The North American Energy Standards Board. Demand Response and Energy Efficiency Standards

Similar documents
RECOMMENDATION TO NAESB EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE For Quadrant: WEQ 1. RECOMMENDED ACTION: EFFECT OF EC VOTE TO ACCEPT RECOMMENDED ACTION:

X Accept as requested X Change to Existing Practice Accept as modified below Decline

Measurement and Verification Standards Wholesale Electric Demand Response Recommendation Summary

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. Comments of the Electricity Consumers Resource Council (ELCON)

ELCON s Comments on the Development of NAESB s Wholesale Electric Quadrant April 25, 2002

Demand Response Data Availability System (DADS) Preliminary Report Phase I & II

Issue Paper. Direct Participation of Demand Response Resources in CAISO Electricity Markets. December 22, CAISO JEP / BDC/ JDG 12/22/08, page 1

The Role of Energy Efficiency and Other Demand Resources in Helping Meet the Region s

Dave LaPlante Vice President, Markets Development September 18, 2002

US ISO Governance. Summary & Observations. HEPG March 2016

Frequently Asked Questions

Demand Response Availability Data Systems Definitions

2010 ISO/RTO Metrics Report Midwest ISO

The Role of Information and Communication Technologies in Energy Efficiency EM&V

North American Energy Standards Board

North American Energy Standards Board

Rae McQuade. May 31, 2012 Submitted via

IRC Smart Grid Standards for Demand Response. Ian Mundell Senior Business Analyst PJM Interconnection

Benefits of Demand Response

Demand Response and Scarcity Pricing

RTO Pricing: Implications for Energy Efficiency

RDRP Stakeholder Initiative

Regional Cooperation of US States on Electric Transmission Issues

The Honorable Travis Kavulla President, National Association of Regulated Utility Commissioners 1101 Vermont Avenue, NW Suite 200 Washington, DC 20005

Attached to this Notice is a description of the seven panels that will be conducted at the technical conference.

Relevant changes will be made to corresponding sections of OA and RAA.

PJM Strawman Proposal

BILLING CODE P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. [Docket No. RM ]

FERC s Standard Market Design Proposal

Demand Response. Overview. Recommendations

A New Role For States In The Administration of Regional Electricity Markets

New England Power Sector Overview

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Load Response. NARUC Energy Regulatory Partnership Program

ISO New England 2003 Demand Response Programs

MEASUREMENT AND VERIFICATION GUIDELINES FOR RETROFIT AND NEW CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS

Using Demand Response to Reduce Power Supply Costs

Energy Storage and Distributed Energy Resources (ESDER) Stakeholder Initiative. Revised Straw Proposal

PJM Demand Response Spring /6/17

ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION 201: Markets, ISO/RTOs and Grid Planning/Operations

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION POST-TECHNICAL CONFERENCE COMMENTS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY

PJM Manual 18B: Energy Efficiency Measurement & Verification Revision: 03 Effective Date: November 17, Prepared by PJM Forward Market Operations

Prepared by: ICF Resources, LLC 9300 Lee Highway Fairfax, VA 22033

Revision: 67. Prepared by

Evaluation, Measurement & Verification Essentials

Open Access Technology International, Inc. (OATI)

Craig Glazer Vice President Federal Government Policy PJM Interconnection

For purposes of this response, "State Regulators" and "state(s)" shall include the Council of the City of New Orleans.

Time to Move On: An Examination of Metering Periods for Small Business Direct Install Participants

Barriers to Entry of Demand Response Resources in SPP. A product of the SPP Market Monitoring Unit-Central

Incentives. After work is complete:

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

The Demand Response Baseline

GLOSSARY OF TERMS January 2017

NYISO Pilot Program Guide

ENERGY STORAGE: FERC S TECHNICAL CONFERENCE AND NOPR

Special Case Resources: Evaluation of the Performance and Contribution to Resource Adequacy

Demand Response Participation in PJM Markets

Demand Response Issues Facing ISO New England. August 2016

146 FERC 61,202 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Wholesale DER Interconnections

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. Integration of Variable ) Docket No. RM Energy Resources )

DOE s EPACT Report to Congress on Demand Response in Electricity Markets

M&V 2.0 Experience, Opportunities, and Challenges. Wednesday, March 30 th 11:30am 12:30pm

Revised Draft Final Proposal for Participation of Non-Generator Resources in California ISO Ancillary Services Markets

Putting Your Money Where Your Meter Is

RECOMMENDATION TO NAESB RGQ EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

Testimonials from Members and Supporters

NYISO Pilot Program Update

Demand Response Working Group

PAUL A. CENTOLELLA Vice President

Dynamic Price, Product and Messaging Specification

Demand Response Data Task Force Draft Report Outline and Work Plan

How Carbon Credits are Generated from Livestock Projects

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Wholesale Markets for the Grid of the Future Whitney Lesnicki Manager, Energy Market Design DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY

FERC Policy Goal. Wholesale Customers Benefit through Properly Structured, Competitive, and Reliable Markets

American Samoa Renewable Energy Committee

Relevant Electric Retail Regulatory Authority ( RERRA ) review process of Energy Efficiency resources and FERC Order on Petition of Declaratory Order

Open Data Access Framework

New England States Committee on Electricity

All-Source Solicitation In Utility Procurement

DER: NYISO Operations Perspective

Savings Estimation Methods for Energy Efficiency Programs: A Half-Hour Guide

Practical Experiences in Applying Savings M&V

California Independent System Operator Corporation Fifth Replacement Tariff

Standards for Business Practices and Communication Protocols for Public Utilities (Docket No. RM )

Development of a New Extended Motor Product Label for Inclusion in Energy Efficiency Programs (ID 401)

International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol. International Energy Efficiency Financing Protocol

BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION PETITION FOR CLARIFICATION OF THE NATIONAL ENERGY MARKETERS ASSOCIATION

External Capacity Performance Enhancements Second Non-Binding Vote Results

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission/RTO Training Session

M&V Fundamentals & the International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol

Electric Standard Offer Program

Residential M&V Panel: Real Time M&V Where are we, where could we go, what would it take?

New Jersey Board of Public Utilities Energy Master Plan First Public Stakeholder Session Newark, NJ October 23, 2006

Technical Assistance between ERERA, WAGPA, NARUC, and OPSI Activity No. 2; Abuja, Nigeria June Overview of OPSI

Demand Response and Energy Efficiency Programs In the Deregulated Texas Electric Market

Transmission Cost Allocation in the Midwest

SPP RE Regional Reliability Standards Development Process Manual

Transcription:

The North American Energy Standards Board National EM&V Protocols Connecting the Dots on Emerging Fronts Northeast Energy Efficiency Partnerships 2012 Annual Public Meeting Washington D.C. December 12, 2012 1

NAESB Profile 2

Organization by Quadrant and Segment Wholesale Gas 5 Segments 1. End Users 2. Local Distribution 3. Pipelines 4. Producers 5. Services Wholesale Electric 7 Segments 1. End Users 2. Distribution/LSE 3. Transmission 4. Generation 5. Marketers/Brokers 6. Independent Grid Operators/Planners 7. Technology and Services Retail Gas 3 Segments 1. End Users/Public Agencies 2. Utilities 3. Service Providers/Suppliers Retail Electric 3 Segments 1. End Users/Public Agencies 2. Distributors 3. Service Providers/Suppliers 3

Voluntary Standards From the organization s perspective, all standards are voluntary and may be provided to regulatory agencies as status reports as they are published. The standards and model business practices may incorporate regional or operational differences Regulatory agencies may choose to adopt standards or model business practices, but NAESB will not advocate such action. The organization will not monitor for compliance, provide performance measures for compliance, nor will it define sanctions for non-compliance. The organization will not advocate before any regulatory body. 4

Relationship of NAESB Standards and Model Business Practices to Policy NAESB does not set policy. We defer to state and federal agencies in determining policy. Our work products are intended to focus on the implementation of policy decisions by providing a road map for the interactions between the various parties. Our standards and model business practices recommend practices for alternative regulatory models but leave the decision as to the appropriate policy or model to the regulators. 5

Characteristics of NAESB Standards Development Process: Transparency Inclusion Balance of Interests Documented and Accessible Process Support of the Regulatory Process Accountability 6

NAESB Wholesale & Retail Electric Market DR Measurement and Verification Standards 7

Driving Factors: Standards development is not typically cited as one of a set of driving factors for why a market embraces a direction Purpose: Transparency: accessible and understandable M&V protocols for DR programs and services Standards can though bring the industry together in how regulatory policy is implemented They can also bring efficiencies and cost savings to a market which would make a direction such as expansion of DR and EE more attractive to the administrators and participants Accountability: Criteria that will enable program administrators to accurately measure the performance of demand resources Consistency: Business Practice Standards applicable across all the wholesale markets M&V Standards for DR and EE can simplify how the programs are planned, implemented and evaluated by having more uniform metrics. 8

Wholesale Electric Demand Response Services: Energy Service Capacity Service Reserve Service Regulation Service The five performance evaluation methodologies: Maximum Base Load Meter Before / Meter After Baseline Type-I Baseline Type-II Metering Generator Output 9

What do the wholesale DR M&V standards cover: Categorizing demand response products and services Providing support for the measurement and verification of these products and services Meter data reporting deadlines Advanced notification Telemetry intervals Meter accuracy for after the fact metering Meter data reporting intervals Adjustment windows There are 141 WEQ DR standards (WEQ-015 set of standards) 10

What don t they cover: Duplicating processes undertaken in the ISO-RTO stakeholder community Where there were difficulties achieving uniformity because of differences in the programs offered by the ISOs and RTOs, transparency was provided instead of introducing more specificity or granularity Wholesale programs administered by groups other than ISOs and RTOs 11

What do the retail DR standards cover: Establish the criteria for the use of equipment, technology and procedures to quantify the Demand Reduction Value General: Advance Notification, Deployment Time, Reduction Deadlines, Release/Recall, Normal Operations, DR Availability Measurement, Aggregation, Transparency of Requirements Telemetry: Telemetry Requirements, Accuracy, Intervals, Measurements, Communication Protocols, Governor Control Equivalents, On Site Generation Requirements After the Fact Metering: Requirements, Accuracy, Equipment Details, Reporting Deadlines, Reporting Intervals, lock Accuracy, VEE Methods, On Site Generation Requirements 12

What do the retail DR standards cover: Performance Evaluation: acceptable baselines and alternative performance measurements for each type of DR product For baseline information: baseline window, calculation types, sampling precision, exclusion rules, baseline adjustments, adjustment windows For Event Information: use of real-time telemetry, use of after the fact telemetry, performance window, measurement type For Special Processing: highly variable load logic, on site generation requirements 114 Retail DR Standards (REQ-013) 13

NAESB Wholesale & Retail Electric Market EE Measurement and Verification Standards 14

What do the wholesale EE standards cover (WEQ-021): Designed to create an standard method for quantifying the energy reductions from energy efficiency measures Based on services and products administered by PJM and ISO-NE, several state protocols, federal energy management program M&V standards and the International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol 69 standards and definitions including energy efficiency baseline and demand reduction value. Criteria for the use of energy efficiency products in organized wholesale electricity markets, general measurement and verification plan requirements, and detailed criteria of acceptable measurement and verification methodologies 15

What do the Retail EE Standards Cover (REQ-019): Designed to create an standard method for quantifying the energy reductions from energy efficiency measures Applicable to the M&V of electrical energy (kwh) and demand (kw) impacts referred to as reductions or savings of EE programs offered to retail customers Several different M&V methodologies defined including calibrated simulation, partially measured retrofits, retrofits, regression analysis, deemed savings and large scale billing analysis Verification components for projects that verify EE baseline conditions EE baselines, statistical significance, savings calculations, demand reduction calculations, monitoring parameters, data validation, 51 standards and definitions 16

Relationship with Government Agencies 17

NAESB Access to Standards by State Commissions All retail electric and retail gas standards that are state jurisdictional are provided to the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners for distribution to interested state commission staff The NAESB record of minutes, work papers, voting, comments related to the standards are available for review, including all minority positions noted in comments Related transcripts from EC, Board and other subcommittee or task force meetings are also made upon request to any state commission and can be purchased by any other interested party Any state commission can join NAESB with membership fees paid by NARUC 18

NAESB Filing of Standards with FERC All wholesale electric and wholesale gas standards that are federally jurisdictional are filed with the FERC The NAESB record of minutes, work papers, voting, comments related to the standards are forwarded, including all minority positions noted in comments Related transcripts from EC, Board and other subcommittee or task force meetings are made available to FERC and can be purchased by any other interested party Any regulatory agency can request access to or copies of NAESB standards 19

FERC Actions Related to NAESB DR and EE Standards: April 2010 -- FERC adopted wholesale electric quadrant DR M&V standards in Order No. 676-F and suggested additional specificity would be helpful May 2011 -- NAESB submitted report with additional granularity in the DR M&V standards in May 2011 April 2012 -- FERC issued a NOPR on the NAESB Phase 2 DR and EE M&V standards on April 2012 July 2012 -- Comments were due to the FERC on the NOPR 20