Winter U.S. Natural Gas Production and Supply Outlook

Similar documents
Winter U.S. Natural Gas Production and Supply Outlook

Natural Gas Issues and Emerging Trends for the Upcoming Winter and Beyond

Natural Gas Abundance: The Development of Shale Resource in North America

Trends, Issues and Market Changes for Crude Oil and Natural Gas

AIChE: Natural Gas Utilization Workshop Overcoming Hurdles of Technology Implementation

U.S. Historical and Projected Shale Gas Production

Shale Gas - Transforming Natural Gas Flows and Opportunities. Doug Bloom President, Spectra Energy Transmission West October 18, 2011

2005 North American Natural Gas Outlook Client Presentation

Ponzi Scheme Keeps US Market Well Supplied

The Really Big Game Changer: Crude Oil Production from Shale Resources and the Tuscaloosa Marine Shale

Outlook for Natural Gas Supply and Demand for Winter

Natural Gas Outlook and Drivers

A Decade of Progress in Unconventional Gas

North American Midstream Infrastructure Through 2035 A Secure Energy Future. Press Briefing June 28, 2011

Wood Mackenzie Gas Market Outlook

North America Midstream Infrastructure through 2035: Capitalizing on Our Energy Abundance

North American Natural Gas: A Crisis Ahead Or Is Chicken Little Running Around Again?

Oil and natural gas: market outlook and drivers

ENERGY SLIDESHOW. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas

A Tale of Two Fuels - Crude Oil and Natural Gas Supply. Private Capital Conference February 24, 2011 Houston, TX

ENERGY SLIDESHOW. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas

ENERGY OUTLOOK 2017 FALL/WINTER

Short Term Energy Outlook March 2011 March 8, 2011 Release

Gas Shales Drive the Unconventional Gas Revolution

The Implications of Lower Natural Gas Prices for the Electric Generation Mix in the Southeast 1

The Shifting Sands of Natural Gas Abundance

The Energy Consortium Recent Developments and the Outlook for Natural Gas in the Northeast. John R. Bitler October 20, 2010

U.S. Shale Gas in Context

IAF Advisors Energy Market Outlook Kyle Cooper, (713) , March 6, 2015

OIL AND GAS OUTLOOK: HOW ARE THE ENERGY MARKET AFFECTING METALS? Nicole Leonard, Project Manager, Oil & Gas Consulting Services November 2015

Major Changes in Natural Gas Transportation Capacity,

North American Gas: The New Big Picture. Jen Snyder North America Gas Research Wood Mackenzie 2010 Summer Seminar August 2, 2010

We ve Seen This Movie Before

CERI Commodity Report Natural Gas

U.S. Natural Gas and the Potential for LNG Export Growth

CERI Commodity Report Natural Gas

World and U.S. Oil and Gas Production and Price Outlook: To Infinity (or at least 2050) and Beyond

CenterPoint Energy Services. Current Market Fundamentals June 27, 2013

North American Natural Gas Market Outlook

Natural Gas Market Update

U.S. Natural Gas and the Poten3al for LNG Export Growth

An INDEPENDENT energy consulting company since 1996 No affiliation with any marketer, broker, agent, utility, pipeline or producer.

CERI Commodity Report Natural Gas

The Unconventional Reservoirs Revolution and the Rebirth of the U.S. Onshore Oil & Gas Industry

Wyoming Pipeline Authority Public Meeting. Anne Swedberg, Manager, North American Power and Gas Content

What s Going on With Energy? How Unconventional Oil & Gas Development is Impacting Renewables, Efficiency, Power Markets and All That Other Stuff

NEXUS Gas Transmission

Gas and Crude Oil Production Outlook

Oil and gas outlook. For New York Energy Forum October 15, 2015 New York, NY. By Adam Sieminski, Administrator. U.S. Energy Information Administration

Status and outlook for shale gas and tight oil development in the U.S.

IAF Advisors Energy Market Outlook Kyle Cooper, (713) , October 31, 2014

U.S. Crude Oil, Natural Gas, and NG Liquids Proved Reserves

UNDERSTANDING NATURAL GAS MARKETS. Mohammad Naserifard MSc student of Oil & Gas Economics at PUT Fall 2015

Navigating the Uncertainties in the North American Gas Market

Navigating through the energy landscape.

By Bob Hugman and Harry Vidas

SHALE DEVELOPMENT TRENDS AND IMPLICATIONS ON VALVE NEEDS JOHN D. SELDENRUST, VICE PRESIDENT-ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION

CERI Commodity Report Natural Gas

2010 Annual Winter Reliability Assessment Meeting November 4, Carlos Thillet Manager Gas Supply and Transportation PECO Energy Company

North American Gas: A dynamic environment. Josh McCall BP North American Gas and Power November 16, 2011

API Industry Outlook. Third Quarter R. Dean Foreman, Ph.D. Great Plains and EmPower ND Energy Conference October 8, 2018.

Global energy markets

Natural Gas. Smarter Power Today. Perspectives on the Future of Regulatory Policy Illinois State University. Springfield, IL October 25, 2012

Energizing America: Facts for Addressing Energy Policy. Rayola Dougher API Senior Economic Advisor,

Drilling Deeper: A Reality Check on U.S. Government Forecasts for a Lasting Tight Oil & Shale Gas Boom. Web Briefing December 9, 2014

C9-19. Slide 1. markets later in the presentation.

U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Year-end 2016

Energy Market Outlook

Natural Gas, Liquids and Crude Oil Market Outlook North America 2012 and Beyond

Energy Market Outlook

Connecting Supply Options GasMart May 21, 2008, Chicago

The Woodford Shale. Presenter Name: Sam Langford

Shale Gas and the Outlook for U.S. Natural Gas Markets and Global Gas Resources

U.S. natural gas and LNG exports

SAMPLE. US Shale. Insight Report

Energy Market Outlook

AEO2005 Overview. Key Energy Issues to Economic Growth

Greg Hathaway Energy Source Holdings, LLC

Oil. Gas. Market Notes. North American Natural Gas Market Outlook Year-End 2014: A View to Contents

POTENTIAL GAS COMMITTEE REPORTS INCREASE IN MAGNITUDE OF U.S. NATURAL GAS RESOURCE BASE

Natural Gas Supply Issues: Gulf Coast Supply Trends and Implications for Louisiana

Performance of Industry Shale Plays. Rob Sutton February 23, 2010

Gulf Coast Energy Outlook

Western Oklahoma Residue Takeaway Impact of Growing SCOOP/STACK Supply

Energy Markets. U.S. Energy Information Administration. for Center on Global Energy Policy, Columbia University November 20, 2015 New York, New York

Overview. Key Energy Issues to Economic Growth

Energy Market Outlook

October 23, 2018 Harrisburg, PA

Energy Market Outlook

Unconventional Oil & Gas: Reshaping Energy Markets

Energy Market Outlook

Garth Johnson Vice President, Pipeline & Strategic Development

Energy Markets. U.S. Energy Information Administration. for. October 29, 2015 Golden, Colorado. by Adam Sieminski, Administrator

Platts Natural Gas Storage Conference. January 2012

Gary Weilinger, Vice President, Strategic Development and External Affairs September 8, 2011

ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY BULLETIN

Delivering Supply Options LDC Forum June 1, 2008, Boston. Tim Stringer Manager, U.S. Northeast Markets

U.S. Natural Gas A Decade of Change and the Emergence of the Gas-Centric Future

The Impact of Developing Energy and Environmental Policy on the Gas Industry Plus Impacts of the Current Economic State

Energy Market Outlook

Transcription:

Winter 2010-11 U.S. Natural Gas Production and Supply Outlook Prepared for Natural Gas Supply Association by: ICF International Fairfax, Virginia September, 2010 Introduction This report presents ICF s current view of trends and forecasts of upstream industry activity, production and imports for the upcoming winter heating season. It also discusses regional production trends and exploration plays that will be important in the longer-term. Recent years have seen large changes in North American gas development activity. The greatest change has been a shift toward onshore unconventional gas (tight gas, shale gas, and coalbed methane). Initially, this was focused on tight gas and coalbed methane. Since 2007, there has been a rapid emergence and expansion of horizontal shale gas development. There have also been large swings in drilling activity related to the U.S. economy. The U.S. experienced one of the worst recessions and credit crises in history starting in late 2008. The economic impact on demand combined with abundant shale supply resulted in a sharp decline in drilling in 2009. With the continuing gradual recovery of the U.S. economy, drilling activity has increased in 2010, driven primarily by horizontal shale gas and tight gas. In recent months wellhead prices have been in the $4.00 -$5.00 per MMBtu range at Henry Hub, Louisiana. Despite low wellhead gas prices, U.S. rig counts and gas completion activity in the U.S. have increased substantially since reaching a low of 893 rigs in June, 2009. The current rig count (late August) is 1

approximately 1650 rigs, including 985 gas-directed rigs and 665 oil or miscellaneous rigs. Most of the new activity is horizontal shale activity and vertical and directional tight gas activity. Significant developments in North American gas supply since our last report in the fall of 2009 are: Moderate increase in overall U.S. gas production (1.2 Bcf/d in third quarter) Ongoing gas production increases from the major shale and tight plays Declining conventional production Increase in horizontal and directional onshore rig and completion activity Relatively low wellhead prices due to weak economy and more supply Emergence of the Appalachian Marcellus Shale as a giant play Continued growth of the giant Haynesville Shale Confirmation of British Columbia Shales (Horn River and Montney) as potential giant gas plays Emergence of Eagle Ford Shale gas and oil play in south Texas Increased activity in oil and associated gas or wet gas portions of shale plays, including Barnett, Eagle Ford, and Bakken. Excess deliverability caused by rapidly increasing gas production from shale plays Trend toward longer horizontal laterals and more frac stages in shale wells Drilling cost declines onshore and offshore. ICF forecasts that 2010 Lower-48 gas production will be 20.5 Tcf, about 1.3 percent higher than in 2009. Going forward into next year we are forecasting a 2.7 percent increase relative to 2010. The production analysis presented here is based upon analysis of data from commercial data, state agencies, and the Energy Information Administration 2

(EIA). It incorporates a procedure to estimate recent production where reported production is not yet complete due to a reporting lag. Historic gas production at the individual play level is based upon ICF analysis of state agency and commercial well level production data, as well as individual company reports. The gas production forecast presented here is consistent with the ICF Compass forecast which is a detailed forecast and market analysis of North America. The forecasts of gas storage, pipeline imports, and LNG imports presented here are derived from that forecast. Drilling Activity U.S. drilling activity in recent years peaked in September, 2008. This was followed by one of the steepest and largest drops in history, bottoming in June, 2009. The large swing in activity corresponded to the sharp decline in the U.S. economy, reduced credit availability, shale gas deliverability additions, and other factors. As the economy and credit markets have improved, drilling activity has rebounded significantly in 2010. U.S. total oil and gas rig activity (Baker-Hughes) in August 2010 averaged 1,632 rigs, which was 665 rigs (69%) higher than in August of 2009. The increase was driven primarily by shale gas activity in the Haynesville, Marcellus, Fayetteville, Barnett, and Woodford plays. Activity has increased in all major onshore producing areas, indicating some increase in conventional activity as well. While shale gas drilling activity remains robust, a significant trend in drilling activity since the first half of 2010 has been an increase in oil-targeted activity including shale and tight sand plays that have significant liquid components such as the Eagle Ford play in Texas and the Granite Wash play in the Mid-Continent. This trend has been driven by large price differences between oil and gas on an energy-equivalent basis. 3

Baker-Hughes tracks three rig activity categories: vertical, horizontal, and directional. Horizontal activity is heavily dominated by shale gas plays. The number of horizontal rigs increased from approximately 420 in August, 2009 to about 900 rigs today, or about 54 percent of the total. Currently, about 67 percent of rigs are either horizontal or directional and 33 percent are vertical. Exhibit 1 presents 2010 trends in drilling activity by region. The overall increase in August was 69 percent relative to last year. All major areas except the Gulf of Mexico experienced increased activity. Exhibit 1 U.S. and Canadian Drilling Trends August Data - Total Rigs Source: Baker Hughes Total Rigs Total Rigs Total Rigs Aug Aug Change 2009 2010 (%) Regional U.S. Rig Trends Rockies 97 142 46% Midcontinent 146 189 29% Texas 358 709 98% Louisiana 136 184 35% Gulf of Mexico 29 20-31% Appalachia 84 124 48% Other 117 264 126% Lower-48 967 1,632 69% Exhibit 2 compares rig activity in 2009 and 2010. Looking at the U.S. rig counts for the first eight months of 2010, the average was 934 rigs. This can be compared to an average of 852 gas rigs during the same months last year, an increase of 9.6 percent. On a calendar year basis, ICF is forecasting an average of 948 gas rigs this year, an increase of 17 percent. ICF forecasts a continued moderate increase in rigs and completion activity in the last half of the year. 4

A large factor driving rig activity is the need to drill new leases in many areas of the large unconventional gas plays. Leases that are not held by production must be drilled or they will expire. This factor has been present since last year and will continue in the near future due to the extensive area of these plays. It appears that in some plays, well completion and production has been delayed after some leases are drilled, apparently due to poor market conditions and possibly infrastructure issues. This was confirmed in early 2010 by an examination of well history records in the Haynesville play. No quantitative analysis of this has been conducted to date by ICF. Exhibit 2 Historical and Forecast Gas Rigs Gas Rigs Gas Rigs Gas Rigs 2009 2010 change January through August (actual) 852 934 9.6% Annual average (2010 forecast) 811 948 16.9% Drilling Cost Trends In recent years there were large increases in the cost of upstream activity, including drilling, stimulation, and completion. This was driven by various factors including increased demand for specialized drilling rigs and equipment, material costs, labor costs, and increased commodity costs. There were steep increases in the cost of materials and labor used in the construction of all types of energy infrastructure, including power plants, pipelines and oil and gas wells. These cost trends peaked in the first half of 2008. Since then, drilling rig rates have generally declined. 5

As one indicator of oil field commodity costs, Exhibit 3 shows the trends in cost per ton of carbon steel plate (used in line pipe, casing, pressure vessels, etc.). There has been a steep price decline since the first half of 2008. However, prices appear to have recently stabilized at approximately 2004 levels. Exhibit 3 $1,600 US Carbon Steel Plate Prices $1,400 US Dollars per Short Ton $1,200 $1,000 $800 $600 $400 $200 $0 2001-01 2002-01 2003-01 2004-01 2005-01 2006-01 2007-01 2008-01 2009-01 Date Domestic plate A36 (FOB US Midwest mill) from Bloomberg Exhibit 4 shows the average day rate for onshore drilling rigs in the U.S. This is a key component of U.S. drilling costs. The average day rate essentially doubled between 2003 and 2007. This had a major impact on overall resource development costs, especially when combined with cost increases for materials. There has been a sharp decline since 2008. However, this year has seen a slight uptick in rates. 6

Exhibit 4 Average Onshore U.S. Drilling Rig Day Rate $16,000 $14,000 $12,000 Dollars per Day $10,000 $8,000 $6,000 $4,000 $2,000 $0 Q1.99 Q2.99 Q3.99 Q4.99 Q1.00 Q2.00 Q3.00 Q4.00 Q1.01 Q2.01 Q3.01 Q4.01 Q1.02 Q2.02 Q3.02 Q4.02 Q1.03 Q2.03 Q3.03 Q4.03 Q1.04 Q2.04 Q3.04 Q4.04 Q1.05 Q2.05 Q3.05 Q4.05 Q1.06 Q2.06 Q3.06 Q4.06 Q1.07 Q2.07 Q3.07 Q4.07 Q1.08 Q2.08 Q3.08 Q4.08 Q1.09 Q2.09 Q3.09 Q4.09 Q1.10 Quarter The cost of onshore wells, while primarily driven by the rig day rate, is also impacted by other costs. For example, as operators drill deeper for shale and tight gas, drilling costs per foot increase. The reservoir stimulation component of completed well costs has also increased greatly, as a result of expensive, specialized multi-stage frac jobs. Industry outlays for drilling are affected by the number of high cost unconventional wells, well configurations (especially lateral length and number of stages), day rate, and stimulation costs. As a result of these trends, industry capital outlays for development have been very high. 7

Exhibit 5 shows historic rig rates for offshore deepwater semisubmersibles. These day rates more than quadrupled since 2003, peaking in 2009. Since that time, rates have fallen by about 40 percent. Exhibit 5 Thousand Dollars per Day (nominal) 500 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 Gulf of Mexico Semisubmersible Day Rate - Through May 2010 Semi 5000-7500 Avr. 0 Jul-99 Nov-99 Mar-00 Jul-00 Nov-00 Mar-01 Jul-01 Nov-01 Mar-02 Jul-02 Nov-02 Mar-03 Jul-03 Nov-03 Mar-04 Jul-04 Nov-04 Mar-05 Jul-05 Nov-05 Mar-06 Jul-06 Nov-06 Mar-07 Jul-07 Nov-07 Mar-08 Jul-08 Nov-08 Mar-09 Jul-09 Nov-09 Mar-10 Source: Offshore Data Services Month 8

Gas Well Completions Exhibit 6 shows monthly U.S. gas well completion statistics from the EIA Monthly Energy Review. Completion activity increased through most of 2008, then declined sharply in the last quarter of 2008. Declines continued through the first half of 2009. Activity was then flat through the remainder of 2009 and has since increased in the first half of this year. Exhibit 6 Monthly U.S. Gas Well Completions - 2007-10 (Source: EIA Monthly Energy Review) 3,500 2007 Gas Well Completions 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 2008 2010 2009 2007 2008 2009 2010 500 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Month 9

Exhibit 7 presents Lower-48 gas well completion statistics starting with the first quarter of 2007. The table presents EIA Monthly Energy Review data, API Quarterly Completion Report data, and ICF estimates. Based upon trends in rig activity and available well-completion data for 2009, ICF is forecasting the completion of about 20,000 Lower-48 gas wells in 2010. This represents an increase of 18 percent from the estimated 16,969 wells completed in 2009. Exhibit 7 Comparison of Quarterly Lower 48 Completion Counts Estimated Gas Well Completions Sources: EIA Monthly Energy Review and API Completion Report. EIA API Monthly Energy Quarterly Comp. Review Report ICF With Estimated Estimated Estimates 2007 Q1 8,609 6,945 6,945 2007 Q2 8,976 7,422 7,422 2007 Q3 8,744 7,875 7,875 2007 Q4 9,276 7,697 7,697 2008 Q1 7,911 6,912 6,912 2008 Q2 8,436 7,406 7,406 2008 Q3 9,023 7,859 7,859 2008 Q4 8,737 7,351 7,351 2009 Q1 6,626 5,978 5,978 2009 Q2 4,135 3,613 3,613 2009 Q3 4,074 3,578 3,578 2009 Q4 4,280 3,361 3,800 2010 Q1 5,175 4,400 2010 Q2 5,564 4,700 2010 Q3 6,083 5,300 2010 Q4 6,608 5,600 Annual Totals % chg. 2007 35,605 29,939 29,939 2008 34,107 29,528 29,528-1.4% 2009 19,115 16,530 16,969-42.5% 2010 23,430 --- 20,000 17.9% 10

Natural Gas Production There has been a continued increase in gas production from onshore nonconventional gas plays and new production from emerging unconventional plays. Shale and tight gas development continues to dominate activity onshore. Unconventional drilling and completion activity in the U.S. has been largely focused on the following plays: Barnett Shale in the Fort Worth Basin Marcellus Shale in Appalachia Haynesville and Bossier Shales in North Louisiana and East Texas Fayetteville Shale in Arkansas Woodford Shale in Oklahoma Eagle Ford Shale in South Texas Bossier Tight Sand in East Texas and North Louisiana Lance Tight Sand in the Green River Basin (Jonah-Pinedale) Mesaverde Tight Sand in the Uinta and Piceance Basins Anadarko Basin Tight Cleveland and Granite Wash Sands Powder River Basin Coalbed Methane San Juan Basin Coalbed Methane and Tight Gas Exhibits 8a and 8b illustrate gas production trends from several key onshore plays. Included in the chart in Exhibit 8a are the Barnett Shale in the Fort Worth Basin, the Bossier Tight Sand in East Texas, the Fayetteville Shale in Arkansas, the Woodford Shale in Eastern Oklahoma, the Jonah and Pinedale tight gas fields in Southwestern Wyoming, the Piceance Basin tight gas in Colorado, the Haynesville Shale of Northern Louisiana and East Texas, the Marcellus Shale in Appalachia and the Powder River Basin. These plays have experienced an increase in gas production of over 15 Bcf per day since 2000. During the same period, Lower-48 dry gas production increased, but at a much lower rate. Thus, 11

these few plays have been largely responsible for increasing U.S. gas production during this period. Exhibit 8b shows the shale plays separately. Through 2008, the Barnett Shale continued to dominate shale gas production. While the rate of increase in the Barnett has slowed, the overall rate of production increase from the shale plays is very steep. Note that some of the Barnett production decline is likely due to a combination of reporting lag and temporary shut-ins. Exhibit 8a Gas Producton Through 2009 - Selected Plays 18 BCF per Day 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 PRB Coalbed Marcellus Shale Haynesville Shale Piceance Basin Pinedale Field Jonah Field Woodford Shale Fayetteville Shale Bossier Sand Barnett Shale 0 00-1 00-6 00-11 01-04 01-09 02-02 02-07 02-12 03-05 03-10 04-03 04-08 05-01 05-06 05-11 06-04 06-09 07-02 07-07 07-12 08-05 08-10 09-03 09-08 12

Exhibit 8b Shale Gas Producton Through 2009 - Major U.S. Plays BCF per Day 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Marcellus Shale Haynesville Shale Woodford Shale Fayetteville Shale Barnett Shale 0 00-1 00-6 00-11 01-04 01-09 02-02 02-07 02-12 03-05 03-10 04-03 04-08 05-01 05-06 05-11 06-04 06-09 07-02 07-07 07-12 08-05 08-10 09-03 09-08 13

Exhibits 9 through 11 present the ICF Lower-48 natural gas production analysis and forecast. Lower-48 gas production in the third quarter of 2010 is expected in this analysis to average 56.2 Bcf per day, up significantly from 55.0 Bcf/d in the third quarter of last year. These estimates are presented graphically in Exhibit 10. Lower-48 production since 2008 has increased fairly steadily, despite large swings in rig counts and completion activity. This is because of the prolific nature of the unconventional gas plays and the fact that completion rates in those plays have not varied as much as overall U.S. completion rates. The highest rate of U.S. gas production in history occurred during the early 1970s, when dry gas production was approximately 60 Bcf per day. This rate will likely be exceeded in the near future. The lower portion of Exhibit 9 presents an annual summary and shows the percentage change in Lower-48 production. ICF estimates that 2010 production will average 56.1 Bcf/d (20.5 Tcf), a 1.3 percent increase over 2009. The forecast for 2011 is for an average of 57.6 Bcf/d, a 2.7 percent increase over this year. Exhibit 11 presents the details of winter monthly natural gas production since November 2008 and the ICF forecast for the upcoming winter. The forecast is for Lower-48 production to average 57.5 Bcf/d this winter through March of 2011. This is about 2 Bcf/d higher than last year. 14

Exhibit 9 ICF Analysis of Lower-48 Quarterly Wellhead Gas Production Dry marketed total gas - Bcf per day Quarterly averages Quarterly Bcfd Quarterly Bcf per day * Change Pct. Chg. 2006 1Q06 48.58 1.75 3.7% 2Q06 49.57 0.99 2.0% 3Q06 49.90 0.33 0.7% 4Q06 49.77-0.13-0.3% 2007 1Q07 50.26 0.49 1.0% 2Q07 51.28 1.02 2.0% 3Q07 51.98 0.70 1.4% 4Q07 52.95 0.97 1.9% 2008 1Q08 55.27 2.32 4.4% 2Q08 55.95 0.67 1.2% 3Q08 54.04-1.91-3.4% 4Q08 54.95 0.91 1.7% 2009 1Q09 55.27 0.32 0.6% 2Q09 55.94 0.67 1.2% 3Q09 54.98-0.96-1.7% 4Q09 55.39 0.41 0.7% 2010 1Q10 55.07-0.32-0.6% 2Q10 55.91 0.84 1.5% 3Q10 56.19 0.28 0.5% 4Q10 57.25 1.06 1.9% 2011 1Q11 57.50 0.25 0.4% 2Q11 57.48-0.02 0.0% 3Q11 57.49 0.01 0.0% 4Q11 57.95 0.46 0.8% Annual averages Annual Annual Bcfd Annual Production Change Bcf per day Change Pct. Chg. Bcf/Yr. Bcf 2005 48.66-1.21-2.43% 17,761-492 2006 49.46 0.80 1.64% 18,053 292 2007 51.62 2.16 4.37% 18,841 788 2008 55.05 3.43 6.64% 20,147 1,306 2009 55.39 0.34 0.62% 20,217 70 2010 56.11 0.72 1.30% 20,480 263 2011 57.61 1.50 2.67% 21,028 548 * Production excludes approximately 1.0 Bcfd of marketed Alaska gas production and 200 MMcfd of supplemental gas production consisting of coal gas and propane-air. 15

Exhibit 10 ICF Analysis of Lower 48 Dry Gas Production September 2010 62.0 60.0 2008 2009 2010 2011 58.0 56.0 Bcf per day 54.0 52.0 50.0 48.0 46.0 44.0 1Q08 2Q08 3Q08 4Q08 1Q09 2Q09 3Q09 4Q09 1Q10 2Q10 3Q10 4Q10 1Q11 2Q11 3Q11 4Q11 16

Exhibit 11 Historical and Forecast Winter Monthly Production November - March Source: ICF Database and Models Bcf Historical 2008-09 Historical 2009-10 ICF Forecast for this winter Bcf Bcf Bcf Nov 2008 1,673 Nov 2009 1,672 Nov 2010 1,726 Dec 2008 1,699 Dec 2009 1,709 Dec 2010 1,788 Jan 2009 1,677 Jan 2010 1,687 Jan 2011 1,785 Feb 2009 1,556 Feb 2010 1,550 Feb 2011 1,609 Mar 2009 1,742 Mar 2010 1,720 Mar 2011 1,782 total 8,347 8,337 8,689 Bcf per day Historical 2008-09 Historical 2009-10 ICF Forecast for this winter Bcfd Bcfd Bcfd Nov 2008 55.8 Nov 2009 55.7 Nov 2010 57.5 Dec 2008 54.8 Dec 2009 55.1 Dec 2010 57.7 Jan 2009 54.1 Jan 2010 54.4 Jan 2011 57.6 Feb 2009 55.6 Feb 2010 55.3 Feb 2011 57.5 Mar 2009 56.2 Mar 2010 55.5 Mar 2011 57.5 average 54.9 55.2 57.5 Comparison with EIA Short-Term Forecast EIA publishes a short-term forecast each month with quarterly estimates of U.S. natural gas production and imports. Exhibit 12 presents the EIA and ICF quarterly production averages for the Lower-48. EIA is forecasting a 2010 Lower-48 gas production increase of 2.1 percent. This compares to an increase of 1.3 percent in the ICF analysis. The EIA forecast for 2011 is for a 0.6 percent decline, compared with our 2.7 percent increase. 17

Exhibit 12 Comparison with EIA Short Term Outlook Bcf per day; Lower-48 and U.S. Total Dry Gas Production ICF Current Study vs. EIA Short Term Outlook Lower 48 ICF EIA EIA Difference (Lower 48) (U.S. Total) (Lower 48) ICF vs.eia 2008 1Q 55.27 57.95 56.73-1.46 2Q 55.95 58.56 57.53-1.58 3Q 54.04 57.26 56.30-2.26 4Q 54.95 58.57 57.39-2.44 2009 1Q 55.27 58.11 56.89-1.62 2Q 55.94 57.63 56.57-0.63 3Q 54.98 56.84 55.91-0.93 4Q 55.39 57.08 55.94-0.55 2010 1Q 55.07 58.36 57.20-2.13 2Q 55.91 59.19 58.18-2.27 3Q 56.19 58.12 57.14-0.95 4Q 57.25 57.88 56.75 0.50 2011 1Q 57.50 58.19 57.00 0.50 2Q 57.48 57.80 56.78 0.70 3Q 57.49 57.26 56.27 1.22 4Q 57.95 57.07 55.95 2.00 % chg. % chg. Difference 2009 55.39 0.62% 57.41 56.32-1.16% -0.93 2010 56.11 1.30% 58.57 57.50 2.09% -1.39 2011 57.61 2.67% 58.17 57.16-0.60% 0.45 Lower-48 Production Comparison with EIA Short Term Outlook 64.0 62.0 Bcf per Day 60.0 58.0 56.0 54.0 52.0 50.0 EIA ICF Current Study 08-1Q 08-2Q 08-3Q 08-4Q 09-1Q 09-2Q 09-3Q 09-4Q 10-1Q 10-2Q 10-3Q 10-4Q 11-1Q 11-2Q 11-3Q 11-4Q Year and Quarter 18

Storage Injection At the end of August, U.S. inventories of working natural gas in storage stood at about 3.16 Tcf, or 190 Bcf above the five-year average of 2.97 Tcf and 190 Bcf lower than the 3.35 Tcf at the end of late August, 2009. As shown in Exhibit 13 (a), the 2009 storage volumes were significantly above the five year average during the first half of 2010. The ICF forecast is for the storage level on November 1 to be approximately 3.70 Tcf. This is slightly below the 3.81 Tcf last year. Exhibit 13 (b) presents the monthly working gas storage data. In a recent report, EIA estimated that so-called demonstrated peak storage capacity in the U.S. as of April, 2010 was 4.049 Tcf, which was approximately 160 Bcf higher than in April, 2009. 1 As defined by EIA, demonstrated peak storage capacity is the sum of the highest actual facility level storage volumes reported over the prior five year period. EIA estimated that working gas design capacity as of April was 4.36 Tcf. ICF estimates that U.S. working gas storage capacity is 4.00 Tcf. This estimate is based upon our project level analysis, including estimates for expected startups this year. The method used involves evaluation of historical storage fill in older facilities combined with design capacity for facilities without a history of storage. This estimate is generally equivalent in definition to the EIA demonstrated capacity estimate above. The current ICF forecast of peak storage this fall of 3.70 Tcf represents 92 percent of our estimate of storage capacity. 1 U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2010, Peak Underground Working Natural Gas Storage Capacity, September, 2010. http://www.eia.gov/pub/oil_gas/natural_gas/feature_articles/2010/ngpeakstorage/ng_peak.html 19

Exhibit 13 (a) Gas Storage - Entire Year With Forecast U.S. Working Gas Inventories - End of Month Volumes Bcf 4,000 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2008 2009 2010 With ICF Forecast 5 year avg. Exhibit 13 (b) Underground Natural Gas Storage - BCF Working Gas - End of Month 2010 With ICF 2008 2009 Forecast 5 year avg. Jan 2,056 2,137 2,319 2,188 Feb 1,465 1,757 1,696 1,665 Mar 1,266 1,656 1,662 1,500 Apr 1,436 1,903 2,012 1,701 May 1,840 2,367 2,421 2,115 Jun 2,178 2,752 2,741 2,465 Jul 2,517 3,086 2,953 2,746 Aug 2,866 3,353 3,160 2,974 Sep 3,161 3,643 3,511 3,275 Oct 3,399 3,807 3,696 3,483 Nov 3,346 3,833 3,642 3,443 Dec 2,840 3,131 3,176 2,911 20

Pipeline Imports and Exports Exhibit 14 shows the winter pipeline imports from Canada and exports to Mexico, starting with the winter of 2008-09. Import data are net to the U.S. The historical Canadian import data are taken from the ICF Compass and are a combination of Stats Canada data and pipeline bulletin boards. Net imports from Canada last winter (2009-10) averaged 6.8 Bcf per day, about 6 percent lower than the previous winter s average. This winter we forecast that imports from Canada will average 6.2 Bcf per day, a decline of 8 percent or 0.5 Bcf/d relative to last winter. The volume of Canadian pipeline imports depends on WCSB gas production and demand in both Canada and the U.S. Western Canada production has been declining, and ICF is forecasting that this will continue in the near-term, although longer-term potential is excellent and the trend will change with increased production. While production has declined, gas demand in Alberta has increased, primarily due to oilsands processing needs. Thus, net exports have declined at a greater rate than production. While gas production from Western Canada coalbed methane is increasing, these gains have not resulted in an upturn in overall gas production. Canadian shale gas is just beginning to be produced in British Columbia. Significant plays are the Horn River Basin, the Montney Siltstone, and Deep Basin tight gas. Shale gas and tight gas in Canada is expected to make a very large contribution within the next few years. 21

Exhibit 14 Pipeline Imports from Canada and Exports to Mexico November though March Sources: ICF Monthy Gas Update and EIA Natural Gas Monthly Net Imports from Canada Bcf per day positive = net imports Historical 2008-09 Historical 2009-10 ICF Forecast for this winter 2010-11 Bcfd Bcfd Bcfd Nov 2008 7.10 Nov 2009 6.10 Nov 2010 6.50 Dec 2008 7.50 Dec 2009 6.60 Dec 2010 7.10 Jan 2009 7.60 Jan 2010 7.10 Jan 2011 6.10 Feb 2009 7.10 Feb 2010 7.70 Feb 2011 6.00 Mar 2009 6.80 Mar 2010 6.40 Mar 2011 5.50 average 7.22 6.77 6.24 Net Exports to Mexico Bcf per day negative = net exports Historical 2008-09 Historical 2009-10 ICF Forecast for this winter 2010-11 Bcfd Bcfd Bcfd Nov 2008-0.80 Nov 2009-0.80 Nov 2010-0.70 Dec 2008-0.90 Dec 2009-0.80 Dec 2010-0.70 Jan 2009-1.00 Jan 2010-0.80 Jan 2011-0.60 Feb 2009-1.00 Feb 2010-0.80 Feb 2011-0.70 Mar 2009-0.90 Mar 2010-0.80 Mar 2011-0.60 average -0.92-0.80-0.66 Winter LNG Imports In recent years, the U.S. has typically imported 1.0 to 1.5 Bcf/d of LNG during the winter months. We have historically imported more LNG in the summer months when there is less demand in Europe. Prior to the boom in shale gas, most analysts believed that LNG imports would ramp up greatly in coming years to fill a supply gap. While LNG is still expected to be a major source of incremental U.S. supply over the long term, it is not expected to contribute greatly in the near term due to surging U.S. gas production. 22

Exhibit 15 shows the recent history of worldwide LNG shipments and world gas production. LNG imports to North America (primarily to the U.S.) increased in 2009 to 658 Bcf, up from 524 Bcf in 2008. U.S. imports (not shown) increased to 452 Bcf in 2009 from 351 Bcf in 2008. World production of LNG increased to 8,571 Bcf. However, world gas production fell slightly (about 2 Tcf) in 2009 relative to 2008. LNG shipments to Europe increased greatly in 2009. The increase of 488 Bcf accounted for most of the worldwide increase in LNG production. Most of the increase was in Belgium and the U.K. Exhibit 15 World LNG Imports and Gas Production EIA data through 2005; BP Statistical Review for 2006 forward LNG Imports Gas Production LNG World North Post-2000 Gas Post-2000 America Europe Asia - Pacific Other Total Increase Production Increase Bcf Bcf Bcf Bcf Bcf Bcf Tcf Tcf 2000 239 1,150 3,544 4,933 0 85.4 0.0 2001 261 1,157 3,776 5,194 261 87.6 2.2 2002 253 1,386 3,671 5,310 377 89.1 3.7 2003 544 1,390 3,978 5,912 979 92.4 7.0 2004 683 1,423 4,347 6,453 1,520 94.9 9.5 2005 664 1,668 4,495 6,827 1,894 98.2 12.8 2006 652 2,028 4,774 7,454 2,521 101.7 16.3 2007 886 1,883 5,225 7,994 3,061 104.3 18.9 2008 524 1,949 5,502 7,975 3,042 107.8 22.4 2009 658 2,437 5,376 100 8,571 3,638 105.5 20.1 Percentage of world LNG imports 2000 4.8% 23.3% 71.8% 0.0% 100.0% 2001 5.0% 22.3% 72.7% 0.0% 100.0% 2002 4.8% 26.1% 69.1% 0.0% 100.0% 2003 9.2% 23.5% 67.3% 0.0% 100.0% 2004 10.6% 22.1% 67.4% 0.0% 100.0% 2005 9.7% 24.4% 65.8% 0.0% 100.0% 2006 8.7% 27.2% 64.0% 0.0% 100.0% 2007 11.1% 23.6% 65.4% 0.0% 100.0% 2008 6.6% 24.4% 69.0% 0.0% 100.0% 2009 7.7% 28.4% 62.7% 1.2% 100.0% 23

Exhibit 16 shows monthly LNG gross imports for the past two winters and the ICF forecast for this winter. The winter total volume imported for 2008-09 was 140 Bcf, or 0.92 Bcf per day. Last winter, the volume increased to 211 Bcf, or 1.40 Bcf/d. For the upcoming winter, ICF is forecasting a volume of 290 Bcf, or 1.92 Bcf/d -- about 0.5 Bcf per day more than last winter. Exhibit 16 Historical and Forecast Winter LNG Imports November - March; Gross Imports - Not Net of Alaska Exports Source of historical data: EIA Natural Gas Monthly (Data shown through March 2010) Source of forecast: ICF Compass Bcf Historical 2008-09 Historical 2009-10 ICF Forecast for this winter 2010-11 Bcf Bcf Bcf Nov 2008 22.8 Nov 2009 36.7 Nov 2010 57 Dec 2008 30.7 Dec 2009 35.2 Dec 2010 59 Jan 2009 26.9 Jan 2010 56.4 Jan 2011 62 Feb 2009 27.9 Feb 2010 45.8 Feb 2011 53 Mar 2009 31.6 Mar 2010 37.1 Mar 2011 59 total 139.9 211.2 290 Bcf per day Historical 2008-09 Historical 2009-10 ICF Forecast for this winter 2010-11 Bcf Bcf Bcf Nov 2008 0.76 Nov 2009 1.22 Nov 2010 1.90 Dec 2008 0.99 Dec 2009 1.13 Dec 2010 1.90 Jan 2009 0.87 Jan 2010 1.82 Jan 2011 2.00 Feb 2009 1.00 Feb 2010 1.64 Feb 2011 1.90 Mar 2009 1.02 Mar 2010 1.20 Mar 2011 1.90 average 0.92 1.40 1.92 24

Summary Exhibit 17 summarizes the results of the supply analysis Exhibit 17 Supply Outlook for Winter 2010-11 percent source 2009-10 2010-11 change change U.S. production vs previous year (trend) 1 --- Up --- --- Annual well completions (calendar year) 2 16,969 20,000 3,031 17.9% Annual rig count (gas rigs Jan. - December) 3 811 948 137 16.9% Winter LNG imports (Bcf/d - Nov. - March) 4 1.40 1.92 0.52 37.1% Winter average gas production (Bcf/d - Lower 48) 5 55.2 57.5 2.30 4.2% Working gas in storage (Tcf - Nov.1) 6 3.81 3.70-0.11-2.9% Net pipeline imports from Canada (Bcf/d - Nov. - Mar.) 7 6.77 6.24-0.53-7.8% Sources: 1. ICF - Current Study - State and federal data with ICF adjustments and forecast. 2. API Quarterly Completion Report with ICF estimates. 3. Baker Hughes gas rigs with ICF forecast through December. 4. Historical data from EIA Natural Gas Monthly; Forecast from ICF Compass. 5. Historical and forecast from current study. Derived from state and federal data with adjustments and forecast 6. Historical data from EIA; Forecast from ICF Compass 7. Historical data from StatsCanada and bulletin boards; Forecast from ICF Compass 25