Farm A Syst. Animal Waste Storage and Management PENNSYLVANIA WORKSHEET 9 WHY BE CONCERNED?

Similar documents
Worksheet #7 Assessing the Risk of Groundwater Contamination from Livestock Waste Storage

Worksheet #8 Assessing the Risk of Groundwater Contamination from Livestock Yards Management

FARM A SYST Farmstead Assessment System

Farm A Syst. Milkhouse Waste Management PENNSYLVANIA WORKSHEET 5 WHY BE CONCERNED?

Farm A Syst. Milkhouse Waste Management P E N N S Y L V A N I A. WorkSheet 5 FARM EVALUATION SYSTEM

Worksheet #1 Assessing the Risk of Groundwater Contamination from Drinking Water Well Condition

Farm A Syst. Soil Conservation Management PENNSYLVANIA WORKSHEET 11

Worksheet #3 Assessing the Risk of Groundwater Contamination from Fertilizer Storage and Handling

Fact Sheet #7 Reducing the Risk of Groundwater Contamination by Improving Livestock Waste Storage

Work Sheet #6 Assessing the Risk of Groundwater Contamination from Household Wastewater Treatment

LANDOWNER S SURVEY: WHAT S THE RISK TO YOUR WATER

Background. AEM Tier 2 Worksheet Farmstead Water Supply Evaluation. AEM Principle: Glossary

Worksheet #4 Assessing the Risk of Groundwater Contamination from Petroleum Product Storage

Why should you be concerned?

Assessing Your Livestock Manure Storage Glenn E. Conatser, Professor and Leader Animal Science Swine

Assessing and Reducing the Risk of Groundwater Contamination from SILAGE STORAGE

Agricultural and Biological Engineering. Biological Manipulation of Manure: Getting What You Want from Animal Manure

Reducing the Risk of Ground Water Contamination by Improving Livestock Holding Pen Management

Controlling runon and runoff:

Individual Residential Spray Irrigation Systems (IRSIS)

Land Application of Manure

Manure Storage for Environmental Management Systems

FARM A SYST Farmstead Assessment System

Virginia Farmstead Assessment System

HOW TO MANAGE A LIVESTOCK YARD

Streamlines V2, n2 (May 1997) A Newsletter for North Carolina Water Supply Watershed Administrators

Septic Tank Soil Treatment Systems

Manure Management Manual Revisions

storage There are three basic systems for storing liquid SYSTEM DESCRIPTIONS

Nutrient Management Legislation in Pennsylvania:

EC Farm*A*Syst Nebraska s System for Assessing Water Contamination Risk Worksheet 2: Site Evaluation

Fact Sheet #3 Reducing the Risk of Groundwater Contamination by Improving Fertilizer Storage and Handling

Publication No. 26: Private Drinking Water Wells Types of Construction

VIRGINIA POLLUTION ABATEMENT (VPA) PERMIT APPLICATION. FORM B - ANIMAL FEEDING OPERATIONS (AFOs)

11.0 HANDLING AND STORING AGRICULTURAL INPUTS

South Fish Creek Watershed Animal Waste Storage and Management

Milking Center Wastewater: Planning, Design, Construction, Documentation

MINIMIZING THE RISK OF MANURE RUNOFF THIS FALL/WINTER. Nichole Embertson, Ph.D. Whatcom Conservation District

Some people get most of their water from their own

Non-point source pollution now accounts for over 75% of Pennsylvania s total water pollution

Improving Livestock Manure Storage

WASTE TREATMENT LAGOON

Reducing the Risk of Surface and Ground Water Contamination by Improving Livestock Manure Storage & Utilization

Background Information & Mitigation Guidelines MANURE STORAGE IMPROVEMENTS and MORTALITY MANAGEMENT

Upslope from or at grade with pollution sources. No surface water runoff reaches wellhead.

Section 1 - General Information (All farms must complete this section)

Erosion and Sediment Pollution Control Guidelines for Residential Lots with soil disturbance of less than 1 acre (see exceptions)

Onsite Sewage Treatment Program. Presented by: Ed Melzark SR Environmental Technician / Zoning Administrator Pine County

CHAPTER # 4. Fate of Pollutants in the Environment

Protecting Water Supply Springs

Reducing the Risk of Ground Water Contamination by Improving Milking Center Wastewater Treatment

DRIP EMITTER SYSTEM STUDY GUIDE

Source Water Protection Practices Bulletin Managing Turfgrass and Garden Fertilizer Application to Prevent Contamination of Drinking Water

Source Water Assessment Program (SWAP) Report for Heath Elementary School

The Water We Drink. Why is drinking water important to you? How much drinking water do we have? Where We Find the Earth's Water

Contractors, Illicit Discharges, & Best Management Practices. Chris Allen Stormwater Inspector

Wellhead Management Background. Well Location. 6) Water testing 7) New wells 8) Unused and abandoned wells

POND CONSTRUCTION. Woodland Steward Series

Water Pollution. Objective: Name, describe, and cite examples of the eight major types of water pollution.

Manaqement of Animal Production Wastes

Septic Systems. A Complete Guide To Understanding How They Work and How To Keep Them Healthy

SYST LIVESTOCK A FOR MICHIGAN PRODUCERS. FAS 112 October 2017 Major Revision Destroy Old (517)

Wisconsin s Improving Nutrient Management WI Dept. of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection

Fact Sheet #6 Reducing the Risk of Groundwater Contamination by Improving Household Wastewater Treatment

Worksheet #5 Assessing the Risk of Groundwater Contamination from Hazardous Waste Management

Shelbyville, Kentucky Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) Stormwater Pollution Treatment Practices (Structural) DRAFT

LPES Small Farms Fact Sheets* Small-Scale Farmers and the Environment: How to be a Good Steward. By Mark Rice, North Carolina State University

Food Safety Begins on the Farm: A Grower Self Assessment of Food Safety Risks. Herd Health HERD HEALTH

E & S Plan Approved. Not required but may be a municipal requirement** Not required but may be a. municipal. requirement** Not required but may be a

POND SEALING OR LINING COMPACTED SOIL TREATMENT

Small-Scale Farmers and the Environment: How to be a Good Steward

Assessing Your Dead Animal Management Practices

4. Ponds and infiltration BMPs can achieve 60 to 100% removal efficiencies for sediment.

The Early-Season Chlorophyll Meter Test for Corn

Suggested Best Management Practices (BMPs)

P1869 Managing Household Wastewater

The following amendments to Farm*A*Syst (FAS 107) being proposed by the subcommittee were/are presented to the Advisory Council on these dates:

BUREAU OF WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PROGRAM GUIDANCE. Feed Storage Area Runoff Controls for CAFOs X/X/2016. EGAD Number: 3800-XXXX-XX

VIRGINIA POLLUTION ABATEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION

Hydrology and Water Quality. Water. Water 9/13/2016. Molecular Water a great solvent. Molecular Water

extension.missouri.edu

Hydrology and Water Quality. Water. Water 9/11/2018. Molecular Water a great solvent. Molecular Water

State Regulations Fact Sheet - Wisconsin

Conservation Practices. Conservation Choices. These five icons will show the benefits each practice offers... 6/4/2014

Fertilizer Storage and Handling

Reservoir age, increasing human population,

How Climate Change Impacts Urban Runoff and Water Quality Design

Whole-farm Nutrient Balance. Farm Site Review

Review/print this Iowa Farm*A*Syst unit Water Well Condition & maintenance Water Well Condition & maintenance

Erosion and Sedimentation Pollution Control (ESPC) Plan Narrative

CHAPTER 91. GENERAL PROVISIONS ****

EARTHEN MANURE STORAGE STRUCTURES

Wastewater Management

ORDINANCE NO. 33 (2000) MANURE MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE

Suggested Stormwater Management Practices For Individual House Lots

August 14September 27, 2013

Chapter 63 Animal Manure and Nutrient Management Page 1 of 20

Agronomy Facts 40 Nutrient Management Legislation in Pennsylvania: A Summary of the 2006 Regulations

Standards for Soil Erosion and Sediment Control in New Jersey May 2012 STANDARD FOR GRASSED WATERWAYS. Definition. Purpose

Chapter 6 Sand Filtration Treatment Facilities

Transcription:

PENNSYLVANIA Farm A Syst F ARM EVALUATION SYSTEM WORKSHEET 9 Animal Waste Storage and Management WHY BE CONCERNED? Runoff from livestock production facilities can carry manure, soil, microorganisms, and other potential pollutants that could contaminate surface water and groundwater sources. If not managed properly, animal wastes can affect water quality and human health. Stored animal waste can be land applied when conditions are right for nutrient use by crops. Accumulating manure in a concentrated area, however, can be risky to the environment and to human and animal health. Storing animal waste properly can be quite technically involved and is often subject to regulations regarding design, location, maintenance, and monitoring of facilities especially for operations with large numbers of animals. Structures for liquid or semi-solid animal waste can leak or rupture. Animal waste in earthen ponds can form a semi-impervious seal of organic matter that limits leaching potential, but seasonal filling and emptying can cause the seal to break down. Temporary abandoned and animal waste storage areas can also be sources of runoff to surface water or groundwater contamination by nitrates. Animal waste or animal waste runoff that enters surface water supplies algae and aquatic plants with nutrients. When this increased plant material begins to die and decay, the dissolved oxygen level in the water often declines. If the dissolved oxygen levels become too low, fish kills occur. Some algae reproduce quickly when stimulated by enriched nutrient conditions, creating toxic algal blooms that can kill humans and animals. Nitrogen from animal waste can also be a source of nitrates in groundwater. Nitrate levels above the federal and state drinking water standard of 10 milligrams per liter (mg/l; equivalent to parts per million for water measure) can pose health problems for infants under 6 months of age. This condition in infants is often described as methemoglobinemia (blue baby syndrome). Nitrates can also affect adults, but the evidence is uncertain. In addition, young livestock are susceptible to health problems from high nitrate-nitrogen levels in water, especially in combination with drought-stressed and other feed sources that are potentially high in nitrate-nitrogen. Fecal and coliform bacteria and other pathogens in animal waste can contaminate surface and groundwater when the waste is improperly handled, causing such infectious diseases as dysentery, typhoid, and infectious hepatitis (Hepatitis A). Typical water purification practices such as chlorination are not effective in controlling some of the pathogens found in animal waste. Organic materials causing an undesirable taste and odor in drinking water are not known to be dangerous to health, but their presence suggests that other contaminants may be in the drinking water. Management of dead animals may also affect water quality. Improper management may introduce bacteria or nitrates into groundwater or surface water. Everyone working around animal waste reception, transfer, and storage facilities should be aware of safe operating procedures for their system. Decomposing animal waste can produce toxic emissions that accumulate in low or enclosed places. Liquid or semi-solid animal waste may appear solid, but will not support a person s weight. Farm workers should also know how to respond in the case of emergencies related to malfunctioning storage facilities. The goal of Pennsylvania Farm A Syst is to help you protect groundwater and surface water, shared resources which are important to everyone. HOW TO RANK GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER PROTECTION USING THIS WORKSHEET You can select from a wide range of animal waste storage conditions and practices that are related to potential groundwater or surface water contamination. You can rank your animal waste storage practices according to how they might affect groundwater or surface water. Based on your overall ratings, you can determine which of your conditions or practices are reasonably safe and effective, and which might require modification to better protect groundwater and surface water. Information derived from Farm A Syst worksheets is intended only to provide general information and recommendations to farmers regarding their own farmstead practices. It is not the intent of this educational program to keep records of individual results. However, they may be shared with others who will help you develop a resource management plan. HOW TO COMPLETE THE WORKSHEET Follow the directions as listed on page 1 of the worksheet. The evaluation should take 15 30 minutes to complete and determine your ranking. Evaluate each site that is part of your farmstead. There are spaces provided to rank up to three sites on your farmstead. If you have more than three sites, please use another worksheet. If you are unfamiliar with any of the terms used, refer to the glossary provided with this worksheet. Pennsylvania Farm A Syst is a cooperative effort among Penn State Cooperative Extension, Pennsylvania Association of Conservation Districts, Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture, Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, and USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service.

WORKSHEET #9: ANIMAL WASTE STORAGE AND MANAGEMENT Use a pencil in case you want to change an answer later. For each feature listed on the left that is appropriate for your farmstead, read across to the right and circle the statement that most closely describes conditions on your farmstead. Leave blank any features that don t apply to your farmstead. Find the corresponding rank number (4, 3, 2, 1) for each description you circled and enter that number in the blank under RANK. If the conditions in any one description do not match your situation exactly, use an in-between score of one-half unit; for example, 2.5 or 3.5. Directions for overall scoring appear at the end of the worksheet. Allow 15 to 30 minutes to complete the worksheet and to determine the level of groundwater and surface water protection that you are providing. MANAGEMENT OR SITE CONDITIONS 4 3 2 1 RANK WASTE STORAGE FACILITY #1 #2 #3 1. Waste storage Designed and installed Not designed to Not designed to structure according to accepted engineering standards, engineering standards, engineering standards or design criteria un- or design criteria unand specifications.* known. No sign of leaks, known. Signs of leaks, Properly maintained. # cracks, or structural cracks, or structural problems. Water table problems. Water table or. or fractured bedrock fractured bedrock deeper than 2 feet. shallower than 2 feet. 2. Earthen waste Designed and installed Not designed to Not designed to storage pond according to accepted engineering standards, engineering standards. engineering standards or design criteria un- Constructed in coarseand specifications.** known. Constructed in textured materials (sands, Properly maintained. # medium- or fine-textured sandy loam), subject to dense materials (silt overtopping, or enclosing loam, loam, clay loam, embankment is unstable. silty clay). Excessive Excessive vegetation, vegetations, trees, etc., trees, etc., on embankon embankment. Water ment. Fractured bedrock table or fractured or water table shallower bedrock deeper than 2 than 2 feet below pond feet below pond bottom. bottom. More than 10 years Earthen, concrete, or old. Earthen, concrete, or geosynthetic lining. geosynthetic lining eroded, perforated, or nonexistent. * Animal waste storage conforms to the requirements of the current Pennsylvania Technical Guide, Section IV, standard 313 and specification 313S, Natural Resource Conservation Service, Harrisburg, PA. ** Animal waste storage conforms to the requirements of the current Pennsylvania Technical Guide, Section IV, standard 313 and specification 313P, Natural Resource Conservation Service, Harrisburg, PA. # The operator of the animal waste storage facilities monitors and maintains them according to the site-specific operation and maintenance plan that meets the requirements of the current Pennsylvania Technical Guide, Section IV, standard 313, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Harrisburg, PA.

4 3 2 1 RANK WASTE STORAGE FACILITY (continued) #1 #2 #3 3. Stacked in Paved with curbs, clean Paved with curbs. Run- Stabilized earthen Earthen surface with livestock yard or water diverted, and run- off directed to grass surface with medium- coarse-textured soils on stacking pad off collected in liquid- filter area. Designed and or fine-textured soils (sands, sandy loam). tight animal waste installed according to (silt, loam, clay loam, Water table or fractured storage. Designed and accepted engineering silty clay). Water table or bedrock shallower than installed according to standards and fractured bedrock deeper 2 feet. No runoff controls accepted engineering specifications.* than 2 feet. More than or curbing. Less than 200 standards and Properly maintained. # 200 feet from stream, feet from stream, pond, specifications.* Properly pond, or lake. or lake. maintained. # 4. Stacked under Paved floor. Protected Earthen or concrete Earthen floor on Earthen floor on coarseroof from surface water floor on medium- or medium- or fine-textured textured soils (sands, runoff. Adequate fine-textured soils (silt soils (silt loam, loam, clay sandy loam), subject to bedding provided. loam, loam, clay loam, loam, silty clay), subject surface runoff. Water Properly maintained. silty clay), protected to surface water runoff. table or fractured bedfrom surface water Water table or fractured rock shallower than runoff. Water table or bedrock shallower than 2 feet. fractured bedrock 2 feet. deeper than 2 feet. 5. Temporary Solid waste. Earthen Earthen surface on Earthen surface on in-field stacking surface on moderately medium- or fine- coarse-textured soils well- or well-drained, textured soils (silt loam, (sands, sandy loam), medium- or fine-textured loam, clay loam, silty subject to surface water soils (silt loam, loam, clay), subject to surface runoff. Water table or clay loam, silty clay), water runoff. Water table fractured bedrock protected from surface or fractured bedrock shallower than water runoff. Water table shallower than 2 feet. 2 feet. or fractured bedrock deeper than 2 feet. * Livestock yard conforms to the requirements of the current Pennsylvania Technical Guide, Section IV, Standards 357 (Barnyard Runoff Control) and 561 (Heavy Use Area Protection) and stacking area conforms to the requirements of the current Pennsylvania Technical Guide, Section IV, Standards 317A (Waste Stacking and Handling Pad), Natural Resource Conservation Service, Harrisburg, PA. # The operator of the animal waste storage facilities monitors and maintains them according to the requirements of the current Pennsylvania Technical Guide, Section IV, Standard 357 or 317A, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Harrisburg, PA. 4 3 2 1 RANK LOCATION #1 #2 #3 6. Location of Down or across slope Upslope more than Less than 100 feet if animal waste more than 100 feet if 100 feet if less than less than 1.5 million storage in relation less than 1.5 million 1.5 million gallons; gallons; less than 200 to drinking water gallons; more than 200 more than 200 feet if feet if greater than 1.5 well or surface feet if greater than 1.5 greater than 1.5 million million gallons or has a water million gallons or has a gallons or has a slope slope greater than 8%. slope greater than 8%. + greater than 8%.

4 3 2 1 RANK LOCATION (CONTINUED) #1 #2 #3 7. Location of Not within floodplain. Consistent with local Local ordinances not animal waste ordinances. # Sides consulted. Subject to storage on protected from erosion erosion, scouring, overfloodplains and scouring by 25- topping, or uplift pressures year flood. from a 25-year flood. + Location complies with Pennsylvania Code Title 25, Chapter 105, Appendix I.105-249, unless other state or federal laws or regulations require a greater distance for public water sources. # Under Pennsylvania Flood Plain Management Act 32, Subsection 679.101-601. STORAGE CAPACITY AND MANAGEMENT #1 #2 #3 8. Storage Adequate capacity to Adequate capacity to Volume is inadequate capacity meet nutrient manage- meet nutrient manage- for application based on ment plan for growing ment plan for spring and crop needs and efficient season application. fall application. nutrient use. Frequent applications when crops are not growing. 9. Storage status When full, capacity to When full, capacity to Occasionally less than Often less than 6 inches at time of unload- handle 25-year, 24-hour handle 25-year, 24-hour 6 inches freeboard for freeboard for structures ing (liquid, semi- storm event is still storm event is still structures and 1 foot and 1 foot for earthen solid manure) available, plus available or more than for earthen ponds ponds remain when more than 6 inches 6 inches freeboard for remain when full. full. freeboard for structures structures and 1 foot for and 1 foot for earthen earthen ponds remain ponds remain. (whichever is greater). 10. Reception and Designed and installed Not designed to Not designed to transfer system according to accepted engineering standards, engineering standards, engineering standards or design criteria un- or design criteria unand specifications. No known. No potential known. Signs of leaks, potential backflow backflow from storage. overflow, cracks, or from storage. No sign of leaks, cracks, structural problems. Properly maintained. or structural problems. 11. Water All clean runoff and Most clean runoff and No clean runoff or roof Water regularly runs diversion around roof water directed roof water directed water redirected before freely through the animal waste away from the away from storage it reaches the animal animal waste storage storage facilities storage area. facilities, or storage waste storage facility. facilities or causes designed to accom- Water may flow through loss of storage capacity modate the runoff the facility during or overtopping. volume. heavy storms. 12. Animal waste All animal waste Animal waste storage Animal waste storage Animal waste storage storage and storage and handling and handling facilities and handling facilities and handling facilities handling facilities facilities routinely (at occasionally (at least repaired only when generally ignored and inspections least once a month and once every six months signs of leaks, spills, or not observed for leaks, after storms) observed and after storms) ob- overflows are noticed. spills, or overflows. for leaks, spills, or served for leaks, spills, overflows. Repairs or overflows. Repairs made as needed. made as needed.

4 3 2 1 RANK SPILLS #1 #2 #3 13. Unloading Spills cleaned up Spills cleaned up Spills and loading area and handling immediately and within a few days. not cleaned. Liquid or disposed of properly. Liquid and semi-solid semi-solid storage out- Liquid or semi-solid storage outlets lets not protected by EMERGENCY storage outlets pro- protected by check check valves or shutoffs. tected by check valves valves or shutoffs. or shutoffs. #1 #2 #3 14. Emergency Site-specific Site-specific No plan for manure Action Plan contingency plan contingency plan leaks or spills. developed for leaks or developed for manure spills posted or readily leaks or spills, but not available in case of an readily available or emergency. + Adequate resources for equipment and supplies implementation not available for plan available. + implementation. + In accordance with the current Pennsylvania Technical Guide, Section IV, standard 313, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Harrisburg, PA. DEAD ANIMAL DISPOSAL #1 #2 #3 15. Dead animal Dead animals properly Dead animals disposed Dead animals disposed Dead animals allowed disposal disposed of within of by covering them with of by covering them with to decompose in the 48 hours by com- at least 3 inches of less than 24 inches of open. posting, + incineration, quick lime and 24 inches soil or placing them or pickup by rendering of soil. More than 100 less than 100 feet from company, where feet from well, spring, or a well or water source. available. surface water. Not sub- Subject to surface ject to overflow from runoff or water ponds or streams. Water table than 4 feet. table deeper than 4 feet.* + In accordance with the current Pennsylvania Technical Guide, Section IV, standard 318, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Harrisburg, PA. *Specified by the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture, Act No. 317, Sections 17 and 20. TOTAL Use this total to calculate overall performance ranking.

HOW TO USE THESE RANKINGS Step 1: Now that each feature has been ranked, add all these rankings together and put that value in the Total box at the end of the worksheet. Transfer that number to the box below. Step 2: Divide the value in the Total box by the number of features ranked. Step 3: Repeat for the remaining sites. Calculate the average ranking for all sites combined. divided by equals (total of rankings) (# of features ranked) (average ranking)* *carry your answer out to one decimal place Step 4: Evaluate the overall management practices and site conditions. 3.6 4.0 = best management 2.6 3.5 = good management 1.6 2.5 = fair management 1.0 1.5 = poor management This ranking gives an idea of how animal waste storage practices as a whole might affect water quality. This ranking should serve only as a very general guide, not a precise diagnosis. Since it represents an averaging of many individual rankings, it can mask any individual rankings (such as 1s and 2s) that should be of concern. Step 5: Look over the rankings for individual features of each site: Best (4s): the current ideal; should be the goal despite cost and effort Good (3s): provides reasonable surface water and groundwater protection Fair (2s): inadequate protection in many circumstances Poor (1s): poses a high risk of polluting surface water and/or groundwater and causing human or animal health problems Regardless of the overall ranking, any individual rankings of 1 should receive immediate attention. Some concerns can be taken care of right away; others could be major or costly projects, requiring planning and prioritizing before taking action. Step 6: Consider how to modify farmstead management practices or site conditions to better protect water quality. Contact your local conservation district, Cooperative Extension office, or the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service for ideas, suggestions, or guidance.

GLOSSARY Animal waste: A combination of manure, bedding, feed, dirt, and water. Cast-in-place concrete storage: A type of liquid-tight animal waste storage structure. Located on a concrete pad, it consists of poured concrete reinforced with steel. It may be located above ground or partially or totally in ground. Collection and transfer system: Small volume pits receiving animal waste directly from animals by gravity flow or scraping before it is moved through channels or pipes to the animal waste storage facility. Compost: Organic residues such as animal waste and animal mortalities that have been collected and allowed to decompose with aeration until they are stable. Composting: A controlled process of decomposing organic matter by microorganisms in aerobic conditions. The end product is usually used as a nutrient source or soil conditioner. Decompose: The aerobic (well-aerated) or anaerobic (poorly aerated) breakdown of organic materials primarily by microbial activity. Earthen storage pond: An in-ground animal waste storage facility constructed according to specific engineering standards. Not simply an excavation. Must be built in compacted clay soils or have a compacted clay, geotextile, or other impermeable liner in order to reduce the potential for leakage. Engineering standards: Planning and design criteria available from conservation districts or the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). These standards are part of the Pennsylvania Soil and Water Technical Guide (Pennsylvania Technical Guide). Filter area: A sloping grass area used to filter runoff from the livestock yard and some types of solid manure storage systems. Influent waste is distributed uniformly across the high end of the strip and allowed to flow downslope and infiltrate into the soil. Nutrients and suspended material remaining in the runoff water are filtered through the grass, absorbed by the soil, and ultimately taken up by plants. Filter areas must be designed and sized to match the characteristics of the livestock yard or storage facility. Vegetation should be removed periodically to prevent any buildup of nitrogen in the soil that may contaminate surface and groundwater. Geosynthetic liner: A single layer of synthetic geomembrane material or a multiple-layer geocomposite specifically manufactured to be a fluid barrier in an earthen impoundment, and to meet applicable engineering specifications. Glass-lined steel storage: A type of liquid-tight, above ground animal waste storage structure. Located on a concrete pad, it consists of sealed steel panels bolted together and coated inside and outside with glass to provide corrosion protection. Liquid waste: Waste with low solids content that flows and can be easily pumped or transferred through pipes. Pennsylvania Code Title 25: Pennsylvania regulation developed under the authority of various legislation defining and providing for the prevention of watercourse pollution and dam safety including the installation, operation, modification, and maintenance of certain agricultural activities that encroach into streams and their floodways (P.L. 704, No. 294, June 14, 1923). Agricultural waste storage facilities are included in the provisions of the regulation. Enforcement is the responsibility of the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). Pennsylvania Technical Guide, Section IV: Publication of the USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS). Purpose of the publication is to establish minimum acceptable requirements for planning, designing, constructing, and operating and maintaining waste storage facilities, including waste storage structures, ponds, and stacking facilities. The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection requires that the criteria specified be followed for all liquid and semi-solid animal waste storage facilities. Pre-cast concrete storage: A type of liquid-tight animal waste storage structure. Located on a concrete pad, it consists of concrete panels bound together with cable, rods, or bolts and sealed between panels. May be partially or totally below ground. Semi-solid waste: Waste that is difficult to pump yet impossible to handle with a fork. It will flow, not stack, and discharges liquids. Solid waste: Waste material that can be transferred with a fork and handled with a conventional manure-spreader. It will stack and not discharge liquids when protected from rain. Stacking pad: A stabilized surface used for storage and handling of solid animal waste. A waste stacking and handling pad provides an all weather working surface for storage and/or composting of manure, equipment operation, and a method for controlling or excluding surface water flow onto and off the pad. Water table depth: Depth to free water in soil, geologic material, or bedrock. There are two types of water tables: (1) the water table typically noted in a well log as an indication of usable water supply; and (2) the seasonal high water table. The seasonal high water table is the most important for animal waste storage facilities because it may present facility design, construction, and operation problems.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Pennsylvania Farm A Syst package contains the following Worksheets: Introduction Farmstead Map Preliminary Screening Quiz Worksheet #1 Water Well Condition and Construction Worksheet #2 Pesticides and Fertilizer Storage and Handling Worksheet #3 Household Waste Treatment Worksheet #4 Barnyard Management Worksheet #5 Milkhouse Waste Management Worksheet #6 Stream and Drainageway Management Worksheet #7 Petroleum Storage Management Worksheet #8 Silage Storage Management Worksheet #9 Animal Waste Storage Management Overall Farmstead Ranking Material for the Pennsylvania Farm A Syst package was developed by revision of Farm A Syst material from the University of Wisconsin Cooperative Extension Service, University of Nebraska Cooperative Extension, Delaware Cooperative Extension System, and the National Farm A Syst/Home A Syst Program. Additional format and style features for the Pennsylvania package were adapted from the Ontario Environmental Farm Plan published by Ontario Farm Environmental Coalition, Ontario, Canada. Partial funding for development of this worksheet was provided by USDA-EQIP educational funds from the USDA-NRCS. Preparation: Les Lanyon, professor of soil science and management, Penn State, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences. Project Coordinators: Barry Frantz, USDA-NRCS; Les Lanyon, Penn State, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences. Advisory Committee: Fran Koch, environmental planning supervisor, Bureau of Watershed Conservation, Department of Environmental Protection; Larry Martick, district manager, Adams County Conservation District; Tom McCarty, Multi- County Water Quality Agent, Penn State Cooperative Extension; Kelly O Neill, agricultural policy analyst, Chesapeake Bay Foundation; Jerry Martin, Penn State Cooperative Extension, Nutrient Management Education Program; Carl Rohr, conservation program specialist, Bureau of Land and Water Conservation, Department of Environmental Protection. Technical Review: Robert E. Graves, Penn State, Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering; Tim Murphy, USDA-NRCS; John Tyson, Penn State Cooperative Extension; Doug Goodlander, State Conservation Commission. Additional Technical Assistance provided by: Therese Pitterle, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Penn State. College of Agricultural Sciences Cooperative Extension Visit Penn State s College of Agricultural Sciences on the Web: www.cas.psu.edu Penn State College of Agricultural Sciences research, extension, and resident education programs are funded in part by Pennsylvania counties, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture. This publication is available from the Publications Distribution Center, The Pennsylvania State University, 112 Agricultural Administration Building, University Park, PA 16802. For information telephone 814-865-6713. Where trade names appear, no discrimination is intended, and no endorsement by the Cooperative Extension Service is implied. Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension Work, Acts of Congress May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Pennsylvania Legislature. T. R. Alter, Director of Cooperative Extension, The Pennsylvania State University. This publication is available in alternative media on request. Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension Work, Acts of Congress May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Pennsylvania Legislature. T. R. Alter, Director of Cooperative Extension, The Pennsylvania State University. The Pennsylvania State University is committed to the policy that all persons shall have equal access to programs, facilities, admission, and employment without regard to personal characteristics not related to ability, performance, or qualifications as determined by University policy or by state or federal authorities. The Pennsylvania State University does not discriminate against any person because of age, ancestry, color, disability or handicap, national origin, race, religious creed, sex, sexual orientation, or veteran status. Direct all affirmative action inquiries to the Affirmative Action Office, The Pennsylvania State University, 201 Willard Building, University Park, PA 16802-2801; tel. 814-863-0471; TDD 814-865-3175. The Pennsylvania State University 2002 Produced by Information and Communication Technologies in the College of Agricultural Sciences CAT UC177 3M1102ps UCT4171