Dry spring weather conditions have created critical conditions in Arizona s forests

Similar documents
Bark Beetles in California: Are your trees susceptible? Danny Cluck Forest Entomologist US Forest Service Forest Health Protection

Managing Mountain Pine Beetle (MPB) Attacking Urban And Shelterbelt Trees In Montana. Signs And Symptoms Of Mountain Pine Beetle Attack

Engraver Beetles in Southwestern Pines

Drought, Tree Mortality, Insects and Diseases. Donald R. Owen California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection

Wildfire Damage Assessment for the West Mims Fire By: Chip Bates Forest Health Coordinator, Georgia Forestry Commission

USDA Forest Service Northeastern Area State & Private Forestry

TREE NOTES. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION Arnold Schwarzenegger Governor State of California. Dale T.

Tree Mortality in the Sierra Nevada

Tree Survey of Wrightwood, CA 3/1/2018

PINE BARK BEETLES IN URBAN AREAS

2016 Yosemite West Hazardous Fuel Reduction Project

2013 Cannon Envirothon Forestry Test 2 nd Draft - 9/12 55 questions 100 points

Pinus species. Propagation. Pests and Diseases. Borers (flathead borers, roundhead borers)

The Southern Pine Beetle: Kier D. Klepzig, USDA Forest Service

Guide to Bark Beetles Affecting Ponderosa Pine Trees Detection and Management

Guidelines for Thinning Ponderosa

Lodgepole Pine Beetle

ASSESSING TREE HEALTH FS055E. By Kevin W. Zobrist, WSU Extension Forestry Educator, WSU Extension. FS055E Page 1 ext.wsu.edu

EMERALD ASH BORER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE CITY OF MONROE

State Forester Forum P I N E E N G R A V E R

Working Together British Columbia s Spruce Beetle Mitigation Strategy

Report 01-5 March DOUGLAS-FIR BEETLE POPULATION ASSESSMENT IDAHO PANHANDLE NATIONAL FORESTS, 2000 Sandra Kegley and Tim McConnell.

Impacts & patterns of recent bark beetle outbreaks in the Southwest

CLASSIFICATION OF BEETLE-ATTACKED TREES MOUNTAIN PINE BEETLE

Mountain Pine Beetle Management in Alberta

A.J Waters & Associates Inc. Use of Pheromone Baited Funnel Traps to Manage Douglas-fir Bark Beetles on Woodlot Licence 1413

Synergies, feedbacks and tipping points: mountain pine beetle s rapid range expansion threatens invasion of North American boreal pine forests

Pines, Drought, & Bark beetle complex in Mariposa and Madera Counties. Beverly M. Bulaon USDA Forest Service South Sierra Shared Service Area

Hyde Park Hyde Park Wildland Urban Interface Project. Scoping Information February 2017

Q&A: Omineca spruce beetle outbreak May 4, 2018

Activities of forest insects and diseases on the San Juan National Forest for 2015

Appendix A (Project Specifications) Patton Mill Fuel Break Project

REFORESTATION AFTER HARVEST

Forest Health Highlights 2015

THE SAN DIEGO DECLARATION ON CLIMATE CHANGE AND FIRE MANAGEMENT

Dwarf Mistletoe Biology and Management in Southeast Region

VERMONT. Forest Health Programs in the Northeast. Forest Resource Summary. Forest Land Ownership

North Shore Tree Concerns. Brian Schwingle Forest Insect & Disease Specialist Minnesota DNR

1. Protect against wildfires 2. Enhance wildlife habitat 3. Protect watersheds 4. Restore plant communities. Ford Ridge Project Area (pre-treatment)

2.4 MANAGING FOR HIGH-VALUE TREES

Community Wildfire Hazard Risk Assessment Sun Country Cle Elum, WA

January Symptoms and Reporting Suspects

USDA FOREST SERVICE/NORTHERN REGION. Report No April 1973

Fire ecology of ponderosa pine

Mapping Mountain Pine Beetle and White Pine Blister Rust in White Bark Pine on the Helena National Forest

MOUNTAIN PINE BEETLE Dendroctonus ponderosae. DISTRIBUTION: Throughout the range of its principal host.

Lessons Learned from the Emerald Ash Borer (EAB) Jim Zwack, M.S. Director of Technical Services The Davey Tree Expert Company

Colorado Front Range Fire Study Questions Conventional Wisdom about Fire Regimes

2015 Insect and Disease Update for Rocky Mountain. Region

Aerial Survey Highlights for Colorado, 2016

The forest beetles. you need to know about. The Southern Pine Beetle. Perspective Bark beetles Perspective Bark beetles

FOREST MANAGEMENT Ill Thinning

Delayed Conifer Tree Mortality Following Fire in California

Oak and Tanoak Pest Issues. Tom Smith Forest Pest Management California Department of Forestry and Fire protection

Spruce problem diagnosis for yard trees. by Jana and Mike Albers, MNDNR Division of Forestry

Walton Lake Restoration Project

EVALUATION OF A MOUNTAIN PINE BEETLE INFESTATION IN SECOND-GROWTH PONDEROSA PINE ON THE CROW INDIAN RESERVATION, MONTANA, 1979 ABSTRACT

Fir Engraver George T. Ferrell 1

Kansas State University Extension Entomology Newsletter

6.3 DOUGLAS-FIR BEETLE ATTACK AND TREE MORTALITY FOLLOWING WILDFIRE Sharon M. Hood 1 *, Barbara Bentz 2, and Kevin C. Ryan 1.

HORTICULTURE CONSULTANTS INC. 221 Misty Garden St. Henderson NV Telephone: Fax:

Tree Timeline. Tree story cards begin on page 3.

A Pictorial Comparison of Seasonal Timing and Frequency of Prescribed Fire in Longleaf Pine Stands

SILVICULTURE SILVICULTURE 10/8/2018. Ecological forestry (Ecosystem management)

You are the steward of your land! Pine beetles are changing the look of forests throughout the West. Although the forests will recover, many property

Dear Interested Party:

Fire Susceptibility in Oregon

EMERALD ASH BORER WHAT EVERY MUNICIPALITY SHOULD KNOW ASPLUNDH TREE EXPERT CO.

Bark Beetles (Continued)

HAZARD DESCRIPTION... 1 LOCATION AND HISTORICAL...

Forest Health Program

These symptoms are very similar to the Pine Engraver (Ips) beetle; be sure to properly identify the beetles you find on your tree.

Timber Stand Improvements. What is TSI? Why do TSI? FWF 312- Silviculture November, 2005

Forest Storm Damage Factsheet. Washington State Department of Natural Resources August 2012

City of Rutland EAB Strategy

Western Spruce Budworm Management Strategies

Proper Mulching Techniques. Benefits of Proper Mulching

PRESERVING + PROTECTING VEGETATION DURING CONSTRUCTION

What s that?! You have learned a little bit about emerald ash borer and want to put your knowledge to the test!

Landscape-level biomass opportunities

Introduction to Tree Trimming

REFINING A PLAN OF ATTACK

Jeffrey Fidgen and Tom Eckberg Idaho Department of Lands, Coeur d Alene Idaho Forest Products Commission Meeting McCall, ID

San Bernardino National Forest Supervisor's Office

Timber Stand Improvements TSI

Presented by: Captain Frank Bigelow, CAL FIRE January 09, 2016

Forest Health Highlights 2016

Emerald Ash Borer: Background & Overview of the Green Menace NATHAN W. SIEGERT, PH.D. FOREST ENTOMOLOGIST

Silviculture Lab 5: Pine Silviculture & Natural Regen Page 1 of 6

Title: Bugs & Burns: Effects of Fire on Ponderosa Pine Bark Beetle

WILLOW BASIN WILDLAND URBAN INTERFACE FUELS TREATMENT PROJECT Manti-La Sal National Forest Moab Ranger District

Lessons learned in modeling forest responses to climate change

Notice is hereby given that bids will be received by the Unit Manager, GLADWIN MANAGEMENT UNIT, for certain timber on the following described lands:

Soapberry Borer Infestations Found in 33 Counties in Texas. By Ronald Billings and Herbert (Joe) Pase III Texas Forest Service

Emerald Ash Borer Plan

EMERALD ASH BORER MANAGEMENT PLAN

Emerald Ash Borer (EAB) Management Plan December 2006

Fighting drought with fire: Can forest management increase resistance to drought?

New Mexico Forest Restoration Principles Preamble Participants Principles Collaborate Reduce the threat of unnatural crown fire.

M. D. McGregor, D. R. Hamel, R. C. Lood, and H. E. Meyer ABSTRACT

Transcription:

For Immediate Release: Pine Bark Beetle Outbreak in Arizona June 23, 2004 Written by: Tom DeGomez, Forest Health Specialist, with the University of Arizona Cooperative Extension Forest Health Working Group and the Arizona Bark Beetle Task Force which includes professionals from University of Arizona, Northern Arizona University, United States Forest Service, Arizona State Land Department, & Arizona Public Service Dry spring weather conditions have created critical conditions in Arizona s forests and woodlands. Below normal winter precipitation coupled with normally dry conditions in May and June have increased the susceptibility of Arizona s ponderosa pine and piñon forest to forest health problems. Bark beetles have emerged in the forest and woodlands of Arizona. The offspring from over-wintered adult beetles that have successfully attacked live trees and slash in late 2003 are beginning to emerge as the first generation of 2004 adults. At all elevations, populations of Ips bark beetles are higher than normal. What may determine whether or not we have increases in bark beetle killed trees this year is the weather. Moisture levels in the fall/winter (November to April) of 2001-2002 were 6.9 inches below normal (average precipitation for Flagstaff, Prescott and Show Low), leading to the death of millions of trees in 2002. In contrast, precipitation levels during the fall/winter of 2002/2003 and 2003/2004 were 2.3 and 2.4 inches below normal, respectively. Thus the past two years have had very similar dry fall/winter weather patterns. Fire managers are experiencing more intense fire behavior this year in many areas in vegetation where insect and drought killed trees exist. Because of these burning

conditions, firefighters are utilizing fire suppression and management tactics to ensure the safety of firefighters while minimizing the impacts to these fragile ecosystems. Even with below normal levels of precipitation this year most of our forests had sufficient amounts of moisture in the soil on May 1. However, when over-wintering beetles were emerging soil moisture became depleted very quickly due to persistent dry, windy spring weather. With these past and present conditions in mind it is hard to predict the level of bark beetle damage that will occur in 2004. We can, however, assume that similar weather patterns will bring similar levels of tree mortality. The last three years of U.S. Forest Service and University of Arizona aerial survey flights have shown a significant increase in bark beetle-caused tree mortality compared to levels prior to 2001. The 2003 survey showed the greatest number of acres affected. In reality, the 2003 survey, due to timing of the 2002 flights, recorded 100,000 s of impacted acres that were actually damaged in late summer and fall of 2002. With this in mind we could expect to see significant levels of beetle related pine mortality in the 2004 survey results. Damage levels will depend to some degree on weather patterns throughout the remainder of the summer. As more and more trees are killed by bark beetles there will be fewer trees to be attacked in subsequent years. The surviving trees will have increased vigor due to less competition and be less susceptible to attack. If we see fewer acres affected in 2004 it may be due to the fact that many of the weak stands of trees that were growing on highly susceptible sites (south slopes, lower elevation, or poorer soils) have already been severely damaged. This may be true in areas such as Crown King, Pine, or Prescott that have experienced over 50% mortality in many ponderosa stands during the last two years.

As Mike Wagner, Regents Professor at Northern Arizona University was heard to say about the lower levels of mortality in some of the stands that had high outbreak conditions in 2002, you can t kill a tree twice! Although the last significant bark beetle outbreak in Arizona occurred in the 1950 s, unfortunately we have not been able to make conclusions on how the 50 s outbreak relates to the current one. Recent outbreaks in other parts of the country are not comparable because of the different species of beetles, and climatic conditions. Based on historical records, Ips outbreaks are relatively short lived and rarely sustained for long periods of time. However, because of the ongoing record drought and unprecedented tree densities in our forests and woodlands, we are entering uncharted territory. For these reasons it is very difficult to predict how successful the beetles will be this year or the next few years. The best way to avoid having trees attacked by bark beetles is to take preventive measures. First and foremost, lower tree density through thinning. However, at this time of year thinning may cause increases in bark beetle populations due to the beetle s ability to utilize thinning residue or slash. Beetle attacks may occur in standing trees nearby thinning treatments if the newly cut trees are left on the ground for more that 30 days. If the material is hauled off the property to a landfill where the material will be buried or if it is chipped within 30 days it will not cause a problem. When chipping on site, don t pile the chips next to live trees as the chips may attract bark beetles. Keep chip piles in the open sun and as far from live trees as possible. If slash removal or chipping is not an option, then it may be best to wait until October to begin thinning.

Many people are unsure as to which trees should be removed. In these cases it may be best to consult with a certified forester or arborist. For a listing of certified professionals consult the yellow pages, call your local University of Arizona County Extension office, or log on to www.isa-arbor.com to find a certified arborist or www.safnet.org/certified/directory.htm to find a certified forester. The small slash (limbs and tops less than 3 inches in diameter) can be used by adult beetles, but they won t produce much brood from it. The small material can be chipped or piled. When piling, put the smallest diameter material in the middle with the largest on the outside. Often property owners will have several trees that have significant value in their landscape. These trees may be prized for their size or location. These high value trees can be given additional care to prevent infestation. They can be irrigated or sprayed with preventative insecticides. When irrigating native pine trees they should be given enough water to wet the soil at least two feet deep. The water should be applied in a donut shaped pattern at the drip-line or outer edge of the trees branches. It generally takes about 2 of rain to soak 2 feet deep. Check the soil 6 to 8 inches deep just outside the drip-line of the trees monthly. If the soil is dry, then water. Generally, the months that most often warrant watering are May, June, and October. However, depending on weather patterns watering may be needed any month of the year. If current dry conditions continue into the summer you may need to irrigate in early July. Keep in mind watering restrictions that may be in effect in your community and follow those guidelines as well. (Check with your local office of the Arizona Department of Water Resources for restrictions in your area.)

Applications of fertilizers will not help protect trees from the effects of drought, and will not protect against bark beetle attacks. Fertilizers may even hinder the ability of the trees to fight off bark beetles. Fertilizers often cause trees to put on extra growth, this growth will require higher levels of moisture to maintain healthy conditions. Fertilizers may also burn foliage if improperly applied. Un-infested trees can be protected from beetle attacks by spraying with insecticides. When spraying, the entire trunk and the base of large branches 4 or more in diameter must be soaked. Spraying large trees is generally not a practice that homeowners can do themselves. To locate a certified pesticide applicator call the Arizona Structural Pesticide Control Commission at 800-223-0618. The currently recommended chemicals for this purpose are carbaryl and permethrin. You must use a product that is especially formulated for bark beetles, such as Sevin SL, Dragnet, Premethrin Plus C, or Astro. This is a protective measure only, it will not kill beetles once they enter the tree. Typical home and garden products containing carbaryl or permethrin that are not formulated for bark beetles will be ineffective. Correct materials when applied properly can be effective for an entire season. Spraying should have been completed prior to April 1 to ensure a full season of protection. Spraying after April 1 can be effective but you must be sure that the trees have not already been attacked. Trees can be checked for infestations by climbing, with a hydraulic lift, or with high-powered binoculars to inspect the entire trunk of the tree for pitch tubes and boring dust. Also check the bark crevices and the base of the tree for fresh boring dust. Spraying trees already infested is ineffective.

The only known direct control method for infested trees is the removal of the infested trees. A good rule to remember is If the tree is brown cut it down, if in doubt cut it out. If we leave dead trees standing, we run the risk of the new generation of beetles leaving the tree and attacking more trees. Finding reddish-brown boring dust in the bark crevices of a tree indicates that the tree has been successfully attacked, and the tree should be cut down even if the tree is still green at that point. If dead trees are next to houses or other structures, they can become a hazard tree. Insecticide injections or systemics have not proven effective against Dendroctonus species of bark beetles in studies conducted by U.S. Forest Service and Canadian Forestry Service researchers. We are assuming that chemical injections will be equally ineffective on Ips species of bark beetles. Many trees have been injected with what seemed to be success. What may have happened is that the treated tree successfully pitched out the attacking beetle with resin prior to the treatment. The tree was then injected with insecticide when in fact no beetles were actually in the tree. The tree saved itself! We repeat, studies have shown that injecting chemicals will not kill Dendroctonus species of bark beetles attacking conifers and injures the tree in the process. There are several miracle cures being promoted to save trees from bark beetles. These materials may not have gone through extensive research to test their effectiveness. Buyer beware! Often, if what is being marketed sounds too good to be true it generally doesn t live up to its billing. Remember, it is against the law to use unregistered pesticides and using pesticides for insects not listed on the label is unwise. The University of Arizona, Northern Arizona University, and U.S. Forest Service are engaged in research to test materials to prevent and control Ips species of bark beetles

in northern Arizona. When these studies are completed and reviewed the results will be released to the public as soon as possible. Many trees may only have the top half of the tree dead. In 2002 we saw the lower half of the tree was killed shortly thereafter. Do not cut the top out of the tree hoping that the rest of the tree will recover. It is best to remove such trees to prevent the spread of beetles to other trees and to prevent them from becoming a hazard tree. You need not wait until the entire tree turns brown, many adult beetles may have flown from the tree before turning brown. Dead trees that do not have bark beetles in them and do not pose a safety hazard can be left in the forest to be used by wildlife. Remember, the most effective method for preventing bark beetle infestations is to thin overly dense stands of trees in the right way, at the right time of year, using the right equipment with proper training. If you need more information please contact your local University of Arizona Cooperative Extension office, State Land Department, or your local fire department. Additional information can be found at the following web sites. http://ag.arizona.edu/extension/fh/ or http://ag.arizona.edu/yavapai/ Contact: Tom DeGomez, Forest Health Specialist University of Arizona 928-523-8385 degomez@ag.arizona.edu