Development of Foster Wheeler s Vision 21 Partial Gasification Module

Similar documents
Perspective on Coal Utilization Technology

Internal Recirculation Circulating Fluidized-Bed Boilers

SOME ENERGY-EFFICIENT TECHNOLOGIES IN JAPAN

Chapter 2.6: FBC Boilers

Pre-Combustion Technology for Coal-fired Power Plants

POINT SOURCES OF POLLUTION: LOCAL EFFECTS AND IT S CONTROL Vol. II - Clean Coal Technologies - Bingjiang Liu

The Role of Engineering Simulation in Clean Coal Technologies

Chapter 13. Thermal Conversion Technologies. Fundamentals of Thermal Processing

The Enerjetik RJ2 Gasifier. Do we finally have the right gasifying system for the Ceramic Industry?

Repowering Conventional Coal Plants with Texaco Gasification: The Environmental and Economic Solution

Drying of High-Moisture Coals For Power Production & Gasification

The Value Proposition of Circulating Fluidized Bed Scrubbing Technology. Robert Giglio Foster Wheeler Global Power Group

PRODUCTION OF SYNGAS BY METHANE AND COAL CO-CONVERSION IN FLUIDIZED BED REACTOR

Gasification of Municipal Solid Waste

Development status of the EAGLE Gasification Pilot Plant

CARBONIZER TESTS WITH LAKELAND FEEDSTOCKS

Research and Development Initiatives of WRI

Testing and Feasibility Study of an Indirectly Heated Fluidized-Bed Coal Gasifier

Improving Flexibility of IGCC for Harmonizing with Renewable Energy - Osaki CoolGen s Efforts -

Co-firing of Torrefied Biomass and Coal in Oxy FBC with Ilmenite Bed Material

Fluid Bed Scrubbing TECHNOLOGY

Questions. Downdraft biomass gasifier. Air. Air. Blower. Air. Syngas line Filter VFD. Gas analyzer(s) (vent)

1. Process Description:

Evaporative Gas Cooling and Emissions Control Solutions

Chemical Looping Gasification Sulfur By-Product

CO 2 capture using lime as sorbent in a carbonation/calcination cycle

FABRICATION OF GASIFIER

Taravosh Jam Design & Engineering Co.

Energy Production Systems Engineering

Acid Gas Control Systems. Spray-Dry Scrubbers and Dry Injection Systems. United McGill products. a McGill AirClean product

Worldwide Pollution Control Association. August 3-4, 2010

MASTER. Livingston, New Jersey Conference Sponsor: Integrated' CarbonizerKPFBC Pilot Plant. Authors: Contractor: Contract Number :

CO 2 Capture and Storage: Options and Challenges for the Cement Industry

NEW TECHNOLOGIES IN COAL-FIRED THERMAL POWER PLANTS FOR MORE EFFECTIVE WORK WITH LESS POLLUTION

A Review of Sulfide Smelting Process Gas Handling Systems

Introduction: Thermal treatment

New 790-Megawatt Unit. Council Bluffs Energy Center

- The Osaki CoolGen Project -

CLEAN COAL TECHNOLOGIES, CHALLENGES AND FUTURE SCOPE

Module 4 : Hydrogen gas. Lecture 29 : Hydrogen gas

GASIFICATION THE WASTE-TO-ENERGY SOLUTION SYNGAS WASTE STEAM CONSUMER PRODUCTS TRANSPORTATION FUELS HYDROGEN FOR OIL REFINING FERTILIZERS CHEMICALS

Incineration (energy recovery through complete oxidation) Mass Burn Refuse Derived Fuel Pyrolysis Gasification

EVALUATION OF AN INTEGRATED BIOMASS GASIFICATION/FUEL CELL POWER PLANT

Design, Construction, and Commissioning of a Pilot-Scale Dual Fluidized Bed System for CO 2 Capture

Sorbents Evaluation Testing Facilities. 95% removal efficiency or an emission standard of lbs/gw h by 2012, while

METHANOL CONVERTER AND SYNLOOP DESIGNS FOR GASIFICATION PLANTS

INDIRECTLY HEATED FLUIDIZED BED BIOMASS GASIFICATION USING A LATENT HEAT BALLAST

Catalytic Activated Ceramic Dust Filter a new technology for combined removal of dust, NOx, dioxin, VOCs and acids from off gases.

Ronald L. Schoff Parsons Corporation George Booras Electric Power Research Institute

Boiler & Heater Group

Technology Overview. Renewable Natural Gasification - RNG: How It Works:

Omya Water & Energy omya.com. Flue Gas Cleaning. Sustainable and efficient flue gas desulfurization (FGD)

OPERATING EXPERIENCE OF CIRCULATING FLUIDIZED BED SCRUBBING TECHNOLOGY IN UTILITY SIZE POWER PLANTS AND REFINERIES

APPLICATION OF BGL GASIFICATION OF SOLID HYDROCARBONS FOR IGCC POWER GENERATION

Carbon To X. Processes

DESCRIPTION OF GASIFICATION EQUIPMENT AT THE ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER

Application of CFB (Circulating Fluidized Bed) to Sewage Sludge Incinerator

Fluidized bed Oxy-fuel combustion and CCS

Process simulation activities at Politecnico di Milano on Ca-based solid looping cycles

Production of synthesis gas from liquid or gaseous hydrocarbons, and the synthesis gas per se, are covered by group C01B 3/00.

INDUSTRIAL ACCESSORIES COMPANY

DISCLAIMER. Portions of this document may be illegible electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document.

COMPREHENSIVE MSW PROCESSING STEPS BIO COKE METHOD

Technology Development Partner

Nuclear Hydrogen for Production of Liquid Hydrocarbon Transport Fuels

In nature nothing is created, nothing is lost, everything changes. Antoine-Laurent de Lavoisier

Polk Power Key Lessons for IGCC Gasification Technologies Conference October 15, 2015

Simulation and Prediction of Pollutants in a Flexi-Burn Oxyfuel Pulverized Coal Power Plant

Customizing Syngas Specifications with E-Gas Technology Gasifier

Sulfur Tail Gas Thermal Oxidizer Systems By Peter Pickard

Power Generation from Solid Fuels 4) Springer

PRECOMBUSTION TECHNOLOGY for Coal Fired Power Plant

Clean Coal Technology

Electricity. Part 5: Coal Power Plants, Particulate Mater, Flue Gasses, Carbon Capture and Storage. Original slides provided by Dr.

State Of The Art (SOTA) Manual For Non-Hazardous Onsite Remediation Processes

An Opportunity for Methanol; the Production Starting from Coal

WRI S PRE GASIFICATION TREATMENT OF PRB COALS FOR IMPROVED ADVANCED CLEAN COAL GASIFIER DESIGN

Energy Procedia

CEMENT PLANT ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY FOR ACHIEVING HIGH SO 2 REMOVAL

OUTOTEC ENERGY SOLUTIONS BENEFITS

Advanced Coal Power Plant Water Usage

Energy-Crop Gasification

CO 2 Capture. John Davison IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme.

CO2 Capture with Foster Wheeler s Flexi-burn TM CFB Technology

Feature: New Project Development Using Innovative Technology

Fossil Energy. Fossil Energy Technologies. Chapter 12, #1. Access (clean HH fuel) Coal. Air quality (outdoor)

The Progress of Osaki CoolGen Project

Samcheok Green Power 4 x 550 MW e Supercritical Circulating Fluidized-Bed Steam Generators in South Korea

Research & Development Needs for the Clean Coal Plant of the Future

Waste-To-Energy New Technologies

C R. ombustion esources, Inc. Evaluation of Stratean Inc. Gasifier System. 18 March Consultants in Fuels, Combustion, and the Environment

Commercial Viability of Near-Zero Emissions Oxy-Combustion Technology for Pulverized Coal Power Plants

Borregaard Case Study. Sarpsborg I & II

Mikko Hupa Åbo Akademi Turku, Finland

New Power Plant Concept for Moist Fuels, IVOSDIG

Smart CHP from Biomass and Waste

WESTINGHOUSE PLASMA GASIFICATION

DRY HYDRATED LIME INJECTION FOR COAL-FIRED BOILER FLUE GAS DESULFURIZATION (FGD) FOREWORD

Integrated Membrane Reactor for Pre-Combustion CO 2 Capture

GE Power. Smarter. Cleaner. Industry. Iron & Steel 2017 STEAM POWER SYSTEMS INDUSTRY PRODUCT CATALOG

Transcription:

Development of Foster Wheeler s Vision 21 Partial Gasification Module A. Robertson, Foster Wheeler Development Corporation Presented at the Vision 21 Program Review Meeting Morgantown, West Virginia November 6-7, 2001 Foster Wheeler Development Corporation Livingston, New Jersey

Development of Foster Wheeler s Vision 21 Partial Gasification Module A. Robertson Foster Wheeler Development Corporation Livingston, NJ ABSTRACT The US Department of Energy (DOE) has awarded Foster Wheeler Development Corporation a contract to develop a partial gasification module (PGM) that represents a critical element of several potential coal-fired Vision 21 plants. When utilized for electrical power generation, these plants will operate with efficiencies greater than 60% while producing near zero emissions of traditional stack gas pollutants. The new process partially gasifies coal at elevated pressure producing a coal derived syngas and a char residue. The syngas can be used to fuel the most advanced power producing equipment such as solid oxide fuel cells or gas turbines or processed to produce clean liquid fuels or chemicals for industrial users. The char residue is not wasted; it can also be used to generate electricity by fueling boilers that drive the most advanced ultra-supercritical pressure steam turbines. The unique aspect of the process is that it utilizes a pressurized circulating fluidized bed partial gasifier and does not attempt to consume the coal in a single step. To convert all the coal to syngas in a single step requires extremely high temperatures ( 2500 to 2800F) that melt and vaporize the coal and essentially drive all coal ash contaminants into the syngas. Since these contaminants can be corrosive to power generating equipment, the syngas must be cooled to near room temperature to enable a series of chemical processes to clean the syngas. Foster Wheeler s process operates at much lower temperatures that control/minimize the release of contaminants; this eliminates/minimizes the need for the expensive, complicated syngas heat exchangers and chemical cleanup systems typical of high temperature gasification. By performing the gasification in a circulating bed, a significant amount of syngas can still be produced despite the reduced temperature and the circulating bed allows easy scale up to large size plants. Rather than air, it can also operate with oxygen to facilitate sequestration of stack gas carbon dioxide gases for a 100% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. The amount of syngas and char produced by the PGM can be tailored to fit the production objectives of the overall plant, i.e., power generation, clean liquid fuel production, chemicals production, etc. Hence, PGM is a robust building block that offers all the advantages of coal gasification but in a more user friendly form; it is also fuel flexible in that it can use alternative fuels such as biomass, sewerage sludge, etc. This paper describes the test program and pilot plant that will be used to develop the PGM.

INTRODUCTION Vision 21 is a cost-shared partnership between the U.S. Government and industry. One of its objectives is to develop the design basis for coal-fueled electric generating plants that operate with efficiencies greater than 60% while producing near zero emissions of traditional stack gas pollutants. The cost of electricity generated by these new plants should be comparable to, if not less than, that of present plants and ideally should be amenable to sequestration of stack carbon dioxide gases. The objectives of the Vision 21 program can be met via many different pathways. One of these is the coal gasification route, utilizing a combined cycle to achieve the high efficiency targeted in the Vision 21 program. Current gasification systems (especially the entrained flow type) must operate at high temperatures, well above 2500EF, to achieve high carbon conversion efficiency. These high temperatures essentially release all of the coal s contaminants to the syngas, and chemical-type cleaning systems must be provided to remove the contaminants. Present cleaning systems operate at about 100EF and large, expensive heat exchangers or gas quench systems must be provided to cool the syngas. Because the hot syngas contaminants can be extremely corrosive, the heat exchanger tubes must be kept at relatively low temperatures; and, with gas turbine discharge temperatures limited to 1100 to 1200EF, these technologies cannot easily accommodate advanced steam temperatures ( 1300EF). An alternate route proposed by Foster Wheeler is a partial gasifier module (PGM); it operates at lower temperatures that minimize the release of coal contaminants and enable the syngas to be fired hot. The PGM can operate with air, enriched air, or pure oxygen. The admission of pure oxygen requires that the flue gas be recycled or water added to control PGM temperature. The utilization of pure oxygen eliminates all nitrogen from the flue gas and provides a suitable exhaust stream for direct CO 2 sequestration. Because of the lower temperature, a char is produced along with the syngas, and the former is combusted in an Atmospheric or Pressurized Circulating Fluid Bed Combustor (ACFBC or PCFBC) or a High-Temperature Air Furnace (HITAF). The syngas and char generated in the PGM allow the use of high efficiency gas turbines together with the most advanced steam cycles. In addition to generating electric power, a portion of the syngas could be used to co-produce valuable by-products such as liquid fuels and/or chemicals. Since FW s proposed plant utilizes char combustion to achieve steam temperatures of 1300EF, PGM carbon conversion efficiencies need only be in the 80% range or even lower. These conversion levels can be easily achieved with a fluidized bed reactor operating at about 1800EF. Hence the plant will not be restricted to reactive coals; it can handle less reactive coals as well as alternative fuels such as petroleum coke. Coal-fired atmospheric fluidized bed boilers were originally marketed as bubbling bed units. As the technology advanced and moved to larger sized units, the bubbling bed was replaced by the circulating bed because the latter gave, among other things, superior performance with hard to burn fuels, was more compact, required fewer feed points, and was more easily scalable to large size units. Based on this experience, we have selected a circulating bed

configuration for the PGM. The PGM will provide excellent feedstock and operating flexibility, will be amenable to system scale up, and the compact nature of the module will allow the use of shop fabrication and barge transportation, resulting in reduced installation, erection, and overall capital cost. These advantages constitute impressive gains over the present state of the technology and are a major step toward achieving Vision 21 goals. PARTIAL GASIFIER MODULE The PGM consists of a pressurized circulating fluidized bed (PCFB) reactor together with a recycle cyclone and a particulate removing barrier filter. Coal, air, steam, and possibly sand are fed to the bottom of the PCFB reactor and establish a relatively dense bed of coal/char in the bottom section. As these constituents react, a hot syngas is produced which conveys the solids residue vertically up through the reactor and into the recycle cyclone. Solids elutriated from the dense bed and contained in the syngas are collected in the cyclone and drain via a dipleg back to the dense bed at the bottom of the PCFB reactor. This recycle loop of hot solids acts as a thermal flywheel and promotes efficient solid-gas chemical reaction. Left untreated the syngas will contain tar/oil vapors, alkali vapors, and hydrogen sulfide at levels dependent on PGM operating conditions and fuels. The downstream users of the syngas will dictate a tolerance level for each of these gas constituents. If the users can tolerate both tar vapors and hydrogen sulfide, the syngas can be cooled to an intermediate level that only condenses the alkali vapors on the particulate being removed by the barrier filter. Although this is a simple solution to an alkali problem, syngas cooling typically lowers the plant efficiency. When efficiency is to be maximized, as in the case of Vision 21 plants, the clean up can be done hot/without syngas cooling. In this case, lime based sorbents can be fed to the PCFB reactor along with the coal to catalytically enhance tar cracking and react with the hydrogen sulfide to capture the sulfur as calcium sulfide. Depending upon sorbent feed rates and gas residence times, the hydrogen sulfide can be reduced to near equilibrium levels which for high sulfur fuels (>3% sulfur) amounts to 95 to 98% sulfur capture. Alkali levels can be brought to gas turbine acceptable levels by injecting finely ground getter material such as emathlite or bauxite into the syngas downstream of the recycle cyclone. The fine particulate that escapes the recycle cyclone together with the injected alkali getter material are carried into the barrier filter by the syngas. As the syngas flows through the porous filter elements, the particulate collects on the outside of the elements and forms a permeable dust cake that ensuing syngas must pass through. The getter absorbs the alkali vapors as the syngas flows to the filter and passes through the filter dust cake. As the dust cake thickness increases, the filter pressure drop increases. Upon reaching a predetermined pressure drop, the dust cake is blown off the element by a back pulse of a clean high-pressure gas such as nitrogen injected into the clean side of the element. The dislodged dust cake falls to the bottom of the filter vessel and drains from the unit. If even higher sulfur capture efficiencies are desired, a second more reactive sorbent can be injected into the syngas for enhanced filter cake sulfur capture. Although the barrier filter is provided to reduce syngas particulate loadings to less than 1 ppm, it can also serve as a reactor in that its filter cake can be used for alkali vapor removal and sulfur capture. The char-sorbent-getter residue

generated in the PGM drains continuously from the filter along with an intermittent PCFB reactor bed drain for transfer to the char combustor. The proposed partial gasifier module (PGM) represents a building block of the Vision 21 program, which can be connected with a variety of additional modules to form complete Vision 21 plants (Figure 1). The PGM represents an enabling technology within the Vision 21 framework in that it can serve as a central processing unit for converting the raw fuel (coal, coke, biomass, or other opportunity fuels) into useful by-products (electricity, steam, chemicals, or transportation fuels). VISION 21 PLANT ARRANGEMENT Figure 1 Vision 21 Modules Enabling Technologies An example of a high-efficiency plant incorporating an air blown PGM is illustrated in Figure 2. The overall plant schematic highlights the integration of all the modules forming the fundamental building blocks of the Vision 21 plant. The PGM serves as the initial fuel processing unit, converting the fuel feedstock into both a syngas and a solid limestone-char residue. The high temperature barrier filter functions to remove particulate and other contaminants from the gas stream, thus assuring a clean syngas exiting the PGM. The main components of the air blown, partial gasifier syngas are CO 2, N 2, CO, H 2, CH 4, and H 2 O. In the Figure 2 plant arrangement, the syngas is split into two separate streams. One stream is cooled to 1200EF, after which it is introduced into a desulfurization unit for further H 2 S removal prior to entering a solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC). Presently, efforts are underway to develop high temperature ( 1000EF) sulfur removal systems for IGCC plants. The Vision 21 program requires development of even more advanced gas stream purification systems that are suitable for synthesis gas conversion, and fuel cell applications. Gas stream purification is also a critical module in the development of Vision 21 plants, and advancements in this area can directly benefit the proposed plant.

Once all of the sulfur species are removed from the syngas, it is admitted into the fuel cell. The SOFC technology is best suited for this cycle because of the high operating temperatures of the air and the syngas. The SOFC is outfitted with all solid-state ceramic components and may be enhanced to operate at temperatures up to 2300EF. The syngas generated in the partial gasifier module is well suited for fuel cell operation since hydrogen is one of the main chemical components. The methane component in the syngas can also be readily converted through a steam reforming process to produce additional hydrogen. For the purposes of defining overall plant efficiency, the fuel cell utilization is assumed to be 50%. The fuel cell represents one of the essential enabling technologies defined in the Vision 21 program, and the PGM is poised to take full advantage of all improvements in this technology. The solid char that is generated in the PGM can be fired either in an ACFBC, PCFBC, or HITAF. The selection of the combustion technology will depend upon the characteristics of the fuel feedstock to be used. The HITAF is designed to operate at atmospheric pressure and to indirectly heat pure air supplied to the topping combustor, whereas the PCFBC operates at elevated pressure and provides vitiated air directly to the topping combustor. It should be noted that both of these combustion technologies are included as enabling technologies within the Vision 21 advanced combustion systems program. An ACFBC can also be incorporated into a Vision 21 plant using the PGM. The combustion system, in conjunction with the gas turbine heat recovery unit/hrsg, will provide the necessary thermal duty for the steam cycle. The proposed Vision 21 plant arrangement employs a double reheat steam cycle operating at 6000 psi/1300ef/1300ef/1300ef. The back end of the Figure 2 plant incorporates advanced FGD and SCR systems to achieve near zero emissions of NOx and SOx. Although economic trade-offs will need to be made between pollutant capture within the process versus post-process pollutant removal, back-end exhaust cleanup is a sure necessity to meet the minimum emission requirements of Vision 21 plants. Hence, advanced back-end cleanup systems are also critical Vision 21 plant modules.

Figure 2 Advanced Air-Blown Vision 21 Plant Arrangement Although the Vision 21 plant arrangement illustrated in Figure 2 utilizes air as the oxidant, the system is also amenable to oxygen-rich firing to make it suitable for CO 2 sequestration. The four oxidant consuming reactors, the partial gasifier, fuel cell, topping combustor, and advanced combustion system will need to incorporate oxygen firing. Although the proposed cycle is optimized for electrical power generation, the syngas can also be used in the production of liquid transportation fuels, such as methanol and ethanol, as well as the production of ammonia. Depending upon the prevailing market price for these chemical products, it may be economical, under certain conditions, to switch from the generation of electrical power to the production of marketable co-products. Pilot Plant for PGM Development/Testing Foster Wheeler possesses a coal-fired PCFB pilot plant at its John Blizard Research Center in Livingston, NJ. The pilot plant has a maximum heat input rating of 12 million Btu per hour, and its PCFB reactor can be operated either as a partial gasifier or a combustor. Figures 3 and 4 depict the PGM test module and pilot plant. The plant typically operates with coal, and limestone or dolomite can be injected with the coal to serve as sulfur capturing sorbents. The coal and sorbent are delivered to the plant, dried, crushed and screened to size in either 2000 lb. super-sacks or in pneumatic transport tanker trucks. Coal, sorbent, and sand can be fed to the process via dry, lock hopper type pneumatic transport feed systems or mixed with water and pumped in as a nitrogen atomized paste.

When the coal and limestone are delivered to the site in separate supersacks, they are loaded into separate 10-ton silos located behind/outside the back wall of the laboratory. A series of bucket elevators, vibrating feeders, belt conveyors, etc., load and transfer these materials into the building into separate lock hopper systems. Side loading chutes not shown in Fig. 4 allow materials to be manually loaded into the conveyors without having to pass through the silos. If dry feeding is selected, the lock hoppers are pressurized with 70EF nitrogen, vented to atmosphere, and then repressurized to match the pressure of the feed hoppers located beneath them. After matching pressures, the lock hoppers transfer their materials by gravity to their feed hoppers. Pressurized feeders at the bottom of each hopper withdraw the coal or limestone and discharge them to a common pipe for pneumatic transport to the PCFB reactor. Sand can also be gravity fed into the reactor via a lock hopper provided above the unit. The reactor is a 30 in. OD x 39.5 ft. tall pressure vessel refractory lined to a 7 in. ID. Air, coal, and lime-based sorbent are injected into the unit through a central, vertical, stainless steel feed pipe at the bottom. Low-Btu syngas generated in the unit leaves through a 4 in. ID radial nozzle at the top. Spent bed material and char are drained from the bottom via an annulus that surrounds the feed pipe. The annulus leads to a nitrogen aerated packed bed where the draining material is cooled to 300EF before leaving through a 4 in. drain. The draining material is withdrawn in batches and depressured in a lock hopper provided under the PCFB reactor. The syngas exiting from the top of the unit passes through a stainless steel primary stage cyclone located within an adjoining refractory lined pressure vessel. Particulate (hot char, sorbent, and sand) captured by the primary cyclone drains through a vertical dipleg and returns to the base of the PCFB reactor to permit the continuous circulation of hot material through the unit. As the char is consumed and ground up by its continuous recirculation through the system, the finer fraction eventually escapes the primary cyclone. This fine material together with the syngas are cooled to 650EF by a tubular heat exchanger and ultimately passed through a barrier type candle filter for the removal of all remaining particulate. The filter utilizes 2-3/8 in. OD by 60 in. long porous metal candles made of iron aluminide. Particulate collects on the outside of the candles; and as a dust cake forms, the pressure drop across the candle filter increases. Upon reaching a predetermined pressure differential, the dust cake is removed/blown off the candles by a back pulse of nitrogen gas. The dust cake falls to the bottom and drains by gravity to surge and lock hoppers provided under the filter for depressuring and removal. The higher the syngas dust loading and the higher the gas velocity through the candles, the more rapidly the filter pressure drop builds up and the more frequently it has to be pulse cleaned. To reduce the size and hence cost of the filter, a precleaning cyclone has been provided upstream of the filter.

RECYCLE CYCLONE SYNGAS COOLER 7" DIA SYN- GAS PCFB GASIFIER RD000-20-3 FILTER 39'-6" CYCLONE CHAR CHAR STEAM OXYGEN FUEL

Fig. 4 Schematic of VISION 21 Pilot Plant

After passing through the filter, the syngas is depressured to ambient via a choked flow orifice and a water spray used to cool the gas to approximately 300EF. To satisfy NJ air permitting requirements, the cooled syngas is passed through a baghouse filter and then burned in an enclosed flare. Test Program To support the PGM development effort, a series of test runs will be conducted in the PCFB pilot plant. The tests will identify syngas yields, heating values, and compositions when processing both non-caking and highly caking bituminous coals as well as petroleum coke; in addition, sawdust will be cofired with the coke and the effects of enriching the air with oxygen will be studied. Testing is expected to begin in October, 2001, and end in the spring of 2002.