Special Research Report #215: Effects of Pesticide Mixtures in Controlling Arthropod Pests of Greenhouses

Similar documents
American Floral Endowment Report #215 2

Efficacy of Pesticide Mixtures Against the Western Flower Thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) Under Laboratory and Greenhouse Conditions

Pesticide Applicator Recertification Credit

AMY LYNN WILLMOTT. B.S., Rutgers University, 2008 A THESIS. submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF SCIENCE

Biological Control in Ornamental Propagation

Integrated. Pest. Dr Paul Horne IPM Technologies Pty Ltd. Management IPM

Kansas State University Department of Entomology Newsletter

Q-Biotype Whitefly: Strategies for Prevention & Management. OFA Short Course July 8 11, 2006

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Overture (Pyridalyl) Crop Safety

Summary of Cotton Insecticide Options for Florida 1

Combating insecticide resistance in major UK pests: modelling section

Adaptive Trait Evolution: Pesticide Resistance

Ecology and Management of Scirtothrips dorsalis

Integrated Pest Management Program Department of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture UConn Extension

Special Research Report #531 Production Technology Growth of Petunia as Affected by Substrate Moisture Content and Fertilizer Rate

Lewis Mite, Thrips and Lygus Research Update

Avocado Thrips Subproject 3: Pesticide Screening, Sabadilla Resistance, Goetheana and Lacewing Studies

THE (COSHH) CONTROL OF SUBSTANCES HAZARDOUS TO HEALTH REGULATIONS MAY APPLY TO THE USE OF THIS PRODUCT AT WORK.

START STRONG // SAFARI INSECTICIDE

Management of Insect and Mite Resistance in Ornamental Crops 1

Invasion and Response: Impacts of Bemisia on Worldwide Agriculture.

Special Research Report #531 Production Technology Growth of Petunia as Affected by Substrate Moisture Content and Fertilizer Rate

Update on Blueberry Insect Pest Management. Pest Management

COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF DIFFERENT INSECTICIDES AGAINST SUCKING PESTS OF COTTON

Minimizing the Impact of Pesticides on Pollinators. Charlotte Glen Horticulture Agent NC Cooperative Extension, Chatham County Center

Lloyd Traven, M.Sc. Peace Tree. We ALL say we want it-- BUT.. Will THEY Buy it?

A Monthly Report on Pesticides and Related Environmental Issues. June 2002 Issue No Natural Enemies

A guide to Soybean Aphids in South Dakota

Vegetables Commercial Greenhouse Tomatoes

Kansas State University Extension Entomology Newsletter

EPA Docket ID: EPA-HQ-OPP Date: August 22, 2018

2017 Statewide IPM Report July 13, 2018 Managing Thrips in Commercial Eggplant Production Systems via Implementation of Macaranga Border Crops

Using biopesticides and reduced-risk pesticides for insect control in high tunnel vegetable production

Growing. Frequently asked questions & answers. 1. What is SIVANTO prime? 2. What is the mode of action of SIVANTO prime?

Kansas State University Department of Entomology Newsletter

CHRISTMAS TREE PRODUCTION

Complex Example. Page 1 of 8

Bagworms ---- Current Status, and What to Do. Bagworms ---- Current Status, and What to Do Insect Diagnostic Laboratory Report

CONTROL OF! GREENHOUSE WHITEFLY PUBLICATION C212 P1469. (1974 print) c.2. agriculture. Canada

EVALUATION OF POTATO INSECT PEST MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS

Insecticide Usage on Desert Lettuce,

ECO 2 FUME AS A QUARANTINE FUMIGANT FOR EXPORT PAPRICA, CHERRY TOMATO AND STRAWBERRY

THE (COSHH) CONTROL OF SUBSTANCES HAZARDOUS TO HEALTH REGULATIONS MAY APPLY TO THE USE OF THIS PRODUCT AT WORK UK ONLY

Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Project Sheet

IPM Strategies and Techniques

Development of methods for maintenance of lettuce-infecting tospoviruses, effective germplasm screening, and identification of sources of resistance

Starting a Biocontrol Program for Cut Gerbera

IMP Scouting and Monitoring for Pests in Commercial Greenhouses

Cucumbers (Pickles and Slicers) IPM Element Revised March, 2012

Good Bug, Bad Bug ID

School Landscape IPM: Insect Pests. Mark H. Shour Extension Entomology Iowa State University

Control of insect and mite pests in grains insecticide resistance and IPM. Paul Umina Svetlana Micic Laura Fagan

Insect Losses and Management on Desert Lettuce:

Kansas State University Extension Entomology Newsletter

Tomato Insects to be Looking For

Turf Insect Management. Diane Alston Utah State University Utah Pest Control & Lawn Care Assoc. Annual Convention February 10, 2006

Browned Elm Trees : August 29, 2003 No. 22

Bee Informed Pesticides, Bees and BCAs Compatibility

The Buzz in Pollinators Michael Embrey Tuckahoe Apiaries

Natural Enemies (Farmers' Friends) Introduction

Lorraine P. Berk et t. IPM Spec ialist Universit y of Verm ont

Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Project Sheet

Tobacco Mosaic Virus - Joanne Lutz, GGSPro Technical Support-updated

ONLINE COURSE PEST AND DISEASE MANAGEMENT

Overview of Pesticides for Master Gardeners

Efficiency of north-western Italian thrips populations in transmitting tospoviruses

limited, but still important where those uses are necessary and especially when other alternatives have already been used (e.g.

Arizona Vegetable IPM Team

Pesticides and Bees. Bee Behavior. Table 1. Factors that disrupt honey bee activity and may be responsible for declines.

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF FRANKLINIELLA OCCIDENTALIS IN PREVENTION OF THE SPREAD OF TOMATO SPOTTED WILT VIRUS DIANNA L.

THRIPS CONTROL ON DRY BULB ONIONS

POTENTIAL PHYTOTOXICITY OF RIMON ON LEAFY GREENS

Colony Collapse Disorder: Why is it so difficult to study?

Laura Ingwell Wednesday, September 5, 2018

Kansas Insect Newsletter

FRESH VEGETABLE GROWERS OF ONTARIO

Evaluation of Systemic Chemicals for Avocado Thrips and Avocado Lace Bug Management

BioCeres WP AzaGuard. IR-4 Bio-Pesticide Workshop, Presented by: Manuel Campos

All About Lygus Management in Strawberry Production

SELECTIVE PESTICIDES AND BIOLOGICAL CONTROL IN WALNUT PEST MANAGEMENT

Kansas State University Department of Entomology Newsletter

Survey of Pests and Beneficial Insects in Conventional and Transgenic Cotton

The Benefits of Insecticide Use: Spinach

Strawberry IPM Season Review Thursday 25th June Elizabeth Town Café 10:00 am till 2 pm

Transform P INSECTICIDE IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR USE ONLY AS AN AGRICULTURAL INSECTICIDE. Maximum Individual Dose

Title: Integrated control of viburnum leaf beetle with minimally toxic methods

Diamondback moth resistance to insecticides in Guangdong Province

Neonicotinoid seed treatments (NSTs) and potential impacts on pollinators

Grower Summary PO 003. Development of safe and effective programmes for the early control of tobacco whitefly on poinsettia crops.

Minimizing the Impact of Pesticides on Pollinators. Charlotte Glen Horticulture Agent NC Cooperative Extension, Chatham County Center

Biological Control of Key Pests of Greenhouse and Nursery Production

Neonicotinoids. Neonicotinoid Profile. Safety. Neonicotinoids and Bees

FIRST AID. If in eyes:

FIRST AID. If in eyes:

Kansas State University Department of Entomology Newsletter

The IR-4 Project 50 Years of Supporting Pest Control Products for Specialty Crops & Minor Uses

PEAnut InSECt COntROl

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Kontos (Spirotetramat) Crop Safety

Biological control with IBCA s in a developing market. Graeme Gowling, ABIM October 2014

Development of Behaviorally Based Monitoring Tools and Management Strategies for the Brown Marmorated Stink Bug

Transcription:

Special Research Report #215: Effects of Pesticide Mixtures in Controlling Arthropod Pests of Greenhouses A. L. Willmott, graduate student; R. A. Cloyd, Professor and Extension Specialist; K. Y. Zhu, Professor, Department of Entomology Kansas State University, 123 Waters Hall, Manhattan, KS 66506 BACKGROUND Western flower thrips (Frankliniella occidentalis) is the most destructive insect pest of greenhouse-grown horticulture crops. They cause direct and indirect damage to plants. Direct damage is associated with western flower thrips feeding on plant cells, which results in the deformation of leaves and flowers, making the flowers unmarketable. Indirect damage is caused when adults transmit tospoviruses e.g., the impatiens necrotic spot virus (INSV). Therefore, to mitigate populations of western flower thrips, greenhouse producers rely on insecticide applications. Often, however, multiple insect and/or mite pest species including thrips, mealy bugs, mites, aphids, whiteflies and fungus gnats are present simultaneously during a single cropping cycle. Consequently, greenhouse producers apply pesticides (insecticides and miticides) as mixtures, which may broaden the spectrum of pest activity. This results in the mitigation of populations of multiple insect and/or mite pests that greenhouse producers may encounter simultaneously. There is, however, little quantitative research on the impact of pesticide mixtures in regulating populations of western flower thrips. Therefore, the objectives of our study were three-fold: (1) to examine compatibility and phytotoxicity of the most commonly used two-way pesticide mixtures against the western flower thrips, (2) to determine synergistic (enhanced) or antagonistic (negative) effects of the two-way mixtures under laboratory conditions, and (3) to assess the efficacy of currently used two-way and three-way pesticide mixtures against the western flower thrips under greenhouse conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS 1. Pesticide Compatibility and Plant Phytotoxicity Jar tests were performed to determine the visual compatibility of the designated pesticide mixtures. The mixtures were applied to determine any phytotoxicity (plant injury) to a variety of horticultural plants including: chrysanthemum, petunia, marigold, impatiens, begonia and coleus. 1

2. Formulated Pesticide Bioassays Bean-dip laboratory bioassays were conducted to determine the lethal dose (LC 50 ) values for the formulated pesticides containing abamectin (Avid), acephate (Orthene), azadirachtin (Ornazin), bifenazate (Floramite), bifenthrin (Talstar), fenpropathrin (Tame), imidacloprid (Marathon), novaluron (Pedestal), pymetrozine (Endeavor) and spinosad (Conserve). The mortality of western flower thrips adults was assessed after 24-hours. 3. Formulated Pesticide Mixture Bioassays Bean-dip laboratory bioassays (similar to those described above in #2) were used to determine LC 50 values for each formulated two-way pesticide mixture. The rate of each pesticide used in the mixture was based on the highest recommended labeled rates for western flower thrips, and for products not registered for western flower thrips; the highest recommended labeled rate was used. Concentrations of both pesticides were either increased or decreased proportionally to calculate an LC 50 value for each mixture. The mortality of western flower thrips adults was assessed after 24-hours. 4. Greenhouse Experiments Three experiments were conducted in greenhouses at Kansas State University to evaluate the efficacy of the formulated pesticides as well as two- and three-way pesticide mixtures. Yellow cut transvaal daisy (Gerbera jamesonii) flowers were used in the three experiments. Individual flowers were processed and placed into 22-mm glass vials containing tap water (Figure 1). After 2 days, approximately 20 western flower thrips adults obtained from our laboratory-reared colonies were aspirated into vials, added to each flower, and allowed to establish for 2 days before application (spray) of the pesticide treatments. Efficacy of each pesticide and pesticide mixture was based on percent mortality of western flower thrips adults. Figure 1. Experimental design for the greenhouse experiments showing the transvaal daisy (Gerbera jamesonii) flowers that were inoculated with western flower thrips (Frankliniella occidentalis) adults. 2

RESULTS 1. Pesticide Compatibility and Plant Phytotoxicity Each of the two-way pesticide mixtures displayed no visible signs of incompatibility and none of the two-way pesticide mixtures was phytotoxic to any of the floricultural plants tested. 2. Formulated Pesticide Bioassays Spinosad (Conserve) had the lowest LC 50 value. This indicated that it was the most toxic to the population of western flower thrips followed by abamectin (Avid), acephate (Orthene), and bifenthrin (Talstar). 3. Formulated Pesticide Mixture Bioassays Those pesticide mixtures containing spinosad (Conserve) had the lowest LC 50 values indicating the highest toxicity to adult western flower thrips followed by most of the pesticide mixtures containing abamectin (Avid). 4. Greenhouse Experiments The results associated with the greenhouse experiments are presented in Figures 2 to 4. For experiment one, most of the pesticide mixtures provided approximately 80 percent mortality of western flower thrips (Figure 1). In experiment two, most of individual treatments and pesticide mixtures resulted in nearly 100 percent mortality of western flower thrips; whereas, the other pesticides resulted in minimal mortality of western flower thrips (Figure 2). For experiment three, most of the individual pesticide treatments and pesticide mixtures resulted in 80 percent western flower thrips mortality; however, a number of pesticide treatments resulted in 15 percent western flower thrips mortality (Figure 3). 3

Figure 2. Percent mortality of western flower thrips (WFT) associated with six formulated pesticides and four pesticide mixtures under greenhouse conditions. Treatment designations: AB=abamectin (Avid); AZ(A)=azadirachtin(Azatin); AZ(O)=azadirachtin(Ornazin); B=bifenthrin (Talstar); P=pymetrozine (Endeavor); S=spinosad (Spinosad); and W=water. Bars with the same letter are not significantly different from each other. Vertical bars indicated the standard error of the mean. Figure 3. Percent mortality of western flower thrips (WFT) associated with six formulated pesticides and five pesticide mixtures under greenhouse conditions. Treatment designations: P=pymetrozine (Endeavor); B=bifenazate (Floramite); S=spinosad (Conserve); N=novaluron (Pedestal); A=acephate (Acephate); F=fenpropathrin (Tame); and W=water. Bars with the same letter are not significantly different from each other. Vertical bars indicated the standard error of the mean. 4

Figure 4. Percent mortality of western flower thrips (WFT) associated with six formulated pesticides and five pesticide mixtures under greenhouse conditions. Treatment designations: AB=abamectin (Avid); AZ=azadirachtin(Azatin); S=spinosad (Conserve); B=bifenazate (Floramite); T=tolfenpyrad (Hachi-Hachi); I=imidacloprid (Marathon); A=acephate (Orthene); F=fenpropathrin (Tame); and W=water. Bars with the same letter are not significantly different from each other. Vertical bars indicated the standard error of the mean. CONCLUSIONS None of the two-way pesticide mixtures currently being used in greenhouses were phytotoxic to the floricultural plants. In addition, most of the two-way pesticide mixtures provided 80 percent mortality of western flower thrips under greenhouse conditions. Greenhouse producers may use many of the pesticide mixtures evaluated in our study when attempting to mitigate insect and/or mite pest populations simultaneously with no detrimental effects against western flower thrips. INDUSTRY IMPACT This research will assist greenhouse producers who plan to use pesticide mixtures against western flower thrips populations. The studies provide greenhouse producers information to understand which pesticide mixtures will or will not be effective against populations of western flower thrips. The research aims to prevent the use of ineffective mixtures, which result in financial losses and crop damage. Using only effective mixtures saves time, money and may enable greenhouse producers to use fewer mixture applications. For Detailed Information Associated With This Study Refer To The Following Publication: Willmott, A. L., R. A. Cloyd, and K. Y. Zhu. 2013. Efficacy of pesticide mixtures against the western flower thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) under laboratory and greenhouse conditions. Journal of Economic Entomology 106(1): 247-256. March, 2013 Copyright American Floral Endowment All Rights Reserved For additional information, contact rcloyd@ksu.edu 5

The information contained in this report may not be reproduced without the written consent of the American Floral Endowment. For more information, contact Debi Aker at (703) 838-5211. American Floral Endowment 703.838.5211 afe@endowment.org www.endowment.org 6