The Coca-Cola Company s Carbon Accounting Manual. Operational Boundary

Similar documents
Corporate Emissions Assessment Protocol

OUR 2011 CARBON FOOTPRINT

Independent Accountants Report

Report of Independent Accountants

Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and Reporting Standard

Terrie Boguski Harmony Environmental, LLC Kansas State University. January 2010

Independent Accountants Review Report

Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory

Metric Description Metric Quantity Fiscal 2015 Total Energy Consumed (kwh) 7,299,965

Overview of GHG Inventory Management & Reporting. Alex Carr, Director of Special Projects Ryan Cassutt, Program Associate

Report of Independent Accountants

CR Reporting Criteria Annual Report 2017

Guidance on mandatory reporting requirements for quoted companies

Environmental Impacts. ,ċ Ĉą +*/1),0%+* ƫ *2!*0+.5ƫƫ,ċƫĈĈ +),(% *!

Greenhouse Gas. Emissions Report. December 2011

CLIMATE LEADERS. Corporate Climate Change Strategy: Ensuring a High Quality GHG Inventory. Workshop on a Climate Neutral UN September 8, 2008

Carbon footprint report 2013

International Standard for Determining Greenhouse Gas Emissions for Cities

Operational Excellence

Corporate Responsibility Reporting Criteria 2018 Annual Report

Reporting GHG Emissions

Myths or Distractions Is the Global Climate Changing? g Does Man play a significant part in Global Warming? Are CO2 emissions the proper measuring sti

Report of Independent Accountants

Fonterra Sustainability Report Environmental Data Reporting Notes

Introduction to Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory. A Municipal perspective. Magash Naidoo & Linda Somazembe 21/08/2015

Emission Inventory Report. For the period 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007

Carbon accounting report 2017

Guidance for Voluntary Corporate Greenhouse Gas Reporting Using Data and Methods from the 2013 Calendar Year

GHG EMISSIONS INVENTORY AT USU

Cover design to be confirmed from the ARA design. Investing for a better future. Definitions for our Key Performance Indicators

SSE s criteria used for GHG emissions reporting

BDO LLP Carbon Footprint Report 2016/17

Amer Sports Carbon Footprint 2015

Florida State Government Carbon Footprint July 1, 2006 through June 30, 2007

Liberty Global s Environmental Reporting Criteria 2017

Scope 3 GHG Inventory Report

OVERVIEW OF THE IPCC GUIDELINES

Carbon accounting report 2016

Appendix A SSE s criteria used for GHG emissions reporting

CARBON ACCOUNTING REPORT ATEA ASA

Britvic Sustainability Metrics: Basis of Reporting 2017

GHG INVENTORY BICBANCO 2014

E.ON UK PLC CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY REPORTING GUIDANCE

Seventh Biennial Report on Progress toward Greenhouse Gas Reduction Goals

Clark University on Track for Carbon Reduction and Carbon Neutrality Goals

SEGRO Methodology for Greenhouse Gas Reporting

Lithuania s Initial Report under the Kyoto Protocol. Calculation of Assigned Amount under Article 7, paragraph 4, of the Kyoto Protocol

Setting. operational boundaries

International Local Government GHG Emissions Analysis Protocol (IEAP) Version 1.0 (October 2009)

Regional Environmental Performance Summary

Solstad Offshore ASA. Carbon accounting report 2012

Carbon accounting report 2015

Part 3 Direct GHG from Cement Manufacturing Calculation of Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Inventory for Indonesia Cement Industries

Guidelines for Quantifying GHG emission. reductions of goods or services through Global. Value Chain

10. GREENHOUSE GASES EAST-WEST TIE TRANSMISSION PROJECT AMENDED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report

Carbon accounting manual

Greenhouse Gas Protocol (Dual Reporting) Report for Kinnevik. Assessment Period: Produced on Feb. 13, 2018 by Our Impacts on behalf of U&W

U.S. Emissions

Energy and GHG-emissions

Scope 3 GHG Inventory Report

Carbon footprint report 2016

Clark University Greenhouse Gas Emissions Update: Clark University on Track for Carbon Reduction and Carbon Neutrality Goals.

GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING: Fiscal Year 2014

GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING: Fiscal Year 2013

Carbon accounting report 2018

Area-wide Emissions. Briefing Note 1: Introduction to Greenhouse Gas Estimation May In partnership with

Carbon management: organisational boundaries. Guidance for public sector organisations

BASF Scope 3 GHG Inventory Report

Deloitte Belgium 2017 Impact Report FY2017 Basis of reporting

Comparative Analysis of Local GHG Inventory Tools for Cities. World Bank 13 November 2009

CARBON ACCOUNTING REPORT ATEA ASA

Carbon accounting report 2015

City of Tacoma Community and Municipal Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory

Xcel Energy Inc. - Climate Change 2018

Table TSD-A.1 Source categories included under Section 202 Section 202 Source IPCC Sector IPCC Source Category Greenhouse Gases

Non-State and Subnational Action Guidance

ORGANISATIONAL GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS (CARBON FOOTPRINT) DISCLOSURE

Category 8: Upstream Leased Assets

Greenhouse Gas Protocol Accounting Notes No. 1

Energy Savings Analysis for County Greenhouse Gas Inventory

Carbon Reporting & Footprinting. Jean Lowes

Clark University Greenhouse Gas Emissions Update: Clark University on Track for Emissions and Carbon Neutrality Goals.

Introduction to Greenhouse Gas Accounting

Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Report

Honda Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Common Calculation Standard for N.A. Suppliers (Product Lifecycle Viewpoint Version)

KPI METHODOLOGY DOCUMENT

GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING Fiscal Year 2015

Reporting Methodology Swire Pacific Annual Report 2017

Introduction to the GPC

Scope 3 Emissions Reporting for Tertiary Education. Chris Wilson, Pangolin Associates Carmen Primo, University of Tasmania

Environment & community metrics A detailed view

PARK CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION 1990 & 2007 CARBON INVENTORY BASELINE ASSESSMENT

Carbon accounting report 2016

Carbon Accounting at Kaiser Permanente

CLIMATE ACTON PLANNING & MITIGATION: Base Year 2016 Greenhouse Gas Inventory Results

Carbon Neutral Program Public Disclosure Summary

8. Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Flexibility in the Direct Store Delivery Supply Chain

Transcription:

The Coca-Cola Company s Carbon Accounting Manual Operational Boundary The Coca-Cola global business system is composed of The Coca-Cola Company (TCCC) and nearly 275 bottling partners. TCCC manufactures and sells concentrates, beverage bases and syrups to bottling operations, owns the brands and is responsible for consumer brand marketing initiatives. The bottling partners manufacture, package, merchandise and distribute the final beverages to customers and/or consumers. TCCC and its bottling partners together are collectively known as The Coca-Cola System (TCCS), or simply System. TCCC does not own, manage, or control most local bottling companies. Although the System is not a single entity from a legal or managerial perspective, TCCC strives to positively influence environmental activities and policies throughout the bottling system and to become more transparent by reporting information from both Companyowned operations and the broader System. Contract manufactures are also used to manufacture and distribute Coca-Cola brands. Although environmental data is not typically tracked for non-strategic co-packers, emissions from their activities are estimated based on regional average emissions intensities (grams CO 2 per liter produced/delivered) and sales volume. While co-packers may manufacture products that are unaffiliated with TCCC in their plants, only the environmental impacts associated with TCCC and its brands are accounted for in the GHG inventory. TCCC implements a greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions inventory calculation methodology that is based on the Greenhouse Gas Protocol s Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard - Revised Addition, March 2004 (GHG Protocol) and the Beverage Industry Environmental Roundtable s Beverage Industry Sector Guidance for Greenhouse Gas Reporting, January 2013 (BIER Guidance). For the purposes of reporting in adherence with the GHG Protocol, TCCC has selected an organizational boundary where it has operational control. The company uses this method to distinguish Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions for TCCC and Scope 3 emissions resulting from bottling partner operations. From this perspective, direct and indirect emissions are included in TCCC Scope 1 and 2 emissions from bottling operations that are companyowned subsidiaries such as Coca-Cola Refreshments (CCR) and Bottling Investment Group (BIG). From time to time, TCCC will acquire or take control of bottling or canning operations, or make equity investments representing non-controlling interests in selected bottling operations, in order to leverage its resources and expertise to improve performance. The operational boundary method was chosen to simplify environmental performance reporting, limiting the scope to operations where TCCC has the full authority to introduce and implement its operating policies. However, the GHG inventory also accounts for the entire System, including companies where TCCC does not have operational control. Some audiences prefer this more comprehensive disclosure, which enables more effective System-wide reduction opportunities to be identified and increases transparency of System-wide emissions tracking. Emissions Boundary In accordance with the GHG Protocol, TCCC reports emissions for relevant Kyoto Protocol gases if material. According to the GHG Protocol, information is considered to be material if, by its inclusion or exclusion, it can be seen to influence any decisions or actions taken by users of it. TCCC has set a materiality threshold of five percent of the sum of Scope 1, 2

and 3 emissions. However, certain emissions that are less than this materiality threshold are estimated and included in the inventory to satisfy stakeholder expectations, such as business travel. It should be noted, however, that in accordance with our policies and procedures, newly acquired facilities have up to 2 years to begin reporting its data through the TCCC tracking tool. TCCC is not aware of any sources of perfluorocarbon (PFC) or sulphur hexafluoride (SF 6 ) emissions within its operational control and does not include these in the inventory. Scope 1 consists of direct emissions from fuel combustion at company-owned stationary and mobile sources encompassing manufacturing facilities, distribution vehicles and corporate aircraft and emissions from company-owned cold drink equipment. Scope 2 consists of indirect emissions from purchased energy at companyowned/controlled manufacturing facilities. Emissions from independent bottling partner activities are recorded as Scope 3 emissions. TCCC also computes Scope 3 emissions associated with key segments of its value chain. For example, consumption of key ingredients (e.g. sugarcane) or packaging materials (e.g., PET resin) are multiplied by GHG intensity factors (from secondary and primary sources) to estimate GHG emissions from Purchased Goods. Only CO2 emissions are calculated for most streams Table 1: TCCC Emissions Method, Factors and Exclusions Scope 1 (Manufacturing) Methodology Emissions Factors Exclusions Manufacturing emissions from direct operations arise from TCCC-owned/controlled activities that emit GHGs from the combustion of fuels. TCCC currently tracks the following fuels: light fuel oil (LFO, diesel, distillate fuel oil), heavy fuel oil (HFO, residual fuel oil), kerosene, propane (LPG), natural gas, coal, landfill gas, biofuels, biomass, wastewater treatment plant gas, and other fuel sources specified by the facility. Change Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (2006) - Stationary fuel consumption at warehouses and offices - CO 2 loss during production - AC/Chiller emissions

Scope 1 (Fleet) Fleet emissions from direct operations result from the combustion of fuels in company-owned and company leased distribution vehicles. Fuel use by the distribution fleet is determined from purchasing data collected. Fleet fuel data is collected by fuel type and then converted into diesel equivalents, from which emissions are calculated. Where data is unavailable or incomplete, average emissions intensities (grams CO2 per liter produced/delivered) and sales volume for the organizational unit are used to extrapolate emissions for the distribution fleets. Appendix H of the instructions to Form EIA-1605, United States Energy Information Administration (2011) Scope 1 (Refrigeration) TCCC recognizes a default refrigerant annual loss rate of 1.5 percent of charge. TCCS cold drink equipment (coolers, vending machines and fountain dispensers) throughout its sales territories range from Countertop, 1 Door (100-300L), 1 Door (>300L), 2 Doors, 3 Doors, 4 Doors, Chest (Reach In), Open (Air Curtain), Open Top, and Specialty. Refrigerants include CFC, HFC, HCFC, CO2, R- 600a, and R-290. The size of vending machines can vary from a 0-300 can machine, 300-500 cans, 500+ cans, and others. The cold drink equipment inventory is estimated through internal processes administered by Corporate departments including Commercial Leadership, Marketing and Finance. These data represents the top 32 markets which includes TCCC-owned cold drink equipment as part of the inventory included in the scope 1 refrigerants calculation, which is then extrapolated to account for the entire System. Beverage Industry Environmental Roundtable s Beverage Industry Sector Guidance for Greenhouse Gas Reporting, December 2010 Change, 2007, "Fourth Assessment Report" (global warming potential 100 years)

Scope 1 (Corporate Aircraft) Corporate aircraft data are collected quarterly in the Professional Flight Management (PFM) system as TCCC employees schedule corporate aviation flights. Corporate aircraft emissions are calculated using the amount of fuel use and relevant emissions factors. Change, 1999, Aviation and the Global Atmosphere (chapter 7 section 8.1. Databases on fuel properties) Scope 2 (Manufacturing) Scope 3 (Manufacturing) Records for purchased electricity, steam, and - heating/cooling (hot water/chilled water) are used to calculate GHG emissions for Scope 2. The majority of these emissions are associated with electricity purchases. TCCC collects electricity, hot water and- steam consumption data directly from utility bills or utility meters on a quarterly basis. Heat and steam emissions are adjusted for the type of generation (heat/steam only or cogeneration) and heat loss during transmission. Emissions of CO 2 are calculated from this energy consumption data within SDW using emission factors. Manufacturing emissions from indirect operations arise from activities that emit GHGs from the combustion of fuels at bottling partner facilities. The methodology for calculating emissions from this source is identical to "Scope 1 and 2 : Manufacturing" above CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion (2014 Edition), 2012 factors, International Energy Agency Data Services (country-specific electricity + heat factors) Change Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (2006 (fuel type for hot water or steam generation) - Indirect emissions from warehouses and offices - Stationary fuel consumption and indirect emissions from warehouses and offices - CO 2 loss during production - AC/Chiller emissions

Scope 3 (Fleet) Fleet emissions from indirect operations result from the combustion of fuels in distribution vehicles not owned by the company. The methodology for calculating emissions from this source is identical to "Scope 1: Fleet" above Appendix H of the instructions to Form EIA-1605, United States Energy Information Administration (2011) Scope 3 (Business Travel) Business travel emissions are calculated from corporate travel based on air miles flown. Miles are estimated from travel agency records and emissions factors are averaged across flight classes. The relevant travel agencies provide the records to a third-party data aggregator that provides the total air miles flown to TCCC. Business Travel emissions are reported based on information provided by our primary global travel agents to a third party data aggregator. Travel booked outside of our primary agents (i.e. booked using websites or local travel agents) are not included. TCCC determines this to be immaterial to overall business travel emissions. TCCC calculates emissions from business travel using a factor of 0.00027 tonnes of CO2 per mile flown, which is based on an average emission factor from the WRI Mobile Combustion GHG Emissions Calculation Tool V. 2.0 (2009). The emissions factors from the WRI tool originate from Department for Environment Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA) - Ground transportation - Travel booked outside of the primary global travel agency partnerships Exclusions In the interest of completeness and transparency, TCCC has been working to capture all of its GHG emissions. TCCC continues to improve the identification and collection of data within its organizational and operational boundaries. Because of the size and complexity of TCCS, it is not always possible to obtain all of the necessary information to complete all segments of the inventory. When information cannot be obtained in a timely manner, TCCC uses extrapolations to provide the most complete inventory possible. As data becomes available identifying additional material sources of emissions, they will be incorporated into the inventory. Certain emissions sources are currently excluded from the annual inventory (Table 1). Direct and indirect energy use at warehouses and offices, CO 2 loss during production and have not been evaluated by TCCC at this time. Emissions from these sources will be disclosed in the future if determined to be material. Calculation Methodology: Approach and Major Assumptions TCCC has identified individuals that are responsible for the collection of operational data used to calculate emissions. These individuals are required by the Company s Environment, Occupational Safety and Health Performance Measurement (EOSHPM) Requirements to submit energy and other performance measurement data via a collection system known as the Stewardship Data Warehouse (SDW). The submittals may be at the facility, business unit, or corporate level. The standard reporting procedure for energy and

other EOSHPM data is quarterly, but frequency of reporting can vary based upon the business needs of each facility. Information for business travel, refrigerants and corporate aircraft is consolidated outside of SDW. Non-financial information is subject to measurement uncertainties resulting from limitations inherent in the nature and the methods used for determining such data. The selection of different but acceptable measurement techniques can result in materially different measurements. The precision of different measurement techniques may also vary. When TCCC is unable to collect activity data associated with the complete sales volume, it uses an extrapolation methodology to estimate emissions. The extrapolation methodology is based on emissions intensities of the reported activity data and the sales volume for each organizational unit. The intensity factors are only used to estimate the emissions associated with the difference between sales volume and the production volume for reported environmental and fleet performance data. Before finalizing the annual emissions inventory, internal controls include a plausibility review to identify and prevent any identified inaccuracies. Plausibility review is relevant only for source streams captured within SDW. Plausibility review is built into SDW and flags inconsistencies during data entry. At the end of each year, a manual review is conducted to correct plausibility issues. Selected quantitative data is then subjected to Independent 3rd Party Assurance.