Director TGP Facility Planning and Gas Control June 3, Prepared for the Harvard Electricity Policy Group

Similar documents
Byron S. Wright Vice President, Corporate Development

Meeting Power Plant Needs

Expanding Existing Pipeline Capacity to Meet New England s Energy Needs. Mike Dirrane Director, Marketing

A Discussion of Natural Gas Pipeline System Efficiency. Gas/Electric Partnership Houston, Texas February 11, 2010

Marcellus Shale Advisory Commission Infrastructure Work Group Meeting El Paso Corporation Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company April 11, 2011

Tennessee Gas Pipeline. New Jersey Highlands Council April 16, 2009

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co, L.L.C. Northeast Energy and Commerce Association September 27, 2012

Spectra Energy - Infrastructure Expansion Solutions

Platts 8 th Annual Pipeline Development & Expansion Conference. Gas-Electric Coordination Update

2010 Annual Winter Reliability Assessment Meeting November 4, Carlos Thillet Manager Gas Supply and Transportation PECO Energy Company

Jim Cleary President, El Paso Western Pipelines. Platts Conference, Rockies Gas & Oil April 25, 2008

NORTHERN UTILITIES, INC. NEW HAMPSHIRE DIVISION ANNUAL COST OF GAS ADJUSTMENT FILING PREFILED TESTIMONY OF FRANCIS X.

PLANNED ENHANCEMENTS, NORTHEAST NATURAL GAS PIPELINE SYSTEMS (as of )

Spectra Energy: Moving Ahead, Gaining Momentum

PLANNED ENHANCEMENTS, NORTHEAST NATURAL GAS PIPELINE SYSTEMS (as of )


Boston LDC Gas Forum National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation Empire Pipeline, Inc.

PLANNED ENHANCEMENTS, NORTHEAST NATURAL GAS PIPELINE SYSTEMS (as of )

Natural Gas Market Conditions; & Gas & Power In New England

PLANNED ENHANCEMENTS, NORTHEAST NATURAL GAS PIPELINE SYSTEMS (as of )

National Association of Publicly Traded Partnerships MLP Conference Presentation New York, New York May 21, 2008

Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Annual Winter Reliability Assessment Meeting

CBIA Energy Conference Natural Gas- Coming to Your Neighborhood Soon October 10, 2013 Cromwell, Connecticut Michael Dirrane Director, Northeast

Author: Greg Lander For The New Jersey Conservation Foundation.

Review of Pipeline Regions

In Response to the New York Energy Highway RFI Spectra Energy Corp s Comments May 30, 2012

Broad market presence: Growing demand regions, key supply basins, LNG terminals. Excellent connections to markets and supply

PLANNED ENHANCEMENTS, NORTHEAST NATURAL GAS PIPELINE SYSTEMS (as of )

PNGTS Continent to Coast Expansion Project. New England Council February 24, 2015

November 9, 2011 Harrisburg, PA

Cheyenne Connector Binding Open Season

Winter 2015 Cold Weather Operations

Energy Security, Economic & Environmental

New Jersey Natural Gas Market Update

Issued February 21, Haynesville Global Access Pipeline LLC. Notice of Non-Binding Open Season

Western Oklahoma Residue Takeaway Impact of Growing SCOOP/STACK Supply

Ruby Pipeline Project

Is New England Over-Reliant On Natural Gas?

October 23, 2018 Harrisburg, PA

DTE Energy s Utility Growth Strategy. Gerard Anderson President & COO April 6, 2006

Wachovia LNG Conference

TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION AND QUALIFICATIONS... II. NED SUPPLY PATH PROPOSAL... III. GAS PRICE FORECASTS... IV. NED SUPPLY PATH QUANTITY... V.

Open Season Market-Based Storage in the Heart of the PA Marcellus Shale Region

Ten Years After Gas & Power in Perspective

Customer WebEx October 10, 2018

Pivotal Energy Development. Dana Grams President, Pivotal Energy Development

Mayor s Energy Task Force ENSTAR Update. October 21, 2014

Albany, NY December 1, Natural Gas Outlook. Presentation to: Northeast Power Coordinating Council (NPCC) General Meeting

Millennium Pipeline Company, L.L.C. 5 th Annual Customer Meeting October 8, Joseph P. Shields President

Issued March 21, Permian Global Access Pipeline LLC. Notice of Non-Binding Open Season

Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC Docket No. RP Exhibit No. TPC-0090

Using Simulation for Optimization

Major Changes in Natural Gas Transportation Capacity,

Regional Gas Market Update

Regional Market Update

Platts Natural Gas Storage Conference. January 2012

Natural Gas Issues and Emerging Trends for the Upcoming Winter and Beyond

UGI ENERGY SERVICES, INC.

North American Midstream Infrastructure Through 2035 A Secure Energy Future. Press Briefing June 28, 2011

Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC RP Technical Conference March 28, 2018

FERC GAS TARIFF VOLUME NO. 1 KO TRANSMISSION COMPANY FILED WITH THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Delivering Supply Options LDC Forum June 1, 2008, Boston. Tim Stringer Manager, U.S. Northeast Markets

The Impact of Recent Hurricanes on U.S. Gas Markets for the Upcoming Winter

Coralie Carter Sculley

Natural Gas/Electric Integration

The Public Need for Gas/Electric Coordination

Natural Gas Outlook for Connecticut. March 14, 2012 Connecticut Power and Energy Society

Panel: Re-plumbing the North American Gas Transmission Grid 2.0

Vector Pipeline L.P. Original Sheet No. 30 FERC Gas Tariff First Revised Volume No. 1 v0.0.0 RATE SCHEDULE FT-1 FIRM TRANSPORTATION SERVICE

Future Trends in Corrosion Control

Access Northeast: Meeting New England s Energy Needs. Acushnet LNG Advisory Committee June 7, 2016

Portland Natural Gas Transmission System. NGA 2017 Regional Market Trends Forum

Assessment of New England s Natural Gas Pipeline Capacity to Satisfy Short and Near- Term Electric Generation Needs: Phase II

Assessment of New England s Natural Gas Pipeline Capacity to Satisfy Short and Near- Term Electric Generation Needs: Phase II

The Impact of Recent Hurricanes on the U.S. Gas Markets for the Upcoming Winter

AES CORPORATION. LNG Review. Aaron Samson Director, LNG Projects

QUESTAR PIPELINE CUSTOMER MEETING MARCH 2017 PARK CITY, UTAH

BINDING OPEN SEASON Rockies Express Pipeline Cheyenne Hub Enhancement

Kern River Gas Transmission Company. Customer Meetings 2018

First Revised Sheet No. 42

2015 The Coal Institute Spring Conference. Swati Daji, SVP Fuels and System Optimization

Connecting Supply Options GasMart May 21, 2008, Chicago

NGPL Winter Operations Review

FPL selects Sabal Trail Transmission and Florida Southeast Connection to build new natural gas pipeline system into Florida

Crestwood Midstream Partners LP

Aspen Energy Orientation Training. Intro to Natural Gas

TGP DART Update Meeting. New York, NY May 18, 2017

NGPL Winter Operations Review

New England s Energy Mix: Clean, Diverse, Responsive and Getting Even Better

Investor Chat Series December 17, Tom O Connor. President & CEO Duke Energy Gas Transmission

FERC GAS TARIFF THIRD REVISED VOLUME NO. 2. (Superseding Second Revised Volume No. 2) WYOMING INTERSTATE COMPANY, L.L.C.

Aliso Canyon Gas Electric Coordination Discussion

Texas Eastern Appalachiaa to Market Expansion Project (TEAM

NASEO WINTER ENERGY OUTLOOK

Regulatory Mechanisms to Ensure Fuel Adequacy U.S. DOE Electricity Advisory Committee

Impact of Shale Gas on Transmission

NGPL Pipeline Operations Review

NATURAL GAS 101 THE BASICS OF NATURAL GAS

Meeting New England s Gas Needs: LNG is Still There and Still Relevant

Energy Market Overview

Transcription:

www.elpaso.com NYSE:EP Anders Johnson Director TGP Facility Planning and Gas Control June 3, 2011 Prepared for the Harvard Electricity Policy Group D E P E N D A B L E N A T U R A L G A S

El Paso Corporation provides natural gas and related energy products in a safe, efficient, and dependable manner

the place to work the neighbor to have the company to own

This presentation includes certain forward-looking statements and projections. The company has made every reasonable effort to ensure that the information and assumptions on which these statements and projections are based are current, reasonable, and complete. However, a variety of factors could cause actual results to differ materially from the projections, anticipated results or other expectations expressed in this presentation, including, without limitation, our ability to execute our strategy of selling assets to El Paso Pipeline Partners, L.P.; our ability to pay dividends declared; changes in unaudited and/or unreviewed financial information; volatility in, and access to, the capital markets; our ability to implement and achieve objectives in our 2011 plan and guidance, including achieving our earnings and cash flow targets; the effects of any changes in accounting rules and guidance; our ability to meet production volume targets in our Exploration and Production segment; the uncertainty of estimating proved reserves and unproved resources, the future level of service and capital costs, the availability and cost of financing to fund our future exploration and production operations; the success of our drilling programs with regard to proved undeveloped reserves and unproved resources; our ability to successfully identify new Midstream opportunities; our ability to comply with the covenants in our various financing documents; our ability to obtain necessary governmental approvals for proposed pipeline and E&P projects and our ability to successfully construct and operate such projects; the risks associated with recontracting of transportation commitments by our pipelines; regulatory uncertainties associated with pipeline rate cases; actions by the credit rating agencies; the successful close of our financing transactions; credit and performance risk of our lenders, trading counterparties, customers, vendors and suppliers; changes in commodity prices and basis differentials for oil, natural gas, and power; general economic and weather conditions in geographic regions or markets served by the company and its affiliates, or where operations of the company and its affiliates are located, including the risk of a global recession and negative impact on natural gas demand; the uncertainties associated with governmental regulation; political and currency risks associated with international operations of the company and its affiliates; competition; and other factors described in the company's (and its affiliates') Securities and Exchange Commission filings. While the company makes these statements and projections in good faith, neither the company nor its management can guarantee that anticipated future results will be achieved. Reference must be made to those filings for additional important factors that may affect actual results. The company assumes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements made herein or any other forward-looking statements made by the company, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. Certain of the production information in this presentation includes the production attributable to El Paso s 48.8 percent interest in Four Star Oil & Gas Company ( Four Star ). El Paso s Supplemental Oil and Gas disclosures, which are included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K, reflect its interest in the proved reserves of Four Star separate from its consolidated proved reserves. In addition, the proved reserves attributable to its interest in Four Star represent estimates prepared by El Paso and not those of Four Star. Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors Investors are urged to closely consider the disclosures and risk factors in our Forms 10-K and 10-Q, available from our offices or from our website at http://www.elpaso.com, including the inherent uncertainties in estimating quantities of proved reserves.

U.S. natural gas infrastructure El Paso pipeline background Pipeline ability to manage load variations Examples from Tennessee Gas Pipeline Linepack and gas fired generation Pipeline expansions Cost recovery thoughts Appendix overview

Transmission pipelines historically operated at a 60% load factor as many were designed to serve winter LDC loads, power demands have altered utilization Pipeline designs are typically based on firm contracted capacity ( n design) Linepack for major transmission lines is measured in Bcf, useable linepack is limited when a pipeline is fully utilized Shale gas supplies have dramatically altered the utilization and available linepack of many pipelines Major gas transmission lines are highly reliable delivering 99.99% of the primary firm scheduled gas

300,000 + miles EIA

Ruby Pipeline Wyoming Interstate Mojave Pipeline Colorado Interstate Gas Cheyenne Plains Pipeline Southern Natural Gas Tennessee Gas Pipeline Elba Island LNG El Paso Natural Gas Gulf LNG (50%) Florida Gas Transmission (50%) 19% of total U.S. interstate pipeline mileage 28 Bcf/d capacity (13% of total U.S.) 17 Bcf/d throughput (26% of gas delivered to U.S. consumers)

13,800 miles 1,000 meters 12 Bcf Linepack (~1 Bcf useful) 90 Bcf Storage 72 Compressor Stations TGP designed to deliver gas evenhourly over a 24 hour day Area of focus for discussion Several pipelines are designed to support uneven hourly demands Approximate values Not to Scale

Bcf/d 1.40 1.20 1.00 0.80 2009 2010 2009 2010 2011 20092010 2011 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 Dec Jan Feb 2009 0.98 0.92 0.83 2010 1.23 1.00 0.79 2011 1.24 1.05 Potential demand Firm Contracted demand 5.1 Bcf/d 1.4 Bcf/d 4 of the 24 power plants account for ~60% of contracted volume

N.E. power plants are contracted for ~60% of their burn capacity. Higher contract levels improve pipeline response time, ability to provide flexibility when not fully utilized, and support new construction.

Several of the following slides contain excerpts from Tennessee s Winter update for power plants. More detailed information and assumptions available: Power Plant Winter Operations Discussion Jan 19 2011

Scheduled (blue) Pipelines offer hourly flexibility when it exists but must restrict flows (secondary and interruptible) to protect firm (primary) shipper rights when pressures fall.

Design --- 1.5 Bcf/d 1.04 Bcf/d Hourly demand, up to 1.5 Bcf/d daily rate, exceeds steady-state transport design of 1.04 Bcf/d LDC hourly variation is typically <40% of the scheduled daily volume Power plant hourly variation has exceeded 400% in extreme cases for brief periods As demand exceeds physical capability linepack drops to minimum levels and pressures fall

Flow Acc Vol Sched Pressure Depending on the time-ofday, diameter, length of pipe, MAOP, and current pressure, millions of cubic feet may be taken from or added to linepack to meet the market Natural Gas Pipelines are a key component in meeting the U.S. intermittent power needs 4 MMscf/h 500 MWh 2.4 Bcf/d leaving pipe 1.6 Bcf/d entering

Encourage use of proper transport agreements Mechanism for PP to flow through transportation charges Either require all plants bidding into the market to hold some nominal percentage of their peak burn as firm transportation, or Require the system operators (ISOs/RTOs) to hold a similar amount of pipeline capacity on behalf of the market Develop new services (linepack, hourly); pipe tariffs vary Encourage new and needed infrastructure now Notification of a trip or excess power/gas coordinated market overview entity Address disconnects between gas and electric day

All Times are Central Clock Time (CCT) Chart Time Evening Nomination Intra-day Cycle-1 Intra-day Cycle-2 Nomination Deadline 11:30 AM 6:00 PM 10:00 AM 5:00 PM Initial Volumes Available 12:15 PM 6:45 PM 10:45 AM 5:45 PM Confirmation Deadline 3:30 PM 9:00 PM 1:00 PM 8:00 PM Scheduled Volumes Available Effective Time 4:30 PM 10:00 PM 2:00 PM 9:00 PM 9:00 AM (next day) 9:00 AM (next day) 5:00 PM (current day) 9:00 PM (current day) Hourly Nominations can be accommodated with a phone call

Depending on pipeline conditions and power plant location linepack on the TGP system can in theory support a 2,000+ MW power load swing for up to 12 hours MMscf

Renewable Technology Working Group (RTWG) H.Durrwachter, Report to TAC February 4, 2010

Flow Acc Vol Sched Pressure Snapshot from TGP s Powerplant SCADA screen Fully loaded pipeline being overpulled resulting in abnormally low pipeline delivery pressures Linepack is regional and may be lowest upstream of a compressor station Parties overtaking may adversely impact firm shippers Cost to control is $MM, who pays

300 Line Project NE Upgrade Project Northampton Southwick CS TGP 300 Line 340 MMcf/d In-service: 2011 NSD Project 220 MMcf/d In-service: 2012 Northeast Upgrade Project 620 MMcf/d In-service: 2013 $1.2 billion investment Producer push

In Service Date: 2015/2016 Incremental Volume: 500 MDth/d + Facilities: 110 mile + pipeline Markets: New England / Iroquois Waddington (TCPL) New England / Iroquois Markets Zones 5, 6 New Pipeline Pipeline Loop Pipeline Interconnections

Restriction Point Percent Days Restricted (Nov Mar) 2008/2009 2009/2010 2010/2011 MLV 223/STA 224 25.17% 0.00% 27.81% Niagara Spur Backhaul 0.00% 0.66% 38.41% STA 245 43.05% 41.72% 96.03% STA 307 20.53% 0.00% 1.32% STA 315 M/S 0.00% 0.00% 25.17% STA 321 49.01% 37.75% 47.68% STA 325 0.00% 0.00% 86.75% MLV 355 M/S 7.28% 26.49% 49.67% MLV 355 S/M 0.00% 0.00% 28.48% Pipeline segment utilization in some areas is nearing 100%, other segments have capacity available to offer flexibility to the marketplace

Dth 2,500,000 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Calendar Month Mainline TGP throughputs have dropped dramatically because of new Marcellus receipts Challenge is supporting infrastructure costs in a decontracting environment to maintain flexibility

1 Mcf = 1000 ft 3 1 Dth = 1,000,000 Btu (HHV) Gas Day begins 9 a.m. central time Linepack is the amount of gas in the pipeline (Mcf or Bcf) MAOP is maximum allowable operating pressure (psig) Tariff explains pipeline commercial rules http://tebb.epenergy.com/ebbmasterpage/tariff/orgchart.aspx?code=tgp Service Priorities: Primary in Path (PIP), SIP, SOP, IT Gas quality specifications Operational Flow Order OFO is an order issued to alleviate conditions which threaten or could threaten the safe operations or system integrity, of the transportation service provider's system or to maintain operations required to provide efficient and reliable firm service