Exempt Performance Reviews. Date: Approved June 23, 2008 Page: 1

Similar documents
Managing and Evaluating Employee Performance. January 2018

Performance Appraisal System

STAFF ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES ADMINISTRATIVE & SUPPORT STAFF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

Supervisor s Guide: Performance Evaluations

Management Performance Appraisal FY16. Demographics. General Instructions. Rating Scale. Department:

Demographics. General Instructions. Rating Scale. Department:

Leadership Performance Appraisal FY17. Demographics. General Instructions. Rating Scale. Department:

University of the District of Columbia Performance Appraisal System For Non-Faculty Employees. Supervisor Guide

Signet s FY 2016/2017 Performance Appraisal Guide. Dallas Field

ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM FY

STAFF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL RATING SCALE AND KEY DESCRIPTORS

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

FY16 Pay-for-Performance Project Update. Presented to the METRO Board People Committee by Karen Kauffman Vice President Human Resources

WINTHROP UNIVERSITY EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM POLICY AND PROCEDURE

UNCLASSIFIED EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL POLICY AND PROCEDURE

POLICY STATEMENT. Georgia Southwestern State University SUPPORT STAFF PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM

Performance Appraisal

Stephen F. Austin State University Nacogdoches, Texas. Performance Management Plan and Review

Nonfaculty Performance Evaluation (blank form for draft work)

SUCCESSION PLANNING and LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT

NO , Chapter 1 TALLAHASSEE, February 13, Human Resources

School of Veterinary Medicine Academic & University Staff Performance Evaluation Form

NON - EXEMPT EMPLOYEE

Performance Evaluation Form: Goal Setting - Performance Management - Performance Feedback

CAREER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION - Supervisor. Type of Evaluation: Probationary* (6 month evaluation)

LSUHSC-SCHOOL OF MEDICINE PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND REVIEW FORM

Knowledge frequently exceeds what is required to perform well.

STAFF PERFORMANCE RATING GUIDE

Performance Management Training. Office of Human Resources Organizational Relations, Learning & Development

Subject Matter Professional Performance Appraisal FY17. Demographics. General Instructions. Rating Scale. Department:

Performance Management and Development Scheme. For Chief Education Officers, Public Service and TAFE Administrative and Support Staff

Performance Management Faculty Briefing

RFCUNY PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROCESS

Instruction Manual. May 2017 Performance Appraisal Process Local 2324 Represented Employees

Annual Performance Evaluations Presented by: Mike Dougherty Associate Vice President for Human Resources

Southern University System Annual Employee Evaluation Form for Executive Level Staff/Directors/Department Heads

JOB DESCRIPTION TEMPLATE. Department: Department Code: Level: Job Summary:

Performance Feedback Guide

Performance and Professional Growth Systems

ADMINISTRATIVE AND PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL STAFF PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND EVALUATION FORM FY19

STATE BOARD FOR TECHNICAL AND COMPREHENSIVE EDUCATION PROCEDURE

TALENT REVIEW INSTRUCTIONS

University Human Resources Performance Development Toolkit October 2016

NON - EXEMPT EMPLOYEE SELF APPRAISAL

The following presentation will review the new performance appraisal process for staff and administrators and explain how merit pay can be achieved

Essex County College Performance Evaluation Guide Non Instructional Personnel

REPUBLIC OF UGANDA. STAFF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM FOR THE PUBLIC SERVICE Uganda Government Standing Orders Section A-e

University Human Resources Performance Development Toolkit for Staff March 2018

Nothing in this job description restricts management s right to assign or reassign duties and responsibilities to this job at any time.

University of Houston-Victoria Job Performance Appraisal

Informal observations may occur anytime, formal observations will be scheduled in advance.

JOB LEVEL GUIDE Career Track: TECHNICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT

Performance Planning and Appraisal Document

Washoe County School District. Professional Growth Systems WCSD. Education Support Personnel (ESP) Performance Standards

University of Minnesota - Academic Health Center Employee Performance Appraisal Tool

CSC MERIT POLICY COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER Revised, 6/12/14

OUTSTANDING Rating 5

Classification Grid. Compensation Philosophy Statement

UNCW Budget Analyst UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA WILMINGTON

BILOXI HOUSING AUTHORITY. Position Description. Status: Non-Exempt Pay Grade/Range:

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

COMPETENCY FRAMEWORK

POSITION DESCRIPTION. Senior Director of Innovation and Commercialization Location:

COMMUNITY ACTION PLANNING COUNCIL

CAREER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION - Employee. Type of Evaluation: Probationary* (6 month evaluation)

Employee Probationary Performance Review

Schedule 7: Employee Performance Appraisal

Staff PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FORM

Staff PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FORM

Staff PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FORM

Appraising Support Staff Performance Policy

STAFF PERFORMANCE EVALUATION. 02/28/2018 Type of Evaluation

BILOXI HOUSING AUTHORITY. Position Description. Status: Non-Exempt Pay Grade/Range:

Conducting Performance Reviews Kurtis Neal, SPHR Director of Human Resources

Staff PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FORM

Purdue Staff Evaluations

Develop and support our staff to enhance productivity: Leadership can be demonstrated at any level. Value: Competency: Fundamental Competencies

Introductions. Chris Berger. Debby LaRocco

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM

FACILITY MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN - MECHANICAL TRADES COMPETENCY PROFILE. Page 1 of 7

EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT PROFESSIONAL

DIXIE STATE UNIVERSITY 2017 Staff Employee Annual Review

UNIT TITLE: READ AND INTERPRET BASIC INSTRUCTIONS, DIRECTIONS AND/OR DIAGRAMS UNIT NUMBER: NOMINAL HOURS:

COMPETENCY PROFILE FOR THE RESEARCH, ANALYSIS AND LIBRARY SPECIALISTS GROUP

MEETS EXPECTATIONS EXAMPLE

Tennessee State University Employee Performance Evaluation

2018 HSHS Annual Performance Review Process for Leaders

STATE BOARD FOR TECHNICAL AND COMPREHENSIVE EDUCATION PROCEDURE PROCEDURE NUMBER: FACULTY PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (FPMS)

Three Rivers Community Schools Support Staff Performance Assessment

Suggested Attributes to Determine Performance Evaluation Ratings

ACP EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL 2017

Position Description Cover Sheet

Completing the Dialogue for Direction Form Review for Non-Exempt Employees

Human Resources Job Family: Human Generalist Progression

Marathon County Employee Performance Appraisal Form

Key essential skills are: Continuous Learning, Oral Communication, Problem Solving, Reading Text and Writing. Level 1. Level 2

Developing Frontline Supervisor Competencies Overview

Transcription:

Date: Approved June 23, 2008 Page: 1 Policy The performance review process is a formal communication which is an integral part of performance management and is tied to compensation. All exempt and management employees will have an annual review of their performance using the performance review system outlined in this policy. Annual compensation is tied to this review and the ratings received by employees. Procedure The performance review process is as follows: July August December May June The VP s will access the Presidents Mandate and Objectives posted on the intranet, outlining key objectives for the University, and from this develop a list of key objectives for their respective division. This is shared with each employee and will form the basis of objectives established for departments/programs and for individuals. The Manager/Supervisor and the employee meet to discuss potential objectives/targets. Once agreed upon, they are entered into the Performance Planning document. Performance criteria are also established. A copy of the document is sent to the VP. The Manager and the employee meet to do a review of progress to date and review if the targets are still appropriate.. Any changes are noted on the Checkpoint Meeting Form, with a copy to the Manager, the employee and the VP. A performance review meeting is held between the supervisor and employee to confirm the achievement and setting of targets and goals. Also at this meeting the Manager and the employee reach agreement where possible, on the recommended ratings and comments, including the Learning/Development Plan. The President and VP s will meet to review each recommendation and may require the Manager to provide additional information. Final ratings to be documented and shared with the employee after Vice-Presidential and Presidential review. A copy of the completed document is forwarded to Human Resources and placed on the employee s personnel file.

Date: Approved June 23, 2008 Page: 2 Preparation by the Supervisor The process is to assess the employee's performance, not judge his/her personality. Preparation should include: Gather all relevant documentation Refer to the job overview to review the major duties and responsibilities Review the objectives/goals which were set out at the beginning of the review period. Are they still meaningful? If the answer is no, what were the circumstances? Review critical incidents and other records of importance; consult the users of the employee's services to measure general satisfaction. These individuals could be either internal or external to the department. Consider the employee's performance for each of the applicable performance factors. Complete in draft the Performance Review document. Judge your own performance in relation to the employee - Did you provide necessary support/training? Have you provided frequent and constructive feedback? Make arrangements for the meeting to take place in an appropriate setting: private, with no interruptions. Preparation by the employee These discussions are meant as an opportunity to review, from the employee s perspective, their achievements and concerns as well as to identify where support is required from the supervisor. In order to prepare for the meeting, the employee should: Review the objectives/goals which were set out at the beginning of the review period. The objectives will most likely be contained in the previous Performance Review form. Complete in draft the Performance Review document. The worksheet is intended to prepare for the review meeting and to facilitate the discussion during the meeting. Consider your performance for each of the applicable 'performance factors' and assign your rating.

Date: Approved June 23, 2008 Page: 3 Determine what you consider to be realistic goals/objectives for the next review period Identify what you consider to be your training requirements, what support you require from the supervisor, and what career plans you may have for the future. Setting Goals Specific goals and objectives will serve as the basis for the next performance review. The supervisor and the employee should refer to this document throughout the next review period to ensure that things remain on target and to identify problematic areas. Goals should be related to the objectives of both the university and the individual job and be identified jointly. The employee should have a clear understanding of what the goals are, any deadlines which exist, and how often the goals will be reviewed during the year. Goals should be: In support of the university and departmental objectives Reasonable in number (3 to 5) Achievable An extension beyond or improvement to the normal routines of the position Flexible to be updated as circumstances and priorities change May include team goals Should also include personal development goals Learning/Development Plans Supervisors and employees should jointly identify learning/development needs which meet both the immediate and future needs of the department. Departments are encouraged to support and provide developmental opportunities for employees, whenever possible.

Date: Approved June 23, 2008 Page: 4 Rating Scale Rating Description 4 The employee demonstrates high level of performance in all areas of the job requirements and exceptional performance in one or more key areas. The employee is recognized in their unit and by the PVP Group for extraordinary contributions to Trent. Exceptional effort and outstanding initiative sets a positive example for colleagues. An employee would not receive a rating of 4 in consecutive years, under normal circumstances. 3 The employee s performance consistently and substantively meets objectives and expectations. The employee achieves critical performance targets, and meets projects and tasks within established timelines and measures (quantity, quality, within budget, client satisfaction etc.) The individual is a fully contributing member of the team. 2 The employee s performance meets most, but not all, major objectives. The employee performs most of the functions of the job; however, his/her overall performance may require development. Coaching and additional experience in the position may be needed to meet all performance expectations. The supervisor may delay a performance increase for up to 6 months pending a further performance review which shows significant improvement. 1 The employee s performance falls below minimum expectations. Significant improvements must be made or reassignment or termination will be considered. The supervisor who has an employee whose performance falls within this category should work with their Vice President and Human Resources.

Date: Approved June 23, 2008 Page: 5 Exempt System Performance Measures Consider to what degree individuals demonstrate desirable characteristics in following performance competency areas: Core Capabilities - the job description outlines the items referred to as Core Capabilities. Included in this topic are the identified responsibilities of the job tasks to be performed and the knowledge required to perform the activities. Customer Service Orientation - follows through on commitments to resolve client issues and needs in a timely manner, takes initiative to uncover underlying client issues and needs, identifies and communicates with those who can resolve customer issues in an effective and timely manner, communicates client needs and trends to supervisor, anticipates and responds in a positive manner to the needs of internal and external clients. Quality and Quantity of Work - the volume of acceptable work produced in a timely and consistent manner, the accuracy and thoroughness of work completed and the ability to meet deadlines. Decision Making and Judgment - analyzes and solves problems, accountable and responsible for decisions taken, effective decision making, involves and consults others as required, flexible and ensures follow-up. Organizational Ability - plans out work and organizes its completion, ability to cope with a variety of activities and distractions, ability to establish priorities and deal with priority items first, ability to provide organized support to the department in dealing with meetings, projects reports, etc. with limited supervision. Communication - informs others of services and roles, effectiveness of staff and client messaging, listening ability, written and verbal performance, presentation and facilitation skills as required. Professional Development - remains current in work function, remains current in technology that can assist in delivering services to the department. Special Assignments - makes supervisor aware of their interests for university committees and projects and proactively makes themselves available to participate as appropriate.

Date: Approved June 23, 2008 Page: 6 Employee Name Employee Performance Planning and Review Summary Position Appraisal Period Covered: From: Department To: Criteria for Evaluation Rating Comments/Rationale Core Capabilities (List by duties) Customer Service Orientation Quality and Quantity of Work Decision Making and Judgment Organizational Ability Communication Professional Development Special Assignments

Date: Approved June 23, 2008 Page: 7 Results from Previous Years Goals Goals 1. Results 2. 3. 4. 5. Rating based on results of goals: Planning New Goals 1. Performance Criteria 2. 3. 4. 5.

Date: Approved June 23, 2008 Page: 8 Employee s Strengths/ Accomplishments Areas that Require Improvement Learning/ Development Plan

Date: Approved June 23, 2008 Page: 9 Overall Rating and Comments: Employee Comments: I have read and discussed this appraisal with my supervisor. Signature of Employee Date Signature of Supervisor Date Signature of Vice President Date