MAE 456 FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS Truss Buckling Analysis LAB INSTRUCTIONS LAB ASSIGNMENT 3. Lab Objectives. Lab Tasks

Similar documents
Example of a modelling review Roof truss

Finite Element Analysis of Concrete Filled Steel Tube Flexural Model

Buckling of a Fixed Pinned Beam

SHEAR PANEL COMPONENT IN THE VICINITY OF BEAM-COLUMN CONNECTIONS IN FIRE

Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Kyushu Institute of Technology, Kitakyushu

AC : DESIGN OPTIMIZATION OF A CAR-TRUCK STAND

twelve rigid frames: compression & buckling ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2019 lecture

CHAPTER 7 ANALYTICAL PROGRAMME USING ABAQUS

Table of contents. EC3 Steel Design - Class 4 calculation of effective characteristics... 5

(a) Pin-Pin P cr = (b) Fixed-Fixed P cr = (d) Fixed-Pin P cr =

SLAB AND WALL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN. Angel Francisco Martinez Civil Engineer MIDASoft

eleven rigid frames: compression & buckling ELEMENTS OF ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2014 lecture

15.2 Approximate Analysis of a Continuous Beam for Gravity Load

Stay Tuned! Practical Cable Stayed Bridge Design

KINETICS Pipe & Duct Seismic Application Manual

To have a clear idea about what really happened and to prevent the

MAE Advanced Computer Aided Design. 03. Beams and Trusses. Solution of Beams and Trusses Problems

five trusses & columns Trusses Trusses Trusses ancient (?) wood 1800 s analysis efficient long spans

Design of a Beam Structure for Failure Prevention at Critical Loading Conditions

five trusses & columns APPLIED ACHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2018 lecture STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS ARCH 631

five trusses & columns APPLIED ACHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2017 lecture STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS ARCH 631

New approach to improving distortional strength of intermediate length thin-walled open section columns

midas Gen MIDAS On-Demand Service midas Gen Advanced Webinar Steel Structure Design

MASONRY INSIGHTS. Finite Element Modeling, Analysis, and Design for Masonry. Introduction

D. Y. Abebe 1, J. W. Kim 2, and J. H. Choi 3

Buckling Analysis. Buckling Analysis

Marian A. GIZEJOWSKI Leslaw KWASNIEWSKI Wael SALAH

Distortional elastic buckling for aluminium: Available prediction models versus design specifications

CH 6: Fatigue Failure Resulting from Variable Loading

Chapter 7. Finite Elements Model and Results

INELASTIC SEISMIC RESPONSE ANALYSES OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE PIERS WITH THREE-DIMENSIONAL FE ANALYSIS METHOD. Guangfeng Zhang 1, Shigeki Unjoh 2

Static linear analysis for trusses structure for supporting pipes

7 LOCAL BUCKLING OF STEEL CLASS 4 SECTION BEAMS

FINITE ELEMENT MODELING OF ANGLE BRACING MEMBER BEHAVIOR IN EXPERIMENTALLY TESTED SUB-FRAME SPECIMENS

DIAGNOSIS OF CRACKS IN STRUCTURES USING FEA ANALYSIS

ACCURATE LINEAR AND NONLINEAR SEISMIC SSI ANALYSIS BASED ON ANSYS FE MODELING USING EXTENDED SASSI METHODOLOGY

Master s Thesis. Flexural Buckling of General Beam Systems. A Method to Determine K-factors using Energy Considerations

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS. Buckling of Columns

CE Advanced Structural Analysis. Lab 3 SAP2000 Beam and Frame Structures

Linear Static Analysis of a Stayed Steel Chimney

Tekla Structural Designer 2017

Analysis of Perforated Steel Channel Members When Subjected to Compression M. Jayakumar BhaskarM.Tech 1 P. Sai Pravardhan ReddyM.

Finite Element Analysis of Failure Modes for Cellular Steel Beams

E APPENDIX. The following problems are intended for solution using finite element. Problems for Computer Solution E.1 CHAPTER 3

Effect of Loading Level and Span Length on Critical Buckling Load

The Static Analysis of the Truss

LARSA 2000/4th Dimension: Staged Construction Analysis

Stress and Fatigue analysis of Weldment of Rectangular Column Structure

SET PROJECT STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF A TROUGH MODULE STRUCTURE, IN OPERATION AND EMERGENCY Luca Massidda

midas Gen Release Note

`Limit State of Collapse in Compression Design of an Axially Loaded Short Column

Precast Concrete Bearing Wall Panel Design (Alternative Analysis Method) (Using ACI )

CHAPTER FIVE 5.1 MODELING OF A TEN-STOREY BUILDING

Next Generation Solution for Building Analysis and Design

Introduction to Structural Analysis TYPES OF STRUCTURES LOADS AND

BEHAVIOUR OF BUILDING FRAMES WITH STEEL PLATE SHEAR WALLS

An example of finite element modelling of progressive collapse

Stress Analysis of Aircraft Fuselage Cockpit Floor Structure Using Patran and Nastran Software and Hand Calculations

Buckling phenomenon for imperfect pipe under pure bending

PERFORMANCE OF DEFICIENT STEEL HOLLOW SQUARE SECTION SHORT COLUMN STRENGTHENED WITH CFRP

Multi-Story Solid Tilt-Up Wall Panel Analysis and Design (ACI 551)

Right Additional Design Procedures

NON-LINEAR FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF BASE-PLATE CONNECTIONS USED IN INDUSTRIAL PALLET RACK STRUCTURES

Abstract Introduction and Background Formulation Results and Discussion Conclusion and Future Work References...

DISTORTIONAL BUCKLING BEHAVIOUR OF FIRE EXPOSED COLD-FORMED STEEL COLUMNS

Load capacity of slender reinforced concrete walls governed by flexural cracking strength of concrete

Application Florea Dinu

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF 200 MPH WIND RATED ALUMASHIELD UPGRADE OPTION FOR OD, 2OD, & 3OD ENCLOSURES

CHAPTER 6 FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS

Buckling Behaviour of Three-Dimensional Prestressed Stayed Columns

Behaviour of Concrete Filled Rectangular Steel Tube Column

UTrAp 2.0. Analysis of Steel Box Girders during Construction. developed at. The University of Texas at Austin

The need to design for robustness in fire. Ian Burgess

Influence of arch bridge skewness

Determination of the main characteristics of semi-rigid beam-to-column connections through numerical and experimental method

FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE PIER COLUMNS SUBJECTED TO SEISMIS LOADING

NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF CIRCULAR HOLLOW STEEL COLUMNS CONFINED WITH FIBER REINFORCED POLYMER UNDER AXIAL COMPRESSION

Control of Earthquake Resistant High Rise Steel Frame Structures

Structural Engineering, Mechanics, and Materials. Preliminary Exam - Structural Design

CE 160 SAP 2000 Notes for 2D Problems. Element and Joint Drawing Tools Global Coordinates of Cursor Position Units in View Window

Optimization Design of Arm Frame of Folding Arm Type Tower Crane Based on ANSYS Ge-ning XU, Wen-ju LIU * and Yan-fei TAO

ANALYTICAL BUCKLING LOADS OF CONCRETE-FILLED STEEL TUBULAR COLUMNS WITH INTERLAYER SLIP

USER BULLETIN 2 FRAME MODELING WITH VECTOR5

TABLE OF CONTENTS FINITE ELEMENT MODELING OF CONCRETE FILLED DOUBLE SKIN

RESILIENT INFRASTRUCTURE June 1 4, 2016

1. Stress Analysis of a Cantilever Steel Beam

Failure Mechanism for Large-Sized Grouted Anchor Bolt under Tensile Load

Lateral Buckling of I-joists

THE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF STEEL SILOS WITH CYLINDRICAL-WALL BEARING AND PROFILE-STEEL BEARING

THE BEHAVIOUR OF LIGHTWEIGHT COMPOSITE FLOOR TRUSSES IN FIRE

Thin-Walled Structures Group

Stability Analysis of Truss Type Highway Sign Support Structures

Application of CAE to Aluminum Wheel Impact Test Analysis Using Dynamic Implicit

Saving Half Through Girder Bridges using Non-Linear Finite Element Analysis

Approximate Analysis of Statically Indeterminate Structures

OVERVIEW OF EMPIRICAL EQUATION PREDICTION FOR ULTIMATE AXIAL LOAD OF PRECAST LIGHTWEIGHT FOAMED CONCRETE SANDWICH PANEL (PLFP)

Full file at

BEHAVIOR OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM WITH OPENING

NUMERICAL MODELLING OF REINFORCEMENT OF CONCRETE COLUMNS BY JACKETING

Tutorial of CUFSM4. Objectives. Example. - C-section with lips

Transcription:

MAE 456 FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS Truss Buckling Analysis LAB INSTRUCTIONS LAB ASSIGNMENT 3 Lab Objectives erform a FEA Eigenvalue buckling analysis of a simple column. erform a FEA Eigenvalue buckling analysis of a 3D truss structure. Verify the buckling analyses with hand calculations. Write up the FEA in an Engineering Report. Lab Tasks The analyses of the truss structure from Lab Assignments 1 and 2 did not account for buckling of members in compression. For slender shapes with heavy axial compressive loads, the structure will fail by buckling before it fails by yielding in axial compression. An Eigenvalue buckling analysis can be performed to determine the force level at which the buckling will occur. 1 To perform a buckling FEA, beam elements must be used for members in compression. 1. First, a simple column buckling test case will be performed to test the capability of SolidWorks to perform a beam buckling analysis, as part of the verification. A pipe is cast into a concrete floor and used to support an axial load as shown in Figure 1. The top of the pipe may move vertically but may not move horizontally. (It may also rotate at the top as shown.) The cross section of the column has a 1.8 in. outside diameter and a wall thickness of 0.15 in. as shown. The pipe is made of AISI 1020 steel. Apply a force = 1000 lbf. 10 ft D = 1.8 in t = 0.15 in Figure 1. ipe column and cross section 1 A non linear FEA stress analysis with slightly off center loading can also be used and may be more accurate.

erform an FEA Eigenvalue buckling analysis for this test case to verify that the FEA results agree closely with Euler s critical buckling load as given by the equation: cr 2 EI. 0.7L 2 Here cr is the load at which buckling failure will occur if the load is increased gradually. The Buckling Load Factor (BLF) is given by BLF = cr /. It gives the factor by which the load(s) can be increased before buckling occurs. Thus the BLF also gives the Factor of Safety (FS) for a buckling analysis. Graph the BLF as a function of the number of elements. Determine the minimum number of beam elements that can accurately represent the solution to 2 decimal places. To perform an Eigenvalue buckling analysis of a truss structure in SolidWorks: a) Create a CAD model of the structure by drawing lines and using a Weldment to define Structural Members based on the lines. Be sure to orient the cross section correctly using the angle input at the bottom of the Structural Member dialog box. Alternatively, use regular solid modeling operations like extrude or sweep to model truss members. Ensure that a material has been assigned to the CAD model. b) erform hand calculations to determine the approximate BLF. c) Create a new Simulation Study. Choose Buckling as the type of study. d) For the structural members of the study, ensure that beam elements are being used: For members not created using Structural Members, in the Simulation Manager, right click on the solid ( ) and select Treat as Beam so that the member is treated as a 1 D element. Ensure that the icon changes to. For members created using Structural Members, under the cut list ( ), under the list of structural members ( ), ensure that the member appears as a beam ( ) and not as a truss element ( ). If necessary, right click on the icon, select Edit Definition and select Beam as the Type. e) Set the analysis to give the first ten buckling modes. Right click on the buckling study ( ) and select roperties Set the number of buckling modes to 10 and press OK. f) Apply the boundary conditions to the joints and run the study in the usual way. You will notice that it gives a Mode Shape number and Load Factor in the information at the top left. This information can also be obtained by right clicking on the Results and selecting List Buckling Factor of Safety. The displayed mode shape can be changed by right clicking on the mode shape amplitude result ( ) and clicking on Edit Definition

Each mode has an Eigenvalue which can be directly interpreted as the Buckling Load Factor. If the loads are increased gradually and proportionately, the structure will fail at the mode with the lowest positive BLF. (If the directions of all the loads are reversed and increased proportionately, then the lowest negative BLF may apply.) Note that the displacements and stresses from an Eigenvalue analysis are scaled arbitrarily. In real life the structure will just continue a sudden deflection according to the mode shape until the structure yields fully or fractures. g) Repeat the analysis with fewer and fewer elements to observe when the BLF converges. In SolidWorks, this can be accomplished by right clicking on the Mesh in the Simulation Manager and selecting Apply Mesh Control. Select the Structural Member and set the Number of elements as desired. Create a graph to show the convergence. Make a conclusion about the minimum number of elements needed to achieve the desired accuracy. 2. erform a buckling analysis of your structure and boundary conditions from Lab Assignment 2. The only difference in setting up the buckling analysis is selecting Buckling instead of Static when creating a new study. For the check calculations, calculate the BLF for the member or section of the structure that is anticipated to buckle first. This will be the BLF (and safety factor) for the entire structure. See the Appendix for more detailed information. Remember that for an FEA buckling analysis: FS cr BLF Eigenvalue Remember that the displacements and stresses shown in an Eigenvalue analysis are scaled arbitrarily. Do not quote any actual stress values from the buckling FEA. 3. Complete a report on the truss buckling analysis. The column buckling analysis does not need to be written up. The report should include the following sections: 1) Summary (What is this report about? What structure did you analyze? What kind of failure did you study? What were the conclusions?) 2) Introduction (What were the objectives and constraints on the design? What kind of failures needed to be considered?) 3) Description of design (including geometric and material information, and mass) 4) Description of failure scenario and the FE model Describe the overall situation. What types of failure are studied? What assumptions are made? Describe the actual physical boundary conditions (loads and supports) for each load case.

Show the mesh and types of elements used. What simplifications did you make for your model? Show how the supports and loading conditions were applied. Which degrees of freedom were restrained at each support? 5) Discussion of results of FE analysis For each load case, for the first positive buckling mode, show how the structure would buckle. What is the factor of safety with respect to the given loads? Compare the factor of safety with that from Assignment 2. Which one is the true factor of safety? Which failure would happen first? 6) Description of verification of FE analysis Does the buckling mode seem reasonable? Is it as expected? Are the support conditions maintained as intended? Is it evident that rotation was restrained or allowed as intended? By hand, calculate Euler s buckling load (cr) for the most critical member (or sub structure). The most critical member (or sub structure) is the one that experiences the buckling first. The Appendix has notes on how to identify the most critical member or they can be identified by looking at which members (or sub structure) are most highly displaced in the first positive mode of the buckling FEA. The Appendix also shows how to calculate Euler s buckling load for different end conditions. Compute the Buckling Load Factor (BLF) for the critical member (BLF = cr / ), where is the actual load that is expected for that member. The actual load can be obtained from the hand calculations from Assignment 1 or by multiplying the stress from the Assignment 1 FEA by the cross sectional area. Compare the BLF for the critical member (which is also the BLF for the entire structure) with the BLF from the FEA. 7) Conclusions (Will the structure fail? What is the safety factor? Will it fail first by yielding or buckling? How heavy is the structure?) Be sure there is no confusion about units. The report should be about 15 pages long, having mostly figures and calculations. A template is provided on the course web page. 4. Submit the report electronically via ecampus. The DF document file name must start with your name and include the assignment number. Due date/time: April 5.

Appendix ractical Aspects of Using Euler s Buckling Formula