Aerial Applications of Altosid 5% for the Area-Wide Control of Aedes aegypti and albopictus Populations

Similar documents
LARVICIDING APPLICATION TECHNOLOGY

Insecticide Resistance Testing at a Mosquito Control Program

Best Management Practices for Vector Surveillance and Control

VectoBac WG TECHNICAL USE SHEET. Bacterial Larvicide

Make a. Difference. with DeltaGard. // High performance with low application rates // Help protect communities from mosquitoes that may carry diseases

To reduce the abundance of adult mosquitoes of the Culex species through the use of Integrated Mosquito Management (IMM) practices.

The Town of Johnstown s Mosquito Management Program

FEATURES Bacterial larvicide Highly specifi c activity on mosquitoes Water-dispersible granule High-potency dry formulation

Mosquito Control Maps and Apps for Local Governments. Chris Fox

City of Keller Mosquito Control and Abatement Program Updated Page 2 of 5

Larviciding and Adulticiding. Brunswick County Mosquito Control Lee Stephens

RICHMOND COUNTY MOSQUITO CONTROL

Current concept on dengue vector control. Roger Frutos University Montpellier 2

Florida Gas Transmission Section #1 Hydrostatic Test

Florida Gas Transmission 24-Inch Pipeline Hydrostatic Test

Best Practice for Integrated Mosquito Management in Anastasia Mosquito Control District

Invasive Mosquito Species Response Plan 2016 Coachella Valley Mosquito and Vector Control District

Request for Non Treatment of Property Form

Commonwealth of Massachusetts STATE RECLAMATION AND MOSQUITO CONTROL BOARD Best Management Practice Plan Methuen

NORTH SHORE MOSQUITO ABATEMENT DISTRICT. NPDES Permit ILG87 PESTICIDE DISCHARGE MANAGEMENT PLAN (PDMP)

Best Management Practices for Integrated Mosquito Management. American Mosquito Control Association

Midland County Mosquito Control 2017 Technical Program

Orange County Mosquito Control Spraying Frequently Asked Questions

City of Corinth Mosquito and West Nile Virus Control Policy

AN ECOLOGICAL SURVEY OF DENGUE VECTOR MOSQUITOS IN CENTRAL LAO PDR

THE AMERICAN MOSQUITO CONTROL ASSOCIATION'S NEW PESP 5-YEAR 2010 STRATEGY DOCUMENT

Dumpit! Drainit! Scrubitclean!

Midland County Mosquito Control 2018 Technical Program

MOSQUITO CONTROL BY COMMERCIAL AND GOVERNMENT AGENCIES. Application Flow Rate (fl oz/min) Application Speed (MPH)

CREATING HEALTHIER SPACES FOR YOUR CUSTOMERS WHERE THEY LIVE, WORK AND PLAY.

MERUS 2.0. ACTIVE INGREDIENT: Pyrethrins, a botanical insecticide %

Integrated Mosquito Management: Prince William County s Approach to Zika Virus and Other Mosquito-borne Diseases

NORTH SHORE MOSQUITO ABATEMENT DISTRICT. NPDES Permit ILG87 PESTICIDE DISCHARGE MANAGEMENT PLAN (PDMP)

Florida Gas Transmission Section #3 Hydrostatic Test

MOSQUIRON Solid Mosquito Larvicide Containing Novaluron Residual Activity Barry Tyler, Ph.D. Pestalto

Integrated Vector Management & Response Plan

A Review of Barrier Applications to Control Mosquitoes: Craig A. Stoops, PhD, BCE Chief Science Officer

Mosquito Control Capabilities in the U.S. O c t o b e r 2017

Protocol for a small-scale In2Care Mosquito Trap field test by Pest Management Professionals

Field Trials of Barrier Treatment Using Mavrik Perimeter (taufluvalinate)

CHESAPEAKE S AERIAL LARVICIDING PROGRAM

FREIGHT AND INTERMODAL SYSTEMS

Health risks from mosquitoes in rainwater tanks A brief history of arboviruses and rainwater tanks in SEQ

Technical Use Bulletin for VectoBac WG For Dengue Vector Control in Asia

Presenter: Pattamaporn Kittayapong, Ph.D. Mahidol University, Thailand

Aedes vexans Culex Mix Coquillettidia perturbans Aedes sollicitans Delaware River Basin

Effect of water supply system installation on distribution of water storage containers and abundance of Aedes aegypti

TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY NETWORK IMMC

Chesapeake Mosquito Control Commission

Funding Critical to the Project Provided by: Washington Tree Fruit Research Commission And the Oregon Sweet Cherry Commission

ACTIVE INGREDIENT: (S)-Methoprene (CAS # )... 5% OTHER INGREDIENTS:... 95% TOTAL: %

Received: 14 March 2012 Revised: 10 January 2013 Accepted article published: 8 February 2013 Published online in Wiley Online Library:

Appendix III. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services: Soil Types Letter

The Newsletter of the Florida Mosquito Control Association Volume 9, Issue Number 5 Sept/Oct 2009

PIERCE COUNTY PROGRAM FOR RESPONSE TO WEST NILE VIRUS Amended 2007

CANYON COUNTY MOSQUITO ABATEMENT DISTRICT 9719 Booker Lane Nampa, Idaho 83686

Are you ready for AMCA in 2007???

Marin/Sonoma Mosquito and Vector Control District Pesticide Application Plan

$300, law enforcement officers from 39 law enforcement agencies, including 23 sheriff s offices, 10 police

Better Vector Control; From Paper Maps to GIS for St. Louis County, MO. Nikki Atwal (GIS Analyst) St. Louis County GIS Service Center

FourStar Technical Review

Tip of the Month: Halloween is coming to your local neighborhood!

All Citrus Acreage, by Variety and Survey Year, and Changes Between Surveys Florida: Specialty fruit. Total

Preventing the Bite Day and Night: Harris County Public Health s Comprehensive Approach to Vector-Borne Disease Management

Fires Tires that catch on fire are difficult to put out. The petroleum-based rubber in tires releases hydrocarbon fumes as it burns, which pollute

REPORT MARKET. State of the MOSQUITO INSIDE

2018 Annual Report. Submitted to Canyon County Board of County Commissioners

Evaluation of the Red Imported Fire Ant Foraging Behavior

KNOW YOUR VOTING RIGHTS FLORIDA

ZOECON RF-437 MOSQUITO GROWTH REGULATOR SR-20. Strike Midge Control

Sanitation Services & Fleet Management. FY 2015 Budget Workshop

Miami-Dade Water & Sewer Department. Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department 1

American Mosquito Control Association

Public Health COMMUNITY-WIDE MOSQUITO MANAGEMENT. Department of Entomology E-52-W. Timothy J. Gibb and Gary W. Bennett, Extension Entomologists

Building and Codes Department. Fiscal Year 2016 Budget Presentation

Targeted Promotional Campaign Report for Recreational Product

Aedes albopictus in Ontario

LARVAL MOSQUITO CONTROL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING

Capital Planning and ROW Permitting Maps and Apps for Local Government. Chris Fox Scott Oppmann

APARTNERSHIP STRATEGY DOCUMENT A

ALTOSID PELLETS MOSQUITO GROWTH REGULATOR. ACTIVE CONSTITUENT: 40 g/kg (S)-METHOPRENE GROUP 7A INSECTICIDE

SUMMARY SUMMARY

Addressing Community Wildfire Risk: A Review and Assessment of Local Regulatory and Planning Tools

WELCOME TO PEST CONTROL 102. Presented by

TURLOCK MOSQUITO ABATEMENT DISTRICT Annual Report

Summary of Citrus Budget for the Indian River Production Region

MASSACHUSETTS MOSQUITO CONTROL ANNUAL OPERATIONS REPORT

BMP Becker Microbial Products, Inc.

Industrial Land Near JAXPORT & ICTF

Dual-action efficacy. Adulticide for Mosquito Control. Delivers more control of natural mosquito populations

Florida Clean Vessel Act Program

Land Use and Zoning Workshop Agricultural Use and Exemptions

Nueces Agriculture IMPROVING FOOD & FIBER PRODUCTION

Dengue control: the relevance of transdisciplinary interaction

GA Invasive Species of Interest to GMCA. Ray Noblet, E. W. Gray, & C. Bargeron UGA Dept. of Entomology

IS YOUR NEIGHBOR. Landscaping to Reduce Wildfire Risk. South Florida Edition

Mosquito image from

Coachella Valley Mosquito and Vector Control District Pesticide Application Plan 2016

Comprehensive Sanitation Plan

Transcription:

Aerial Applications of Altosid 5% for the Area-Wide Control of Aedes aegypti and albopictus Populations Christopher R. Lesser/Mark D. Latham Manatee County Mosquito Control District

Domestic Mosquitoes Aedes aegypti Aedes albopictus Culex quinquefasciatus Culex nigripalpus

Rules to Remember for Controlling Mosquitoes Adulticides: Must present small droplets to actively flying mosquitoes typically at evening or night Larvicides: Must introduce the chemical to the water Social Concerns: Must be able to introduce intervention w/o creating havoc with the public Cost Limited Funds

Compare/Contrast: Traditional vs. Domestic Mosquitoes Traditional Ae. taeniorhynchus, vexans, Ps., Cx. Salt marshes, pastures, roadside ditches, rural Species Source Domestics Aegypti, albopictus Small and isolated containers, tree holes, urban Night/evening Activity Period Daytime Concentrated and focused; predictable pop. spikes Population Dynamics Widespread and diffuse; continual emergence Moderate to High Chemical Susceptibility Low to Moderate (resistance to many OP/SP adulticides)

If you can eliminate those used tires, buckets, trash, and 15-year old boat from your backyard then your mosquitoes will be eliminated

I already pay $40/year in taxes for mosquito control Isn t that what you get paid to do?

There is no Santa Claus.. but in an Ideal World Best form of domestic mosquito control is sanitation and source reduction but. Public won t do it Forced sanitation is difficult and unpopular (illegal) And access by us is often difficult/impossible (dogs, guns, knives, fences, labor, time) Scope: Each domestic inspection 20min/home x 6hr field day = 18homes per day = 6 acres/day (for 2 inspectors)!!!!

Domestic Complaints received by Manatee County MCD June, July, August 2011

25,000 acre treatment area Need 4,200 days for 2 people to make a complete sanitation operation (11.5 yrs) Or need 140 employees to make the complete inspection every 30-days Cost - $7.0 million in direct/indirect employee costs

Why Do We Control Mosquitoes Nuisance Control/Quality of Life Economic Importance Disease Suppression/Public Health Dengue Yellow Fever

2011 (July) (1) DENV-? Martin 2011 (Sept) (1) DENV -1 Hillsborough DENV-1 2009: 27 cases 2010: 68 cases 2011: 0 cases 2011 (Sept) (2) DENV-1 Palm Beach 2010 (2) DENV -3 Broward 2011 (Jan. Aug. Sept.) (3) 2010 DENV -1 DENV -2 Miami - Dade Miami - Dade

From Florida Keys Mosquito Control District

Dengue Key West vs. Singapore No. of Dengue Cases 10000 9000 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 Key West Singapore 65 Key West Cases 2007 2008 2009 2010

Incidence of Dengue: Key West vs. Singapore 350 Dengue Cases per 100,000 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Key West Singapore 2007 2008 2009 2010

Successes and Not-So-Successful Worldwide, there has been some success in controlling aegypti but mainly in those countries where military rule is employed.. via Dr. Fred Soper (Thailand, Vietnam, Brazil, Cuba) The US has very poor success in numerous cases (none successful) Miami-Dade 10 yr pgm employing door-to-door sanitation.. mid 1980 s to present Code Enforcement

Domestic Inspections in Miami-Dade Conducted November thru May 8 teams of 2 inspectors, each team assigned a section (square mile) at a time All accessible premises inspected Containers emptied, yards sprayed when necessary, educational flyers distributed to every premise 65,000 premises inspected annually Whole county inspected every 5-7 years No significant change between 1995 2001

Other US Attempts: Florida Keys - Response to Dengue: 27 Human cases in 2009; 67 cases in 2010, 5% infected Added 8-10 new inspectors covering an area 2x4 mile (5,000 acres), aerial larviciding, ground adulticiding, source reduction, public education, TV and radio, lethal ovitraps.. 2 years later 15% reduction

Purpose & Objective Continue a 5-year research program to develop an effective IPM strategy for areawide control of Ae aegypti and albopictus Previous Research evaluated multiple control strategies and found: Truck applied ULV larvicides and adulticides can be effective in some locations/habitats when sprayed in combination.. but expensive and time consuming Truck applied ULV larvicides (alone) and truck applied ULV adulticides (alone) have no effects upon reducing domestic mosquito populations

Study Location

Study Location

Germination Paper

Eggs on Paper

Larvicide Adulticide Larvicide + Adulticide Control Efficacy of 3 Techniques For Ae. aegypti/albopictus Control (Values Indicate Average # of Eggs & Larvae at 15 Sampling Sites within each group) Weekly adulticiding & larviciding activities started on 7/21. 239.3 183.1 168.6 158.4 166.1 153.8 142.7 143.3 147.2 158.9 135.9 131.3 126.4 127.9 132.1 115.5 105.5 90.7 105.0 87.2 97.7 81.1 77.3 102.5 82.2 82.5 97.5 77.9 85.3 70.1 69.1 79.6 74.1 61.7 57.5 51.3 52.1 51.5 53.1 40.7 45.7 46.7 46.4 46.4 30.6 42.1 43.3 33.8 32.6 34.7 25.4 20.1 24.0 31.4 21.1 34.5 Larviciding Stopped 3.9 7.7 7.7 3.2 6.3 0 6/29 7/7 7/13 7/20 7/28 8/3 8/11 8/17 8/24 9/1 9/8 9/14 9/21 9/28 10/5 10/12 Date of Collection 210.1 240.0 300 250 200 150 100 50 0

Percent Population Change Efficacy of 3 Techniques for Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus Control; Data Normalized by Location and Corrected for Control Variation 400 350 377.06 Larvicide Adulticide 300 250 262.00 Larvicide and Adulticide Control 200 150 167.51 207.51 159.99 135.74 100 73.23 81.17 70.50 72.64 72.32 62.42 50 18.02 7.78 30.32 34.62 2.05 0 0.00-25.83-50 -25.16-8.17-27.12-42.06-46.03-70.44-56.51-61.94-76.70-78.30-80.08-84.12-72.94-100 7/20 7/28 8/3 8/11 8/17 8/24 9/1 9/8 9/14 9/21 9/28 10/5 10/12 Date of Ovitrap Collection

Would Aerial Applications Be More Effective?

Methodologies 2011 Two study sites selected (128 and 413 acres); both within older residential neighborhoods in/near Bradenton, FL with history of high domestic mosquito problems Spray Platform: Hughes 500D; spray block treated 1x per fortnight starting in mid August for a total of 3 applications Larvicide = Altosid 5% (diluted to 1% tank mix) delivered through spray system at 240psi yielding a VMD of ca. 250-400microns at final application rate of 19.5 fl oz/ac in a 200ft swath (equivalent to 4.0 oz/ac Altosid 5%)

Methodologies (cont.) Measured mosquito population dynamics via 15 ovitraps located within each of the study sites; eggs and larvae were collected and counted weekly Selective hatching of collected ovi-strips (paper) found 95% Aedes aegypti and 5% albopictus in each of the study sites Larvicide applications made late in the evening/early morning when human outdoor activity would be predictably low. Generally between midnight and 2am.

Efficacy of Aerial Larviciding upon Ae. aegypti/albopictus Populations (Values Indicate Average # of Eggs & Larvae at 15 Sampling Sites within each group) 161.5 167.2 Aerial Larvicide - Methoprene on 8/16, 8/31 and 9/14; Midnight - 2am 128-acres Control Treatment 130.8 180 160 140 107.1 110.1 104.3 99.4 94.7 88.7 91.2 78.2 69.7 66.9 62.2 63.6 70.2 57.0 60.5 62.3 59.8 53.8 53.5 55.7 51.6 52.1 48.2 40.7 32.8 31.1 30.5 27.2 24.1 64.6 60.0 64.1 60.6 52.1 51.9 34.9 29.9 25.2 26.1 23.1 31.4 18.1 23.3 9.6 5/2 5/9 5/16 5/23 5/31 6/6 6/13 6/20 6/27 7/5 7/11 7/18 7/25 8/1 8/8 8/15 8/22 8/29 9/6 9/12 9/19 9/26 10/3 10/10 Date of Collection 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Number of Eggs and Larvae

Results The practices of aerial larviciding appears to have a significant effect upon reducing Ae. aegypti and albopictus populations. About 75% in this study Delivery Systems: Aerial applications are a much more effective chemical delivery method as compared to ground-ulv larvicide applications probably as a result of a more uniform chemical application. (2010 and 2011 data showed Ground Larviciding had no population reducing effects on local domestic mosquitoes)

Discussion Aerial ULV adulticiding would likely not be an effective control agent for domestic mosquitoes for a number of different reasons (mosquito behavior, meteorology and spray cloud dynamics, public acceptance, etc) Aerial ULV applications appear to be very effective Ground ULV applications likely not applicable to area-wide applications given time constraints and costs This study was conduct under the purview of an EUP from FDACS

QUESTIONS? Christopher.Lesser@manateemosquito.com