Challenges Facing Transforming Inland Ports into Integrated Transportation Centers

Similar documents
UNDERSTANDING THE GLOBAL IMPACT OF INCREASED WATERWAY COMMERCE. Bruce Lambert Executive Director, Institute for Trade and Transportation Studies

Considering the Importance of Goods Movement to West Virginia. Bruce Lambert Executive Director Institute for Trade and Transportation Studies

THE ROLE OF INLAND AND SEA PORTS IN THE. Bruce Lambert ECONOMY

TDL Industry Trends from a National Viewpoint

The Point Intermodal River Port Facility at the Port of Huntington Project Benefit Cost Summary

Policy Session Rappateur Summary. Topic: Inland Waterway Issues. January 25-26, 2012

America Association of Port Authorities Maritime Economic Development Seminar New Bedford. Paul H Bea Jr June 5, 2012

Freight And Infrastructure. Bruce Lambert Executive Director Institute for Trade and Transportation Studies

Appendix F: Scenario Planning

Freight Plans Planning, Preparing Staying Ahead. MAASTO July, 2013

access to the world s markets. The National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) recognizes

Researching Urban Freight. Bruce Lambert

Freight Corridors: Changes and Challenges

Ohio Department of Transportation Ohio Statewide Freight Study/ Plan

Waterways Dredging and Operational Improvements

Waterways 1 Water Transportation History

ECMAR Brokerage Session

10/19/18. Source: Texas Transportation Institute, 2007

2014 Minnesota Statewide Freight Summit

New England Trade Development Summit

The Economic Realities of Water Transportation

The Fertilizer Institute. Current Transportation Dynamics November 6, 2006 By Tom Williamson, Transportation Consultants Co.

The Great Lakes. Progress Report

PORT INLAND DISTRIBUTION NETWORK SOUTH JERSEY SITE EVALUATION AND FEASIBILITY DEVELOPMENT STUDY. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY July 2003

Eric Thomas Benchmark River and Rail Terminals

Working Group 32 Report

Integrating Freight into Transportation Planning. Keith Robbins District Freight Coordinator, FDOT District One

MULTIMODAL NETWORK ANALYSIS FOR COAL FREIGHT IN KENTUCKY SESSION 6.2.3

Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Value to the Nation

Can Traditional Highway Asset Management Strategies Be Adapted To Waterway Infrastructure Analysis?

COALITION PARTICIPANTS

Challenges with Evaluating Container Port Projects and the Corps of Engineers

ST. LOUIS REGIONAL FREIGHT STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

PROJECTS. The KIPDA MPO s Central Location

Bruce Lambert Presentation to LSU Capstone Class, Spring 09

P2 WORKSHOP ON FREIGHT MODAL COMPETITIVENESS. Authors: Michail Xyntarakis Aswani Yeraguntla Sudeshna Sen Jolanda Prozzi Chandra Bhat

Expanding Regional Freight Information Resources for the Upper Midwest:

The Infrastructure Challenge: Perspectives on the Road Ahead

Conceptual Framework for Analyzing the MTS within the Intermodal System

Chapter 3 Missouri Freight System

Chapter 1 Introduction

Delaware Valley Goods. July 15, 2009

Port Performance I Port Performance Indicators. Selection and Measurement indicators. January 2012

Minnesota Statewide Freight System Plan Action Agenda Development Lead Agency (MnDOT or

Marine Transportation System Infrastructure Investment A State Perspective. August 28, 2012 Sean T. Connaughton Secretary of Transportation

TRANSPORTATION 101 Today and Tomorrow. Moving People and Goods

Northeast Rail Operations Study (NEROps)

Factors Affecting Transportation Decisions. Transportation in a Supply Chain. Transportation Modes. Road freight transport Europe

The Port Professional

Ingram Barge Company's test containers make dramatic arrival at America's Central Port

SECTOR ASSESSMENT (SUMMARY): LOGISTICS 1

MOTORWAYS OF THE SEA- CHALLENGES & OPPORTUNITIES FOR CHANGES IN OUR TRANSPORT

Freight: Global & Economic Perspective

2009 Ohio Conference on Freight

U.S. Department of Transportation Maritime Administration

International Conference VISIONS AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE TRANSPORT NETWORK Inland Navigation and River-Sea Shipping in the Baltic Sea Region

Kentucky River Area Development District

Development Council. Hudson River Foodway Corridor

Richard Teubner, Vice President INTRODUCTION TO SEACOR AMH

A DfT overview of Mode Shift Freight Grants and exploring the market opportunities for Coastal Shipping and Inland Waterways

Green ports policies, coastal shipping and inland waterways November, 2013 Incheon

Overview. Facilitating Trade through Competitive, Low-Carbon Transport

How HRTPO Helps Freight Move. Presented by Robert B. Case, PE, PhD Transportation Technical Advisory Committee Agenda Item #13 April 1, 2015

CONTAINER PORT GOALS 10-2

FHWA Programs Supporting Freight

MARITIME ADMINISTRATOR DAVID T. MATSUDA AAPA CONFERENCE/GRAND HYATT TAMPA BAY 2900 BAYPORT DRIVE, TAMPA, FLORIDA Tuesday, February 1, 2011

Kristin Decas Port of Hueneme Executive Director

ANNEX 2: PRIORITY "PRE-IDENTIFIED PROJECTS ON OTHER SECTIONS OF THE CORE NETWORK (RAILWAYS, INLAND WATERWAYS, ROADS, MARITIME AND INLAND PORTS) "

Inland Port Cargo Complex

Current status of coastal shipping in Japan

Transform Milwaukee. Section 8 Freight Transportation and Logistics. Summary Findings

CRITICAL COMMERCIAL ISSUES RELATED TO PORTS AND SHIPPING BUSINESS IN THE ERA OF INDONESIA MARINE HIGHWAY POLICY

Coastwise Coalition. Marine Highways? Northeast Diesel Collaborative Ports Working Group May 19, 2010

MAP-21 Freight Provisions and Data Needs

Twin Cities Metro Freight Study Summary of Results

Goal 1 Provide for a balanced and multimodal regional transportation system that meets existing and future needs.

Marine Highway System A Multimodal Short Sea Freight Shipping System

LOCATION, LOCATION, LOGISTICS

Dryports: Extending the Product Life Cycle of Ports. Prof. Kevin Cullinane Director of TRI

Components of an Attractive Minnesota Freight Market

Ron O Blenis, PE Senior Rail Project Manager (617)

Waterborne Commerce Statistics Center

Maritime Transportation Research Bank

Freight Trends and Freight Rail

Transportation Consortium at the Center for Transportation February 14, 2014

Creating Capacity. Mike Franczak Vice President Transportation Canadian Pacific Railway. American Association of Port Authorities - June 6, 2006

Marine Board Meeting April 13, The Economic Impact of the Port of Memphis. on the Memphis and Shelby County Economy by Younger Associates

AAPA PORT SECURITY SEMINAR & EXHIBITION July 16 18, 2008 HOUSTON, TX REGIONAL SECURITY INITIATIVES Mitch Smith Operations Director Port of South

America s Central Port is the St. Louis region s only full-service, public intermodal port. The 1,200-acre mixed-use business campus offers

American Association of Port Authorities Spring Meeting March 24, 2009

EUROPEAN SEA PORTS ORGANISATION ASBL/VZW ORGANISATION DES PORTS MARITIMES EUROPEENS ASBL/VZW

Kentucky River Area Development District. Regional Transportation Planning Committee

STATEWIDE PORTS NEEDS AND MARKETING ASSESSMENT. Port of Amory

The National Gateway Preparing for Tomorrow Lisa Mancini, VP Strategic Infrastructure Initiatives

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN: DRAFT KEY POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS

WATERWAYS: Vital to the Nation. The benefits provided by America s waterways spread far beyond commercial navigation.

Corridor Planning Organizations and Ports I-95 Corridor: A Marine Highway Corridor

The World Association for Waterborne Transport Infrastructure InCom WG 210. Smart Shipping on Inland Waterways. Terms of Reference

LogiC n. Our Partners LEAN SECURE RELIABLE. and LOGISTIC ULMAR CONNECTIVITY. To Get More Visit: for. SMEs

Effects of the Panama Canal Expansion on Texas Ports and Highway Corridors. executive summary

Transcription:

Challenges Facing Transforming Inland Ports into Integrated Transportation Centers Bruce Lambert Institute for Trade and Transportation Services Patrick Donovan West Virginia Public Port Authority Lynn Soporowski, PE Kentucky Cabinet of Transportation Mike Tagert Tenn-Tom Waterway Council

Some Questions per Smart Rivers? Are we using our river port resources in the most efficient manner possible to encourage freight mobility and economic growth? Can we connect to other modes? Can we support future cargo or vessels?

Outline Trends in Economic Development Waterways and Ports WV, KY, Tenn-Tom Common Elements Going Forward

Site Selection November 2008 Survey Ease of permitting and regulatory procedures Transportation infrastructure Existing work-force skills State and local tax scheme Utility infrastructure Land/building prices and supply Workers' comp rates Flexibility of incentives programs Higher education resources Availability of incentives http://www.siteselection.com/issues/2008/nov/cover/

KPMG: Bridging the Global Infrastructure Gap: Views From the Executive Suite. Senior executives are concerned that the current infrastructure inadequately supports their businesses. Indeed, only 14 percent believe that infrastructure is completely adequate in this regard. The quality and availability of infrastructure directly affect where businesses locate and expand their operations, according to 90 percent of senior executives surveyed. Infrastructure will become more important over the next five years and 77 percent of business executives surveyed fear there will not be enough infrastructure investment to support the long-term growth of their organizations. Eighty percent of executives want governments to partner with the private sector to finance major infrastructure projects. http://www.kpmg.com/global/issuesandinsights/articlesandpublications/p ages/bridging-global-infrastructure-gap.aspx

Trends in Economic Development Business Park Concept Greenfield-Brownfield development Clusters versus Growth Poles Site Selection Criteria Operational considerations Integrated Logistic Supply Chain Centers Firms locating big facilities with access to transportation infrastructure, not people Potential access to alternative energy is discussed (wind, water, solar)

The Shipper Demands low-cost, reliable service Mode and geographically neutrality Wants just in time services does not want or care about your problems (carrier or infrastructure) Firms outsourcing the Headaches of logistics No one believes congestion will go away Often ignore primarily freight infrastructure beyond immediate facility

Unique Characteristics of Inland Ports Most are landlord ports differentiate from private terminals Most are operated by State, County or Local Governments Economic Development Catalysts Civic Pride and Competition Very capital intensive, but may not be profitable Port Authorization extends beyond river s edge

So What Is The Range of an Inland Port? Various by many different factors: International or domestic cargos System reliability Scale and intermodal connectivity Industrial versus non-industrial use Single user or multiuse facilities Range 0 to 10,000 miles!

West Virginia Public Port Authority Mission Statement Develop the potential of intermodalism by combining highway, rail, and water transportation infrastructure to maximize overall economic advantages to business, industry, and the citizens of West Virginia. Developing a Regional Port Jackson County Maritime and Industrial Center Kanawha Valley Local Port Authority District Buffalo-Putnam Port District Cabell-Wayne Port District, Inc. Port of Huntington Tri-State Weirton Port & Industrial Center

Kentucky Public Ports

Tenn-Tom Waterways Economic Benefit

Common Elements Going Forward Information and Education Institutional Operational Financial

Information and Education Do They Know Me? Public Sector Do Ports provide economic benefits? Are inland ports for navigation only or commercial development? Are these benefits well understood, and if so, by whom? Invisible part of system Tie to economic growth not understood Private Sector Understand my services, facilities, etc.?

Institutional Do People Really Care? Public Sector Can we move beyond being only a checklist on a scorecard? Can we transform decision makers into agents for change internalize the debate? Perception of Corporate Welfare Nontraditional participants will be more engaged in debate Kentucky Waterways of the Interim Committee on Transportation Private Sector Want to see partners not conflicts

Operational What Does It Take To Get Moving? Ports are Corridors Maintenance not properly developed or conducted Reliability and other factors often outside of port s direct control People do not understand inland component of port activity Timelines are very different

Financial Is the Money There? As public entities, hard to secure funding State and local funding is uneven or even prohibited Can not say what I get back for investment (wetlands, etc.) Scale of investment hard to rationalize Tax receipts versus tax burdens Concerns over relationship with private terminals Port traffic subject to external fluctuations no guarantees exist! Funding needs differ also market variability Public Private Partnerships

What Happens After A Project Is Developed? Improved Operations (no change in fleet or routing, but per movement costs decline and\or reliability improves), Change in Routings (realignment of services with existing equipment already in trade), Change in the Capacity and Economies of Scale (larger equipment), Induced Service or Calls (new equipment enter service), Decline in use. Only improved operations are easy to quantify before the project is built, but the changing in capacity is expected to generate other benefits normally not quantified in base feasibility study.

Where Are We Today? Previous capital expenditures lead to economic growth Mature, Reliable, Robust industry Congestion and Maintenance threatening system operations Lock and Dam Replacement is critical Business want to utilize water as an alternative Ports as more than points on a river Facilities on water provide other opportunities not moving on waterways Ports engage in getting people on water geographically locate first then select port Recouple transportation to Economic Growth Economic development = people development