Valuing Ecosystem Services: Oysters, Denitrification, and Nutrient Trading Programs

Similar documents
Watershed Technical Workgroup Approval Decision Meeting. December 1, 2016

Quantifying Ecosystem Services of Restored Oyster Reefs

Jeffrey Cornwell, Michael Owens, Lisa Kellogg Thanks to RIE Newell and K Paynter

Modeling the water quality benefits of tributary-scale oyster reef restoration

Evaluating the Potential of Oyster Aquaculture and Oyster Restoration as a BMP for Nutrient Reduction. STAC Review. Panel Members.

Annual Update. Large-Scale Oyster Restoration in Support of the Chesapeake Bay Agreement Oyster Goal. Stephanie Reynolds Westby, NOAA

Briefing on the Oyster BMP Expert Panel s Recommendations in the Approved First Report

Chesapeake Bay Oyster Metrics Workgroup Report Summary

The Pennsylvania State University. The Graduate School. Department of Agricultural Economics, Sociology, and Education

BMPs for Nutrient Reduction

Models for the assessment of sustainability and risk in fish and shellfish aquaculture

Dynamic Coupling of Hydrodynamic and Ecological Models

Sustainable exploitation and management of autogenic ecosystem engineers: application to oysters in Chesapeake Bay

Integrating Water Quality and Natural Filters into Maryland s Marine Spatial Planning Efforts

Impacts of Climate Change on Coastal Virginia and Chesapeake Bay:

Chesapeake Bay Oyster Brief

Commercial Shellfish Aquaculture in the Inland Bays

Use of Market and Voluntary Approaches for Reducing Nonpoint Source Pollution in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed

Requested Review of Procedures of the UMD/MAWP Best Management Practice Project Year 2. STAC BMP Efficiencies Task Group

Ami E. Wilbur Shellfish Research Hatchery Department of Biology & Marine Biology Center for Marine Science University of North Carolina Wilmington

Climate Change Impacts of Most Concern for CB Agreement Goal & Outcome Attainment

Assessing the Ecosystem Services of Oyster Restoration

Oyster BMP Expert Panel First Incremental Report. September 22, 2016

Overview of Ecosystem Services Quantification and Valuation Approaches

Shellfish aquaculture and nutrient management science and policy

AN UPDATED MODEL FOR ESTIMATING THE TMDL- RELATED BENEFITS OF OYSTER REEF RESTORATION

Application of SLAMM to Estimate N removal services in tidal wetlands

Oyster BMP Expert Panel First Incremental Report. December 19, 2016

Fact Sheet. Pennsylvania s Chesapeake Bay Tributary Strategy Goals for Nutrient and Sediment Reduction and Habitat Restoration

Climate Change and Ecological Forecasting in the Chesapeake Bay

CHESAPEAKE BAY TMDL PHASE III WIP NORTHERN VIRGINIA OPENING STAKEHOLDER MEETING AUGUST 17, 2018 NORMAND GOULET NVRC

GSMFC Special Oyster Session: Louisiana. Patrick Banks Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission Annual Meeting October 13, 2016

Fact Sheet. Chesapeake Bay Water Quality

Optimal Investment in Ecological Conservation and Restoration Projects under Climate Change: A Spatial Intertemporal Analysis

OYSTER HABITAT RESTORATION- HOW MUCH IS ENOUGH? USING ECOSYSTEM SERVICES TO SET RESTORATION OBJECTIVES ON A SYSTEM WIDE SCALE

Valuing Ecosystem Services: InVEST Tools. Adrian L. Vogl, Ph.D. The Natural Capital Project, Stanford University

Climate Change and Oysters in the Chesapeake Bay

Aquaculture and Fisheries: Shared Threats and Shared Opportunities

Chesapeake Bay Program Indicator Analysis and Methods Document Reducing Pollution Indicators Updated May 2018

The FARM model in Long Island Sound: How important is nutrient removal through shellfish harvest?

STAC Review of Chesapeake Bay Program Phase 6 Watershed Model

Coastal studies in Long Term Ecological Research. Dan Reed Santa Barbara Coastal LTER

Impacts of Climate Change on Coastal Virginia and Chesapeake Bay:

Assessment and Modelling of Baltic Ecosystem Response (AMBER)

Long term Target: Restore oyster populations (complete construction/seeding) in 10 tributaries of the Chesapeake Bay by 2025.

Future Growth of the U.S. Aquaculture Industry and Associated Environmental Quality Issues

Virginia Oyster Restoration

Restoring the lost kelp forests of Port Phillip Bay. Steve Swearer

Oysters A Bit of History

Todd M. Swannack, Ph.D., Candice D. Piercy, Ph.D. & Patrick S. O Brien, P.E. Integrated Ecological Modeling Environmental Laboratory, US Army ERDC

Carrying Capacity and Economic Considerations for Shellfish Aquaculture

Farm. Offshore Aquaculture

Lake Worth Lagoon Connections: Land-Based Sources of Pollution, Fisheries Habitats and the Florida Coral Reef Tract

URBAN STREAM RESTORATION BMP

Status and trend analysis in the Maryland water quality monitoring program

4 TH ANNUAL CAPE COASTAL CONFERENCE

IEc. Nitrogen Loading and Water Quality on Cape Cod: Modeling the Costs of Inaction. Presentation by Industrial Economics, Incorporated

for the Chesapeake Bay

Continuous Monitoring Network Strategy Continued Discussion. Peter Tango November 18, 2015 DIWG-INWG SERC

Effects of changes in biotoxin closures on recreational shellfish harvest demand

Reducing Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Sediment Pollution Progress Update. Jeff Corbin, Senior Advisor to the EPA Administrator

Climate Change, Marsh Erosion and the Chesapeake Bay TMDL

Jerrit Askvig, Leah Bode, Nathan Cushing, Colin Mullery December 1, 2010

Linking optimization and ecological models in a decision support tool for oyster restoration and management

Oyster Restoration Feasibility Study

Water Quality Resilience and Policy in an Integrated Urban and Agricultural Water Basin

Sustainable Fisheries GIT: Oyster Restoration Progress Update

Spatial Variability in Nutrient and Sediment Loadings due to Climate Change at Chesapeake Bay Watersheds

Factors Affecting Distribution of the Atlantic Surfclam (Spisula solidissima), A Continental Shelf Biomass Dominant, During a Period of Climate Change

Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement Final draft January 29, 2014

Chesapeake Bay TMDL 2017 Mid-Point Assessment

U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works. Hearing on The Impacts of Global Warming on the Chesapeake Bay. September 26, 2007

Freshwater diversion, oyster reef restoration and fisheries sustainability on the Primary Public Seed Grounds of Louisiana

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS: URBAN STREAM RESTORATION BMP. David Wood Chesapeake Stormwater Network. Lisa Fraley-McNeal Center for Watershed Protection

How Nutrient Trading Can Help Restore the Chesapeake Bay

STATE OF THE BAY IN 2012

Finalizing the Chesapeake Bay Health Index (BHI)

Dead-Zones and Coastal Eutrophication: Case- Study of Chesapeake Bay W. M. Kemp University of Maryland CES Horn Point Laboratory Cambridge, MD

2017 Midpoint Assessment: Year of Decision. October 19, 2017 PA Phase III WIP Steering Committee Meeting

2017 Revised Guide for Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Two-year Milestones

NITROGEN REMOVAL FROM OAKLAND BAY AND PUGET SOUND THROUGH SHELLFISH HARVEST

Saltmarsh ecosystem services under multiple stress Context-dependent effects of sediment deposition & increased inundation

Chesapeake Assessment Scenario Tool CAST

Clean Water Optimization Tool Case Study: Queen Anne s County

Ecosystem Services BUCK KLINE AND VIJAY A SATYAL

NOAA Restoration Center Community-based Restoration Program

TAMAR ESTUARY 2011 REPORT CARD ECOSYSTEM HEALTH ASSESSMENT PROGRAM. Working together for healthy waterways

Nutrient Retention in Restored Streams and Floodplains: A Review and Synthesis

CERP System Status Reports The Evolution from

National Strategy for Evaluating Soil Health Measurements. Wayne Honeycutt & Steven Shafer

Stock Assessment of Oysters in the Chesapeake Bay, Maryland

Modeling the Urban Stormwater (and the rest of the watershed) Katherine Antos, Coordinator Water Quality Team U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office

Linking Marine and Terrestrial Models. Jodie Toft, the CAMEO and Marine NatCap teams

Chesapeake Bay Program Models:

The Lower Galveston Bay Watershed: Potential Oil Spill Impacts

Rubio, A (1) ; Winberg, P (1) ; Davies, H (2) ;Warner, R (1) ; Kirkendale, L (1) ; Davis, AR (1)

Sustainable Shellfish aquaculture the Ecosystem approach

Healthy Watersheds Forest/TMDL Project. Chesapeake Bay Maintain Healthy Watersheds GIT Presentation March 29 th, 2016

FINAL REPORT. West Falmouth Harbor Oyster Bed (Reef) Development Project April 24, 2017

Salt Marshes and Sea Level Rise: Implications for Blue Carbon

Transcription:

Valuing Ecosystem Services: Oysters, Denitrification, and Nutrient Trading Programs Geret S. DePiper, Douglas W. Lipton, and Romuald N. Lipcius May 21, 2015 The opinions expressed in this presentation are solely the authors, and do not represent those of NOAA Fisheries

Research Goals Analyze the role of denitrification/nitrogen sequestration and harvest in optimal management of natural oyster reefs Assess NPV of Harris Creek restoration initiative

Chesapeake Bay Nitrogen Phosphorus Sediment US EPA (2010)

Bio-economic Models Wild stock Kasperski & Wieland (2010) Mykoniatis & Ready (2015) Aquaculture Miller (2009)

Powell et al. (2006) Mann & Powell (2007) Powell & Klinck (2007) Shell as limiting factor

Biological model Jordan-Cooley et al. (2011) Three equations governing oyster population dynamics O = live oyster population B = oyster shell (reef) S = sedimentation

Live oyster population Oyster growth = logistic growth disease and predation smothering do dt = O r(1 ) + ε µ O[ K ε ] O 1+ exp( h( + B S) 2

Oyster shell Reef growth = Oyster mortality Shell degradation db dt µ ε = O[ + ε ] γb O 1+ exp( h( + B S) 2

Sedimentation Sediment rate = Deposition rate erosion ds dt = C exp( η ( O + B))exp( F0O y 0 exp( y 0 C exp( η ( O y 0 + B)) )) βs

Economic Value Value = Harvest + Denitrification + Sequestration Harvest Denitrification Sequestration O x = ( ph ch (1 ( )) x K = = p N F0O y0 C exp( η ( O + p N λ(1 exp( exp( y y O r(1 ) + ε µ αo( K ε ) O 1+ exp( h( + B S)) 2 0 0 B)) )))

Numerical solution Deterministic Dynamic programming CompEcon Toolbox for Matlab 5% discount rate 3%, 7%, 11.8% sensitivity $28.9 bu -1 harvest price $18.63, $44.79 sensitivity $10 lb -1 nitrogen price $0, $4, $20 sensitivity Jordan-Cooley et al. (2011)

0.035 Oyster harvest 0.03 Oyster Harvest Volume (m 3 ) 0.025 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.005 0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 Year Baseline Low Carrying Capacity Low Growth Rate High Growth Rate High Predation

Oyster stock 0.2 0.16 Oyster Volume (m 3 ) 0.12 0.08 0.04 0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 Year Baseline Low Predation High Predation Low Carrying Capacity

Net Present Value 4.5 4 3.5 Total Value ($ m -2 ) 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 Year Baseline High Nutrient Credit Low Carrying Capacity

Harris Creek Restoration $31.6 million restoration of 377 acre oyster reef Assumptions: 6 years until restored Value begins to be generated in year 7 50 year time horizon (ensure sustainability assessed) NPV calculation for each modeled scenario

Harris Creek Restoration NPV 24 simulations over 50 year time horizon 16 positive NPV (67%) 8 negative NPV (33%) Metric Mean Median STD Min Max NPV $ million 19.84 18.55 27.2-21.1 67.3 Break-Even years 15.25 14 6.6-34 Oyster Stock Oysters m -1 380 430 170 0 580

Conclusions Optimal management includes both ecosystem service provisioning and harvest Reef level heterogeneity important Dynamics more sensitive to biological vs economic parameters Harris Creek NPV positive for 67% of simulations Private funding for restoration likely not viable

Questions? References Jordan-Cooley, W. C., R. N. Lipcius, L. B. Shaw, J. Shen, and J. Shi. 2011. Bistability in a Differential Equation Model of Oyster Reef Height and Sediment Accumulation. Journal of Theoretical Biology 289: 1 11. Kasperski, S., and R. Wieland. 2010. When is it Optimal to Delay Harvesting? The Role of Ecological Services in the Northern Chesapeake Bay Oyster Fishery. Marine Resource Economics 24: 361 85. Mann, R., and E. N. Powell. 2007. Why Oyster Restoration Goals in the Chesapeake Bay Are Not and Probably Cannot be Achieved. Journal of Shellfish Research 26(4): 905-17. Miller, A. L. 2009. An Economic Evaluation of the Nutrient Assimilation Potential for Commercial Oyster Aquaculture in the Chesapeake Bay. M.S. Thesis. Blacksburg: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Mykoniatis, N., and R. Ready. 2015. Spatial Harvest Regimes for a Sedentary Fishery. Environmental and Resource Economics: 1-31. Powell, E. N., J. N. Kraeuter & K. A. Ashton-Alcox. 2006. How long does oyster shell last on an oyster reef? Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 69:531 542 Powell, E. N., and J. M. Klinck. 2007. Is Oyster Shell a Sustainable Estuarine Resource? Journal of Shellfish Research, 26(1): 181-94.

Full Results Model Total $/m 2 Harvest $/m 2 Denitrification $/m 2 Sequestration $/m 2 NPV ($Million) Break-even Year Baseline 51.28 17.72 25.31 8.25 26.3 15 100% Cull mortality 43.46 12.32 25.31 5.83 20.1 18 Shell degradation = 0.9 46.60 14.41 25.31 6.88 21.1 17 Shell degradation = 0.5 56.69 21.50 25.31 9.88 32.5 13 Nitrogen price/lb = $0 18.40 18.40 0 0-10.8 - Nitrogen price/lb = $4 31.83 18.24 10.12 3.46 4.4 34 Nitrogen price/lb = $20 83.97 17.35 50.62 16.00 63.3 8 Harvest cost = $9 42.35 9.50 25.31 7.54 16.3 20 Harvest cost = $3 72.27 37.92 25.31 9.05 50.1 10 Oyster price = $12.15 61.48 27.39 25.31 8.77 37.9 12 Oyster price = $8.55 42.98 9.89 25.31 7.79 17.0 19 Discount rate = 0.03 71.27 24.63 35.35 10.69 58.5 12 Discount rate = 0.07 39.66 13.60 19.29 6.77 8.2 22 Discount rate = 0.118 25.95 8.62 12.64 4.69-12.1 - Natural Mortality = 0.2 87.49 44.42 25.31 17.76 67.3 8 Natural Mortality = 0.6 26.07 0.60 25.30 0.17-2.1 - Carrying Capacity = 0.1 9.23 3.67 7.79-2.23-21.1 - Intrinsic growth = 0.7 16.76 0 18.58-1.83-12.7 - Intrinsic growth = 1.3 84.76 41.23 25.31 18.22 64.2 9 Sediment deposition = 0.08 17.83 6.43 9.93 1.47-11.4 - Sediment Decay Rate = 0.04 52.80 18.64 25.31 8.86 28.1 15 Burial Scaling factor = 30 60.60 24.25 25.31 11.05 36.9 12 Burial Scaling factor = 10 22.78 0 23.87-1.09-5.9 - No harvest 27.56 0 25.31 2.25-0.05 -

Comparison with Jordan-Cooley et al. State Variables 0.25 Live Oysters Dead Oyster Sediment 0.2 Volume (m 3 ) 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Year

Approximation Collocation Policy iteration (Newton s method) Linear spline approximation for state space Oyster population = 90 nodes Reef growth = 7 nodes Siltation = 4 nodes Tolerance set to square root of machine precision ~1.49e-8

Value function residual 6 4 x 10-5 2 0 residual -2-4 -6 0-8 0.1 yster Stock 0.2-0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Reef Height

Present value 0.14 0.12 0.1 0.08 Value 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 1 0.5 Reef Height 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 Oyster Stock

Nutrient trading

Schulte et al. (2009) 29.89 acres of reef restored to high relief (HRR) in 2004 (25 45 cm) Less than 2 oysters m -2 density pre-restoration Persistent 1000 oysters m -2 density on HRR after restoration (sampled in 2007 & 2009)

Oyster nutrient credits Shellfish Aquaculture: Ecosystem Effects, Benthic Pelagic Coupling and Potential for Nutrient Trading Roger I. E. Newell Roger Mann A Report Prepared for the Secretary of Natural Resources, Commonwealth of Virginia. June 21, 2012

Crassostrea virginica: Denitrification and Nitrogen Sequestration Newell et al. (2005) Kellogg et al. (2013) STAC (2013)