A New 4-Step Process for Lowering the Cost and Reducing the Carbon Footprint of Thermoformed Packaging

Similar documents
Sustainable Development & Our approach to Packaging for a Sustainable Future. Gail Tavill

Sustainable Packaging: Keys to Source Reduction and Successful Recovery

Compostability Standards & Testing

PACKAGING ASSESSMENT CASE STUDIES. Haigh s Chocolates. A packaging assessment case study

REVIEW OF LIFECYCLE INVENTORY STUDY FOR HALF-GALLON MILK CONTAINERS

Bill Guido Category Merchant Packaging & Supplies

LCA Informing Packaging Design a case study of COMPASS

Materials Management for a Sustainable Future Georgia Recycling Coalition 22 nd Annual Conference & Trade Show

A matter of substance.

PET Thermoform Recycling:

Abbott Sustainable Packaging Program. Curt Michols Sr. Principal Specialist Abbott Laboratories Global Environment, Health, Safety & Energy

A Comparison of Clamshell Food Packaging Made from Ingeo and r-pet. Life Cycle Analysis performed by the IFEU Institute in Heidelberg, Germany

MEDICAL PACKAGING SPECIALISTS

Did you know...? Definitions. Biodegradable vs. Compostable Plastics

Chilled ready meal potato mash

Ashwin Dhurvas Packaging Manager IoPP Member

Shelf Ready Packaging

2008 Italian Technology Award Paper Competition

BASF Biodegradables. Bioplastics 101. North America Business Manager - Bioplastics

Environmental Technical Brief: HDPE

Definitions. Biodegradable vs. Compostable Plastics

ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS OF CHEP USA PALLET POOLING

PET Thermoforms excerpt from The APR Design TM Guide for Plastics Recyclability

A framework for. greater consistency in household recycling in England

Packaging Savings Go Beyond Recycling

Sustainable Packaging

Topics in Sustainable Packaging. Anne Johnson PMMI PMC Meeting St. Petersburg, FL, Feb 28, 2007

Costs and benefits of using wood-based materials in packaging. Prof Ali Harlin, PhD Sara Paunonen VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland

EPEAT CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT PROTOCOLS 4.8 Packaging

Minority Certification

SPK Packaging Co.,Ltd

Classic Packaging Industries

ECONOMICAL RENEWABLE VERSATILE RECYCLABLE SUSTAINABLE. Paperboard Packaging. Good for your bottom line... and OUR PLANET

Calculating the Environmental Savings from Returnable Packaging

EPEAT CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT PROTOCOLS 4.8 Packaging

3M s Packaging Environmental Sustainability Initiative

The World s Leading Brands use Kortec

PROJECT SCOPE & STAKEHOLDER INVITATION FOR PARTICIPATION: New Green Seal Environmental Standard for Plastic Resin Film Bags (GS-45)

Sustainable Procurement Guidelines

A Chain Reaction: Using Packaging Processes to Advance Supply Chain Performance. Tom Blanck, CSCP Chainalytics 10/22/2012

Signatory Name: Ward McKenzie Pty Ltd

Contents. Overview. Manufacturing. Contract Packaging. Point of Purchase Displays. Service. Logistics. Locations

Huhtamaki Corporate Responsibility

Sustainable Materials Management Bob Gedert, NRC President. Together, We Are Recycling!

Top 10 Packaging Challenges For Recycling in a MRF REVISITED. 8 th Canadian Waste Resource Symposium April 28th, 2016

2/15/2016 PAPERFOAM: REDUCING YOUR CARBON FOOTPRINT FOR PACKAGING

Packaging Effects on Climate Change: Flexibles

Remember that plastic bottle you threw?

Basic Concept/Targets and Results

THE CUBE. New Ideas Come Up From Solving Challenges

WHITE PAPER. Gable-Top Cartons Considerations For This Container Choice

Vision. Innovation. Commitment.

The Many Challenges of Plastic Recycling

Sustainable & Compostable Cutlery

Sustainability Advantages of Flexible Packaging Webinar

Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Frozen Food Packaging Systems

The content in this APC Annual Report is hereby endorsed by the Chief Executive Officer, or equivalent officer of the organisation.

Custom Trays. Design Guide

Copyright 2002,2003, C&L America Inc.

Material To Your Success

Design greener products right from the start

The Sustainable Packaging Coalition

Product Sustainability. Bombay Chamber of Commerce and Industry (BCCI) November 2013

What Really Goes in That Bale? An Overview of the National Mixed Rigid Bale Composition Study

RECYCLING INITIATIVES IN THE PRESSURE-SENSITIVE LABELLING INDUSTRY. Ingrid Brase

Sustainable Materials Management: Mission Possible?

The Mediavore s Dilemma The environmental footprint of print & digital media

The global language of business. ZESPRI International Limited Traceability Implementation Case Study

Plastic Pallet Molding 101 By Richard Morgan Wilmington Machinery

Single Polymer HDPE Solution

Valpak Data Solutions Packaging Waste Template Guidance) Packaging Data Template Guidance. Valpak Ltd August Valpak Data Solutions

Livable Region Strategy Plan Review towards Lyn Ross, BES, Eng.L. Sustainable Business Services Metro Vancouver October,2008

clear packaging welcome to easy media..

Approved University Standards Indoor Bins and Signs for Recycling, Trash and Compost. Last updated by Joe Abraham on

Know Your Ingredients: Substrates Matter

PAYNAZ COMPANY Paynaz Company Integrate with Nature

white paper Sustainability through Design Minimizing Total System Waste

Sotare. Product Specifications Internationale Parkway Woodridge, Illinois T: F:

Unraveling the Mystery of Sustainability in Packaging. AIMCAL Webinar January 2009

Offering broad product solutions by combining a rich set of manufacturing options AND bringing your custom product ideas to life through integrated

Best Practices in Supply Chain Engagement. February 2013 Jay Edwards

FoodTray. The system solution for sustainable food packaging ROBA

Australian Packaging Covenant

CARE SERVICE USER GUIDE. Sonicision System

Master Distributors Pty. Ltd.

Storlek. Product Specifications Internationale Parkway Woodridge, Illinois T: F:

Measuring the Environmental Impacts of Reusable Packaging with Life-Cycle Analysis. Presented by: Chris Shepard

New Packaging Technologies in the Meat Industry: Focus on Sustainability

This document contains the Connecticut regulations concerning recycling. This document was prepared by the State of Connecticut Department of

A leader in recycling and caring for the environment since Our Green Story

AT&T 10x Case Study: Unlocking the Potential of Connected, Reusable Pallets

PLA Recycling Enabled by Depolymerization

Life Cycle Assessment of Tetra Recart Cartons and Alternative Soup Containers on the U.S. Market July 2014

ME 4054W: SENIOR DESIGN PROJECTS

Click to edit Master title style. Packaging Challenges for the Contract Packager

LIFE CYCLE INVENTORY OF FIVE PRODUCTS PRODUCED FROM POLYLACTIDE (PLA) AND PETROLEUM-BASED RESINS SUMMARY REPORT

Signatory Name: Hally Labels Pty Ltd

Recycling of Packaging. Kiril Dimitrov

Innovation & Expertise

Transcription:

A Dordan Manufacturing White Paper 2025 S. Castle Rd. Woodstock, IL, 60098 815.334.0087 WWW.DORDAN.COM A New 4-Step Process for Lowering the Cost and Reducing the Carbon Footprint of Thermoformed Packaging By Chandler Slavin, Sustainability Coordinator& Marketing Manager

When brand owners engage a custom thermoforming organization, they are usually looking for a unique packaging solution a solution that maximizes package aesthetics, quality, and performance, while minimizing costs. Today, custom thermoforming companies must also have a deep understanding of the essentials of sustainable packaging in order to help customers lower overall environmental impacts. Sustainability expertise must be based on science, evaluation tools, experience, and a corporate commitment to practice sustainable operations. Since 1996 when Dordan Manufacturing first began developing expertise in thermoforming recycled PET (RPET), the company has developed a 4-Step Design for Sustainability Process that helps customers achieve measurable sustainability improvements. This process entails: Lower product-to-package ratio Materials selection Materials reduction Sustainability documentation Two examples will help make clear how Dordan s Design for Sustainability Process is applied. AT&T Go Phone AT&T s Go Phone aims at customers who would rather pay just for what they use and not commit themselves to a long-term contract. The old retail packaging for the Go Phone consisted of an outer RPETG clamshell for rack display, an insert color matched HIPS tray for product presentation, a RPET insert tray lid, and a graphic insert card for consumer information. AT&T/Motorola

came to Dordan through Combined Technologies, Inc. with the goals of reducing the cost of the package and, if possible, improving its sustainability. Dordan engineers began with the basic design premises of reducing the overall product-to-package ratio. An improved product-to-package ratio offers the potential to lower the carbon footprint of the package by consuming less material. A smaller package also can potentially increase the number of packages per pallet, which means fewer shipments and less overall non-renewable energy consumed and greenhouse gas emitted during shipment. Using a design that achieved a smaller product-to-package ratio and the same plastic, the Dordan packaging engineers went on to reduce the gauge thickness of the clamshell from 0.030 to 0.025 and the inner tray from 0.045 to 0.035. These gauge reductions further lowered the overall material content of the package. The reduction in gauge was accomplished with no appreciable impact on package performance. In addition to the gauge reductions, Dordan engineers also changed the front of the outer clamshell from convex to flat, thereby eliminating the snap on lid and reducing the overall material consumption further. Figure 1 shows the new Go Phone package clamshell and tray; figure 2 shows the larger old package clamshell and tray. Figure 3 shows the larger old package, left, and the slimmer new package right. Clearly the slimmer design will mean more products per pallet and an increased number of units per foot of retail rack space.

Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Dordan is a member of the Sustainable Packaging Coalition and subscribes to the coalition s comparative packaging assessment tool COMPASS, which provides environmental profiles of packages based on a life cycles approach. The COMPASS tool gives Dordan packaging engineers the industry life cycle inventory data (LCI) required to scientifically assess the overall environmental impact of a new design. Using the COMPASS tools, it is clear that AT&T/Motorola achieved a package with lower environmental impacts:

The top bar (red) represents the new Go Phone package; the bottom bar (blue) represents the old Go Phone package. The tick marks through some of the bar graphs illustrate the three life cycle phases considered for this environmental assessment: manufacture, conversion and end-of-life. It is important to note that Dordan s Design for Sustainability Process includes a wide selection of materials for consideration. These materials can be petroleum resins, bioresins, and renewable and manufactured fibers. The COMPASS tools help Dordan engineers evaluate the impact of the choice of various materials on the overall design. It is also important to point out that reducing product-to-package ratio is not always possible. The principles of material selection and material reduction must be used in concert with the other

steps in the four-step process so that all avenues for improvement are explored and maximized. TomTom GPS package for the model One LE The redesign of a package for the TomTom GPS model One LE provides a case in point for not only reducing material and cost while improving sustainability, but also moving package production from an off shore facility to Dordan Manufacturing in the U.S. and thus saving transportation costs and lowering overall transportation impacts. The TomTom GPS package presented to Dordan for redesign was a large outer clamshell for retail rack display and two thermoformed full-size insert trays with an upper pocket to display the GPS unit and a lower compartment to hold the accessories. The outer clamshell was made from 0.030 RPETG; it weighed 100.550 grams. The two insert trays were made from 0.030 RPET; they weighed 97.592 grams collectively. Taken together, this package consumed 198.142 grams of plastic. The Dordan packaging engineers began the design-for-sustainability process by working toward a lower product-to-package ratio. While doing so, it became apparent that the overall plastic content could be significantly reduced by using a 0.015 RPET lid and 0.025 HIPS tray for the GPS unit and incorporating a paperboard carton to house the tray, lid and accessories. The paperboard carton is almost universally recyclable in the North America. Figure 4 shows the old material intensive clamshell; figure 5 shows the new smaller product tray and lid; figure 6 shows the old clamshell, left, and the

new smaller product tray and lid, right. The tray and lid collectively weigh 23.659 grams, which is an 88% reduction in the weight of plastic consumed for the package. Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Data from a COMPASS comparison of the two packages tells a compelling story of the lower carbon footprint of the new versus the old package:

The top bar (red) represents the new Tom Tom package; the bottom bar (blue) represents the old Tom Tom package. It is important to note that the high water, biotic and mineral consumption and the high aquatic toxicity are the result of integrating a paperboard carton into the new Tom Tom package design. Investing in sustainability expertise The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has developed a set of guidelines to steer consumer product manufacturers away from making unsubstantiated environmental claims. Commonly used terms, such as environmentally friendly or compostable, should be avoided according to the FTC in favor of statements that can be backed up with data, for example certified compostable to the ASTM 6400 standard for compostable plastics or an environmental improvement of 50 percent in terms of lower greenhouse gas emissions.

In order to give consumer product companies the facts they need to make sound environmental decisions and subsequent claims about their packaging, Dordan Manufacturing believes that it is incumbent on supply chain companies to invest in sustainable programs and sustainable expertise. The supplier s investments in this area must be ongoing and focused not only on the package in the retail setting, but also on what happens afterward a total lifecycle view of the package from source extraction to end-of-life recovery, reuse, or disposal. Only with this kind of commitment in people and processes can the supply chain partner truly contribute to the overall success of the customer and betterment of the packaging industry. For more information on Dordan s 4-Step Design for Sustainability Process, contact the Sustainability Department at cslavin@dordan.com, call (815) 334-0087, or visit www.dordan.com.