Environmental Site Assessment for Limited Remediation Protocol

Similar documents
H&H Job No. DS0-05. April 29, South Tryon Street Suite 100 Charlotte, NC

Atlantic RBCA (Risk-Based Corrective Action) for Petroleum Impacted Sites in Atlantic Canada. Version 3. User Guidance

Vapour Intrusion Regulatory Framework and Case Law Review

The Environmental Management and Protection (Saskatchewan Environmental Code Adoption) Regulations

Discharge and Discovery Reporting Standard. Saskatchewan Environmental Code

August 14, Dear Mr. Chapman:

Endpoint Selection Standard. Saskatchewan Environmental Code

Proposed Changes to EPA s Spreadsheet Version of Johnson & Ettinger Model (and some new spreadsheet tools)

Guidelines for Assessing and Managing Petroleum Hydrocarbon Contaminated Sites in New Zealand (Revised 2011)

March 16, Dear Mr. Chapman:

Is this the maturation Phase of Vapor Intrusion Investigations?

Risk Management Plan Quail Dry Cleaners DSCA ID No Charlotte, Mecklenburg County H&H Job No. DS0-29D. Table of Contents

1. What is the cleanup level look-up table and where can I find it?

Code of Practice for Land Treatment of Soil Containing Hydrocarbons

Best management practices for vapor investigation and building mitigation decisions

Part 1: Property Ownership, Property Information and Owner s Certifications

ENVIRONMENTAL SCREENING REPORT

PROPOSED DECISION DOCUMENT. CE - E. 19th St. Station Voluntary Cleanup Program New York, New York County Site No. V00542 October 2017

WASTE ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA AND DEVELOPMENT OF SOIL TRIGGER VALUES FOR EPA-LICENSED SOIL RECOVERY FACILITIES

Grid Soil Sampling Outside of Source Areas

Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation. Contaminated Sites Database

November 8, 2016 International Petroleum Environmental Conference. Tim Nickels Pastor, Behling & Wheeler, LLC

Appendix B AMEC Laboratory Quality Assurance/Control Program

Hazardous Materials December 9, Hazardous Materials Existing Conditions

ASH MANAGEMENT PLAN. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 4, Atlanta, GA. Mr. Joe Alfano, Remedial Project Manager

Executive Summary. 2. Property Investigations Groundwater Sampling Soil Sampling Soil Vapor Sampling 5

Steve Mailath, M.Sc., P.Geol. April 10, 2014 WATER NATURAL RESOURCES ENVIRONMENT INFRASTRUCTURE ENERGY

VAP Introduction to the Voluntary Action Program. Division of Emergency and Remedial Response

This report was prepared by Stanley Abraham, Bioremediation of Hydrocarbon-Contaminated Soil

August Vapor Intrusion Guidance FAQs

DRAFT Alberta Risk Management Plan Guide

GENERAL PERMIT WMGR098 BENEFICIAL USE OF WASTE FOUNDRY SAND AND SAND SYSTEM DUSTS

January 17, 2017 Page 1 of 1. Desert Springs Bottled Water PO BOX 273 Echo, OR 97826

Register of Contaminated Land Consent Conditions

FINAL PLAN OF REMEDIAL ACTION

The Dirt on Excess Soil Across Canada How Will Brownfields Be Affected?

Oregon Guidance for Assessing and Remediating Vapor Intrusion in Buildings

Treatment Technologies for Site Cleanup: Annual Status Report (Twelfth Edition)

Introduction to Brownfields: Site Assessment and Cleanup

Terms of Reference for Assessment of Water System Infrastructure and Water Supply Sources for Semi-Public Water Systems

A REVIEW OF VAPOR INTRUSION GUIDANCE BY STATE

Environmental Management Chapter ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER DIVISION - WATER SUPPLY PROGRAM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE

VAPOR INTRUSION ASSESSMENT REPORT PUBLIC SCHOOL 152Q ND STREET QUEENS, NEW YORK 11377

Acronyms and Abbreviations... v. 1.0 Introduction Chemical Use Areas, Chemical Use Area Clusters, and Corrective Measures Study Areas...

SOIL REMEDIATION OF A FORMER POWER PLANT SITE IN TULITA, NORTHWEST TERRITORIES

Excavation of petroleum-contaminated soil and tank removal sampling Petroleum Remediation Program

ATLANTIC RBCA (Risk-Based Corrective Action) Ecological Screening Protocol for Petroleum Impacted Sites in Atlantic Canada

7.0 EVALUATION OF REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES

VAPOR INTRUSION TECHNICAL GUIDANCE

McKissack & McKissack Washington, DC

BC CSR Omnibus Amendment: A Case Study on the Impacts to Environmental Investigation and Remediation

PROPOSED SAN FRANCISCO GREEN BUILDING CODE AMENDMENTS 2016 Edition

BURLINGTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOLID WASTE WASTE CLASSIFICATION REQUEST FORM AND INSTRUCTIONS

State of Alaska DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION DIVISION OF SPILL PREVENTION AND RESPONSE CONTAMINATED SITES PROGRAM

Mill Street Corridor Assessment/Cleanup Overview

Interpreting Analytical Results

Bioremediation Product Series

A PROTOCOL FOR THE DERIVATION OF GROUNDWATER QUALITY GUIDELINES FOR USE AT CONTAMINATED SITES PN 1533 ISBN PDF

Mobile Water Treatment Trailer

Vapor Intrusion Regulatory Guidance and IRIS Updates with Mitigation Case Studies. Richard J. Rago Haley & Aldrich 20 June 2012

EXPORT SOIL-MATERIAL QUALITY REQUIREMENTS

CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION DEBRIS DISPOSAL SITE GUIDELINES

Site Source & Uncontaminated Soil Certifications: Assessment Strategies to Minimize Costs ENVIRONMENT : INFRASTRUCTURE : DEVELOPMENT

ISOTEC Case Study No. 67 ISCO TREATMENT PROGRAM: IMPACTED GROUNDWATER TREATMENT UTILIZING ACTIVATED SODIUM PERSULFATE

-FINAL- PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT FORMER CONSOLIDATED RAMBLER MINE PROPERTY BAIE VERTE NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR.

EPA S 2015 vapor intrusion guides What do they mean for your facility?

Project Background. Project Purpose

Top 10 Risks of the Clean Fill Dump Site

SURPLUS SOIL-MATERIAL REUSE REQUIREMENTS

Incremental Sampling Methodology (ISM)

Railroad Commission of Texas

James Studer, 2 Barry Ronellenfitch, 2 Adam Mabbott, 2 Heather Murdoch, 2 Greg Whyte, and 3 Ian Hakes. REMTECH 2008 at Banff, Alberta

GOVERNMENT NOTICE NO. published on THE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACT (CAP. 191) REGULATIONS. (Made under Section 144, 145 and 230 (s))

Site Map Investigative Areas (IAs) IA-3

SUPPLEMENTAL PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT APPLEBY MALL 5111 NEW STREET AND 499 & 505 APPLEBY LINE BURLINGTON, ONTARIO

In Situ, Low Temperature Thermal Remediation of LNAPL with Pesticides and Other Recalcitrant Compounds

Top 10 Risks of the Clean Fill Dump Site

Case Study: Starkey Junk Yard, Uhrichsville. VAP Annual Training September 12, 2003

Standard Operating Procedures: Building Feature Evaluation and Sampling Revision 1 Santa Susana Field Laboratory Ventura County, California

Naval Base Point Loma Secretary of Defense Environmental Award Environmental Restoration - Installation. Narrative

THE TECHNICAL STANDARDS AND SAFETY ACT, 2000, S.O. 2000, c. 16 ( the Act ) and

Chapter 21 Stormwater Management Bylaw

Technology Overview KLOZUR PERSULFATE

Inorganic Chemicals (IOCs)

Vapor Intrusion: A State s Perspective

Vapor Extraction / Groundwater Extraction (VE/GE) System Initial Report

PHASE III ESA, HHERA AND RAP, NORTHWEST POINT, LABRADOR. Appendix 4a. Site Drawings. East Bulk Fuel Storage Site

Material Characterization Report

DOCUMENTATION OF DUE CARE COMPLIANCE REPORT

Development of Potentially Contaminated Land Guidance Note for Developers, Agents and Consultants

U.S. EPA s Vapor Intrusion Database: Preliminary Evaluation of Attenuation Factors

Speaker Lowell Kessel GEO Incorporated - Gas Thermal Remediation Services

USERS GUIDE. Guidelines for Assessing and Managing Petroleum Hydrocarbon Contaminated Sites in New Zealand

Understanding Gas Protection Measure Selection within Waterproofing Systems. John Naylor Technical Director

Skim Pit Closure Report for the Hickert No. 1A Lease Washington County, Colorado COGCC Remediation # 9065

Soil vapor surveys can be used for a number of purposes, including the following:

Spills to the Environment and Reporting Policy

APPENDIX 2. Nova Scotia Department of Environment and Labour Environmental Assessment Terms and Conditions for Environmental Assessment Approval

Soil Treatment Facility Design and Operation for Bioremediation of Hydrocarbon Contaminated Soil. Version 1.0

Updated Massachusetts Indoor Air Quality Threshold Values: A Case Study

Transcription:

Environmental Site Assessment for Limited Remediation Protocol Adopted by the Minister of Environment Pursuant to the Contaminated Sites Regulations Adopted by the Minister of Environment, Hon. Sterling Belliveau, on July 3, 2013, effective as of July 6, 2013 Document No.: PRO-200 Revision: July 6, 2013

TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS... i 1 OBJECTIVES... 1 2 DEFINITIONS... 1 3 SELECTION OF LIMITED REMEDIATION ASSESSMENT CATEGORY... 2 4 L1 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT REQUIREMENTS... 2 4.1 Restrictions for Application of L1 Environmental Site Assessment... 2 4.2 Minimum L1 Environmental Site Assessment Requirements... 3 4.2.1 Soil Sampling Requirements for L1 Environmental Site Assessment... 3 4.2.2 Water Sampling Requirements for L1 Environmental Site Assessment... 4 4.2.3 Soil Vapour, Sub-Slab, and Indoor Air Quality Sampling Requirements for L1 ESA. 5 4.2.4 Laboratory Requirements for L1 Environmental Site Assessment... 5 4.2.5 Reporting Requirements for L1 ESA... 6 5 L2 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT REQUIREMENTS... 6 5.1 Use of L2 ESA... 6 5.2 Minimum L2 ESA Requirements... 6 6 L3 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT REQUIREMENTS... 6 6.1 Minimum L3 ESA Requirements... 7 7 THIRD PARTY ASSESSMENT AND DELINEATION REQUIREMENTS FOR L1, L2, AND L3 ESA... 7 8 REQUESTS FOR TIME EXTENSIONS... 7 APPENDICES... 8 Appendix 1... 8 Checklist CHK-200 ESA for Limited Remediation Checklist... 8 i

1 OBJECTIVES The is applicable to the requirements specified in Section 13(1)(a) of the Contaminated Sites Regulations respecting duties of a site professional to conduct an environmental site assessment when carrying out limited remediation. The objectives of this protocol are to: a) Prescribe the requirements for conducting an environmental site assessment for limited remediation based on the level of potential risk. b) Present the minimum environmental site assessment requirements for three categories of limited remediation: L1, L2 and L3. c) Provide regulatory requirements for reporting information from an environmental site assessment completed under limited remediation, including a summary checklist submission, CHK-200: ESA for Limited Remediation Checklist. The is intended for use by a site professional, the qualifications for which are as defined in Section 5 of the Contaminated Sites Regulations. 2 DEFINITIONS Atlantic RBCA: Exposure Management: means the current versions of Atlantic Risk Based Corrective Action guidance documents including the Petroleum Hydrocarbon Impacted Sites User Guidance and software modelling tool, Guidance for Soil Vapour and Indoor Air Monitoring Assessments from Atlantic RBCA and Guidelines for Laboratories as published by the Atlantic Partnership in RBCA Implementation committee. means the measures used to protect site receptors at risk from contaminant exposure. These measures can include long-term monitoring to verify non-exposure, engineering controls, physical controls, or administrative controls, all of which potentially require long-term management. L1 Environmental Site Assessment: means the process used to assess contamination of soil following a release from a single source with single or multiple contaminants of concern. L2 Environmental Site Assessment: means the process used to assess contamination of soil, groundwater, sediment, or surface water from a single source with single or multiple contaminants of concern. 1

L3 Environmental Site Assessment: means the process used to assess contamination of soil, groundwater, sediment, or surface water associated with single or multiple sources and/or contaminants of concern. The L3 environmental site assessment process presence and extent of contaminants associated with all potential sources of contamination identified on the property. 3 SELECTION OF LIMITED REMEDIATION ASSESSMENT CATEGORY The following conditions must be evaluated prior to selecting the appropriate category of limited remediation environmental site assessment (L1, L2, or L3): a) source and type of contaminant(s) b) volume of contaminant(s) c) affected media (soil, groundwater, surface water, sediment) Based on an evaluation of the above, the applicable L1, L2, or L3 environmental assessment category must be selected. The restrictions associated with each category and the minimum environmental site assessment requirements of L1, L2, and L3 categories are presented in Sections 4, 5, and 6, respectively. If at any time it becomes evident the conditions are more complex and no longer meet the requirements of the initial category selected, the assessment must proceed to a more acceptable limited remediation assessment category. It is recognized that the person responsible may choose to address contamination on a site by using full property remediation as described in Section 15(1) of the Contaminated Sites Regulations or limited remediation as described in Section 13(1) of the regulations. If at any time the person responsible chooses to switch from the limited remediation pathway to the full property remediation pathway, or vice versa, all assessment requirements of the pathway selected must be performed. 4 L1 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT REQUIREMENTS 4.1 Restrictions for Application of L1 Environmental Site Assessment An L1 ESA is not to be applied if any of the following conditions exist on site: a) contamination has extended below the water table, in which case all potential pathways in the subsurface must be investigated to ensure contamination has not come into contact with groundwater b) any of the following contaminants exceeding Tier 1 Environmental Quality Standards (EQS) criteria as defined in protocol PRO-100, Notification of 2

Contamination Protocol, are present at a depth greater than 0.3 m from the surface: i) Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB s) ii) Tetrachloroethylene (also known as Perchloroethene, PCE) iii) Trichloroethylene (TCE) iv) cis 1,2- Dichloroethylene (cis-dce) v) Vinyl Chloride vi) vii) Total Mercury Dioxins and Furans (non-background as determined in Section 5.2.4 of protocol PRO-100, Notification of Contamination Protocol c) if contamination has directly affected any of the following: (i) watercourse (ii) wetland (iii) potable water supply. See Figure 3 of protocol PRO-100, Notification of Contamination Protocol, in order to determine groundwater potability. d) where inaccessible petroleum contaminated soil, with benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene (BTEX) or total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), exceeding the Tier 2 Pathway Specific Standards (PSS) as defined in protocol PRO-500, Remediation Levels Protocol, for soil leaching to groundwater pathway remain below a building structure on a potable site, e) where contaminated soil has come in contact with bedrock on a potable site, f) sites where measures greater than short-term emergency action and/or temporary excavation are required to address vapours within a building 4.2 Minimum L1 Environmental Site Assessment Requirements All contamination must be delineated to appropriate Tier 1 EQS criteria specified in protocol PRO-100, Notification of Contamination Protocol. 4.2.1 Soil Sampling Requirements for L1 Environmental Site Assessment Confirmatory soil samples collected following remedial excavations may be used to satisfy the soil sampling requirements of an L1 ESA. Minimum soil sampling requirements that must be met are: a) Confirmatory soil samples must be collected from the side walls and floor of the excavation in accordance with Table 1, Section 3, (Confirmatory Sampling Requirements) of protocol PRO-700, Conformation of Remediation Protocol 3

b) Where contaminated soil below any part of a building footprint is proposed to be left in place, full delineation of contamination and verification through soil vapour, sub-slab, and/or indoor air sampling that the indoor air quality is not affected above an acceptable level must be completed. The concentration, volume, and location of any contaminated soil remaining below a building as well as the findings of the air quality assessment must be documented in form FRM-700, Record of Site Condition Form, and filed with the Minister. c) In cases where contaminated soil has extended to bedrock on nonpotable sites and no evidence of free product is present, the site professional must use their professional judgement to determine whether a groundwater assessment is required. In cases where it is determined that a groundwater assessment is required, the assessment shall proceed to an L2 ESA. In cases where it is determined that a groundwater assessment is not required, the soil vapour/indoor air sampling requirements outlined in Section 4.2.3 of this protocol must be met. d) Sampling procedures must be documented. A composite sampling procedure for soil sampling of volatile organic compounds is not acceptable. e) Sampling data quality assurance and quality control procedures must be documented. Field methods used to collect samples, preserve samples, and control potential cross contamination of samples must also be documented. 4.2.2 Water Sampling Requirements for L1 Environmental Site Assessment The following minimum groundwater sampling requirements must be met: a) On sites where there is a potable well or spring supplied water source, the well or spring must be analyzed for the contaminant being addressed in the soil in accordance with the laboratory requirements identified in Section 4.2.4 as described below. b) Any other water samples collected must also be analyzed in accordance with the laboratory requirements identified in Section 4.2.4 below. c) Sampling protocols must be documented. d) Sampling data quality assurance and quality control procedures must be documented. Field methods used to collect samples, preserve samples, and control potential cross contamination of samples must also be documented. 4

4.2.3 Soil Vapour, Sub-Slab, and Indoor Air Quality Sampling Requirements for L1 ESA Soil vapour, sub-slab, and indoor air sampling work must follow the latest version of the Atlantic RBCA Guidance for Soil Vapour and Indoor Air Monitoring Assessments, available as a stand-alone document from the Atlantic RBCA website (atlanticrbca.com). The rationale, approach, and results (including lab reports) of all soil vapour, subslab, and indoor air monitoring assessments must be documented in an environmental site assessment report. Evaluation of soil vapour, sub-slab, or indoor air must be accomplished through the collection and interpretation of empirical site data in the following circumstances: where contaminants in soil above the Tier 1 EQS as specified in protocol PRO-100, Notification of Contamination Protocol, (including soil above the Tier 1 EQS and below the applicable Tier 2 PSS as specified in PRO- 500, Remediation Levels Protocol) are left below a building structure where contaminated soil, containing gasoline or volatile organic compounds has extended to bedrock and a groundwater assessment has not been conducted on a non-potable. In such instances, all potentially affected buildings (dwellings) located within 30 meters of the source must be assessed where a building (dwelling) has a dirt floor, open sump, or rock foundation 4.2.4 Laboratory Requirements for L1 Environmental Site Assessment Appropriate laboratory analysis must be conducted for samples collected, including the following: a) Laboratories performing analysis must be accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 standards (and subsequent revisions) by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) or the Canadian Association of Laboratory Accreditation (CALA). All routinely required analyses must appear on the laboratory s certificate. b) All sampling and analysis must be in accordance with laboratory approved recommendations concerning sample containers, storage and preservation. c) Appropriate selection of laboratory analytical methods to ensure adequate conformance to data quality objectives, assessment endpoints (ecological or human health), and method/reportable detection limits. d) In the case of petroleum hydrocarbons, analysis shall conform to Atlantic RBCA Guidelines for Laboratories, and the latest revisions of the Tier 1 and Tier 2 Petroleum Hydrocarbon Methods. 5

e) For all other contaminants, the analytical methods recommended are those in the latest guidance from the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) concerning sampling, analysis, and data management for contaminated sites. 4.2.5 Reporting Requirements for L1 ESA The environmental site assessment, remedial action plan, and confirmation report requirements of the Contaminated Sites Regulations may be compiled and documented in a single report for limited remediation using L1 environmental site assessment. With the exception of the evaluation process for inaccessible soils below building structures outlined in this protocol, including the use of Tier 2 PSS tables found in PRO-500, Remediation Levels Protocol where applicable, all contamination must be remediated to appropriate Tier 1 EQS criteria specified in protocol PRO-100, Notification of Contamination Protocol, or Tier 2 Unconditional criteria specified in protocol PRO-500, Remediation Levels Protocol. The time requirements specified in the Contaminated Sites Regulations must be followed. 5 L2 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT REQUIREMENTS 5.1 Use of L2 ESA L2 ESA may be used to assess contamination in soil, groundwater, sediment, or surface water. L2 may be used to assess single or multiple contaminants of concern. L2 is intended to be used to address contamination associated with a known release or event from a single source. The L2 ESA process supports remediation to appropriate Tier 1 EQS or Tier 2 criteria. Where institutional and/or engineered controls are effective in eliminating the exposure pathway between the source and the receptor, long-term exposure management may be employed. 5.2 Minimum L2 ESA Requirements To fulfill the L2 ESA requirements, a Phase 2 ESA must be conducted on all portions of the property or properties affected by the contaminant event. For the purpose of an L2 ESA, a Phase 1 ESA is not required to be completed, as assessment is limited to portions of properties affected by a known release or event. All other aspects of protocol PRO- 400, Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment Protocol must be followed. 6 L3 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT REQUIREMENTS 6 L3 ESA may be used to assess contamination in soil, groundwater, sediment, or surface water associated with single or multiple sources and/or contaminants. L3 may be used in situations where a record of site condition is being sought to address the entire property. L3 ESA allows remediation of contamination to appropriate protocol PRO-100 Notification of Contamination Protocol Tier 1 EQS or protocol PRO-500 Remediation

Levels Protocol Tier 2 criteria. Where institutional and/or engineered controls are effective in eliminating the exposure pathway between the source and the receptor, long-term exposure management may be applied. Upon completion of the L3 ESA process the presence and extent of contaminants associated with all sources identified on the property will have been assessed. 6.1 Minimum L3 ESA Requirements To fulfill L3 ESA requirements, the following must be completed: Phase 1 ESA in accordance with protocol PRO-300, Phase 1 ESA Protocol, Phase 2 ESA in accordance with protocol PRO-400, Phase 2 ESA Protocol 7 THIRD PARTY ASSESSMENT AND DELINEATION REQUIREMENTS FOR L1, L2, AND L3 ESA All contamination must be delineated to appropriate Tier 1 EQS criteria specified in protocol PRO-100 Notification of Contamination Protocol, including off site assessment. Prior to commencing third party delineation, written permission to access property for the purposes of off-site delineation must be obtained from the property owner(s). 8 REQUESTS FOR TIME EXTENSIONS To request a time extension for the completion of an L1, L2 or L3 ESA under Limited Remediation, in accordance with Section 13(1a) of the Regulations, form FRM-400, Request for Time Extension, contained within PRO-400 Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment Protocol must be completed in entirety by a Site Professional. Form FRM- 400, Request for Time Extension and the minimum supporting documentation prescribed therein must be submitted to the Minister within 150 days of filing form FRM-100, Notification of Free Product or Contamination. The documentation will be processed by the Minister. Acceptable submissions will result in an alternate date requirement for the completion of the environmental site assessment. The revised date to complete an environmental site assessment will be issued in writing by the Administrator or Inspector in accordance with the Contaminated Sites Regulations. 7

APPENDICES Appendix 1 Checklist CHK-200 ESA for Limited Remediation Checklist 8