig antibody on top 7

Introduction Biologic produced with a His-tag for purification His-tag enzymatically removed after purification Immunogenic byproducts/residuals? His enzyme His 8

Introduction If ADA s are formed, authorities ask against which target. His His 9

Biacore T200 CM5 Chip: Blank His His Fc1 Fc2 Fc3 Fc4 10

Chip ph Scouting G-CSF His-G-CSF His RU 3000 Result Plot Best results 2500 2000 G-CSF: ph 4.5 His-G-CSF: ph 4.5 His: ph 4.0 Relative Response - Stop 1500 1000 10 mm Acetate 4 10 mm Acetate 4.5 10 mm Acetate 5 10 mm Acetate 5.5 500 0-500 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 File & Cycle 11

Ligand Immobilization 74 RU 1960 RU 1900 RU Blank His His Fc1 Fc2 Fc3 Fc4 12

Sensorgram & Report Points RU 1000 800 Sensorgram Example G-CSF Fc4-1 sample regeneration 600 400 Response (0 = baseline) 200 0-200 -400 baseline stability -600-800 -1000 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Time s 13

Chip Regeneration Test Binding response 14

Chip Regeneration Test Baseline response 15

Chip Stability RU 220 Stability 200 180 Relative Response - Stability late 160 140 120 100 80 1 2 3 4 60 40 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Cycle 16

Minimum Required Dilution (MRD) His 5% serum His-G-CSF 5% serum G-CSF 5% serum Positive Controls anti-gcsf and anti-his from 10 µg/ml to 1.25 µg/ml in 100 % serum 17

Minimum Required Dilution (MRD) His 10% serum His-G-CSF 10% serum G-CSF 10% serum Positive Controls anti-gcsf and anti-his from 10 µg/ml to 1.25 µg/ml in 100 % serum 18

Minimum Required Dilution (MRD) His 20% serum His-G-CSF 20% serum G-CSF 20% serum Positive Controls anti-gcsf and anti-his from 10 µg/ml to 1.25 µg/ml in 100 % serum 19

Cut Point G-CSF (FCP = NC.IS + 8.3 RU) RU 80 G-CSF 60 30 individual negative patient sera Relative Response - stability 40 20 0-20 Control sample Sample outlier removal by box plot analysis Mean of NC (in-study) + CF -40 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Cycle 20

Cut Point G-CSF (FCP = NC.IS + 8.3 RU) RU 80 G-CSF 60 Relative Response - stability 40 20 0 Control sample Sample -20-40 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Cycle 21

Cut Point His-G-CSF (FCP = NC.IS + 1.6 RU) RU 140 His-G-CSF 120 100 30 individual negative patient sera Relative Response - stability 80 60 40 20 0 Control sample Sample outlier removal by box plot analysis Mean of NC (in-study) + CF -20 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Cycle 22

Cut Point His-G-CSF (FCP = NC.IS + 1.6 RU) RU 140 His-G-CSF 120 Relative Response - stability 100 80 60 40 20 Control sample Sample 0-20 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Cycle 23

Cut Point His (FCP = NC.IS + 19.5 RU) RU 25 His 20 15 30 individual negative patient sera Relative Response - stability 10 5 0-5 -10-15 Control sample Sample outlier removal by box plot analysis Mean of NC (in-study) + CF -20-25 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Cycle 24

Cut Point His (FCP = NC.IS + 19.5 RU) RU 25 His 20 15 Relative Response - stability 10 5 0-5 -10-15 Control sample Sample -20-25 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Cycle 25

Sensitivity G-CSF G-CSF calculated assay sensitivity [µg/ml] Ligand Analyte anti-gcsf anti-his His n.a. 8.301 His-G-CSF 0.120 2.198 G-CSF 0.937 n.d. Positive Controls anti-gcsf and anti-his from 10 µg/ml to 0.3125 µg/ml in 100 % serum 26

Sensitivity His-G-CSF His - G-CSF calculated assay sensitivity [µg/ml] Ligand Analyte anti-gcsf anti-his His n.a. 8.301 His-G-CSF 0.120 2.198 G-CSF 0.937 n.d. Positive Controls anti-gcsf and anti-his from 10 µg/ml to 0.3125 µg/ml in 100 % serum 27

Sensitivity - His His calculated assay sensitivity [µg/ml] Ligand Analyte anti-gcsf anti-his His n.a. 8.301 His-G-CSF 0.120 2.198 G-CSF 0.937 n.d. Positive Controls anti-gcsf and anti-his from 10 µg/ml to 0.3125 µg/ml in 100 % serum 28

Reproducibility - intra assay G-CSF - 5 duplicates in one run - antibody mix injected - all CV s below 20% red line: mean NC + 2x SD -> acceptance criteria set 10 µg/ml PC mix to monitor chip stability 29

Reproducibility - inter assay G-CSF Positive Control 10 µg/ml - 3 independent runs (duplicates each) - merged in one evaluation file - antibody mix injected - all CV s below 20% High intra assay sample 5 µg/ml Low intra assay sample 1,25 µg/ml red line: mean NC + 2x SD Negative Control 0 µg/ml -> acceptance criteria set 10 µg/ml PC mix to monitor chip stability 30

Summary Summary Cut Point His His-G-CSF G-CSF CF 19.5 RU 1.6 RU 8.3 RU 31

Summary Summary Cut Point His His-G-CSF G-CSF CF 19.5 RU 1.6 RU 8.3 RU calculated assay sensitivity [µg/ml] Ligand Analyte anti-gcsf anti-his His n.a. 8.301 His-G-CSF 0.120 2.198 G-CSF 0.937 n.d. 32

Summary Summary Cut Point His His-G-CSF G-CSF CF 19.5 RU 1.6 RU 8.3 RU calculated assay sensitivity [µg/ml] Ligand Analyte anti-gcsf anti-his His n.a. 8.301 His-G-CSF 0.120 2.198 G-CSF 0.937 n.d. Reproducibility Intra CV (highest) His 5.2 % His-G-CSF 3.6 % G-CSF 2.8 % Reproducibility Inter CV (highest) His 4.8 % His-G-CSF 3.4 % G-CSF 3.6 % 33

Sample Analysis Sample analysis performed: comparison between pre-dose and post-dose samples post-dose had to be 3x higher than pre-dose to be considered drug induced / treatment emergent 34

Thank You Thank you for your attention 35