USDA NRCS GRP WHIP CSP

Similar documents
Natural Resources Conservation Service

FARM BILL 2002 Colorado Conservation Provisions

Mississippi River Basin Healthy Watershed Initiative

The 2014 Farm Bill. Texas Watershed Coordinators Roundtable Waco, Texas July 31, 2014

NRCS Water Quality Practices

National Soil Health Initiative

Agroforestry Treasures in the USDA Farm Bill

NRCS Conservation Programs Update

Focus on Financial Resources. Kristin Lambert, WI DNR Chris Miller, NRCS

Gulf Hypoxia and the Mississippi River Basin Healthy Watershed Initiative


NRCS Progress in the Great Lakes Basin (Past, Present and Future)

Environmental Issues: Opportunities and Challenges for Grazing Dairies. By Kevin Ogles Grazing Specialist NRCS ENTSC Greensboro, NC

COST SHARE AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS FOR IMPLEMENTING BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES TO IMPROVE WATER QUALITY

Seasonal High Tunnels. Conservation Benefits Interim Practice Standard Financial Assistance Guidance

Conservation Practices. Conservation Choices. These five icons will show the benefits each practice offers... 6/4/2014

Mississippi River Basin Healthy Watersheds Initiative

Wetland Functional Assessment- Agricultural Lands. Kim Farrell Natural Resources Conservation Service U.S. Department of Agriculture October 13, 2015

Agricultural NPS Measures. Kevin Wagner Aaron Wendt

Efficiency and Conservation in Agricultural Water Use

Locally Led Conservation & The Local Work Group. Mark Habiger NRCS

CONSERVATION AND WILDLIFE PROGRAMS

Planning for Growth and Open Space Conservation

N R C S. Farm Bill Projects on Vermont Vegetable and Berry Farms. Natural Resources Conservation Service

Dust Bowl and USDA - NRCS. Kim Wright USDA-NRCS Program Liaison Bryan, Texas

Role of Woody Species in (Riparian) Buffer Plantings

USDA and other Government Agency efforts to Enhance Soil and Water Conservation

Drainage Water Management: Optimizing nutrient use while managing risk. Presented by: Rob Sampson NRCS National Water Management Engineer

Water Talk Series

Bastrop & Caldwell County Water Resources

Objectives ALPHABET SOUP A GUIDE TO NRCS PROGRAMS. General Agency Overview Programs & Practices Available Success Stories Questions??

A Brief Overview of U.S. Agricultural Conservation Policy

CONSERVATION RESERVE ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM (CREP) SUMMARY OF THE WISCONSIN S PROJECT

Analysis of Effectiveness of Ohio NRCS Practice Standards in Addressing Five Leading Causes of Water Quality Impairment

DOUGLAS SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT PLAN OF WORK JANUARY 1, 2012 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2012

Agriculture & Water Quality Shifting Perceptions & Shifting Policies

2014 Farm Bill FACT SHEET. The Noninsured Crop Disaster Assistance Program for 2015 and Subsequent Years

Natural Resources Conservation Service

DISASTER ASSISTANCE. Emergency Assistance for Livestock, Honeybees and Farm-Raised Fish Program (ELAP) - Livestock Assistance LIVESTOCK DEATH LOSSES

Conservation Practices for Landlords There is growing concern over the possible

USDA Farm Bill Programs

NRCS Standards and Criteria for Dead Animal Composting

The USDA. Farm Bill:

DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM

ANNUAL PLAN MURRAY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT. Slayton, MN. January 1, December 31, 2018

Hungry Creek Watershed Road Maintenance and Stony Quarry Development

Woodland Planning for Success

USDA-NRCS Programs and Interpretation of Haney Soil Health Test Results

Anyone can come in for technical assistance. NRCS and its partners use the CTA program to provide technical assistance to: farmers, ranchers, local

Conservation Corner. Announcements. New Website

Soil Health: Resource Concerns and Conservation Planning. David A. Lamm National Soil Health Team Leader Greensboro, NC

Lambson Draw On/Off Allotment Livestock Conversion Decision Notice

United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Highlights of various programs. Wetlands Reserve program (WRP)

orking Trees for Water Quality

2014 Farm Bill. FACT SHEET March Noninsured Crop Disaster Assistance Program for 2015 and Subsequent Years

January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017

Moonlight Aquatic Organism Passage Project

Voluntary Conservation Works, and Further Water Quality Gains Can Be Achieved

LYLE FREES Water Quality Specialist, NRCS Phone:

Tillage Management and Soil Organic Matter

National Best Management Practices Monitoring Summary Report

National Association of State Foresters (NASF) 2014 Farm Bill Crosswalk 1

PROJECT INFORMATION Manchester Ranger District Apple Tree Release and Maintenance Project

Proposed Action. for the. North 40 Scrub Management Project

Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program Program Update

Conservation Practices for Water Quality: Sediment & Nutrient Control. Trap Sediments/Trap Nutrients on the Field. Improve Soil Health.

Government Conservation Programs

ANALYSIS OF CCRP S RECORD BREAKING ENROLLMENT NSAC SPECIAL REPORTS

Livestock Watering Systems. Mark Green Lead Resource Conservationist USDA-NRCS Springfield, MO

Local Government Commission California Adaptation Forum

TOTAL IMPACT REGIONAL CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM. RCPP s

Livestock Watering Systems

ART & SCIENCE OF GRAZING MANAGEMENT Science. Art. This is NOT the Goal! Why Management-intensive Grazing (MiG)?

Agricultural NPS Measures. Kevin Wagner Aaron Wendt

Grundy County Conservation Connection

Northeastern Forest and Conservation Nursery Association

The Fight against Soil Erosion in Minnesota-the Conservation Reserve Program at the Front Line

Current Conservation Reserve Program (CRP)

Texas, Forest Inventory & Analysis Factsheet. James W. Bentley. Forested Area. Introduction. Inventory Volume

Corn Objective Yield Survey Data,

Mob Grazing vs. Tight Grazing vs. Low Utilization

Kittitas County Voluntary Stewardship Plan

DECISION MEMO MANHATTAN FUELS REDUCTION PROJECT U.S. FOREST SERVICE CANYON LAKES RANGER DISTRICT LARIMER COUNTY, CO

The 2014 farm bill is now

Rice SWCD 2018 Annual Plan of Work

United States and Canadian Cattle and Sheep

Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program

BUDGET BASICS TRAINING TOPIC: DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS. Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP)

CARBON FARMING IN MARIN

BANDIT TIMBER SALE Highlights Iron River Ranger District OTTAWA NATIONAL FOREST The Bandit Timber Sale Area is along the south side of FR 3110, 2.1 mi

Recommendations to Enhance Wildlife Benefits of the 2018 Farm Bill

United States Department of Agriculture. Forest Service. Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest. September 2014

Soybean Objective Yield Survey Data,

2014 Farm Bill Highlights for Wyoming Livestock Operators. Nicole Ballenger John Hewlett Agricultural and Applied Economics and UW Extension

Conservation Planning on Organic* Farms *Certified Organic, Transitioning-to-Organic, & Exempt from Certification

GLASI GLASI. Priority Subwatershed Project. Great Lakes Agricultural Stewardship Initiative

Iowa Beef Producer Profile: A 2014 Survey of Iowa Cow-Calf Producers

United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service

On/Off periods Improvements Grazing System. 2 fence segments. 1 water development, 2 cattle guards

Transcription:

USDA NRCS GRP WHIP CSP

Environmental Qualities Incentives Program The Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) is a voluntary conservation program. It supports production agriculture and environmental quality as compatible goals. Through EQIP, farmers may receive financial and technical help install conservation practices on agricultural land to solve a resource concern.

FY 13 EQIP in Minnesota General MN EQIP (20,000,000.00) MN Cropland MN Livestock Ag Waste MN Livestock Grazing/Pasture/Hayland MN Wildlife MN Tribal MN Socially Disadvantaged MN Beginning Farmer Rancher MN Drainage Water Management ($95,000) MN Forestry Initiative ($991,829.00) MN Soil Health Initiative ($1,001,964.00) MN Cover Crop/Preventative Planting ($2,236,000.00) Certified Organic ($112,000) Organic Transition ($10,460.00) On farm Energy ($61,242.00)

FY 13 EQIP in Minnesota Driftless Area Initiative($956,861.00) Ag Certainty ($599,914.00) Elm Creek Middle Sauk River Whiskey Creek Whitewater River Mississippi River Basin Initiative ($1,593,625.00) Watson Creek Rush Pine Creek Root River Green Valley/Austin Watershed Redwood County Little Cottonwood Grand Pearl National Water Quality Initiative ($257,609.00) Gilchrist Lake Big Twin Lake Sevenmile Creek

Conservation Stewardship Program (CStP) CSP will help owners and operators of agricultural lands maintain conservation stewardship and implement and maintain additional needed conservation practices. The conservation benefits gained will keep farms and ranches more sustainable and profitable and increase the benefits provided to all Americans through improved natural resources.

Conservation Stewardship Program (CStP) 2010 2012 had 3,183 active contracts and provided $55.5 million in annual payments. CSP 2013 signup enrolled an additional 552 contracts with $10.0 million obligated. Totals: 3,735 contracts for $65.6 million in annual payments.

Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) Administered through Farm Service Agency (FSA) General CRP Continuous CRP (CCRP) State Acres For Wildlife Enhancement (SAFE) Riparian Buffers Contour Buffer Strips Grassed Waterways Windbreaks/Shelterbelts Conservation Cover Tree and Shrub Establishment Rare and Declining Habitat

Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) Administered through Farm Service Agency (FSA) Number of SU45 Offers: 980 Number of existing General Contracts: 21,104 Number of existing CCRP Contracts: 37,713

Other Conservation Programs Grassland Reserve Program (GRP) FY 2013, NRCS and FSA completed acquisition of three perpetual GRP easements all located in Fillmore County. Wetland Reserve Program (WRP) During fiscal year 2013, 46 prior year funded WRP easements were finalized on a total of 4800 acres. Restoration was completed on previously closed WRP easements on 57 projects covering 7750 acres. In 2013, $3 million was obligated with 30 participants on over 3,000 acres. The majority of these obligations included RIM funding. Wildlife Habitat Incentives Program (WHIP) Conservation Technical Assistance (CTA)

Common Conservation Practices Brush Management Conservation Cover Conservation Crop Rotation Cover Crops Residue Management (No Till) Fence Field Borders Photo courtesy of River Country RC&D Photo courtesy of River Country RC&D *Not a complete list of all eligible practices

Common Conservation Practices (Continued) Grassed Waterways Nutrient Management Organic Transition Plans Pest Management Pipelines Prescribed Grazing Photo courtesy of River Country RC&D

Common Conservation Practices (continued) Seasonal High Tunnel System for Crops Stream Crossings and Aquatic Organism Passage Tree and Shrub Establishment Underground Outlet Waste Storage Facility Well for Grazing Well Decommissioning Windbreaks

Conservation Stewardship CStP Enhancements Program (Often Overlooked) Air, Animal, Energy, Plants, Soil Erosion, Soil Quality, Water Quality, and More

Conservation Stewardship Program Enhancements Extending buffers along streams Locally grown and marketed farm products Harvest hay that allows wildlife to escape Resource Conserving Crop Rotation Windbreak Renovation Habitat development for beneficial insects Continuous no till organic systems

Conservation Stewardship Program Enhancements Continuous cover crops Use of cover crop mixes Use deep rooted crops to break up compaction Use of non chemical methods to kill cover crops Transition to organic cropping systems IPM Grazing management for wildlife Retrofitting watering facilities for wildlife escape

Conservation Stewardship Program Enhancements Managing calving to coincide with forage availability Monitor key grazing areas for improved management Rotation of supplemental feeding areas Non chemical pest control for livestock Transition to organic grazing systems Composting on farm organic waste Protection of sensitive areas on winter grazing land Managing livestock access to water bodies/courses

NRCS Soil Health Initiative United States Department of Agriculture is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Food for thought World population is estimated to reach 9.1 billion by 2050. To sustain this level of growth, we will need to produce as much food in the next 40 years as we have in the past 500 years.

Food for thought Globally, desertification and farmland conversion is accelerating. In the U.S. alone, between 1982 2007, 14 million acres of prime farmland was lost to development. Between 1982 and 2010, MN lost an estimated 800,000 acres of farmland From UW Extension: Center for and Use Education Report: Losing Ground: Tracking the rate of Farmland Loss in Wisconsin Counties 1992 to 23010:

Food for thought Need to optimize inputs Producers are searching for ways to optimize inputs and maximize profits.

Food for thought Agriculture is facing a huge loss of nonrenewable resources we can t wait till 2050 to start. The clock s ticking. We re already at the tipping point. We must start planning now. Paul Farrell, MarketWatch

Everything.

Why Soil Health? There is a growing market need There is producer interest Takes advantage of our purpose (Conservation) Provides the best return on our conservation investment

Soil Health is a Systemic Resource Treatment (Win, Win, Win) By focusing on soil health, we can have a positive impact on every major resource concern. Increase efficiencies and farm profitability. Maintain or even increase ag productivity.

Benefits of healthy soils Improve water quality Regulate water and reduce flooding Cycle organic wastes and detoxify noxious chemicals

Soil Health Benefits (continued) Increase soil carbon and remove CO 2 Save energy (fuel and plant nutrients) Save water and increase drought tolerance

Soil Health Benefits (continued) Improve income sustainability Improve plant health; and Increase nutrientrich food production

Soil Health Benefits (continued) Improve wildlife value (on and off site) Reduce disease and pest problems

Watershed Level Benefits Reductions in sediment and nutrient delivery to surface waters Increased infiltration and water holding capacity.

Soil Health Planning Principles 1. Manage More by Disturbing Soil Less 2. Use Plant Diversity to Increase Diversity in the Soil 3. Grow Living Roots Throughout the Year 4. Keep the Soil Covered as Much as Possible

Soil Health Management Systems (SHMSs) SHMSs are a series of conservation and agronomic practices that when combined together lead to maintaining or increased soil health and productivity. Must be implemented as a system (Synergy) Based on the 4 soil health planning principles Not all practices are applicable to all crops or enterprises. Some systems may benefit from additional practices while other systems may only need one practice. Similar to an RMS plans and CORE 4 planning but the underlying goal/resource is soil health.

Soil Health Management System Conservation Practices Mandatory 328 Conservation Cropping Rotation 329 No till or Strip till 340 Cover Crops 590 Nutrient Management 595 Pest Management (Integrated) 528 Prescribed Grazing As Applicable 512 Forage and Biomass Planting Conservation Buffers, Filter Strips, Contour Farming, Contour Strip Cropping, and more Recommended Precision Application of Nutrients Controlled Traffic no Tillage Strip Cropping More Diverse Crop Rotation Much More

The Ultimate Goal Increase the number of producers operating with Soil Health Management Systems (SHMSs).

Manage More by Disturbing the Soil Less Same Map Unit Different Management 62.8% loss of SOM after 17 yr intensive tillage 20 cm layer Forest SOM = 4.3 % CT 17 yr Soybean monoculture SOM = 1.6 %

Integrated communications support

Banner stands, exhibits

NRCS campaign features soil health farmers making the case for soil health

Video Products

Web Resources http://soils.usda.gov/sqi/publications/publications.html http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/main/national/soils /health/

New Soil Test Kits http://soils.usda.gov/sqi/assessment/educators.html

Overall Objective Increasing our Soil Health resources cost effectively, while increasing the productivity of our State s working lands. Getting More Common Sense Conservation on the Land

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination against its customers. If you believe you experienced discrimination when obtaining services from USDA, participating in a USDA program, or participating in a program that receives financial assistance from USDA, you may file a complaint with USDA. Information about how to file a discrimination complaint is available from the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights. USDA prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex (including gender identity and expression), marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, political beliefs, genetic information, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) To file a complaint of discrimination, complete, sign, and mail a program discrimination complaint form, available at any USDA office location or online at www.ascr.usda.gov, or write to: USDA Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights 1400 Independence Avenue, SW. Washington, DC 20250-9410 Or call toll free at (866) 632-9992 (voice) to obtain additional information, the appropriate office or to request documents. Individuals who are deaf, hard of hearing, or have speech disabilities may contact USDA through the Federal Relay service at (800) 877-8339 or (800) 845-6136 (in Spanish). USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). United States Department of Agriculture is an equal opportunity provider and employer.