BOAST. West Coast. Set to open this spring, the tallest building on the West Coast resists wind and seismic drifts with massive braces.

Similar documents
Original Publication: International Journal of High-Rise Buildings Volume 5 Number 1

Council on Tall Buildings. and Urban Habitat

MOUNTAIN STATE BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD HEADQUARTERS

Marina Bay Sands Hotel Arch 631 Kayla Brittany Maria Michelle

CASE STUDY OF A 40 STORY BRBF BUILDING LOCATED IN LOS ANEGELES

181 Fremont San Francisco, CA. Tech Report 1 9/12/2014. Caroline Klatman Structural Option Advisor: Dr. Thomas Boothby

PEER Tall Building Seismic Design Guidelines

H y a t t C e n t e r Chicago, Illinois (71 South Wacker Drive) Structural Redesign

181 Fremont San Francisco, CA. Proposal 12/12/2014. Caroline Klatman Structural Option Advisor: Dr. Thomas Boothby

HIGH Art. A new steel art building brings its own sense of style and flair to the Stanford campus.

Frontiers in High-Rise Outrigger Design

Lateral System Analysis and Confirmation Design

Structural Engineering, Mechanics, and Materials. Preliminary Exam - Structural Design

Types Of Roofs - Vault

Council on Tall Buildings. and Urban Habitat BACKGROUND SECTION STEEL REINFORCED CONCRETE SHEAR WALL STEEL PLATE COMPOSITE SHEAR WALL

CCTV HEADQUARTERS. ARCH 631 Spring 2018 Daniel Edith Mckenzie Rafael

Alexis Pacella Structural Option Dr. Schneider Lexington II, Washington D.C. Technical Report #3 November 21,

Response of TBI case study buildings

SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF NEW PASSENGER EQUIPMENT CARS PREFACE

Steel Expansion. Located along the Grand River in

Xyston Inn. NY. Proposal. Xiaodong Jiang. Structure Option. Advisor: Dr. Linda Hanagan

FOUR. at the Fore BY RICHARD B. GARLOCK, P.E.

Council on Tall Buildings

AND Flexible. Fluid. The ability to roll with the punches helped one fabricator keep this multi-building project moving onward and upward.

Design of Tall RC Buildings: Core Supported Structures and Outrigger Braced Systems

PAT Construction Technology of High rise Building. Lateral System: Steel Building

Xyston Inn. NY. Proposal. Xiaodong Jiang. Structure Option. Advisor: Dr. Linda Hanagan

CCTV Headquarters Case Study. ARCH 631 Haowei Cheng, Peixin Dong, Xiaoying He, Zepeng Jia, Dongqi Zhu

Structural System of North-East Asia Trade Tower in Korea

Building in Beijing. Steel provides the support for two new high-profile atriums in China s capital.

TEMPERING. Tremors. San Bernardino s new courthouse features a comprehensive seismic design that minimizes life-cycle costs.

CTBUH Technical Paper

ENTRY FORM. DVASE 2014 Excellence in Structural Engineering Awards Program

181 Fremont San Francisco, California

How Beams Work, I. Statics and Strength of Materials

LIGHT-GAUGE PANELIZED WALL SYSTEMS. Michael Waggoner Mark Schroeder

September 26, 2014 Dr. Linda Hanagan Lhanagan.engr.psu.edu

Metropolis Mega-Development: A Case Study in Fast-Tracked Performance-Based Seismic Design of High-Rise Concrete Towers in Los Angeles

LPA Inc./Cris Costea Photography Inc.

Challenges and Opportunities for the Structural Design of the Jamsil Lotte World Tower

Structural Design Challenges of Merdeka PNB118, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Technical Assignment 3 December 3, 2007

ACI paper #2. Presentation Outline. Performance Based Seismic Design of Tall RC Core Wall Buildings: State of Practice on the West Coast of the U.S.

Office Building-G. Thesis Proposal. Carl Hubben. Structural Option. Advisor: Dr. Ali Memari

Lessons learned: 3.2.Stability concepts

Erie on the Park. Timothy Moore Penn State University Architectural Engineering Structural Emphasis Advisor: Prof. Ali Memari

Structural Design Challenges for Plaza 66 Tower 2

Jonathan R. Torch Thesis Proposal Columbia University. Thesis Proposal. Columbia University Northwest Science Building

MOVABLE ROOF THE DESIGN OF A STADIUM

Technical Report #1. Indiana Regional Medical Center Indiana, PA. Cody A. Scheller. Structural Concepts & Existing Conditions Report

[TECHNICAL REPORT 3] Lateral System Analysis

Optimization of Multistory Building with Multi- Outrigger System and Belts Truss

Structural Training - Part 1:

Thesis Proposal. La Jolla Commons Phase II Office Tower San Diego, California. December 13, 2013

VARIOUS TYPES OF SLABS

POINT. Making the. The highlights of High Point University s newest academic building are comprised of open volumes, and steel makes them happen.

STEEL STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS

Application of Buckling Restrained Braces in a 50-Storey Building

William W. Wilkins Professional Building Columbus, Ohio

CTBUH Technical Paper

Technical Report #1. Matthew R Peyton

HYBRID DESIGN REDUCES COSTS WHEN DESIGN FIRST BEGAN. Switching from a concrete frame to steel beams and concrete columns proved advantageous

CVEN 483. Structural System Overview

Brent Ellmann Structural Option 200 Minuteman Park, Andover, MA Structural Consultant: Dr. Hanagan

Special Delivery. A California healthcare complex takes structural engineering collaborative design and integrated project delivery to new heights.

ERECTION ANALYSIS OF THE CFST ARCH BRIDGE BY VERTICAL SWING METHOD OVER THE JING-HANG CANAL IN XUZHOU, CHINA

Ductile Design of Steel Structures

Trump Taj Mahal Hotel

Structural System Design

Park Potomac Office Building E

Third Avenue New York, NY. Structural Concepts/ Structural Existing Conditions Report September 30, Michelle L.

Innovative Building Lateral System with Strongback Frames and Mechanical Fuses

Experimental Evaluation of The Seismic Behavior of Steel- Braced RC Frames

(a) Pin-Pin P cr = (b) Fixed-Fixed P cr = (d) Fixed-Pin P cr =

Expanding the Indiana Convention

Hillside. A Site. on a Sliver of. How the design for an impressive research building on a challenging site came to be.

SECTION VIBRATION AND SEISMIC CONTROLS FOR ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS

National Truss for Historic Preservation

Thesis Proposal. Nasser Marafi. Center & Facility Service Building. St. Joseph Hospital of Orange Patient Care. Proposal

Structural Design Engineers 120 Montgomery Street, Suite 1410 San Francisco, California / Fax 415/

Structural Performance Assessment and Control of Super Tall Buildings During Construction

Danielle Shetler - Structural option Courtyard by Marriott Lancaster, PA

steelwise A Closer Look at Steel Plate Shear Walls

Example of a modelling review Roof truss

SEISMIC ISOLATION FOR STRONG, NEAR-FIELD EARTHQUAKE MOTIONS

Pioneering China s Tallest: Form and Structure of the Ping An Finance Ce nter

PEER/CSSC Tall Building Design Case Study Building #1. J. Andrew Fry John Hooper Ron Klemencic Magnusson Klemencic Associates

La Jolla Commons Phase II Office Tower

Fairfield Inn and Suites Pittsburgh, PA

Three-dimensional Exterior Bracing Systems for Tall Buildings

Third Avenue New York, NY. Lateral System Analysis and Confirmation Design November 13, Michelle L. Mentzer.

PRELIMINARY STUDY OF THE STRONGBACK SYSTEM: PREVENTING THE SOFT STORY MECHANISM. Ray Hooft University of Nevada, Reno

TECHNICAL REPORT 1. Structural Concepts / Structural Existing Conditions. Penn State Hershey Medical Center Children s Hospital. Hershey, Pennsylvania

one structural behavior, systems, and design ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2015 lecture

Brookfield Place, Perth

CASE STUDY OF LONG SPAN STEEL BRIDGE STABILITY DURING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION

OCTAGONAL SHAPE REDUCES AIRPLANE HANGAR COSTS

HIGH PERFORMANCE SELF-CONSOLIDATING CONCRETE FOR NORTH AMERICA S TALLEST REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDING: TRUMP INTERNATIONAL HOTEL AND TOWER, CHICAGO

Transcription:

Set to open this spring, the tallest building on the West Coast resists wind and seismic drifts with massive braces. AC Martin West Coast BOAST BY GERARD M. NIEBLAS, SE AC Martin Wilshire Grand is expected to open this spring. Gerard M. Nieblas, (gnieblas@bjsce.com) is president of Brandow Johnston, Inc. CHECKING IN AT THE WILSHIRE GRAND in downtown Los Angeles is slightly more involved than checking in at a typical hotel. That s because the lobby is at the top of the 73-story building, which also houses office space. When it opens this spring, it will be the tallest building west of Chicago at 1,100 ft. Outstanding Outriggers The building uses a structural steel frame to carry the gravity loads and a concrete shear wall core that serves as the lateral system. It incorporates 19,000 tons of structural steel for about 2,000,000 sq. ft of enclosed space, making the structural steel weight approximately 19 lb per sq. ft. The tower sits atop a five-story podium and five levels of underground parking. A sail-like crown using 900 tons of steel and an architectural spire using 124 tons top the building, which is expected to achieve LEED Silver certification. It is the first building high-rise in downtown L.A. to be constructed without a flat roof.

Because the structure is so tall and slender, it was necessary to introduce steel outriggers to resist the wind and seismic overturning and to provide rigidity for wind and seismic drifts. In the transverse direction the core wall is 30 ft wide and approximately 895 ft tall. As the concrete creeps and shrinks, the steel BRBs (buckling restrained braces) are pulled downward in tension, pushing down on the exterior building columns over time. The tower employs 40 2,200-kip BRB outriggers at the lower levels (28 to 31), 120 800-kip BRB outriggers in the middle levels (52 to 58) and 10 2,200-kip BRB outriggers in the upper levels (71 to 73). Each BRB weighs roughly 19.5 tons and they are positioned four per joint, resulting in a capacity of 8,800 kips at 10 different points. The BRBs, which act as seismic fuses in the event of an earthquake, at the lower levels are all 42 ft long and span from the exterior wall into the core wall. The bottom connection for each consists of a 7½-in.-diameter pinned clevis into 2¾-in.-thick gusset plates, and the top connections are 1½-in. A490 bolts through 1½-in.-thick splice plates over 2-in. gusset/core plates. The building also has two three-story-tall belt trusses around the perimeter at the lower and upper outrigger levels. These belt trusses increase torsional stiffness in the structure, distribute vertical loads more uniformly around the perimeter of the structure and add redundancy to the structural system. A sail-like crown using 900 tons of steel and an architectural spire using 124 tons top the building. Schuff Steel had plywood mockups made of the BRBs and gussets in order to verify bolting access in tight quarters. Schuff The tower supersedes US Bank Tower (at right) as the tallest building in Los Angeles. Tower Elevation with BRBs. BRBs with flat jacks at 73rd floor. Modern STEEL CONSTRUCTION

Schuff BRB installation. A sketch of the deflected tower shape. The BRBs at the lower levels are all 42 ft long, and the upper BRBs are approximately 52 ft long. Electro-slag welding was incorporated for AWS D1.8 demand-critical welds at the lower BRB levels, something that had never been done as a field application in high-rise construction. This required many rounds of procedure qualification records and demonstrations to prove that the application would work. All lower belt truss chords and braces (W14 members), as well as the gusset plates for BRB connections to the core wall embeds, were welded using this process. These gusset plates were over 12 ft tall and 2½ in. thick and were each welded only a few hours after setting up the joint. Early in the design process, the team investigated using conventional brace elements as part of the outrigger system. However, this proved to be too heavy-handed a solution. Conventional wide-flange braces would have been too massive in terms of thickness to withstand the buckling effect in compression much larger than necessary when controlled by tension forces. In addition, conventional braces for the outrigger system would have resulted in larger connections, as the braces would have been

A temporary cantilevered steel structure supported the tower crane on the building s north side, so the crane wouldn t be required to land on the sidewalk/street. A view of the building from 7th Street. sized based on compression but the connections would have been sized based on tension, resulting in more unpredictable jamb forces on the outrigger columns. BRBs were selected so that brace areas could be sized based on tension instead of compression, which resulted in less demanding connections to the core wall and outrigger columns and smaller, more predictable jamb forces to the outrigger columns. The BRBs serve as a fuse for the vertical wind and seismic jamb forces and provide a consistent, predictable load to the foundation. The upper outrigger BRBs are attached near the top of the core wall and are therefore the most sensitive to the differential movement between the shrinkage, creep and elastic shortening of the core wall and the elastic shortening of the structural steel box columns. An extensive study conducted to approximate the anticipated total creep and shrinkage in the core wall also included a yearlong creep and shrinkage testing program of the proposed concrete mix with a shrinkage-reducing admixture. A core wall construction sequence analysis was required to evaluate the force transfers based on a construction schedule provided by the contractor. Pre-Compression Since the concrete core wall is so thick, it takes an extremely long time for all the drying shrinkage to occur. For example, at the bottom third of the structure the core wall is 48 in. thick. It will take approximately 54 years to achieve 75% of the drying shrinkage for a wall of this thickness. To mitigate the large tensile force transfer in the braces due to the core wall shortening, the team jacked each of the upper BRBs with a pre-compression force of 1,000 kips. Four flat jacks were placed at the top of each BRB at the 73rd floor. The jacking force was measured by hydraulic pressure in the lines and by measuring Modern STEEL CONSTRUCTION

BRBs were selected so that brace areas could be sized based on tension instead of compression, which resulted in less demanding connections to the core wall and outrigger columns. The team jacked each of the upper BRBs with a pre-compression force of 1,000 kips. Schuff the compression strains in each of the braces. Alternate sides of the building were jacked in ¼-in. increments over the course of a day. Once approximately ½ in. of compressive strain was placed into each BRB, they were locked off with bolted connections. The primary reason for this compression jacking was to protect the structure from permanent tensile deformation in a 50-year wind event or short-term moderate seismic event. The reason the pre-compression is so effective is because the tensile/compression strains on the BRBs are not equal. For the maximum considered earthquake (MCE) the compression strains are on average six times more than the tensile strains. The BRB strains are approximately 50% of yield strain for the 50-year wind event, and pre-compressing these braces eliminates permanent deformations after 50 years of creep and shrinkage. After jacking 500 tons of compression into the 10 braces, the 10 exterior building columns went into tension as the braces pushed upward on the perimeter of the structure. The 73rd floor at the perimeter of the structure rose vertically ½ in., with each floor below rising slightly less to the middle outrigger level, and the perimeter columns were in tension to the middle outrigger level exactly as planned. Owner/Developer Hanjin Group, Seoul, South Korea Architect AC Martin Partners, Los Angeles General Contractor Turner Construction Co., Los Angeles Structural Engineer Brandow and Johnston, Inc., Los Angeles Performance-Based Design Consultant Thornton Tomasetti, Los Angeles Steel Team Fabricator and Erector Schuff Steel, San Diego Detailer BDS VirCon, Brisbane, Australia The building incorporates 19,000 tons of structural steel to frame about 2,000,000 sq. ft of enclosed space.