Sub-Slab Sampling and Analysis to Support Assessment of Vapor Intrusion at the Raymark Superfund Site

Similar documents
Overview of Soil Gas Probe Emplacement & Sampling Methods

Empirical Data: Challenges and Future Directions

Evaluation of Spatial and Temporal Variability in VOC Concentrations at Vapor Intrusion Investigation Sites.

Soil Gas Sampling for Vapor Intrusion Assessments: Key Issues

ISOTEC Case Study No. 67 ISCO TREATMENT PROGRAM: IMPACTED GROUNDWATER TREATMENT UTILIZING ACTIVATED SODIUM PERSULFATE

Lessons from Petroleum Hydrocarbon and Chlorinated Solvent Sites Extensively Monitored for Vapor Intrusion

Case Study of Modeled and Observed TCE Attenuation from Groundwater to Indoor Air. Christopher G. Lawless Johnson Wright, Inc.

Vapor Intrusion Assessment A Comparative Analysis of Subsurface Vapor Sampling Methods

Examples of Data Collection Strategies and Methods

Soil Gas Analytical Methods (Overview, TAGA, Forensics)

New Data on Attenuation Coefficients for Crawl Spaces and Deep Soil Gas from the Lowry AFB Site, Denver, Colorado

PVI Risk Pathway: Sampling Considerations

Appendix A Analytical Methods for Air Sampling

Executive Summary. 2. Property Investigations Groundwater Sampling Soil Sampling Soil Vapor Sampling 5

ROUX ASSOCIATES, INC. Environmental Consulting & Management

Soil Vapor Installation

PASSIVE GROUNDWATER SAMPLING METHODS. Applications and Experience

H&H Job No. DS0-05. April 29, South Tryon Street Suite 100 Charlotte, NC

Emission Testing August 2013 EPA 4 Benzene Combustor Inlet/Outlet Testing

Abstract. Thomas R. Eschner and David Dinsmore, Woodard & Curran.

Use of Crawl Space Sampling Data and Other Lines of Evidence for Evaluating Vapor Intrusion

SCOTT Method TO-14A/15/17

Empirical Data to Evaluate the Occurrence of Sub-slab O 2 Depletion Shadow at Petroleum Hydrocarbon- Impacted Vapor Intrusion Sites

Proposed Changes to EPA s Spreadsheet Version of Johnson & Ettinger Model (and some new spreadsheet tools)

ABSTRACT: Principal Contact: Chris Lutes, ARCADIS, 4915 Prospectus Dr. Durham NC, 27713, , (fax),

Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Methods & Strategies

Case Studies of Innovative Use of Tracers, Indicators and Field GC/MS for Assessing the Vapor Intrusion Pathway

Passive Soil Vapor Extraction (PSVE) for VOC Remediation at the Metallurgical Laboratory (MetLab) June 2005 Progress Report

Sustainability; in Residential, Commercial and Industrial Buildings

SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005

PA Vapor Intrusion Guidance

Since I wrote Part 3 of this Collecting Reliable Soil-Gas Data series in LUSTLine #48, Nov 2004, the subject of vapor intrusion

Continental Aluminum Exposure Investigation Executive Summary

Available Laboratory Methods for Soil Gas Analysis

Vapor Intrusion Attenuation Factors Based On Long Term Monitoring Data

Best management practices for vapor investigation and building mitigation decisions

Indoor Air Quality Testing at the Middle River Complex. Indoor Air Quality Testing at the Middle River Complex. For More Information

In-Situ Remediation of Chlorinated Solvent Source Zone using ZVI-Clay Treatment Technology

Evaluation of Vapor Intrusion from a Subsurface Diesel Plume UsingM ultiple Lines of Evidence

Vapor Intrusion Issues

Thermal Remediation Services, Inc.

Certificate of Accreditation

Slide 1. Welcome to our Webinar: An Intro to the new Low Level MIP. we will begin shortly

2. Appendix Y: Vapor Intrusion Modeling Requirements (Appendix to Statewide health standard VI guidance in the Technical Guidance Manual)

Vapor Extraction / Groundwater Extraction (VE/GE) System Initial Report

Speaker Lowell Kessel GEO Incorporated - Gas Thermal Remediation Services

Site Profiles - View. General Information. Contaminants: Site Hydrology:

OPTIMIZATION OF A CHEMICAL OXIDATION TREATMENT TRAIN PROCESS FOR GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION. Gary Cronk, P.E., CHMM

U.S. EPA s Vapor Intrusion Database: Preliminary Evaluation of Attenuation Factors

Ground Water Screening Level (GWSL) 1,2 ug/l TCR = 1.0E-05/HQ =0.2. Sub-slab and Exterior Soil Gas Screening Level (SGSL) 1,2.

PROPOSED DECISION DOCUMENT. CE - E. 19th St. Station Voluntary Cleanup Program New York, New York County Site No. V00542 October 2017

Installation of Liquid Boot a spray applied membrane to reduce vapor intrusion of chlorinated solvents and radon

Soil Investigation for Volatile Organic Compound Soil To Groundwater Impact Site 1 - Privet Road Compound. NAS JRB Willow Grove Horsham, Pennsylvania

Is this the maturation Phase of Vapor Intrusion Investigations?

Soil vapor surveys can be used for a number of purposes, including the following:

PILOT PROJECT «ILE DE FRANCE»

Vapor Intrusion Risk Pathway: Updates & Hot topics

August 14, Dear Mr. Chapman:

FINAL INDOOR AIR QUALITY INVESTIGATION BUILDINGS A, B, C, AND VLS LOCKHEED MARTIN MIDDLE RIVER COMPLEX

Sampling and Analysis in Vapor Intrusion Investigations. Andy Rezendes, Technical Sales-Air Analysis

A REVIEW OF VAPOR INTRUSION GUIDANCE BY STATE

Case Study Palermo Well Field Use of Stable Isotopes Tumwater, Washington

Imagine the result. Sub-Slab and Indoor Air Sampling Work Plan. Motors Liquidation Company

Thermal Remediation Services, Inc.

UNDERSTANDING THE ROLE OF SEWER PREFERENTIAL PATHWAYS IN VAPOR INTRUSION. Thomas McHugh, Ph.D., D.A.B.T. Lila Beckley, P.G.

Use of Building Pressure Cycling in Vapor Intrusion Assessment

VAPOR INTRUSION ASSESSMENT REPORT PUBLIC SCHOOL 152Q ND STREET QUEENS, NEW YORK 11377

DOWEX OPTIPORE Adsorbents DOWEX OPTIPORE Adsorbent Cuts Costs of Cleaning Solvent from Soil Vapor Extraction Off-Gas

SUB-SLAB DEPRESSURIZATION SYSTEM DESIGN AND INSTALLATION

In Situ Thermal Remediation and Principles of Electrical Resistance Heating (ERH)

Screening Criteria to Evaluate Vapor Intrusion Risk from Lead Scavengers

Introduction to Brownfields: Site Assessment and Cleanup

AECOM tel 8000 Virginia Manor Road, Suite fax Beltsville, MD 20705

Presented at the SafeSpur Forum 18 November 2009, Chorley

IH Scan Packages Novi Laboratory

Electrical Conductivity & Hydraulic Profiling. The Combining of Two Subsurface Investigation Methods (With More to Come)

INDOOR AIR QUALITY MONITORING REPORT FOR BEVERLY HILLS HIGH SCHOOL BEVERLY HILLS, CALIFORNIA

Case Study Using Fenton s Reagent Under a Performance- Based Remediation Contract

Oregon Guidance for Assessing and Remediating Vapor Intrusion in Buildings

September 20, 2015 PN:

Volatile Organic Compounds in Solids PBM

Mr. Dan Emerson Construction Manager BRE Properties, Inc Shellmound Way, Ste. A Emeryville, CA Dear Mr. Emerson:

March 16, Dear Mr. Chapman:

EPA Internet Seminar

FINAL REPORT GROUND-WATER MONITORING FOR VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS WITHIN THE GALLATIN LOCAL WATER QUALITY DISTRICT. Prepared.

CASE STUDY OF THE EFFECT OF REVERSE MATRIX DIFFUSION ON REMEDIAL TIME FRAME AT A SUPERFUND SITE

Vapor Intrusion Regulatory Guidance and IRIS Updates with Mitigation Case Studies. Richard J. Rago Haley & Aldrich 20 June 2012

PHOTOGRAPHS. Project Number: OUTDOOR BACKGROUND SOIL GAS PORT INSTALL

DOCUMENTATION OF DUE CARE COMPLIANCE REPORT

Vapor Intrusion: A State s Perspective

MEMO. Kris Hinskey

Mixed Plume Remediation using EHC In-Situ Chemical Reduction and Oxidation Technologies

NGWA s Water Well Construction Standard: ANSI/NGWA 01-14

Subsurface Distribution of ZVI/EHC Slurry Validating Radius of Influence. Josephine Molin, PeroxyChem October

PHASE II SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION REPORT

Removal Assessment Report

FAIRCHILD AIR FORCE BASE (4 WASTE AREAS) SPOKANE, WA

Interpreting Analytical Results

MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 1800 Washington Boulevard Baltimore Maryland

Mobile Water Treatment Trailer

Transcription:

Sub-Slab Sampling and Analysis to Support Assessment of Vapor Intrusion at the Raymark Superfund Site Dominic DiGiulio Office of Research and Development National Risk Management Research Laboratory Ada, Oklahoma March 15, 2004

N Sub-Slab Sampling Locations Near the Raymark Superfund Site (15 house, 1 business) NF Raymark Facility Site HOUSATONIC RIVER Generalized Groundwater Flow Direction 400 0 400 Feet

N Geologic Cross-Sections NF Raymark Facility Site G H H G HOUSATONIC RIVER 400 0 400 Feet

WEST CONTRACT PLATING OU1 FORMER RAYMARK FACILITY Cross-Section G-G EAST ELEVATION (NGVD 1929) 100 80 60 40 20 0-20 -40-60 -80-100 -120 MW-303 (B) FILL 9.14 EOB AT - 22.7 FILL SAND. BARNUM AVE Fill Peat Till RR TRACK SAND Organic silt Clay Silt Sand Bedrock Gravel FILL FORMER TILO IND / STRATFORD SQ. SHOPPING CENTER FILL SAND MW-209 (S,D,B) INTERSECTION OF A-A 6.5 5.45.5 EOB AT - 88.74 GRAPHIC SCALE FILL SAND MW-210 (NEW S,D) ON RAMP TO I 95 SOUTH EOB AT - 29.62 FILL I - 95 SAND EOB AT - 73.47 0 20 0 200 VERTICAL MW-212 (S,M,D,B) INTERSECTION OF B-B FILL 3.33.4 3.53.53.53.5 3.3 3.3 3.3 HORIZONTAL EOB AT - 100 4.6 RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES (NO TOPO COVERAGE) SAND MW-214 (S,M,D) EOB AT - 35.95 POSS. TILL SHOREL INE HOUSATONI C RIVER Well Screen and corresponding groundwater elevation End of boring with corresponding elevation 100 80 60 40 20 0-20 -40-60 -80-100 -120 ELEVATION (NGVD 1929)

Primary Investigators in Raymark Study Dom DiGiulio U.S. EPA, ORD, NRMRL, Ada, OK Cindy Paul, U.S. EPA, ORD, NRMRL, Ada, OK Ron Mosley, U.S. EPA, ORD, NRMRL, RTP,NC Ray Cody, U.S. EPA New England Regional Office, Boston, MA Scott Clifford, U.S. EPA New England Regional Lab, North Chelmsford, MA Peter Kahn, U.S. EPA New England Regional Lab, North Chelmsford, MA Annette Lee, XDD Ltd. Kaneen Christensen, formerly of XDD Ltd.

Objectives and Status of Research at the Raymark Site in Stratford, CT Evaluate bias associated with commonly used ground-water sampling techniques for VOCs (Cindy Paul- ORD/NRMRL) Discrete Multi-Level Sampling (DMLS) System Sample cell Viton spacer

Ground-Water Profile at Monitoring Well 214S Using Discrete Multi-Level Sampling (DMLS) System Ground-Water Concentration (ug/l) 140 120 100 80 60 40 Specific Conductance (us/cm) Ground-Water Concentration (ug/l) 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 water table water table 4 5 6 7 MW-214 TCE (Q4, Q5 screening level = 5 ug/l) 1,1-DCE (Q4, Q5 screening level = 200, 280 ug/l) 1,1,1-TCA (Q4, Q5 screening level = 3300, 4700 ug/l) well sample = 55 ug/l well sample = 32 ug/l well sample = 21 ug/l 20 water table 1,1-DCE (ND) TCE = 0.6 ug/l 1,1-DCE=1.4 ug/l TCE = 2.2 ug/l 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Depth (m)

Objectives and Status of Research at the Raymark Site in Stratford, CT Evaluate bias associated with commonly used soilgas sampling techniques (Dom DiGiulio - ORD/NRMRL)

Objectives and Status of Research at the Raymark Site: Develop a sub-slab gas permeability testing protocol support sub-slab depressurization system design (ORD/NRMRL - Dom DiGiulio)

Objectives and Status of Research at the Raymark Site in Stratford, CT Develop a sub-slab sampling protocol and supporting data interpretation methods (Dom DiGiulio - ORD/NRMRL)

56 Objectives and Status of Research at the Raymark Site 72 Evaluate groundwater to indoor air and soil-gas to indoor air attenuation factors (Cindy Paul and Dom DiGiulio - ORD/NRMRL) 53 35 38 11 36 37 2 MW213 0 73 83 MW-214 66 95 100 feet 8 23 113 3 MW523 76 86 96 51 106 125 515 10 50 509 116 9 44 118 123 112 501 45 105 508 49 489 109 46 498 115 48 481 72 492 47 471 125 117 462 472 105 575 MW-526 605 121 520 124 52 550 560 6 71 122 580 600 N Soil-gas and ground-water research area Indoor air and sub-slab sampling Indoor air sample Monitoring well North Housatonic Soil-gas sample (slam-bar) Soil-gas sample (Geoprobe) Ground-water and/or soil-gas sample (Geoprobe)

Conservativeness of Constrained Version of the J&E Model (Q5) at Houses on North Housatonic Soil-Gas Ratios at North Housatonic 1.0E+02 1,1,1-TCA 1,1-DCE TCE Actual/Q5(2.0E-03) 1.0E+01 1.0E+00 1.0E-01

Primary Objectives of Sub-Slab Study Develop a protocol for sub-slab vapor probe installation Develop an algorithm to assess sources of indoor air contamination using: - indoor air data - outdoor air - sub-slab gas, and - soil-gas and/or ground-water data

Typical House at Stratford, Ct

Pre-Sampling Survey

Collecting an Outdoor Sample

Indoor Air Sampling: Collection of a Duplicate Sample

Locating Utilities: Sewer Line Exiting Under the Slab

General Schematic for Installation of Sub-Slab Vapor Probes Concrete Slab Recessed Threaded Cap Cement Grout Brass or Stainless Steel Threaded Fitting or Compression Fitting Brass or Stainless Steel Tubing Sub-slab soil

Drilling a Small Diameter Hole Through A Slab

Inner and Outer Holes

Applying Cement

Probe Used at the Raymark Site

Sources and Significance of Systematic Error: Probe construction materials as a source of VOCs Methanol Extraction of Brass Fittings and Cement Grout for Background VOCs

Sources and Significance of Systematic Error: Probe construction materials as a source of VOCs Use of a Field Probe Blank at the Raymark Site to Ensure that Probe not a Source of VOCs COMPOUND AMBIENT AIR SAMPLING PROBE FIELD BLANK Canister #6582 Canister #6581 (ppb/v) (ug/m3) (ppb/v) (ug/m3) 1,1, 1-Trichloroethane Acetone Benzene Carbon Tetrachloride Chloroform Dichlorodifluoromethane Ethylbenzene 0.58 3.2 4.5 J 11 J 0.15 L 0.47 L 0.09 L 0.42 L 0.10 L 0.50 L 0.66 3.3 0.20 L 0.87 L ND(0.21) ND(1.2) 3.1 J 7.3 J 0.15 L 0.47 L 0.09 L 0.44 L ND(0.20) ND(0.98) 0.59 2.9 ND(0.21) ND(0.91) Hexane 1.0 3.7 0.18 L 0.64 L Methyl-t-Butyl Ketone 0.23 0.81 0.47 1.7 Methylene Chloride 0.44 1.5 0.12 L 0.43 L Toluene 0.85 3.2 0.42 1.6 Trichlorofluoromethane 0.27 1.5 0.27 1.5 Trichlorotrifluoroethane 0.10 L 0.78 L 0.10 L 0.78 L m/p-xylenes 0.65 2.8 ND(0.41) ND(1.8) o-xylene 0.25 1.1 0.08 L 0.34 L NOTES: ND = Not detected above reporting limits L = estimated value, below the calibration range J = Estimated value Compounds in bold are project target analytes

Probe Design Now Used at Other Sites)

Sources and Significance of Systematic Error: Insufficient or Excessive Purging: Mass Balance dc = Q C C in dt V ( ) C(0) = C 0 purgevolume tq Cin C = = ln V C C in 0 out Purge Volumes 5 4 3 2 0.99 0.95 0.9 0.85 0.8 1 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 C o /C in

Sources and Significance of Systematic Error: Insufficient or Excessive Purging: Particle Tracking Tedlar bag sample 0-10 6-L Summa Canister Sample Simulated pressure differential (Pa), streamlines, and travel time (min) Below a slab during air sampling at 1 LPM -20-30 -40-50 L slab = 13 cm L water-table = 1000 cm K slab = 1.0 x 10-10 cm 2 K sub-slab = 5.0 x 10-08 cm 2 K soil = 5.0 x 10-08 cm 2 R w = 0.7 cm 2 g = 0.2-60 -70-80 -90-100 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Sources and Significance of Systematic Error: Insufficient or Excessive Purging: Void Under Slab V (L) D (ft) 1 1.5 2 2.1 3 2.5 4 2.9 5 3.3 6 3.6 7 3.9 8 4.2 9 4.4 10 4.6 11 4.9 12 5.1 13 5.3 14 5.5 15 5.7 Internal volume of sub-slab probe is insignificant (< 5 cm 3 ) Assume thickness of air space underneath slab is ¼

Sources and Significance of Systematic Error: Insufficient or Excessive Purging: Direct Sampling

Concentration as a Function of Sample Sequence 600 500 Concentration (ppbv) 400 300 200 100 1,1,1-TCA TCE 1,1-DCE c-1,2-dce 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Sampled Volume (L)

Sources and Significance of Systematic Error: VOC loss through tedlar bags Tedlar bag study at GWERD

On-Site GC Analysis of VOCs Using Tedlar Bags

Sampling Sub-Slab Gas with a 6-L Summa Canister

Sub-Slab Concentration (ppbv) 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Sources and Significance of Systematic Error: VOC loss through tedlar bags Comparison with TO-15 Analysis A B C A B C A B House A TO-15 (7/02) Tedlar Bag (7/02) Tedlar Bag (10/02) 1,1,1-TCA 1,1-DCE TCE c-1,2-dce 1,1-DCA C A B C A B C

Sampling Sub-Slab Gas with a 1-L Summa Canister

Sampling for O 2, CO 2 and CH 4 during Purging

Sources and Significance of Systematic Error: Selection of Sampling Locations

Sources and Significance of Systematic Error: Selection of Sampling Locations 180 House A Sub-Slab Concentration (ppbv) 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 A B C A B C A B C A B C TO-15 (7/02) Tedlar Bag (7/02) Tedlar Bag (10/02) A B C 0 1,1,1-TCA 1,1-DCE TCE c-1,2-dce 1,1-DCA

Outdoor/Indoor 1.0? Outdoor Algorithm to Identify sources of VOC in Indoor Air IND NO Indoor/Sub-Slab 1.0? Is VOC in GW or SG in vicinity of bldg? or IND Are Indoor/Sub-Slab ratios available for tracer compounds or radon? NO Outdoor/Indoor 0.33? Outdoor/Indoor 0.67? 0.33 < Outdoor/Indoor < 0.67? Indoor Outdoor Indoor- Outdoor Sub-Surface Is Indoor/Sub-Slab ratio range for tracer or radon? IND Not Subsurface IND NO Outdoor/Indoor 0.33? Outdoor/Indoor 0.67? 0.33 < Outdoor/Indoor < 0.67? Indoor or Indoor Subsurface Outdoor or Outdoor Subsurface Indoor-Outdoor or Indoor-Outdoor Subsurface

Subsurface as a Source of VOCs in Indoor Air (364 Housatonic) VOC Outdoor bsm t ratio m ean ratio m ean ratio GW likely TO-15 TO-15 outdoor/ sub-slab bsmt/ tedlar bsmt/ MW-525 primary 07/16/02 07/16/02 bsm t TO-15 sub-slab (ppbv) sub-slab 01/08/03 source (ppbv) (ppbv) (ppbv) TO-15 tedlar (ug/l) of VOC 1,1,1-TCA 0.58 3.80 1.5E-01 495 7.7E-03 741 5.1E-03 190 sub-surface 1,1-DCE ND(0.25) 2.30 < 1.1E-01 323 7.1E-03 425 5.4E-03 130 sub-surface TCE ND(0.25) 1.50 < 1.7E-01 215 7.0E-03 226 6.6E-03 130 sub-surface c-1,2-dce ND(0.25) 0.57 < 4.4E-01 81 7.1E-03 88 6.5E-03 60 sub-surface 1,1-DCA ND(0.25) 0.52 < 4.8E-01 70 7.5E-03 NA NA 61 sub-surface

Outdoor/Indoor 1.0? Outdoor Indoor/Sub-Slab 1.0? Outdoor/Indoor 0.33? Indoor Is VOC in GW or SG in vicinity of bldg? NO Outdoor/Indoor 0.67? Outdoor IND NO or IND Are Indoor/Sub-Slab ratios available for tracer compounds or radon? 0.33 < Outdoor/Indoor < 0.67? Indoor- Outdoor Sub-Surface Is Indoor/Sub-Slab ratio range for tracer or radon? IND Not Subsurface IND NO Outdoor/Indoor 0.33? Outdoor/Indoor 0.67? 0.33 < Outdoor/Indoor < 0.67? Indoor or Indoor Subsurface Outdoor or Outdoor Subsurface Indoor-Outdoor or Indoor-Outdoor Subsurface

Indoor Source of VOCs, Outdoor/indoor < 1 or indeterminate and indoor/sub-slab < 1 or indeterminate (364 Housatonic) VOC Outdoor bsmt ratio mean ratio mean ratio GW likely TO-15 TO-15 outdoor/ sub-slab bsmt/ tedlar bsmt/ MW-525 primary 07/16/02 07/16/02 bsmt TO-15 sub-slab (ppbv) sub-slab 01/08/03 source (ppbv) (ppbv) (ppbv) TO-15 tedlar (ug/l) of VOC CH2Cl2 0.44 3.90 1.1E-01 ND(21) > 1.9E-01 NA NA ND(10) indoor CHCl3 0.10 L 0.34 2.9E-01 ND(21) > 1.6E-02 NA NA ND(10) indoor MEK ND(0.26) 1.00 < 2.6E-01 ND(39) > 2.6E-02 NA NA ND(10) indoor MTBE 0.23 8.50 2.7E-02 ND(20) > 4.3E-01 NA NA 2.0 indoor heptane ND(0.24) 0.97 < 2.5E-01 ND(21) > 4.6E-02 NA NA ND(10) indoor benzene 0.15 L 0.80 1.9E-01 ND(21) > 3.8E-02 ND(8) IND ND(10) indoor toluene 0.85 5.30 1.6E-01 < 20 > 2.7E-01 ND(30) IND ND(10) indoor ethylbenzene 0.20 L 1.00 2.0E-01 ND(21) > 4.8E-02 NA NA ND(10) indoor m/p-xylene 0.65 3.70 1.8E-01 < 42 > 8.8E-02 NA NA ND(10) indoor o-xylene 0.25 1.50 1.7E-01 ND(21) > 7.1E-02 NA NA ND(10) indoor 1,2,4-TMB ND(0.24) 2.40 < 1.0E-01 ND(21) > 1.1E-01 NA NA ND(10) indoor 1,3,5-TMB ND(0.25) 0.77 < 3.2E-01 ND(21) > 3.7E-02 NA NA ND(10) indoor 4-Ethyltoluene ND(0.25) 1.70 < 1.5E-01 ND(22) > 7.7E-02 NA NA ND(10) indoor ethyl/vinyl acetate ND(0.48) 1.50 < 3.2E-01 ND(42) > 3.6E-02 NA NA ND(10) indoor

Outdoor/Indoor 1.0? Outdoor Indoor/Sub-Slab 1.0? Outdoor/Indoor 0.33? Indoor Is VOC in GW or SG in vicinity of bldg? NO Outdoor/Indoor 0.67? Outdoor IND NO or IND Are Indoor/Sub-Slab ratios available for tracer compounds or radon? 0.33 < Outdoor/Indoor < 0.67? Indoor- Outdoor Sub-Surface Is Indoor/Sub-Slab ratio range for tracer or radon? IND Not Subsurface IND NO Outdoor/Indoor 0.33? Outdoor/Indoor 0.67? 0.33 < Outdoor/Indoor < 0.67? Indoor or Indoor Subsurface Outdoor or Outdoor Subsurface Indoor-Outdoor or Indoor-Outdoor Subsurface

Indoor and Outdoor Sources of VOCs, Outdoor/indoor < 1 or indeterminate and indoor/sub-slab < 1 or indeterminate (364 Housatonic) VOC Outdoor bsmt ratio mean ratio mean ratio GW likely TO-15 TO-15 outdoor/ sub-slab bsmt/ tedlar bsmt/ MW-525 primary 07/16/02 07/16/02 bsmt TO-15 sub-slab (ppbv) sub-slab 01/08/03 source (ppbv) (ppbv) (ppbv) TO-15 tedlar (ug/l) of VOC CCl4 0.09 L 0.23 L 3.9E-01 ND(21) > 1.1E-02 NA NA ND(10) indoor-outdoor CCl3F(freon11) 0.27 0.82 3.3E-01 ND(21) > 3.9E-02 NA NA ND(10) indoor-outdoor CCl2F2(freon12) 0.66 1.10 6.0E-01 ND(21) > 5.2E-02 NA NA ND(10) indoor-outdoor CCl3CF3(freon113) 0.10 L 0.22 L 4.5E-01 ND(21) > 1.0E-02 NA NA ND(10) indoor-outdoor hexane 1.00 2.40 4.2E-01 ND(22) > 1.1E-01 NA NA ND(10) indoor-outdoor

Outdoor/Indoor 1.0? Outdoor Indoor/Sub-Slab 1.0? Outdoor/Indoor 0.33? Indoor Is VOC in GW or SG in vicinity of bldg? NO Outdoor/Indoor 0.67? Outdoor IND NO or IND Are Indoor/Sub-Slab ratios available for tracer compounds or radon? 0.33 < Outdoor/Indoor < 0.67? Indoor- Outdoor Sub-Surface Is Indoor/Sub-Slab ratio range for tracer or radon? IND Not Subsurface IND NO Outdoor/Indoor 0.33? Outdoor/Indoor 0.67? 0.33 < Outdoor/Indoor < 0.67? Indoor or Indoor Subsurface Outdoor or Outdoor Subsurface Indoor-Outdoor or Indoor-Outdoor Subsurface

Indeterminate but not Subsurface Sources of VOCs, Outdoor/indoor < 1 or indeterminate and indoor/sub-slab < 1 or indeterminate (364 Housatonic) VOC Outdoor bsmt ratio mean ratio mean ratio GW likely TO-15 TO-15 outdoor/ sub-slab bsmt/ tedlar bsmt/ MW-525 primary 07/16/02 07/16/02 bsm t TO-15 sub-slab (ppbv) sub-slab 01/08/03 source (ppbv) (ppbv) (ppbv) TO-15 tedlar (ug/l) of VOC PCE ND(0.25) 0.17 L < 1.5E+00 ND(21) > 8.1E-03 NA NA ND(10) IND-not sub-surf ace CHBrCl2 ND(2.2) 0.14 J,L < 1.6E+00 ND(190) > 7.4E-04 NA NA ND(10) IND-not sub-surf ace cyclohexane ND(0.50) 0.57 < 8.8E-01 ND(43) > 1.3E-02 NA NA ND(10) IND-not sub-surface styrene ND(0.23) 0.29 < 7.9E-01 ND(20) > 1.5E-02 NA NA ND(10) IND-not sub-surface 1,3-butadiene ND(0.50) 0.35 L < 1.4E+00 ND(43) > 8.1E-03 NA NA ND(10) IND-not sub-surf ace 1,3-DCB ND(0.24) 0.10 L < 2.4E+00 ND(21) > 4.8E-03 NA NA ND(10) IND-not sub-surf ace 1,4-DCB ND(0.24) 0.15 L < 1.6E+00 ND(20) > 7.5E-03 NA NA ND(10) IND-not sub-surf ace CS2 ND(0.23) 0.18 L < 1.3E+00 ND(20) > 9.3E-03 NA NA ND(10) IND-not sub-surf ace

Outdoor/Indoor 1.0? Outdoor Indoor/Sub-Slab 1.0? Outdoor/Indoor 0.33? Indoor Is VOC in GW or SG in vicinity of bldg? NO Outdoor/Indoor 0.67? Outdoor IND NO or IND Are Indoor/Sub-Slab ratios available for tracer compounds or radon? 0.33 < Outdoor/Indoor < 0.67? Indoor- Outdoor Sub-Surface Is Indoor/Sub-Slab ratio range for tracer or radon? IND Not Subsurface IND NO Outdoor/Indoor 0.33? Outdoor/Indoor 0.67? 0.33 < Outdoor/Indoor < 0.67? Indoor or Indoor Subsurface Outdoor or Outdoor Subsurface Indoor-Outdoor or Indoor-Outdoor Subsurface

Preliminary Results and Findings A protocol has been developed which allows rapid and inexpensive installation of sub-slab vapor probes with minimal disturbance to occupants. At least 3 sub-slab vapor probes samples should be installed in a typical home to calculate indoor air/subslab concentration ratios and assess associated spatial variability. Commercial buildings with larger area slabs will require more probes. Placement of sub-slab probes in the center of a slab does not consistently result in detection of higher vapor concentrations. The sub-slab sampling protocol appears to be free of systematic error

Preliminary Results and Findings An algorithm or flowchart has been developed to discern the source(s) of VOCs in indoor. The following data (and associated data is necessary) - indoor air samples (TO-15 or equivalent) - Outdoor air samples (TO-15 or equivalent) in the vicinity of indoor air sampling locations - Sub-slab air samples (on-site GC analysis, TO-15 or equivalent) - A conservative VOC compound in sub-slab air (e.g., 1,1-DCE) or use of radon to calculate indoor-air/sub-slab concentration ratios. - VOC analysis in ground-water and/or soil-gas (TO-15 preferred) in the vicinity indoor sampling locations may be necessary at some locations)

Questions?