Rail & Transit Alternatives Analysis. NH Capitol Corridor. Public Scoping Meeting. March 5, 2014

Similar documents
Massachusetts Rail Plan. September 16, 2010

12 Evaluation of Alternatives

Overview of Alternatives Analysis

SOUTHWEST LRT (METRO GREEN LINE EXTENSION)

APPENDIX TRAVEL DEMAND MODELING OVERVIEW MAJOR FEATURES OF THE MODEL

Bow Concord I-93 Improvements City of Concord Transportation Policy Advisory Committee

3.2 Description of the Alternatives Evaluated in this DSEIS

S-16: Sounder Rail Extension from Puyallup to Orting

VRE Gainesville-Haymarket Extension (GHX) Study. December 16, 2016

2040 Transportation Policy Plan Conversion to Performance Based Planning Basis. 25 th Annual CTS Transportation Research Conference May 21, 2014

Contents i Contents Page 1 A New Transportation Plan Community Involvement Goals and Objectives... 11

What is the Transportation Policy Plan (TPP)?

Sounder Extension to DuPont

Chapter 4. Recommendations

Planning Group. Alternative Screening Presentations October/November Bow-Concord Interstate 93 Transportation Planning Study

2004 FEASIBILITY STUDY UPDATE

Alternatives Analysis, New Starts

BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION MEMORANDUM

VRE Gainesville-Haymarket Alternatives Analysis Report

Service Routes and Community Transit Hubs: Right Sizing Transit NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RURAL PUBLIC AND INTERCITY TRANSPORTATION OCTOBER 2-5, 2016

Table of Contents. Green Line Extension Project. Draft Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Assessment and Draft Section 4(f) Evaluation

Welcome to the VRE Gainesville-Haymarket Extension (GHX) Study Community Meeting

Assessment of Current Status, Plans, and Preliminary Alternatives for High Capacity Transportation in the I-5 Corridor

South Sounder Capital Improvements Program

LONG BRIDGE CAPACITY NEEDS. Oscar J. Gonzalez Virginia Railway Express Project Manager Alexandria, VA

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)/ Section 106 Public Meeting Proposed Alternatives. December 14, 2017

King of Prussia Rail Project Frequently Asked Questions - Archive Version: Summer 2018

Chapter Thirteen Transportation

1.1 Environmental Assessment/Environmental Impact Evaluation for the New Haven, Hartford and Springfield High-Speed Intercity Rail Project

2030 Transportation Policy Plan SUMMARY PRESENTATION. Land Use Advisory Committee November 15, 2012

Green Line extension Project Fall 2009

Executive Summary. ES.1 Project Overview

Executive Summary and Staff Recommendation

Red Line/HealthLine Extension Major Transportation Improvement Analysis

Gainesville- Haymarket Extension (GHX) VRE Operations Board Work Session July 15, 2016

Alternatives Evaluation Report. Appendix C. Alternatives Evaluation Report

Section 2: Transit Planning for Major Investments and New Starts

1.201 / / ESD.210 Transportation Systems Analysis: Demand and Economics. Assignment 2

METRA UP-W LINE. Locally Preferred Alternative Report

The Policies section will also provide guidance and short range policies in order to accomplish the goals and objectives.

Fairmount Line Feasibility Study

TRANSPORTATION FACTS. OUR CUSTOMERS: Travel Patterns

Transit Service Guidelines

I-20 East Transit Initiative

Energy Savings by replacing old facility o Energy savings o Emissions

Executive Summary October 2017

Project Overview. A Collaborative Effort

PUBLIC HEARING April 24, 2017

Chicago Transit Authority Orange Line Alternatives Analysis Study

MARC Brunswick/Frederick Line Improvement Proposal

EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES CARRIED FORWARD

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

Table of Contents. Introduction 1. E1 Purpose and Need 1. E2 Alternatives Development Approach 7. E3 Tier I Alternatives 9. E4 Tier II Alternatives 13

Introduction to Transportation Systems

Cost / Benefit Analysis Table 1: Input variables used in Cost / Benefit Analysis Parameters Units Values General External Costs -Vehicles

TSM/TDM (Transit and Roadway Efficiency) Concept - Analysis and Results

FINAL. Sound Transit Long-Range Plan Update Issue Paper S.6: Potential Tacoma Link Extension - East. Prepared for: Sound Transit

Final Environmental Impact Statement and Section 4(f) Evaluation

Environmental Assessment of Rail Infrastructure in Illinois

Environmental Impact Statement for the Green Line to the Airport Project. ACTION: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).

VII. FREIGHT MANAGEMENT

Adoption of New DART Service Standards

Greenbush Project FAQ's Last Updated: July 26, 2004

KNOXVILLE REGIONAL TRANSIT CORRIDOR STUDY

Twin Cities-Milwaukee-Chicago Intercity Passenger Rail Phase I Study Twin Cities- Milwaukee High Speed Rail to Chicago Corridor Study

Future Build Alternative Traffic Forecasts and Level of Service Analysis

Ann Arbor Station Environmental Review. Public Information Meetings April 2, 2014

Lynnwood Link Extension 2013 Draft EIS Comments and Responses. Page 945

Ron O Blenis, PE Senior Rail Project Manager (617)

Service Development. Committee of the Whole April 3, 2019 Adam Harrington, Director of Service Development 1

South Fulton Parkway Transit Feasibility Study Stakeholder Committee Meeting #2

BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION MEMORANDUM. DATE January 21, 2010

Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. DRAFT. Appendices. MIS Appendices

South Sounder Capital Improvements Program

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE. Memphis MPO March 30, 2015

Evaluation of Alternatives

SERVICE IMPROVEMENT STRATEGIES AND SCENARIOS

Green Line COLLEGE AVENUE TO MYSTIC VALLEY PARKWAY. November 20, 2017 Public Information Meeting

GUIDING PRINCIPLES MPO TRANSIT STUDY

CHAPTER 2.0: INTRODUCTION

VTrans2040 Multimodal Transportation Plan Corridors of Statewide Significance Needs Assessment Western Mountain Corridor (L)

Transit, Intercity Bus, Taxi 8-1

Transit Demand Analysis

This document has been developed to provide context to the Board as part of the strategic planning process. Regional development and travel trends

TRANSPORTATION RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER ELEMENTS OF THE PLAN AND COUNTY REGULATIONS VISION FOR TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ROAD NETWORK SECTION 7

Why a Public-Private Partnership might be used to deliver passenger rail

Chapter 1: Overview. page 1. Figure 2-1: Road congestion is expected to continue to grow

11. Operating and Maintenance Costs

Central Valley Rail Working Group 1. INTRODUCTIONS

CTA Blue Line Forest Park Branch Feasibility/Vision Study: Transit Ridership Forecasting Analysis Technical Memorandum Submitted By

I-20 East Transit Initiative

Environmental Consequences

3.0 REVIEW OF PREVIOUS STUDIES

Moving the first state forward! Delaware s Statewide Long- Range Transportation Plan November 17, 2010 WILMAPCO Our Town

C-11: Madison Street BRT

Sustainability Metrics and Mapping Tool for Environmental Assessment of Rail Infrastructure in Illinois

Green Line Extension EOT. Project Location. Project Purpose. Environmental Impact Report Public Scoping Session

APPENDIX A - PLANS AND POLICY REVIEW FEBRUARY 2017

STUDY OVERVIEW. Federal Railroad Administration Southeast Regional Rail Planning Study. Stakeholder Group Workshop 1 Columbia, South Carolina

Transcription:

NH Capitol Corridor Rail & Transit Alternatives Analysis Public Scoping Meeting March 5, 2014

Agenda Study overview National Environmental Policy Act Preliminary alternatives: rail, bus, stations, layover facilities Objectives/benefits Evaluation criteria, assessment of alternatives Final alternatives Next steps/implementation

Schedule

NEPA Process What is the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)? Establishes procedural requirements for all federal government agencies to prepare environmental assessments (EAs) and environmental impact statements (EISs) EAs and EISs contain statements of the environmental impacts of proposed federal agency actions The NEPA process includes public input in the planning and permitting of projects

NEPA Process (cont.) How does NEPA apply to the NHCC project? FRA has provided funding to the NHDOT to study intercity passenger rail service to Concord, NH from Boston, MA If the project were to be funded by the FRA, it would be a federal action subject to NEPA FRA Tier 1 Environmental Assessment (EA) for intercity service For this study the FRA is the lead agency and FTA is a cooperating agency

NEPA Process (cont.) FTA Supplement Environmental Information from previous study to include Nashua to Manchester transit options Appropriate environmental documentation to follow if a transit project moves forward

NEPA Process (cont.) Public input sought tonight: Intercity Passenger Rail with Existing Bus Transit System (Commuter Rail and Bus Options) Social, economic, or environmental impact Alternatives and measures which might avoid, minimize and/or mitigate adverse environmental impacts

MBTA Commuter Rail: Thirty Five Years of Expansion

Commuter Rail Service Options Weekday Revenue Trains Route Miles Station Wkday Train Miles Lowell Nashua Manch Concord Options 1. Concord Regional 44 30 8 8 73 14 1,957 2. Concord Commuter 44 26 22 18 73 14 2,374 3. Manchester Regional 44 34 16 0 56 13 2,068 4. Manchester Commuter 44 30 20 0 56 13 2,091 5. Nashua Commuter 44 34 0 0 39 11 1,888 6. Nashua Minimum 44 16 0 0 35 11 1,496

Conceptual Stations Station Miles to Boston Max Time to Boston Min Time to Boston Concord 73.4 1:54 1:46 Manchester 55.5 1:32 1:25 MHT / Bedford 50.1 1:24 1:17 Nashua 38.8 1:14 1:02 South Nashua 35.2 1:08 0:54

Intercity Rail Service Options Options Weekday Revenue Trains Route Nashua Manchester Concord Miles Stations Wkday Train Miles 1. Intercity 8 8 8 8 73 12 2,038 2. Intercity 12 12 12 12 73 12 2,332 3. Intercity 18 18 18 18 73 12 2,771

Conceptual Intercity Stations Stations Miles to Boston Intercity Time to Boston Min CR Time to Boston Max CR Time to Boston Concord 73.4 1:36 1:46 1:54 Manchester 55.5 1:22 1:25 1:32 MHT / Bedford 50.1 1:09 1:17 1:24 Nashua 38.8 0:56 1:02 1:14 Lowell 25.5 0:38 0:44 0:49

Potential Station Locations Primary Criteria Market (Nashua, Manchester, Concord) Access (Major highways, exits, local roads) Track Characteristics (straight track, sidings) Land Use (residential, commercial, industrial) Lot Size/Configuration Secondary Criteria Environmental (wetlands, river, habitat) Ownership (State or private) Sensitive Receptors (residential, schools, hospital) Miscellaneous Factors

Concord Stickney Avenue

Manchester Spring Street

Manchester Granite Street

MHT Ray Wieczorek Drive

Nashua Crown Street

Nashua Spit Brook Road

Nashua Pheasant Lane Mall

Potential Layover Sites Primary Criteria Terminus (Nashua, Manchester, Concord) Track Characteristics (straight track, sidings, existing rail yard) Land Use (Residential, commercial, industrial) Sensitive Receptors (residential, schools, hospital) Secondary Criteria Environmental (wetlands, river, habitat) Ownership (State or private) Misc. Factors

Concord Stickney Avenue

Manchester Granite Street

Manchester - Cemetery

Manchester Cemetery (cont.)

Manchester Wastewater Treatment Plant

Manchester Wastewater Treatment Plant (cont.)

Nashua Spit Brook Road

Express Bus Options Bus on Shoulder for Existing Service 80 weekday buses 8 12 minute savings for 16 am peak southbound buses Afternoon savings are less Bus on Shoulder for Enhanced Service Approximately 120 weekday buses 8 12 minute peak savings over current travel times 30 minute peak headway; 60 minute off peak All peak buses offer non stop service to Boston

Rail Ridership Up to 3,100 total boardings per weekday Boston Manchester 16 trains to Manchester 34 trains to Nashua Existing bus service on I 93

MBTA Boardings by Station

Bus on Shoulder Ridership Up to 1200 boarding per weekday Expanded BoS Service

Benefits/Objectives Address the congestion issue at southern end of the corridor, thereby reducing trip times and providing a wider set of alternatives to the automobile. Improve access to higher paying jobs in greater Boston. Commute from New Hampshire; return money to New Hampshire. Improve access to other tourism, recreation and cultural attractions in both greater Boston and in New Hampshire. Attract and retain population in New Hampshire, especially younger, highly educated professionals.

Benefits/Objectives Build that employee base to attract new businesses and grow existing ones in New Hampshire. Promote concentrated development (TOD) to mitigate sprawl development patterns, help accommodate residents seeking additional lifestyle choices and to reduce vehicle miles travelled. Attract federal transportation investment dollars by leveraging existing transportation infrastructure. Improve the potential for additional rail freight business. Provide additional transit service to the Manchester Boston Regional Airport.

Alternative Definition and Selection: What Makes a Big Difference Rail capital costs are much greater than bus Land use/development/tod Bus, rail both can have development impacts just very different Ridership Stronger markets closer to Boston Park and ride vs. center city stations; importance of drive access Rail ridership forecasts higher than bus

Bottom Line Questions #1: What does rail do best? #2: What does express bus do best?

Bottom Line Questions #3: Can we do it all? The transit system strategy.

Bottom Line Questions #4: Can we get 50 percent of capital from the federal government?

Bottom Line Questions #5: What is the state/local annual financial requirement after federal support, fares? Illustrative alternative : Boston Manchester $8 $10 million per year Source(s): TBD

Alternatives Advanced for More Detailed Evaluation No Build: Base Bus Base Bus on Shoulder (BoS) Base Enhanced (Base+) Bus on Shoulder Enhanced (BoS+) Nashua Commuter Rail Minimum plus bus Manchester Regional Rail plus bus Concord 8 Intercity Rail plus bus Next phase: fare sensitivity analysis Next phase: ridership system sensitivity Next phase: phased in implementation

Next Steps

Project Implementation

http://www.nhcapitolcorridor.com/ NH Capitol Corridor Study